Ben Stull
142 lines
8.2 KiB
Markdown
142 lines
8.2 KiB
Markdown
# Session 0030.0 — Transcript
|
||
|
||
> App: vscode-cowriting-plugin
|
||
> Start: 2026-06-11T23-48 (PST)
|
||
> End: 2026-06-12T00-42 (PST)
|
||
> Type: planning-and-executing
|
||
> Posture: autonomous (yolo)
|
||
> Status: **FINALIZED**
|
||
> Outcome: **F10 (#29) shipped to `main`** via PR #30; issue #29 closed.
|
||
|
||
## Launch prompt
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
/goal next → plan-and-execute #29 (F10 — interactive markdown review).
|
||
Spec: specs/coauthoring-interactive-review.md (graduated in brainstorming session 0029).
|
||
Markdown preview as the single interactive review surface: clean zero-annotation
|
||
editor + annotated preview with on/off toggle (green=human / blue=LLM / strikethrough),
|
||
✓/✗ accept-reject for LLM-only changes in the webview. LLM changes surfaced as pending
|
||
F4 proposals (✓=F4 accept, ✗=F4 reject). One pure renderReview overlay; reverses F9
|
||
INV-26; INV-32..34; 4 slices.
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
`/goal next` resolved the `Next /goal:` field recorded by session 0029's finalize
|
||
to "plan-and-execute #29 (F10)".
|
||
|
||
## Pre-state
|
||
|
||
- On `main`, clean (origin/main behind 1 — fast-forwarded). Anchor #29 is
|
||
`type/feature` with a **graduated** Solution Design
|
||
(`specs/coauthoring-interactive-review.md`) → R2/R3 gate satisfied.
|
||
- F2–F9 + F7.1 shipped; F10 is "mostly assembly" of F3 (attribution `spansFor`),
|
||
F4 (propose/accept seam), F6 (baseline), F7/F9 (render engine) + 3 new pieces:
|
||
strip editor decorations, collapse F9's two modes to one on/off toggle, make the
|
||
preview interactive.
|
||
|
||
## Plan
|
||
|
||
Goal: plan-and-execute F10 (#29). "Write left, review right" — clean editor, the
|
||
rendered preview as the single interactive review surface. 4 slices (spec §7.2),
|
||
14 tasks; plan written via `superpowers:writing-plans`, archived to the content
|
||
repo `plans/` at finalize. Executed via `superpowers:subagent-driven-development`
|
||
(fresh implementer per slice + spec-compliance and code-quality review each).
|
||
|
||
**Code reconciliations (spec vs. actual), discovered by reading the code first:**
|
||
public seams are `acceptById(docPath,id)`/`rejectById(docPath,id)` (not private
|
||
`accept`/`reject`); `Proposal` carries `anchorId` resolved via `artifact.anchors`
|
||
→ `resolve(text, fp)` (not literal offsets); no `onDidChangeProposals` existed (added);
|
||
`trackChangesPreview` already took `AttributionController` (F9), added `ProposalController`;
|
||
`extension.ts` constructed the preview BEFORE the proposal controller — reordered.
|
||
|
||
## Session arc (turn-by-turn)
|
||
|
||
1. **Init.** `/goal next` → routed to `wgl-planning-and-executing`. Claimed session
|
||
0030 (peek: nothing in flight). Fast-forwarded `main`. Read the F10 spec + mapped
|
||
the 8 files F10 touches via 3 parallel Explore agents (exact signatures), then
|
||
read the central bodies (`trackChangesModel.ts`, `trackChangesPreview.ts`,
|
||
`proposalController.ts`, `extension.ts`) for ground truth.
|
||
2. **Plan.** Wrote `docs/superpowers/plans/2026-06-11-f10-interactive-review.md`
|
||
(4 slices, 14 tasks, TDD on the pure engine, host-E2E for the vscode layer).
|
||
Branch `f10-interactive-review`; committed the plan.
|
||
3. **SLICE-1 (clean editor, INV-32).** Implementer stripped F3 attribution
|
||
decorations (kept `spansFor`), removed F4 in-editor comment threads + pending
|
||
decoration (refactored bookkeeping to `state.live`/`state.unresolved`), hid the
|
||
F6 diff command/`ctrl+alt+d` + attribution toggle. Spec review ✅. **Code-quality
|
||
review found** the `visible`/`toggle`/`isVisible`/`toggleAttribution` toggle was
|
||
now dead/misleading → fixed directly (retired it; spec §6.2 says so). 189 unit green.
|
||
4. **SLICE-2 (combined render engine, INV-33).** Strict TDD. Extracted
|
||
`colorByAuthor` from the F9 sentinels; added `renderPlain` + `renderReview`
|
||
(+ `ProposalView`). Deferred removing public `renderAuthorship` to SLICE-3 (kept
|
||
the slice green). Spec ✅. **Code-quality review found a real correctness bug:**
|
||
`renderReview` matched a block's source range by raw-string equality →
|
||
misaligned author coloring for duplicate paragraphs. Fixed (TDD, positional
|
||
range pointer) + collapsed a redundant branch + escaped the proposal id. 41 model
|
||
/ 198 total green.
|
||
5. **SLICE-3 (interactive controller + webview, INV-34).** Removed public
|
||
`renderAuthorship`; added `ProposalController.listProposals`/`onDidChangeProposals`/
|
||
`keyFor`; collapsed the preview to an on/off toggle taking `ProposalController`;
|
||
routed ✓/✗/setMode webview messages through `acceptById`/`rejectById` (webview
|
||
never mutates the doc); status-bar indicator (PUC-6); rebuilt the webview asset
|
||
(on/off checkbox + ✓/✗ click→postMessage + CSS); reordered `extension.ts`. Spec ✅
|
||
(INV-34 traced end-to-end). Code-quality ✅ with one polish: renamed the webview
|
||
panel title "Track changes" → "Review" (fixed directly).
|
||
6. **SLICE-4 (tests & docs).** Updated obsolete suites (F9 authorship-mode +
|
||
retired-toggle), added `test/e2e/suite/f10Review.test.ts`, wrote
|
||
`docs/MANUAL-SMOKE-F10.md` + README F10 section. Found + fixed one real seam bug:
|
||
`statusText()` returned stale text after `hide()` → added `hideStatus()` clearing
|
||
the text. **E2E green: 46 + 5 passing.** Spec ✅, code-quality ✅.
|
||
7. **Final review + verification.** Whole-implementation review = ready to merge
|
||
(all invariants verified across slice seams). Ran the full suite myself:
|
||
189 unit + 51 E2E + clean build, tree clean.
|
||
8. **Ship.** Pushed branch; created PR #30 (Gitea API); merged to `main` (HTTP 200);
|
||
synced `main`, deleted the branch (local + remote); commented + closed #29;
|
||
post-merge sanity (build + 189 unit) green.
|
||
9. **Finalize.** Archived the plan to the content repo `plans/`; updated memory;
|
||
published this transcript.
|
||
|
||
## Cut state (final)
|
||
|
||
- **`main`** carries F10 (merge commit `4160890`, PR #30). Working tree clean
|
||
except the pre-existing untracked `specs/` dir.
|
||
- **Tests:** 189 unit (vitest, vscode-free) + 51 host E2E + clean esbuild build.
|
||
- **Tracker:** issue #29 closed; **no open issues remain** (Epic #1 closed).
|
||
- **No deploy pipeline** — VS Code extension, no flotilla/PPE/prod stage; "done" =
|
||
merge to `main` per spec §7.3. Manual webview smoke (`docs/MANUAL-SMOKE-F10.md`)
|
||
is the only step not automatable (sealed sandbox) — left for the operator.
|
||
|
||
## Deferred decisions
|
||
|
||
- **Proposal placement: trailing blocks vs. inline-at-anchor.** Spec §2/§6.2
|
||
describes pending proposals "rendered **inline at its resolved anchor**." The
|
||
implemented `renderReview` instead appends ALL proposals as trailing
|
||
`cw-proposal` blocks (anchored before unanchored), per the plan's explicit
|
||
Task-6 v1 design note (determinism + simplicity; inline-injection into the
|
||
block-level diff body is materially more complex). INV-34 holds (proposals are
|
||
visible, carry ✓/✗, never dropped); the deviation is purely positional. The
|
||
final whole-impl review judged it defensible and non-blocking. **Deferred:**
|
||
inline-at-anchor placement of resolved proposals → candidate follow-up issue,
|
||
alongside the spec §9 open items (preview→source scroll-sync, intra-emphasis
|
||
sentinel hardening, deleting F6's dead two-pane view code, the repo rename).
|
||
Worth confirming with the operator whether to file these.
|
||
|
||
## Loose ends
|
||
|
||
- Stray untracked `specs/` dir in the code repo (F8 + F10 design working copies;
|
||
they belong in the content repo `specs/` collection and were already submitted
|
||
there) — left untouched (carried from sessions 0024/0027).
|
||
- Stray worktree `.claude/worktrees/pedantic-brahmagupta-472309/` from a prior
|
||
session — not cleaned up here.
|
||
- Session 0024 still unfinalized (carried).
|
||
|
||
## Next-session prompt
|
||
|
||
The F10 follow-ups are not filed as issues and the tracker has no open anchor, so
|
||
the next move is a **capture** session to file them (issue-anchored discipline, R2):
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
/goal capture the F10 follow-ups as Gitea issues — lead: inline-at-anchor placement of resolved proposals in the review preview (per specs/coauthoring-interactive-review.md §2/§6.2; today they render as trailing cw-proposal blocks); plus the §9 open items — preview→source scroll-sync, intra-emphasis sentinel hardening, deleting F6's dead two-pane view code, and the repo rename to vscode-markdown-cowriting-plugin
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
Read [[f10-interactive-review-shipped]] first. Then a follow-up
|
||
planning-and-executing session can take whichever filed issue the operator picks.
|