Files
vscode-cowriting-plugin/sessions/0001/SESSION-0001.0-TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-09T21-55--2026-06-09T23-31.md

109 lines
5.4 KiB
Markdown
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# Session 0001.0 — Transcript
> App: vscode-cowriting-plugin
> Start: 2026-06-09T21-55 (PST)
> End: 2026-06-09T23-31 (PST)
> Type: capture
> Status: **FINALIZED**
## Launch prompt
"Use flotilla to create a new app. It's not a webapp — it's a Visual Studio
plugin so no GCP infra required. Similar to the Claude plugin. I've already
created this repo and the *-content repo and both are cloned locally."
Mid-session pivot: "Let's capture approach A as an epic in Gitea and create a
single Feature, which I'd like you to recommend as the first tiny thing we can
build that gets the scaffolding in place and on track. It isn't a shippable
thing — just proof of concept that gives us a starting point."
## Pre-state
- Two brand-new, empty repos cloned locally (`.git` only, no commits):
`vscode-cowriting-plugin` and `vscode-cowriting-plugin-content`, under
`benstull/` on `git.benstull.org`.
- No `app.json`, so the repo was not yet a registered Wiggleverse app.
- Local clone remotes used stale aliases (`vs-code-cowriting-plugin`,
`vs-cowriting-plugin-content`) that Gitea 301-redirects to the canonical
`vscode-cowriting-plugin(-content)`.
## The arc
1. **Session gate / classification.** Opened as planning-and-executing; used the
`superpowers:brainstorming` skill to explore intent because the request was
greenfield and underspecified.
2. **Discovery — what the app actually is.** "Flotilla" turned out not to map:
the `launch-app` suite is for GCP-deployed standard-stack webapps, none of
which applies to a no-infra VS Code extension. "Similar to the Claude plugin"
+ "the RFC app experience" + "built on Clide" resolved, after clarification,
to: the **inner-loop coauthoring experience** from `ben.stull/rfc-app#48`,
delivered as a VS Code extension on local files. "Clide" was a typo for
**Cline** (github.com/cline/cline) — the open-source coding-agent extension.
3. **Architecture decision (Approach A).** Researched Cline: it ships
`@cline/sdk` (programmatic agent API + plugin/tool registration + MCP,
Apache-2.0). That makes a **standalone extension on `@cline/sdk`** the clean
answer to rfc-app#48's open Q2 (standalone vs. fork vs. companion) — no fork,
own coauthoring UI. Operator chose **scaffold + register only** as the scope.
4. **Pivot to capture.** Operator updated the plugin (0.24.0 → 0.27.0) for the
new `wgl-capture` skill and asked to capture Approach A as a Gitea **Epic** +
one first **Feature** (a recommended tiny POC), rather than scaffold directly.
Switched into a `capture` session.
5. **App registration + naming reconciliation.** Authored `app.json` (no CLI
emits it). Discovered via a Gitea 301 that the canonical repo names are
`vscode-cowriting-plugin(-content)`, not the alias remotes. Operator confirmed
the canonical **One Name `vscode-cowriting-plugin`**. Reconciled: `app.json`
(app + both repos), both local remotes, and the local transcript dir; pushed
`app.json` to `main` (rebased over the claim's `sessions/0001` placeholder).
6. **Token blocker.** Filing needed a `git.benstull.org` token with the `issue`
scope; none existed (the wiggleverse issue token 401s cross-host; the existing
per-host benstull token 403s on issues/labels). Operator created a dedicated
token stored in Keychain as `wgl-gitea-issues-readwrite-token-git.benstull.org`.
7. **Filed the issues.** Ensured the capture taxonomy labels, then filed:
- **#1** `type/epic` `priority/P1` — "VS Code coauthoring plugin built on
Cline (`@cline/sdk`)".
- **#2** `type/feature` `priority/P1` — "POC: runnable extension skeleton that
drives `@cline/sdk`" (parent #1; #1's decomposition links back to #2).
The recommended first Feature (#2): the smallest non-shippable POC — repo
builds, F5 launches the Extension Development Host with the extension active,
one command drives `@cline/sdk` and shows a result — validating Approach A and
becoming the skeleton F2F5 (threads, attribution, git-native persistence)
land in.
## Cut state
- `app.json` committed + pushed to `benstull/vscode-cowriting-plugin@main`
(canonical One Name). Working tree clean.
- Gitea issues **#1** (Epic) and **#2** (Feature) filed and cross-linked on
`benstull/vscode-cowriting-plugin`.
- Capture taxonomy labels created on the tracker.
- Draft issue files left **uncommitted** in
`vscode-cowriting-plugin-content/issues/` (`coauthoring-plugin-on-cline.md`,
`poc-extension-cline-sdk.md`) — the Author's to commit/publish or discard
(capture INV-8).
- No code scaffolded yet (deferred by scope).
## Operator plate
- Both repos are **public** on Gitea — confirm if unintended (handbook treats
public as a deliberate exception).
- The two draft files remain uncommitted in the content repo — publish or discard.
- Memory note was intentionally skipped at the operator's request.
## Next-session prompt
```
/goal Build Feature #2 (the POC): scaffold a standalone VS Code extension on @cline/sdk in benstull/vscode-cowriting-plugin — repo builds, F5 launches the Extension Development Host with the extension active, and one command drives @cline/sdk and shows a result. Per issues #2 (parent epic #1) and rfc-app#48. Non-shippable proof-of-concept skeleton only.
```
## Deferred decisions
_No low-confidence autonomous calls this session — the operator confirmed the
One Name, the scope (scaffold + register only), Approach A, and the filing._