Files
rfc-app/backend/tests/test_multi_project_authz_vertical.py
T
Ben Stull 1dab24eef0 Merge feat/multi-project (§22 M1+M2) into main
Integrates the multi-project work so far — the §22 design drafts, M1 (the
schema spine), and M2 (project-scoped authorization + the §22.7 resolver) —
on top of the v0.32.0 retire/§13 changes that landed on main meanwhile.

Integration decisions:
- Renumbered the M1 projects migration 025_projects.sql -> 026_projects.sql.
  v0.32.0 shipped 025_retired_state.sql, which rebuilds cached_rfcs and
  predates the project_id column; running projects *after* the retire rebuild
  is required so project_id survives on a fresh database (the runner applies
  *.sql in filename order). Comment/doc references bumped to match.
- Resolved the get_rfc conflict in api.py by composing both gates: compute the
  viewer once, apply the §22.5 visibility gate, then v0.32.0's §13.7
  retired-entry owner-only check.
- api_graduation.py / api_discussion.py auto-merged cleanly (M2's threaded
  viewer/visibility gate coexists with the new retire endpoints + retired
  state).

Full suite 401 passed on a fresh DB.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-03 04:56:39 -07:00

348 lines
14 KiB
Python

"""Slice M2 — project-scoped authorization + the §22.7 resolver.
M1 laid the schema spine (the `projects` / `project_members` tables and the
`project_id` column on every slug-bearing table). M2 builds the resolver on top:
the most-permissive union of the deployment role (§6.1), the project role
(§22.6), and the per-RFC authority (§6.3/§12), with the §22.5 visibility gate
subtractive on top (§22.7).
Two operator decisions are pinned here as executable expectations:
* implicit-on-public — a granted deployment `contributor` keeps its
pre-multi-project write *baseline* on a `public` project (propose freely;
an owned RFC's discuss/contribute still needs the per-RFC invite) with no
project_members row. So the single public default project behaves exactly
as it did before M2 (verified across the rest of the suite, and the
`*_public_*` tests below).
* preserve curation — the implicit-public baseline does NOT override per-RFC
owner curation; only an *explicit* project_contributor/admin grant (or a
deployment owner/admin) bypasses it.
Everything is exercised on the single `default` project by flipping its
visibility and granting/revoking `project_members` roles — the M2 slice is
verifiable without a second project (which arrives with M3's registry mirror).
"""
from __future__ import annotations
from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
from test_propose_vertical import ( # noqa: F401 — fixtures land via import
app_with_fake_gitea,
provision_user_row,
sign_in_as,
tmp_env,
)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Helpers
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def _su(user_id: int, login: str, role: str, *, state: str = "granted"):
"""A SessionUser handle for direct resolver calls (the endpoint tests use
sign_in_as instead)."""
from app import auth
return auth.SessionUser(
user_id=user_id,
gitea_id=user_id,
gitea_login=login,
display_name=login.capitalize(),
email=f"{login}@test",
avatar_url="",
role=role,
permission_state=state,
)
def _set_visibility(project_id: str, visibility: str) -> None:
from app import db
db.conn().execute(
"UPDATE projects SET visibility = ? WHERE id = ?", (visibility, project_id)
)
def _add_member(project_id: str, user_id: int, role: str) -> None:
from app import db
db.conn().execute(
"INSERT OR REPLACE INTO project_members (project_id, user_id, role) VALUES (?, ?, ?)",
(project_id, user_id, role),
)
def _remove_member(project_id: str, user_id: int) -> None:
from app import db
db.conn().execute(
"DELETE FROM project_members WHERE project_id = ? AND user_id = ?",
(project_id, user_id),
)
def _seed_rfc(slug: str, *, state: str = "active", owners=None, project_id: str = "default") -> None:
"""A minimal cached_rfcs row — enough for the authz gates (state, owners,
project_id). project_id defaults to 'default' via migration 026 but we set
it explicitly for clarity."""
import json
from app import db
db.conn().execute(
"""
INSERT OR REPLACE INTO cached_rfcs
(slug, title, state, owners_json, arbiters_json, tags_json, project_id)
VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, '[]', '[]', ?)
""",
(slug, slug.capitalize(), state, json.dumps(owners or []), project_id),
)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# 1. The §22.7 resolver — tier composition
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def test_resolver_public_project_tiers(app_with_fake_gitea):
from app import auth
app, _ = app_with_fake_gitea
with TestClient(app):
provision_user_row(user_id=1, login="alice", role="contributor")
provision_user_row(user_id=2, login="ben", role="owner")
contributor = _su(1, "alice", "contributor")
owner = _su(2, "ben", "owner")
# default is public — read open to everyone incl. anonymous.
assert auth.can_read_project(None, "default") is True
assert auth.can_read_project(contributor, "default") is True
# implicit-on-public: a granted deployment contributor carries the
# write baseline without a project_members row.
assert auth.can_contribute_in_project(contributor, "default") is True
assert auth.can_discuss_in_project(contributor, "default") is True
# ... but it is NOT project_admin (curation/override authority).
assert auth.is_project_superuser(contributor, "default") is False
# a deployment owner/admin is a superuser in every project.
assert auth.is_project_superuser(owner, "default") is True
# a pending contributor has no write standing (the §6 admission floor).
pending = _su(1, "alice", "contributor", state="pending")
assert auth.can_contribute_in_project(pending, "default") is False
def test_resolver_gated_project_requires_membership(app_with_fake_gitea):
from app import auth
app, _ = app_with_fake_gitea
with TestClient(app):
provision_user_row(user_id=1, login="alice", role="contributor")
provision_user_row(user_id=2, login="ben", role="owner")
_set_visibility("default", "gated")
contributor = _su(1, "alice", "contributor")
owner = _su(2, "ben", "owner")
# gated: no membership → invisible and no standing.
assert auth.can_read_project(None, "default") is False
assert auth.can_read_project(contributor, "default") is False
assert auth.can_contribute_in_project(contributor, "default") is False
# deployment owner is a superuser regardless of membership.
assert auth.can_read_project(owner, "default") is True
assert auth.is_project_superuser(owner, "default") is True
# project_viewer → read + discuss, but not contribute.
_add_member("default", 1, "project_viewer")
assert auth.can_read_project(contributor, "default") is True
assert auth.can_discuss_in_project(contributor, "default") is True
assert auth.can_contribute_in_project(contributor, "default") is False
# project_contributor → contribute.
_add_member("default", 1, "project_contributor")
assert auth.can_contribute_in_project(contributor, "default") is True
assert auth.is_project_superuser(contributor, "default") is False
# project_admin → superuser within the project.
_add_member("default", 1, "project_admin")
assert auth.is_project_superuser(contributor, "default") is True
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# 2. Public default unchanged — the regression floor (curation preserved)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def test_public_per_rfc_curation_preserved(app_with_fake_gitea):
"""On the public default project a granted contributor still cannot
discuss an *owned* RFC without a per-RFC invite (the v0.16.0 contract);
but an unclaimed (no-owners) entry stays open. This is the implicit-public
baseline with curation preserved."""
from app import auth
app, _ = app_with_fake_gitea
with TestClient(app):
provision_user_row(user_id=1, login="alice", role="contributor")
provision_user_row(user_id=2, login="bob", role="contributor")
bob = _su(2, "bob", "contributor")
_seed_rfc("owned", state="active", owners=["alice"])
assert auth.can_discuss_rfc(bob, "owned") is False
assert auth.can_contribute_to_rfc(bob, "owned") is False
_seed_rfc("draft", state="super-draft", owners=[])
assert auth.can_discuss_rfc(bob, "draft") is True
assert auth.can_contribute_to_rfc(bob, "draft") is True
def test_public_read_open_write_gated_endpoints(app_with_fake_gitea):
app, _ = app_with_fake_gitea
with TestClient(app) as client:
provision_user_row(user_id=2, login="bob", role="contributor")
_seed_rfc("ohm", state="active", owners=["alice"])
# anonymous can read the entry on a public project.
r = client.get("/api/rfcs/ohm")
assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
# anonymous cannot open a discussion thread (401, the §6 write floor).
r = client.post("/api/rfcs/ohm/discussion/threads", json={"message": "hi"})
assert r.status_code == 401
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# 3. The §22.5 visibility gate — 404 to non-members on read
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def test_gated_project_404s_non_members(app_with_fake_gitea):
app, _ = app_with_fake_gitea
with TestClient(app) as client:
provision_user_row(user_id=1, login="alice", role="contributor")
provision_user_row(user_id=2, login="bob", role="contributor")
provision_user_row(user_id=3, login="ben", role="owner")
_seed_rfc("sekret", state="active", owners=["alice"])
_set_visibility("default", "gated")
# anonymous → 404 (indistinguishable from an unknown slug).
assert client.get("/api/rfcs/sekret").status_code == 404
# signed-in non-member → 404 on the entry and its discussion.
sign_in_as(client, user_id=2, gitea_login="bob", display_name="Bob", role="contributor")
assert client.get("/api/rfcs/sekret").status_code == 404
assert client.get("/api/rfcs/sekret/discussion/threads").status_code == 404
# the gated entry never surfaces in the non-member's catalog.
assert client.get("/api/rfcs").json()["items"] == []
# a project_viewer member can read again.
_add_member("default", 2, "project_viewer")
assert client.get("/api/rfcs/sekret").status_code == 200
assert [i["slug"] for i in client.get("/api/rfcs").json()["items"]] == ["sekret"]
# a deployment owner can always read.
sign_in_as(client, user_id=3, gitea_login="ben", display_name="Ben", role="owner")
assert client.get("/api/rfcs/sekret").status_code == 200
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# 4. The contribution gate on a gated project (401/403)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def test_gated_propose_requires_project_contributor(app_with_fake_gitea):
"""Propose checks project-level contribute standing before any Gitea
work, so the gate is observable as a 403 (gated, non-member) without
seeding the success path."""
app, _ = app_with_fake_gitea
with TestClient(app) as client:
provision_user_row(user_id=2, login="bob", role="contributor")
_set_visibility("default", "gated")
sign_in_as(client, user_id=2, gitea_login="bob", display_name="Bob", role="contributor")
body = {"slug": "newidea", "title": "New Idea", "pitch": "A pitch.", "tags": []}
assert client.post("/api/rfcs/propose", json=body).status_code == 403
# grant project_contributor — the project gate now passes (the request
# proceeds past the gate; we assert only that it is no longer 403).
_add_member("default", 2, "project_contributor")
assert client.post("/api/rfcs/propose", json=body).status_code != 403
def test_gated_viewer_can_discuss_contributor_can_contribute(app_with_fake_gitea):
from app import auth
app, _ = app_with_fake_gitea
with TestClient(app) as client:
provision_user_row(user_id=2, login="bob", role="contributor")
_seed_rfc("spec", state="super-draft", owners=[])
_set_visibility("default", "gated")
bob = _su(2, "bob", "contributor")
# non-member: discussion thread create → 404 (visibility, before the
# write gate even applies).
sign_in_as(client, user_id=2, gitea_login="bob", display_name="Bob", role="contributor")
assert client.post("/api/rfcs/spec/discussion/threads", json={"message": "q"}).status_code == 404
# project_viewer: can discuss (200) but cannot contribute (resolver).
_add_member("default", 2, "project_viewer")
r = client.post("/api/rfcs/spec/discussion/threads", json={"message": "q"})
assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
assert auth.can_contribute_to_rfc(bob, "spec") is False
# project_contributor: can contribute.
_add_member("default", 2, "project_contributor")
assert auth.can_contribute_to_rfc(bob, "spec") is True
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# 5. Union of tiers + subtractive visibility gate
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def test_per_rfc_authority_unions_then_yields_to_visibility(app_with_fake_gitea):
from app import auth
from test_propose_vertical import grant_rfc_collaborator
app, _ = app_with_fake_gitea
with TestClient(app):
provision_user_row(user_id=2, login="bob", role="contributor")
_seed_rfc("owned", state="active", owners=["alice"])
bob = _su(2, "bob", "contributor")
# public + per-RFC collaborator(contributor) → contribute (union term).
grant_rfc_collaborator(user_id=2, rfc_slug="owned", role_in_rfc="contributor")
assert auth.can_contribute_to_rfc(bob, "owned") is True
# flip to gated: the §22.5 gate is subtractive — the per-RFC grant no
# longer suffices without project membership.
_set_visibility("default", "gated")
assert auth.can_contribute_to_rfc(bob, "owned") is False
# restore read via project membership → the per-RFC union applies again.
_add_member("default", 2, "project_viewer")
assert auth.can_contribute_to_rfc(bob, "owned") is True
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# 6. Revocation takes effect on the next call
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def test_revoking_membership_revokes_access(app_with_fake_gitea):
from app import auth
app, _ = app_with_fake_gitea
with TestClient(app):
provision_user_row(user_id=2, login="bob", role="contributor")
_set_visibility("default", "gated")
bob = _su(2, "bob", "contributor")
_add_member("default", 2, "project_contributor")
assert auth.can_contribute_in_project(bob, "default") is True
_remove_member("default", 2)
assert auth.can_read_project(bob, "default") is False
assert auth.can_contribute_in_project(bob, "default") is False