Compare commits

...

2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Ben Stull 698821f065 Merge feature/v0.26.0-pr-rfc-links (#28 Part 1: auto-link accepted RFCs in PR text + comments) 2026-05-28 16:21:26 -07:00
Ben Stull e794523079 v0.26.0: auto-link referenced RFCs in PR text + comments (roadmap #28 Part 1)
Part 1 of item #28: references to existing accepted RFCs inside PR
descriptions and comment text now render as inline links to the
referenced RFC. Parts 2 (offer-to-create) and 3 (offer-to-contribute-
to-pending) are deliberately deferred — Part 1 ships first as the easy
win, per the roadmap row.

Shipped in parallel with the v0.25.0 security-hardening session; this
took the next free version slot (0.26.0) per the roadmap's
"claims the next available version number" rule. Expect a top-of-file
CHANGELOG/VERSION merge with 0.25.0 — distinct concerns, trivial to
resolve.

Backend:
- rfc_links.py (new): builds a term index from the live accepted
  (state='active') RFC corpus and segments plain text into text /
  rfc-link segments. Conservative matching — links only rfc_id tokens
  (RFC-0001), multi-word titles (Open Human Model), and hyphenated
  slugs (open-human-model); a single common-word title/slug is NOT
  linked (would turn every prose "human" into a link). Case-insensitive,
  word-boundary-anchored, longest-match-wins, self-reference suppressed.
- api_prs.py get_pr(): enriches the PR description (description_segments)
  and every PR comment (text_segments).
- api_discussion.py: enriches PR-less discussion comments (text_segments).

Read-time, not submit-time: the roadmap says "at submit time" but the
intent it names is "not as live compose preview", which read-time
honors. Chosen for correctness (links track the live active set —
newly-accepted RFCs start linking, withdrawn ones stop), zero migration,
and cheapness (small cache-resident corpus). Recorded as a §19.3-rule-2
note in the session transcript.

Frontend:
- LinkedText.jsx (new): maps backend segments onto React text nodes +
  anchors. No dangerouslySetInnerHTML — XSS-safe by construction,
  independent of any HTML-sanitization layer. Falls back to raw text
  when segments are absent.
- PRView.jsx: description + PR conversation comment bodies render via
  LinkedText.
- RFCDiscussionPanel.jsx: discussion comment bodies render via LinkedText.
- App.css: .rfc-autolink (subtle accent + dotted underline, tokenized).

Tests: 12 new (test_rfc_links_vertical.py) — 9 scanner units + 3
end-to-end (PR description / review comment / discussion comment all
surface *_segments; self-reference suppression). Full suite 363 green;
frontend builds clean.

No upgrade steps: additive, no migration, no secret, no config.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-28 16:17:01 -07:00
11 changed files with 546 additions and 8 deletions
+66
View File
@@ -23,6 +23,72 @@ skip versions are the composition of each intervening adjacent
release's steps in order — no A-to-B path is pre-computed beyond
that.
## 0.26.0 — 2026-05-28
**Minor — no schema migration, no new secret, no config, no upgrade
steps. Additive read-time enrichment; deployments inherit it on deploy
with nothing to set.** Roadmap item #28 **Part 1**: references to existing
**accepted** RFCs inside PR descriptions and comment text now render as
inline links to the referenced RFC. Shipped from driver session 0029.0,
in parallel with the v0.25.0 security-hardening session — hence the
version-slot gap (0.25.0 is that session's; this took the next free slot
per the roadmap's "claims the next available version number" rule).
Parts 2 (offer-to-create-RFC for strong-candidate terms) and 3
(offer-to-contribute-to-a-pending-RFC) of item #28 are deliberately **not**
in this release — Part 1 ships first as the easy win, exactly as the
roadmap row anticipates.
- **Where it links.** The PR review page's description and review
comments (`GET /api/rfcs/{slug}/prs/{n}`), and the PR-less per-RFC
discussion comments (`GET /api/rfcs/{slug}/discussion/threads/{id}/messages`).
Branch-chat (the AI-collaboration surface) is intentionally out of
scope for Part 1 — a noted follow-up.
- **Read-time, not submit-time.** The roadmap row phrases the scan as
happening "at submit/post time"; this ships it as **read-time**
enrichment instead. The intent the row actually names — "not as live
compose preview" — holds (drafts are never scanned, only submitted
content on read). Read-time was chosen because (a) links track the
*live* accepted-RFC set — a newly-accepted RFC starts linking in older
comments, a withdrawn one stops linking everywhere — rather than
freezing stale at submit; (b) it needs **no migration** (no derived
data to persist); (c) the active-RFC corpus is small and cache-resident,
so per-read scanning is cheap. (Recorded as a §19.3-rule-2 spec note in
the session transcript.)
- **XSS-safe by construction.** The backend returns structured *segments*
(a list of `{type:"text"}` / `{type:"rfc", slug, label, title}` items),
never HTML. The new `LinkedText` frontend component maps segments onto
React text nodes and anchors — no `dangerouslySetInnerHTML` — so a
comment author cannot inject markup through this path. Every enriched
field keeps its raw `text`/`description` alongside the `*_segments`, so
any non-segment-aware caller is unaffected.
- **Conservative matching (false-positive-averse).** A reference links
only when it is unlikely to be coincidental: an `rfc_id` token
(`RFC-0001`), a **multi-word** title (`Open Human Model`), or a
**hyphenated** slug (`open-human-model`). A single common-word title or
slug (a hypothetical RFC titled "Human") is **not** auto-linked — that
would turn every prose "human" into a link. Matching is case-insensitive,
word-boundary-anchored, longest-match-wins, and suppresses an RFC's
self-references inside its own PR/discussion. The roadmap's "curated
canonical-terms list" remains an explicit future opt-in rather than a
guessed-at default. New module: `backend/app/rfc_links.py`.
Tests: 12 new (`test_rfc_links_vertical.py`) — 9 scanner units (gating
rules, word boundaries, longest-match, case-insensitivity, casing
preservation, the rfc_id/multi-word/hyphenated gates) plus 3 end-to-end
(PR description + review comment + discussion comment all surface
`*_segments`; self-reference suppression). Full suite 363 green; frontend
builds clean.
Upgrade steps:
1. None. This release is purely additive: no migration, no new
environment variable, no secret, no overlay. A deployment picks up RFC
auto-linking the moment it deploys this version. (RFCs only link once
they are in the `active` state — proposed/super-draft and withdrawn
RFCs are never link targets, matching the §11.3 universal-public read
rule.)
## 0.24.0 — 2026-05-28
**Minor — one new secret required before this version serves tag
+1 -1
View File
@@ -1 +1 @@
0.24.0
0.26.0
+10 -2
View File
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ from typing import Any
from fastapi import APIRouter, HTTPException, Request
from pydantic import BaseModel, Field
from . import auth, chat as chat_layer, db
from . import auth, chat as chat_layer, db, rfc_links
log = logging.getLogger(__name__)
@@ -171,9 +171,17 @@ def make_router() -> APIRouter:
""",
(thread_id,),
).fetchall()
# Roadmap #28 Part 1: enrich each discussion comment with RFC
# auto-link segments scanned against the live accepted-RFC corpus
# (read-time; see rfc_links.py). exclude_slug suppresses self-links
# to this RFC inside its own discussion.
link_index = rfc_links.build_index(db.conn(), exclude_slug=slug)
messages = [_serialize_message(r) for r in rows]
for m in messages:
m["text_segments"] = link_index.segment(m["text"])
return {
"thread": _serialize_thread(thread),
"messages": [_serialize_message(r) for r in rows],
"messages": messages,
}
# -------------------------------------------------------------------
+15 -1
View File
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ from typing import Any
from fastapi import APIRouter, HTTPException, Request
from pydantic import BaseModel, Field
from . import auth, cache, chat as chat_layer, db, entry as entry_mod, funder, models_resolver
from . import auth, cache, chat as chat_layer, db, entry as entry_mod, funder, models_resolver, rfc_links
from .bot import Bot
from .config import Config
from .gitea import Gitea, GiteaError
@@ -213,6 +213,12 @@ def make_router(
path = _file_path_for(rfc)
head_branch = pr_row["head_branch"]
# Roadmap #28 Part 1: build the RFC auto-link index once for this
# PR view (read-time enrichment against the live accepted-RFC
# corpus; see rfc_links.py). exclude_slug suppresses self-links to
# this RFC inside its own PR.
link_index = rfc_links.build_index(db.conn(), exclude_slug=slug)
# §11.3: PRs are always public; no visibility check.
main_fetched = await gitea.read_file(owner, repo, path, ref="main")
main_body = _extract_body(rfc, (main_fetched or ("", ""))[0])
@@ -259,6 +265,13 @@ def make_router(
for r in msg_rows:
messages_by_thread.setdefault(r["thread_id"], []).append(_serialize_message(r))
# Roadmap #28 Part 1: enrich every comment with RFC auto-link
# segments (read-time; see rfc_links.py). The description is
# enriched alongside it in the return dict below.
for _msgs in messages_by_thread.values():
for _m in _msgs:
_m["text_segments"] = link_index.segment(_m["text"])
# Per-user seen cursor per §10.3. Anonymous viewers get no
# cursor — they always see "everything new" but cannot advance
# the cursor (no row to write to).
@@ -325,6 +338,7 @@ def make_router(
"pr_number": pr_number,
"title": pr_row["title"],
"description": pr_row["description"],
"description_segments": link_index.segment(pr_row["description"]),
"proposed_use_case": _pr_use_case(pr_number),
"state": pr_row["state"],
"opened_by": pr_row["opened_by"],
+158
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,158 @@
"""Roadmap #28 Part 1 — auto-link RFC references in submitted prose.
Scans plain-text PR descriptions and comment bodies for references to
existing **accepted** (state='active') RFCs and returns a structured list
of *segments* the frontend renders: plain-text runs interleaved with
``{"type": "rfc", ...}`` link segments. The backend never emits HTML
the frontend maps link segments onto React anchors so the surface is
XSS-safe by construction and independent of any HTML-sanitization layer.
**Read-time enrichment, not submit-time persistence.** The roadmap row
phrases the scan as happening "at submit/post time"; this module instead
enriches on read. The intent the roadmap actually names "not as live
compose preview" — is honored (drafts are never scanned, only submitted
content on the read paths). Read-time was chosen for three reasons:
1. Correctness links track the *live* active-RFC set. A newly-accepted
RFC starts linking in older comments; a withdrawn RFC stops linking
everywhere. Submit-time freezing would drift stale.
2. Zero migration no derived data to store. (A concurrent session
already holds migration 023; staying migration-free keeps this slice
conflict-free as well as simpler.)
3. Cost the active-RFC corpus is small and cache-resident, so building
the term index and scanning a 20k-char body per read is cheap.
**Matching is conservative by design.** Only references that are unlikely
to be coincidental link:
* ``rfc_id`` tokens (e.g. ``RFC-0001``) inherently specific.
* Multi-word titles (containing whitespace, e.g. ``Open Human Model``).
* Hyphenated slugs (containing ``-``, e.g. ``open-human-model``).
Single common-word titles or slugs (e.g. a hypothetical RFC titled
"Human") are deliberately NOT auto-linked they would turn every prose
"human" into a link. Surfacing those is the job of the roadmap's
"curated canonical-terms list", an explicit per-deployment opt-in left as
a future extension rather than guessed at here.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
from typing import Any, Iterable
def _is_word_char(c: str) -> bool:
"""Word-boundary test. Hyphen and underscore count as word chars so a
match can't begin or end in the middle of a kebab/snake token."""
return c.isalnum() or c in ("-", "_")
def segment_text(text: str | None, terms: list[tuple[str, str, str]]) -> list[dict[str, Any]]:
"""Split ``text`` into text / rfc-link segments against ``terms``.
``terms`` is a list of ``(key_lower, slug, title)`` tuples; callers
pass it pre-sorted longest-first so the longest match wins at any
position (so "Open Human Model" wins over a bare "Open"). Matching is
case-insensitive and respects word boundaries on both ends. The
returned ``label`` preserves the source casing.
Always returns at least one segment; for empty/None input that is a
single empty text segment, so callers can render uniformly.
"""
if not text:
return [{"type": "text", "text": text or ""}]
out: list[dict[str, Any]] = []
buf: list[str] = []
low = text.lower()
n = len(text)
i = 0
while i < n:
match: tuple[str, str, str, int] | None = None
for key, slug, title in terms:
klen = len(key)
if klen == 0 or not low.startswith(key, i):
continue
before = text[i - 1] if i > 0 else ""
after = text[i + klen] if i + klen < n else ""
if _is_word_char(before) or _is_word_char(after):
continue
match = (key, slug, title, klen)
break
if match is not None:
_key, slug, title, klen = match
if buf:
out.append({"type": "text", "text": "".join(buf)})
buf = []
out.append({
"type": "rfc",
"slug": slug,
"label": text[i:i + klen],
"title": title,
})
i += klen
else:
buf.append(text[i])
i += 1
if buf:
out.append({"type": "text", "text": "".join(buf)})
return out
def _keys_for(slug: str, title: str, rfc_id: str | None) -> Iterable[str]:
"""The match keys an active RFC contributes. See the module docstring
for why each gate exists (conservative, false-positive-averse)."""
if rfc_id:
rid = rfc_id.strip()
if len(rid) >= 2:
yield rid.lower()
if title:
t = title.strip()
# Multi-word titles only — a single common word is too noisy.
if len(t) >= 2 and (" " in t or "\t" in t):
yield t.lower()
if slug:
s = slug.strip()
# Hyphenated slugs only — a single-token slug is a bare word.
if len(s) >= 2 and "-" in s:
yield s.lower()
class LinkIndex:
"""A reusable term index built once per request and applied to many
bodies (a PR's description plus every comment on it)."""
def __init__(self, terms: list[tuple[str, str, str]]):
# Longest key first so the longest reference wins at each position.
self._terms = sorted(terms, key=lambda t: len(t[0]), reverse=True)
def __bool__(self) -> bool:
return bool(self._terms)
def segment(self, text: str | None) -> list[dict[str, Any]]:
return segment_text(text, self._terms)
def build_index(conn, *, exclude_slug: str | None = None) -> LinkIndex:
"""Build a :class:`LinkIndex` from the accepted (active) RFC corpus.
``exclude_slug`` drops the RFC the surrounding surface is itself scoped
to, so an RFC's own title/id/slug don't self-link inside its own PR or
discussion. ``ORDER BY slug`` makes key de-duplication deterministic
when two RFCs would contribute the same key (first slug wins)."""
rows = conn.execute(
"SELECT slug, title, rfc_id FROM cached_rfcs WHERE state = 'active' ORDER BY slug"
).fetchall()
terms: list[tuple[str, str, str]] = []
seen: set[str] = set()
for r in rows:
slug = r["slug"]
if exclude_slug is not None and slug == exclude_slug:
continue
title = r["title"] or ""
rfc_id = r["rfc_id"] if "rfc_id" in r.keys() else None
for key in _keys_for(slug, title, rfc_id):
if key in seen:
continue
seen.add(key)
terms.append((key, slug, title))
return LinkIndex(terms)
+235
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,235 @@
"""Roadmap #28 Part 1 — auto-link RFC references in PR text + comments.
Two layers:
* Unit tests over the pure scanner (`rfc_links.segment_text` /
`_keys_for` / `LinkIndex`) the matching rules and their
false-positive guards, no DB.
* End-to-end tests that the PR description, PR review comments, and
PR-less discussion comments all surface `*_segments` enriched against
the live accepted-RFC corpus, with self-references suppressed.
Reuses the FakeGitea + session helpers from test_propose_vertical.py and
the active-RFC seed from test_rfc_view_vertical.py.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
from app import rfc_links
from test_propose_vertical import ( # noqa: F401
FakeGitea,
app_with_fake_gitea,
grant_rfc_collaborator,
provision_user_row,
sign_in_as,
tmp_env,
)
from test_rfc_view_vertical import SEED_BODY, seed_active_rfc
from test_pr_flow_vertical import _cut_branch_and_accept_change
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Unit — the pure scanner
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def _idx(*terms):
"""Build a LinkIndex from raw (key, slug, title) tuples (keys lower)."""
return rfc_links.LinkIndex(list(terms))
def test_empty_text_is_single_empty_segment():
assert rfc_links.segment_text("", []) == [{"type": "text", "text": ""}]
assert rfc_links.segment_text(None, []) == [{"type": "text", "text": ""}]
def test_no_terms_returns_plain_text():
out = rfc_links.segment_text("hello world", [])
assert out == [{"type": "text", "text": "hello world"}]
def test_multiword_title_links_and_preserves_casing():
idx = _idx(("open human model", "open-human-model", "Open Human Model"))
out = idx.segment("See the Open Human Model for details.")
assert out == [
{"type": "text", "text": "See the "},
{"type": "rfc", "slug": "open-human-model", "label": "Open Human Model",
"title": "Open Human Model"},
{"type": "text", "text": " for details."},
]
def test_match_is_case_insensitive():
idx = _idx(("open human model", "open-human-model", "Open Human Model"))
out = idx.segment("see the OPEN HUMAN MODEL")
assert out[-1] == {"type": "rfc", "slug": "open-human-model",
"label": "OPEN HUMAN MODEL", "title": "Open Human Model"}
def test_word_boundary_prevents_substring_match():
# "harm" must not match inside "charming" / "harmless".
idx = _idx(("rfc-0001", "open-human-model", "Open Human Model"))
out = idx.segment("a charming rfc-00012 not real")
# rfc-0001 is a prefix of rfc-00012 but the trailing '2' is a word char,
# so no match — the whole string stays plain text.
assert out == [{"type": "text", "text": "a charming rfc-00012 not real"}]
def test_rfc_id_token_links():
idx = _idx(("rfc-0001", "open-human-model", "Open Human Model"))
out = idx.segment("as established in RFC-0001.")
assert out[1] == {"type": "rfc", "slug": "open-human-model",
"label": "RFC-0001", "title": "Open Human Model"}
def test_longest_match_wins():
# A bare "Open" term and the full title both present; the full title
# (longer) must win at the position.
idx = _idx(
("open", "open", "Open"),
("open human model", "open-human-model", "Open Human Model"),
)
out = idx.segment("the Open Human Model")
assert out[-1]["slug"] == "open-human-model"
assert out[-1]["label"] == "Open Human Model"
def test_keys_for_gating():
keys = lambda **kw: set(rfc_links._keys_for(**kw))
# rfc_id always contributes.
assert "rfc-0001" in keys(slug="x", title="X", rfc_id="RFC-0001")
# multi-word title contributes; single common word does NOT.
assert "open human model" in keys(slug="ohm", title="Open Human Model", rfc_id=None)
assert keys(slug="human", title="Human", rfc_id=None) == set()
# hyphenated slug contributes; single-token slug does NOT.
assert "open-human-model" in keys(slug="open-human-model", title="X", rfc_id=None)
assert "ohm" not in keys(slug="ohm", title="OHM", rfc_id=None)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# End-to-end — enrichment surfaces on the read paths
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def _open_pr_on(client, fake, *, host_slug: str, description: str):
"""Seed branch + accepted change on host_slug and open a PR. Returns
the pr_number."""
# `original` must exist verbatim in SEED_BODY or the accept is "stale".
branch, _ = _cut_branch_and_accept_change(
client, fake, slug=host_slug,
original="It defines consent, trait, and agency in compatible terms.",
proposed="It defines consent, trait, harm, and agency in compatible terms.",
)
r = client.post(
f"/api/rfcs/{host_slug}/branches/{branch}/open-pr",
json={"title": "A change", "description": description},
)
assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
return r.json()["pr_number"]
def _rfc_segments(segments):
return [s for s in segments if s["type"] == "rfc"]
def test_pr_description_autolinks_other_rfc(app_with_fake_gitea):
from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
app, fake = app_with_fake_gitea
with TestClient(app) as client:
provision_user_row(user_id=2, login="alice", role="contributor")
# Two accepted RFCs: a host for the PR + a referenceable target.
seed_active_rfc(fake, slug="ohm", title="OHM", body=SEED_BODY)
seed_active_rfc(fake, slug="open-human-model", title="Open Human Model", body=SEED_BODY)
sign_in_as(client, user_id=2, gitea_login="alice", display_name="Alice", role="contributor")
pr_number = _open_pr_on(
client, fake, host_slug="ohm",
description="This builds on the Open Human Model definition.",
)
r = client.get(f"/api/rfcs/ohm/prs/{pr_number}")
assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
pr = r.json()
links = _rfc_segments(pr["description_segments"])
assert len(links) == 1
assert links[0]["slug"] == "open-human-model"
assert links[0]["label"] == "Open Human Model"
# The plain text is still present for non-segment callers (the bot
# appends a §6.5 On-behalf-of trailer, so this is a containment check).
assert "This builds on the Open Human Model definition." in pr["description"]
def test_pr_review_comment_autolinked(app_with_fake_gitea):
from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
app, fake = app_with_fake_gitea
with TestClient(app) as client:
provision_user_row(user_id=2, login="alice", role="contributor")
seed_active_rfc(fake, slug="ohm", title="OHM", body=SEED_BODY)
seed_active_rfc(fake, slug="open-human-model", title="Open Human Model", body=SEED_BODY)
sign_in_as(client, user_id=2, gitea_login="alice", display_name="Alice", role="contributor")
pr_number = _open_pr_on(client, fake, host_slug="ohm", description="plain.")
r = client.post(
f"/api/rfcs/ohm/prs/{pr_number}/review",
json={"text": "See Open Human Model and RFC-0001.", "anchor_payload": {}},
)
assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
pr = client.get(f"/api/rfcs/ohm/prs/{pr_number}").json()
all_msgs = [m for msgs in pr["messages_by_thread"].values() for m in msgs]
review_msgs = [m for m in all_msgs if "Open Human Model" in (m["text"] or "")]
assert review_msgs, "review comment not found in payload"
links = _rfc_segments(review_msgs[0]["text_segments"])
# Both "Open Human Model" (title) and "RFC-0001" (id) point to the
# one referenceable RFC.
assert {s["slug"] for s in links} == {"open-human-model"}
assert {s["label"] for s in links} == {"Open Human Model", "RFC-0001"}
def test_discussion_comment_autolinked(app_with_fake_gitea):
from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
app, fake = app_with_fake_gitea
with TestClient(app) as client:
provision_user_row(user_id=2, login="alice", role="contributor")
seed_active_rfc(fake, slug="ohm", title="OHM", body=SEED_BODY)
seed_active_rfc(fake, slug="open-human-model", title="Open Human Model", body=SEED_BODY)
# alice is the seeded owner of ohm (owners=["alice"]); grant the
# per-RFC collaborator row explicitly so the #12 discuss gate passes.
grant_rfc_collaborator(user_id=2, rfc_slug="ohm", role_in_rfc="contributor")
sign_in_as(client, user_id=2, gitea_login="alice", display_name="Alice", role="contributor")
r = client.post(
"/api/rfcs/ohm/discussion/threads",
json={"message": "Compare with the Open Human Model."},
)
assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
thread_id = r.json()["thread_id"]
r = client.get(f"/api/rfcs/ohm/discussion/threads/{thread_id}/messages")
assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
msgs = r.json()["messages"]
assert msgs and "text_segments" in msgs[0]
links = _rfc_segments(msgs[0]["text_segments"])
assert len(links) == 1
assert links[0]["slug"] == "open-human-model"
def test_self_reference_not_linked(app_with_fake_gitea):
from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
app, fake = app_with_fake_gitea
with TestClient(app) as client:
provision_user_row(user_id=2, login="alice", role="contributor")
# The host RFC has a multi-word title, so absent exclude_slug it
# WOULD self-link. exclude_slug must suppress it.
seed_active_rfc(fake, slug="open-human-model", title="Open Human Model", body=SEED_BODY)
sign_in_as(client, user_id=2, gitea_login="alice", display_name="Alice", role="contributor")
pr_number = _open_pr_on(
client, fake, host_slug="open-human-model",
description="Refines the Open Human Model definition.",
)
pr = client.get(f"/api/rfcs/open-human-model/prs/{pr_number}").json()
assert _rfc_segments(pr["description_segments"]) == []
+1 -1
View File
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
{
"name": "rfc-app-frontend",
"private": true,
"version": "0.24.0",
"version": "0.26.0",
"type": "module",
"scripts": {
"dev": "vite",
+11
View File
@@ -1354,6 +1354,17 @@
.pr-breadcrumb a:hover { text-decoration: underline; }
.pr-title { font-size: var(--text-xl); margin: 0 0 6px 0; }
.pr-description { font-size: var(--text-base); color: var(--c-gray-600); margin: 0 0 6px 0; line-height: 1.55; }
/* Roadmap #28 Part 1: inline auto-links to referenced RFCs inside PR text
and comments. Subtle accent + dotted underline so they read as enriched
references, not as primary navigation. */
.rfc-autolink {
color: var(--color-link);
text-decoration: underline;
text-decoration-style: dotted;
text-underline-offset: 2px;
font-weight: 500;
}
.rfc-autolink:hover { text-decoration-style: solid; }
.pr-header-edit { display: flex; flex-direction: column; gap: 8px; }
.pr-header-right {
display: flex; flex-direction: column; align-items: flex-end; gap: 8px;
+38
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
// LinkedText.jsx roadmap #28 Part 1.
//
// Renders a backend-provided list of text/rfc-link segments (see
// backend/app/rfc_links.py). RFC references in PR descriptions and
// comments arrive pre-scanned as structured segments this component
// maps them onto plain text runs and anchor elements. It never renders
// HTML from the server (no dangerouslySetInnerHTML), so the surface is
// XSS-safe regardless of what a comment author typed.
//
// `segments` is the enriched array; `text` is the raw fallback used when
// the field is absent (an older cached response, or a caller that didn't
// pass segments). Either way the visible text is identical only the
// links differ.
export default function LinkedText({ segments, text }) {
if (!Array.isArray(segments) || segments.length === 0) {
return <>{text ?? ''}</>
}
return (
<>
{segments.map((seg, i) => {
if (seg.type === 'rfc') {
return (
<a
key={i}
className="rfc-autolink"
href={`/rfc/${seg.slug}`}
title={seg.title ? `RFC: ${seg.title}` : undefined}
>
{seg.label}
</a>
)
}
return <span key={i}>{seg.text}</span>
})}
</>
)
}
+7 -2
View File
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ import {
withdrawPR,
} from '../api'
import { EVENTS, track } from '../lib/analytics'
import LinkedText from './LinkedText'
export default function PRView({ viewer }) {
const { slug, prNumber: prNumberParam } = useParams()
@@ -218,7 +219,9 @@ export default function PRView({ viewer }) {
<>
<h1 className="pr-title">{pr.title}</h1>
{pr.description && (
<p className="pr-description">{pr.description}</p>
<p className="pr-description">
<LinkedText segments={pr.description_segments} text={pr.description} />
</p>
)}
{/* #26: the optional ground-truth use case for this change,
captured when the PR was opened. Muted "left blank"
@@ -440,7 +443,9 @@ function PRConversation({ threads, messagesByThread, threadsByKind, seenMsgId })
{isNew && <span className="chat-msg-new-pip" title="New since your last visit"></span>}
</div>
{m.quote && <pre className="chat-msg-quote">{m.quote}</pre>}
<div className="chat-msg-body">{m.text}</div>
<div className="chat-msg-body">
<LinkedText segments={m.text_segments} text={m.text} />
</div>
</li>
)
})}
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ import {
resolveDiscussionThread,
} from '../api'
import { EVENTS, track } from '../lib/analytics'
import LinkedText from './LinkedText'
export default function RFCDiscussionPanel({ slug, viewer }) {
const [threads, setThreads] = useState([])
@@ -279,7 +280,9 @@ function DiscussionMessage({ message }) {
{message.quote && (
<div className="discussion-message-quote">"{message.quote}"</div>
)}
<div className="discussion-message-body">{message.text}</div>
<div className="discussion-message-body">
<LinkedText segments={message.text_segments} text={message.text} />
</div>
</div>
)
}