Files
vscode-cowriting-plugin/sessions/0012/SESSION-0012.0-TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-10T21-53--2026-06-10T22-18.md

131 lines
7.3 KiB
Markdown
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# Session 0012.0 — Transcript
> App: vscode-cowriting-plugin
> Start: 2026-06-10T21-53 (PST) · End: 2026-06-10T22-18 (PST)
> Type: planning-and-executing
> Goal: implement Feature #12 (F4 propose/accept) per the graduated spec —
> leg 3 of the `/goal F4` arc (0010 captured #12, 0011 graduated its spec).
> Outcome: **F4 shipped** — PR #13 merged to main (`0ef70a0`), issue #12
> closed, full gate green.
## Launch prompt
```
Implement Feature #12 (F4 propose/accept) per the graduated spec vscode-cowriting-plugin-content/specs/coauthoring-propose-accept.md — plan just-in-time from its §7.2 slices, then execute; done = unit + host E2E green and the live smoke shows propose → accept → Claude-attributed. (Leg 3 of /goal F4: session 0010 captured #12, session 0011 graduated its spec.)
```
## Plan
1. Write the just-in-time implementation plan from spec §7.2's five slices
(`docs/superpowers/plans/2026-06-10-f4-propose-accept.md`, committed on the
feature branch; archived to content `plans/` at finalize). ✓
2. Execute on `feat/f4-propose-accept`: SLICE-1 proposals model + store prune →
SLICE-2 ProposalController core → SLICE-3 review UI + accept/reject →
SLICE-4 liveTurn propose-by-default flip + smoke doc → SLICE-5 host E2E +
README. TDD per slice; full gate green before merge. ✓ (one amendment)
3. PR → merge to main (autonomous posture). ✓ (PR #13)
4. Finalize: archive plan, memory, publish transcript. ✓
## Pre-session state
Clean pushed `main` (`d30ebbb` after claim). Spec graduated minutes earlier
(session 0011, content `c55a681`). Anchor #12: `type/feature` WITH approved
Solution Design → R2/R3 gate passes for planning-and-executing.
## Turn-by-turn arc
1. **Init.** Claimed 0012 (`--type planning-and-executing`); no in-flight
sessions; branched `feat/f4-propose-accept`.
2. **Plan.** Read the full shipped F3 surface (model/store/anchorer/
pendingEdits/attributionController/threadController/liveTurn/extension/
package.json/E2E suites) and wrote the 8-task plan with complete code per
task (superpowers:writing-plans), committed `debd09f`.
3. **Tasks 13 (SLICE-1, TDD).** Typed `Proposal` + stable serialization
(`652f861`; the runtime test passed early — vitest erases types — so the
red step was pinned at the typecheck layer); store anchor-prune learns
proposal anchorIds, closing the F3 TODO at store.ts:65 (`d5beb61`);
`proposalModel.ts` add/remove/fenced-diff-body helpers (`f474684`).
4. **Task 4 (SLICE-2/3).** `ProposalController` (`4efd34f`): propose ingress
(INV-10, caller-built fingerprint), persistence at propose time,
resolve-or-flag ladder (stale/orphaned undecidable-as-accept, INV-11),
second Comments controller + amber decoration + status-bar stale count,
accept (exact resolve → seam with `expectedVersion` → remove) / reject.
Proposal anchors deliberately NOT re-fingerprinted on save (the
fingerprint IS the staleness oracle).
5. **Tasks 56 (SLICE-3/4).** package.json contributes (✓/✗ thread-title
actions gated on `commentThread =~ /^pending$/`), extension wiring +
no-workspace stubs + `cowriting.proposeAgentEdit` E2E command + API export
(`4688ac8`); `editSelection` flipped propose-by-default — fingerprint
captured BEFORE the turn, no-change turns informational, seam fires only
on accept (`452c071`).
6. **Task 7 (SLICE-5) — found a real F3 bug.** First E2E run: accept's text
landed but attribution came back as FIVE fragmented HUMAN spans.
Instrumented the assertion → diagnosis: the host **word-diffs** one
applied WorkspaceEdit into several minimal hunks when old/new share
interior tokens; the registry's per-hunk exact match missed (F3's test
strings never shared tokens — latent since F3). **AMENDMENT 1:**
`PendingEditRegistry.matchEvent` (event-level net-effect match: every hunk
inside the registered full pre-edit range + equal net delta; one applyEdit
= one change event) replaces `match`; `AttributionController.onDidChange`
matches the event once and applies the full intended replacement as one
algebra edit. Registry unit tests rewritten; 6-test F4 E2E suite + fixture
+ no-workspace command-list update all green (`8fdea97`): 16+3 passing.
7. **Task 8.** Docs (MANUAL-SMOKE-F4.md; F3 smoke noted superseded steps;
README F4 section; playground loop updated) (`169abf0`). Full gate:
typecheck · 75/75 vitest · both bundles · 16+3 host E2E. Scripted live
smoke green (`run_8xPNs1QJ`, 34.6s, exit 0).
8. **Ship.** Pushed; Gitea PR #13 created and merged (merge commit
`0ef70a0`); `Closes #12` closed the Feature; branch deleted local+remote;
`main` clean. Plan archived to content `plans/2026-06-10-f4-propose-accept.md`
(`23c4b9d`).
## Pipeline note (§9)
A VS Code extension: no deploy stage, no PPE — this app's required tier is the
host E2E suite (F2/F3 precedent), which ran green twice (suite + full gate).
The live-LLM leg is the documented manual smoke; scripted half performed this
session, in-editor click-through on the operator's plate.
## Deferred decisions
- **Inline execution chosen over subagent-driven** (the plan header recommends
subagent-driven-development): tasks were tightly coupled to files already in
the driver's context and strictly sequential — judged faster and no less
safe inline. TDD discipline kept per task.
- **Seam fix scope (AMENDMENT 1):** replaced `match` outright instead of
keeping it alongside `matchEvent` — per-hunk matching is strictly weaker
and keeping both invites drift. F3's registry unit tests were rewritten to
the new contract. Judged correct, not just convenient; flagging because it
reshapes an F3-shipped internal.
- **In-editor propose→accept GUI smoke not performed** (cannot click EDH
buttons headlessly): host E2E pins every step except the literal button
click, and the scripted live smoke covers the LLM leg. Documented in
`docs/MANUAL-SMOKE-F4.md` with a smoke-log table for the operator.
## Cut state (end of session)
| Item | State |
| --- | --- |
| PR #13 (F4) | **Merged** to main (`0ef70a0`); branch deleted |
| Issue #12 | **Closed** by the merge |
| Plugin repo `main` | Clean, pushed; gate green |
| Plan | Archived: content `plans/2026-06-10-f4-propose-accept.md` (`23c4b9d`) |
| Spec | content `specs/coauthoring-propose-accept.md` (graduated, `c55a681`) |
| Epic #1 | All three acceptance pillars shipped (F2 threads · F3 attribution · F4 propose/accept) |
| Content repo | Two pre-existing uncommitted issue drafts (Author's plate, unchanged) |
## What lands on the operator's plate
- Run the in-editor propose→accept smoke once
(`docs/MANUAL-SMOKE-F4.md`) and log it in its table.
- Review the autonomous calls: spec graduated without interactive review
(session 0011), AMENDMENT 1 reshaped the F3 seam registry internals.
- The two uncommitted content-repo issue drafts (`f3-live-attribution.md`,
`f4-propose-accept.md`) remain yours to publish or discard.
## Prompt the operator can paste into the next session
```
/goal Capture Feature F5 (cross-rung git-native persistence format + round-trip to the Gitea substrate rung, per coauthoring-inner-loop.md §9 OPEN→F5, coauthoring-propose-accept.md §9 OPEN→F5, and rfc-app#46) as a typed issue under Epic #1 on benstull/vscode-cowriting-plugin, then brainstorm its Solution Design spec in a follow-up session.
```