Compare commits

...

2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Ben Stull 8f3a8ec33a Release 0.10.0: user-set passcodes (OTC stays as fallback)
After a successful OTC sign-in, a contributor can set a passcode
(4-20 characters, bcrypt-hashed) and use email + passcode for
subsequent sign-ins. OTC remains the structural fallback: five
consecutive failed verifies lock the passcode path for 15 minutes
(HTTP 423), and a forgotten passcode is recovered by requesting a
fresh code. Migration 015_passcode.sql adds four nullable columns
to the users table; existing rows pass through as OTC-only and can
opt into a passcode from a new Sign-in tab in /settings/notifications.
The /login surface is extended to a five-step flow (email → either
passcode or OTC code → optional post-OTC passcode offer → optional
set-passcode). SPEC corrections per §19.3 rule 2: §6 names the
three auth paths, §14.1 documents the stepped login flow, §17 lists
the four new /auth/passcode/* endpoints, §19.2 surfaces four new
candidates and refreshes the cross-refs.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-28 02:24:38 -07:00
Ben Stull 8aa65014b4 Release 0.13.0: cookie/privacy consent banner + policy pages (instrumentation prep)
Roadmap item #11. Ships the non-modal bottom-of-page cookie consent
banner, the default /privacy and /cookies policy pages, the
`cookie_consent` table + two §17 endpoints for server-side persistence,
the localStorage fallback for anonymous viewers, the /settings
"Privacy & cookies" tab for revisiting the choice, and the
`frontend/src/lib/consent.js` helper that roadmap item #13's analytics
SDK (v0.15.0) will gate against. No analytics SDK ships in this release
— the consent infrastructure goes in first so the gate is already in
place. Adds SPEC §14.5 / §14.6, lists two new endpoints in §17, names
the new table in §5, and surfaces four §19.2 candidates (content-repo
file vs env-var policy, GPC / DNT headers, i18n, item-#13 dependency).
Two new optional env vars (`VITE_PRIVACY_POLICY_URL`,
`VITE_COOKIES_POLICY_URL`) — defaults render the framework's stub
pages.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-28 01:08:23 -07:00
23 changed files with 3142 additions and 62 deletions
+242
View File
@@ -23,6 +23,247 @@ skip versions are the composition of each intervening adjacent
release's steps in order — no A-to-B path is pre-computed beyond
that.
## 0.10.0 — 2026-05-28
**Minor — schema migration required; new auth path is additive.**
This release lands user-set passcodes after OTC (roadmap item #8,
SPEC §6.2). After a successful one-time-code sign-in, the user can
set a passcode (420 characters) and use email + passcode for
subsequent sign-ins. OTC remains the structural fallback: a
forgotten passcode is recovered by requesting a fresh code, and
five consecutive failed passcode verifies lock the passcode path
for 15 minutes (HTTP 423) while leaving the OTC path open. The
`/login` surface now consults a new `GET /auth/passcode/check`
endpoint after the email step to decide whether to render a
passcode input or an OTC code input; an "Use a code instead" link
on the passcode step lets the user fall back to OTC manually. The
`/settings/notifications` page grew a new "Sign-in" tab where the
user can set, change, or remove their passcode.
### Upgrade steps (from 0.8.0)
1. **MUST** restart the backend so migration `015_passcode.sql`
runs. The migration adds four nullable columns to the `users`
table: `passcode_hash`, `passcode_set_at`,
`passcode_failed_attempts` (default 0), `passcode_locked_until`.
Existing rows pass through with `passcode_hash = NULL`, which
the runtime treats as "no passcode set" — every existing user
continues to sign in via OTC unchanged, and can opt into a
passcode from the new settings tab at any time.
2. **MUST** rebuild the frontend so the v0.10.0 `/login` flow and
the new settings tab ship. `frontend/package.json#version` and
`VERSION` both move to `0.10.0`.
3. **SHOULD** announce the new sign-in option to users. Wording
suggestion: "You can now set a passcode for faster sign-in.
We'll keep emailing one-time codes as a fallback — if you
forget your passcode, just request a code as usual."
4. **MAY** leave the §6.2 default lockout shape (5 attempts,
15-minute window) unchanged. v0.10.0 does not expose env
tunables for these; raising or lowering them lives in §19.2
as a candidate.
### Added
- **`POST /auth/passcode/set`** — authenticated. Body `{passcode}`.
Validates length (420) and refuses obvious patterns from a small
denylist (`0000`, `1234`, `aaaa`, `password`, etc.). bcrypt-hashes
the passcode and writes `users.passcode_hash` plus
`users.passcode_set_at`. Clears any active lockout and the
failure counter (a user setting a fresh passcode is implicitly
re-authenticating). Replaces any prior passcode.
- **`DELETE /auth/passcode`** — authenticated. Clears the passcode
hash and the set-at stamp; the user is back to OTC-only.
- **`POST /auth/passcode/verify`** — unauthenticated. Body
`{email, passcode}`. Returns HTTP 200 + minimal user payload on
success; HTTP 423 with `locked_until` when the account is in the
lockout window; HTTP 400 for every other failure (the
wrong-passcode and unknown-email modes both collapse to 400 so
the response does not enumerate account state).
- **`GET /auth/passcode/check`** — unauthenticated. Query param
`email`. Returns `{has_passcode: boolean}`. The Login.jsx flow
consults this after the email step to decide whether to render a
passcode input or fall back to OTC. The response carries only
the boolean; lockout state, the hash, and the `passcode_set_at`
stamp are not leaked. An unknown email and a known-without-
passcode email both return `false`, so the endpoint is
account-enumeration-safe.
- **Schema migration** `015_passcode.sql` — four ALTER TABLE ADD
COLUMN statements on the `users` table:
- `passcode_hash TEXT` (nullable) — the bcrypt hash. NULL means
"no passcode set".
- `passcode_set_at TEXT` (nullable) — ISO-8601 timestamp.
- `passcode_failed_attempts INTEGER NOT NULL DEFAULT 0`
consecutive failure counter since last success.
- `passcode_locked_until TEXT` (nullable) — lockout window
expiry; verify refuses with HTTP 423 while populated and
in the future.
- **`backend/app/passcode.py`** — the passcode state machine:
validation (length + denylist), bcrypt hashing, set/clear,
status check, and the verify path with lockout management.
- **`frontend/src/components/Login.jsx`** — extended to a five-step
surface: email → passcode-or-code → optional post-OTC
passcode-offer → optional set-passcode. The "Use a code instead"
link on the passcode step re-dispatches an OTC and switches to
the code step. A 423 from passcode verify auto-falls back to OTC
with a visible status message.
- **"Sign-in" tab** in `/settings/notifications` — shows
passcode-set status, the recorded `passcode_set_at` stamp when
set, and Set / Change / Remove buttons. Mirrors the §14.5
"Privacy & cookies" tab pattern.
- **SPEC `§6` / `§14.1` / `§17` / `§19.2`** corrections per §19.3
rule 2:
- §6 names the three current auth paths (OTC, passcode-with-OTC-
fallback, OAuth-fallback-during-migration).
- §14.1 documents the stepped `/login` surface and the passcode
check endpoint.
- §17 lists the four new `/auth/passcode/*` endpoints.
- §19.2 surfaces four new candidates (passcode policy tunables
via env, per-IP rate-limit on `/auth/passcode/verify`,
passcode-change "old passcode" challenge, passkey/WebAuthn);
the "device-trust 30d" entry's passcode cross-ref is updated;
the "first-OTC profile capture" entry's roadmap cross-ref is
updated.
### Changed
- **`backend/app/main.py`** — registers the four new
`/auth/passcode/*` routes on the existing oauth router, alongside
the v0.7.0 `/auth/otc/*` routes.
- **`backend/app/api.py`** — `/api/auth/me` payload now includes
`has_passcode` (boolean) and `passcode_set_at` (string or null)
so the settings surface can render the Set / Change / Remove
affordances without a second round trip.
- **`frontend/src/api.js`** — adds `checkPasscode`, `verifyPasscode`,
`setPasscode`, `clearPasscode` helpers, neighboring the v0.7.0
`requestOtc` / `verifyOtc` block.
- **`frontend/src/components/NotificationSettings.jsx`** — adds the
`SignInSection` component between `MutesSection` and
`PrivacyCookiesSection`.
### Tests
- **`backend/tests/test_passcode_vertical.py`** — 17 new tests
cover: set requires session; check returns false for unknown and
for set-less users; check returns true after set without leaking
other fields; happy-path OTC → set → verify roundtrip; wrong
passcode increments the counter without locking; five consecutive
failures lock with 423 and persist `passcode_locked_until`;
lockout expires and the next attempt clears the counter; the OTC
path is unaffected by passcode lockout; clear wipes the hash and
set-at; setting a new passcode replaces the prior one and resets
the lockout; `passcode_set_at` updates on every set; validation
refuses too-short passcodes and denylist patterns; `/api/auth/me`
carries `has_passcode` and `passcode_set_at` correctly.
### Environment variables
None new. The existing `SECRET_KEY` continues to sign session
cookies; passcode hashing reuses the bcrypt dependency added in
v0.7.0. The lockout shape (5 attempts, 15 minutes) and the length
range (420) are hard-coded in `backend/app/passcode.py`. See
§19.2 for the env-tunable candidate.
## 0.13.0 — 2026-05-28
**Minor — schema migration required; new optional env vars.** This
release ships the cookie / privacy consent surface (roadmap item #11,
SPEC §14.5 / §14.6). Every viewer — authenticated and anonymous alike —
now sees a non-modal bottom-of-page banner on first visit asking which
categories of cookies they allow (essential / essential + analytics /
essential + analytics + other). The choice persists in `localStorage`
for anonymous viewers and in a new `cookie_consent` table for
authenticated viewers, with server-side overriding local on sign-in.
The framework also ships default `/privacy` and `/cookies` policy pages
that deployments can layer their own policy URL on top of via two new
optional env vars. No analytics SDK ships in this release — the
consent infrastructure is wired so item #13 (v0.15.0) can read from
`frontend/src/lib/consent.js` when the SDK lands.
### Added
- **Cookie consent banner** (`frontend/src/components/CookieConsentBanner.jsx`).
Non-modal, bottom of viewport. Three single-select choices with
inline descriptions. Visible until the user makes a choice; hides
thereafter. Reachable for revision via the settings surface.
- **Consent helper** (`frontend/src/lib/consent.js`). Exports
`getConsent()`, `hasChosen()`, `onConsentChange(cb)`, `setConsent()`,
`hydrateFromServer()`, `clearLocal()`. Cross-tab sync via the
`storage` event. Item #13's analytics SDK reads consent here before
importing.
- **Privacy and cookies policy pages**
(`frontend/src/pages/Privacy.jsx`, `frontend/src/pages/Cookies.jsx`).
Default minimal policies that describe the framework's stance and
list the cookies the framework sets. Deployments override via the
two new env vars below; the framework's stub always renders above
the link so the framework-level contract stays visible.
- **"Privacy & cookies" tab** in `/settings/notifications` showing
the current consent choice, the recorded-at stamp, and a "Change"
button that re-opens the banner via a custom DOM event.
- **`§17` endpoints** —
- `GET /api/users/me/cookie-consent` — read the current consent
record.
- `PUT /api/users/me/cookie-consent` — write a new consent record.
Upserts a single row per user, stamps `recorded_at` to now,
accepts `essential` for symmetry but always persists it as true.
- **Schema migration** `013_cookie_consent.sql` — new
`cookie_consent` table keyed by `user_id`, three flags
(`essential`, `analytics`, `other_cookies`), and `recorded_at`.
(Renumbered from `012_*` during driver integration because v0.7.0
also added a `012_otc.sql` migration that landed in the integration
order before this one.)
- **SPEC `§14.5` Cookie / privacy consent** — settles the banner
shape, the three-category single-select, the storage shape (local
for anon, server row for authenticated), the precedence rule on
sign-in, and the `consent.js` helper surface for downstream
callers including item #13.
- **SPEC `§14.6` Privacy and cookies policy pages** — settles the
`/privacy` and `/cookies` routes, the framework's stub content, and
the `VITE_PRIVACY_POLICY_URL` / `VITE_COOKIES_POLICY_URL` override
shape.
- **SPEC `§5`** — names the `cookie_consent` table in the canonical
app-tables list.
- **SPEC `§17`** — lists the two new cookie-consent endpoints.
- **SPEC `§19.2`** — surfaces four candidates: policy content via
content-repo file vs env var, GPC / DNT headers, multi-language
consent text, and the item #13 analytics-SDK gating dependency.
### Changed
- **`frontend/.env.example`** — documents the two new optional env
vars `VITE_PRIVACY_POLICY_URL` and `VITE_COOKIES_POLICY_URL`. Unset
is supported; defaults render the framework's stub.
- **`backend/app/api_notifications.py`** — module docstring grew two
endpoint lines; the new endpoints sit alongside the existing
`/api/users/me/*` neighbors.
- **`frontend/src/App.jsx`** — registers `/privacy` and `/cookies`
routes (anonymous-reachable), wires `<CookieConsentBanner>` into
the global chrome, and listens for a `rfc-app:cookie-consent-reopen`
custom event to re-open the banner from the settings surface.
### Upgrade steps (from 0.7.0)
- You **MUST** rebuild the frontend and restart the backend after
upgrading. `frontend/package.json#version` and `VERSION` both move
to `0.13.0` and the build embeds the new env-var contract.
- You **MUST** apply schema migration `013_cookie_consent.sql`. The
migration creates a single new table keyed by `user_id` with three
flag columns and a `recorded_at` stamp. The framework runs
migrations automatically at process start; no manual step is
required beyond restarting the backend so the migration runner
picks the file up.
- You **MAY** set `VITE_PRIVACY_POLICY_URL` to an http(s) URL that
points at your deployment's full privacy policy. The framework's
`/privacy` page renders its built-in stub above a link to the
configured URL. Unset is supported — the stub is sufficient for a
default-config deployment.
- You **MAY** set `VITE_COOKIES_POLICY_URL` to an http(s) URL that
points at your deployment's full cookies policy. Same shape as the
privacy URL.
- You **MAY** announce the new consent banner to your users. Existing
authenticated users will see the banner on their next visit
(because their `cookie_consent` row does not yet exist); their
current sessions remain valid.
## 0.7.0 — 2026-05-28
**Minor — schema migration required; new auth path is additive.**
@@ -257,6 +498,7 @@ explicit:
dependency changes; the operator's role is reduced to rebuild +
restart.
## 0.5.0 — 2026-05-27
**Minor — no operator action required.** This release wires the
+287 -35
View File
@@ -332,6 +332,13 @@ and exact columns are illustrative; the implementing session can adjust.
- `actions` — append-only audit log for every state transition, every
graduation, every grant change. Includes the acting user, the bot
commit hash if any, and the on-behalf-of trailer applied.
- `cookie_consent` — per-user record of the §14.5 cookie consent
choice. One row per user. Columns: `user_id` (PK, FK users), three
flags (`essential`, `analytics`, `other_cookies`), and
`recorded_at`. `essential` is permanently 1; `recorded_at` is set
on first write and updated on every change. Absence of a row means
"no choice yet" — the banner shows. Anonymous viewers persist their
choice in `localStorage` only, with no corresponding row here.
**Super-draft scoping.** For rows in `threads` and `changes` where the
entry referenced by `rfc_slug` is in state `super-draft`, `branch_name`
@@ -349,18 +356,37 @@ merge with no data movement.
Authorization is owned by the app. Gitea sees only the bot account.
Authentication, as of v0.7.0, is by email + one-time-code: a visitor
enters their email address, receives a six-digit code via SMTP, and
exchanges the code for a session. The Gitea OAuth callback that
v0.1 used as the human sign-in path remains as a migration fallback
during the v0.7.0 window — `users.gitea_id` is preserved on existing
rows so a grandfathered user signing in via either path resolves to
the same row — but the primary surface points at OTC. `users.email`
is the identity key for everything provisioned after v0.7.0;
`users.gitea_id` is the grandfathering linker (nullable, partial-
unique). The Gitea bot user + token are still required for server-
side git operations (repo reads, PR creation); only the operator-
facing sign-in surface moved.
Authentication has three paths, in the order a visitor encounters
them:
1. **Email + one-time code (OTC).** The v0.7.0 primary path: a
visitor enters their email address, receives a six-digit code via
SMTP, and exchanges the code for a session. Used by every visitor
on first sign-in, and as the fallback for the other two paths.
2. **Email + passcode (with OTC fallback).** Added in v0.10.0
(roadmap item #8). After a successful OTC sign-in, the visitor
may set a user-chosen passcode (420 characters, bcrypt-hashed at
rest) and use email + passcode on subsequent sign-ins. Five
consecutive failed verifies lock the passcode path for 15 minutes
(HTTP 423); during the lockout the user falls back to OTC. The
OTC path is unaffected by the passcode lockout, so a forgotten
passcode is recovered by requesting a fresh OTC — there is no
separate "forgot passcode" flow. The user can remove the passcode
at any time from the §6.2 sign-in settings tab, returning to
OTC-only.
3. **Gitea OAuth fallback (migration only).** The v0.1 OAuth
callback remains functional during the v0.7.0 window, with a
small "Sign in with Gitea (fallback)" link on `/login` so users
with active OAuth sessions or older invite paths still have a
way in. Scheduled for removal in a future release per §19.2.
`users.gitea_id` is preserved on existing rows so a grandfathered
user signing in via any of the three paths resolves to the same row.
`users.email` is the identity key for everything provisioned after
v0.7.0; `users.gitea_id` is the grandfathering linker (nullable,
partial-unique). The Gitea bot user + token are still required for
server-side git operations (repo reads, PR creation); only the
operator-facing sign-in surface moved.
### 6.1 Four roles, each a strict superset of the one below
@@ -1978,6 +2004,30 @@ with Gitea"; v0.7.0's email/OTC surface replaced that as the primary
gesture, with a small "Sign in with Gitea (fallback)" link surviving
on `/login` itself for the migration window.
`/login` itself is a stepped surface, driven by which auth path the
viewer is currently on (§6):
1. **Email step.** The viewer enters their email. The frontend
consults `GET /auth/passcode/check?email=…` to learn whether
this email has a passcode set. The check endpoint is
account-enumeration-safe — it returns `has_passcode: false` for
both "unknown email" and "known email without passcode", so a
probing client cannot distinguish the two from the response.
2. **Either the passcode step or the OTC code step.** If the email
has a passcode set, the viewer is asked for it (v0.10.0).
Otherwise an OTC is dispatched and the viewer is asked for the
six-digit code from their email (v0.7.0).
3. **Optional post-OTC passcode-offer step.** After a successful
OTC verify on an account with no passcode set, the surface
asks "Set a passcode for faster sign-in next time?" — the user
can dismiss the offer or set one inline. The skip-for-now path
redirects straight to `/`.
The passcode step carries a "Use a code instead" link that
re-dispatches an OTC and switches to the code step — the same path
the lockout response (HTTP 423) takes automatically after five
consecutive failed passcode verifies.
This is the front door. It sets expectation before the user encounters
the mechanics, so the mechanics (super-drafts, graduation, public
arguments, AI participation in chat) read as load-bearing rather than
@@ -2014,6 +2064,92 @@ The visual design of the landing page and the `/philosophy` route —
typography, layout, illustrations if any — is deferred. The structural
decisions above are the binding part.
### 14.5 Cookie / privacy consent (v0.13.0)
The framework ships a non-modal cookie consent banner reachable by
every viewer — authenticated and anonymous alike. The banner appears
at the bottom of the viewport on first load and stays visible until
the user makes a choice, after which it hides and the choice is
persisted. The `/settings/notifications` page carries a "Privacy &
cookies" tab that surfaces the current choice and re-opens the banner
on demand.
The choice has three categories, presented as a single-select:
- **Essential only** — the framework's strictly-necessary cookies
(sign-in session, signed payloads, the consent-choice record
itself). Always on; the user cannot switch this off because the
app cannot function without it.
- **Essential + analytics** — adds the optional analytics layer
gated by this choice. As of v0.13.0 no analytics SDK ships in the
framework; roadmap item #13 (v0.15.0) lands one behind this gate.
Off by default — the user has to opt in.
- **Essential + analytics + other** — adds third-party embeds or
social widgets a deployment may configure. The framework ships no
such cookies by default; this category exists so deployments that
add them have a categorized opt-in to wire them behind.
Storage shape:
- **Anonymous viewer** — choice persists in `localStorage` only
(`rfc-app.cookie-consent.v1`). The same browser carries the choice
forward; a different browser, or cleared storage, re-prompts.
- **Authenticated viewer** — choice persists in the `cookie_consent`
row keyed by `user_id`. On sign-in, the server row (if present)
overrides the local snapshot; if the server has no row, the local
choice is uploaded.
The `essential` flag is permanently true at the API surface. The
endpoint accepts it for symmetry but never persists a false value.
A deployment that wants strictly-necessary cookies to be optional
must change the framework contract, not flip a flag.
The framework exports a small JavaScript helper (`frontend/src/lib/
consent.js`) for downstream surfaces:
- `getConsent()` — current snapshot.
- `hasChosen()` — true once the user has made a choice.
- `onConsentChange(cb)` — subscribe to updates.
- `setConsent({analytics, other})` — record a new choice locally
(the banner / settings surface handles server persistence on top).
Roadmap item #13's analytics SDK (v0.15.0) will read from this helper:
read consent, then conditionally `import()` the SDK module. The gate
is wired before the SDK lands so the contract is already in place.
### 14.6 Privacy and cookies policy pages
The framework ships two policy routes:
- `/privacy` — a minimal default privacy policy that describes the
framework's stance (what is stored, why, how to revoke consent,
how to reach the deployment operator). The page is reachable by
anonymous and authenticated viewers alike.
- `/cookies` — the framework's cookies policy, listing exactly which
cookies the framework sets, by category. Self-documenting: a future
framework release that adds or removes a cookie updates this page
as part of the change.
Each page links to the other and to the §14.5 banner. The consent
banner links to both.
Deployments override the policy content via two optional build-time
env vars documented in `frontend/.env.example`:
- `VITE_PRIVACY_POLICY_URL` — an http(s) URL the `/privacy` page
links to as the "full deployment policy". The framework's stub
always renders above the link so the framework-level contract is
always visible; the link layers deployment-specific content on
top.
- `VITE_COOKIES_POLICY_URL` — same shape for `/cookies`.
Both are optional. Unset is the supported default; the stub pages are
sufficient for a default-config deployment that has nothing
deployment-specific to add. The framework chose the env-var path over
a content-repo file because it composes with the existing build-time
config layer; the content-repo-file alternative is the §19.2
candidate.
---
## 15. Notifications
@@ -2552,6 +2688,38 @@ The follow-up session will refine this. A minimal starting set:
failure modes collapse to a single generic message so a probing
client cannot distinguish "you got the wrong code" from "we don't
know this email" — the operator logs carry the distinction.
- `GET /auth/passcode/check` — unauthenticated. Query param `email`.
Returns `{has_passcode: boolean}`. The frontend's `/login` surface
calls this after the email step to decide whether to render a
passcode input or fall back to OTC. The response carries only the
boolean; lockout state, the bcrypt hash, and the `passcode_set_at`
stamp are not leaked. An unknown email and a known-without-passcode
email both return `false`, so the endpoint is enumeration-safe.
- `POST /auth/passcode/set` — authenticated (any role). Body carries
`passcode` (420 characters). bcrypt-hashes the passcode, writes
`users.passcode_hash` + `users.passcode_set_at`, clears the failure
counter and any active lockout. Refuses obvious patterns (a small
denylist: `0000`, `1234`, `aaaa`, `password`, etc.) and length
violations with HTTP 422. Replaces any prior passcode. v0.10.0.
- `DELETE /auth/passcode` — authenticated. Clears
`users.passcode_hash` and `users.passcode_set_at`, returning the
user to OTC-only on next sign-in. v0.10.0.
- `POST /auth/passcode/verify` — unauthenticated. Body carries
`email` and `passcode`. Locates the user, checks the lockout
window, and compares via bcrypt. On success: clears the failure
counter, refreshes `last_seen_at`, stores the session cookie,
returns HTTP 200 with the minimal user payload. On failure:
increments `passcode_failed_attempts`. After five consecutive
failures, stamps `passcode_locked_until = now + 15 minutes` and
returns HTTP 423 with a `locked_until` field; subsequent attempts
inside the window are refused with the same shape. After the
window expires, the next attempt clears the counter and proceeds
normally. The OTC path (§17 above) is unaffected by the passcode
lockout — a locked-out user can still request and verify a fresh
OTC. The wrong-passcode and unknown-email failure modes both
return HTTP 400 with a generic message; the no-passcode-set
failure also collapses to 400 so the response does not enumerate
account state. v0.10.0.
- `GET /api/rfcs` — list entries with state, id, title, slug, repo,
owners, last_active_at, has_open_prs, starred-by-me. Supports
search, sort, filter chips, and the `unclaimed` predicate.
@@ -2785,6 +2953,16 @@ The follow-up session will refine this. A minimal starting set:
short confirmation page.
- `POST /api/webhooks/email-bounce` — bounce and complaint receiver
per §15.4; sets the recipient's global email opt-out.
- `GET /api/users/me/cookie-consent` — read the signed-in user's
cookie consent record per §14.5. Returns `{essential, analytics,
other, recorded_at}`. `recorded_at: null` means "no choice yet"
and the banner should be shown; the framework treats absence of a
row as equivalent to that. `essential` is permanently true.
- `PUT /api/users/me/cookie-consent` — write the signed-in user's
cookie consent record per §14.5. Body: `{essential, analytics,
other}`. The `essential` flag is accepted for symmetry but always
persisted as true. Upserts (a single row per user) and stamps
`recorded_at` to now.
Plus all the chat / streaming / model-picker endpoints, scoped to
per-RFC and per-branch threads.
@@ -3521,19 +3699,18 @@ quiet-hours, per-user mute, unsubscribe, bounce webhook).
migration.* When a fresh email lands at `/auth/otc/verify` with
no matching `users.email` row, v0.7.0 provisions the row with
`display_name = <local part of email>` and no other identity
fields. A subsequent release (the roadmap item-#6 candidate)
is expected to add a one-shot profile-capture step on the
first-OTC sign-in: first name, last name, and a free-text
"why I want access" field that flows into the open beta-access
request queue (also item #6) that replaces the v0.3.0
`allowed_emails` gate. The schema slot exists implicitly already
(`users.display_name` is updateable, the audit-log + permission-
events tables carry the freeform notes); the structural decision
is what gates the capture (modal on `/login` after verify? a
one-time redirect to `/welcome/profile`? a deferred banner on
the main view?) and how it interacts with the open-access
request flow that replaces the allowlist. Earns its session as
the v0.8.0 design pass.
fields. The roadmap item-#6 candidate (v0.8.0) is expected to
add a one-shot profile-capture step on the first-OTC sign-in:
first name, last name, and a free-text "why I want access" field
that flows into the open beta-access request queue (also item #6)
that replaces the v0.3.0 `allowed_emails` gate. The schema slot
exists implicitly already (`users.display_name` is updateable,
the audit-log + permission-events tables carry the freeform
notes); the structural decision is what gates the capture (modal
on `/login` after verify? a one-time redirect to `/welcome/profile`?
a deferred banner on the main view?) and how it interacts with
the open-access request flow that replaces the allowlist. Earns
its session as the v0.8.0 design pass.
- **Removing the Gitea OAuth fallback.** *Surfaced by v0.7.0.*
v0.7.0 keeps `/auth/callback` functional and links to it as a
"Sign in with Gitea (fallback)" affordance on the new `/login`
@@ -3550,16 +3727,17 @@ quiet-hours, per-user mute, unsubscribe, bounce webhook).
its session once the OTC adoption curve flattens.
- **Device trust (30-day skip).** *Surfaced by v0.7.0 — the
signed-in cookie already lasts 30 days via SessionMiddleware,
but every sign-in still requires a fresh OTC.* The roadmap
item-#9 candidate adds a "trust this device" affordance on the
verify step that issues a longer-lived rotating token, so
returning visitors on the same device skip the OTC step. The
shape question is whether the trust is a signed cookie distinct
from the session, a row in a `device_trust` table keyed by a
random device-id, or a property of the session itself; and
whether the trust survives password-equivalent events (none
exist yet — passcodes are item #8 / v0.10.0) or only survives
explicit logout. Earns its session as the v0.11.0 design pass.
but every sign-in still requires a fresh OTC or passcode.* The
roadmap item-#9 candidate adds a "trust this device" affordance
on the verify step that issues a longer-lived rotating token,
so returning visitors on the same device skip both the OTC and
the passcode step. The shape question is whether the trust is a
signed cookie distinct from the session, a row in a `device_trust`
table keyed by a random device-id, or a property of the session
itself; and whether the trust survives password-equivalent events
— v0.10.0's passcode-change and passcode-clear gestures are the
v1 instances — or only survives explicit logout. Earns its
session as the v0.11.0 design pass.
- **Cloudflare Turnstile (or equivalent) on `/auth/otc/request`.**
*Surfaced by v0.7.0 — the endpoint is now the new abuse hot
path.* Per-email cooldown stops the trivial loop; what it
@@ -3579,6 +3757,80 @@ quiet-hours, per-user mute, unsubscribe, bounce webhook).
harness mocks the challenge. Earns its session as the v0.12.0
design pass.
Candidates surfaced during v0.10.0 (user-set passcodes, §6.2 /
roadmap item #8):
- **Passcode policy tunables via env.** v0.10.0 hard-codes the
lockout shape (5 consecutive failures → 15-minute lockout) and
the min/max passcode length (4 / 20) in
`backend/app/passcode.py`. The denylist of obvious patterns is
also hard-coded. A deployment that wants tighter or looser rules
has to fork the constants. Two env vars
(`PASSCODE_LOCKOUT_AFTER_ATTEMPTS`,
`PASSCODE_LOCKOUT_DURATION_MINUTES`) would let operators
reshape the lockout without forking; a third
(`PASSCODE_MIN_LENGTH`) would cover the length floor. Earns its
session if a deployment surfaces evidence that the v1 defaults
bite.
- **Per-IP rate-limiting on `/auth/passcode/verify`.** v0.10.0's
lockout is per-account: 5 failures against the same email lock
that account for 15 minutes. A distributed attacker that knows
many emails can fan out across them without ever tripping any
one account's lockout. Adding a per-IP throttle (e.g., 30
passcode-verify attempts / minute / IP, returning HTTP 429) is
the natural pairing. Defer-able — the per-account lockout is
the v1 shape that closes the loud-loop case; the per-IP
distributed case waits on evidence. Touches §6.2 and §17.
- **Passcode-change "still know your old passcode" challenge.**
v0.10.0 lets a signed-in user replace their passcode from
`/settings/notifications` without re-entering the old one — the
session is sufficient. A future hardening pass may require the
old passcode (or a fresh OTC verify) before accepting the
change, to mitigate session-hijack scenarios where the attacker
rotates the passcode to lock the legitimate owner out. The same
question applies to the clear gesture. Earns its session if
session-hijack becomes a real threat surface.
- **Passkey / WebAuthn.** A much heavier next step than passcodes:
hardware-backed device credentials that resist phishing. The
v0.10.0 passcode shape is a stopgap for the "I'd rather not
type a code every time" ergonomic problem; passkeys are the
long-term answer. Out of scope for the current roadmap —
earns a dedicated session if/when the deployment grows enough
that the phishing surface justifies the integration cost.
Candidates surfaced during v0.13.0 (cookie / privacy consent, §14.5
and §14.6):
- **Policy content via content-repo file vs env var.** v0.13.0
shipped the deployment-policy-override path as two env vars
(`VITE_PRIVACY_POLICY_URL`, `VITE_COOKIES_POLICY_URL`) that the
framework's stub pages link out to. The alternative — accepting
a markdown file path the framework renders inline, parallel to
`PHILOSOPHY_PATH` per §14.2 — was deferred. The two compose:
a deployment could carry both an inline file (rendered above
the fold) and an external link (rendered below). Earns its own
topic when a real deployment ships a policy long enough that
the link-out shape bites and renders the link unread.
- **Global Privacy Control / Do-Not-Track headers.** v0.13.0
scoped the consent surface to the in-app banner and did not
honor browser-side GPC or DNT signals. The framework's stance
is that the in-app banner is the authoritative gesture — a
user who clears their consent in the banner has expressed
intent, and the GPC header is a coarser signal layered on top.
Earns its own topic if a regulatory regime emerges that treats
GPC as the legally-binding gesture, in which case the framework
would honor GPC as an automatic "essential only" choice unless
the user explicitly broadened it in-app.
- **Multi-language consent text.** The banner ships English-only.
i18n of the framework's user-facing strings is a broader topic
than the consent banner; carrying the work in that future topic
rather than as a per-surface translation pass.
- **Analytics SDK gating against `consent.js`.** Roadmap item #13
(target v0.15.0) lands the analytics SDK behind
`lib/consent.js`'s `getConsent().analytics` gate. The framework
contract is already in place; the SDK integration is the work
the item ships. Listed here so the dependency is documented.
### 19.3 Working agreement for the queue
Pre-build sessions ran on the queue agreement from prior versions
+1 -1
View File
@@ -1 +1 @@
0.7.0
0.10.0
+13
View File
@@ -120,6 +120,17 @@ def make_router(
user = auth.current_user(request)
if user is None:
return {"authenticated": False, "user": None}
# v0.10.0: surface a single `has_passcode` flag so the §6.2
# settings tab can render "Set passcode" vs. "Change/Remove
# passcode" without a second round trip. The set-at timestamp
# rides along for the same reason. The hash itself is never
# exposed.
row = db.conn().execute(
"SELECT passcode_hash, passcode_set_at FROM users WHERE id = ?",
(user.user_id,),
).fetchone()
has_passcode = bool(row and row["passcode_hash"])
passcode_set_at = row["passcode_set_at"] if (row and has_passcode) else None
return {
"authenticated": True,
"user": {
@@ -129,6 +140,8 @@ def make_router(
"email": user.email,
"avatar_url": user.avatar_url,
"role": user.role,
"has_passcode": has_passcode,
"passcode_set_at": passcode_set_at,
},
}
+79
View File
@@ -14,6 +14,8 @@ The endpoints in this module are:
- `POST /api/users/me/quiet-hours` set / clear
- `POST /api/users/<id>/notification-mute` §15.8
- `DELETE /api/users/<id>/notification-mute` §15.8
- `GET /api/users/me/cookie-consent` §14.5
- `PUT /api/users/me/cookie-consent` §14.5
- `GET /api/email/unsubscribe` §15.4 one-click
- `POST /api/webhooks/email-bounce` §15.4 receiver
@@ -73,6 +75,15 @@ class BounceBody(BaseModel):
kind: str = Field(default="hard") # 'hard' or 'complaint'
class CookieConsentBody(BaseModel):
# `essential` is always true at the surface; we accept it for symmetry
# but never persist a false value (the framework's strictly-necessary
# cookies are not user-optional per SPEC §14.5).
essential: bool = True
analytics: bool = False
other: bool = False
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Router
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -362,6 +373,74 @@ def make_router(config: Config) -> APIRouter:
)
return {"ok": True}
# ----- Cookie consent (v0.13.0 / roadmap item #11; SPEC §14.5) -----
#
# The shape is intentionally small: three flags + a recorded-at stamp.
# The banner's local-vs-server precedence rule lives in the frontend
# (`consent.js`): on sign-in, the server row (if any) overrides local;
# otherwise local is uploaded.
@router.get("/api/users/me/cookie-consent")
async def get_cookie_consent(request: Request) -> dict[str, Any]:
viewer = auth.require_user(request)
row = db.conn().execute(
"""
SELECT essential, analytics, other_cookies, recorded_at
FROM cookie_consent WHERE user_id = ?
""",
(viewer.user_id,),
).fetchone()
if row is None:
return {
"essential": True,
"analytics": False,
"other": False,
"recorded_at": None,
}
return {
"essential": bool(row["essential"]),
"analytics": bool(row["analytics"]),
"other": bool(row["other_cookies"]),
"recorded_at": row["recorded_at"],
}
@router.put("/api/users/me/cookie-consent")
async def set_cookie_consent(body: CookieConsentBody, request: Request) -> dict[str, Any]:
viewer = auth.require_user(request)
# `essential` is the framework's strictly-necessary set; the
# surface accepts the flag for symmetry but never persists a
# false value. SPEC §14.5: a deployment that wants to make
# session-cookie storage optional must change the framework
# contract, not flip a flag here.
db.conn().execute(
"""
INSERT INTO cookie_consent
(user_id, essential, analytics, other_cookies, recorded_at)
VALUES (?, 1, ?, ?, datetime('now'))
ON CONFLICT(user_id) DO UPDATE SET
essential = 1,
analytics = excluded.analytics,
other_cookies = excluded.other_cookies,
recorded_at = excluded.recorded_at
""",
(
viewer.user_id,
1 if body.analytics else 0,
1 if body.other else 0,
),
)
row = db.conn().execute(
"SELECT recorded_at FROM cookie_consent WHERE user_id = ?",
(viewer.user_id,),
).fetchone()
return {
"ok": True,
"essential": True,
"analytics": bool(body.analytics),
"other": bool(body.other),
"recorded_at": row["recorded_at"] if row else None,
}
# ----- Email: one-click unsubscribe + bounce webhook -----
@router.get("/api/email/unsubscribe")
+78
View File
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ from . import (
email_otc,
hygiene,
otc,
passcode as passcode_mod,
providers as providers_mod,
webhooks,
)
@@ -44,6 +45,15 @@ class OtcVerifyBody(BaseModel):
code: str = Field(min_length=1, max_length=16)
class PasscodeSetBody(BaseModel):
passcode: str = Field(min_length=1, max_length=64)
class PasscodeVerifyBody(BaseModel):
email: str = Field(min_length=3, max_length=320)
passcode: str = Field(min_length=1, max_length=64)
@asynccontextmanager
async def lifespan(app: FastAPI):
config = load_config()
@@ -182,4 +192,72 @@ def _oauth_router(config) -> APIRouter:
},
}
# ---------------------------------------------------------------
# v0.10.0: user-set passcodes after OTC (§6.2, roadmap item #8).
#
# After a successful OTC sign-in, a contributor may set a passcode
# and use email + passcode for subsequent sign-ins. OTC remains the
# forgot-passcode fallback — a verify failure beyond 5 consecutive
# attempts locks the passcode path for 15 minutes; the OTC path is
# unaffected by the lockout.
# ---------------------------------------------------------------
@router.get("/auth/passcode/check")
async def passcode_check(email: str = ""):
"""Does this email have a passcode set? Anonymous endpoint —
the Login.jsx flow calls this after the user types their email
to decide whether to render a passcode input or fall back to
OTC. We surface only the boolean; lockout state, the hash, and
the set-at stamp are not leaked here."""
status = passcode_mod.passcode_status(email)
return {"has_passcode": status.has_passcode}
@router.post("/auth/passcode/set")
async def passcode_set(body: PasscodeSetBody, request: Request):
"""Set or replace the signed-in user's passcode. Requires an
active session (OTC- or passcode-authenticated)."""
user = auth.require_user(request)
try:
passcode_mod.set_passcode(user.user_id, body.passcode)
except passcode_mod.PasscodeValidationError as e:
raise HTTPException(422, str(e))
return {"ok": True}
@router.delete("/auth/passcode")
async def passcode_delete(request: Request):
"""Remove the signed-in user's passcode. The user is back to
OTC-only on next sign-in."""
user = auth.require_user(request)
passcode_mod.clear_passcode(user.user_id)
return {"ok": True}
@router.post("/auth/passcode/verify")
async def passcode_verify(body: PasscodeVerifyBody, request: Request):
"""Sign in with email + passcode. Returns the standard session
payload on success; HTTP 423 with `locked_until` when the
account is in the lockout window; HTTP 400 for every other
failure (the wrong-vs-unknown distinction is intentionally
collapsed so a probing client cannot enumerate emails)."""
result = passcode_mod.verify_passcode(body.email, body.passcode)
if result.reason == "locked":
raise HTTPException(
423,
{
"detail": "Too many failed attempts; sign in with a one-time code instead",
"locked_until": result.locked_until,
},
)
if not result.ok or result.user is None:
raise HTTPException(400, "Invalid passcode")
auth.store_session(request, result.user)
return {
"ok": True,
"user": {
"id": result.user.user_id,
"display_name": result.user.display_name,
"email": result.user.email,
"role": result.user.role,
},
}
return router
+367
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,367 @@
"""§6.2 / v0.10.0: user-set passcodes after OTC (roadmap item #8).
After a successful OTC sign-in, a contributor may set a passcode and
use email + passcode for subsequent sign-ins. OTC remains the fallback
a forgotten passcode is recovered by requesting a fresh OTC.
This module is the state machine behind the four `/auth/passcode/*`
endpoints (`set`, `clear`, `verify`, `check`). The endpoints in
`main.py` thin-wrap these helpers in the same shape the OTC module
uses (see `otc.py`).
Shape:
* `set_passcode(user_id, passcode)` bcrypt-hash the passcode and
write it to `users.passcode_hash` + `users.passcode_set_at`.
Validation (length, denylist) happens here, not at the endpoint,
so the rule lives in one place. Replaces any prior passcode.
* `clear_passcode(user_id)` null out `passcode_hash` and
`passcode_set_at`. The user is back to OTC-only.
* `verify_passcode(email, passcode)` locate the user by email,
check lockout, compare via bcrypt, manage the failure counter,
and return a populated `SessionUser` on success.
* `passcode_status(email)` does this email have a passcode set?
Used by the `/auth/passcode/check` endpoint that the Login.jsx
flow consults after the user types their email.
Lockout is a v1 shape: 5 consecutive failures sets
`passcode_locked_until` to `now + 15 minutes`, after which a verify
attempt that lands inside the window returns HTTP 423. The OTC path
is unaffected by the lockout a user can request and verify a fresh
OTC to sign in while their passcode is locked out, and `verify_code`
in `otc.py` does not consult these columns.
The lockout window and the failure threshold are hard-coded here.
Tuning them via env vars (or moving to per-IP rate-limiting) is a
§19.2 candidate; see SPEC §19.2.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import logging
from dataclasses import dataclass
import bcrypt
from . import db
from .auth import SessionUser
log = logging.getLogger(__name__)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Tunables — intentionally hard-coded in v0.10.0 (see module docstring).
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
LOCKOUT_AFTER_FAILED_ATTEMPTS = 5
LOCKOUT_DURATION_MINUTES = 15
PASSCODE_MIN_LENGTH = 4
PASSCODE_MAX_LENGTH = 20
# A small denylist of patterns we never want a passcode to be. The
# rule is "no obvious patterns"; the list is deliberately small —
# every entry here is a verbatim string match. A heavier check
# (sequential digits, single-character runs of length >= N, etc.)
# is a §19.2 candidate.
PASSCODE_DENYLIST: frozenset[str] = frozenset(
{
"0000",
"1111",
"2222",
"3333",
"4444",
"5555",
"6666",
"7777",
"8888",
"9999",
"1234",
"12345",
"123456",
"1234567",
"12345678",
"123456789",
"1234567890",
"0123",
"01234",
"012345",
"0123456",
"01234567",
"012345678",
"0123456789",
"abcd",
"abcde",
"abcdef",
"qwer",
"qwerty",
"asdf",
"asdfg",
"asdfgh",
"aaaa",
"bbbb",
"cccc",
"password",
"letmein",
}
)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Validation
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
class PasscodeValidationError(Exception):
"""The proposed passcode failed validation. The endpoint surface
maps this to HTTP 422 with the message intact."""
def _validate(passcode: str) -> str:
"""Return the normalized passcode (stripped) or raise.
Rules:
* 4-20 characters after stripping leading/trailing whitespace.
* Not on the small denylist of obvious patterns.
No character-class restriction beyond that the spec says
"numeric PIN or short alphanumeric"; we don't refuse other
characters because the entropy isn't load-bearing (the per-account
lockout is what carries the security weight, mirroring the OTC
shape from v0.7.0).
"""
pc = (passcode or "").strip()
if not pc:
raise PasscodeValidationError("Passcode is required")
if len(pc) < PASSCODE_MIN_LENGTH:
raise PasscodeValidationError(
f"Passcode must be at least {PASSCODE_MIN_LENGTH} characters"
)
if len(pc) > PASSCODE_MAX_LENGTH:
raise PasscodeValidationError(
f"Passcode must be at most {PASSCODE_MAX_LENGTH} characters"
)
if pc.lower() in PASSCODE_DENYLIST:
raise PasscodeValidationError("Passcode is too common; pick something less obvious")
return pc
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Hashing
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def _hash(passcode: str) -> str:
return bcrypt.hashpw(passcode.encode("utf-8"), bcrypt.gensalt()).decode("ascii")
def _check(passcode: str, passcode_hash: str) -> bool:
try:
return bcrypt.checkpw(passcode.encode("utf-8"), passcode_hash.encode("ascii"))
except (ValueError, TypeError):
return False
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Set / clear
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def set_passcode(user_id: int, passcode: str) -> None:
"""Hash and store the passcode. Replaces any prior passcode on the
same row; clears the failure counter and lockout (a user setting a
fresh passcode is implicitly re-authenticating their account)."""
pc = _validate(passcode)
h = _hash(pc)
db.conn().execute(
"""
UPDATE users
SET passcode_hash = ?,
passcode_set_at = datetime('now'),
passcode_failed_attempts = 0,
passcode_locked_until = NULL
WHERE id = ?
""",
(h, user_id),
)
def clear_passcode(user_id: int) -> None:
"""Remove the passcode. The user is back to OTC-only on next sign-in."""
db.conn().execute(
"""
UPDATE users
SET passcode_hash = NULL,
passcode_set_at = NULL,
passcode_failed_attempts = 0,
passcode_locked_until = NULL
WHERE id = ?
""",
(user_id,),
)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Check (status surface for the Login.jsx flow)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
@dataclass
class PasscodeStatus:
"""The shape `/auth/passcode/check` returns.
`has_passcode` is the only signal the frontend needs to decide
whether to show a passcode input or an OTC request step. We do
not leak the hash, the set-at timestamp, or the lockout state
a probing client that wants to know "is this account locked
out" can attempt a verify and read the 423.
"""
has_passcode: bool
def passcode_status(email: str) -> PasscodeStatus:
email = (email or "").strip()
if not email or "@" not in email:
return PasscodeStatus(has_passcode=False)
row = db.conn().execute(
"SELECT passcode_hash FROM users WHERE email = ? COLLATE NOCASE",
(email,),
).fetchone()
if row is None:
return PasscodeStatus(has_passcode=False)
return PasscodeStatus(has_passcode=bool(row["passcode_hash"]))
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Verify
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
@dataclass
class VerifyOutcome:
"""Result of a `verify_passcode` call.
`reason` distinguishes the failure modes the endpoint surfaces as
distinct HTTP shapes:
* 'ok' populated `user`, HTTP 200.
* 'unknown' no user with this email, HTTP 400 (generic).
* 'no_passcode' user exists but never set a passcode, HTTP 400
(the frontend should fall back to OTC).
* 'locked' user is currently in the lockout window, HTTP
423. `locked_until` carries the ISO-8601 stamp for the client.
* 'wrong' passcode didn't match. HTTP 400. If the failure
crossed the lockout threshold the row is now locked; the
endpoint surfaces this as a fresh `locked` response on the
next attempt rather than collapsing the two states here.
"""
ok: bool
user: SessionUser | None
reason: str
locked_until: str | None = None
def verify_passcode(email: str, passcode: str) -> VerifyOutcome:
email = (email or "").strip()
passcode = (passcode or "").strip()
if not email or not passcode:
return VerifyOutcome(ok=False, user=None, reason="unknown")
row = db.conn().execute(
"""
SELECT id, gitea_id, gitea_login, email, display_name, avatar_url, role,
passcode_hash, passcode_failed_attempts, passcode_locked_until
FROM users
WHERE email = ? COLLATE NOCASE
""",
(email,),
).fetchone()
if row is None:
return VerifyOutcome(ok=False, user=None, reason="unknown")
if not row["passcode_hash"]:
return VerifyOutcome(ok=False, user=None, reason="no_passcode")
# Lockout check: if `passcode_locked_until` is populated and in the
# future, the verify is refused without touching the hash. Once the
# window has elapsed we let the verify proceed; the failed-attempts
# counter is also reset so the user gets a fresh 5-attempt budget.
locked_until = row["passcode_locked_until"]
if locked_until:
still_locked = db.conn().execute(
"SELECT datetime(?) > datetime('now') AS still_locked",
(locked_until,),
).fetchone()["still_locked"]
if still_locked:
return VerifyOutcome(
ok=False,
user=None,
reason="locked",
locked_until=locked_until,
)
# Lockout expired — clear the counter so the next failure starts
# from zero, and continue with the verify.
db.conn().execute(
"""
UPDATE users
SET passcode_failed_attempts = 0,
passcode_locked_until = NULL
WHERE id = ?
""",
(row["id"],),
)
if _check(passcode, row["passcode_hash"]):
# Success: clear the counter (a single success wipes the
# accumulated failures — the threshold tracks *consecutive*
# failures).
db.conn().execute(
"""
UPDATE users
SET passcode_failed_attempts = 0,
passcode_locked_until = NULL,
last_seen_at = datetime('now')
WHERE id = ?
""",
(row["id"],),
)
return VerifyOutcome(
ok=True,
user=SessionUser(
user_id=row["id"],
gitea_id=row["gitea_id"] or 0,
gitea_login=row["gitea_login"] or "",
display_name=row["display_name"],
email=row["email"] or email,
avatar_url=row["avatar_url"] or "",
role=row["role"],
),
reason="ok",
)
# Failure: increment the counter. If this push crosses the
# threshold, stamp the lockout. The next verify attempt against
# the same row returns 423 with the `locked_until` stamp.
next_count = (row["passcode_failed_attempts"] or 0) + 1
if next_count >= LOCKOUT_AFTER_FAILED_ATTEMPTS:
db.conn().execute(
f"""
UPDATE users
SET passcode_failed_attempts = ?,
passcode_locked_until = datetime('now', '+{LOCKOUT_DURATION_MINUTES} minutes')
WHERE id = ?
""",
(next_count, row["id"]),
)
new_locked_until = db.conn().execute(
"SELECT passcode_locked_until FROM users WHERE id = ?",
(row["id"],),
).fetchone()["passcode_locked_until"]
return VerifyOutcome(
ok=False,
user=None,
reason="locked",
locked_until=new_locked_until,
)
db.conn().execute(
"UPDATE users SET passcode_failed_attempts = ? WHERE id = ?",
(next_count, row["id"]),
)
return VerifyOutcome(ok=False, user=None, reason="wrong")
+35
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
-- v0.13.0 / roadmap item #11 — cookie consent.
--
-- The framework now ships a non-modal cookie consent banner per the
-- privacy-and-cookies UX (SPEC §14.5 / §14.6). Authenticated viewers
-- get their choice persisted server-side so it survives sign-out /
-- sign-in across devices; anonymous viewers persist their choice in
-- localStorage only.
--
-- Shape: a single row per user, three flags, plus a recorded-at stamp.
-- The flags are:
-- - essential: the framework's strictly-necessary cookies (session,
-- itsdangerous-signed payloads, CSRF if any). Permanently
-- true at the API surface — included in the row for
-- symmetry with the analytics / other flags rather than
-- because the user can switch it off.
-- - analytics: reserved for the §13 analytics SDK gating that lands
-- in v0.15.0. Off by default; opt-in via the banner.
-- - other: everything else (third-party embeds, social widgets).
-- Off by default; opt-in via the banner.
--
-- A NULL recorded_at means "no choice yet" — the banner should re-prompt
-- the next time the user signs in on a fresh device. Once recorded_at is
-- set, the banner is hidden until the user re-opens it from the
-- /settings/notifications "Privacy & cookies" tab.
--
-- The row is created lazily on first PUT. Absence of a row is equivalent
-- to NULL recorded_at — the banner shows.
CREATE TABLE cookie_consent (
user_id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY REFERENCES users(id) ON DELETE CASCADE,
essential INTEGER NOT NULL DEFAULT 1 CHECK (essential IN (0, 1)),
analytics INTEGER NOT NULL DEFAULT 0 CHECK (analytics IN (0, 1)),
other_cookies INTEGER NOT NULL DEFAULT 0 CHECK (other_cookies IN (0, 1)),
recorded_at TEXT
);
+52
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
-- §6.2 / v0.10.0: user-set passcodes after OTC (roadmap item #8).
--
-- After a successful OTC sign-in, a contributor may set a passcode
-- (numeric PIN or short alphanumeric). Subsequent sign-ins on the same
-- account can use email + passcode instead of email + OTC. OTC remains
-- the structural fallback — a forgotten passcode is recovered by
-- requesting a fresh OTC and signing in via that path. Per-account
-- lockout after 5 consecutive verify failures redirects the user to
-- the OTC path for 15 minutes; the OTC path itself is unaffected by
-- the passcode lockout (a locked-out user can still receive a fresh
-- code and sign in).
--
-- The columns are additive to the `users` table from `012_otc.sql`.
-- v0.8.0's `permission_state` column (roadmap item #6) lands in the
-- driver's integration order ahead of this migration; we do not touch
-- that column here. v0.7.0's nullable-`gitea_id`/`gitea_login` shape
-- is preserved verbatim.
--
-- Storage shape:
--
-- * `passcode_hash` (nullable) — bcrypt hash of the passcode.
-- NULL means "no passcode set"; the user is OTC-only.
-- * `passcode_set_at` (nullable) — timestamp of the most recent
-- `passcode/set` call. Updated when a passcode is set or
-- replaced; cleared when the passcode is removed.
-- * `passcode_failed_attempts` — count of consecutive failed
-- verify attempts since the last successful verify (or since
-- the lockout cleared). Resets to 0 on success and on lockout
-- expiry. Defaults to 0 so existing rows post-migration are
-- not implicitly half-locked.
-- * `passcode_locked_until` (nullable) — if populated and the
-- timestamp is in the future, passcode verify is refused with
-- HTTP 423. Cleared on successful verify after the window
-- expires, or by the operator via direct DB intervention if
-- ever needed (no admin endpoint surfaces this in v1).
--
-- v0.10.0 introduces no new env vars. The lockout window (5 attempts,
-- 15 minutes) is hard-coded in `backend/app/passcode.py`; raising or
-- lowering it is a future-§19.2 candidate. Passcode hashing reuses
-- the bcrypt dependency added in v0.7.0 for OTC; no new secret is
-- required (the existing `SECRET_KEY` continues to sign sessions).
--
-- Note on SQLite: ALTER TABLE ... ADD COLUMN is supported, so this
-- migration does not need the rebuild dance that `012_otc.sql`
-- required. The runner wraps each file in a single BEGIN/COMMIT
-- block — see `backend/app/db.py` — so either every ADD COLUMN
-- here lands or none do.
ALTER TABLE users ADD COLUMN passcode_hash TEXT;
ALTER TABLE users ADD COLUMN passcode_set_at TEXT;
ALTER TABLE users ADD COLUMN passcode_failed_attempts INTEGER NOT NULL DEFAULT 0;
ALTER TABLE users ADD COLUMN passcode_locked_until TEXT;
@@ -0,0 +1,205 @@
"""End-to-end tests for v0.13.0 / roadmap item #11 — cookie / privacy consent.
Covers the §17 endpoints (`GET` / `PUT /api/users/me/cookie-consent`) and
the §14.5 storage contract:
* GET on a fresh user returns no-choice-yet (recorded_at is None,
essential=True, analytics=False, other=False).
* PUT writes a row, stamps recorded_at, and the choice survives.
* PUT with `analytics=true, other=false` round-trips faithfully.
* `essential` is permanently true at the API surface a PUT that
requests essential=false is still persisted with essential=true.
* The endpoint requires authentication (401 for anon).
* A second PUT updates the existing row in place (single row per
user, recorded_at re-stamps).
* Choice persists across sign-out / sign-in.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import pytest
from test_propose_vertical import ( # noqa: F401
FakeGitea,
app_with_fake_gitea,
provision_user_row,
sign_in_as,
tmp_env,
)
def test_get_cookie_consent_fresh_user_has_no_choice(app_with_fake_gitea):
from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
with TestClient(app) as client:
provision_user_row(user_id=2, login="alice", role="contributor")
sign_in_as(client, user_id=2, gitea_login="alice", display_name="Alice", role="contributor")
r = client.get("/api/users/me/cookie-consent")
assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
body = r.json()
assert body["essential"] is True
assert body["analytics"] is False
assert body["other"] is False
assert body["recorded_at"] is None
def test_put_cookie_consent_records_choice(app_with_fake_gitea):
from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
with TestClient(app) as client:
provision_user_row(user_id=2, login="alice", role="contributor")
sign_in_as(client, user_id=2, gitea_login="alice", display_name="Alice", role="contributor")
r = client.put(
"/api/users/me/cookie-consent",
json={"essential": True, "analytics": True, "other": False},
)
assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
body = r.json()
assert body["ok"] is True
assert body["essential"] is True
assert body["analytics"] is True
assert body["other"] is False
assert body["recorded_at"] is not None
# Round-trip the read endpoint.
r = client.get("/api/users/me/cookie-consent")
body = r.json()
assert body["essential"] is True
assert body["analytics"] is True
assert body["other"] is False
assert body["recorded_at"] is not None
def test_put_cookie_consent_forces_essential_true(app_with_fake_gitea):
"""§14.5: `essential` is permanently true at the API surface. A
request that sets it to false is accepted (for symmetry with the
other two flags) but persisted as true.
"""
from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
from app import db
app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
with TestClient(app) as client:
provision_user_row(user_id=2, login="alice", role="contributor")
sign_in_as(client, user_id=2, gitea_login="alice", display_name="Alice", role="contributor")
r = client.put(
"/api/users/me/cookie-consent",
json={"essential": False, "analytics": False, "other": False},
)
assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
assert r.json()["essential"] is True
# Confirm at the schema layer too — the persisted row has essential=1.
row = db.conn().execute(
"SELECT essential FROM cookie_consent WHERE user_id = ?",
(2,),
).fetchone()
assert row["essential"] == 1
def test_cookie_consent_requires_auth(app_with_fake_gitea):
from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
with TestClient(app) as client:
r = client.get("/api/users/me/cookie-consent")
assert r.status_code == 401, r.text
r = client.put(
"/api/users/me/cookie-consent",
json={"essential": True, "analytics": True, "other": True},
)
assert r.status_code == 401, r.text
def test_put_cookie_consent_upserts_in_place(app_with_fake_gitea):
"""A second PUT updates the existing row rather than inserting a new
one. Verifies the §14.5 single-row-per-user shape.
"""
from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
from app import db
app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
with TestClient(app) as client:
provision_user_row(user_id=2, login="alice", role="contributor")
sign_in_as(client, user_id=2, gitea_login="alice", display_name="Alice", role="contributor")
client.put(
"/api/users/me/cookie-consent",
json={"essential": True, "analytics": True, "other": False},
)
client.put(
"/api/users/me/cookie-consent",
json={"essential": True, "analytics": False, "other": True},
)
rows = db.conn().execute(
"SELECT analytics, other_cookies FROM cookie_consent WHERE user_id = ?",
(2,),
).fetchall()
assert len(rows) == 1
assert rows[0]["analytics"] == 0
assert rows[0]["other_cookies"] == 1
def test_cookie_consent_persists_across_sign_out_in(app_with_fake_gitea):
"""§14.5 precedence: the server row survives sign-out / sign-in.
"""
from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
with TestClient(app) as client:
provision_user_row(user_id=2, login="alice", role="contributor")
sign_in_as(client, user_id=2, gitea_login="alice", display_name="Alice", role="contributor")
client.put(
"/api/users/me/cookie-consent",
json={"essential": True, "analytics": True, "other": True},
)
# Simulate sign-out by clearing the session cookie.
client.cookies.clear()
# Anonymous viewer cannot read.
r = client.get("/api/users/me/cookie-consent")
assert r.status_code == 401
# Sign back in as Alice. The server row is still there.
sign_in_as(client, user_id=2, gitea_login="alice", display_name="Alice", role="contributor")
r = client.get("/api/users/me/cookie-consent")
body = r.json()
assert body["analytics"] is True
assert body["other"] is True
assert body["recorded_at"] is not None
def test_two_users_have_independent_rows(app_with_fake_gitea):
from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
with TestClient(app) as client:
provision_user_row(user_id=2, login="alice", role="contributor")
provision_user_row(user_id=3, login="bob", role="contributor")
sign_in_as(client, user_id=2, gitea_login="alice", display_name="Alice", role="contributor")
client.put(
"/api/users/me/cookie-consent",
json={"essential": True, "analytics": True, "other": False},
)
sign_in_as(client, user_id=3, gitea_login="bob", display_name="Bob", role="contributor")
client.put(
"/api/users/me/cookie-consent",
json={"essential": True, "analytics": False, "other": False},
)
# Each user reads their own row.
r = client.get("/api/users/me/cookie-consent").json()
assert r["analytics"] is False # Bob's
sign_in_as(client, user_id=2, gitea_login="alice", display_name="Alice", role="contributor")
r = client.get("/api/users/me/cookie-consent").json()
assert r["analytics"] is True # Alice's
+532
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,532 @@
"""End-to-end integration tests for the v0.10.0 user-set passcode
vertical (§6.2, roadmap item #8).
After a successful OTC sign-in the user can set a passcode and use
email + passcode for subsequent sign-ins. OTC remains the structural
fallback these tests prove:
* `/auth/passcode/set` requires an active session.
* `/auth/passcode/check` returns `has_passcode` without leaking the
hash, the set-at stamp, or the lockout state.
* Happy path: OTC sign-in set passcode sign out email +
passcode signs in (no OTC roundtrip).
* Wrong passcode increments the failure counter without locking.
* Five consecutive failures lock the passcode path (HTTP 423) and
persist `passcode_locked_until` on the user row.
* The lockout expires after `passcode_locked_until`; a verify
attempt past the window succeeds again and clears the counter.
* The OTC path is unaffected by the passcode lockout a user
whose passcode is locked can still request and verify a fresh
OTC to sign in.
* Clearing the passcode wipes the hash; subsequent verify refuses
with the no-passcode failure shape.
* Setting a new passcode replaces the prior one (and resets the
failure counter / lockout state).
* `passcode_set_at` updates on every set call.
* The validation denylist refuses obvious patterns (e.g. `0000`,
`1234`).
* Passcode length is enforced (4-20).
The fakes from `test_propose_vertical` give us a working app harness.
The OTC envelope buffer from `test_otc_vertical` is reused for the
OTC roundtrips this suite needs.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import pytest
from test_propose_vertical import ( # noqa: F401
FakeGitea,
app_with_fake_gitea,
provision_user_row,
tmp_env,
)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Helpers — mirror the OTC suite's outbound-buffer helpers.
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def _reset_outbound():
from app import email as email_mod
email_mod.reset_sent_envelopes()
def _outbound_otc_codes(to_address: str | None = None) -> list[str]:
from app import email as email_mod
out = []
for env in email_mod.sent_envelopes():
if env.get("kind") != "otc":
continue
if to_address is not None and env["to"] != to_address:
continue
for line in env["body"].splitlines():
tok = line.strip()
if tok.isdigit() and len(tok) == 6:
out.append(tok)
break
return out
def _sign_in_via_otc(client, email: str) -> None:
"""Run an OTC request+verify so the client carries an authenticated
session. The cooldown is irrelevant on a fresh email; we don't
need to drop it."""
r = client.post("/auth/otc/request", json={"email": email})
assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
code = _outbound_otc_codes(email)[-1]
r = client.post("/auth/otc/verify", json={"email": email, "code": code})
assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Set passcode — auth-required, happy path
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def test_set_passcode_requires_session(app_with_fake_gitea):
from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
with TestClient(app) as client:
r = client.post("/auth/passcode/set", json={"passcode": "secret123"})
assert r.status_code == 401
def test_set_passcode_after_otc_landing_persists_hash(app_with_fake_gitea):
from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
from app import db
app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
with TestClient(app) as client:
_reset_outbound()
_sign_in_via_otc(client, "alice@example.com")
r = client.post("/auth/passcode/set", json={"passcode": "secret123"})
assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
row = db.conn().execute(
"SELECT passcode_hash, passcode_set_at FROM users WHERE email = ? COLLATE NOCASE",
("alice@example.com",),
).fetchone()
assert row is not None
assert row["passcode_hash"] is not None
# Not the plaintext.
assert row["passcode_hash"] != "secret123"
assert row["passcode_set_at"] is not None
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Check endpoint — leak-free shape
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def test_check_endpoint_returns_false_for_unknown_email(app_with_fake_gitea):
from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
with TestClient(app) as client:
r = client.get("/auth/passcode/check", params={"email": "nobody@example.com"})
assert r.status_code == 200
assert r.json() == {"has_passcode": False}
def test_check_endpoint_returns_false_for_user_without_passcode(app_with_fake_gitea):
from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
with TestClient(app) as client:
_reset_outbound()
_sign_in_via_otc(client, "bob@example.com")
r = client.get("/auth/passcode/check", params={"email": "bob@example.com"})
assert r.status_code == 200
assert r.json() == {"has_passcode": False}
def test_check_endpoint_returns_true_after_set(app_with_fake_gitea):
from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
with TestClient(app) as client:
_reset_outbound()
_sign_in_via_otc(client, "carol@example.com")
client.post("/auth/passcode/set", json={"passcode": "letmein9"})
# Drop the session so the check is read in the anonymous shape.
client.cookies.clear()
r = client.get("/auth/passcode/check", params={"email": "carol@example.com"})
assert r.status_code == 200
assert r.json() == {"has_passcode": True}
# The response carries ONLY the boolean — no hash, no stamp.
assert set(r.json().keys()) == {"has_passcode"}
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Verify path — happy path
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def test_verify_passcode_signs_in_user(app_with_fake_gitea):
from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
with TestClient(app) as client:
_reset_outbound()
_sign_in_via_otc(client, "dave@example.com")
client.post("/auth/passcode/set", json={"passcode": "secret123"})
client.cookies.clear()
r = client.post(
"/auth/passcode/verify",
json={"email": "dave@example.com", "passcode": "secret123"},
)
assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
me = client.get("/api/auth/me").json()
assert me["authenticated"] is True
assert me["user"]["email"] == "dave@example.com"
assert me["user"]["has_passcode"] is True
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Verify path — failure modes
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def test_verify_passcode_wrong_increments_counter_without_locking(app_with_fake_gitea):
from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
from app import db
app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
with TestClient(app) as client:
_reset_outbound()
_sign_in_via_otc(client, "erin@example.com")
client.post("/auth/passcode/set", json={"passcode": "secret123"})
client.cookies.clear()
# Three bad attempts — under the lockout threshold.
for _ in range(3):
r = client.post(
"/auth/passcode/verify",
json={"email": "erin@example.com", "passcode": "wrongwrong"},
)
assert r.status_code == 400
row = db.conn().execute(
"SELECT passcode_failed_attempts, passcode_locked_until FROM users WHERE email = ?",
("erin@example.com",),
).fetchone()
assert row["passcode_failed_attempts"] == 3
assert row["passcode_locked_until"] is None
def test_verify_passcode_locks_after_five_failures(app_with_fake_gitea):
from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
from app import db
app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
with TestClient(app) as client:
_reset_outbound()
_sign_in_via_otc(client, "frank@example.com")
client.post("/auth/passcode/set", json={"passcode": "secret123"})
client.cookies.clear()
# Five bad attempts — the last crosses the threshold and the
# response shape flips to 423.
statuses = []
for _ in range(5):
r = client.post(
"/auth/passcode/verify",
json={"email": "frank@example.com", "passcode": "wrongwrong"},
)
statuses.append(r.status_code)
# First four are 400, the fifth (threshold-crossing) is 423.
assert statuses == [400, 400, 400, 400, 423]
row = db.conn().execute(
"SELECT passcode_failed_attempts, passcode_locked_until FROM users WHERE email = ?",
("frank@example.com",),
).fetchone()
assert row["passcode_failed_attempts"] >= 5
assert row["passcode_locked_until"] is not None
# Sixth attempt — still locked, still 423, even with the correct
# passcode (lockout overrides the verify).
r = client.post(
"/auth/passcode/verify",
json={"email": "frank@example.com", "passcode": "secret123"},
)
assert r.status_code == 423
def test_verify_passcode_lockout_expires(app_with_fake_gitea):
from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
from app import db
app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
with TestClient(app) as client:
_reset_outbound()
_sign_in_via_otc(client, "gina@example.com")
client.post("/auth/passcode/set", json={"passcode": "secret123"})
client.cookies.clear()
for _ in range(5):
client.post(
"/auth/passcode/verify",
json={"email": "gina@example.com", "passcode": "wrongwrong"},
)
# Backdate the lockout to the past so the next attempt clears it.
db.conn().execute(
"""
UPDATE users
SET passcode_locked_until = datetime('now', '-1 minute')
WHERE email = ?
""",
("gina@example.com",),
)
r = client.post(
"/auth/passcode/verify",
json={"email": "gina@example.com", "passcode": "secret123"},
)
assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
# Lockout cleared, counter reset.
row = db.conn().execute(
"SELECT passcode_failed_attempts, passcode_locked_until FROM users WHERE email = ?",
("gina@example.com",),
).fetchone()
assert row["passcode_failed_attempts"] == 0
assert row["passcode_locked_until"] is None
def test_otc_path_unaffected_by_passcode_lockout(app_with_fake_gitea, monkeypatch):
from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
# Drop the OTC cooldown so the second request lands without a 429.
# The cooldown is re-read from env on every `request_code` call so
# this takes effect mid-process.
monkeypatch.setenv("OTC_REQUEST_COOLDOWN_SECONDS", "0")
app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
with TestClient(app) as client:
_reset_outbound()
_sign_in_via_otc(client, "harvey@example.com")
client.post("/auth/passcode/set", json={"passcode": "secret123"})
client.cookies.clear()
# Lock the passcode path.
for _ in range(5):
client.post(
"/auth/passcode/verify",
json={"email": "harvey@example.com", "passcode": "wrongwrong"},
)
# The OTC path is unaffected by the passcode lockout: the user
# can still request and verify a fresh code to sign in.
r = client.post("/auth/otc/request", json={"email": "harvey@example.com"})
assert r.status_code == 200
code = _outbound_otc_codes("harvey@example.com")[-1]
r = client.post("/auth/otc/verify", json={"email": "harvey@example.com", "code": code})
assert r.status_code == 200
# The user is now signed in via OTC even though the passcode
# path is locked. The /api/auth/me payload reflects this.
me = client.get("/api/auth/me").json()
assert me["authenticated"] is True
assert me["user"]["email"] == "harvey@example.com"
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Clear + replace
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def test_clear_passcode_wipes_the_hash(app_with_fake_gitea):
from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
from app import db
app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
with TestClient(app) as client:
_reset_outbound()
_sign_in_via_otc(client, "ivy@example.com")
client.post("/auth/passcode/set", json={"passcode": "secret123"})
r = client.delete("/auth/passcode")
assert r.status_code == 200
row = db.conn().execute(
"SELECT passcode_hash, passcode_set_at FROM users WHERE email = ?",
("ivy@example.com",),
).fetchone()
assert row["passcode_hash"] is None
assert row["passcode_set_at"] is None
# Verify against the cleared passcode refuses (no-passcode shape
# collapses to a generic 400).
client.cookies.clear()
r = client.post(
"/auth/passcode/verify",
json={"email": "ivy@example.com", "passcode": "secret123"},
)
assert r.status_code == 400
def test_setting_new_passcode_replaces_old(app_with_fake_gitea):
from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
with TestClient(app) as client:
_reset_outbound()
_sign_in_via_otc(client, "jane@example.com")
client.post("/auth/passcode/set", json={"passcode": "secret123"})
# Replace.
r = client.post("/auth/passcode/set", json={"passcode": "newsecret9"})
assert r.status_code == 200
client.cookies.clear()
# Old passcode refuses.
r = client.post(
"/auth/passcode/verify",
json={"email": "jane@example.com", "passcode": "secret123"},
)
assert r.status_code == 400
# New passcode signs in.
r = client.post(
"/auth/passcode/verify",
json={"email": "jane@example.com", "passcode": "newsecret9"},
)
assert r.status_code == 200
def test_setting_new_passcode_resets_lockout(app_with_fake_gitea, monkeypatch):
from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
from app import db
monkeypatch.setenv("OTC_REQUEST_COOLDOWN_SECONDS", "0")
app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
with TestClient(app) as client:
_reset_outbound()
_sign_in_via_otc(client, "kate@example.com")
client.post("/auth/passcode/set", json={"passcode": "secret123"})
# Lock the passcode path with bad attempts (drop session first).
client.cookies.clear()
for _ in range(5):
client.post(
"/auth/passcode/verify",
json={"email": "kate@example.com", "passcode": "wrongwrong"},
)
row = db.conn().execute(
"SELECT passcode_locked_until FROM users WHERE email = ?",
("kate@example.com",),
).fetchone()
assert row["passcode_locked_until"] is not None
# Sign back in via OTC and reset the passcode.
r = client.post("/auth/otc/request", json={"email": "kate@example.com"})
assert r.status_code == 200
code = _outbound_otc_codes("kate@example.com")[-1]
r = client.post("/auth/otc/verify", json={"email": "kate@example.com", "code": code})
assert r.status_code == 200
r = client.post("/auth/passcode/set", json={"passcode": "freshcode9"})
assert r.status_code == 200
# Lockout cleared on set.
row = db.conn().execute(
"SELECT passcode_locked_until, passcode_failed_attempts FROM users WHERE email = ?",
("kate@example.com",),
).fetchone()
assert row["passcode_locked_until"] is None
assert row["passcode_failed_attempts"] == 0
def test_passcode_set_at_updates_on_each_set(app_with_fake_gitea):
from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
from app import db
import time
app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
with TestClient(app) as client:
_reset_outbound()
_sign_in_via_otc(client, "luke@example.com")
client.post("/auth/passcode/set", json={"passcode": "secret123"})
first_stamp = db.conn().execute(
"SELECT passcode_set_at FROM users WHERE email = ?",
("luke@example.com",),
).fetchone()["passcode_set_at"]
assert first_stamp is not None
# SQLite's datetime('now') has second precision; sleep so the
# stamp visibly advances on the next set.
time.sleep(1.1)
client.post("/auth/passcode/set", json={"passcode": "newcode99"})
second_stamp = db.conn().execute(
"SELECT passcode_set_at FROM users WHERE email = ?",
("luke@example.com",),
).fetchone()["passcode_set_at"]
assert second_stamp is not None
assert second_stamp >= first_stamp
# Lexicographic compare on ISO-8601 datetime strings works for
# the SQLite shape.
assert second_stamp > first_stamp
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Validation
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def test_set_passcode_refuses_too_short(app_with_fake_gitea):
from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
with TestClient(app) as client:
_reset_outbound()
_sign_in_via_otc(client, "mia@example.com")
r = client.post("/auth/passcode/set", json={"passcode": "abc"})
assert r.status_code == 422
def test_set_passcode_refuses_denylist_pattern(app_with_fake_gitea):
from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
with TestClient(app) as client:
_reset_outbound()
_sign_in_via_otc(client, "nick@example.com")
for bad in ["0000", "1234", "aaaa", "qwerty", "password"]:
r = client.post("/auth/passcode/set", json={"passcode": bad})
assert r.status_code == 422, f"expected 422 for {bad!r}, got {r.status_code}"
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Auth me payload
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def test_auth_me_carries_has_passcode_flag(app_with_fake_gitea):
from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
with TestClient(app) as client:
_reset_outbound()
_sign_in_via_otc(client, "olga@example.com")
me = client.get("/api/auth/me").json()
assert me["user"]["has_passcode"] is False
assert me["user"]["passcode_set_at"] is None
client.post("/auth/passcode/set", json={"passcode": "secret123"})
me = client.get("/api/auth/me").json()
assert me["user"]["has_passcode"] is True
assert me["user"]["passcode_set_at"] is not None
+25
View File
@@ -24,3 +24,28 @@ VITE_APP_NAME=
# VITE_BETA_CONTACT=ben@wiggleverse.org
# VITE_BETA_CONTACT=DM @ben on Matrix
VITE_BETA_CONTACT=
# Optional URL to the deployment's privacy policy (v0.13.0+, SPEC §14.5).
# The framework ships a minimal default privacy policy at `/privacy`
# that describes the framework's stance and lists the cookies the
# framework sets. When this var is set to an http(s) URL, the page
# renders the framework's stub above a link to the configured URL —
# deployments use this to layer their own policy content on top
# without forking the framework. Unset is OK; the stub is sufficient
# for a deployment that has nothing specific to add.
#
# Examples:
# VITE_PRIVACY_POLICY_URL=https://wiggleverse.org/privacy
VITE_PRIVACY_POLICY_URL=
# Optional URL to the deployment's cookies policy (v0.13.0+, SPEC §14.6).
# Same shape as VITE_PRIVACY_POLICY_URL. The framework's default
# `/cookies` page lists exactly which cookies the framework sets
# (rfc_session, the consent-choice localStorage entry); a deployment
# that adds its own cookies (analytics SDK once #13 lands, third-party
# embeds) points this var at a page that documents the full list.
# Unset is OK; the stub is sufficient for a default-config deployment.
#
# Examples:
# VITE_COOKIES_POLICY_URL=https://wiggleverse.org/cookies
VITE_COOKIES_POLICY_URL=
+2 -2
View File
@@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
{
"name": "rfc-app-frontend",
"version": "0.7.0",
"version": "0.10.0",
"lockfileVersion": 3,
"requires": true,
"packages": {
"": {
"name": "rfc-app-frontend",
"version": "0.7.0",
"version": "0.10.0",
"dependencies": {
"@codemirror/commands": "^6.10.3",
"@codemirror/lang-markdown": "^6.5.0",
+1 -1
View File
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
{
"name": "rfc-app-frontend",
"private": true,
"version": "0.7.0",
"version": "0.10.0",
"type": "module",
"scripts": {
"dev": "vite",
+103
View File
@@ -1947,3 +1947,106 @@
.discussion-readonly {
font-size: 12px; color: #666; padding: 4px 0;
}
/* §14.5 — cookie consent banner (v0.13.0) */
.cookie-consent-banner {
position: fixed;
left: 0; right: 0; bottom: 0;
z-index: 1000;
background: #fff;
border-top: 1px solid #d1d5db;
box-shadow: 0 -8px 24px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.08);
padding: 20px 24px;
}
.cookie-consent-body {
max-width: 880px; margin: 0 auto;
display: flex; flex-direction: column; gap: 12px;
}
.cookie-consent-title {
margin: 0; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 700; color: #111;
}
.cookie-consent-intro {
margin: 0; font-size: 13px; color: #4b5563; line-height: 1.5;
}
.cookie-consent-choices {
border: none; padding: 0; margin: 0;
display: flex; flex-direction: column; gap: 6px;
}
.cookie-consent-choice {
display: flex; gap: 10px; align-items: flex-start;
padding: 10px 12px; border-radius: 6px;
border: 1px solid #e5e7eb;
cursor: pointer;
}
.cookie-consent-choice.is-selected {
border-color: #111; background: #f9fafb;
}
.cookie-consent-choice input[type=radio] { margin-top: 3px; }
.cookie-consent-choice-text {
display: flex; flex-direction: column; gap: 2px;
}
.cookie-consent-choice-label {
font-size: 13px; font-weight: 600; color: #111;
}
.cookie-consent-choice-desc {
font-size: 12px; color: #6b7280; line-height: 1.5;
}
.cookie-consent-links {
margin: 0; font-size: 12px; color: #6b7280;
}
.cookie-consent-links a { color: #111; text-decoration: underline; }
.cookie-consent-error {
margin: 0; font-size: 12px; color: #b91c1c;
}
.cookie-consent-actions {
display: flex; gap: 8px; justify-content: flex-end;
}
.visually-hidden {
position: absolute; width: 1px; height: 1px;
padding: 0; margin: -1px; overflow: hidden;
clip: rect(0, 0, 0, 0); white-space: nowrap; border: 0;
}
/* §14.5 / §14.6 — privacy + cookies policy pages */
.policy-page {
max-width: 720px; margin: 0 auto;
padding: 0 32px 80px;
}
.policy-header {
display: flex; align-items: center; gap: 12px;
padding: 20px 0; border-bottom: 1px solid #f3f4f6;
margin-bottom: 24px;
}
.policy-back {
background: none; border: none; cursor: pointer;
color: #6b7280; font-size: 13px; padding: 4px 8px;
}
.policy-back:hover { color: #111; }
.policy-title { font-size: 13px; font-weight: 600; color: #6b7280; }
.policy-body { line-height: 1.7; color: #111; }
.policy-body h1 { font-size: 26px; margin: 0 0 6px; font-weight: 700; }
.policy-body .policy-subtitle { color: #6b7280; margin: 0 0 24px; font-size: 14px; }
.policy-body h2 { font-size: 16px; margin: 28px 0 8px; font-weight: 600; }
.policy-body p { margin: 0 0 12px; }
.policy-body ul { margin: 0 0 16px; padding-left: 22px; }
.policy-body li { margin-bottom: 6px; }
.policy-body code {
background: #f3f4f6; padding: 1px 5px; border-radius: 3px;
font-family: ui-monospace, monospace; font-size: 12px;
}
.policy-body .policy-footnote {
margin-top: 24px; font-size: 12px; color: #6b7280;
}
.policy-table {
width: 100%; border-collapse: collapse;
font-size: 13px; margin: 8px 0 16px;
}
.policy-table th, .policy-table td {
text-align: left; padding: 8px 10px;
border-bottom: 1px solid #f3f4f6;
vertical-align: top;
}
.policy-table th {
font-size: 11px; text-transform: uppercase;
color: #6b7280; letter-spacing: 0.05em; font-weight: 600;
}
+26
View File
@@ -14,6 +14,9 @@ import Philosophy from './components/Philosophy.jsx'
import NotificationSettings from './components/NotificationSettings.jsx'
import Admin from './components/Admin.jsx'
import ToastHost, { showToast } from './components/ToastHost.jsx'
import CookieConsentBanner from './components/CookieConsentBanner.jsx'
import Privacy from './pages/Privacy.jsx'
import Cookies from './pages/Cookies.jsx'
import './App.css'
export default function App() {
@@ -24,8 +27,19 @@ export default function App() {
const [inboxOpen, setInboxOpen] = useState(false)
const [unreadCount, setUnreadCount] = useState(0)
const [inboxTick, setInboxTick] = useState(0)
// §14.5: a tick that, when bumped, asks <CookieConsentBanner> to
// re-open even if the user has already made a choice. The settings
// "Privacy & cookies" tab dispatches a `rfc-app:cookie-consent-reopen`
// event that bumps this.
const [consentReopenTick, setConsentReopenTick] = useState(0)
const navigate = useNavigate()
useEffect(() => {
const handler = () => setConsentReopenTick(t => t + 1)
window.addEventListener('rfc-app:cookie-consent-reopen', handler)
return () => window.removeEventListener('rfc-app:cookie-consent-reopen', handler)
}, [])
useEffect(() => {
getMe()
.then(setMe)
@@ -134,6 +148,10 @@ export default function App() {
<Route path="/login" element={<Login />} />
<Route path="/beta-pending" element={<BetaPending />} />
<Route path="/philosophy" element={<PhilosophyWithSidebar viewer={viewer} />} />
{/* §14.5 / §14.6: cookie-consent companions to /philosophy.
Available to anonymous and authenticated viewers alike. */}
<Route path="/privacy" element={<PolicyShell><Privacy /></PolicyShell>} />
<Route path="/cookies" element={<PolicyShell><Cookies /></PolicyShell>} />
{viewer && (
<Route path="/settings/notifications" element={<NotificationSettingsWithSidebar viewer={viewer} />} />
)}
@@ -174,10 +192,18 @@ export default function App() {
<Inbox onClose={() => setInboxOpen(false)} lastChangeTick={inboxTick} />
)}
<ToastHost />
<CookieConsentBanner viewer={viewer} forceOpen={consentReopenTick} />
</div>
)
}
function PolicyShell({ children }) {
// §14.5 / §14.6 policy pages reuse the chrome-pane shape so they
// render full-width without the catalog rail. The components inside
// carry their own back affordance per Philosophy.jsx's pattern.
return <main className="chrome-pane">{children}</main>
}
function PhilosophyWithSidebar({ viewer }) {
// The chrome surfaces (§14.2 philosophy, §15 settings, §6/§17 admin)
// all use the full app body no catalog left pane, no propose modal.
+60
View File
@@ -49,6 +49,49 @@ export async function verifyOtc(email, code) {
return jsonOrThrow(res)
}
// ── v0.10.0: user-set passcodes after OTC (§6.2, roadmap item #8) ─────────
//
// After a successful OTC sign-in, a contributor may set a passcode and
// use email + passcode for subsequent sign-ins. OTC remains the
// forgot-passcode fallback — 5 consecutive verify failures locks the
// passcode path for 15 minutes (HTTP 423); the OTC path is unaffected.
export async function checkPasscode(email) {
// Anonymous endpoint. Returns `{has_passcode: boolean}` so the
// Login.jsx flow can decide whether to render a passcode input or
// fall back to OTC. We URL-encode the email so addresses with '+'
// round-trip cleanly.
const params = new URLSearchParams({ email })
const res = await fetch(`/auth/passcode/check?${params}`)
return jsonOrThrow(res)
}
export async function verifyPasscode(email, passcode) {
const res = await fetch('/auth/passcode/verify', {
method: 'POST',
headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' },
body: JSON.stringify({ email, passcode }),
})
return jsonOrThrow(res)
}
export async function setPasscode(passcode) {
// Requires an active session — the server returns 401 if not signed
// in. The signed-in user is the implicit subject; the body carries
// only the new passcode.
const res = await fetch('/auth/passcode/set', {
method: 'POST',
headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' },
body: JSON.stringify({ passcode }),
})
return jsonOrThrow(res)
}
export async function clearPasscode() {
const res = await fetch('/auth/passcode', { method: 'DELETE' })
return jsonOrThrow(res)
}
export async function listRFCs() {
return jsonOrThrow(await fetch('/api/rfcs'))
}
@@ -532,6 +575,23 @@ export async function setQuietHours({ start, end, timezone } = {}) {
}))
}
// v0.13.0 / roadmap item #11: cookie consent (SPEC §14.5).
export async function getCookieConsent() {
return jsonOrThrow(await fetch('/api/users/me/cookie-consent'))
}
export async function setCookieConsent({ analytics, other } = {}) {
return jsonOrThrow(await fetch('/api/users/me/cookie-consent', {
method: 'PUT',
headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' },
body: JSON.stringify({
essential: true,
analytics: !!analytics,
other: !!other,
}),
}))
}
export async function muteUser(userId) {
return jsonOrThrow(await fetch(`/api/users/${userId}/notification-mute`, { method: 'POST' }))
}
@@ -0,0 +1,164 @@
// CookieConsentBanner.jsx v0.13.0 / roadmap item #11 / SPEC §14.5.
//
// A non-modal bottom-of-page banner that asks the user once which
// categories of cookies they accept. The framework's strictly-necessary
// cookies (session, signed payloads) are always on; the user can opt in
// or out of analytics (which gates the §13 SDK landing in v0.15.0) and
// "other" (third-party embeds, social widgets if a deployment adds any).
//
// Visible until the user makes a choice. Hides itself once the choice
// is recorded. The /settings/notifications "Privacy & cookies" tab
// surfaces the current choice and re-opens the banner via `forceOpen`.
import { useEffect, useState } from 'react'
import { Link } from 'react-router-dom'
import { getConsent, setConsent, hasChosen, hydrateFromServer } from '../lib/consent.js'
import { getCookieConsent, setCookieConsent } from '../api.js'
const CATEGORIES = [
{
key: 'essential-only',
label: 'Essential only',
description: 'Just the cookies the app needs to keep you signed in and protect submissions. (Sign-in session, signed payloads.)',
flags: { analytics: false, other: false },
},
{
key: 'essential-analytics',
label: 'Essential + analytics',
description: 'Adds anonymous usage analytics so the framework can see which surfaces get used. No third-party scripts beyond the analytics SDK.',
flags: { analytics: true, other: false },
},
{
key: 'essential-analytics-other',
label: 'Essential + analytics + other',
description: 'Adds analytics plus any third-party embeds the deployment configures (e.g. social widgets). Choose this if you want the full surface.',
flags: { analytics: true, other: true },
},
]
function selectionKeyFor(consent) {
if (consent.analytics && consent.other) return 'essential-analytics-other'
if (consent.analytics && !consent.other) return 'essential-analytics'
return 'essential-only'
}
export default function CookieConsentBanner({ viewer, forceOpen, onClosed }) {
const [open, setOpen] = useState(() => forceOpen || !hasChosen())
const [choice, setChoice] = useState(() => selectionKeyFor(getConsent()))
const [saving, setSaving] = useState(false)
const [error, setError] = useState(null)
// When forceOpen flips (settings "Change" affordance), re-render the
// banner and pre-select the user's current choice.
useEffect(() => {
if (forceOpen) {
setOpen(true)
setChoice(selectionKeyFor(getConsent()))
}
}, [forceOpen])
// Server-side hydrate for authenticated viewers per the v0.13.0
// precedence rule: a server row overrides local; absent server row,
// upload the local choice.
useEffect(() => {
if (!viewer?.user_id) return
let cancelled = false
getCookieConsent()
.then(record => {
if (cancelled) return
if (record.recorded_at) {
// Server is authoritative adopt + hide the banner unless
// the settings page forced it open.
hydrateFromServer(record)
setChoice(selectionKeyFor(record))
if (!forceOpen) setOpen(false)
} else if (hasChosen()) {
// Local has a choice the server doesn't know about yet push.
const local = getConsent()
setCookieConsent({ analytics: local.analytics, other: local.other })
.then(r => hydrateFromServer(r))
.catch(() => {})
}
})
.catch(() => {
// Network or auth error leave the local-only path in place.
})
return () => { cancelled = true }
}, [viewer?.user_id]) // eslint-disable-line react-hooks/exhaustive-deps
if (!open) return null
async function save() {
setSaving(true)
setError(null)
const picked = CATEGORIES.find(c => c.key === choice) || CATEGORIES[0]
try {
setConsent(picked.flags)
if (viewer?.user_id) {
// Best-effort server persistence. A failure here doesn't
// invalidate the local choice; the banner still hides because
// the user expressed their preference. The server can catch up
// on the next sign-in via the hydrate path above.
try {
const r = await setCookieConsent(picked.flags)
hydrateFromServer(r)
} catch (e) {
setError(`Saved locally; server sync failed (${e.message}).`)
}
}
setOpen(false)
onClosed?.()
} finally {
setSaving(false)
}
}
return (
<div className="cookie-consent-banner" role="region" aria-label="Cookie consent">
<div className="cookie-consent-body">
<h2 className="cookie-consent-title">Cookies &amp; privacy</h2>
<p className="cookie-consent-intro">
This site uses cookies. Essential cookies keep you signed in and
protect your submissions; analytics and other cookies are
optional. Choose what you allow you can change this any time
from <Link to="/settings/notifications">Settings &rarr; Privacy &amp; cookies</Link>.
</p>
<fieldset className="cookie-consent-choices">
<legend className="visually-hidden">Cookie categories</legend>
{CATEGORIES.map(c => (
<label key={c.key} className={`cookie-consent-choice ${choice === c.key ? 'is-selected' : ''}`}>
<input
type="radio"
name="cookie-consent-choice"
value={c.key}
checked={choice === c.key}
onChange={() => setChoice(c.key)}
disabled={saving}
/>
<span className="cookie-consent-choice-text">
<span className="cookie-consent-choice-label">{c.label}</span>
<span className="cookie-consent-choice-desc">{c.description}</span>
</span>
</label>
))}
</fieldset>
<p className="cookie-consent-links">
<Link to="/cookies">Cookies policy</Link>
<span aria-hidden> &middot; </span>
<Link to="/privacy">Privacy policy</Link>
</p>
{error && <p className="cookie-consent-error">{error}</p>}
<div className="cookie-consent-actions">
<button
type="button"
className="btn-primary"
onClick={save}
disabled={saving}
>
{saving ? 'Saving…' : 'Save choice'}
</button>
</div>
</div>
</div>
)
}
+255 -23
View File
@@ -1,18 +1,31 @@
// Login.jsx v0.7.0's primary sign-in surface (§6.2).
// Login.jsx v0.7.0's email + OTC sign-in surface (§6.2), extended
// in v0.10.0 with passcode sign-in (roadmap item #8).
//
// Two-step:
// 1. Enter email POST /auth/otc/request on 200, advance.
// On 429 (rate-limit), surface a "wait a moment" hint and keep
// the user on step 1.
// 2. Enter the six-digit code from the email POST /auth/otc/verify
// on 200, redirect to the post-login landing. Cmd/Ctrl+Enter
// on the code field is the keyboard shortcut.
// Three-to-five-step flow:
// 1. Enter email GET /auth/passcode/check.
// * If `has_passcode`: advance to step 'passcode'.
// * Otherwise: POST /auth/otc/request, advance to step 'code'.
// 2a. Step 'passcode': enter passcode POST /auth/passcode/verify.
// * On 200: redirect to /.
// * On 423: passcode is locked (5 consecutive failures); the
// UI auto-falls back to OTC by requesting a fresh code.
// * On 400: wrong passcode; the user can retry or click
// "Use a code instead" to fall back to OTC manually.
// 2b. Step 'code' (the v0.7.0 path): enter the six-digit code
// POST /auth/otc/verify on 200, the server has signed in the
// user. If the user has no passcode set, we show step
// 'offer-passcode' inviting them to set one for faster sign-in
// next time. Dismiss skips to /; "Set passcode" advances to
// step 'set-passcode'.
// 3. Step 'set-passcode': enter a passcode POST /auth/passcode/set
// redirect to /. The user can also "Skip for now".
//
// Server-side, /auth/otc/request always returns 202 for an unrecognized
// email (so the allowlist gate doesn't leak), so this surface never
// distinguishes "we couldn't reach you" from "we don't know you"
// it just advances to step 2. If a user is genuinely blocked, the
// code never arrives.
// distinguishes "we couldn't reach you" from "we don't know you". The
// check endpoint also returns `has_passcode: false` for an unknown
// email so an unknown email always lands in the OTC path, no
// account-enumeration signal.
//
// The legacy Gitea OAuth callback remains at /auth/login /auth/callback
// during the v0.7.0 migration; we surface a "Sign in with Gitea" link
@@ -21,21 +34,36 @@
import { useEffect, useRef, useState } from 'react'
import { useNavigate, Link } from 'react-router-dom'
import { requestOtc, verifyOtc } from '../api'
import {
requestOtc,
verifyOtc,
checkPasscode,
verifyPasscode,
setPasscode as apiSetPasscode,
} from '../api'
export default function Login() {
// Steps: 'email' 'passcode' or 'code' (after OTC verify) optional
// 'offer-passcode' optional 'set-passcode'. The latter two only
// appear on the OTC path for accounts that don't yet have a passcode.
const [step, setStep] = useState('email')
const [email, setEmail] = useState('')
const [code, setCode] = useState('')
const [passcode, setPasscode] = useState('')
const [newPasscode, setNewPasscode] = useState('')
const [status, setStatus] = useState('')
const [busy, setBusy] = useState(false)
const emailRef = useRef(null)
const codeRef = useRef(null)
const passcodeRef = useRef(null)
const newPasscodeRef = useRef(null)
const navigate = useNavigate()
useEffect(() => {
if (step === 'email') emailRef.current?.focus()
else codeRef.current?.focus()
else if (step === 'code') codeRef.current?.focus()
else if (step === 'passcode') passcodeRef.current?.focus()
else if (step === 'set-passcode') newPasscodeRef.current?.focus()
}, [step])
async function submitEmail(e) {
@@ -47,20 +75,68 @@ export default function Login() {
setBusy(true)
setStatus('')
try {
await requestOtc(email.trim())
setStep('code')
setStatus('Check your inbox — a six-digit code is on the way.')
const { has_passcode } = await checkPasscode(email.trim())
if (has_passcode) {
setStep('passcode')
setStatus('')
} else {
await requestOtc(email.trim())
setStep('code')
setStatus('Check your inbox — a six-digit code is on the way.')
}
} catch (err) {
if (err.status === 429) {
setStatus('Slow down — wait a minute before requesting another code.')
} else {
setStatus(err.message || 'Could not request a code. Try again.')
setStatus(err.message || 'Could not start sign-in. Try again.')
}
} finally {
setBusy(false)
}
}
async function submitPasscode(e) {
if (e) e.preventDefault()
if (!passcode.trim()) {
setStatus('Enter your passcode.')
return
}
setBusy(true)
setStatus('')
try {
await verifyPasscode(email.trim(), passcode.trim())
window.location.assign('/')
} catch (err) {
if (err.status === 423) {
// Lockout auto-fall back to OTC. The OTC request endpoint
// is independent of the passcode lockout, so this lands a
// fresh code in the user's inbox immediately.
setPasscode('')
try {
await requestOtc(email.trim())
setStep('code')
setStatus(
'Too many failed attempts. We sent a one-time code to your email — use it to sign in.',
)
} catch (e2) {
if (e2.status === 429) {
setStep('code')
setStatus(
'Too many failed attempts. Wait a minute, then request a one-time code to sign in.',
)
} else {
setStatus(
'Too many failed attempts. Use the "Use a code instead" link to sign in via email.',
)
}
}
} else {
setStatus('Wrong passcode. Try again, or use a one-time code instead.')
}
setBusy(false)
}
}
async function submitCode(e) {
if (e) e.preventDefault()
if (!code.trim() || code.trim().length !== 6) {
@@ -71,16 +147,43 @@ export default function Login() {
setStatus('')
try {
await verifyOtc(email.trim(), code.trim())
// Reload so App.jsx's getMe() picks up the fresh session. We
// navigate to "/" via a hard load so any cached "anonymous"
// view state in memory is dropped cleanly.
window.location.assign('/')
// OTC verified. If the user has no passcode, offer to set one
// before redirecting. We re-read `has_passcode` from the server
// rather than caching the step-1 result because the user could
// have set a passcode in another tab between then and now.
const { has_passcode } = await checkPasscode(email.trim())
if (has_passcode) {
window.location.assign('/')
} else {
setStep('offer-passcode')
setBusy(false)
}
} catch (err) {
setStatus('That code is invalid or expired. Try again, or request a new code.')
setBusy(false)
}
}
async function submitNewPasscode(e) {
if (e) e.preventDefault()
const pc = newPasscode.trim()
if (pc.length < 4) {
setStatus('Passcode must be at least 4 characters.')
return
}
setBusy(true)
setStatus('')
try {
await apiSetPasscode(pc)
window.location.assign('/')
} catch (err) {
// 422 carries the validation message verbatim (denylist /
// length); surface it as-is so the user knows what to change.
setStatus(err.message || 'Could not set passcode. Try a different one.')
setBusy(false)
}
}
function onCodeKey(e) {
// §6.2 ergonomic: Cmd/Ctrl+Enter submits from the code field.
if ((e.metaKey || e.ctrlKey) && e.key === 'Enter') {
@@ -88,12 +191,44 @@ export default function Login() {
}
}
function onPasscodeKey(e) {
if ((e.metaKey || e.ctrlKey) && e.key === 'Enter') {
submitPasscode(e)
}
}
function backToEmail() {
setStep('email')
setCode('')
setPasscode('')
setStatus('')
}
async function fallbackToOtc() {
// Manual "Use a code instead" from the passcode step. Same shape
// as the email-step OTC dispatch.
setBusy(true)
setStatus('')
try {
await requestOtc(email.trim())
setPasscode('')
setStep('code')
setStatus('Check your inbox — a six-digit code is on the way.')
} catch (err) {
if (err.status === 429) {
setStatus('Slow down — wait a minute before requesting another code.')
} else {
setStatus(err.message || 'Could not request a code. Try again.')
}
} finally {
setBusy(false)
}
}
function skipPasscodeOffer() {
window.location.assign('/')
}
return (
<div className="otc-login">
<div className="otc-login-inner">
@@ -101,7 +236,8 @@ export default function Login() {
{step === 'email' && (
<form onSubmit={submitEmail}>
<p className="otc-hint">
Enter your email. We'll send you a one-time code.
Enter your email. If you've set a passcode, you'll enter that
next; otherwise we'll send a one-time code.
</p>
<input
ref={emailRef}
@@ -114,10 +250,49 @@ export default function Login() {
disabled={busy}
/>
<button type="submit" disabled={busy || !email.trim()}>
{busy ? 'Sending…' : 'Send code'}
{busy ? 'Checking…' : 'Continue'}
</button>
</form>
)}
{step === 'passcode' && (
<form onSubmit={submitPasscode}>
<p className="otc-hint">
Enter the passcode for <strong>{email}</strong>.
</p>
<input
ref={passcodeRef}
type="password"
autoComplete="current-password"
value={passcode}
onChange={e => setPasscode(e.target.value)}
onKeyDown={onPasscodeKey}
placeholder="Your passcode"
required
disabled={busy}
/>
<div className="otc-actions">
<button type="submit" disabled={busy || !passcode.trim()}>
{busy ? 'Signing in…' : 'Sign in'}
</button>
<button
type="button"
className="btn-link-quiet"
onClick={fallbackToOtc}
disabled={busy}
>
Use a code instead
</button>
<button
type="button"
className="btn-link-quiet"
onClick={backToEmail}
disabled={busy}
>
Use a different email
</button>
</div>
</form>
)}
{step === 'code' && (
<form onSubmit={submitCode}>
<p className="otc-hint">
@@ -155,6 +330,63 @@ export default function Login() {
</p>
</form>
)}
{step === 'offer-passcode' && (
<div className="otc-offer-passcode">
<p className="otc-hint">
You're signed in. Want to set a passcode for faster sign-in
next time? You can always use a one-time code instead and
you can change or remove the passcode from your settings.
</p>
<div className="otc-actions">
<button
type="button"
onClick={() => { setStep('set-passcode'); setStatus('') }}
>
Set a passcode
</button>
<button
type="button"
className="btn-link-quiet"
onClick={skipPasscodeOffer}
>
Skip for now
</button>
</div>
</div>
)}
{step === 'set-passcode' && (
<form onSubmit={submitNewPasscode}>
<p className="otc-hint">
Pick a passcode (420 characters). You'll use it with your
email to sign in next time.
</p>
<input
ref={newPasscodeRef}
type="password"
autoComplete="new-password"
value={newPasscode}
onChange={e => setNewPasscode(e.target.value)}
placeholder="New passcode"
required
disabled={busy}
minLength={4}
maxLength={20}
/>
<div className="otc-actions">
<button type="submit" disabled={busy || newPasscode.trim().length < 4}>
{busy ? 'Saving…' : 'Save passcode'}
</button>
<button
type="button"
className="btn-link-quiet"
onClick={skipPasscodeOffer}
disabled={busy}
>
Skip for now
</button>
</div>
</form>
)}
{status && <p className="otc-status">{status}</p>}
<p className="otc-fallback">
<Link to="/philosophy">Read the philosophy </Link>
@@ -28,7 +28,12 @@ import {
unmuteUser,
muteUser,
searchUsers,
getCookieConsent,
getMe,
setPasscode,
clearPasscode,
} from '../api.js'
import { getConsent, onConsentChange, hydrateFromServer } from '../lib/consent.js'
const CHURN_REFUSAL = 'Per-commit and per-message email is intentionally not offered. The digest aggregates this activity weekly.'
@@ -48,10 +53,223 @@ export default function NotificationSettings({ viewer }) {
<QuietHoursSection />
<WatchesSection />
<MutesSection viewer={viewer} />
<SignInSection />
<PrivacyCookiesSection />
</div>
)
}
// §6.2 sign-in (v0.10.0 / roadmap item #8): passcode management
function SignInSection() {
// Source of truth for `has_passcode` and `passcode_set_at` is the
// /api/auth/me payload (v0.10.0 added both fields). We re-read after
// every mutation so the surface reflects what just landed.
const [me, setMe] = useState(null)
const [error, setError] = useState(null)
const [mode, setMode] = useState('idle') // 'idle' | 'set' | 'change'
const [draft, setDraft] = useState('')
const [busy, setBusy] = useState(false)
const [savedNote, setSavedNote] = useState('')
useEffect(() => {
getMe()
.then(payload => setMe(payload.user || null))
.catch(e => setError(e.message))
}, [])
async function refresh() {
const payload = await getMe()
setMe(payload.user || null)
}
async function save(e) {
if (e) e.preventDefault()
const pc = draft.trim()
if (pc.length < 4) {
setError('Passcode must be at least 4 characters.')
return
}
setBusy(true)
setError(null)
setSavedNote('')
try {
await setPasscode(pc)
setDraft('')
setMode('idle')
setSavedNote('Passcode saved.')
await refresh()
} catch (err) {
// 422 carries the validation message verbatim (denylist /
// length); surface it as-is so the user knows what to change.
setError(err.message || 'Could not save passcode. Try a different one.')
} finally {
setBusy(false)
setTimeout(() => setSavedNote(''), 2000)
}
}
async function remove() {
if (!confirm('Remove your passcode? You will sign in with a one-time code next time.')) {
return
}
setBusy(true)
setError(null)
setSavedNote('')
try {
await clearPasscode()
setSavedNote('Passcode removed.')
await refresh()
} catch (err) {
setError(err.message || 'Could not remove passcode.')
} finally {
setBusy(false)
setTimeout(() => setSavedNote(''), 2000)
}
}
if (!me) return <SectionShell title="Sign-in" subtitle={error || 'Loading…'} />
const hasPasscode = !!me.has_passcode
return (
<SectionShell
title="Sign-in"
subtitle="How you sign in. A passcode lets you skip the one-time-code email; the one-time-code path is always available as a fallback (and as the recovery path if you forget your passcode)."
>
<div className="settings-row">
<span className="settings-note">
<strong>Passcode:</strong>{' '}
{hasPasscode ? 'Set.' : 'Not set — you sign in with a one-time code each time.'}
</span>
</div>
{hasPasscode && me.passcode_set_at && (
<p className="settings-note muted">Set on {me.passcode_set_at}.</p>
)}
{mode === 'idle' && (
<div className="settings-row">
{hasPasscode ? (
<>
<button
className="btn-primary"
onClick={() => { setMode('change'); setDraft(''); setError(null) }}
disabled={busy}
>
Change passcode
</button>
<button
className="btn-link-muted"
onClick={remove}
disabled={busy}
>
Remove passcode
</button>
</>
) : (
<button
className="btn-primary"
onClick={() => { setMode('set'); setDraft(''); setError(null) }}
disabled={busy}
>
Set passcode
</button>
)}
</div>
)}
{(mode === 'set' || mode === 'change') && (
<form className="settings-row" onSubmit={save}>
<label>
{mode === 'change' ? 'New passcode' : 'Passcode'}
<input
type="password"
autoComplete="new-password"
value={draft}
onChange={e => setDraft(e.target.value)}
placeholder="420 characters"
minLength={4}
maxLength={20}
required
disabled={busy}
/>
</label>
<button className="btn-primary" type="submit" disabled={busy || draft.trim().length < 4}>
{busy ? 'Saving…' : 'Save'}
</button>
<button
type="button"
className="btn-link-muted"
onClick={() => { setMode('idle'); setDraft(''); setError(null) }}
disabled={busy}
>
Cancel
</button>
</form>
)}
{savedNote && <p className="settings-note">{savedNote}</p>}
{error && <p className="settings-note warning">{error}</p>}
</SectionShell>
)
}
// §14.5 cookie / privacy consent (v0.13.0 / roadmap item #11)
function PrivacyCookiesSection() {
const [consent, setConsent] = useState(() => getConsent())
useEffect(() => {
// Pull the server-side row on mount; if it has a recorded_at the
// local snapshot is updated via hydrate.
getCookieConsent()
.then(record => { if (record.recorded_at) hydrateFromServer(record) })
.catch(() => {})
return onConsentChange(next => setConsent(next))
}, [])
function reopenBanner() {
// App.jsx listens for this event and bumps the forceOpen tick on
// <CookieConsentBanner>. The banner pre-selects the current choice
// from the snapshot, so the user can revise rather than restart.
window.dispatchEvent(new CustomEvent('rfc-app:cookie-consent-reopen'))
}
const summary = (() => {
if (!consent.recorded_at) {
return 'No choice recorded — the consent banner is being shown to you.'
}
if (consent.analytics && consent.other) {
return 'Essential + analytics + other.'
}
if (consent.analytics) {
return 'Essential + analytics.'
}
return 'Essential only.'
})()
return (
<SectionShell
title="Privacy & cookies"
subtitle="What categories of cookies you've allowed. Essential cookies are always on; analytics and other categories are opt-in."
>
<div className="settings-row">
<span className="settings-note"><strong>Current choice:</strong> {summary}</span>
</div>
{consent.recorded_at && (
<p className="settings-note muted">Recorded {consent.recorded_at}.</p>
)}
<div className="settings-row">
<button className="btn-primary" onClick={reopenBanner}>
Change
</button>
<Link to="/cookies" className="btn-link-muted">Cookies policy</Link>
<Link to="/privacy" className="btn-link-muted">Privacy policy</Link>
</div>
</SectionShell>
)
}
// §15.4 email category toggles
function EmailPreferencesSection() {
+154
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,154 @@
// consent.js — cookie / privacy consent state (v0.13.0, SPEC §14.5).
//
// The framework's analytics SDK gating (roadmap item #13, target v0.15.0)
// will read from this module. v0.13.0 ships the storage + the banner +
// the on-change pub/sub; no analytics SDK ships yet.
//
// Shape of a consent record:
//
// { essential: true, analytics: bool, other: bool, recorded_at: string | null }
//
// `essential` is always true at the API surface; it's included for
// symmetry. `recorded_at` is null when the user has not yet made a
// choice — the banner is shown until it's non-null.
//
// Precedence:
// - Anonymous viewer: localStorage is the only source.
// - Authenticated viewer: on sign-in, the server row (if any) overrides
// local; if the server has no row, the local choice is uploaded.
//
// The fan-out is intentionally tiny — three flags. The banner writes
// once; subscribers re-read on demand via `getConsent()` and can
// register `onConsentChange(cb)` to be notified of subsequent updates.
//
// IMPORTANT: don't import this from analytics SDKs that themselves
// set cookies on load. Read consent first, then conditionally `import()`
// the SDK module — that's the contract item #13 will follow.
const LS_KEY = 'rfc-app.cookie-consent.v1'
const DEFAULT = Object.freeze({
essential: true,
analytics: false,
other: false,
recorded_at: null,
})
const listeners = new Set()
function readLocal() {
try {
const raw = localStorage.getItem(LS_KEY)
if (!raw) return null
const parsed = JSON.parse(raw)
if (!parsed || typeof parsed !== 'object') return null
return normalize(parsed)
} catch {
return null
}
}
function writeLocal(record) {
try {
localStorage.setItem(LS_KEY, JSON.stringify(normalize(record)))
} catch {
// localStorage may be unavailable (private mode, disabled storage).
// In that case we behave as if no choice was ever made — the banner
// shows on every load. Acceptable per §14.5: the user can still
// refuse to consent on each visit.
}
}
function normalize(record) {
return {
essential: true,
analytics: !!record.analytics,
other: !!record.other,
recorded_at: record.recorded_at || null,
}
}
// In-memory snapshot. Initialised lazily on first read so the module
// import order doesn't matter; refreshed by `setConsent` and
// `hydrateFromServer`.
let _snapshot = null
function snapshot() {
if (_snapshot == null) {
_snapshot = readLocal() || { ...DEFAULT }
}
return _snapshot
}
function emit() {
for (const cb of listeners) {
try { cb(snapshot()) } catch {}
}
}
/** Read the current consent record. Always returns a normalized object;
* `recorded_at: null` means the user has not yet chosen. */
export function getConsent() {
return snapshot()
}
/** True if the user has made a choice. The banner uses this to decide
* whether to render itself on load. */
export function hasChosen() {
return snapshot().recorded_at != null
}
/** Subscribe to consent updates. Returns an unsubscribe function. */
export function onConsentChange(cb) {
listeners.add(cb)
return () => listeners.delete(cb)
}
/** Write a new choice locally and emit. Returns the new snapshot. The
* server-side persistence path is handled separately by the banner /
* settings surface via the API client; this helper is for both anon
* and authenticated callers because localStorage is the always-on
* layer (the server row is a backup that survives sign-out). */
export function setConsent({ analytics = false, other = false } = {}) {
const next = normalize({
analytics,
other,
recorded_at: new Date().toISOString(),
})
_snapshot = next
writeLocal(next)
emit()
return next
}
/** Adopt a server-side record as authoritative. Called by the banner /
* settings surface after sign-in when the server returns a non-null
* recorded_at. Updates local + memory + emits to subscribers. */
export function hydrateFromServer(record) {
if (!record || !record.recorded_at) return snapshot()
const next = normalize(record)
_snapshot = next
writeLocal(next)
emit()
return next
}
/** Reset local state used by the settings "Change" affordance to
* re-prompt the banner. Does not touch the server row; the user must
* re-confirm a choice and the banner uploads on save. */
export function clearLocal() {
try { localStorage.removeItem(LS_KEY) } catch {}
_snapshot = { ...DEFAULT }
emit()
return _snapshot
}
// Cross-tab sync: if another tab writes the key, mirror the change here.
// Wrapped in a guard so SSR / non-browser test contexts don't blow up.
if (typeof window !== 'undefined' && typeof window.addEventListener === 'function') {
window.addEventListener('storage', e => {
if (e.key !== LS_KEY) return
_snapshot = readLocal() || { ...DEFAULT }
emit()
})
}
+125
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
// Cookies.jsx v0.13.0 / roadmap item #11 / SPEC §14.6.
//
// Lists the framework's cookies, by category, with each cookie's
// purpose. Deployments override via `VITE_COOKIES_POLICY_URL` (linked
// below the framework's stub list, same shape as the privacy page).
//
// Keeping the list in source makes the framework self-documenting:
// when a future framework release adds or removes a cookie, this page
// is the change-record. Item #13's analytics SDK will add its own row
// to the analytics-category list in v0.15.0.
import { useNavigate, Link } from 'react-router-dom'
const COOKIES = [
{
name: 'rfc_session',
category: 'Essential',
purpose: "Signed session cookie that remembers who you're signed in as. itsdangerous-signed; HttpOnly; SameSite=Lax.",
lifetime: 'Session (cleared on sign-out).',
},
{
name: 'rfc-app.cookie-consent.v1',
category: 'Essential',
purpose: 'localStorage entry (not a cookie strictly, but tracked here for symmetry) that remembers your consent choice on this device. Cleared on browser data reset.',
lifetime: 'Until cleared.',
},
]
export default function Cookies() {
const navigate = useNavigate()
const deploymentUrl = (import.meta.env.VITE_COOKIES_POLICY_URL || '').trim()
const appName = import.meta.env.VITE_APP_NAME || 'this deployment'
return (
<div className="policy-page">
<header className="policy-header">
<button
className="policy-back"
onClick={() => (history.length > 1 ? navigate(-1) : navigate('/'))}
>
Back
</button>
<span className="policy-title">Cookies policy</span>
</header>
<article className="policy-body">
<h1>Cookies policy</h1>
<p className="policy-subtitle">
What {appName} stores in your browser, by category.
</p>
<h2>Categories</h2>
<ul>
<li>
<strong>Essential</strong> required for the app to keep
you signed in, protect submissions, and remember your
consent choice. Cannot be switched off (without these the
app cannot function).
</li>
<li>
<strong>Analytics</strong> optional anonymous usage
telemetry. Off by default; opt-in via the consent banner.
As of v0.13.0 no analytics SDK ships; roadmap item #13
(v0.15.0) adds one behind this gate.
</li>
<li>
<strong>Other</strong> third-party embeds, social
widgets, or anything else the deployment chooses to enable.
Off by default; opt-in via the consent banner. The
framework ships no such cookies by default.
</li>
</ul>
<h2>Current cookies set by the framework</h2>
<table className="policy-table">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Name</th>
<th>Category</th>
<th>Purpose</th>
<th>Lifetime</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
{COOKIES.map(c => (
<tr key={c.name}>
<td><code>{c.name}</code></td>
<td>{c.category}</td>
<td>{c.purpose}</td>
<td>{c.lifetime}</td>
</tr>
))}
</tbody>
</table>
<h2>Manage your choice</h2>
<p>
Change your consent any time from{' '}
<Link to="/settings/notifications">
Settings &rarr; Privacy &amp; cookies
</Link>. The "Change" affordance re-opens the consent banner
with your current selection pre-loaded.
</p>
{deploymentUrl ? (
<>
<h2>Deployment-specific cookies</h2>
<p>
This deployment may add additional cookies on top of the
framework's. See the full deployment policy at:
</p>
<p>
<a href={deploymentUrl} target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">
{deploymentUrl}
</a>
</p>
</>
) : null}
<p className="policy-footnote">
See also the <Link to="/privacy">privacy policy</Link>.
</p>
</article>
</div>
)
}
+118
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
// Privacy.jsx v0.13.0 / roadmap item #11 / SPEC §14.5.
//
// The framework's default privacy policy page. Reachable by anonymous
// and authenticated viewers alike at `/privacy`. The text below is a
// minimal stub that describes the framework's stance; deployments are
// expected to override it via the `VITE_PRIVACY_POLICY_URL` env var.
//
// When `VITE_PRIVACY_POLICY_URL` is set:
// - http(s) URL the page renders the framework's stub above a
// "Read the full deployment policy" link to the configured URL.
// We don't iframe-embed third-party policy hosts because their
// Content-Security-Policy frequently refuses framing; the link is
// the predictable affordance.
//
// The framework's stub is intentionally short the rules that matter
// to a user are: (1) what categories of cookies the app sets, (2) how
// to change consent, (3) where to reach the deployment operator with a
// complaint. Each deployment's content repo can carry a fuller version.
import { useNavigate, Link } from 'react-router-dom'
export default function Privacy() {
const navigate = useNavigate()
const deploymentUrl = (import.meta.env.VITE_PRIVACY_POLICY_URL || '').trim()
const appName = import.meta.env.VITE_APP_NAME || 'this deployment'
return (
<div className="policy-page">
<header className="policy-header">
<button
className="policy-back"
onClick={() => (history.length > 1 ? navigate(-1) : navigate('/'))}
>
Back
</button>
<span className="policy-title">Privacy policy</span>
</header>
<article className="policy-body">
<h1>Privacy policy</h1>
<p className="policy-subtitle">
What {appName} stores, why, and how to control it.
</p>
<h2>What we store</h2>
<p>
{appName} runs on the Wiggleverse RFC framework. The framework
stores the identity you sign in with (your Gitea login,
display name, email, and avatar URL), the proposals and edits
you author, the discussion threads you participate in, and
your notification preferences. Authoring is public by design
this is a framework for public-async RFC work, and threads,
changes, and PRs are visible to anyone who reaches the
deployment. Settings (notification toggles, quiet hours, mute
list, cookie consent) are private to your account.
</p>
<h2>Cookies</h2>
<p>
The app sets a small set of cookies. The full list is on the{' '}
<Link to="/cookies">cookies policy page</Link>. You can choose
which categories you allow from the consent banner shown on
your first visit or from <Link to="/settings/notifications">
Settings &rarr; Privacy &amp; cookies</Link> any time
afterwards.
</p>
<h2>Analytics</h2>
<p>
The framework supports an optional anonymous analytics layer
gated behind your consent choice. As of v0.13.0 no analytics
SDK ships in the framework; deployments that enable analytics
do so via a later framework version (roadmap item #13). The
consent toggle exists today so the gate is already in place
when the SDK lands.
</p>
<h2>Your data, your control</h2>
<ul>
<li>Revoke cookie consent any time from settings.</li>
<li>
Edit notification preferences including the global email
opt-out from{' '}
<Link to="/settings/notifications">notification settings</Link>.
</li>
<li>
Your authored content (proposals, threads, edits) is public
and not retractable from the meta-repo's Git history. If you
need a redaction, reach the deployment operator directly.
</li>
</ul>
{deploymentUrl ? (
<>
<h2>Deployment-specific policy</h2>
<p>
This deployment may layer additional policy on top of the
framework's defaults. Read the full deployment policy at:
</p>
<p>
<a href={deploymentUrl} target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">
{deploymentUrl}
</a>
</p>
</>
) : (
<>
<h2>Deployment contact</h2>
<p>
For deployment-specific privacy questions data subject
requests, redaction requests, complaints contact the
operator of {appName}.
</p>
</>
)}
</article>
</div>
)
}