Ben Stull 886bbf5512 Contribute rewrite Phase 4: §8.10 gutter accent in CM6 raw pane
Restores the §8.10 paragraph-margin marker layer Phase 1 dropped when
Tiptap left, this time against the CM6 raw pane on the left half of
the Contribute split. The matching inline tracked-insert/tracked-
delete overlay Phase 3 shipped lives on the preview pane to the
right; the two visual layers answer different questions on the two
halves of the split — "did anything change in this region?" (gutter,
amber, scannable) vs. "what changed here?" (inline, green/red,
precise) — and are deliberately separate signals.

New file: frontend/src/components/diffGutterExtension.js. The
extension exposes a `setBaseline` StateEffect and a gutter that marks
every line whose text differs from the same-indexed line of the
baseline (the last server-confirmed branch body). Per-line, not
paragraph-block — CM6's natural unit; collapsing to paragraph ranges
is more spec-faithful but adds code, and the per-line stance is the
pre-fancy default. A TODO is left for a future paragraph-collapse
pass if the result reads noisy.

MarkdownSourceEditor.jsx changes:
- Install the gutter extension in the editor's extension list.
- Seed the baseline to `initialDoc` at construct time.
- In the existing `initialDoc`-watching effect, dispatch the doc
  replacement AND a `setBaseline` effect in the SAME transaction so
  there's no one-frame window where the new doc reads as "divergent"
  against the old baseline. This carries through every server-
  confirmed branch refresh that RFCView already wires (accept,
  decline, manual flush, branch switch); no RFCView changes needed
  because all four paths already re-push `initialDoc` after pulling
  fresh state.

Design calls per the Phase 4 prompt's open list:
  • Per-line marks, not paragraph-block ranges. Pre-fancy stance.
  • Amber (#f59e0b) thin 3px vertical bar, distinct from the
    preview pane's green-on-light / red-on-light tracked-change
    inline overlay. Reads as "in-flight / not yet on the server."
  • Baseline reset on every branchView refresh (accept / decline /
    manual flush / branch switch), matching RFCView's existing
    originalSourceLinesRef discipline. Gutter then reads as "what's
    in the buffer but not on the server."
  • No hover / no click. The inline overlay already carries the
    click-to-card binding; the gutter is scannable only.

Known caveats kept deliberately:
  • Insert/delete shifts. Adding a line in the middle shifts every
    subsequent line's index and the naive compare lights up
    everything below — tolerated as the honest "you've touched
    stuff below this point" cue. A future LCS-anchored pass could
    fix it; Phase 4 doesn't need to.

SPEC §8.10:
- First paragraph rewritten to name the CM6 raw pane as the gutter's
  home and replace the stale "ProseMirror plugin" wording with the
  CodeMirror gutter framing. Mirrors how Phase 3 named the preview
  pane as the inline overlay's home.
- DiffView retirement paragraph adjusted: gutter and inline overlay
  together (across the split) cover its review affordance, not
  "both layers in the same surface" — the layers are deliberately on
  different surfaces.

Verification:
- Vite preview sandbox eval — standalone CM6 mount, dispatch tests
  across construct (no marks on identity), per-line edit (mark on
  exactly the touched line, confirmed by Y-coordinate matching the
  line-number gutter element), baseline reset clears, atomic
  doc+baseline dispatch leaves zero marks (the RFCView accept-flow
  path), insert-in-middle exhibits the expected cascade, and
  computed-style proof for the amber bar (`#f59e0b`, 3px wide,
  positioned left of the line-numbers gutter at x=21 vs x=24).
- Screenshot captures the bar on the touched line only.
- 125 backend integration tests still green.
- Live RFCView accept → branch refresh → gutter clear flow against a
  real branch was not driven (backend not running this session,
  carrying forward Phase 2/3's verification gap). The sandbox-level
  proof covers the atomic dispatch correctness; the next session
  with a backend up should drive that golden path before piling
  Phase 5 work on top.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-25 11:00:45 -07:00
2026-05-24 05:10:50 -07:00

RFC App

A single-process FastAPI + SQLite + React + Vite + Tiptap app that materializes the Wiggleverse RFC framework specified in SPEC.md. The framework's mission lives in PHILOSOPHY.md; the spec is the binding contract; this README is how to bring the app up against a local Gitea instance and exercise the surface the build has shipped.

The v1 build is complete. Subsequent sessions pick from §19.2 by user choice per §19.3's working agreement. See docs/DEV.md for the build history and the work mode that follows v1.

What the app expects to talk to

  • A Gitea instance at GITEA_URL. The instance hosts the meta repository and (eventually) one repository per graduated RFC.
  • A bot service account in that Gitea, with a personal access token in GITEA_BOT_TOKEN. Per §1 the bot is the only writer in the system — every commit, branch, and PR the app produces flows through one wrapper that applies the §6.5 On-behalf-of: trailer and records a row in the actions audit log.
  • An OAuth2 application registered against that Gitea, with the callback URL set to {APP_URL}/auth/callback. Real human users authenticate via Gitea OAuth (the §18 carryover); the app reads their Gitea profile, provisions a row in users, and layers §6's app-owned permission model on top.

Local bring-up

The shortest path from a clean checkout to a working app is:

1. Stand up a local Gitea

Anything that exposes the Gitea REST API works. The fastest path is Docker:

docker run -d --name gitea \
  -p 3000:3000 -p 222:22 \
  -v gitea-data:/data \
  gitea/gitea:1.21

Open http://localhost:3000, walk through the install wizard (SQLite, default port), and create your owner-zero account.

2. Create the bot service account

In Gitea, sign in as your owner account and Site Administration → User Accounts → Create User Account. Give it a name like rfc-bot and an email. Then sign in as the bot, open Settings → Applications → Generate New Token, and grant it the write:repository, write:user, and write:admin scopes (admin is needed because the bot will create per-RFC repos on graduation; in v1 you can scope down to repo and org if you want to defer admin until Slice 5).

Copy the token; you will paste it into .env.

3. Create the org that will host the meta repo

The seed script creates the meta repo inside an org. Create the org (e.g. wiggleverse) in Gitea and add rfc-bot to it as an Owner.

4. Register the OAuth2 application

In Gitea: Site Administration → Integrations → OAuth2 Applications → Create. Name it whatever you like, set the redirect URI to http://localhost:8000/auth/callback. Copy the client id and client secret — they go into .env.

5. Configure the app

cd backend
cp .env.example .env
$EDITOR .env    # fill in every variable

Required values:

Variable What it is
GITEA_URL Base URL of the Gitea instance (no trailing slash).
GITEA_BOT_USER The bot account's login.
GITEA_BOT_TOKEN The bot account's access token.
GITEA_ORG The org that owns the meta repo.
META_REPO The meta repo's name (default meta).
OAUTH_CLIENT_ID From the OAuth app you registered.
OAUTH_CLIENT_SECRET Likewise.
APP_URL The URL the app is reachable at locally.
SECRET_KEY A long random string for cookie signing.
OWNER_GITEA_LOGIN Your owner-zero Gitea login — gets the owner role on first sign-in.
GITEA_WEBHOOK_SECRET A shared secret for the §4.1 webhook signature.

Optional values, picked up at process start:

Variable What it is
ENABLED_MODELS Comma-separated provider keys for §18 chat (e.g. claude,gemini).
ANTHROPIC_API_KEY etc. Per-provider keys; missing keys disable that provider.
SMTP_HOST / SMTP_PORT §15.4 transactional-email adapter target. Empty falls back to logging the envelope to stdout — sufficient for dev and integration tests.
SMTP_USER / SMTP_PASSWORD SMTP auth credentials. Optional alongside SMTP_HOST.
SMTP_STARTTLS 1 (default) to negotiate STARTTLS; 0 for plaintext.
EMAIL_FROM Envelope From address for §15.4 mail. Defaults to a non-routable placeholder.
EMAIL_FROM_NAME Display name on the From header (default Wiggleverse).
EMAIL_ENABLED 1 (default) to dispatch email; 0 to suppress all sends without disabling the inbox.
EMAIL_BUNDLE_THRESHOLD Held-during-quiet-hours threshold for the "Activity while you were away" bundle (default 5, §15.4).
DIGEST_TICK_SECONDS Cadence of the §15.5 digest scheduler's loop (default 3600). Tests drive ticks synchronously via digest.run_tick.
HYGIENE_TICK_SECONDS Cadence of the §12 hygiene scheduler's loop (default 3600). Tests drive ticks via hygiene.run_tick(now=...).
WEBHOOK_EMAIL_BOUNCE_SECRET When set, /api/webhooks/email-bounce requires the same value in the X-Webhook-Secret header. Unset leaves the webhook open for dev — the v1 contract.

6. Install dependencies

Backend:

cd backend
python3 -m venv .venv
.venv/bin/pip install -r requirements.txt

Frontend:

cd ../frontend
npm install

7. Seed the meta repo

The seed script creates wiggleverse/meta if it does not exist, populates it with PHILOSOPHY.md, README.md, CONTRIBUTING.md, the regenerate-index workflow placeholder, and an empty rfcs/ directory, and registers the Gitea webhook the app needs:

cd backend
.venv/bin/python ../scripts/seed_meta_repo.py

Re-running is safe — every step is upsert-shaped.

8. Run the app

In two terminals:

# Terminal 1 — backend
cd backend
.venv/bin/uvicorn app.main:app --reload --port 8000
# Terminal 2 — frontend
cd frontend
npm run dev

Open http://localhost:5173. Sign in with your owner-zero Gitea account. The catalog should appear empty; the + Propose New RFC button at the bottom opens the propose modal.

What the build lets you do

Slices 18 are shipped — v1 is complete. End-to-end paths the app supports:

  • Propose → idea PR → merge → super-draft (Slice 1, §9.1–§9.3).
  • Super-draft body editing via meta-repo edit branches, with AI participation, the change-card panel, manual flushes, threads, flags, and DiffView (Slice 4, §9.5–§9.7 + §8 inherited).
  • The §8 active-RFC view in full: per-branch chat, AI participation through the <change> protocol, accept / decline / edit, manual-edit flushes, sub-threads, flags, DiffView (Slice 2, §8 in full).
  • The §10 PR flow against both per-RFC repos and meta-repo edit branches: open, AI-drafted title and description, the §10.3 review page with the per-user seen-cursor, review threads, merge, withdraw, the §10.9 conflict-replay path (Slice 3 + Slice 4's routing-collapse extension, §10 in full).
  • §13 graduation with the three-field dialog, the precondition popover for blocking body-edit PRs, the SSE-streamed five-step sequence, rollback on mid-sequence failure, and the §9.8 pre-graduation history affordance on the new RFC view (Slice 5, §13 in full).
  • §13.1 ownership claim as a meta-repo PR adding the claimant to the entry's owners: field; admin/owner merges the PR (Slice 5).
  • §15 notifications end-to-end: a producer-side chokepoint in notify.py fans out from actions (and from chat-message inserts that don't go through the bot) into notifications rows under §15.1's routing rules; §15.6 watches auto-set on the first substantive gesture and decay after 90 days; the header badge and the /inbox overlay back the live counter via an SSE stream per §15.3; toasts fire for personal-direct events and for events landing on the view the user is currently watching; §15.4 email opts in per category with one-click unsubscribe and a global opt-out wired to the bounce webhook; §15.5 weekly / daily digest assembles eligible churn into a single mail; §15.7 reconciles unread state when a scope cursor advances; §15.8 quiet hours hold email and digest while letting the inbox row still land, and the per-user mute suppresses inbox rows produced by a specific actor (Slice 6).
  • §14 chrome and the settings / admin neighbourhoods — the landing page with the three-item deck, the /philosophy route reading PHILOSOPHY.md from disk, the persistent About header link, /settings/notifications exposing the five §15-derived sub-sections, and /admin as the four-tab home base for role management, write-mute, audit-log, graduation-queue, and the §6.5 permission-events read (Slice 7).
  • §12 branch hygiene + §10.7 post-merge deletion — the 30/90-day timers ride on a scheduler next to the digest, the bot is the only Git writer per §1, and the audit-log rows surface as "the app" actor per §15.9. The §19.2 candidates the hardening pass folded in: cache bootstrap against a meta repo the bot did not author, branch-name path routing via {branch:path}, in-app merge for meta_metadata PRs, the graduation-rollback branch cleanup, and the email-bounce webhook signing seam (Slice 8).

This exercises the §4 cache (webhook + reconciler), the §6 permission model in full, the §1 bot wrapper (every Git write goes through it, every commit and PR carries the On-behalf-of: trailer), the §17 routing-collapse rule that lets active and super-draft surfaces share their endpoints, and three scheduled jobs in the same shape (reconciler, digest, hygiene).

Out of scope for v1: every item under §16 ("What is deliberately deferred"), and the §19.2 candidates the hardening pass left queued. Subsequent sessions pick from §19.2 by user choice per §19.3's working agreement.

Verifying it worked

After bring-up:

  • http://localhost:8000/docs lists the API routes the build session has wired so far.
  • sqlite3 backend/data/rfc-app.db .schema shows the §5 schema.
  • gitea ls /api/v1/repos/wiggleverse/meta/contents/rfcs after a proposal merges should show one new <slug>.md.

Seeding an active RFC for §8 testing

With Slice 5 shipped, the /graduate flow in the app is the canonical path from super-draft to active. The scripts/seed_test_rfc.py shortcut is still around for dev sessions that want an active RFC without running the §9.1 propose flow and the §13 graduation dialog by hand. Sign in once via OAuth so a users row exists, then:

cd backend && .venv/bin/python ../scripts/seed_test_rfc.py \
    --slug open-human-model \
    --title "Open Human Model"

The script creates wiggleverse/rfc-NNNN-<slug>, seeds RFC.md on main, registers the webhook, and graduates the meta entry as a bootstrap-only direct write. The §8 surface at /rfc/<slug> then has something real to render.

Troubleshooting

  • The catalog stays empty after a merge. Check that the webhook is reaching the app: the reconciler runs every five minutes and will catch up, but a missing or misconfigured webhook is the most common reason for sub-second freshness to fail. The seed script registers the webhook for you; if you bring up Gitea on a different host (e.g. a Codespace, a tunnel), re-run the seed against the new APP_URL.
  • OAuth callback errors. The redirect URI in Gitea has to match APP_URL exactly, including the protocol and port.
  • The bot can't merge. The bot needs Maintainer or Owner on the meta repo (membership in GITEA_ORG as Owner gives it both).

Where to read further

  • SPEC.md — the binding contract. Every load-bearing decision is there.
  • PHILOSOPHY.md — why this framework exists. The spec's decisions answer to it.
  • docs/DEV.md — the build's slicing plan, the current state, and the next slice's brief.
  • deploy/RUNBOOK.md — single-host production bring-up, day-2 operations (logs, database backup, secret rotation, the §12 hygiene cadence), and rollback shape.
S
Description
Open-source RFC platform software
Readme 589 KiB
Languages
Python 66.2%
JavaScript 21.9%
HTML 5.9%
CSS 5.8%
Shell 0.2%