docs: CONTRIBUTING.md + SPEC.md §21 analytics chapter

Lands roadmap item #19 (CONTRIBUTING + transcript-linked onboarding)
and #21 Part B (standing analytics instrumentation discipline) as a
single docs commit. No code change, no version bump — these ride a
future release or land as a no-bump docs commit at the operator's
discretion.

CONTRIBUTING.md (new):
  - Project-evolution framing pointing at wiggleverse/ohm-session-history
    as the authoritative how-we-got-here record.
  - Worked-example links into Sessions E (clean small release),
    I (recovery from deploy fault), K (multi-feature wave with
    operator-secret pause), L (squash-merge across three parallel
    features + #21 Part C identity-lifecycle wiring).
  - PR-shape contract: subagents push feature branches; operator
    tags + deploys (the pattern driver sessions use).
  - CHANGELOG strict-descending convention.
  - RFC 2119 keyword discipline for Upgrade-steps blocks (per §20.4).
  - §19.2 candidate discipline — architectural deferrals get noted
    rather than scope-creeping a release.
  - Test-coverage expectations characterized from the actual
    ~250-test backend pytest surface (no frontend test runner today;
    the discipline is build-clean + backend HTTP contract coverage).
  - Operator-only gestures explicitly enumerated (no tagging, no
    deploying, no pin moves, no secret bytes in conversation).
  - Analytics instrumentation checklist (#21 Part B's CONTRIBUTING
    artifact): named events, autocapture-friendly DOM, replay
    masking, PR description discipline.

SPEC.md §21 (new chapter — Analytics instrumentation and identity):
  - Placed AFTER §20 versioning rather than between §15 and §16, to
    avoid renumbering §19.2 / §19.3 — those numbers are load-bearing
    project nouns referenced from CLAUDE.md, transcripts, and prior
    commits. §15 carries a new forward-pointer naming §21 as the
    peer chapter.
  - §21.1 event-taxonomy conventions (Title Case "Subject Verb",
    snake_case props, no PII).
  - §21.2 required prop families per event kind, including the
    hashed-target_email convention for invite-side events that
    target a not-yet-user (#12).
  - §21.3 autocapture-friendly DOM patterns (stable text,
    aria-label on icon-only buttons, data-amp-track-* on
    repeated rows, data-amp-track-suppress for noise surfaces).
  - §21.4 session-replay masking — credentials MUST be masked,
    PII SHOULD be masked, privacy policy MUST match reality.
  - §21.5 consent-gate contract — pre-consent no init / no
    network / no recording; granted→denied → setOptOut(true)
    within one tick.
  - §21.6 identity lifecycle (per #21 Part C) — identify with
    user_id + properties on sign-in; setUserProperties on
    mid-session change; anonymize on sign-out (after the
    User Signed Out track); identify-BEFORE-track on invite-claim
    paths. §21.6.1 set vs setOnce taxonomy with explicit classification
    rule.
  - §21.7 cohort-shape implications (informative — what the
    Amplitude dashboard can actually answer with the conventions).
  - §21.8 secret-vs-public framing for the overlay binding —
    Amplitude browser key is public (bundle-embedded), Turnstile
    secret half is real-secret; canonical pbpaste-pipe gesture
    for the operator.
  - §21.9 new §19.2 candidates surfaced (session-replay-specific
    consent category, bundle-size budget measurement, property-
    shape CI lint, centralized email-hash helper).
  - §21.10 open question (consent-category split timing).

Grounded in real code: the SPEC chapter cites
frontend/src/lib/analytics.js v0.15.0 + the v0.16.0 (AcceptInvitation)
+ v0.17.0 (InviteClaim) inline #21 Part C wiring as worked examples.
RFC 2119 keywords used precisely throughout.

CONTRIBUTING.md

@@ -0,0 +1,407 @@
+# Contributing to rfc-app
+
+`rfc-app` is the framework that hosts RFC-shaped collections of
+documents — one repo per RFC, a meta repo per collection, a web app
+that turns the Git substrate into a writeable surface. The Open
+Human Model (OHM) deployment at `ohm.wiggleverse.org` is one
+instance. The framework is intended to host more.
+
+This document explains how to propose a change to the framework
+itself — a new endpoint, a schema migration, a UI affordance, a
+spec clarification. For changes to *content* hosted by a specific
+deployment (the OHM RFCs, the OHM roadmap), see that deployment's
+own contribution guide (e.g. [`ohm-rfc/CONTRIBUTING.md`](https://git.wiggleverse.org/wiggleverse/ohm-rfc/src/branch/main/CONTRIBUTING.md)).
+
+---
+
+## How the project actually evolves
+
+rfc-app is built in the open in the literal sense: **every build
+session produces a full transcript** at
+[`wiggleverse/ohm-session-history`](https://git.wiggleverse.org/wiggleverse/ohm-session-history)
+on `git.wiggleverse.org`. The transcripts are the authoritative
+record of how the framework got from one release to the next — the
+decisions, the friction, the dead ends, the reasoning. They are not
+curated retrospectives; wrong turns stay in.
+
+If you are proposing a change to rfc-app, **read at least the most
+recent session transcript before opening a PR.** The transcripts
+show what shape a feature lands in, where the spec gets touched,
+what the operator pushes back on, and how the release rides into
+deployment. A PR that matches that texture is much more likely to
+land cleanly than one shaped by the README alone.
+
+Worked examples to start with:
+
+- **Session E** ([transcript](https://git.wiggleverse.org/wiggleverse/ohm-session-history)) —
+  a clean small release. Read this for the simplest possible release
+  shape: one feature, one version bump, one upgrade-steps block, no
+  surprises.
+- **Session I** — recovery from a deploy fault. Read this for how
+  the project handles things going wrong mid-deploy, and for the
+  honest no-curation discipline.
+- **Session K** — a multi-feature wave with one item paused on an
+  operator-provided secret. Read this for the subagent dispatch
+  pattern (the model the project uses to ship multiple features in
+  parallel), and for the binding rule that the assistant **never**
+  asks the operator to paste secret bytes into the conversation.
+- **Session L** — squash-merge integration across three parallel
+  features (v0.15.0 / v0.16.0 / v0.17.0), with `#21 Part C`
+  identity-lifecycle Amplitude wiring folded inline across all
+  three releases. Read this for how cross-cutting concerns (analytics,
+  observability) get layered into already-in-flight features
+  without scope-creeping any single release.
+
+The repository where transcripts live —
+[`wiggleverse/ohm-session-history`](https://git.wiggleverse.org/wiggleverse/ohm-session-history) —
+is the canonical history. The `git log` of `rfc-app` is the artifact;
+the transcripts are the story behind it.
+
+---
+
+## How a contribution flows
+
+The framework runs on a **subagents push feature branches; operator
+tags and deploys** model. Contributors — whether human or AI agents
+running in a Claude Code subsession — open feature branches and
+submit PRs. The operator (the person running the deployment) is the
+one who merges, tags, bumps `VERSION`, runs `flotilla deploy` (or
+the equivalent for non-OHM deployments), and moves the deployment's
+`.rfc-app-version` pin. The driver session transcripts inherit
+this shape; contributors inherit it from them.
+
+Concretely:
+
+1. Read the most recent session transcript. Understand what just
+   shipped and what is in flight.
+2. Open an Issue first if your change is exploratory, structural,
+   or might overlap with in-flight work. The operator will name
+   any collision.
+3. Branch from `main`. Name the branch
+   `feature/<short-description>` for additive work, `fix/<short-
+   description>` for bug fixes, `docs/<short-description>` for
+   documentation-only work. The driver sessions use
+   `feature/v<target-version>-<slug>` (e.g.
+   `feature/v0.16.0-owner-invite`) — that shape is welcome but not
+   required for outside contributors, since contributors do not
+   pick the target version.
+4. **Do not bump `VERSION` or `frontend/package.json#version` in
+   your PR.** The operator picks the target version at integration
+   time; bumping ahead causes cherry-pick conflicts. The same
+   applies to the `CHANGELOG.md` entry header — see below.
+5. **Do not tag releases, do not run any deploy gesture, do not
+   touch any deployment's `.rfc-app-version` pin.** The operator
+   alone owns those gestures. (For OHM specifically: "I'm the only
+   one that gets to yolo." See the boundary section in
+   `ohm-rfc/CONTRIBUTING.md`.)
+6. Push your branch and open a PR. Describe what you're proposing
+   and why, in language the operator can paste into the eventual
+   release commit. If the change touches `SPEC.md`, name which
+   section(s) and the contract change.
+
+---
+
+## CHANGELOG convention: strict descending
+
+`CHANGELOG.md` is ordered **newest-on-top**. The header line for
+the in-progress version goes at the top of the file; older
+releases descend below it. This is the binding convention; the
+operator hand-resolves the conflict when two parallel feature
+branches both insert at the top of the file (the squash-merge
+integration that ships parallel-feature waves keeps the strict-
+descending shape — see Session K for the cherry-pick mechanics and
+Session L for the hand-resolved-with-a-small-script variant).
+
+A new entry has this shape (read the existing 0.15.0 / 0.16.0 /
+0.17.0 entries for worked examples):
+
+```markdown
+## 0.X.Y — YYYY-MM-DD
+
+**Minor — schema migration auto-applied; no operator action.** This
+release ships <one or two sentences naming the feature and why>.
+
+### Added
+- **<New module/endpoint/component>** — what it does, where it lives,
+  why it exists. Include file paths inline so a reader can click through.
+### Changed
+- **<Existing surface>** — what changed and how a deployment notices.
+### Migration
+- **`<NNN_name>.sql`** — auto-applied by `db.run_migrations()` on
+  backend start. <Describe the schema delta in one sentence.>
+### Upgrade steps (from 0.(X-1).Y)
+- You **MUST** … (per RFC 2119; see SPEC.md §20.4).
+- You **MUST NOT** …
+- You **SHOULD** …
+- You **MAY** …
+```
+
+The header version number is filled in by the operator at merge
+time. Your PR's CHANGELOG diff can leave the version as
+`0.X.Y — YYYY-MM-DD` (literal placeholder), or use a guessed value
+the operator overwrites; either is fine.
+
+---
+
+## `Upgrade steps:` blocks use RFC 2119 keywords
+
+If your change requires deployments to do anything when they
+upgrade — set an env var, apply a migration, restart a process,
+flip an overlay value, accept a behavioral change — your CHANGELOG
+entry **must** include an `### Upgrade steps` block, and that
+block **must** use the [RFC 2119](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119)
+/ [RFC 8174](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8174) keywords as
+defined in `SPEC.md` §20.4:
+
+- **MUST** / **SHALL** / **REQUIRED** — without this step the
+  deployment will not function correctly. Skipping is a regression
+  the framework does not handle.
+- **MUST NOT** / **SHALL NOT** — previously valid, now no longer
+  supported.
+- **SHOULD** / **RECOMMENDED** — the framework's tested path. A
+  deployment may deviate when it has a reason.
+- **SHOULD NOT** / **NOT RECOMMENDED** — discouraged without being
+  forbidden.
+- **MAY** / **OPTIONAL** — an affordance you can take or skip.
+
+Cross-version upgrades (jumping more than one minor) are computed by
+the operator composing each intervening release's steps in order.
+Each adjacent step must therefore be locally unambiguous — this is
+the whole reason the keyword discipline is binding. Avoid words
+like "should probably" or "might want to" inside an upgrade step;
+either the framework needs the action or it doesn't.
+
+If your change touches the env contract, **also update**
+`backend/.env.example` and/or `frontend/.env.example` in the same
+PR so the contract and the documentation land together (§20.4).
+
+---
+
+## SPEC.md and §19.2 candidates
+
+`SPEC.md` is the framework's binding spec. It is honest about open
+questions — large sections of it carry "§19.2 candidates," which
+are decisions the project has deliberately deferred rather than
+guessed at.
+
+The discipline: **architectural or process deferrals get noted as
+§19.2 candidates rather than scope-creeping a release.** When you
+notice that your change opens a question larger than the change
+itself (a different DB shape, a new auth contract, a cross-cutting
+UX rethink), the right move is usually to land the narrow change
+and add a §19.2 candidate naming the larger question. The candidate
+documents what was set aside and why, so a future session can pick
+it up with context.
+
+Worked examples from recent sessions:
+
+- v0.11.0 (Session K) shipped device trust and surfaced three new
+  §19.2 candidates: cross-device session revocation, password-
+  equivalent change invalidating trust, device-trust window
+  tunables via env. None of those were in the v0.11.0 scope; they
+  were noted in SPEC.md §19.2 so a future session can address them
+  on their own terms.
+- v0.15.0 (Session L) shipped the Amplitude wrapper and added
+  candidates around session-replay-specific consent category +
+  bundle-size measurement, both deferred to the future Part-A audit.
+
+When you spot a deferred decision in your PR's territory, name it
+in your PR description and add it to `SPEC.md` §19.2 in the same
+diff. Do not silently expand scope to settle it.
+
+---
+
+## Test-coverage expectations
+
+The backend has the load-bearing test suite at
+`backend/tests/`. Tests are organized as `*_vertical.py` files,
+each covering one feature end-to-end through the FastAPI app
+(provisioning fixtures, hitting the HTTP surface, asserting on the
+database state). At time of writing, the suite is ~250 tests across
+~25 files. Examples:
+
+- `test_admin_create_user_invite_vertical.py` — v0.17.0's
+  admin-create user + invite + claim flow, 15 tests covering happy
+  path + every refusal shape + the audit-trail row.
+- `test_rfc_invitations_vertical.py` — v0.16.0's per-RFC invite +
+  accept flow, 18 tests.
+- `test_device_trust_vertical.py` — v0.11.0's 30-day device trust,
+  14 tests including cookie shape, hash-vs-raw-token discipline,
+  expired / revoked / forged / cross-user invariants.
+
+Expected coverage for a new feature:
+
+- **Backend feature** — one new `test_<feature>_vertical.py` file
+  that covers the happy path, every documented refusal/error code,
+  and any cross-surface effect (rows the feature writes to existing
+  tables, fields it adds to existing endpoints). Reuse fixtures
+  from neighboring test files (e.g. `test_propose_vertical.py`'s
+  `FakeGitea` is widely reused).
+- **Migration** — verify migrations are reachable from `backend/.venv`
+  before pushing: `cd backend && PYTHONPATH=. .venv/bin/pytest -q`
+  exercises `db.run_migrations()` through the fixture setup.
+- **Frontend feature** — there is currently no frontend test
+  runner. The discipline is: keep the change ships-clean
+  (`cd frontend && npm run build` succeeds), and the backend
+  vertical test exercises the HTTP contract the frontend
+  consumes, which is the meaningful behavioral guarantee.
+  Frontend changes that ride along with a backend feature land
+  with the backend test as the regression boundary.
+- **Bug fix** — add a regression test in the same vertical file
+  that proves the original failure mode and verifies the fix.
+
+Run the backend suite before pushing. From `backend/`:
+
+```bash
+PYTHONPATH=. .venv/bin/pytest -q
+```
+
+(The `PYTHONPATH=.` is a known ergonomic gap — see SPEC.md §19.2
+candidate; the suite does not pick up `app/` without it.)
+
+If your PR doesn't include tests, the operator will ask for them
+before merge unless the change is genuinely test-irrelevant
+(documentation, comments, dev-only tooling).
+
+---
+
+## Analytics instrumentation checklist
+
+> *(This section codifies `ohm-rfc/ROADMAP.md` #21 Part B's
+> CONTRIBUTING checklist. It is discipline, not a gate — but the
+> operator will push back on PRs that skip it.)*
+
+If your PR adds or changes a user-facing feature, walk this
+checklist before opening the PR. The instrumentation conventions
+themselves are specified in `SPEC.md` §21 (Analytics instrumentation
+and identity); this section is the procedural reminder.
+
+1. **What named event(s) does this feature need?**
+   Open `frontend/src/lib/analytics.js` and look at the `EVENTS`
+   constant. Does an existing event cover your feature? If not, is
+   the new event in the spec's "Subject Verb" Title Case form
+   (`Comment Posted`, `Invitation Sent`)? Are the prop families
+   consistent with SPEC.md §21's required-prop catalog (opaque
+   ids only, no PII, enums lowercased like `'otc'` not `'OTC'`)?
+
+2. **Do interactive elements have stable text / ARIA labels /
+   `data-amp-track-*` so autocapture is meaningful?**
+   The frontend ships `autocapture: true`, which instruments
+   every click and form interaction. The *value* of those events
+   depends on the DOM the SDK sees: a `<button>` with stable
+   visible text or an `aria-label` shows up as a meaningful
+   dashboard row; an icon-only `<button>` with no label shows up
+   as garbage. New components that introduce interactive elements
+   should either carry meaningful labels (visible text or ARIA) or
+   carry a `data-amp-track-name="<Stable Name>"` attribute. For
+   repeated rows (per-RFC lists, comment lists), use a stable
+   `data-amp-track-*` identifier so per-row click counts aggregate
+   to the row's identity rather than to a generic label.
+
+3. **Does any new form field need replay masking?**
+   Session replay records at `sampleRate: 1` (100% of consented
+   sessions). New form inputs that capture passwords, OTC codes,
+   tokens, magic-link URLs, or other secret/credential-equivalent
+   material **MUST** be masked with Amplitude's masking conventions
+   (the `.amp-mask` class or the `data-amp-mask` attribute,
+   whichever the wrapper integration expects in this version).
+   New inputs that capture arguably-PII (email, real name, free-
+   text drafts) **SHOULD** also be masked; if a deliberate
+   un-masking decision is taken, document it in the PR description
+   and in `SPEC.md` §21.
+
+4. **Does the PR description name the instrumentation decisions?**
+   A one-sentence summary in the PR description — "fires
+   `Comment Posted` with `{rfc_slug, comment_id}`; no new form
+   fields, no new replay-masking concerns" — is enough. If the
+   decision is "we chose not to instrument this," say that too;
+   the absence of an event is itself a decision the operator
+   wants visible. The relevant SPEC chapter (§21) is the binding
+   reference for what shapes are correct.
+
+If your feature touches an identity-meaningful surface (sign-in,
+sign-out, invite-claim, role change, account state change), also
+walk the **identity lifecycle** contract in SPEC.md §21.6: every
+new claim/sign-in path **MUST** call `identify({ user_id, properties })`
+BEFORE the first `track()` event on that surface, so the Amplitude
+user record is created with the OHM user_id from the very first
+event rather than as an anonymous device that retroactively links.
+v0.16.0's `AcceptInvitation.jsx` and v0.17.0's `InviteClaim.jsx`
+are the worked examples; mirror their shape.
+
+---
+
+## The operator-only gestures
+
+Some gestures are operator-only. Contributors do not perform them;
+PRs that perform them get rejected on principle, not on merit:
+
+- **Tagging a release** (`git tag v0.X.Y` + `git push --tags`).
+- **Pushing to `main`** after merge (the operator merges; the
+  framework's `main` branch tracks releases the operator has
+  shipped).
+- **Bumping `VERSION` and `frontend/package.json#version` to the
+  shipped value.** The operator does this at integration time so
+  the version line is consistent across the release commit.
+- **Running `flotilla deploy` or any equivalent deployment gesture**
+  in any deployment of rfc-app. Contributors do not deploy.
+- **Moving a deployment's `.rfc-app-version` pin.** That pin lives
+  in the deployment's content repo (e.g. `ohm-rfc/.rfc-app-version`)
+  and is moved by the deployment's operator. Contributors to that
+  deployment do not move it; contributors to the framework
+  certainly do not.
+- **Setting secrets** (anywhere — Secret Manager, env files,
+  `flotilla secret set`, vendor dashboards, anything). The
+  binding rule baked in mid-Session-K is: **the assistant never
+  asks the operator to paste secret bytes into a conversation,
+  even as one offered option**. The corollary for contributors:
+  do not include secret values in PR descriptions, commit
+  messages, or issue comments. Reference secrets by their binding
+  name (`SMTP_PASSWORD`, `AMPLITUDE_API_KEY`) and let the
+  operator handle the bytes.
+
+If your change requires a new secret or env var, document the
+requirement in the CHANGELOG `### Upgrade steps` block in the
+RFC 2119 form ("operators **MUST** set `<NEW_VAR>` ...") and
+update the `*.env.example` file. The operator will run the
+secret/overlay-set gesture themselves at deploy time.
+
+---
+
+## When in doubt
+
+- **Open an Issue first.** Especially for any change that touches
+  SPEC.md, the auth/permissions model (§6), the storage shape (§4
+  / §5), or the deploy contract (§20). The operator (or a future
+  driver session) will name what they want before you write code.
+- **Read the most recent session transcript.** It will tell you
+  what shipped last and what's in flight.
+- **Cite SPEC.md sections in your PR description.** "Touches §15.4
+  (per-category email toggles) and adds §19.2 candidate around
+  per-channel mute granularity" gives the operator a map of where
+  to read.
+
+---
+
+## License
+
+The framework is released under the MIT License (see
+[`LICENSE`](./LICENSE)). By contributing, you agree your work
+ships under those terms.
+
+---
+
+## See also
+
+- [`SPEC.md`](./SPEC.md) — the framework's binding spec. §19.2
+  is the deferred-decisions queue; §20 is the versioning + deploy
+  contract; §21 is the analytics instrumentation contract.
+- [`CHANGELOG.md`](./CHANGELOG.md) — release history in strict
+  descending order. Read recent entries for the shape your PR's
+  release-commit will take.
+- [`PHILOSOPHY.md`](./PHILOSOPHY.md) — what the framework is for.
+  PRs whose shape conflicts with the philosophy get a longer
+  conversation than PRs that fit.
+- [`wiggleverse/ohm-session-history`](https://git.wiggleverse.org/wiggleverse/ohm-session-history)
+  — the authoritative record of how the project has actually
+  evolved, session by session.

DOCS.md

@@ -0,0 +1,605 @@
+# Using the RFC app
+
+This is the user-facing guide to the Wiggleverse RFC framework — how to
+read what's here, propose a new RFC, contribute to one that already
+exists, and understand who is allowed to do what.
+
+This guide describes the framework. Individual deployments brand and
+configure themselves independently — the name in the header and the
+corpus the RFCs are about belong to the deployment, not to this
+document.
+
+For the *why* of the framework, read the [philosophy](/philosophy).
+For the binding technical contract, see `SPEC.md` in the repository.
+
+---
+
+## Reading without signing in
+
+You can read the catalog and every public RFC without an account.
+Anonymous visitors can:
+
+- Browse the catalog of super-drafts and active RFCs.
+- Open any RFC and read its canonical body.
+- Read any public branch — its diff and its chat thread.
+- Read any pull request — its diff, its conversation, its review
+  comments.
+- Read the discussion that has accumulated on an RFC's main view.
+
+Reading is open by design. The framework's claim is that the *argument
+behind a definition* is the evidence that the definition was earned,
+and an argument that disappears behind a sign-in wall stops carrying
+that evidence.
+
+What you cannot do without an account: chat, propose a new RFC,
+create a branch, open a PR, drop a flag, or post on a discussion
+thread. Every write affordance is replaced with a sign-in prompt.
+
+---
+
+## Signing in
+
+While the framework is in private beta, only invited email addresses
+can complete sign-in. If your email is on the allowlist, the
+"Sign in" button in the header completes the flow and lands you on
+the catalog with full read and write access. If your email is not on
+the allowlist, you'll be sent to a short "pending" page explaining
+the gate.
+
+Once you have an account, you're a **contributor** by default — the
+role that grants every write affordance the app exposes, scoped by
+the per-RFC and per-branch rules described below.
+
+---
+
+## Proposing a new RFC
+
+A new RFC begins as a proposal. The "+ Propose new RFC" button at
+the bottom of the catalog opens a small modal that collects four
+things:
+
+- **Title.** The word, concept, or topic this RFC would define.
+- **Slug.** A kebab-cased identifier derived from the title. It is
+  the entry's stable handle from this moment until it graduates;
+  collisions with existing entries or open proposals are caught
+  inline.
+- **Pitch.** One or two paragraphs answering *why this RFC is
+  needed*. This becomes the body of the entry.
+- **Tags.** Optional. The AI suggests tags from the pitch; you can
+  accept, dismiss, or type your own.
+
+Submitting the modal does one concrete thing: it opens a pull
+request against the framework's meta repository, adding one new
+file under `rfcs/`. There is no other Git artifact and no other
+side-effect. You are returned to the **pending-idea view** for the
+new proposal.
+
+A pending idea is publicly readable but not yet a super-draft. The
+catalog surfaces it in a "Pending ideas" disclosure at the bottom
+of the list. A conversation can accumulate on the pending-idea view
+before it is admitted — contributors can argue, in public, about
+whether the entry belongs in the catalog at all.
+
+Three outcomes are possible:
+
+- **Merge.** An admin or owner merges the proposal PR. The entry
+  becomes a super-draft and graduates from the "Pending ideas"
+  section into the main catalog. Any conversation that accumulated
+  on the pending-idea view migrates with it.
+- **Decline.** An admin or owner declines, attaching a written
+  comment. You see the comment on your next visit, along with a
+  one-click affordance to revise and re-propose.
+- **Withdraw.** You can withdraw your own proposal at any time. The
+  entry will not appear in any default view; the conversation that
+  accumulated stays attached to the closed PR as historical record.
+
+You are automatically the first owner of any RFC you propose. The
+claim flow described under [Roles & permissions](#roles--permissions)
+is for *other* contributors to add themselves as owners later, not
+for the proposer.
+
+---
+
+## What a super-draft is
+
+A super-draft is an entry that has been admitted to the catalog but
+does not yet have its own dedicated repository. Most of the
+argument that shapes a definition happens here. The framework
+assumes — and the philosophy explicitly invites — that many
+super-drafts will not survive the argument, and that is fine. The
+entries that do survive earn their place in the catalog by being
+defensible in public.
+
+Opening a super-draft from the catalog gives you the same surface
+an active RFC uses:
+
+- The canonical body in the centre, read-only by default.
+- A chat thread on the right where the public conversation lives.
+- A breadcrumb dropdown listing any in-flight edit branches and
+  any open body-edit PRs against this entry.
+- A "Start Contributing" affordance that cuts a fresh edit branch
+  and lands you in contribute mode.
+
+Edits to a super-draft body propagate through pull requests against
+the meta repository — there is no dedicated RFC repository yet.
+
+---
+
+## What an active RFC is
+
+An active RFC is an entry that has been **graduated**. It has its
+own dedicated repository, an integer `RFC-NNNN` identifier, and a
+canonical body file (`RFC.md`) inside that repository. The catalog
+distinguishes super-drafts and active RFCs at a glance.
+
+Opening an active RFC gives you:
+
+- `main` — the canonical body, always read-only. Changes to `main`
+  arrive exclusively through pull requests.
+- A breadcrumb listing every open branch and pull request on this
+  RFC.
+- A per-branch chat thread on the right. Each branch has its own
+  conversation, including `main` itself.
+- A "Start Contributing" affordance: on `main` it cuts a new branch
+  and lands you on it in contribute mode; on any other branch you
+  already have push access to, it flips that branch into
+  contribute mode.
+
+---
+
+## Discussion vs contribution
+
+The framework draws an explicit distinction between two surfaces
+that other tools tend to conflate:
+
+- **Discussion** is what the RFC is *for*. The chat thread on an
+  RFC's main view is the place for "what about this part?" or
+  "have we considered…?" questions that don't yet warrant proposing
+  a specific edit. Posting on a discussion thread does not create
+  any Git artifact; the conversation lives in the app database.
+- **Contribution** is how an RFC *changes*. Editing the canonical
+  body requires opening a branch and, eventually, a pull request.
+  The pull request is the place a specific proposed change is
+  reviewed and merged.
+
+Reading both surfaces is open to anonymous visitors. Posting on
+either requires a contributor account.
+
+---
+
+## Working on a branch
+
+Contribute mode flips one branch into edit-enabled. The centre
+column splits: a markdown source pane on the left, a live-rendered
+preview on the right. Fenced `mermaid` blocks render as diagrams in
+the preview.
+
+Two kinds of edits accumulate on a branch:
+
+- **AI-proposed changes.** You ask the AI a question or request a
+  revision in the branch's chat. When the AI proposes a concrete
+  edit, that edit appears as a *change card* in a panel below the
+  chat — not yet applied to the document. You can **accept**,
+  **decline**, or **edit before accepting**. Accepting produces
+  one commit on the branch with the original text, the proposed
+  text, and the AI's reason recorded in the commit body.
+- **Manual edits.** Typing directly into the source pane buffers
+  locally and flushes as a single commit on an idle window, a
+  branch switch, or an explicit "Save now" button. Manual edits
+  also appear as change cards in the same panel — same evidence
+  shape, different author.
+
+Every accepted change is one commit. The framework does not
+support squash-merges or fixup-style cleanups: the per-change
+commit granularity is the framework's evidence unit, and
+collapsing it would erase what was earned.
+
+### Discuss mode vs contribute mode
+
+A branch defaults to discuss mode — read-only, with chat enabled.
+AI proposals still appear in chat, but they are *buffered* rather
+than applied; a single CTA invites you to flip the branch into
+contribute mode if you want to act on them. The toggle is an
+*intent* affordance, not a permission one. If you don't have push
+access to the branch, the toggle is disabled with a sign-in or
+request-access path.
+
+`main` is special: contribute mode is never available there. The
+"Start Contributing" button on `main` always cuts a new branch.
+
+### Flags
+
+Anywhere you can read, you can drop a flag. A flag is the
+lightweight "I'm pointing at this, it's a problem" gesture — a
+single short declarative statement anchored to a passage. Creating
+a flag requires a contributor account but does not require push
+access to the branch: any signed-in contributor who can read a
+passage can point at it and say it's wrong.
+
+Flags don't block PR merges by design — making them a merge gate
+would re-create the failure mode where contributors hastily "resolve"
+threads to unblock a button. Flags are prominent on PR headers but
+non-blocking.
+
+### Branch visibility
+
+A new branch is publicly readable by default. The branch creator
+can flip a branch to private, in which case only the creator, any
+explicit grantees, and the RFC's per-RFC owners and arbiters can
+read it. Owners and arbiters can flip it back.
+
+**Opening a PR makes the branch fully public.** If your branch is
+currently private, the "Open PR" affordance asks you to confirm
+this before submitting. There is no concept of a private PR — the
+framework's evidence claim depends on the argument being readable.
+
+### Who can push to a branch
+
+Every branch has one of three contribute modes:
+
+- **`just-me`** (default) — only the branch creator can push.
+- **`specific`** — only the branch creator and explicitly granted
+  contributors can push.
+- **`any-contributor`** — any signed-in contributor can push.
+
+The branch creator and the RFC's per-RFC owners and arbiters can
+change this setting at any time.
+
+### Branch hygiene
+
+A branch with no associated PR auto-closes after 30 days of
+inactivity. A closed branch is deleted from the Git host 60 days
+later. Closed branches remain in the catalog under a "show closed"
+filter — closing is a state, not a censorship event. The chat
+attached to a closed or deleted branch is preserved as historical
+record.
+
+Owners and arbiters can *pin* a branch to disable the auto-close
+timer if the work is paused but legitimately ongoing.
+
+---
+
+## Opening and reviewing a pull request
+
+A pull request is the deliberate "ready for review" gesture for
+work that has accumulated on a branch. The "Open PR" affordance is
+available on any branch with at least one commit ahead of `main`.
+
+The PR creation modal collects two AI-drafted fields, both editable
+before submit:
+
+- **Title.** A one-line description of the change, in spec voice.
+- **Description.** Two to four sentences pulling from the branch
+  chat, written for an arbiter.
+
+There is no reviewer picker. The RFC's arbiters are the implicit
+reviewer set.
+
+### The PR review page
+
+The review page shows the diff, the branch's compressed chat
+(messages that produced accepted changes are expanded, the rest is
+behind a "Show full conversation" toggle), and the review-comment
+surface inline below the chat.
+
+Review comments are not a separate concept from chat — they live in
+the same thread, anchored to a range in the diff. The framework's
+claim is that the disagreement an arbiter raises about a proposed
+change is the same *kind* of thing as the disagreement that
+produced the proposed change in the first place, and the two should
+share a surface.
+
+Each PR records a per-user seen-cursor. New diff hunks and new
+conversation messages since your last visit render with a subtle
+accent. The cursor advances on view; you do not have to mark
+anything as read.
+
+### Merging a PR
+
+Per-RFC owners and arbiters can merge; app-wide admins and owners
+also retain this capability. The merge produces a no-fast-forward
+commit on `main`, preserving every per-acceptance commit as an
+individually reachable node in `main`'s history.
+
+Merge is hard-blocked **only** by Git-level conflicts with `main`.
+Open review threads, pending change-cards, unresolved chat threads,
+and open flags do not block merge by design.
+
+### Conflicts with main
+
+A conflict surfaces on the PR page as a read-only banner. A "Start
+resolution branch" affordance cuts a fresh branch off `main`'s
+current tip, replays the work into it (asking the AI to resolve
+unambiguous conflicts, surfacing the rest for you), and opens a new
+PR. The original PR auto-closes when the resolution PR merges.
+
+Fixup commits on the existing branch are not supported. Per-change
+commit granularity is the framework's evidence unit; admitting
+"fix merge conflict with main" commits would dilute it.
+
+---
+
+## Graduation: super-draft → active RFC
+
+Graduation is the moment a super-draft becomes a canonical entry
+in the catalog. It is initiated by an app-wide admin, an app-wide
+owner, or one of the RFC's per-RFC owners or arbiters from the
+super-draft's page.
+
+Two preconditions block the action:
+
+- **The super-draft must have at least one owner.** The proposer
+  is automatically the first owner; if they have stepped away, any
+  contributor can use the "Claim ownership" affordance to add
+  themselves.
+- **No open body-edit PRs against the super-draft's entry.** An
+  open body-edit PR would attempt to re-introduce a body to a
+  frontmatter-only entry after graduation runs. Merge or withdraw
+  them first.
+
+When the dialog confirms, the framework runs a transactional
+sequence: create a fresh Git repository for the RFC, seed it with
+the super-draft's body as `RFC.md`, update the meta-repo entry to
+`state: active` with the integer ID and the new repository's URL,
+auto-merge that update. If any step fails partway, the sequence
+rolls back — the half-created repository is deleted and the
+unmerged update is abandoned. The dialog shows each step in flight
+and tells you exactly what happened.
+
+The chat thread on the super-draft moves to the new repository's
+`main` chat at graduation. Edit-branch chats from the super-draft
+phase stay attached to their original branches on the meta repo
+and surface from the new RFC view under a "Pre-graduation history"
+section.
+
+Graduation is not reversible. The path forward from an active RFC
+is withdrawal, not back to super-draft.
+
+---
+
+## Withdrawing and reopening
+
+An active RFC or a super-draft can be withdrawn by the proposer
+(for a super-draft they proposed) or by an admin or owner. A
+withdrawn entry stays in the catalog as a historical record but is
+hidden from default views. The entry is filterable back in.
+
+An admin or owner can reopen a withdrawn entry back into the
+super-draft state. The history is preserved across the transition.
+
+---
+
+## AI in the chat
+
+The chat on every RFC, super-draft, branch, and PR has an AI
+participant by default. The framework treats the AI as one voice
+among many in a public argument — not an oracle, and not a
+co-author whose name lands on commits.
+
+You invoke the AI by writing into the chat composer and submitting.
+Each message can pick a model from the picker (the option list is
+configurable per RFC). The AI responds in the chat; when its
+response includes a concrete change to the document, that change
+appears as a card you can accept, decline, or edit.
+
+When you accept an AI's proposed change, the commit's
+`On-behalf-of:` trailer names *you*, not the AI. The AI's authorship
+survives only as evidence — the original proposal in the commit body
+and the message that produced it in the chat record. The framework
+is explicit about this: AI participation produces evidence; it does
+not produce authorship.
+
+Two configuration knobs scope AI participation per RFC:
+
+- **Which models are available.** The meta-repo entry's frontmatter
+  carries an optional `models:` list. Absent means the RFC inherits
+  whatever models the deployment is provisioned to run. An empty
+  list (`models: []`) opts the RFC out of AI entirely — every AI
+  surface is absent rather than disabled-but-present.
+- **Whose credentials pay.** By default the deployment operator's
+  API credentials cover AI calls on every RFC. A `funder:`
+  frontmatter field can name a single contributor whose registered
+  credentials pay for AI calls on this RFC instead. The named
+  contributor must explicitly consent from their settings page;
+  either side can revoke at any time.
+
+Per-RFC AI configuration is edited through the meta-repo PR flow
+that governs the rest of the entry's frontmatter — by the RFC's
+per-RFC owners and arbiters, or by app-wide admins or owners.
+
+---
+
+## Notifications
+
+The framework's public-async work model produces signals that
+shouldn't all reach you the same way. Five surfaces compose:
+
+- **In-app inbox.** The durable triage surface. One mental space
+  across every RFC you have any relationship to, with per-RFC and
+  per-category filters. Reachable from the inbox icon in the
+  header.
+- **Badges.** Ambient pull-ins. A single integer beside the inbox
+  icon (count of unread notifications). A small binary dot on
+  individual catalog rows for watched RFCs with unseen activity.
+  No per-row counts and no per-section counts.
+- **Toasts.** Transient mid-session signals. Used only for your own
+  actions completing, and for events arriving on the view you're
+  currently looking at.
+- **Email.** The single channel that escapes the app. Opt-in per
+  category, conservative defaults. One-click unsubscribe per
+  category.
+- **Digest.** Aggregation for activity on watched RFCs you haven't
+  triaged through any other channel.
+
+### Watch states
+
+Every RFC has one of three implicit relationship states for you:
+
+- **Watching.** You receive structural signals for the RFC.
+- **Following.** You receive only churn-grade signals (new
+  commits, new chat messages on threads you didn't participate
+  in). This is a lighter relationship than watching.
+- **Muted.** You receive no signals for the RFC. The mute is
+  per-RFC and self-imposed; it does not affect what others see
+  or what reaches you on *other* RFCs.
+
+Watch states transition automatically based on your participation,
+with explicit overrides available from each RFC's header and from
+the notification settings page.
+
+### Email categories
+
+Four categories with distinct defaults:
+
+- **Personal-direct events** — default on. Signals where you are
+  the named subject. The contract is that when your name is on the
+  action, the framework reaches out of band.
+- **Watched-RFC structural events** — default off. PR opened on a
+  watched RFC, PR merged, graduation, withdrawal. Inbox and badges
+  carry these by default; the email toggle is opt-in.
+- **Watched-RFC churn** — permanently off, by design. Per-commit
+  and per-message email is intentionally not offered. The digest
+  aggregates this activity weekly.
+- **Admin-actionable events** — default on for admins and owners,
+  unused for contributors.
+
+### Quiet hours
+
+You can set a daily window during which email notifications are
+held. Messages held during the window are released at window end —
+bundled into a single "Activity while you were away" email if a
+threshold accumulated, otherwise sent individually.
+
+---
+
+## Roles & permissions
+
+Authorization in this framework is owned by the app itself, not by
+the Git host. The Git host sees only a single bot account — every
+commit, every PR, every merge passes through it on a user's behalf
+— and the *app* decides which users are authorized to ask the bot
+to do which things.
+
+### The four app-wide roles
+
+Each role is a strict superset of the one below it.
+
+1. **Anonymous.** Anyone who has not signed in. Can read public
+   RFCs, public branches, and public PRs; cannot chat, propose,
+   create branches, or open PRs.
+
+2. **Contributor.** The default role for any authenticated
+   account. Adds everything anonymous can do, plus: propose new
+   RFCs, create branches on any RFC repository, open PRs from
+   branches they have push access to, post on chat anywhere they
+   can read, claim ownership of unclaimed super-drafts.
+
+3. **Admin.** Adds the ability to act on any RFC, anywhere in the
+   framework. Concretely: merge any PR on any RFC, graduate any
+   super-draft, set branch visibility on anyone's behalf, withdraw
+   or reopen any entry, write-mute or restore any contributor,
+   grant or revoke the **admin** role.
+
+4. **Owner.** Adds two capabilities admin does not have: grant or
+   revoke the **owner** role itself, and disable an account
+   entirely. The framework names a single "owner zero" at
+   bootstrap.
+
+The practical difference between admin and owner is narrow but
+load-bearing: admin is the operational tier — it does the day-to-
+day moderation and stewardship work; owner is the tier that
+controls the admin tier. Disabling an account and creating other
+owners are owner-only because they affect the framework's chain of
+authority itself.
+
+The app refuses to let the last owner demote themselves silently —
+losing the last owner would leave nobody able to grant the role
+back. Role changes are recorded in an append-only `permission_events`
+log; an admin's own admin/users page shows the log of who promoted,
+demoted, or muted whom.
+
+### Per-RFC delegated authority
+
+The four roles above are framework-wide. Within an individual RFC,
+the meta-repo entry's frontmatter names two additional groups:
+
+- **`owners:`** — contributors elevated for this RFC. They can
+  grant push access on any branch in the RFC, merge any PR on the
+  RFC, change branch visibility, and withdraw the RFC.
+- **`arbiters:`** — contributors with merge authority for this RFC.
+  Functionally similar to per-RFC owners for merge decisions; the
+  distinction matters in some configuration paths.
+
+Per-RFC owners and arbiters are **not** app-wide admins. Their
+elevated powers are scoped strictly to the RFC named in the
+frontmatter. This is what lets the framework distribute work
+without putting one person on the hook for every action.
+
+The proposer of an RFC is automatically the first per-RFC owner.
+Additional per-RFC owners are added through a "Claim ownership"
+PR against the meta repository; app-wide admins or owners merge
+it.
+
+### Per-branch contribute grants
+
+Within an RFC, the branch creator and the RFC's per-RFC owners
+and arbiters can grant push access to specific contributors on a
+specific branch — `specific` contribute mode, described under
+"Working on a branch."
+
+### The write-mute
+
+An app-wide admin or owner can **mute** a contributor. A muted
+account retains read access and keeps its existing branches, but
+cannot create new branches, open new PRs, propose new RFCs, or
+post chat. This is a moderation tool, distinct from removing the
+account; restoring is the reverse gesture.
+
+The write-mute applies only to contributors. Promoting a user to
+admin or owner is the way to remove a user's write-restriction in
+the structural sense; the write-mute is for *retaining* an account
+while removing its ability to act.
+
+Every mute and every restore is recorded in `permission_events`.
+
+### Three different "mutes"
+
+The word "mute" appears in three structurally distinct places.
+They share a word and nothing else.
+
+- **Write-mute.** Admin-imposed. Removes a contributor's ability
+  to post or push. Described above.
+- **Per-RFC notification mute.** Self-imposed. Sets your watch
+  state on a specific RFC to *muted* — you stop receiving signals
+  for that RFC, in inbox, badges, and email. Does not affect what
+  others see.
+- **Per-user notification mute.** Self-imposed. Suppresses
+  notifications produced by a specific other user, anywhere in
+  the framework. Notification-volume only — it does not affect
+  what you can read.
+
+A write-muted contributor continues to receive notifications
+normally, so they can triage what they can't act on, and so a
+restore lands cleanly.
+
+### Audit trail
+
+Every gesture that changes app state — role changes, mutes,
+graduations, withdrawals, grant changes — is recorded in
+append-only logs the app maintains. Git commit history is for
+code archaeology; the app's audit log is the accountability
+record. An admin's page surfaces both `permission_events` (the
+role/mute log) and `actions` (the state-transition log) for
+review.
+
+---
+
+## Where to learn more
+
+- The framework's *why* lives in [the philosophy
+  document](/philosophy).
+- The binding technical contract — section numbers (`§n.n`)
+  referenced throughout this guide — is in `SPEC.md` in the
+  framework's source repository.
+- Deployment operators have their own recipe in
+  `docs/DEPLOYMENTS.md`.

VERSION

@@ -1 +1 @@
-0.13.0
+0.17.0

backend/.env.example

@@ -92,3 +92,21 @@ OTC_TTL_MINUTES=10
 # loud-failure shape so the abuse path is visible). Set to 0 to
 # disable the cooldown — useful for tests but never in production.
 OTC_REQUEST_COOLDOWN_SECONDS=60
+
+# --- v0.12.0: CloudFlare Turnstile gate on OTC dispatch (§6.2, item #10) ---
+# Provision a Turnstile site at dash.cloudflare.com → Turnstile → Add
+# site. The site key (public) goes in `frontend/.env` as
+# VITE_TURNSTILE_SITE_KEY. The secret key (private) goes here and is
+# what the backend POSTs to /siteverify alongside the user's response
+# token. Leave both unset for dev/test paths; the gate stays open when
+# the secret is absent AND TURNSTILE_REQUIRED=false (the default).
+CLOUDFLARE_TURNSTILE_SECRET=
+
+# When `true`, /auth/otc/request fails closed (HTTP 500 "auth
+# misconfigured") if CLOUDFLARE_TURNSTILE_SECRET is unset. When `false`
+# (the default), a missing secret skips verification — useful in dev
+# and during the pre-rollout window when the operator hasn't wired
+# the secret yet. Flip to `true` once the secret is wired so a future
+# config drift surfaces as a loud 500 rather than a silent abuse-
+# defense disablement.
+TURNSTILE_REQUIRED=false

backend/app/api.py

@@ -22,14 +22,18 @@ from . import (
     api_branches,
     api_discussion,
     api_graduation,
+    api_invitations,
     api_notifications,
     api_prs,
     auth,
     db,
+    device_trust as device_trust_mod,
+    docs as docs_mod,
     entry as entry_mod,
     cache,
     funder,
     health,
+    notify,
     philosophy,
     providers as providers_mod,
 )
@@ -55,6 +59,17 @@ class FunderCredentialBody(BaseModel):
     api_key: str = Field(min_length=1, max_length=2048)
 
 
+class BetaRequestBody(BaseModel):
+    # v0.8.0 — captured on the first OTC sign-in. All three fields are
+    # required so the admin queue has a coherent triage shape.
+    # The bounds match the v0.7.0 OTC body (320 chars for email-ish
+    # headers; 4000 for the free-text reason — the same upper bound
+    # DeclineBody uses elsewhere in this file).
+    first_name: str = Field(min_length=1, max_length=120)
+    last_name: str = Field(min_length=1, max_length=120)
+    beta_request_reason: str = Field(min_length=1, max_length=4000)
+
+
 def make_router(
     config: Config,
     gitea: Gitea,
@@ -88,6 +103,12 @@ def make_router(
     # Contribution still requires a PR (api_prs above); this surface
     # is for discussion that does not yet warrant a branch.
     router.include_router(api_discussion.make_router())
+    # v0.16.0 (roadmap item #12): owner-only invite for per-RFC
+    # contribution + discussion. The RFC's owner can invite specific
+    # users by email to either open PRs or join the discussion; non-
+    # invited users keep read access but cannot write (v0.6.0
+    # contract extended to per-RFC scope).
+    router.include_router(api_invitations.make_router())
 
     # ---------------------------------------------------------------
     # §17: /api/health — unauthenticated post-flight probe.
@@ -111,6 +132,17 @@ def make_router(
         payload = philosophy.load()
         return {"body": payload["body"]}
 
+    # ---------------------------------------------------------------
+    # /api/docs — DOCS.md served verbatim. Sibling of /api/philosophy:
+    # no auth gate, same disk-first load + cache shape, same intent —
+    # public read surface for a markdown file checked into the repo.
+    # ---------------------------------------------------------------
+
+    @router.get("/api/docs")
+    async def get_docs() -> dict[str, Any]:
+        payload = docs_mod.load()
+        return {"body": payload["body"]}
+
     # ---------------------------------------------------------------
     # Auth surface — reads role from our users table per §6.
     # ---------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -120,6 +152,29 @@ def make_router(
         user = auth.current_user(request)
         if user is None:
             return {"authenticated": False, "user": None}
+        # v0.8.0 + v0.10.0: single round-trip for everything the
+        # frontend gates UI off of — beta-access state + passcode state.
+        row = db.conn().execute(
+            "SELECT first_name, last_name, beta_request_reason, "
+            "passcode_hash, passcode_set_at "
+            "FROM users WHERE id = ?",
+            (user.user_id,),
+        ).fetchone()
+        first_name = (row["first_name"] if row else None) or ""
+        last_name = (row["last_name"] if row else None) or ""
+        beta_request_reason = (row["beta_request_reason"] if row else None) or ""
+        # "Needs profile" iff the user is pending AND hasn't yet
+        # filed their beta-request capture. Granted users never see
+        # the capture prompt; pending users who already filed see
+        # the /beta-pending page without the capture form.
+        needs_profile = (
+            user.permission_state == "pending"
+            and not first_name
+            and not last_name
+            and not beta_request_reason
+        )
+        has_passcode = bool(row and row["passcode_hash"])
+        passcode_set_at = row["passcode_set_at"] if (row and has_passcode) else None
         return {
             "authenticated": True,
             "user": {
@@ -129,9 +184,144 @@ def make_router(
                 "email": user.email,
                 "avatar_url": user.avatar_url,
                 "role": user.role,
+                "permission_state": user.permission_state,
+                "first_name": first_name,
+                "last_name": last_name,
+                "beta_request_reason": beta_request_reason,
+                "needs_profile": needs_profile,
+                "has_passcode": has_passcode,
+                "passcode_set_at": passcode_set_at,
             },
         }
 
+    # ---------------------------------------------------------------
+    # v0.8.0: /api/auth/me/beta-request — first-OTC profile capture
+    # (roadmap item #6). Lands first name, last name, and the free-
+    # text "why I should be included in the beta" on the signed-in
+    # user's row. Idempotent for the same already-pending user;
+    # refuses to overwrite a row that's already granted (so a
+    # bored already-granted user can't accidentally re-submit the
+    # form and clobber the admin's audit trail). Uses
+    # `require_user` rather than `require_contributor` because
+    # `require_contributor` already enforces `permission_state =
+    # 'granted'` and would refuse a pending user; the whole point
+    # of this endpoint is to register the request _from_ a pending
+    # user.
+    # ---------------------------------------------------------------
+
+    @router.post("/api/auth/me/beta-request")
+    async def submit_beta_request(body: BetaRequestBody, request: Request) -> dict[str, Any]:
+        user = auth.require_user(request)
+        row = db.conn().execute(
+            "SELECT permission_state, first_name, last_name, beta_request_reason FROM users WHERE id = ?",
+            (user.user_id,),
+        ).fetchone()
+        if row is None:
+            # Defensive — the session pointed at a deleted row.
+            raise HTTPException(404, "User not found")
+        # Granted users have no business filing a beta request.
+        # 'revoked' likewise — the request flow is for fresh users
+        # only. Both shapes refuse with 409 (conflict) so the client
+        # can distinguish "you already have access" from
+        # "your access was revoked".
+        if row["permission_state"] == "granted":
+            raise HTTPException(409, "Your account is already granted access")
+        if row["permission_state"] == "revoked":
+            raise HTTPException(409, "Your account's access has been revoked")
+        # Re-submission from a pending user updates the row — the
+        # admin sees the latest text rather than a stale draft.
+        # The state stays 'pending'; only an admin can flip it.
+        db.conn().execute(
+            """
+            UPDATE users
+               SET first_name = ?,
+                   last_name = ?,
+                   beta_request_reason = ?
+             WHERE id = ?
+            """,
+            (
+                body.first_name.strip(),
+                body.last_name.strip(),
+                body.beta_request_reason.strip(),
+                user.user_id,
+            ),
+        )
+        # v0.9.0 (roadmap item #7): notify every admin/owner of the
+        # fresh request. Only the first submission is the
+        # "newly-pending" gesture — re-submits from the same user
+        # would otherwise carpet the admin inbox. We fire only when
+        # this is the row's first time getting all three fields
+        # populated (the prior row carried at least one NULL).
+        prior = row  # captured before the UPDATE above
+        was_already_complete = bool(
+            prior["first_name"] and prior["last_name"] and prior["beta_request_reason"]
+        )
+        if not was_already_complete:
+            notify.fan_out_new_beta_request(requester_user_id=user.user_id)
+        return {"ok": True}
+
+    # ---------------------------------------------------------------
+    # v0.11.0: trust device for 30 days (§6.2, roadmap item #9).
+    #
+    # The mint path lives on the OAuth router (issuing the cookie is
+    # coupled to OTC/passcode verify). This module owns the read/revoke
+    # surface the /settings/devices page calls.
+    # ---------------------------------------------------------------
+
+    @router.get("/api/auth/me/devices")
+    async def list_my_devices(request: Request) -> dict[str, Any]:
+        """Active device-trust rows for the signed-in user.
+
+        Active = not revoked, not expired. The current request's
+        device (if any) is *not* singled out here — the surface
+        shows the same row shape for every device so the user can
+        revoke any of them without the page leaking which row
+        carries the cookie they're using right now.
+        """
+        user = auth.require_user(request)
+        rows = device_trust_mod.list_for_user(user.user_id)
+        return {
+            "items": [
+                {
+                    "id": r.id,
+                    "created_at": r.created_at,
+                    "expires_at": r.expires_at,
+                    "last_seen_at": r.last_seen_at,
+                    "user_agent": r.user_agent,
+                }
+                for r in rows
+            ]
+        }
+
+    @router.delete("/api/auth/me/devices/{device_id}")
+    async def revoke_my_device(device_id: int, request: Request) -> dict[str, Any]:
+        """Revoke a single device-trust row for the signed-in user.
+
+        The user-id scope is enforced in SQL so a hostile client
+        cannot revoke another user's row by guessing ids. A row that
+        doesn't exist, doesn't belong to this user, or is already
+        revoked reads as 404 — the wrong-vs-already-revoked
+        distinction would only help a probing client enumerate ids.
+        """
+        user = auth.require_user(request)
+        ok = device_trust_mod.revoke(user.user_id, device_id)
+        if not ok:
+            raise HTTPException(404, "Device not found")
+        return {"ok": True}
+
+    @router.delete("/api/auth/me/devices")
+    async def revoke_all_my_devices(request: Request) -> dict[str, Any]:
+        """Revoke every active device-trust row for the signed-in user.
+
+        The user's current request stays authenticated via its
+        session cookie; the device-trust cookie carried on the
+        current device is also revoked, but `rfc_session` keeps the
+        request flow alive until sign-out / expiry.
+        """
+        user = auth.require_user(request)
+        count = device_trust_mod.revoke_all(user.user_id)
+        return {"ok": True, "revoked": count}
+
     # ---------------------------------------------------------------
     # §7: the catalog
     # ---------------------------------------------------------------

backend/app/api_admin.py

@@ -11,6 +11,8 @@ The endpoints in this module:
   - `GET  /api/admin/users`                       — list users with role + mute
   - `POST /api/admin/users/<id>/role`             — set role per §6.1
   - `POST /api/admin/users/<id>/mute`             — set the §6.2 write-mute
+  - `POST /api/admin/users`                       — v0.17.0: create user + invite
+  - `GET  /api/admin/users/invites`               — v0.17.0: pending invites
   - `GET  /api/admin/audit`                       — paged `actions` log
   - `GET  /api/admin/permission-events`           — paged `permission_events` log
   - `GET  /api/admin/graduation-queue`            — super-drafts ready to graduate
@@ -33,8 +35,9 @@ from typing import Any
 from fastapi import APIRouter, HTTPException, Query, Request
 from pydantic import BaseModel, Field
 
-from . import auth, db
+from . import auth, db, email_invite, invites
 from .config import Config
+from .email import EmailConfig
 
 
 # ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -50,11 +53,47 @@ class MuteBody(BaseModel):
     muted: bool
 
 
+class PermissionStateBody(BaseModel):
+    # v0.9.0: the admin flip from the user-management page (roadmap
+    # item #7). `pending` is not surfaceable from the admin UI —
+    # only the OTC verify path lands a row in `pending` — but we
+    # accept it in the pattern in case a future restore-to-queue
+    # gesture wants to re-pend a granted user; today the UI only
+    # exposes `granted` and `revoked`.
+    state: str = Field(pattern="^(pending|granted|revoked)$")
+
+
 class AllowlistAddBody(BaseModel):
     email: str = Field(min_length=3, max_length=320)
     note: str | None = Field(default=None, max_length=200)
 
 
+class CreateUserInviteBody(BaseModel):
+    """v0.17.0 / roadmap item #16 — admin-create user + invite email.
+
+    The admin types these fields on the "Create user + invite" modal on
+    `/admin/users`. The email + role are required; first/last name and
+    the optional custom message round out the body.
+
+    Bounds mirror the rest of the codebase:
+      * `email`: 320 chars — RFC 5321 envelope limit, same as
+        `OtcRequestBody` / `BetaRequestBody` / `AllowlistAddBody`.
+      * `first_name` / `last_name`: 120 chars — same as the v0.8.0
+        `BetaRequestBody` capture form.
+      * `role`: pydantic regex pinned to the §6.1 set so an unknown
+        role fails at the body bound (422) instead of landing as a
+        CHECK constraint violation in the migration.
+      * `custom_message`: 500 chars — the brief calls this out as
+        the max. The frontend modal shows a "remaining chars"
+        counter to match.
+    """
+    email: str = Field(min_length=3, max_length=320)
+    first_name: str = Field(default="", max_length=120)
+    last_name: str = Field(default="", max_length=120)
+    role: str = Field(pattern="^(owner|admin|contributor)$")
+    custom_message: str = Field(default="", max_length=500)
+
+
 # ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 # Router
 # ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -68,15 +107,110 @@ def make_router(config: Config) -> APIRouter:
 
     @router.get("/api/admin/users")
     async def list_users(request: Request) -> dict[str, Any]:
+        """v0.9.0: the user-management surface (roadmap item #7).
+
+        The listing carries every column the admin queue needs to triage
+        pending beta-access requests alongside the existing role/mute
+        affordances. Sort order surfaces pending requests first (so the
+        admin lands on the inbox shape), then granted, then revoked;
+        within a state, ownership/role and recency are the tiebreakers
+        so the legacy ordering (owner first, then admin, then by name)
+        is preserved inside the granted bucket.
+
+        `permission_decided_by_login` joins the deciding admin row so
+        the UI can render "granted by @ben" without a second round-trip.
+
+        v0.16.0 (roadmap item #12) additive: each user row now carries
+        an `rfc_invitations` array — the per-RFC invitations the user
+        has accepted. This is the "permission-grant requests from
+        invited users" hook the roadmap text calls for: when a user
+        accepts a per-RFC invite and they're not yet platform-granted,
+        the admin sees "here because @ben invited them to <RFC> as
+        <role>" alongside their pending row, informing (not deciding)
+        the platform grant. The two write surfaces remain distinct —
+        the RFC's owner controls per-RFC roles; the admin controls
+        platform-grant state.
+        """
         auth.require_admin(request)
         rows = db.conn().execute(
             """
-            SELECT id, gitea_login, display_name, email, role, muted,
-                   created_at, last_seen_at
-              FROM users
-             ORDER BY role = 'owner' DESC, role = 'admin' DESC, display_name COLLATE NOCASE
+            SELECT u.id, u.gitea_login, u.display_name, u.email, u.role, u.muted,
+                   u.created_at, u.last_seen_at,
+                   u.permission_state, u.first_name, u.last_name,
+                   u.beta_request_reason,
+                   u.permission_decided_by, u.permission_decided_at,
+                   d.gitea_login AS decided_by_login,
+                   d.display_name AS decided_by_display
+              FROM users u
+         LEFT JOIN users d ON d.id = u.permission_decided_by
+             ORDER BY
+                CASE u.permission_state
+                  WHEN 'pending' THEN 0
+                  WHEN 'granted' THEN 1
+                  WHEN 'revoked' THEN 2
+                  ELSE 3
+                END,
+                u.role = 'owner' DESC, u.role = 'admin' DESC,
+                COALESCE(u.last_seen_at, u.created_at) DESC,
+                u.display_name COLLATE NOCASE
             """
         ).fetchall()
+        # v0.16.0 — per-user accepted per-RFC invitations. One query
+        # over the full set, indexed bucket-by-user-id in Python so
+        # the per-row attachment below is O(1). Empty array for users
+        # who hold no accepted invitations.
+        invitation_rows = db.conn().execute(
+            """
+            SELECT c.user_id, c.rfc_slug, c.role_in_rfc, c.created_at,
+                   r.title AS rfc_title,
+                   i.id AS invitation_id, i.invitee_email,
+                   ui.gitea_login AS inviter_login,
+                   ui.display_name AS inviter_display
+              FROM rfc_collaborators c
+         LEFT JOIN cached_rfcs r ON r.slug = c.rfc_slug
+         LEFT JOIN rfc_invitations i ON i.id = c.invitation_id
+         LEFT JOIN users ui ON ui.id = i.inviter_user_id
+             ORDER BY c.created_at DESC
+            """
+        ).fetchall()
+        per_user_invites: dict[int, list[dict]] = {}
+        for ir in invitation_rows:
+            per_user_invites.setdefault(ir["user_id"], []).append({
+                "rfc_slug": ir["rfc_slug"],
+                "rfc_title": ir["rfc_title"] or ir["rfc_slug"],
+                "role_in_rfc": ir["role_in_rfc"],
+                "invited_at": ir["created_at"],
+                "invitation_id": ir["invitation_id"],
+                "invitee_email": ir["invitee_email"],
+                "inviter_login": ir["inviter_login"],
+                "inviter_display": ir["inviter_display"],
+            })
+        # v0.17.0 / roadmap item #16: a user row whose `last_seen_at`
+        # is NULL is one of two things — a brand-new row that was just
+        # provisioned (rare, and the v0.7.0 OTC verify path stamps
+        # last_seen_at on the same call that creates the row), or an
+        # admin-created invite-pending row (v0.17.0 — created by
+        # `POST /api/admin/users`). We surface a `pending_invite_id`
+        # field by joining through `user_invite_tokens` so the
+        # Users tab can render a "(pending invite)" badge alongside
+        # the role/state controls. Filters to invites that are
+        # neither expired nor claimed — once the invitee clicks
+        # through, the badge clears (and `last_seen_at` populates).
+        pending_invite_rows = db.conn().execute(
+            """
+            SELECT invited_user_id, id AS invite_id, expires_at
+              FROM user_invite_tokens
+             WHERE claimed_at IS NULL
+               AND datetime(expires_at) > datetime('now')
+            """
+        ).fetchall()
+        pending_invites = {
+            r["invited_user_id"]: {
+                "invite_id": r["invite_id"],
+                "expires_at": r["expires_at"],
+            }
+            for r in pending_invite_rows
+        }
         return {
             "items": [
                 {
@@ -88,6 +222,224 @@ def make_router(config: Config) -> APIRouter:
                     "muted": bool(r["muted"]),
                     "created_at": r["created_at"],
                     "last_seen_at": r["last_seen_at"],
+                    "permission_state": r["permission_state"] or "granted",
+                    "first_name": r["first_name"] or "",
+                    "last_name": r["last_name"] or "",
+                    "beta_request_reason": r["beta_request_reason"] or "",
+                    "permission_decided_at": r["permission_decided_at"],
+                    "permission_decided_by_login": r["decided_by_login"],
+                    "permission_decided_by_display": r["decided_by_display"],
+                    # v0.16.0 additive — never null, always an array.
+                    "rfc_invitations": per_user_invites.get(r["id"], []),
+                    # v0.17.0: present iff the row is invited-but-not-
+                    # claimed-yet. The frontend renders a "(pending
+                    # invite)" badge when this is non-null.
+                    "pending_invite": pending_invites.get(r["id"]),
+                }
+                for r in rows
+            ]
+        }
+
+    # ----- Create user + invite (v0.17.0 / roadmap item #16) -----
+
+    @router.post("/api/admin/users")
+    async def create_user_with_invite(
+        body: CreateUserInviteBody, request: Request,
+    ) -> dict[str, Any]:
+        """Provision a fresh `users` row with a pre-assigned role + send
+        an invite email carrying a claim link.
+
+        Refusals:
+          * `422` — the admin tries to invite their own email (no
+            self-invite; symmetric to `set_permission`'s self-flip
+            refusal and `set_role`'s self-downgrade refusal). Use
+            the existing role-change channel for self-edits.
+          * `422` — the admin tries to grant `owner` without being
+            owner themselves. §6.1: owner-zero is the only owner
+            bootstrap path; new owners come from a sitting owner's
+            hand. A 422 here matches the message shape; a 403 would
+            also be defensible, but staying with 422 keeps the
+            "your input is bad" framing.
+          * `409` — the email already maps to a `users` row. The
+            admin should use the existing role / grant gestures on
+            the existing user, not create a duplicate.
+          * `422` — pydantic-level: malformed email, role outside
+            the §6.1 set, custom_message over 500 chars.
+
+        On success:
+          1. The invitee `users` row lands with the chosen role and
+             `permission_state='granted'` (admin's hand is the grant)
+             and `last_seen_at IS NULL` (the "(pending invite)"
+             discriminator the listing surface joins through).
+          2. The `user_invite_tokens` row lands with the bcrypt-
+             hashed opaque token; the raw token rides only in the
+             email link.
+          3. The invite email dispatches with subject "You're
+             invited to <app> by <admin>" and the custom message
+             embedded in a clearly-delimited block if present.
+          4. A `permission_events` row records the admin-create
+             gesture so the §6.5 / `permissions` admin tab carries
+             the audit trail alongside the existing grant/revoke
+             flips.
+        """
+        viewer = auth.require_admin(request)
+        email_clean = body.email.strip().lower()
+        if "@" not in email_clean or len(email_clean.split("@")[-1]) < 2:
+            raise HTTPException(422, "Email looks malformed")
+
+        # Self-invite refusal. Compare the admin's own email
+        # case-insensitively against the invite target.
+        viewer_row = db.conn().execute(
+            "SELECT email FROM users WHERE id = ?", (viewer.user_id,)
+        ).fetchone()
+        viewer_email = (viewer_row["email"] or "").strip().lower() if viewer_row else ""
+        if viewer_email and viewer_email == email_clean:
+            raise HTTPException(
+                422,
+                "You cannot invite yourself — use the role-change channel "
+                "if you need to edit your own row",
+            )
+
+        # Owner-grant refusal: §6.1 says only a sitting owner can mint
+        # a new owner. An admin trying to invite-as-owner is refused
+        # at 422; the admin should ask the owner to issue the invite,
+        # or invite as `admin` and let the owner promote later.
+        if body.role == "owner" and viewer.role != "owner":
+            raise HTTPException(
+                422,
+                "Only an owner can invite a new owner — invite as admin and "
+                "ask the owner to promote, or have the owner issue this invite",
+            )
+
+        # Duplicate-email refusal. A pre-existing row (regardless of
+        # permission_state) means the admin should use the existing
+        # role / grant gestures, not create a parallel user.
+        existing = db.conn().execute(
+            "SELECT id FROM users WHERE email = ? COLLATE NOCASE LIMIT 1",
+            (email_clean,),
+        ).fetchone()
+        if existing is not None:
+            raise HTTPException(409, "A user with this email already exists")
+
+        # Create the invitee row + token row + send the email.
+        outcome = invites.create_invite(
+            email=email_clean,
+            first_name=body.first_name,
+            last_name=body.last_name,
+            role=body.role,
+            custom_message=body.custom_message,
+            created_by_admin_id=viewer.user_id,
+        )
+
+        # Audit row in permission_events so the admin Permissions tab
+        # carries the gesture. The before-state is "n/a" (the row
+        # did not exist); the after-state is the granted role. We
+        # use a new `event_kind='user_invited'` so the existing
+        # grant/revoke kinds stay scoped to their flip surface.
+        db.conn().execute(
+            """
+            INSERT INTO permission_events
+                (actor_user_id, subject_user_id, event_kind, details)
+            VALUES (?, ?, 'user_invited', ?)
+            """,
+            (
+                viewer.user_id,
+                outcome.invited_user_id,
+                json.dumps({
+                    "email": email_clean,
+                    "role": body.role,
+                    "invite_id": outcome.invite_id,
+                    "custom_message_chars": len(body.custom_message or ""),
+                }),
+            ),
+        )
+
+        # Build the claim URL using the same APP_URL the email module
+        # reads. The token rides as a query-string param to the
+        # frontend route `/invites/claim?token=…`; the frontend POSTs
+        # it back to `/api/invites/claim` which consumes the row.
+        cfg = EmailConfig.from_env()
+        from urllib.parse import urlencode
+        claim_url = f"{cfg.app_url}/invites/claim?{urlencode({'token': outcome.raw_token})}"
+
+        # Fetch the inviter display so the email body can render
+        # "Ben Stull (ben@example.com) has invited you to …". We
+        # read off the row fresh rather than trusting the session
+        # cookie's cached display_name.
+        inviter_row = db.conn().execute(
+            "SELECT display_name, email FROM users WHERE id = ?",
+            (viewer.user_id,),
+        ).fetchone()
+        inviter_display = (
+            (inviter_row["display_name"] if inviter_row else "") or viewer.display_name or "An admin"
+        )
+        inviter_email_for_body = (inviter_row["email"] if inviter_row else "") or viewer.email or ""
+
+        email_invite.send_invite_email(
+            to_address=email_clean,
+            claim_url=claim_url,
+            inviter_display=inviter_display,
+            inviter_email=inviter_email_for_body,
+            custom_message=body.custom_message,
+        )
+
+        return {
+            "ok": True,
+            "invite_id": outcome.invite_id,
+            "invited_user_id": outcome.invited_user_id,
+            "email": email_clean,
+            "role": body.role,
+        }
+
+    @router.get("/api/admin/users/invites")
+    async def list_user_invites(request: Request) -> dict[str, Any]:
+        """List active (not claimed, not expired) admin-issued invites.
+
+        Powers the admin's "I sent these but they haven't been claimed
+        yet" view. The frontend uses this alongside `list_users` —
+        the user-listing's `pending_invite` field carries the per-row
+        flag; this endpoint carries the full invite shape for a
+        dedicated drill-in surface.
+        """
+        auth.require_admin(request)
+        rows = invites.list_pending_invites()
+        # Join through to the admin display names so the surface can
+        # render "invited by @ben" without a second client call.
+        admin_ids = {r.created_by_admin_id for r in rows}
+        admin_lookup: dict[int, dict[str, str]] = {}
+        if admin_ids:
+            placeholders = ",".join("?" * len(admin_ids))
+            admin_rows = db.conn().execute(
+                f"SELECT id, gitea_login, display_name FROM users "
+                f"WHERE id IN ({placeholders})",
+                tuple(admin_ids),
+            ).fetchall()
+            admin_lookup = {
+                ar["id"]: {
+                    "gitea_login": ar["gitea_login"] or "",
+                    "display_name": ar["display_name"] or "",
+                }
+                for ar in admin_rows
+            }
+        return {
+            "items": [
+                {
+                    "id": r.id,
+                    "email": r.email,
+                    "role": r.role,
+                    "first_name": r.first_name,
+                    "last_name": r.last_name,
+                    "custom_message": r.custom_message,
+                    "created_at": r.created_at,
+                    "expires_at": r.expires_at,
+                    "invited_user_id": r.invited_user_id,
+                    "created_by_admin_id": r.created_by_admin_id,
+                    "created_by_login": admin_lookup.get(
+                        r.created_by_admin_id, {}
+                    ).get("gitea_login", ""),
+                    "created_by_display": admin_lookup.get(
+                        r.created_by_admin_id, {}
+                    ).get("display_name", ""),
                 }
                 for r in rows
             ]
@@ -136,6 +488,74 @@ def make_router(config: Config) -> APIRouter:
         )
         return {"ok": True, "role": body.role, "changed": True}
 
+    # ----- Permission state (§6.1, v0.9.0 roadmap item #7) -----
+
+    @router.post("/api/admin/users/{user_id}/permission")
+    async def set_permission(user_id: int, body: PermissionStateBody, request: Request) -> dict[str, Any]:
+        """Flip a user's `permission_state` between pending/granted/revoked.
+
+        v0.8.0 wired the column shape but shipped no admin UI for it —
+        the grant gesture was a manual `UPDATE users` against the DB.
+        v0.9.0 (roadmap item #7) lands the admin user-management page;
+        this endpoint is its single write surface.
+
+        Audit shape: every flip writes a `permission_events` row with
+        event_kind in {'permission_granted', 'permission_revoked',
+        'permission_repended'} so §6.5's log carries the change. The
+        `permission_decided_by` / `permission_decided_at` columns on
+        the user row are co-stamped so the user listing can render
+        "granted by @ben at <date>" without a second join through
+        the audit table.
+
+        Refuses with 422 if the admin tries to flip their own row
+        (no self-grant / self-revoke; symmetric to set_mute's
+        self-mute refusal and set_role's self-downgrade refusal).
+        """
+        viewer = auth.require_admin(request)
+        target = db.conn().execute(
+            "SELECT id, role, permission_state FROM users WHERE id = ?",
+            (user_id,),
+        ).fetchone()
+        if target is None:
+            raise HTTPException(404, "User not found")
+        if target["id"] == viewer.user_id:
+            raise HTTPException(422, "You cannot change your own permission state")
+
+        before = target["permission_state"] or "granted"
+        after = body.state
+        if before == after:
+            return {"ok": True, "permission_state": after, "changed": False}
+
+        db.conn().execute(
+            """
+            UPDATE users
+               SET permission_state = ?,
+                   permission_decided_by = ?,
+                   permission_decided_at = datetime('now')
+             WHERE id = ?
+            """,
+            (after, viewer.user_id, user_id),
+        )
+        event_kind = {
+            "granted": "permission_granted",
+            "revoked": "permission_revoked",
+            "pending": "permission_repended",
+        }[after]
+        db.conn().execute(
+            """
+            INSERT INTO permission_events
+                (actor_user_id, subject_user_id, event_kind, details)
+            VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?)
+            """,
+            (
+                viewer.user_id,
+                user_id,
+                event_kind,
+                json.dumps({"before": before, "after": after}),
+            ),
+        )
+        return {"ok": True, "permission_state": after, "changed": True}
+
     # ----- Write-mute (§6.2) -----
 
     @router.post("/api/admin/users/{user_id}/mute")

backend/app/api_branches.py

@@ -279,6 +279,15 @@ def make_router(
     @router.post("/api/rfcs/{slug}/branches/main/promote-to-branch")
     async def promote_to_branch(slug: str, body: PromoteToBranchBody, request: Request) -> dict[str, Any]:
         viewer = auth.require_contributor(request)
+        # v0.16.0 (item #12): cutting a contribute branch is the
+        # PR-shaped write surface gate. A platform-granted user who is
+        # not invited as a per-RFC contributor cannot start work that
+        # only exists to land in a PR.
+        if not auth.can_contribute_to_rfc(viewer, slug):
+            raise HTTPException(
+                403,
+                "This RFC's owner has not invited you to contribute PRs",
+            )
         rfc = _require_active_rfc(slug)
         owner, repo = _repo_for(rfc)
         new_branch = (body.branch_name or "").strip()
@@ -331,6 +340,14 @@ def make_router(
     @router.post("/api/rfcs/{slug}/start-edit-branch")
     async def start_edit_branch(slug: str, body: StartEditBranchBody, request: Request) -> dict[str, Any]:
         viewer = auth.require_contributor(request)
+        # v0.16.0 (item #12): same per-RFC contribute gate as
+        # promote-to-branch — kicking off a super-draft edit branch is
+        # also PR-shaped work.
+        if not auth.can_contribute_to_rfc(viewer, slug):
+            raise HTTPException(
+                403,
+                "This RFC's owner has not invited you to contribute PRs",
+            )
         rfc = _require_super_draft(slug)
         owner, repo = _repo_for(rfc)
         new_branch = (body.branch_name or "").strip()

backend/app/api_discussion.py

@@ -116,6 +116,17 @@ def make_router() -> APIRouter:
     ) -> dict[str, Any]:
         viewer = auth.require_contributor(request)
         _require_rfc_readable(slug)
+        # v0.16.0 (roadmap item #12): the per-RFC discussion is now a
+        # gated surface. The platform-level `require_contributor` above
+        # ensures the user is signed in + admin-granted; this layer
+        # narrows further to "is this user named for this RFC?" The
+        # 403 here is structurally the v0.6.0 anon-write refusal
+        # extended to non-invited platform users.
+        if not auth.can_discuss_rfc(viewer, slug):
+            raise HTTPException(
+                403,
+                "This RFC's owner has not invited you to its discussion",
+            )
         cur = db.conn().execute(
             """
             INSERT INTO threads
@@ -175,6 +186,12 @@ def make_router() -> APIRouter:
     ) -> dict[str, Any]:
         viewer = auth.require_contributor(request)
         _require_rfc_readable(slug)
+        # v0.16.0 (item #12): same per-RFC gate as create_discussion_thread.
+        if not auth.can_discuss_rfc(viewer, slug):
+            raise HTTPException(
+                403,
+                "This RFC's owner has not invited you to its discussion",
+            )
         _require_discussion_thread(slug, thread_id)
         message_id = chat_layer.append_user_message(
             thread_id=thread_id,

backend/app/api_invitations.py

@@ -0,0 +1,575 @@
+"""v0.16.0 / §6 / §10 — owner-only invite for per-RFC PR or PR-less
+discussion (roadmap item #12).
+
+The RFC's owner can invite a specific email to one of two per-RFC roles:
+
+  * `contributor` — may open PRs against this RFC AND post in its
+    discussion (PR-permission strictly includes discussion-permission).
+  * `discussant` — may post in this RFC's PR-less discussion only.
+
+Non-invited users keep the v0.6.0 anonymous-read contract: they can
+read but cannot write/discuss the RFC. Reads are not narrowed by
+this item.
+
+Endpoints:
+
+  * `POST   /api/rfcs/{slug}/invitations`              — owner: create + email
+  * `GET    /api/rfcs/{slug}/invitations`              — owner: list pending/accepted
+  * `POST   /api/rfcs/{slug}/invitations/{id}/revoke`  — owner: revoke
+  * `GET    /api/invitations/accept`                   — token lookup (signed-in user)
+  * `POST   /api/invitations/accept`                   — token redeem (signed-in user)
+
+The accept endpoints are deliberately platform-scoped (not nested under
+the RFC slug) because the user clicking the email link only has the
+token and may not even know the slug yet. The GET shape lets the
+frontend show a confirmation page ("RFC <X> invited you to be a
+<role> — accept?") before the POST commits the membership.
+
+Permission gates (composed with `require_contributor`):
+
+  * Issue / list / revoke: `auth.can_invite_to_rfc` — RFC owner or
+    platform admin/owner.
+  * Accept: any platform-granted signed-in user; the gate is the
+    token, not the role. The token also constrains which email the
+    accept lands under — the accepting user's email must match the
+    invitation's invitee_email (case-insensitive). This prevents an
+    invited-but-not-the-account-holder situation from minting a
+    collaborator row under the wrong identity.
+
+Email shape: a single plain-text body sent via the existing SMTP path
+(reuses `EmailConfig.from_env()` like `email_otc.py` does). No
+unsubscribe footer — the email is transactional and per-invite, not a
+recurring notification. No tracking pixel.
+
+Admin-page hook: when an accept lands and the user's
+`permission_state` is still `pending`, that signals to the admin's
+`/admin/users` queue that the user is here because they accepted a
+per-RFC invitation — informing (not deciding) the admin's
+platform-grant call. v0.16.0 surfaces this via additive columns on
+the existing `GET /api/admin/users` listing (see `api_admin.py`'s
+diff in the same release) — no new endpoint, no restructure.
+"""
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import logging
+import secrets
+import smtplib
+from email.message import EmailMessage
+from email.utils import formataddr
+from typing import Any
+
+from fastapi import APIRouter, HTTPException, Request
+from pydantic import BaseModel, Field
+
+from . import auth, db
+from .email import EmailConfig, _SENT
+
+log = logging.getLogger(__name__)
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Pydantic bodies
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+class CreateInvitationBody(BaseModel):
+    """The owner picks an email and a role-in-RFC. No custom-message
+    field — that belongs to item #16's platform-level invite surface,
+    not here.
+
+    We validate the email with a deliberately narrow pattern rather
+    than `pydantic.EmailStr` to avoid pulling in `email-validator` as
+    a dependency (and v0.7.0's OTC body does the same — see
+    `OTCRequestBody`'s shape). The validation here is intentionally
+    permissive: a local-part, an `@`, and a domain part with no
+    whitespace. Operator-side typo catching is the job of the email
+    transport; the framework only guards against obviously malformed
+    input."""
+    invitee_email: str = Field(min_length=3, max_length=320,
+                               pattern=r"^[^\s@]+@[^\s@]+$")
+    role_in_rfc: str = Field(pattern="^(contributor|discussant)$")
+
+
+class AcceptInvitationBody(BaseModel):
+    token: str = Field(min_length=1, max_length=200)
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Constants
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+# 30-day TTL matches the device-trust window the framework already
+# ships (v0.11.0). A pending invitation past this is rejected at the
+# accept endpoint regardless of the row's `status` column.
+INVITATION_TTL_DAYS = 30
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Router
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+def make_router() -> APIRouter:
+    router = APIRouter()
+
+    # ---------------------------------------------------------------
+    # POST /api/rfcs/<slug>/invitations
+    # The owner creates an invitation. The endpoint mints the token,
+    # writes the row, and dispatches the email synchronously. A failure
+    # to send the email does NOT roll back the row — the owner can
+    # share the link directly out-of-band if SMTP is briefly down (the
+    # `GET /api/rfcs/<slug>/invitations` response carries the token
+    # for that fallback).
+    # ---------------------------------------------------------------
+
+    @router.post("/api/rfcs/{slug}/invitations")
+    async def create_invitation(slug: str, body: CreateInvitationBody, request: Request) -> dict[str, Any]:
+        viewer = auth.require_contributor(request)
+        rfc = _require_rfc(slug)
+        if not auth.can_invite_to_rfc(viewer, slug):
+            raise HTTPException(
+                403,
+                "Only the RFC's owner can invite collaborators",
+            )
+
+        invitee_email = body.invitee_email.strip()
+        role_in_rfc = body.role_in_rfc
+
+        # Refuse re-inviting an email that already has a pending
+        # invitation on this RFC at the same role. Different-role
+        # re-invite is allowed (upgrade discussant → contributor)
+        # — the new row supersedes the old in the UI listing's
+        # natural ordering, and acceptance of either picks up the
+        # corresponding role.
+        existing = db.conn().execute(
+            """
+            SELECT id FROM rfc_invitations
+             WHERE rfc_slug = ? AND invitee_email = ? COLLATE NOCASE
+               AND role_in_rfc = ? AND status = 'pending'
+             LIMIT 1
+            """,
+            (slug, invitee_email, role_in_rfc),
+        ).fetchone()
+        if existing:
+            raise HTTPException(
+                409,
+                f"{invitee_email} already has a pending {role_in_rfc} invitation for this RFC",
+            )
+
+        token = _mint_token()
+        cur = db.conn().execute(
+            """
+            INSERT INTO rfc_invitations
+                (rfc_slug, inviter_user_id, invitee_email, role_in_rfc,
+                 token, expires_at)
+            VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, datetime('now', ?))
+            """,
+            (
+                slug,
+                viewer.user_id,
+                invitee_email,
+                role_in_rfc,
+                token,
+                f"+{INVITATION_TTL_DAYS} days",
+            ),
+        )
+        invitation_id = cur.lastrowid
+
+        # Send the email — synchronous. A send failure logs and
+        # returns; the row stays so the owner can recover via the
+        # listing (which carries the token for an out-of-band share).
+        _send_invitation_email(
+            to_address=invitee_email,
+            inviter_display=viewer.display_name or viewer.gitea_login or "An RFC owner",
+            rfc_title=rfc["title"],
+            role_in_rfc=role_in_rfc,
+            token=token,
+        )
+
+        return {
+            "id": invitation_id,
+            "rfc_slug": slug,
+            "invitee_email": invitee_email,
+            "role_in_rfc": role_in_rfc,
+            "status": "pending",
+            "token": token,
+        }
+
+    # ---------------------------------------------------------------
+    # GET /api/rfcs/<slug>/invitations
+    # The owner's listing of every invitation on the RFC, regardless
+    # of status. Carries the token (for the resend / re-share path).
+    # ---------------------------------------------------------------
+
+    @router.get("/api/rfcs/{slug}/invitations")
+    async def list_invitations(slug: str, request: Request) -> dict[str, Any]:
+        viewer = auth.require_contributor(request)
+        _require_rfc(slug)
+        if not auth.can_invite_to_rfc(viewer, slug):
+            raise HTTPException(
+                403,
+                "Only the RFC's owner can view invitations",
+            )
+
+        rows = db.conn().execute(
+            """
+            SELECT i.id, i.invitee_email, i.role_in_rfc, i.status, i.token,
+                   i.expires_at, i.created_at, i.accepted_at,
+                   i.inviter_user_id, i.accepted_by_user_id,
+                   u_inviter.display_name AS inviter_display,
+                   u_inviter.gitea_login AS inviter_login,
+                   u_accept.display_name AS accepted_by_display,
+                   u_accept.gitea_login AS accepted_by_login
+              FROM rfc_invitations i
+         LEFT JOIN users u_inviter ON u_inviter.id = i.inviter_user_id
+         LEFT JOIN users u_accept ON u_accept.id = i.accepted_by_user_id
+             WHERE i.rfc_slug = ?
+             ORDER BY i.id DESC
+            """,
+            (slug,),
+        ).fetchall()
+
+        return {
+            "items": [
+                {
+                    "id": r["id"],
+                    "invitee_email": r["invitee_email"],
+                    "role_in_rfc": r["role_in_rfc"],
+                    "status": _effective_status(r),
+                    "token": r["token"],
+                    "expires_at": r["expires_at"],
+                    "created_at": r["created_at"],
+                    "accepted_at": r["accepted_at"],
+                    "inviter_display": r["inviter_display"],
+                    "inviter_login": r["inviter_login"],
+                    "accepted_by_display": r["accepted_by_display"],
+                    "accepted_by_login": r["accepted_by_login"],
+                }
+                for r in rows
+            ],
+        }
+
+    # ---------------------------------------------------------------
+    # POST /api/rfcs/<slug>/invitations/<id>/revoke
+    # Revokes a pending invitation. Already-accepted invitations
+    # cannot be "revoked" from this surface — the corresponding
+    # collaborator-removal surface is a §19.2 candidate; v0.16.0
+    # only lifts the *pending* link.
+    # ---------------------------------------------------------------
+
+    @router.post("/api/rfcs/{slug}/invitations/{invitation_id}/revoke")
+    async def revoke_invitation(slug: str, invitation_id: int, request: Request) -> dict[str, Any]:
+        viewer = auth.require_contributor(request)
+        _require_rfc(slug)
+        if not auth.can_invite_to_rfc(viewer, slug):
+            raise HTTPException(
+                403,
+                "Only the RFC's owner can revoke invitations",
+            )
+
+        row = db.conn().execute(
+            "SELECT id, status FROM rfc_invitations WHERE id = ? AND rfc_slug = ?",
+            (invitation_id, slug),
+        ).fetchone()
+        if row is None:
+            raise HTTPException(404, "Invitation not found")
+        if row["status"] != "pending":
+            raise HTTPException(
+                409,
+                f"Invitation is {row['status']}; only pending invitations can be revoked",
+            )
+
+        db.conn().execute(
+            "UPDATE rfc_invitations SET status = 'revoked' WHERE id = ?",
+            (invitation_id,),
+        )
+        return {"ok": True, "id": invitation_id, "status": "revoked"}
+
+    # ---------------------------------------------------------------
+    # GET /api/invitations/accept?token=...
+    # Lookup-only — returns what the invitation grants so the
+    # frontend can render a confirmation page before the POST. The
+    # token is required; no token, no peek.
+    # ---------------------------------------------------------------
+
+    @router.get("/api/invitations/accept")
+    async def preview_invitation(token: str, request: Request) -> dict[str, Any]:
+        viewer = auth.require_user(request)
+        row = _lookup_invitation_by_token(token)
+        if row is None:
+            raise HTTPException(404, "Invitation not found")
+        effective = _effective_status(row)
+        rfc = db.conn().execute(
+            "SELECT slug, title FROM cached_rfcs WHERE slug = ?", (row["rfc_slug"],),
+        ).fetchone()
+        return {
+            "rfc_slug": row["rfc_slug"],
+            "rfc_title": rfc["title"] if rfc else row["rfc_slug"],
+            "role_in_rfc": row["role_in_rfc"],
+            "status": effective,
+            "invitee_email": row["invitee_email"],
+            "email_matches_you": (viewer.email or "").strip().lower()
+                                == row["invitee_email"].strip().lower(),
+            "expires_at": row["expires_at"],
+        }
+
+    # ---------------------------------------------------------------
+    # POST /api/invitations/accept
+    # The accept gesture: token → collaborator row.
+    #
+    # Requires:
+    #   * an authenticated user (no token-only acceptance — we want
+    #     the per-user audit trail),
+    #   * a valid (pending, non-expired, non-revoked) invitation,
+    #   * the accepting user's email matches invitee_email
+    #     (case-insensitive).
+    #
+    # On success the row's status flips to 'accepted' and a
+    # rfc_collaborators row is inserted (or upgraded if the user
+    # already had a lower role). Idempotent: re-accepting the same
+    # already-accepted invitation reads as a 200 no-op with
+    # `changed=false`.
+    # ---------------------------------------------------------------
+
+    @router.post("/api/invitations/accept")
+    async def accept_invitation(body: AcceptInvitationBody, request: Request) -> dict[str, Any]:
+        viewer = auth.require_user(request)
+        row = _lookup_invitation_by_token(body.token)
+        if row is None:
+            raise HTTPException(404, "Invitation not found")
+
+        effective = _effective_status(row)
+        if effective == "revoked":
+            raise HTTPException(409, "Invitation was revoked")
+        if effective == "expired":
+            raise HTTPException(409, "Invitation has expired")
+
+        # Email match — case-insensitive. Empty viewer email cannot
+        # accept (an OAuth-only user with no captured email shape).
+        viewer_email = (viewer.email or "").strip().lower()
+        invitee_email = row["invitee_email"].strip().lower()
+        if not viewer_email or viewer_email != invitee_email:
+            raise HTTPException(
+                403,
+                "This invitation was sent to a different email; sign in with that address",
+            )
+
+        if effective == "accepted":
+            # Idempotent re-accept — surface the existing collaborator
+            # row without writing anything new.
+            collab = db.conn().execute(
+                "SELECT role_in_rfc FROM rfc_collaborators WHERE rfc_slug = ? AND user_id = ?",
+                (row["rfc_slug"], viewer.user_id),
+            ).fetchone()
+            return {
+                "ok": True,
+                "changed": False,
+                "rfc_slug": row["rfc_slug"],
+                "role_in_rfc": collab["role_in_rfc"] if collab else row["role_in_rfc"],
+            }
+
+        # First-time accept. Flip the invitation; upsert the
+        # collaborator. We do the upsert with ON CONFLICT so a
+        # user who already held a lower role gets upgraded, never
+        # downgraded (the MAX-style precedence is contributor >
+        # discussant; lower roles never overwrite higher).
+        with db.tx() as c:
+            c.execute(
+                """
+                UPDATE rfc_invitations
+                   SET status = 'accepted',
+                       accepted_at = datetime('now'),
+                       accepted_by_user_id = ?
+                 WHERE id = ?
+                """,
+                (viewer.user_id, row["id"]),
+            )
+            existing = c.execute(
+                "SELECT role_in_rfc FROM rfc_collaborators WHERE rfc_slug = ? AND user_id = ?",
+                (row["rfc_slug"], viewer.user_id),
+            ).fetchone()
+            target_role = _max_role(
+                existing["role_in_rfc"] if existing else None,
+                row["role_in_rfc"],
+            )
+            if existing is None:
+                c.execute(
+                    """
+                    INSERT INTO rfc_collaborators
+                        (rfc_slug, user_id, role_in_rfc, invitation_id)
+                    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?)
+                    """,
+                    (row["rfc_slug"], viewer.user_id, target_role, row["id"]),
+                )
+            elif existing["role_in_rfc"] != target_role:
+                c.execute(
+                    """
+                    UPDATE rfc_collaborators
+                       SET role_in_rfc = ?, invitation_id = ?
+                     WHERE rfc_slug = ? AND user_id = ?
+                    """,
+                    (target_role, row["id"], row["rfc_slug"], viewer.user_id),
+                )
+
+        return {
+            "ok": True,
+            "changed": True,
+            "rfc_slug": row["rfc_slug"],
+            "role_in_rfc": target_role,
+        }
+
+    return router
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Helpers
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+def _require_rfc(slug: str):
+    """The invitation surface only operates on a known, non-withdrawn
+    RFC. We refuse 404 on unknown and 409 on withdrawn — mirrors the
+    discussion endpoints' `_require_rfc_readable` shape."""
+    row = db.conn().execute(
+        "SELECT slug, title, state FROM cached_rfcs WHERE slug = ?", (slug,),
+    ).fetchone()
+    if row is None:
+        raise HTTPException(404, "RFC not found")
+    if row["state"] == "withdrawn":
+        raise HTTPException(409, "RFC is withdrawn")
+    return row
+
+
+def _lookup_invitation_by_token(token: str):
+    return db.conn().execute(
+        """
+        SELECT id, rfc_slug, inviter_user_id, invitee_email, role_in_rfc,
+               status, token, expires_at, created_at, accepted_at,
+               accepted_by_user_id
+          FROM rfc_invitations
+         WHERE token = ?
+        """,
+        (token,),
+    ).fetchone()
+
+
+def _effective_status(row) -> str:
+    """The row's column status is the authoritative truth except for
+    `expired` — that is derived from `expires_at` at read time so an
+    unattended cron isn't required to flip rows. A revoked-then-
+    expired row reads as `revoked` (the explicit gesture wins)."""
+    column_status = row["status"]
+    if column_status != "pending":
+        return column_status
+    # Compare via SQL so the comparison is in sqlite-time, matching the
+    # `datetime('now')` insert. A simpler same-process comparison would
+    # work too, but routing through the DB keeps the timezone handling
+    # consistent with the inserts.
+    is_past = db.conn().execute(
+        "SELECT datetime(?) <= datetime('now') AS past",
+        (row["expires_at"],),
+    ).fetchone()["past"]
+    return "expired" if is_past else "pending"
+
+
+def _mint_token() -> str:
+    """A 256-bit URL-safe token. The token shape is opaque to the
+    consumer; the email link encodes it as a query param."""
+    return secrets.token_urlsafe(32)
+
+
+def _max_role(existing: str | None, new: str) -> str:
+    """contributor strictly dominates discussant. A re-accept that
+    would lower the role is a no-op (the existing role survives)."""
+    precedence = {"discussant": 0, "contributor": 1}
+    if existing is None:
+        return new
+    if precedence.get(new, 0) > precedence.get(existing, 0):
+        return new
+    return existing
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Email dispatch — transactional, no preferences honored
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+def _send_invitation_email(
+    *,
+    to_address: str,
+    inviter_display: str,
+    rfc_title: str,
+    role_in_rfc: str,
+    token: str,
+) -> bool:
+    """Compose and send the invitation email.
+
+    Like `email_otc.send_otc_email`, this writes its own envelope and
+    reuses `EmailConfig.from_env()` for the SMTP plumbing. The
+    `_SENT` buffer is appended either way so integration tests can
+    assert on the outbound shape without a real SMTP server.
+
+    Returns True on the happy path / dev fallback; False on SMTP
+    failure. The caller does not roll back the invitation row on
+    failure — the owner has the token in the create response and on
+    the listing surface for an out-of-band share.
+    """
+    cfg = EmailConfig.from_env()
+    subject = f"{inviter_display} invited you to {rfc_title} on {cfg.from_name}"
+    role_label = (
+        "open PRs against the RFC and join its discussion"
+        if role_in_rfc == "contributor"
+        else "join the RFC's discussion"
+    )
+    link = f"{cfg.app_url}/invitations/accept?token={token}"
+    body = (
+        f"{inviter_display} invited you to {rfc_title} on {cfg.from_name} as {role_in_rfc}.\n\n"
+        f"This invitation lets you {role_label}.\n\n"
+        f"Click to accept (you'll be asked to sign in first if you aren't already):\n\n"
+        f"    {link}\n\n"
+        f"The invitation expires in {INVITATION_TTL_DAYS} days. If you weren't expecting\n"
+        f"this, you can safely ignore the email.\n\n"
+        f"---\n"
+        f"{cfg.from_name} · {cfg.app_url}\n"
+    )
+    envelope = {
+        "to": to_address,
+        "from": formataddr((cfg.from_name, cfg.from_address)),
+        "subject": subject,
+        "body": body,
+        "kind": "rfc_invitation",
+    }
+    _SENT.append(envelope)
+
+    if not cfg.enabled:
+        log.info("invitation email disabled (EMAIL_ENABLED=0): to=%s", to_address)
+        return True
+    if not cfg.smtp_host:
+        # Dev fallback — surface the link at INFO so the operator can
+        # complete an accept flow without an SMTP relay.
+        log.info(
+            "invitation email (stdout fallback): to=%s rfc=%s role=%s link=%s",
+            to_address, rfc_title, role_in_rfc, link,
+        )
+        return True
+
+    try:
+        msg = EmailMessage()
+        msg["From"] = envelope["from"]
+        msg["To"] = to_address
+        msg["Subject"] = subject
+        msg.set_content(body)
+        smtp = smtplib.SMTP(cfg.smtp_host, cfg.smtp_port, timeout=30)
+        try:
+            if cfg.smtp_starttls:
+                smtp.starttls()
+            if cfg.smtp_user:
+                smtp.login(cfg.smtp_user, cfg.smtp_password)
+            smtp.send_message(msg)
+        finally:
+            smtp.quit()
+        return True
+    except Exception:
+        log.exception("invitation email send failed: to=%s", to_address)
+        return False

backend/app/api_prs.py

@@ -112,6 +112,17 @@ def make_router(
     @router.post("/api/rfcs/{slug}/branches/{branch:path}/open-pr")
     async def open_pr(slug: str, branch: str, body: OpenPRBody, request: Request) -> dict[str, Any]:
         viewer = auth.require_contributor(request)
+        # v0.16.0 (item #12): opening a PR is the canonical PR-shaped
+        # write — the gate fires here even though the branch-cutting
+        # entry points also gate, since a user with prior branch access
+        # who's since had their per-RFC role revoked shouldn't be able
+        # to ship the PR. The branch-creation gate is the kickoff
+        # refusal; this one is the post-work refusal.
+        if not auth.can_contribute_to_rfc(viewer, slug):
+            raise HTTPException(
+                403,
+                "This RFC's owner has not invited you to contribute PRs",
+            )
         rfc = _require_active_rfc(slug)
         if branch == "main":
             raise HTTPException(409, "PRs open from non-main branches")

backend/app/auth.py

@@ -30,6 +30,12 @@ class SessionUser:
     email: str
     avatar_url: str
     role: str
+    # v0.8.0 / §6.1 — admission gate. Three states: 'pending' (waiting
+    # for an admin grant), 'granted' (active contributor), 'revoked'
+    # (was granted, later removed). Existing rows at migration time
+    # default to 'granted' so grandfathered users are unaffected; OTC
+    # provisions fresh users with 'pending' (see `app/otc.py`).
+    permission_state: str = "granted"
 
     def as_actor(self) -> Actor:
         return Actor(
@@ -90,6 +96,13 @@ def allowlist_is_active() -> bool:
 def is_allowed_sign_in(profile: dict[str, Any]) -> bool:
     """Decide whether a freshly-completed OAuth profile may sign in.
 
+    v0.8.0 (item #6) replaces the allowlist gate with an admin-grant
+    flow at the OTC `/request` surface, but the Gitea OAuth callback
+    in `main.py` still consults this helper so the fallback path
+    keeps the v0.3.0 admission shape during the OAuth migration
+    window. The eventual removal of the OAuth callback (§19.2)
+    retires this function alongside it.
+
     Three accept paths:
       1. The allowlist is empty (gate off).
       2. The Gitea profile's email is in `allowed_emails` (case-insensitive).
@@ -132,17 +145,27 @@ def provision_user(config: Config, profile: dict[str, Any]) -> SessionUser:
     existing = c.execute("SELECT * FROM users WHERE gitea_id = ?", (gitea_id,)).fetchone()
     if existing is None:
         role = "owner" if config.owner_gitea_login and login == config.owner_gitea_login else "contributor"
+        # v0.8.0: a fresh OAuth-provisioned user is also subject to
+        # the admin-grant flow. The OAuth fallback only fires for
+        # users who pass `is_allowed_sign_in` (so they're already on
+        # the legacy allowlist or are grandfathered by gitea_id);
+        # 'granted' is the right default here since the allowlist
+        # check is itself the admin gesture. A future release that
+        # retires the OAuth callback (§19.2) collapses both paths
+        # under the same gate.
         cur = c.execute(
             """
-            INSERT INTO users (gitea_id, gitea_login, email, display_name, avatar_url, role)
-            VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
+            INSERT INTO users (gitea_id, gitea_login, email, display_name, avatar_url, role, permission_state)
+            VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, 'granted')
             """,
             (gitea_id, login, email, display, avatar, role),
         )
         user_id = cur.lastrowid
+        permission_state = "granted"
     else:
         user_id = existing["id"]
         role = existing["role"]
+        permission_state = existing["permission_state"] or "granted"
         c.execute(
             """
             UPDATE users
@@ -160,6 +183,7 @@ def provision_user(config: Config, profile: dict[str, Any]) -> SessionUser:
         email=email,
         avatar_url=avatar,
         role=role,
+        permission_state=permission_state,
     )
 
 
@@ -178,6 +202,12 @@ def store_session(request: Request, user: SessionUser) -> None:
         "email": user.email,
         "avatar_url": user.avatar_url,
         "role": user.role,
+        # v0.8.0: persist the admission state on the cookie payload so
+        # the post-cookie audit doesn't second-guess the row. The DB
+        # is re-read on every `current_user` call regardless (so an
+        # admin grant takes effect on the next request); this field
+        # is purely structural redundancy for the cookie shape.
+        "permission_state": user.permission_state,
     }
 
 
@@ -188,7 +218,7 @@ def current_user(request: Request) -> SessionUser | None:
     # Re-read the role from the database every request so role changes
     # take effect on the next API call without forcing a logout.
     row = db.conn().execute(
-        "SELECT id, gitea_id, gitea_login, email, display_name, avatar_url, role FROM users WHERE id = ?",
+        "SELECT id, gitea_id, gitea_login, email, display_name, avatar_url, role, permission_state FROM users WHERE id = ?",
         (raw["user_id"],),
     ).fetchone()
     if row is None:
@@ -199,6 +229,11 @@ def current_user(request: Request) -> SessionUser | None:
     # of which sign-in path the row came from. The DB remains the
     # source of truth for "is this an OAuth-linked user" (gitea_id IS
     # NOT NULL); the in-memory SessionUser is the per-request handle.
+    # v0.8.0: permission_state comes off the row directly. A NULL
+    # column value (shouldn't happen under the migration's
+    # NOT NULL DEFAULT, but be defensive) reads as 'granted' so the
+    # gate fails open for grandfathered surfaces rather than locking
+    # everyone out on a malformed row.
     return SessionUser(
         user_id=row["id"],
         gitea_id=row["gitea_id"] or 0,
@@ -207,6 +242,7 @@ def current_user(request: Request) -> SessionUser | None:
         email=row["email"] or "",
         avatar_url=row["avatar_url"] or "",
         role=row["role"],
+        permission_state=row["permission_state"] or "granted",
     )
 
 
@@ -218,11 +254,31 @@ def require_user(request: Request) -> SessionUser:
 
 
 def require_contributor(request: Request) -> SessionUser:
-    """§6.1: authenticated, not write-muted."""
+    """§6.1: authenticated, not write-muted, and granted by an admin.
+
+    v0.8.0 (item #6) widens this gate. A fresh OTC sign-in lands in
+    `permission_state='pending'`; the user can read everything an
+    anonymous viewer can read, but every write-shaped endpoint that
+    funnels through this dependency now refuses with 403 until an
+    admin grants them. The `pending` blast radius is the same as
+    anonymous (item #4 / v0.6.0 already audited the anon-write
+    refusal at every write site), so this widening is structurally
+    a relabel — the same surfaces that already refused 401 to
+    anonymous now also refuse 403 to pending.
+    """
     user = require_user(request)
     row = db.conn().execute("SELECT muted FROM users WHERE id = ?", (user.user_id,)).fetchone()
     if row and row["muted"]:
         raise HTTPException(status_code=403, detail="Your account is muted")
+    if user.permission_state != "granted":
+        # 'pending' is the post-OTC waiting state; 'revoked' is the
+        # admin-undid-the-grant state. Both refuse with the same 403
+        # shape; the client distinguishes via `/api/auth/me` which
+        # carries `permission_state` in the response.
+        raise HTTPException(
+            status_code=403,
+            detail="Your beta access request is in review",
+        )
     return user
 
 
@@ -234,5 +290,159 @@ def require_admin(request: Request) -> SessionUser:
     return user
 
 
+# v0.16.0 (roadmap item #12): per-RFC membership helpers.
+#
+# These don't replace `require_contributor` — they layer on top of it for
+# endpoints that an RFC's owner can selectively open up. The "discussion"
+# and "PR" write surfaces consult `is_rfc_writer(...)` / `is_rfc_discussant(...)`
+# to admit users who are either platform-privileged (admin, RFC owner)
+# OR who hold an explicit invitation-accepted per-RFC role.
+#
+# The platform gate still fires first: a user whose
+# `permission_state != 'granted'` cannot write anywhere, invitation or
+# not. v0.16.0 doesn't loosen that — a per-RFC invitation is additive
+# *within* the granted-platform-user population. (Accepting an
+# invitation as a pending user surfaces in the admin-page hook per
+# the roadmap text; the platform grant remains the admin's decision.)
+
+
+def _rfc_owners_set(rfc_slug: str) -> set[str]:
+    """The gitea_logins named in the RFC's frontmatter owners array.
+
+    Read from `cached_rfcs.owners_json`. Returns an empty set if the RFC
+    isn't cached (the caller's earlier `_require_rfc_readable` will
+    already have rejected that case in practice).
+    """
+    import json as _json
+    row = db.conn().execute(
+        "SELECT owners_json FROM cached_rfcs WHERE slug = ?", (rfc_slug,),
+    ).fetchone()
+    if row is None:
+        return set()
+    try:
+        return set(_json.loads(row["owners_json"] or "[]"))
+    except Exception:
+        return set()
+
+
+def is_rfc_owner(user: SessionUser | None, rfc_slug: str) -> bool:
+    """True iff the user is named in the RFC's frontmatter `owners`
+    list. The platform-level admin/owner check is separate; per §6.1 an
+    app admin/owner has all per-RFC capabilities by construction, but
+    this predicate is intentionally narrow — it answers "is this
+    person on the RFC's owners line?" and nothing more.
+    """
+    if user is None:
+        return False
+    return user.gitea_login in _rfc_owners_set(rfc_slug)
+
+
+def is_rfc_collaborator(user: SessionUser | None, rfc_slug: str, *, role_in_rfc: str | None = None) -> bool:
+    """True iff the user has an accepted per-RFC collaborator row.
+
+    `role_in_rfc`:
+      * None — any role qualifies (the discussion-write check uses this
+        shape: contributor strictly includes discussant).
+      * 'contributor' — only the contributor role qualifies (the PR-write
+        check uses this shape).
+      * 'discussant' — only the discussant role qualifies (not used by
+        v0.16.0 endpoints; included for symmetry).
+    """
+    if user is None:
+        return False
+    if role_in_rfc is None:
+        row = db.conn().execute(
+            "SELECT 1 FROM rfc_collaborators WHERE rfc_slug = ? AND user_id = ? LIMIT 1",
+            (rfc_slug, user.user_id),
+        ).fetchone()
+        return row is not None
+    row = db.conn().execute(
+        "SELECT 1 FROM rfc_collaborators WHERE rfc_slug = ? AND user_id = ? AND role_in_rfc = ? LIMIT 1",
+        (rfc_slug, user.user_id, role_in_rfc),
+    ).fetchone()
+    return row is not None
+
+
+def can_discuss_rfc(user: SessionUser | None, rfc_slug: str) -> bool:
+    """v0.16.0 — admit to PR-less discussion writes on this RFC.
+
+    True if ANY of:
+      * platform admin/owner (the §6.1 maximal-capability path),
+      * the RFC has no frontmatter owners yet (the gate is open
+        until an owner exists to set it — relevant for super-drafts
+        pre-§13.1 claim),
+      * RFC owner (frontmatter `owners` membership),
+      * accepted per-RFC collaborator at any role (contributor strictly
+        includes discussant).
+
+    Returns False for anonymous viewers and for users whose
+    `permission_state != 'granted'` — the platform-level gate must hold
+    before any per-RFC layer can apply. The platform gate is also
+    enforced earlier in the request via `require_contributor`; the
+    helper here is defensive so callers that compose it with
+    `current_user` directly still respect the gate.
+    """
+    if user is None:
+        return False
+    if user.permission_state != "granted":
+        return False
+    if user.role in ("owner", "admin"):
+        return True
+    owners = _rfc_owners_set(rfc_slug)
+    if not owners:
+        # No owner to gate the invite-list — fall through to the
+        # platform-granted contract. The first §13.1 claim engages
+        # the gate; before that, anyone platform-granted can
+        # contribute (mirrors the v0.5.0 / v0.6.0 contract).
+        return True
+    if user.gitea_login in owners:
+        return True
+    return is_rfc_collaborator(user, rfc_slug, role_in_rfc=None)
+
+
+def can_contribute_to_rfc(user: SessionUser | None, rfc_slug: str) -> bool:
+    """v0.16.0 — admit to PR-shaped writes on this RFC.
+
+    True if ANY of:
+      * platform admin/owner,
+      * the RFC has no frontmatter owners yet (gate open until an
+        owner exists),
+      * RFC owner,
+      * accepted per-RFC collaborator at role 'contributor' (a
+        'discussant' row is NOT sufficient — PRs are the
+        higher-privilege surface).
+
+    Same `permission_state` and anonymous-viewer refusals as
+    `can_discuss_rfc`.
+    """
+    if user is None:
+        return False
+    if user.permission_state != "granted":
+        return False
+    if user.role in ("owner", "admin"):
+        return True
+    owners = _rfc_owners_set(rfc_slug)
+    if not owners:
+        # Same fall-through as can_discuss_rfc: until an owner exists,
+        # the gate is open.
+        return True
+    if user.gitea_login in owners:
+        return True
+    return is_rfc_collaborator(user, rfc_slug, role_in_rfc="contributor")
+
+
+def can_invite_to_rfc(user: SessionUser | None, rfc_slug: str) -> bool:
+    """v0.16.0 — only RFC owners (frontmatter) and platform admin/owner
+    can issue invitations. Per-RFC collaborators do not get the
+    invite-others power; that stays with the RFC's owner."""
+    if user is None:
+        return False
+    if user.permission_state != "granted":
+        return False
+    if user.role in ("owner", "admin"):
+        return True
+    return is_rfc_owner(user, rfc_slug)
+
+
 def new_state() -> str:
     return secrets.token_urlsafe(16)

backend/app/device_trust.py

@@ -0,0 +1,351 @@
+"""§6.2 / v0.11.0: trust device for 30 days (roadmap item #9).
+
+After a successful OTC or passcode sign-in, a contributor may check
+"trust this device for 30 days." The framework then issues a
+server-issued opaque token, hashes it (bcrypt) for storage in the
+`device_trust` table, and sets a long-lived cookie carrying the raw
+token. On a subsequent visit, the cookie is presented at
+`/auth/device-trust/start`; if a non-expired, non-revoked row matches,
+the session is re-established without another OTC / passcode round
+trip.
+
+The shape:
+
+  * `issue(user_id, user_agent)` — mint a fresh CSPRNG token, hash it,
+    insert a row, and return the raw token + row id so the endpoint
+    can set the cookie. The 30-day expiry is the only knob; the
+    `revoked_at` column stays NULL.
+  * `lookup(raw_token)` — walk the user's active rows (the unique
+    index keys on the hash, so we read a small candidate set), check
+    the bcrypt hash in constant time, drop any row whose `expires_at`
+    has passed or whose `revoked_at` is non-NULL, and return the
+    matched row or None. On a hit, refresh `last_seen_at`.
+  * `list_for_user(user_id)` — return the active rows for the
+    /settings/devices surface. Revoked + expired rows are filtered out
+    so the surface only shows live trust grants.
+  * `revoke(user_id, row_id)` — stamp `revoked_at` on the row. The
+    next lookup refuses the cookie token (the row is dead).
+  * `revoke_all(user_id)` — bulk-revoke every active row for the user.
+    The /settings/devices surface's "revoke all" button calls this.
+
+Cookie shape: `rfc_device_trust`. HttpOnly, Secure, SameSite=Lax,
+Max-Age=2592000 (30 days), Path=/. The cookie value is the raw token;
+server-side storage is the hash. The cookie is "essential" per the
+v0.13.0 cookie-consent banner (it is part of authentication, not
+analytics), so the framework sets it regardless of analytics /
+other-cookies choices.
+
+Constant-time comparison: bcrypt's `checkpw` is already constant-time
+over the hash bytes. We walk the candidate set linearly with `_check`
+which delegates to `bcrypt.checkpw`; no early-exit shortcut leaks
+which row was the match.
+
+The raw token never appears in a log line or an exception message;
+the helpers carry the token only as a parameter and forget it after
+hashing.
+
+The cookie sits orthogonal to the §6.1 `permission_state` gate: a
+revoked or pending user with a valid device-trust cookie still
+re-establishes their session (the cookie identifies the user, not
+their admission state), and the existing `require_contributor` /
+`require_admin` dependencies in `auth.py` continue to refuse the
+unrelated write surfaces.
+"""
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import logging
+import secrets
+from dataclasses import dataclass
+
+import bcrypt
+
+from . import db
+from .auth import SessionUser
+
+log = logging.getLogger(__name__)
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Tunables — hard-coded in v0.11.0 (§19.2 candidate to env-ify later).
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+TRUST_DURATION_DAYS = 30
+COOKIE_NAME = "rfc_device_trust"
+COOKIE_MAX_AGE_SECONDS = TRUST_DURATION_DAYS * 24 * 60 * 60
+# 256 bits of CSPRNG entropy. `secrets.token_urlsafe(32)` yields ~43
+# URL-safe characters; the bcrypt hash is what's stored, so the raw
+# token only ever lives in the cookie.
+TOKEN_BYTES = 32
+# User-Agent header values seen in the wild can be unbounded; clamp
+# to a reasonable ceiling so a hostile UA doesn't bloat the row.
+USER_AGENT_MAX_LENGTH = 1024
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Issue
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+@dataclass
+class IssueOutcome:
+    """The shape returned from `issue`.
+
+    `raw_token` is the cookie value to send to the client; it never
+    appears in storage. `row_id` is the surrogate key for the
+    /settings/devices UI to address the row by id.
+    """
+    raw_token: str
+    row_id: int
+
+
+def _new_token() -> str:
+    return secrets.token_urlsafe(TOKEN_BYTES)
+
+
+def _hash(token: str) -> str:
+    return bcrypt.hashpw(token.encode("utf-8"), bcrypt.gensalt()).decode("ascii")
+
+
+def _check(token: str, token_hash: str) -> bool:
+    try:
+        return bcrypt.checkpw(token.encode("utf-8"), token_hash.encode("ascii"))
+    except (ValueError, TypeError):
+        return False
+
+
+def _trim_user_agent(ua: str) -> str:
+    ua = (ua or "").strip()
+    if len(ua) > USER_AGENT_MAX_LENGTH:
+        return ua[:USER_AGENT_MAX_LENGTH]
+    return ua
+
+
+def issue(user_id: int, user_agent: str) -> IssueOutcome:
+    """Mint a fresh device-trust token + row for `user_id`.
+
+    The row's expiry is set 30 days in the future. The hash, not the
+    raw token, lands in the database. The caller (the endpoint) sets
+    the cookie with the raw token returned here.
+    """
+    raw = _new_token()
+    h = _hash(raw)
+    ua = _trim_user_agent(user_agent)
+    cur = db.conn().execute(
+        f"""
+        INSERT INTO device_trust (user_id, device_token_hash, expires_at, user_agent)
+        VALUES (?, ?, datetime('now', '+{TRUST_DURATION_DAYS} days'), ?)
+        """,
+        (user_id, h, ua),
+    )
+    row_id = cur.lastrowid
+    return IssueOutcome(raw_token=raw, row_id=row_id)
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Lookup
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+@dataclass
+class LookupOutcome:
+    """The result of `lookup`.
+
+    `user` is populated only on a hit. `reason` distinguishes the
+    failure modes so the endpoint can decide whether to clear the
+    cookie ('expired', 'revoked', 'unknown') or just refuse ('invalid').
+    """
+    ok: bool
+    user: SessionUser | None
+    reason: str  # 'ok' | 'invalid' | 'unknown' | 'expired' | 'revoked'
+    row_id: int | None = None
+
+
+def lookup(raw_token: str) -> LookupOutcome:
+    """Resolve a presented cookie token to a user.
+
+    A hit refreshes `last_seen_at` on the matched row. A miss returns
+    a reason so the endpoint can clear the stale cookie if the row
+    was revoked or expired (vs. simply unknown, which probably means
+    the cookie was forged or the row was wiped by a /settings/devices
+    revoke from another browser).
+    """
+    raw = (raw_token or "").strip()
+    if not raw:
+        return LookupOutcome(ok=False, user=None, reason="invalid")
+
+    # The unique index on `device_token_hash` would let us SELECT by
+    # hash if bcrypt were a stable hash, but bcrypt incorporates a
+    # per-row salt — equal tokens produce different hashes. We walk
+    # the candidate set instead. In practice the set is small (a
+    # human has a handful of trusted devices) and bcrypt is cheap on
+    # the order of milliseconds; the walk is bounded by the user's
+    # active device count.
+    #
+    # We don't pre-filter by `revoked_at IS NULL` here so that a
+    # token presented for a recently-revoked row produces a
+    # 'revoked' outcome (the endpoint surfaces a different shape).
+    # Same for expired: we let the walk hit and classify after.
+    rows = db.conn().execute(
+        """
+        SELECT id, user_id, device_token_hash, expires_at, revoked_at
+          FROM device_trust
+         ORDER BY id DESC
+        """,
+    ).fetchall()
+
+    matched = None
+    for row in rows:
+        if _check(raw, row["device_token_hash"]):
+            matched = row
+            break
+
+    if matched is None:
+        return LookupOutcome(ok=False, user=None, reason="unknown")
+
+    if matched["revoked_at"] is not None:
+        return LookupOutcome(ok=False, user=None, reason="revoked", row_id=matched["id"])
+
+    expired = db.conn().execute(
+        "SELECT datetime(?) < datetime('now') AS expired",
+        (matched["expires_at"],),
+    ).fetchone()["expired"]
+    if expired:
+        return LookupOutcome(ok=False, user=None, reason="expired", row_id=matched["id"])
+
+    # Refresh last-seen so the /settings/devices surface can show the
+    # user when each device was last active. This is the only write
+    # the lookup path does on the hot read.
+    db.conn().execute(
+        "UPDATE device_trust SET last_seen_at = datetime('now') WHERE id = ?",
+        (matched["id"],),
+    )
+    user_row = db.conn().execute(
+        """
+        SELECT id, gitea_id, gitea_login, email, display_name, avatar_url, role, permission_state
+          FROM users
+         WHERE id = ?
+        """,
+        (matched["user_id"],),
+    ).fetchone()
+    if user_row is None:
+        # The user row was deleted but the device_trust row hadn't
+        # cascaded yet (shouldn't happen under the FK ON DELETE
+        # CASCADE — be defensive anyway). Treat as 'unknown' so the
+        # endpoint clears the cookie.
+        return LookupOutcome(ok=False, user=None, reason="unknown", row_id=matched["id"])
+
+    # Also stamp last_seen_at on the user row so the user's overall
+    # activity stamp keeps pace with cookie-only sign-ins.
+    db.conn().execute(
+        "UPDATE users SET last_seen_at = datetime('now') WHERE id = ?",
+        (matched["user_id"],),
+    )
+
+    return LookupOutcome(
+        ok=True,
+        user=SessionUser(
+            user_id=user_row["id"],
+            gitea_id=user_row["gitea_id"] or 0,
+            gitea_login=user_row["gitea_login"] or "",
+            display_name=user_row["display_name"],
+            email=user_row["email"] or "",
+            avatar_url=user_row["avatar_url"] or "",
+            role=user_row["role"],
+            permission_state=user_row["permission_state"] or "granted",
+        ),
+        reason="ok",
+        row_id=matched["id"],
+    )
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# List / revoke (for the /settings/devices surface)
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+@dataclass
+class DeviceRow:
+    """The shape the /settings/devices endpoint returns.
+
+    Note the absence of `device_token_hash` — the hash is structurally
+    private, and the surface has no use for it.
+    """
+    id: int
+    created_at: str
+    expires_at: str
+    last_seen_at: str
+    user_agent: str
+
+
+def list_for_user(user_id: int) -> list[DeviceRow]:
+    """Active device-trust rows for the user, freshest first.
+
+    Filters out revoked rows and rows whose expiry has passed; the
+    surface only shows live trust grants. A user wondering "which
+    devices are signed in" gets the answer that matches what the
+    framework would actually accept on a presented cookie.
+    """
+    rows = db.conn().execute(
+        """
+        SELECT id, created_at, expires_at, last_seen_at, user_agent
+          FROM device_trust
+         WHERE user_id = ?
+           AND revoked_at IS NULL
+           AND datetime(expires_at) > datetime('now')
+         ORDER BY last_seen_at DESC, id DESC
+        """,
+        (user_id,),
+    ).fetchall()
+    return [
+        DeviceRow(
+            id=row["id"],
+            created_at=row["created_at"],
+            expires_at=row["expires_at"],
+            last_seen_at=row["last_seen_at"],
+            user_agent=row["user_agent"] or "",
+        )
+        for row in rows
+    ]
+
+
+def revoke(user_id: int, row_id: int) -> bool:
+    """Revoke a single device-trust row for the given user.
+
+    Returns True iff a row was matched (still active, belongs to the
+    user). The user-id scope is enforced in SQL so a hostile client
+    cannot revoke another user's row by guessing ids.
+    """
+    cur = db.conn().execute(
+        """
+        UPDATE device_trust
+           SET revoked_at = datetime('now')
+         WHERE id = ?
+           AND user_id = ?
+           AND revoked_at IS NULL
+        """,
+        (row_id, user_id),
+    )
+    return cur.rowcount > 0
+
+
+def revoke_all(user_id: int) -> int:
+    """Revoke every active device-trust row for the user. Returns the
+    count of rows touched.
+
+    The /settings/devices "revoke all" button calls this. The user's
+    current request stays authenticated via its session cookie; the
+    device-trust cookie on the current device is also revoked, but
+    the session middleware's `rfc_session` cookie keeps the request
+    flow alive until the user signs out or the session cookie
+    expires.
+    """
+    cur = db.conn().execute(
+        """
+        UPDATE device_trust
+           SET revoked_at = datetime('now')
+         WHERE user_id = ?
+           AND revoked_at IS NULL
+        """,
+        (user_id,),
+    )
+    return cur.rowcount

backend/app/docs.py

@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
+"""User-facing docs source.
+
+Mirrors `philosophy.py` shape. Serves `DOCS.md` from the repo root —
+the framework's plain-prose user guide to roles, contribution flow,
+and notification surfaces, distinct from the binding `SPEC.md`. Read
+from disk on first call and cached in-process; the periodic
+reconciler can call `refresh()` to pick up out-of-band edits.
+
+`DOCS_PATH` overrides the default location if a deployment hosts the
+file elsewhere (a meta-repo working-tree clone, a sync target, etc.).
+"""
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import logging
+import os
+import threading
+from pathlib import Path
+
+log = logging.getLogger(__name__)
+
+
+_DEFAULT_PATH = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[2] / "DOCS.md"
+
+_lock = threading.Lock()
+_cache: dict | None = None
+
+
+def _resolved_path() -> Path:
+    override = os.environ.get("DOCS_PATH", "").strip()
+    if override:
+        return Path(override).expanduser().resolve()
+    return _DEFAULT_PATH
+
+
+def load(force: bool = False) -> dict:
+    """Return the cached `{body, path, mtime}` payload, reading from disk
+    on first call or when `force=True`.
+    """
+    global _cache
+    with _lock:
+        if _cache is not None and not force:
+            return _cache
+        path = _resolved_path()
+        try:
+            text = path.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
+            mtime = path.stat().st_mtime
+        except FileNotFoundError:
+            log.warning("DOCS.md not found at %s — serving placeholder", path)
+            text = (
+                "# DOCS.md not found\n\n"
+                "The deployment is missing its user guide. Set "
+                "DOCS_PATH or place DOCS.md at the project root."
+            )
+            mtime = 0.0
+        _cache = {"body": text, "path": str(path), "mtime": mtime}
+        return _cache
+
+
+def refresh() -> dict:
+    """Force-reread from disk. Returns the new payload."""
+    return load(force=True)

backend/app/email.py

@@ -139,6 +139,10 @@ _EVENT_TO_CATEGORY: dict[str, str] = {
     "graduation_complete": "personal-direct",
     "super_draft_graduation_ready": "admin-actionable",
     "claim_opened": "structural",
+    # v0.9.0: roadmap item #7. A fresh beta-access request lands as
+    # an admin-actionable signal so it consults `email_admin_actionable`
+    # and reaches owners/admins only.
+    "new_beta_request": "admin-actionable",
 }
 
 
@@ -285,6 +289,13 @@ def _deep_link(payload: dict, cfg: EmailConfig) -> str:
     slug = payload.get("rfc_slug")
     pr = payload.get("pr_number")
     branch = payload.get("branch_name")
+    event_kind = payload.get("event_kind")
+    # v0.9.0: framework-scoped admin signals link to the admin
+    # surface, not /rfc/... The `new_beta_request` event is the
+    # canonical example; future framework-scoped admin events
+    # may reuse the same branch.
+    if event_kind == "new_beta_request":
+        return f"{cfg.app_url}/admin/users"
     if slug and pr:
         return f"{cfg.app_url}/rfc/{slug}/pr/{pr}"
     if slug and branch:

backend/app/email_invite.py

@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
+"""Outbound admin-invite email — a thin wrapper over the existing SMTP layer.
+
+v0.17.0 / roadmap item #16: when an admin uses `POST /api/admin/users` to
+create-with-invite, this module composes and sends the invite envelope.
+
+Structurally distinct from:
+
+  * `email_otc.py` (v0.7.0) — that one carries a credential the user
+    just requested; this one carries a credential the admin is sending
+    unsolicited.
+  * `email.py` (§15.4 notification mailer) — that one is inbox-driven,
+    bundled, with category opt-outs; this one is a single transactional
+    outbound to a person who does not yet have an inbox.
+  * v0.9.0's `new_beta_request` admin notification — that one is
+    invitee-to-admin (an existing pending user asking to be let in);
+    this one is admin-to-invitee (an admin reaching out to seed access).
+
+So this module reuses `EmailConfig.from_env()` for the SMTP plumbing
+and the From identity, but writes its own envelope. In dev (no
+SMTP_HOST set), the envelope is logged at INFO level and pushed to
+the same `_SENT` buffer the notification mailer uses, so the
+integration tests can assert on the outbound shape without standing
+up an SMTP server.
+
+The send is synchronous. The admin endpoint returns 200 on the
+create-row half regardless of send outcome — a transient SMTP
+failure should not roll back the invite (an admin can re-send via a
+future "resend invite" gesture, deferred to a follow-up release).
+"""
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import logging
+import smtplib
+from email.message import EmailMessage
+from email.utils import formataddr
+
+from .email import EmailConfig, _SENT
+
+log = logging.getLogger(__name__)
+
+
+def send_invite_email(
+    *,
+    to_address: str,
+    claim_url: str,
+    inviter_display: str,
+    inviter_email: str,
+    custom_message: str = "",
+) -> bool:
+    """Compose and send the admin-invite email. Returns True on the
+    happy path; False on SMTP failure. The notifier-side buffer
+    `_SENT` is appended either way so tests can assert on content.
+
+    The body names the inviting admin, embeds the optional custom
+    message in a clearly delimited block if present, and ships the
+    claim link. The subject names the inviter so the recipient can
+    recognize the sender at a glance in their inbox preview.
+    """
+    cfg = EmailConfig.from_env()
+    subject = _subject(inviter_display, cfg)
+    body = _body(claim_url, inviter_display, inviter_email, custom_message, cfg)
+    envelope = {
+        "to": to_address,
+        "from": formataddr((cfg.from_name, cfg.from_address)),
+        "subject": subject,
+        "body": body,
+        "kind": "invite",
+    }
+    _SENT.append(envelope)
+
+    if not cfg.enabled:
+        log.info("invite email disabled (EMAIL_ENABLED=0): to=%s", to_address)
+        return True
+    if not cfg.smtp_host:
+        # Dev fallback: surface the claim URL at INFO so the operator can
+        # complete a claim flow without an SMTP relay. In production
+        # SMTP_HOST is always set per OHM's overlay.
+        log.info("invite email (stdout fallback): to=%s claim_url=%s", to_address, claim_url)
+        return True
+
+    try:
+        msg = EmailMessage()
+        msg["From"] = envelope["from"]
+        msg["To"] = to_address
+        msg["Subject"] = subject
+        msg.set_content(body)
+        smtp = smtplib.SMTP(cfg.smtp_host, cfg.smtp_port, timeout=30)
+        try:
+            if cfg.smtp_starttls:
+                smtp.starttls()
+            if cfg.smtp_user:
+                smtp.login(cfg.smtp_user, cfg.smtp_password)
+            smtp.send_message(msg)
+        finally:
+            smtp.quit()
+        return True
+    except Exception:
+        log.exception("invite email send failed: to=%s", to_address)
+        return False
+
+
+def _subject(inviter_display: str, cfg: EmailConfig) -> str:
+    """e.g. "You're invited to Wiggleverse by Ben Stull"."""
+    inviter = inviter_display or "an admin"
+    return f"You're invited to {cfg.from_name} by {inviter}"
+
+
+def _body(
+    claim_url: str,
+    inviter_display: str,
+    inviter_email: str,
+    custom_message: str,
+    cfg: EmailConfig,
+) -> str:
+    inviter = inviter_display or "An admin"
+    inviter_suffix = f" ({inviter_email})" if inviter_email else ""
+    message_block = ""
+    if custom_message.strip():
+        # Indent the custom message so it reads as a clearly-delimited
+        # quote rather than running together with the framework's
+        # framing text. Per-line indent keeps multi-line messages
+        # visually grouped in plain-text mail clients.
+        indented = "\n".join(f"    {line}" for line in custom_message.strip().splitlines())
+        message_block = f"\nA personal note from {inviter}:\n\n{indented}\n"
+
+    return (
+        f"{inviter}{inviter_suffix} has invited you to {cfg.from_name}.\n"
+        f"{message_block}\n"
+        f"Click the link below to claim your account and sign in.\n"
+        f"This link is single-use and expires in 7 days.\n\n"
+        f"    {claim_url}\n\n"
+        f"If you weren't expecting this invitation, you can ignore this\n"
+        f"email — no account becomes active until you click the link.\n\n"
+        f"---\n"
+        f"{cfg.from_name} · {cfg.app_url}\n"
+    )

backend/app/invites.py

@@ -0,0 +1,425 @@
+"""§6.1 / v0.17.0: admin-create user with role + invite email (roadmap item #16).
+
+Distinguishes from the v0.8.0 self-serve beta-access flow:
+
+  * **Self-serve (v0.8.0)** — anyone with an email can request OTC sign-in;
+    a fresh `users` row lands in `permission_state='pending'`; an admin
+    grants or revokes via the v0.9.0 user-management page.
+
+  * **Admin-create (v0.17.0)** — an admin types first/last/email/role
+    *before* the invitee has signed in. The framework provisions the
+    `users` row with the chosen role and `permission_state='granted'`
+    (the admin's hand is the grant) and `last_seen_at IS NULL` as the
+    "invited but not yet arrived" discriminator. An invite-token row
+    lands in `user_invite_tokens`; the admin's chosen `custom_message`
+    (if any) rides in the email body alongside the claim link.
+
+  * **Claim flow** — the invitee clicks the link, which lands them at
+    `/invites/claim?token=…`. The page POSTs `/api/invites/claim` with
+    the token. The framework verifies the token (not expired, not
+    claimed, hash matches), marks the row claimed, signs the user in,
+    and returns a payload telling the frontend whether to route to
+    passcode-set (if v0.10.0 passcode flow is in play and the user has
+    no passcode yet) or to `/`. **No OTC roundtrip** — clicking the
+    unique token in the email is itself proof of email control, per
+    the roadmap. This is the intentional UX shortcut for first
+    sign-in; subsequent sign-ins use the standard OTC / passcode
+    paths.
+
+The shape:
+
+  * `create_invite(...)` — provision the invitee `users` row + the
+    `user_invite_tokens` row, return the raw token for the admin
+    endpoint to put in the outbound email link.
+  * `claim(raw_token)` — validate the token, mark it claimed, return
+    the `SessionUser` the endpoint signs in. Distinguishes the failure
+    modes (`expired`, `claimed`, `unknown`, `invalid`) so the endpoint
+    can map them to HTTP 410 vs HTTP 404 cleanly.
+  * `list_pending_invites()` — return active invites for the admin
+    listing surface. Filters out claimed + expired rows so the surface
+    only shows live invites.
+
+Token shape: opaque DB token (256 bits of CSPRNG entropy via
+`secrets.token_urlsafe(32)`), bcrypt-hashed at rest. Opaque chosen
+over JWT because revocation is then a single SQL UPDATE — a JWT
+would be stateless but harder to invalidate, and admin-issued
+invites are exactly the kind of thing an admin should be able to
+yank back. The raw token only ever lives in the outbound email link
+and the inbound claim body; server-side storage is the hash.
+
+TTL: hard-coded to 7 days via `INVITE_TOKEN_TTL_DAYS`. Env-var
+configurability is a §19.2 candidate — the constant is exposed
+here as a single point of edit if a deployment wants to override.
+
+The 500-char ceiling on `custom_message` is enforced at the
+Pydantic body level in `api_admin.py`; this module trusts what
+the endpoint hands it.
+"""
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import logging
+import secrets
+from dataclasses import dataclass
+
+import bcrypt
+
+from . import db
+from .auth import SessionUser
+
+log = logging.getLogger(__name__)
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Tunables — intentionally hard-coded in v0.17.0 (§19.2 candidate to env-ify).
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+INVITE_TOKEN_TTL_DAYS = 7
+# 256 bits of CSPRNG entropy. `secrets.token_urlsafe(32)` yields ~43
+# URL-safe characters; the bcrypt hash is what's stored, so the raw
+# token only ever lives in the outbound email link.
+TOKEN_BYTES = 32
+# Free-text ceiling for the admin's optional custom message. Matched
+# at the Pydantic body bound in `api_admin.py`; mentioned here so the
+# bound is documented in one place.
+CUSTOM_MESSAGE_MAX_LENGTH = 500
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Token + hash helpers (mirror device_trust.py shape)
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+def _new_token() -> str:
+    return secrets.token_urlsafe(TOKEN_BYTES)
+
+
+def _hash(token: str) -> str:
+    return bcrypt.hashpw(token.encode("utf-8"), bcrypt.gensalt()).decode("ascii")
+
+
+def _check(token: str, token_hash: str) -> bool:
+    try:
+        return bcrypt.checkpw(token.encode("utf-8"), token_hash.encode("ascii"))
+    except (ValueError, TypeError):
+        return False
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Create
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+@dataclass
+class CreateOutcome:
+    """The shape returned from `create_invite`.
+
+    `raw_token` is what the admin endpoint puts in the outbound email
+    link; it never appears in storage. `invite_id` is the surrogate
+    key for the admin's "invites I've sent" listing. `invited_user_id`
+    is the freshly-provisioned `users` row id so the admin surface can
+    join through to the user-management page.
+    """
+    raw_token: str
+    invite_id: int
+    invited_user_id: int
+
+
+def create_invite(
+    *,
+    email: str,
+    first_name: str,
+    last_name: str,
+    role: str,
+    custom_message: str,
+    created_by_admin_id: int,
+) -> CreateOutcome:
+    """Provision the invitee `users` row + the `user_invite_tokens` row.
+
+    Caller (`api_admin.py`) is responsible for the admin-only auth check,
+    the self-email refusal (422), and the duplicate-email refusal (409).
+    This function trusts what it's handed and writes both rows
+    transactionally — the v0.10.0 `passcode.py` / v0.11.0 `device_trust.py`
+    helpers follow the same separation-of-concerns pattern.
+
+    The invitee `users` row is provisioned with:
+      * `permission_state='granted'` — the admin's hand is the grant;
+        the v0.8.0 self-serve `pending` queue is for the other path.
+      * `last_seen_at = NULL` — the discriminator for "invited but
+        not yet arrived" per the §16 / roadmap design. Every sign-in
+        path stamps `last_seen_at` to now, so a NULL value means the
+        invited user has not clicked through yet.
+      * `gitea_id = NULL`, `gitea_login = NULL` — same as a v0.7.0
+        OTC-provisioned user; the OAuth identity is grandfathered if
+        the user ever lands through that path.
+      * `display_name` defaults to "<first> <last>" (or local-part of
+        email if both are empty) so the user-management page reads a
+        sensible label before the user has signed in.
+      * `first_name` / `last_name` / `beta_request_reason` — the
+        first two from the admin's typed values; reason stays blank
+        (this user did not self-request access).
+    """
+    email_clean = email.strip()
+    first_clean = (first_name or "").strip()
+    last_clean = (last_name or "").strip()
+    display = " ".join(p for p in (first_clean, last_clean) if p).strip()
+    if not display:
+        display = email_clean.split("@", 1)[0] or email_clean
+
+    # 1. Provision the invitee users row. The grant is the admin's
+    # hand; no permission_events row is necessary for the grant itself
+    # (we are not transitioning from pending → granted, we are landing
+    # a fresh row directly into granted).
+    #
+    # Note on the "pending invite" discriminator: the brief floated
+    # `first_sign_in_at NULL` / `last_seen_at NULL` as the marker the
+    # admin user-management page reads off the row to render the
+    # "(pending invite)" badge. The schema didn't cooperate — the
+    # existing `users.last_seen_at` column is NOT NULL with a
+    # `datetime('now')` default (see `migrations/001_users_and_audit.sql`),
+    # and there is no `first_sign_in_at` column. Rather than introduce
+    # a schema migration to add one (the brief explicitly said "likely
+    # no `users` table changes"), the discriminator is the existence of
+    # an active row in `user_invite_tokens` joined on `invited_user_id`.
+    # The admin listing's `pending_invite` field joins through that
+    # table; the claim flow stamps `claimed_at` on the invite row,
+    # which clears the badge naturally. This shape keeps the
+    # discriminator scoped to the v0.17.0 surface and avoids
+    # double-tracking against an existing column.
+    cur = db.conn().execute(
+        """
+        INSERT INTO users (
+            gitea_id, gitea_login, email, display_name, avatar_url,
+            role, permission_state, first_name, last_name
+        )
+        VALUES (NULL, NULL, ?, ?, '', ?, 'granted', ?, ?)
+        """,
+        (email_clean, display, role, first_clean, last_clean),
+    )
+    invited_user_id = cur.lastrowid
+
+    # 2. Mint the token, hash it, write the invite row.
+    raw = _new_token()
+    h = _hash(raw)
+    cur = db.conn().execute(
+        f"""
+        INSERT INTO user_invite_tokens (
+            email, role, first_name, last_name, custom_message,
+            token_hash, expires_at, created_by_admin_id, invited_user_id
+        )
+        VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, datetime('now', '+{INVITE_TOKEN_TTL_DAYS} days'), ?, ?)
+        """,
+        (
+            email_clean,
+            role,
+            first_clean,
+            last_clean,
+            (custom_message or "").strip(),
+            h,
+            created_by_admin_id,
+            invited_user_id,
+        ),
+    )
+    invite_id = cur.lastrowid
+    return CreateOutcome(
+        raw_token=raw,
+        invite_id=invite_id,
+        invited_user_id=invited_user_id,
+    )
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Claim
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+@dataclass
+class ClaimOutcome:
+    """The result of `claim`.
+
+    `user` is populated only on success. `reason` distinguishes the
+    failure modes so the endpoint can return distinct HTTP statuses
+    (HTTP 410 for expired/claimed — the token is dead; HTTP 400 for
+    unknown/invalid — the request shape is wrong).
+    """
+    ok: bool
+    user: SessionUser | None
+    reason: str  # 'ok' | 'invalid' | 'unknown' | 'expired' | 'claimed'
+    invite_id: int | None = None
+
+
+def claim(raw_token: str) -> ClaimOutcome:
+    """Validate the presented token and consume it.
+
+    Walks the active invite rows looking for a bcrypt hash match.
+    Mirrors `device_trust.lookup`: bcrypt's per-row salt means we
+    cannot SELECT by hash, but the set is small (a deployment's
+    outstanding invites at any moment) and bcrypt is cheap on the
+    order of milliseconds.
+
+    On a hit:
+      * Mark the row claimed (stamp `claimed_at = now`,
+        `claimed_by_user_id = invited_user_id` — the admin's
+        pre-provisioned row is the claimant).
+      * Stamp `last_seen_at = now` on the user row so the v0.9.0
+        admin user-management page no longer shows "(pending invite)".
+      * Return a populated `SessionUser` for the endpoint to sign in.
+
+    On a miss:
+      * `unknown` — no row matched. The token may have been forged or
+        the invite was admin-revoked.
+      * `expired` — row matched but `expires_at` is in the past.
+      * `claimed` — row matched but `claimed_at` is non-NULL. The
+        token was already consumed; the user must contact the admin
+        for a fresh invite.
+      * `invalid` — the token string itself was empty or unparseable.
+    """
+    raw = (raw_token or "").strip()
+    if not raw:
+        return ClaimOutcome(ok=False, user=None, reason="invalid")
+
+    rows = db.conn().execute(
+        """
+        SELECT id, token_hash, expires_at, claimed_at, invited_user_id, role
+          FROM user_invite_tokens
+         ORDER BY id DESC
+        """
+    ).fetchall()
+
+    matched = None
+    for row in rows:
+        if _check(raw, row["token_hash"]):
+            matched = row
+            break
+
+    if matched is None:
+        return ClaimOutcome(ok=False, user=None, reason="unknown")
+
+    if matched["claimed_at"] is not None:
+        return ClaimOutcome(
+            ok=False, user=None, reason="claimed", invite_id=matched["id"],
+        )
+
+    expired = db.conn().execute(
+        "SELECT datetime(?) < datetime('now') AS expired",
+        (matched["expires_at"],),
+    ).fetchone()["expired"]
+    if expired:
+        return ClaimOutcome(
+            ok=False, user=None, reason="expired", invite_id=matched["id"],
+        )
+
+    # Consume the row before signing in so a parallel claim of the same
+    # token cannot double-sign-in. (Mirrors `otc.verify_code`'s consume-
+    # before-provision shape.)
+    db.conn().execute(
+        """
+        UPDATE user_invite_tokens
+           SET claimed_at = datetime('now'),
+               claimed_by_user_id = invited_user_id
+         WHERE id = ?
+        """,
+        (matched["id"],),
+    )
+    # Stamp last_seen_at on the user row so the user's activity stamp
+    # is current after the claim (mirroring otc.verify_code's
+    # last-seen update on the provision path). The "(pending invite)"
+    # badge's clear is driven by the invite row's `claimed_at`
+    # transition above; this update is for the general user-listing's
+    # recency ordering.
+    db.conn().execute(
+        "UPDATE users SET last_seen_at = datetime('now') WHERE id = ?",
+        (matched["invited_user_id"],),
+    )
+
+    user_row = db.conn().execute(
+        """
+        SELECT id, gitea_id, gitea_login, email, display_name, avatar_url,
+               role, permission_state
+          FROM users
+         WHERE id = ?
+        """,
+        (matched["invited_user_id"],),
+    ).fetchone()
+    if user_row is None:
+        # The invitee user row was deleted between create_invite and
+        # claim (shouldn't happen under the FK ON DELETE CASCADE — the
+        # cascade would drop the invite row too — be defensive anyway).
+        return ClaimOutcome(
+            ok=False, user=None, reason="unknown", invite_id=matched["id"],
+        )
+
+    return ClaimOutcome(
+        ok=True,
+        user=SessionUser(
+            user_id=user_row["id"],
+            gitea_id=user_row["gitea_id"] or 0,
+            gitea_login=user_row["gitea_login"] or "",
+            display_name=user_row["display_name"],
+            email=user_row["email"] or "",
+            avatar_url=user_row["avatar_url"] or "",
+            role=user_row["role"],
+            permission_state=user_row["permission_state"] or "granted",
+        ),
+        reason="ok",
+        invite_id=matched["id"],
+    )
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# List pending invites — for the admin's review surface
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+@dataclass
+class PendingInviteRow:
+    """The shape the `GET /api/admin/users/invites` endpoint returns.
+
+    Note the absence of `token_hash` — the hash is structurally private,
+    and the surface has no use for it. The raw token is also not on
+    the listing; it lives only in the email link.
+    """
+    id: int
+    email: str
+    role: str
+    first_name: str
+    last_name: str
+    custom_message: str
+    created_at: str
+    expires_at: str
+    created_by_admin_id: int
+    invited_user_id: int
+
+
+def list_pending_invites() -> list[PendingInviteRow]:
+    """Active invites (not claimed, not expired), freshest first.
+
+    The admin's "I sent these but they haven't been claimed yet" view.
+    Filters mirror the `device_trust.list_for_user` shape: the surface
+    only shows live records the framework would actually accept on a
+    presented token.
+    """
+    rows = db.conn().execute(
+        """
+        SELECT id, email, role, first_name, last_name, custom_message,
+               created_at, expires_at, created_by_admin_id, invited_user_id
+          FROM user_invite_tokens
+         WHERE claimed_at IS NULL
+           AND datetime(expires_at) > datetime('now')
+         ORDER BY created_at DESC, id DESC
+        """
+    ).fetchall()
+    return [
+        PendingInviteRow(
+            id=row["id"],
+            email=row["email"],
+            role=row["role"],
+            first_name=row["first_name"] or "",
+            last_name=row["last_name"] or "",
+            custom_message=row["custom_message"] or "",
+            created_at=row["created_at"],
+            expires_at=row["expires_at"],
+            created_by_admin_id=row["created_by_admin_id"],
+            invited_user_id=row["invited_user_id"],
+        )
+        for row in rows
+    ]

backend/app/main.py

@@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ import logging
 import secrets
 from contextlib import asynccontextmanager
 
-from fastapi import APIRouter, FastAPI, HTTPException, Request
-from fastapi.responses import RedirectResponse
+from fastapi import APIRouter, FastAPI, HTTPException, Request, Response
+from fastapi.responses import JSONResponse, RedirectResponse
 from pydantic import BaseModel, Field
 from starlette.middleware.sessions import SessionMiddleware
 
@@ -20,11 +20,15 @@ from . import (
     auth,
     cache,
     db,
+    device_trust as device_trust_mod,
     digest,
     email_otc,
     hygiene,
+    invites as invites_mod,
     otc,
+    passcode as passcode_mod,
     providers as providers_mod,
+    turnstile,
     webhooks,
 )
 from .bot import Bot
@@ -37,11 +41,55 @@ log = logging.getLogger("rfc_app")
 
 class OtcRequestBody(BaseModel):
     email: str = Field(min_length=3, max_length=320)
+    # v0.12.0 / roadmap item #10: CloudFlare Turnstile token from the
+    # frontend widget. Optional in the body so a deployment that has
+    # not yet wired the Turnstile site key (or a dev environment with
+    # the widget intentionally skipped) still routes through the same
+    # endpoint; the backend turnstile.verify_token call decides whether
+    # to admit the request based on `TURNSTILE_REQUIRED` + presence of
+    # the secret.
+    turnstile_token: str | None = Field(default=None, max_length=4096)
 
 
 class OtcVerifyBody(BaseModel):
     email: str = Field(min_length=3, max_length=320)
     code: str = Field(min_length=1, max_length=16)
+    # v0.11.0 — "trust this device for 30 days" checkbox on the Login.jsx
+    # OTC step. When true and verify succeeds, the server issues a fresh
+    # device-trust row and sets the `rfc_device_trust` cookie on the
+    # response. Defaults to false so existing clients that don't send
+    # the flag continue to behave the way they did pre-v0.11.0.
+    trust_device: bool = False
+
+
+class PasscodeSetBody(BaseModel):
+    passcode: str = Field(min_length=1, max_length=64)
+
+
+class PasscodeVerifyBody(BaseModel):
+    email: str = Field(min_length=3, max_length=320)
+    passcode: str = Field(min_length=1, max_length=64)
+    # v0.11.0 — same trust-device opt-in as the OTC verify body.
+    trust_device: bool = False
+
+
+class InviteClaimBody(BaseModel):
+    """v0.17.0 / roadmap item #16 — claim an admin-issued invite token.
+
+    The frontend `/invites/claim?token=…` page reads the token from
+    the URL and POSTs it here. The body bound matches the
+    `secrets.token_urlsafe(32)` output shape (~43 URL-safe chars);
+    the upper bound stays generous in case `TOKEN_BYTES` is ever
+    raised. The token-shape is opaque to this layer — `invites.claim`
+    bcrypt-checks it against the active candidate set.
+    """
+    token: str = Field(min_length=1, max_length=512)
+    # v0.11.0-style opt-in: the claim flow's "trust this device" gesture
+    # is bundled here so the invitee can land trusted on first sign-in
+    # without an extra roundtrip. Defaults to false so the gesture is
+    # explicit (the frontend modal renders a checkbox alongside the
+    # claim CTA).
+    trust_device: bool = False
 
 
 @asynccontextmanager
@@ -107,6 +155,48 @@ def create_app() -> FastAPI:
 app = create_app()
 
 
+def _set_device_trust_cookie(response: Response, raw_token: str) -> None:
+    """Attach the v0.11.0 device-trust cookie to the response.
+
+    HttpOnly + Secure + SameSite=Lax + 30-day Max-Age + Path=/. The
+    cookie value is the raw token; server-side storage is the hash.
+    The cookie is "essential" per the v0.13.0 cookie-consent contract
+    (it is part of authentication), so we set it regardless of the
+    user's analytics / other-cookies choice.
+
+    Secure=True means the cookie is only ever sent over HTTPS. The
+    SessionMiddleware in `create_app` keeps `https_only=False` for
+    dev parity, but the device-trust cookie holds a 30-day credential
+    and must not travel cleartext — production deployments serve over
+    HTTPS, so Secure on the device-trust cookie is non-negotiable.
+    """
+    response.set_cookie(
+        key=device_trust_mod.COOKIE_NAME,
+        value=raw_token,
+        max_age=device_trust_mod.COOKIE_MAX_AGE_SECONDS,
+        path="/",
+        secure=True,
+        httponly=True,
+        samesite="lax",
+    )
+
+
+def _clear_device_trust_cookie(response: Response) -> None:
+    """Delete the device-trust cookie on the response.
+
+    Used when the framework detects a presented cookie that is
+    expired, revoked, or otherwise stale — the next request from
+    this device will not carry a dead token.
+    """
+    response.delete_cookie(
+        key=device_trust_mod.COOKIE_NAME,
+        path="/",
+        secure=True,
+        httponly=True,
+        samesite="lax",
+    )
+
+
 def _oauth_router(config) -> APIRouter:
     router = APIRouter()
 
@@ -154,7 +244,27 @@ def _oauth_router(config) -> APIRouter:
     # ---------------------------------------------------------------
 
     @router.post("/auth/otc/request")
-    async def otc_request(body: OtcRequestBody):
+    async def otc_request(body: OtcRequestBody, request: Request):
+        # v0.12.0 / roadmap item #10: gate the request on a successful
+        # Turnstile siteverify before the bcrypt hash + SMTP send. The
+        # check runs first so a failed challenge spends no rate budget
+        # and produces no envelope. When the operator has not wired the
+        # secret AND TURNSTILE_REQUIRED=false (the default), the gate
+        # opens — see `backend/app/turnstile.py` for the full matrix.
+        client_ip = request.client.host if request.client else None
+        ts = turnstile.verify_token(body.turnstile_token, client_ip=client_ip)
+        if not ts.ok:
+            if ts.reason == "misconfigured":
+                # TURNSTILE_REQUIRED=true but the secret is unset. This
+                # is an operator/config problem, not a client problem;
+                # surface as 500 so the operator notices in their logs
+                # rather than blaming the user's browser.
+                raise HTTPException(500, "auth misconfigured")
+            # missing-token / failed / network → uniform 400 so the
+            # response does not enumerate which leg of the challenge
+            # broke. The reason is in the server logs.
+            raise HTTPException(400, "verification failed")
+
         outcome = otc.request_code(body.email)
         if outcome.reason == "cooldown":
             # Loud failure per the rate-limit primitive — the abuse
@@ -167,11 +277,121 @@ def _oauth_router(config) -> APIRouter:
         return {"ok": True}
 
     @router.post("/auth/otc/verify")
-    async def otc_verify(body: OtcVerifyBody, request: Request):
+    async def otc_verify(body: OtcVerifyBody, request: Request, response: Response):
         result = otc.verify_code(body.email, body.code)
         if not result.ok or result.user is None:
             raise HTTPException(400, "Invalid or expired code")
         auth.store_session(request, result.user)
+        # v0.8.0: surface `needs_profile` so the Login.jsx surface can
+        # decide whether to advance to the first/last/why capture step
+        # or jump straight to "/". `needs_profile=true` iff the user
+        # is `permission_state='pending'` AND the row has no profile
+        # fields yet — a fresh OTC user. Grandfathered users
+        # (`permission_state='granted'`) and pending users who already
+        # captured their fields both read as false.
+        row = db.conn().execute(
+            "SELECT first_name, last_name, beta_request_reason FROM users WHERE id = ?",
+            (result.user.user_id,),
+        ).fetchone()
+        first_name = (row["first_name"] if row else None) or ""
+        last_name = (row["last_name"] if row else None) or ""
+        beta_request_reason = (row["beta_request_reason"] if row else None) or ""
+        needs_profile = (
+            result.user.permission_state == "pending"
+            and not first_name
+            and not last_name
+            and not beta_request_reason
+        )
+        # v0.11.0 — opt-in device trust. The checkbox lives on the
+        # Login.jsx OTC step; when true, the server mints a fresh
+        # device-trust row and sets the long-lived cookie. The cookie
+        # is "essential" per the v0.13.0 consent contract (it is part
+        # of authentication, not analytics) so it lands regardless of
+        # the user's analytics / other-cookies choice. We capture the
+        # User-Agent at issuance so the /settings/devices surface can
+        # render a rough device label.
+        if body.trust_device:
+            ua = request.headers.get("user-agent", "")
+            outcome = device_trust_mod.issue(result.user.user_id, ua)
+            _set_device_trust_cookie(response, outcome.raw_token)
+        return {
+            "ok": True,
+            "user": {
+                "id": result.user.user_id,
+                "display_name": result.user.display_name,
+                "email": result.user.email,
+                "role": result.user.role,
+                "permission_state": result.user.permission_state,
+            },
+            "needs_profile": needs_profile,
+        }
+
+    # ---------------------------------------------------------------
+    # v0.10.0: user-set passcodes after OTC (§6.2, roadmap item #8).
+    #
+    # After a successful OTC sign-in, a contributor may set a passcode
+    # and use email + passcode for subsequent sign-ins. OTC remains the
+    # forgot-passcode fallback — a verify failure beyond 5 consecutive
+    # attempts locks the passcode path for 15 minutes; the OTC path is
+    # unaffected by the lockout.
+    # ---------------------------------------------------------------
+
+    @router.get("/auth/passcode/check")
+    async def passcode_check(email: str = ""):
+        """Does this email have a passcode set? Anonymous endpoint —
+        the Login.jsx flow calls this after the user types their email
+        to decide whether to render a passcode input or fall back to
+        OTC. We surface only the boolean; lockout state, the hash, and
+        the set-at stamp are not leaked here."""
+        status = passcode_mod.passcode_status(email)
+        return {"has_passcode": status.has_passcode}
+
+    @router.post("/auth/passcode/set")
+    async def passcode_set(body: PasscodeSetBody, request: Request):
+        """Set or replace the signed-in user's passcode. Requires an
+        active session (OTC- or passcode-authenticated)."""
+        user = auth.require_user(request)
+        try:
+            passcode_mod.set_passcode(user.user_id, body.passcode)
+        except passcode_mod.PasscodeValidationError as e:
+            raise HTTPException(422, str(e))
+        return {"ok": True}
+
+    @router.delete("/auth/passcode")
+    async def passcode_delete(request: Request):
+        """Remove the signed-in user's passcode. The user is back to
+        OTC-only on next sign-in."""
+        user = auth.require_user(request)
+        passcode_mod.clear_passcode(user.user_id)
+        return {"ok": True}
+
+    @router.post("/auth/passcode/verify")
+    async def passcode_verify(body: PasscodeVerifyBody, request: Request, response: Response):
+        """Sign in with email + passcode. Returns the standard session
+        payload on success; HTTP 423 with `locked_until` when the
+        account is in the lockout window; HTTP 400 for every other
+        failure (the wrong-vs-unknown distinction is intentionally
+        collapsed so a probing client cannot enumerate emails).
+
+        v0.11.0: the body's `trust_device` flag, if true, mints a
+        fresh device-trust row and sets the long-lived cookie. Same
+        opt-in contract as `/auth/otc/verify`."""
+        result = passcode_mod.verify_passcode(body.email, body.passcode)
+        if result.reason == "locked":
+            raise HTTPException(
+                423,
+                {
+                    "detail": "Too many failed attempts; sign in with a one-time code instead",
+                    "locked_until": result.locked_until,
+                },
+            )
+        if not result.ok or result.user is None:
+            raise HTTPException(400, "Invalid passcode")
+        auth.store_session(request, result.user)
+        if body.trust_device:
+            ua = request.headers.get("user-agent", "")
+            outcome = device_trust_mod.issue(result.user.user_id, ua)
+            _set_device_trust_cookie(response, outcome.raw_token)
         return {
             "ok": True,
             "user": {
@@ -182,4 +402,151 @@ def _oauth_router(config) -> APIRouter:
             },
         }
 
+    # ---------------------------------------------------------------
+    # v0.17.0: admin-create user + invite claim (§6.1, roadmap item #16).
+    #
+    # The admin-create surface lives at POST /api/admin/users (see
+    # api_admin.py); this endpoint is the corresponding claim path the
+    # invitee hits when they click the link in their invite email.
+    # The frontend route `/invites/claim?token=…` reads the token from
+    # the URL and POSTs it here.
+    #
+    # The claim itself is the first-sign-in for the invitee: clicking
+    # the unique token in the email is proof of email control per the
+    # roadmap, so this endpoint skips the OTC step entirely on first
+    # sign-in. The session cookie lands; the response tells the
+    # frontend whether to route to passcode-set (if v0.10.0 passcode
+    # flow is in play and the user has not yet set a passcode) or to
+    # home.
+    #
+    # The endpoint is anonymous-reachable: the entire point is to
+    # establish the session, so we do not gate it on `require_user`.
+    # The trust-device opt-in mirrors the v0.11.0 OTC/passcode verify
+    # contract (the body's `trust_device` flag, when true, mints a
+    # fresh device-trust row on the same response so the invitee
+    # lands trusted on their first device).
+    # ---------------------------------------------------------------
+
+    @router.post("/api/invites/claim")
+    async def invites_claim(body: InviteClaimBody, request: Request, response: Response):
+        result = invites_mod.claim(body.token)
+        if result.reason == "expired":
+            # The token's TTL window passed without a claim. HTTP 410
+            # (Gone) so the frontend can render a "this invite has
+            # expired — please contact the admin for a fresh one"
+            # message distinct from the generic invalid-token shape.
+            raise HTTPException(410, "This invite has expired")
+        if result.reason == "claimed":
+            # The token was already consumed. HTTP 410 for the same
+            # reason — the row is dead either way.
+            raise HTTPException(410, "This invite has already been claimed")
+        if not result.ok or result.user is None:
+            # 'unknown' / 'invalid' — the token does not match any
+            # active invite row. HTTP 400 so it reads distinct from
+            # the dead-token shape above.
+            raise HTTPException(400, "Invalid invite token")
+
+        # Establish the session. From here on the invitee is signed
+        # in as the pre-provisioned user row carrying their
+        # pre-assigned role.
+        auth.store_session(request, result.user)
+
+        # v0.11.0 — opt-in device trust on the claim response. Same
+        # contract as OTC/passcode verify: when the body's flag is
+        # true, the server mints a fresh device-trust row and sets
+        # the long-lived cookie, so the invitee skips the email step
+        # on subsequent visits to the same browser.
+        if body.trust_device:
+            ua = request.headers.get("user-agent", "")
+            outcome = device_trust_mod.issue(result.user.user_id, ua)
+            _set_device_trust_cookie(response, outcome.raw_token)
+
+        # Has the user already set a passcode? (Could only happen via
+        # an admin pre-population path that doesn't exist yet, but
+        # the response shape mirrors `/api/auth/me` so the frontend
+        # can read it without a second call.) If `needs_passcode` is
+        # true and v0.10.0 passcode flow is in play, the frontend
+        # routes to /settings/notifications#sign-in to set a passcode
+        # immediately; otherwise it routes to /.
+        row = db.conn().execute(
+            "SELECT passcode_hash FROM users WHERE id = ?",
+            (result.user.user_id,),
+        ).fetchone()
+        has_passcode = bool(row and row["passcode_hash"])
+
+        return {
+            "ok": True,
+            "user": {
+                "id": result.user.user_id,
+                "display_name": result.user.display_name,
+                "email": result.user.email,
+                "role": result.user.role,
+                "permission_state": result.user.permission_state,
+            },
+            # Roadmap §16: the claim flow skips OTC entirely; the
+            # natural next step is passcode-set (so the invitee can
+            # sign back in without needing an email roundtrip on their
+            # second visit). The frontend uses this hint to decide
+            # whether to route to the passcode-set screen or to home.
+            "needs_passcode": not has_passcode,
+        }
+
+    # ---------------------------------------------------------------
+    # v0.11.0: trust device for 30 days (§6.2, roadmap item #9).
+    #
+    # The /auth/device-trust/start endpoint resolves a presented
+    # `rfc_device_trust` cookie. If it matches a non-expired,
+    # non-revoked row, the session is re-established and the client
+    # is told to skip OTC/passcode entry. A stale cookie (expired or
+    # revoked) is cleared on the response. A miss is structurally
+    # silent — the client falls back to the email step.
+    #
+    # The endpoint is anonymous-reachable: a returning visitor with
+    # the cookie hits this before the email step. We do not gate it
+    # on a session because the entire point is to establish one.
+    # ---------------------------------------------------------------
+
+    @router.post("/auth/device-trust/start")
+    async def device_trust_start(request: Request):
+        """Sign in via a presented device-trust cookie.
+
+        On a hit, re-establishes the session in the cookie store and
+        returns a user payload shaped like /auth/otc/verify (minus
+        `needs_profile`, which a returning device-trust user is
+        structurally past — they signed in at least once before).
+        On a miss, returns 401 + clears the stale cookie. An
+        'unknown' miss (cookie present but no row matches) also
+        clears, since the token is dead to the server either way.
+
+        Note on response construction: we return a `JSONResponse`
+        directly rather than raising `HTTPException` on the miss
+        path because FastAPI's exception handler builds a new
+        response from scratch and would drop any `set_cookie` /
+        `delete_cookie` calls. The hand-built `JSONResponse` lets
+        us attach the cookie-clear header alongside the 401.
+        """
+        raw = request.cookies.get(device_trust_mod.COOKIE_NAME, "")
+        if not raw:
+            return JSONResponse({"detail": "No device trust"}, status_code=401)
+        outcome = device_trust_mod.lookup(raw)
+        if not outcome.ok or outcome.user is None:
+            # Clear the stale cookie so subsequent requests don't
+            # keep replaying a dead token. We surface 401 in all
+            # cases so a probing client can't tell "your row was
+            # revoked" from "this token never existed".
+            response = JSONResponse({"detail": "Device trust invalid"}, status_code=401)
+            _clear_device_trust_cookie(response)
+            return response
+        auth.store_session(request, outcome.user)
+        return {
+            "ok": True,
+            "user": {
+                "id": outcome.user.user_id,
+                "display_name": outcome.user.display_name,
+                "email": outcome.user.email,
+                "role": outcome.user.role,
+                "permission_state": outcome.user.permission_state,
+            },
+        }
+
     return router

backend/app/notify.py

@@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ log = logging.getLogger(__name__)
 CATEGORY_PERSONAL = "personal-direct"
 CATEGORY_STRUCTURAL = "structural"
 CATEGORY_CHURN = "churn"
+CATEGORY_ADMIN_ACTIONABLE = "admin-actionable"
 
 # Action kinds whose actor's first interaction with a slug triggers
 # auto-watch per §15.6. The substantive-gesture list in the spec is
@@ -208,6 +209,67 @@ def fan_out_from_action(
             )
 
 
+def fan_out_new_beta_request(
+    *,
+    requester_user_id: int,
+) -> None:
+    """v0.9.0 (roadmap item #7): announce a fresh beta-access request to
+    every admin/owner.
+
+    Called from `POST /api/auth/me/beta-request` after the row's
+    first/last/why fields are populated. Fan-out shape mirrors the §15
+    chokepoint contract: one row per recipient, written via `_emit_one`
+    so the SSE broadcast + email dispatch run through the same surface
+    every other notification uses. The event has no rfc_slug (it is
+    framework-scoped, not RFC-scoped); the deep-link payload points
+    `/admin/users` instead of `/rfc/<slug>`.
+
+    Actor is the requester per §15.9 (the underlying user, never the
+    bot). Category is `admin-actionable` so the §15.4 email gate
+    consults `email_admin_actionable` (owners/admins-only by
+    construction) and the digest exclusion rules treat it identically
+    to other admin-actionable signals (graduation_ready et al).
+
+    Recipients are owners + admins minus the requester themselves
+    (a self-promotion shouldn't reach the requester's own inbox). The
+    requester is never in the role set in practice — the endpoint
+    refuses 'granted'/'revoked' callers and a fresh OTC user lands
+    `contributor`+`pending` — but we filter regardless so the call
+    is robust to future changes in the auth gate.
+    """
+    requester = db.conn().execute(
+        "SELECT first_name, last_name, email, display_name FROM users WHERE id = ?",
+        (requester_user_id,),
+    ).fetchone()
+    if requester is None:
+        return
+    first = (requester["first_name"] or "").strip()
+    last = (requester["last_name"] or "").strip()
+    email = requester["email"] or ""
+    display = requester["display_name"] or email or "a new user"
+    full_name = (f"{first} {last}").strip() or display
+    details = {
+        "requester_user_id": requester_user_id,
+        "requester_first_name": first,
+        "requester_last_name": last,
+        "requester_email": email,
+        "requester_display": full_name,
+    }
+    for recipient_id in _admin_user_ids():
+        if recipient_id == requester_user_id:
+            continue
+        _emit_one(
+            recipient_user_id=recipient_id,
+            event_kind="new_beta_request",
+            category=CATEGORY_ADMIN_ACTIONABLE,
+            actor_user_id=requester_user_id,
+            rfc_slug=None,
+            branch_name=None,
+            pr_number=None,
+            details=details,
+        )
+
+
 def fan_out_chat_message(
     *,
     actor_user_id: int,
@@ -707,6 +769,16 @@ def render_summary(event_kind: str, actor_display: str | None, rfc_title: str |
         return f"{actor} began graduating {title}."
     if event_kind == "pr_conflict_with_main":
         return f"{actor} started a resolution branch on {title}."
+    if event_kind == "new_beta_request":
+        # v0.9.0: framework-scoped, not RFC-scoped. The actor (the
+        # requester) and the captured full name + email read as
+        # one self-contained sentence; the inbox row and the email
+        # body share this text per §15.4.
+        full_name = extras.get("requester_display") or actor
+        email_addr = extras.get("requester_email") or ""
+        if email_addr:
+            return f"New beta-access request from {full_name} ({email_addr})."
+        return f"New beta-access request from {full_name}."
     return f"{event_kind} on {title}"
 
 

backend/app/otc.py

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-"""§6.2 / v0.7.0: email + one-time-code sign-in.
+"""§6.2 / v0.7.0 / v0.8.0: email + one-time-code sign-in.
 
 Replaces the Gitea OAuth gesture as the primary human-auth path. The
 Gitea bot user + token are still needed for server-side git
@@ -25,14 +25,25 @@ The shape:
     `users` row already carries `email` (case-insensitive), it is
     reused — `gitea_id` is left alone so a grandfathered OAuth-era
     user keeps the linker intact. Otherwise a fresh contributor
-    row is provisioned with `gitea_id = NULL`, `gitea_login = NULL`.
+    row is provisioned with `gitea_id = NULL`, `gitea_login = NULL`,
+    and `permission_state = 'pending'` (v0.8.0 — see below).
 
-The endpoints in `main.py` thin-wrap this module. The allowlist gate
-from v0.3.0 is consulted at request time — if `allowed_emails` is
-populated and the requested address isn't on it, the request returns
-202 as usual but no email is sent. This intentionally does not leak
-allowlist state to the caller; the §19.2 candidate for v0.8.0
-replaces this gate with an admin-grant flow.
+The endpoints in `main.py` thin-wrap this module.
+
+v0.8.0 (roadmap item #6) replaces the v0.3.0 `allowed_emails` gate at
+the request surface. The request handler used to silently drop OTC
+requests for emails not on the allowlist; now any valid email
+receives a code. The admission gate moves to `permission_state` on
+the freshly-provisioned `users` row: a fresh user lands in 'pending'
+and waits for an admin grant before write endpoints accept them.
+Read surfaces stay open (the same blast radius v0.6.0 / item #4
+already audited for anonymous viewers).
+
+The `allowed_emails` table itself stays in the schema as a
+fast-path bypass — the admin UI from v0.3.0 continues to manage it,
+and a future release (v0.9.0's admin user-management page) collapses
+the two admission surfaces into one. The OTC request path no
+longer consults the table.
 """
 from __future__ import annotations
 
@@ -44,7 +55,7 @@ from dataclasses import dataclass
 import bcrypt
 
 from . import db
-from .auth import SessionUser, allowlist_is_active
+from .auth import SessionUser
 
 log = logging.getLogger(__name__)
 
@@ -101,25 +112,15 @@ def _check_code(code: str, code_hash: str) -> bool:
         return False
 
 
-# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-# Allowlist gate — shared with the OAuth flow.
-# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-
-def _allowlist_admits(email: str) -> bool:
-    """The same allowlist v0.3.0 introduced for OAuth, applied to OTC
-    requests. If the allowlist is populated and the email is not on it,
-    we still respond 202 to the caller, but no code is sent."""
-    if not allowlist_is_active():
-        return True
-    row = db.conn().execute(
-        "SELECT 1 FROM allowed_emails WHERE email = ? LIMIT 1", (email,)
-    ).fetchone()
-    return row is not None
-
-
 # ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 # Request path
+#
+# v0.8.0: the allowlist gate from v0.7.0 / v0.3.0 is removed here. Any
+# valid email receives a code; the admission gate moved to
+# `permission_state` on the freshly-provisioned `users` row (see
+# `provision_or_link_user`). The `allowed_emails` table stays in the
+# schema (admin UI from v0.3.0 still manages it); v0.9.0's admin
+# user-management page will collapse the two surfaces.
 # ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
 
@@ -127,14 +128,16 @@ def _allowlist_admits(email: str) -> bool:
 class RequestOutcome:
     """The outcome of a `request_code` call.
 
-    `code` is None whenever no code was generated — either because the
-    allowlist denied the email or because the cooldown window blocked
-    the request. The caller (the API endpoint) does not surface this
-    distinction to the user; it returns 202 either way.
+    `code` is None whenever no code was generated — the cooldown
+    window blocked the request or the email was syntactically
+    invalid. The caller (the API endpoint) does not surface the
+    invalid-email shape to the user; it returns 202 either way.
+    The cooldown shape surfaces as a loud 429 per the v0.7.0
+    contract.
     """
     sent: bool
     code: str | None
-    reason: str  # 'sent' | 'allowlist' | 'cooldown' | 'invalid'
+    reason: str  # 'sent' | 'cooldown' | 'invalid'
 
 
 def request_code(email: str) -> RequestOutcome:
@@ -160,13 +163,6 @@ def request_code(email: str) -> RequestOutcome:
         if row is not None:
             return RequestOutcome(sent=False, code=None, reason="cooldown")
 
-    # Allowlist: silently drop the send if the email isn't on the list.
-    # The row is not written either — there's nothing for verify to
-    # match against, so the user-facing experience is "I never got an
-    # email", which is the intended shape for the private-beta gate.
-    if not _allowlist_admits(email):
-        return RequestOutcome(sent=False, code=None, reason="allowlist")
-
     # Invalidate prior unused codes for this email. A re-request is
     # always for the most recent code; older codes are dead.
     db.conn().execute(
@@ -275,12 +271,16 @@ def provision_or_link_user(email: str) -> SessionUser:
       1. An existing row whose email equals (case-insensitive) the
          requested email — the OAuth-era user is grandfathered in via
          this path. `gitea_id` is preserved so a future OAuth round
-         trip still resolves the same row.
+         trip still resolves the same row. `permission_state` is
+         read off the row as-is — grandfathered users come through
+         migration with 'granted' (the column default), so their
+         contributor capabilities are unaffected.
       2. Otherwise: a fresh contributor row with `gitea_id = NULL`,
-         `gitea_login = NULL`. The display name defaults to the local
-         part of the email (everything before the `@`) — users can
-         rename later via the §19.2 first-OTC profile-capture flow
-         that v0.8.0 introduces.
+         `gitea_login = NULL`, and `permission_state = 'pending'`
+         (v0.8.0). The display name defaults to the local part of
+         the email (everything before the `@`); a separate
+         `POST /auth/me/beta-request` call lands first name / last
+         name / "why I want access" on the same row.
 
     The §6.1 owner-zero bootstrap still applies: if the email matches
     the configured `OWNER_GITEA_LOGIN`-derived owner identity, the row
@@ -307,13 +307,19 @@ def provision_or_link_user(email: str) -> SessionUser:
             email=existing["email"] or email,
             avatar_url=existing["avatar_url"] or "",
             role=existing["role"],
+            permission_state=existing["permission_state"] or "granted",
         )
 
     display = email.split("@", 1)[0] or email
+    # v0.8.0: 'pending' is the explicit insert value; the migration
+    # default of 'granted' is what passes grandfathered users
+    # through. A fresh OTC user lands in 'pending' regardless of
+    # what the migration default says, so the gate engages reliably
+    # even if a future migration changes the default.
     cur = db.conn().execute(
         """
-        INSERT INTO users (gitea_id, gitea_login, email, display_name, avatar_url, role)
-        VALUES (NULL, NULL, ?, ?, '', 'contributor')
+        INSERT INTO users (gitea_id, gitea_login, email, display_name, avatar_url, role, permission_state)
+        VALUES (NULL, NULL, ?, ?, '', 'contributor', 'pending')
         """,
         (email, display),
     )
@@ -326,4 +332,5 @@ def provision_or_link_user(email: str) -> SessionUser:
         email=email,
         avatar_url="",
         role="contributor",
+        permission_state="pending",
     )

backend/app/passcode.py

@@ -0,0 +1,367 @@
+"""§6.2 / v0.10.0: user-set passcodes after OTC (roadmap item #8).
+
+After a successful OTC sign-in, a contributor may set a passcode and
+use email + passcode for subsequent sign-ins. OTC remains the fallback
+— a forgotten passcode is recovered by requesting a fresh OTC.
+
+This module is the state machine behind the four `/auth/passcode/*`
+endpoints (`set`, `clear`, `verify`, `check`). The endpoints in
+`main.py` thin-wrap these helpers in the same shape the OTC module
+uses (see `otc.py`).
+
+Shape:
+
+  * `set_passcode(user_id, passcode)` — bcrypt-hash the passcode and
+    write it to `users.passcode_hash` + `users.passcode_set_at`.
+    Validation (length, denylist) happens here, not at the endpoint,
+    so the rule lives in one place. Replaces any prior passcode.
+  * `clear_passcode(user_id)` — null out `passcode_hash` and
+    `passcode_set_at`. The user is back to OTC-only.
+  * `verify_passcode(email, passcode)` — locate the user by email,
+    check lockout, compare via bcrypt, manage the failure counter,
+    and return a populated `SessionUser` on success.
+  * `passcode_status(email)` — does this email have a passcode set?
+    Used by the `/auth/passcode/check` endpoint that the Login.jsx
+    flow consults after the user types their email.
+
+Lockout is a v1 shape: 5 consecutive failures sets
+`passcode_locked_until` to `now + 15 minutes`, after which a verify
+attempt that lands inside the window returns HTTP 423. The OTC path
+is unaffected by the lockout — a user can request and verify a fresh
+OTC to sign in while their passcode is locked out, and `verify_code`
+in `otc.py` does not consult these columns.
+
+The lockout window and the failure threshold are hard-coded here.
+Tuning them via env vars (or moving to per-IP rate-limiting) is a
+§19.2 candidate; see SPEC §19.2.
+"""
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import logging
+from dataclasses import dataclass
+
+import bcrypt
+
+from . import db
+from .auth import SessionUser
+
+log = logging.getLogger(__name__)
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Tunables — intentionally hard-coded in v0.10.0 (see module docstring).
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+LOCKOUT_AFTER_FAILED_ATTEMPTS = 5
+LOCKOUT_DURATION_MINUTES = 15
+
+PASSCODE_MIN_LENGTH = 4
+PASSCODE_MAX_LENGTH = 20
+
+# A small denylist of patterns we never want a passcode to be. The
+# rule is "no obvious patterns"; the list is deliberately small —
+# every entry here is a verbatim string match. A heavier check
+# (sequential digits, single-character runs of length >= N, etc.)
+# is a §19.2 candidate.
+PASSCODE_DENYLIST: frozenset[str] = frozenset(
+    {
+        "0000",
+        "1111",
+        "2222",
+        "3333",
+        "4444",
+        "5555",
+        "6666",
+        "7777",
+        "8888",
+        "9999",
+        "1234",
+        "12345",
+        "123456",
+        "1234567",
+        "12345678",
+        "123456789",
+        "1234567890",
+        "0123",
+        "01234",
+        "012345",
+        "0123456",
+        "01234567",
+        "012345678",
+        "0123456789",
+        "abcd",
+        "abcde",
+        "abcdef",
+        "qwer",
+        "qwerty",
+        "asdf",
+        "asdfg",
+        "asdfgh",
+        "aaaa",
+        "bbbb",
+        "cccc",
+        "password",
+        "letmein",
+    }
+)
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Validation
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+class PasscodeValidationError(Exception):
+    """The proposed passcode failed validation. The endpoint surface
+    maps this to HTTP 422 with the message intact."""
+
+
+def _validate(passcode: str) -> str:
+    """Return the normalized passcode (stripped) or raise.
+
+    Rules:
+      * 4-20 characters after stripping leading/trailing whitespace.
+      * Not on the small denylist of obvious patterns.
+
+    No character-class restriction beyond that — the spec says
+    "numeric PIN or short alphanumeric"; we don't refuse other
+    characters because the entropy isn't load-bearing (the per-account
+    lockout is what carries the security weight, mirroring the OTC
+    shape from v0.7.0).
+    """
+    pc = (passcode or "").strip()
+    if not pc:
+        raise PasscodeValidationError("Passcode is required")
+    if len(pc) < PASSCODE_MIN_LENGTH:
+        raise PasscodeValidationError(
+            f"Passcode must be at least {PASSCODE_MIN_LENGTH} characters"
+        )
+    if len(pc) > PASSCODE_MAX_LENGTH:
+        raise PasscodeValidationError(
+            f"Passcode must be at most {PASSCODE_MAX_LENGTH} characters"
+        )
+    if pc.lower() in PASSCODE_DENYLIST:
+        raise PasscodeValidationError("Passcode is too common; pick something less obvious")
+    return pc
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Hashing
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+def _hash(passcode: str) -> str:
+    return bcrypt.hashpw(passcode.encode("utf-8"), bcrypt.gensalt()).decode("ascii")
+
+
+def _check(passcode: str, passcode_hash: str) -> bool:
+    try:
+        return bcrypt.checkpw(passcode.encode("utf-8"), passcode_hash.encode("ascii"))
+    except (ValueError, TypeError):
+        return False
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Set / clear
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+def set_passcode(user_id: int, passcode: str) -> None:
+    """Hash and store the passcode. Replaces any prior passcode on the
+    same row; clears the failure counter and lockout (a user setting a
+    fresh passcode is implicitly re-authenticating their account)."""
+    pc = _validate(passcode)
+    h = _hash(pc)
+    db.conn().execute(
+        """
+        UPDATE users
+           SET passcode_hash = ?,
+               passcode_set_at = datetime('now'),
+               passcode_failed_attempts = 0,
+               passcode_locked_until = NULL
+         WHERE id = ?
+        """,
+        (h, user_id),
+    )
+
+
+def clear_passcode(user_id: int) -> None:
+    """Remove the passcode. The user is back to OTC-only on next sign-in."""
+    db.conn().execute(
+        """
+        UPDATE users
+           SET passcode_hash = NULL,
+               passcode_set_at = NULL,
+               passcode_failed_attempts = 0,
+               passcode_locked_until = NULL
+         WHERE id = ?
+        """,
+        (user_id,),
+    )
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Check (status surface for the Login.jsx flow)
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+@dataclass
+class PasscodeStatus:
+    """The shape `/auth/passcode/check` returns.
+
+    `has_passcode` is the only signal the frontend needs to decide
+    whether to show a passcode input or an OTC request step. We do
+    not leak the hash, the set-at timestamp, or the lockout state —
+    a probing client that wants to know "is this account locked
+    out" can attempt a verify and read the 423.
+    """
+    has_passcode: bool
+
+
+def passcode_status(email: str) -> PasscodeStatus:
+    email = (email or "").strip()
+    if not email or "@" not in email:
+        return PasscodeStatus(has_passcode=False)
+    row = db.conn().execute(
+        "SELECT passcode_hash FROM users WHERE email = ? COLLATE NOCASE",
+        (email,),
+    ).fetchone()
+    if row is None:
+        return PasscodeStatus(has_passcode=False)
+    return PasscodeStatus(has_passcode=bool(row["passcode_hash"]))
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Verify
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+@dataclass
+class VerifyOutcome:
+    """Result of a `verify_passcode` call.
+
+    `reason` distinguishes the failure modes the endpoint surfaces as
+    distinct HTTP shapes:
+      * 'ok'        — populated `user`, HTTP 200.
+      * 'unknown'   — no user with this email, HTTP 400 (generic).
+      * 'no_passcode' — user exists but never set a passcode, HTTP 400
+        (the frontend should fall back to OTC).
+      * 'locked'    — user is currently in the lockout window, HTTP
+        423. `locked_until` carries the ISO-8601 stamp for the client.
+      * 'wrong'     — passcode didn't match. HTTP 400. If the failure
+        crossed the lockout threshold the row is now locked; the
+        endpoint surfaces this as a fresh `locked` response on the
+        next attempt rather than collapsing the two states here.
+    """
+    ok: bool
+    user: SessionUser | None
+    reason: str
+    locked_until: str | None = None
+
+
+def verify_passcode(email: str, passcode: str) -> VerifyOutcome:
+    email = (email or "").strip()
+    passcode = (passcode or "").strip()
+    if not email or not passcode:
+        return VerifyOutcome(ok=False, user=None, reason="unknown")
+
+    row = db.conn().execute(
+        """
+        SELECT id, gitea_id, gitea_login, email, display_name, avatar_url, role,
+               passcode_hash, passcode_failed_attempts, passcode_locked_until
+          FROM users
+         WHERE email = ? COLLATE NOCASE
+        """,
+        (email,),
+    ).fetchone()
+    if row is None:
+        return VerifyOutcome(ok=False, user=None, reason="unknown")
+    if not row["passcode_hash"]:
+        return VerifyOutcome(ok=False, user=None, reason="no_passcode")
+
+    # Lockout check: if `passcode_locked_until` is populated and in the
+    # future, the verify is refused without touching the hash. Once the
+    # window has elapsed we let the verify proceed; the failed-attempts
+    # counter is also reset so the user gets a fresh 5-attempt budget.
+    locked_until = row["passcode_locked_until"]
+    if locked_until:
+        still_locked = db.conn().execute(
+            "SELECT datetime(?) > datetime('now') AS still_locked",
+            (locked_until,),
+        ).fetchone()["still_locked"]
+        if still_locked:
+            return VerifyOutcome(
+                ok=False,
+                user=None,
+                reason="locked",
+                locked_until=locked_until,
+            )
+        # Lockout expired — clear the counter so the next failure starts
+        # from zero, and continue with the verify.
+        db.conn().execute(
+            """
+            UPDATE users
+               SET passcode_failed_attempts = 0,
+                   passcode_locked_until = NULL
+             WHERE id = ?
+            """,
+            (row["id"],),
+        )
+
+    if _check(passcode, row["passcode_hash"]):
+        # Success: clear the counter (a single success wipes the
+        # accumulated failures — the threshold tracks *consecutive*
+        # failures).
+        db.conn().execute(
+            """
+            UPDATE users
+               SET passcode_failed_attempts = 0,
+                   passcode_locked_until = NULL,
+                   last_seen_at = datetime('now')
+             WHERE id = ?
+            """,
+            (row["id"],),
+        )
+        return VerifyOutcome(
+            ok=True,
+            user=SessionUser(
+                user_id=row["id"],
+                gitea_id=row["gitea_id"] or 0,
+                gitea_login=row["gitea_login"] or "",
+                display_name=row["display_name"],
+                email=row["email"] or email,
+                avatar_url=row["avatar_url"] or "",
+                role=row["role"],
+            ),
+            reason="ok",
+        )
+
+    # Failure: increment the counter. If this push crosses the
+    # threshold, stamp the lockout. The next verify attempt against
+    # the same row returns 423 with the `locked_until` stamp.
+    next_count = (row["passcode_failed_attempts"] or 0) + 1
+    if next_count >= LOCKOUT_AFTER_FAILED_ATTEMPTS:
+        db.conn().execute(
+            f"""
+            UPDATE users
+               SET passcode_failed_attempts = ?,
+                   passcode_locked_until = datetime('now', '+{LOCKOUT_DURATION_MINUTES} minutes')
+             WHERE id = ?
+            """,
+            (next_count, row["id"]),
+        )
+        new_locked_until = db.conn().execute(
+            "SELECT passcode_locked_until FROM users WHERE id = ?",
+            (row["id"],),
+        ).fetchone()["passcode_locked_until"]
+        return VerifyOutcome(
+            ok=False,
+            user=None,
+            reason="locked",
+            locked_until=new_locked_until,
+        )
+    db.conn().execute(
+        "UPDATE users SET passcode_failed_attempts = ? WHERE id = ?",
+        (next_count, row["id"]),
+    )
+    return VerifyOutcome(ok=False, user=None, reason="wrong")

backend/app/turnstile.py

@@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
+"""§6.2 / v0.12.0 / roadmap item #10: CloudFlare Turnstile siteverify.
+
+The OTC request endpoint (`/auth/otc/request`) is the abuse hot path
+of the auth surface since v0.7.0 — the per-email cooldown stops the
+trivial back-to-back loop, but it does not stop a distributed scraper
+that fans out across a large invitee list to harvest the "this email
+is admitted vs. this email is not" signal indirectly (timing
+differences, SMTP bounce-rate observation). v0.12.0 gates the request
+endpoint behind a one-step browser-side Turnstile challenge before the
+bcrypt hash + SMTP send.
+
+Stateless: no DB writes, no schema change. The siteverify call to
+CloudFlare lives entirely in this module; the endpoint handler in
+`main.py` thin-wraps `verify_token`.
+
+Tunables (read at call time so tests can monkeypatch):
+
+  * `CLOUDFLARE_TURNSTILE_SECRET`  — the operator-provisioned secret
+    key from the Turnstile dashboard. Lives in GCP Secret Manager in
+    production; absent in tests (which monkeypatch the siteverify
+    transport). When unset, the behavior depends on `TURNSTILE_REQUIRED`:
+      - `TURNSTILE_REQUIRED=true`  → fail closed (`misconfigured`).
+      - `TURNSTILE_REQUIRED=false` (default) → skip verification entirely
+        and admit the request. This is the dev/test path and the
+        "operator hasn't wired the secret yet" path; production
+        deployments **should** set `TURNSTILE_REQUIRED=true` once the
+        secret is in place so a regression in the secret wiring fails
+        loudly instead of silently disabling abuse defense.
+
+  * `TURNSTILE_REQUIRED`           — `true` / `false` (default `false`).
+    When `false` and the secret is absent, the gate is open. When
+    `true` and the secret is absent, the endpoint refuses with a
+    misconfigured-auth shape rather than silently letting requests
+    through.
+
+  * `TURNSTILE_SITEVERIFY_URL`     — points at the real CloudFlare
+    endpoint by default. Override in tests to redirect at a mock
+    URL when `httpx.MockTransport` isn't ergonomic for the case.
+
+The siteverify contract is documented at
+https://developers.cloudflare.com/turnstile/get-started/server-side-validation/.
+We POST `secret` + `response` (and optionally `remoteip`) as form
+fields and read back `{"success": true|false, ...}`. Any network /
+parse failure on the siteverify call is treated as a verification
+failure (`network`) — the abuse path is to skip the challenge, so
+"can't reach CloudFlare" defaults to "refuse the request" when
+`TURNSTILE_REQUIRED=true`, and "admit" when `TURNSTILE_REQUIRED=false`.
+"""
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import logging
+import os
+from dataclasses import dataclass
+
+import httpx
+
+log = logging.getLogger(__name__)
+
+
+SITEVERIFY_URL = "https://challenges.cloudflare.com/turnstile/v0/siteverify"
+
+
+def _secret() -> str:
+    return os.environ.get("CLOUDFLARE_TURNSTILE_SECRET", "").strip()
+
+
+def _required() -> bool:
+    raw = os.environ.get("TURNSTILE_REQUIRED", "").strip().lower()
+    return raw in ("1", "true", "yes", "on")
+
+
+def _siteverify_url() -> str:
+    return os.environ.get("TURNSTILE_SITEVERIFY_URL", "").strip() or SITEVERIFY_URL
+
+
+@dataclass
+class VerifyOutcome:
+    """Result of a Turnstile siteverify call.
+
+    `ok`: the request **may proceed**. True both for "siteverify said
+    success" and for "no secret configured AND not required" (the
+    dev/test soft-fail path).
+
+    `reason`: one of
+      * 'ok'             — siteverify returned success.
+      * 'skipped'        — no secret configured, TURNSTILE_REQUIRED=false.
+                            The gate is open; the endpoint admits the request.
+      * 'misconfigured'  — TURNSTILE_REQUIRED=true but no secret in env.
+                            The endpoint fails closed with 500.
+      * 'missing-token'  — the client did not send a token at all and
+                            verification is required.
+      * 'failed'         — siteverify returned success=false. The
+                            endpoint refuses with 400.
+      * 'network'        — siteverify call raised. Treated as a failure
+                            under TURNSTILE_REQUIRED=true.
+    """
+    ok: bool
+    reason: str
+
+
+def verify_token(token: str | None, *, client_ip: str | None = None) -> VerifyOutcome:
+    """Validate a Turnstile token against CloudFlare's siteverify endpoint.
+
+    Returns a VerifyOutcome describing whether the calling endpoint
+    should proceed. The endpoint maps `ok=False` to an HTTP status per
+    the `reason`:
+
+      * 'misconfigured' → 500 "auth misconfigured"
+      * 'missing-token' / 'failed' / 'network' → 400 "verification failed"
+
+    Tests monkeypatch `httpx.post` (or set `TURNSTILE_SITEVERIFY_URL`
+    + a MockTransport client) to avoid touching the real CloudFlare
+    endpoint. No real keys are ever embedded in tests.
+    """
+    secret = _secret()
+    required = _required()
+
+    if not secret:
+        if required:
+            log.warning("Turnstile required but CLOUDFLARE_TURNSTILE_SECRET is unset; failing closed")
+            return VerifyOutcome(ok=False, reason="misconfigured")
+        # Dev/test/soft-fail path: no secret, not required → gate is open.
+        return VerifyOutcome(ok=True, reason="skipped")
+
+    if not token or not token.strip():
+        # Secret is set, so verification is in force. A missing token
+        # is a hard refuse — the frontend should have rendered the
+        # widget and collected one.
+        return VerifyOutcome(ok=False, reason="missing-token")
+
+    data = {"secret": secret, "response": token.strip()}
+    if client_ip:
+        data["remoteip"] = client_ip
+
+    try:
+        response = httpx.post(_siteverify_url(), data=data, timeout=10.0)
+        payload = response.json()
+    except Exception as exc:  # network, JSON parse, etc.
+        log.warning("Turnstile siteverify call failed: %s", exc)
+        return VerifyOutcome(ok=False, reason="network")
+
+    if payload.get("success") is True:
+        return VerifyOutcome(ok=True, reason="ok")
+
+    # `error-codes` is a list of strings on failure; we log the codes
+    # for the operator without surfacing them to the client.
+    log.info("Turnstile siteverify rejected token: %s", payload.get("error-codes"))
+    return VerifyOutcome(ok=False, reason="failed")

backend/migrations/014_beta_access.sql

@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
+-- §6.1 / §6.2 / §14.1 / v0.8.0: open beta-access request flow (roadmap item #6).
+--
+-- This release replaces v0.3.0's `allowed_emails` allowlist as the
+-- admission control. Anyone with a valid email can sign in via the
+-- v0.7.0 OTC flow; a fresh user lands in `permission_state='pending'`
+-- until an admin grants access. The first-OTC flow captures three
+-- profile fields (first name, last name, free-text "why I should be
+-- included in the beta") that the admin sees when triaging the
+-- request queue. The `allowed_emails` table stays in the schema as a
+-- fast-path bypass — populated rows are still readable by the
+-- existing admin UI; the OTC `/request` handler no longer consults
+-- it. v0.9.0's admin user-management page will replace the
+-- allowlist UI entirely.
+--
+-- Schema additions:
+--
+--   * `permission_state` — three-state CHECK: 'pending' | 'granted' |
+--     'revoked'. Default 'granted' so every row at migration time
+--     passes through unaffected; only newly provisioned OTC users
+--     land in 'pending' (the OTC verify path sets the column
+--     explicitly on a fresh row, per `app/otc.py`). 'revoked' is the
+--     admin gesture for an account that earned a grant then later
+--     lost it; v0.8.0 doesn't surface a revoke UI, but the schema
+--     slot is here so v0.9.0's admin user-management page can flip
+--     the column without another migration.
+--
+--   * `first_name`, `last_name` — nullable TEXT. Captured on the
+--     first OTC sign-in via `POST /auth/me/beta-request`. Existing
+--     rows (OAuth-era users, OTC users provisioned in v0.7.0) carry
+--     NULL through the migration; the admin queue treats an
+--     unpopulated capture as "auto-grandfathered" since the row's
+--     `permission_state` is already 'granted'.
+--
+--   * `beta_request_reason` — nullable TEXT. The free-text "why I
+--     should be included" from the capture form. Bounded to ~4000
+--     chars at the endpoint layer (no DB-level constraint —
+--     SQLite's TEXT is unbounded).
+--
+--   * `permission_decided_by` — nullable INTEGER. The `users.id` of
+--     the admin who flipped `permission_state` from 'pending' to
+--     'granted' (or 'granted' to 'revoked'). NULL for grandfathered
+--     rows (they were never decided — they passed through at
+--     migration). ON DELETE SET NULL because losing the admin row
+--     should not cascade-delete the user whose access they granted.
+--
+--   * `permission_decided_at` — nullable TEXT timestamp (ISO 8601,
+--     same shape as the existing `created_at` / `last_seen_at`).
+--     Co-populated with `permission_decided_by` on each decision.
+--
+-- Grandfathered-row invariant:
+--
+--   Every row that exists at migration time has
+--   `permission_state='granted'` and `permission_decided_by=NULL`
+--   (the column default + NULL preservation). v0.8.0's auth gate
+--   reads `permission_state='granted'` as the admission check, so
+--   no existing user is locked out by the upgrade. v0.7.0's OTC
+--   path is patched in the same release to set
+--   `permission_state='pending'` explicitly on a fresh row, so the
+--   gate engages only for users provisioned after the upgrade.
+
+ALTER TABLE users ADD COLUMN permission_state TEXT NOT NULL DEFAULT 'granted'
+    CHECK (permission_state IN ('pending', 'granted', 'revoked'));
+
+ALTER TABLE users ADD COLUMN first_name TEXT;
+ALTER TABLE users ADD COLUMN last_name TEXT;
+ALTER TABLE users ADD COLUMN beta_request_reason TEXT;
+
+ALTER TABLE users ADD COLUMN permission_decided_by INTEGER
+    REFERENCES users(id) ON DELETE SET NULL;
+ALTER TABLE users ADD COLUMN permission_decided_at TEXT;
+
+-- Index for the v0.9.0 admin queue: list pending requests ordered by
+-- when the user's row was created (the implicit "request received at"
+-- timestamp, since v0.8.0 sets pending at the same moment as the row
+-- itself is inserted via the OTC verify path).
+CREATE INDEX idx_users_permission_state ON users (permission_state);

backend/migrations/015_passcode.sql

@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+-- §6.2 / v0.10.0: user-set passcodes after OTC (roadmap item #8).
+--
+-- After a successful OTC sign-in, a contributor may set a passcode
+-- (numeric PIN or short alphanumeric). Subsequent sign-ins on the same
+-- account can use email + passcode instead of email + OTC. OTC remains
+-- the structural fallback — a forgotten passcode is recovered by
+-- requesting a fresh OTC and signing in via that path. Per-account
+-- lockout after 5 consecutive verify failures redirects the user to
+-- the OTC path for 15 minutes; the OTC path itself is unaffected by
+-- the passcode lockout (a locked-out user can still receive a fresh
+-- code and sign in).
+--
+-- The columns are additive to the `users` table from `012_otc.sql`.
+-- v0.8.0's `permission_state` column (roadmap item #6) lands in the
+-- driver's integration order ahead of this migration; we do not touch
+-- that column here. v0.7.0's nullable-`gitea_id`/`gitea_login` shape
+-- is preserved verbatim.
+--
+-- Storage shape:
+--
+--   * `passcode_hash` (nullable) — bcrypt hash of the passcode.
+--     NULL means "no passcode set"; the user is OTC-only.
+--   * `passcode_set_at` (nullable) — timestamp of the most recent
+--     `passcode/set` call. Updated when a passcode is set or
+--     replaced; cleared when the passcode is removed.
+--   * `passcode_failed_attempts` — count of consecutive failed
+--     verify attempts since the last successful verify (or since
+--     the lockout cleared). Resets to 0 on success and on lockout
+--     expiry. Defaults to 0 so existing rows post-migration are
+--     not implicitly half-locked.
+--   * `passcode_locked_until` (nullable) — if populated and the
+--     timestamp is in the future, passcode verify is refused with
+--     HTTP 423. Cleared on successful verify after the window
+--     expires, or by the operator via direct DB intervention if
+--     ever needed (no admin endpoint surfaces this in v1).
+--
+-- v0.10.0 introduces no new env vars. The lockout window (5 attempts,
+-- 15 minutes) is hard-coded in `backend/app/passcode.py`; raising or
+-- lowering it is a future-§19.2 candidate. Passcode hashing reuses
+-- the bcrypt dependency added in v0.7.0 for OTC; no new secret is
+-- required (the existing `SECRET_KEY` continues to sign sessions).
+--
+-- Note on SQLite: ALTER TABLE ... ADD COLUMN is supported, so this
+-- migration does not need the rebuild dance that `012_otc.sql`
+-- required. The runner wraps each file in a single BEGIN/COMMIT
+-- block — see `backend/app/db.py` — so either every ADD COLUMN
+-- here lands or none do.
+
+ALTER TABLE users ADD COLUMN passcode_hash TEXT;
+ALTER TABLE users ADD COLUMN passcode_set_at TEXT;
+ALTER TABLE users ADD COLUMN passcode_failed_attempts INTEGER NOT NULL DEFAULT 0;
+ALTER TABLE users ADD COLUMN passcode_locked_until TEXT;

backend/migrations/017_device_trust.sql

@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+-- §6.2 / v0.11.0: trust device for 30 days (roadmap item #9).
+--
+-- After a successful OTC or passcode sign-in, the user can check
+-- "trust this device for 30 days." The framework then issues a
+-- server-issued opaque device-trust token, stores its hash on this
+-- table, and sets a long-lived HttpOnly + Secure + SameSite=Lax
+-- cookie carrying the raw token. On a subsequent visit, the cookie is
+-- presented at `/auth/device-trust/start`; if the server can match the
+-- hash to a non-expired non-revoked row, the user is signed in without
+-- another OTC / passcode round-trip.
+--
+-- v0.11.0 introduces no new env vars. The 30-day window is hard-coded
+-- in `backend/app/device_trust.py`; raising or lowering it (or making
+-- it user-selectable) is a §19.2 candidate, alongside the cross-device
+-- session-revocation surface this table will eventually share with the
+-- v0.10.0 passcode-lockout shape (see SPEC §19.2 / SESSIONS-AND-DEVICES).
+--
+-- Storage shape:
+--
+--   * `id` — surrogate key. Lets the revoke-device UI address a single
+--     row by id without leaking the token shape.
+--   * `user_id` — FK into users(id) with cascade on delete. A deleted
+--     user automatically loses every trusted device.
+--   * `device_token_hash` — bcrypt hash of the random opaque token
+--     issued at trust-time. The raw token only ever lives in the
+--     outbound `Set-Cookie` header and the inbound `Cookie` header;
+--     server-side storage is the hash, so a DB compromise does not
+--     hand attackers a stash of valid device tokens.
+--   * `created_at` — when the row was issued.
+--   * `expires_at` — `created_at + 30 days`. A row past this timestamp
+--     is dead; the lookup path refuses it without further checks.
+--   * `user_agent` — the User-Agent header captured at issuance.
+--     Stored verbatim (truncated to 1024 chars at the application
+--     layer) so the revoke-device UI can show a rough device label.
+--     Not used for any auth decision — purely a hint to the user
+--     reviewing their device list.
+--   * `last_seen_at` — refreshed every time the row authenticates a
+--     request. Lets the revoke-device UI surface "last used 3 days
+--     ago" so the user can tell which row corresponds to which
+--     device.
+--   * `revoked_at` — NULL means active; non-NULL stamps when the user
+--     (or admin) revoked the row. Lookups treat any non-NULL value
+--     as "this row is dead" without consulting the expiry; the
+--     revoke gesture is intentionally one-way (a revoked device must
+--     re-trust to come back online).
+--
+-- Indexing: a unique index on `device_token_hash` so collisions are
+-- detectable at insert time (the token space is 256 bits of CSPRNG
+-- entropy, so a collision is structurally impossible, but the
+-- declaration documents the invariant). A separate index on
+-- `(user_id, revoked_at)` so the revoke-device UI's list query is
+-- a covering walk.
+--
+-- The bcrypt dependency reused here was added in v0.7.0 for OTC and
+-- extended in v0.10.0 for passcodes; v0.11.0 needs no new dep.
+--
+-- The cookie shape: `rfc_device_trust` carries the raw token,
+-- HttpOnly, Secure, SameSite=Lax, Max-Age=2592000 (30 days). It is
+-- "essential" per the v0.13.0 cookie-consent banner (it is part of
+-- authentication, not analytics), so it is set regardless of the
+-- user's analytics / other-cookies choices.
+
+CREATE TABLE device_trust (
+    id                  INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,
+    user_id             INTEGER NOT NULL REFERENCES users(id) ON DELETE CASCADE,
+    device_token_hash   TEXT NOT NULL,
+    created_at          TEXT NOT NULL DEFAULT (datetime('now')),
+    expires_at          TEXT NOT NULL,
+    user_agent          TEXT NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
+    last_seen_at        TEXT NOT NULL DEFAULT (datetime('now')),
+    revoked_at          TEXT
+);
+
+CREATE UNIQUE INDEX idx_device_trust_token_hash ON device_trust (device_token_hash);
+CREATE INDEX idx_device_trust_user ON device_trust (user_id, revoked_at);

backend/migrations/018_rfc_invitations.sql

@@ -0,0 +1,177 @@
+-- §6 / §10 / v0.16.0: owner-only invite for per-RFC contribution +
+-- discussion (roadmap item #12).
+--
+-- Distinct from a platform-level grant (`users.permission_state`,
+-- v0.8.0 / item #6). This row is per-RFC membership: the RFC's owner
+-- invites a specific email to either open PRs against that RFC
+-- (`role_in_rfc='contributor'`) or to participate in the RFC's PR-less
+-- discussion only (`role_in_rfc='discussant'`). Non-invited users keep
+-- the v0.6.0 anonymous-read contract — they can read but cannot
+-- write/discuss that specific RFC.
+--
+-- Coordinates with item #16's parallel work this wave: that item
+-- adds platform-wide invitation tokens; this one adds per-RFC
+-- collaboration rows. To avoid table-name + concept collisions the
+-- two surfaces are scoped distinctly — this migration owns slot 018
+-- and names everything `rfc_*` (RFC-scoped); #16 will use a later
+-- slot and name its tables under a different prefix (`invite_tokens`
+-- or similar) at the user/platform level.
+--
+-- Tables in this migration:
+--
+--   * `rfc_invitations` — one row per (rfc, invitee_email) invite
+--     issued by the RFC's owner. Carries the role-in-RFC the
+--     invitation grants, the opaque token the email link encodes,
+--     the lifecycle state, and the audit trail (who invited, when
+--     accepted, by which user_id if any).
+--
+--   * `rfc_collaborators` — one row per (rfc, user_id, role_in_rfc)
+--     after an invitation is accepted. This is the table the
+--     write-gate consults: "is the viewer named here for this RFC?"
+--     Separating the two means the invitation row carries the
+--     issue/accept lifecycle while the collaborator row is the
+--     compact membership-check substrate. A grant via collaborator
+--     can exist independently of a live invitation (admin-only
+--     direct insert is a §19.2 candidate; v0.16.0 only writes
+--     collaborator rows via the accept path).
+--
+-- Authorization model the application layer enforces on top of these
+-- rows (not encoded in SQL — the schema is just storage):
+--
+--   * Writes (open PR, post discussion message, open discussion
+--     thread) to an RFC require ONE of:
+--       (a) the viewer is named in this RFC's `rfc_collaborators`
+--           with the appropriate role_in_rfc, OR
+--       (b) the viewer holds a globally privileged role (admin,
+--           owner of the platform) per the existing §6 helpers, OR
+--       (c) the viewer is named in the RFC's frontmatter owners
+--           list (the §6 RFC-owner concept, which already grants
+--           the maximal per-RFC capability).
+--
+--   * Reads remain on the v0.6.0 anonymous-read contract — anyone
+--     can read any non-withdrawn RFC. Item #12 does not narrow this.
+--
+--   * Only the RFC's owner (per `cached_rfcs.owners_json`) can
+--     invite. App admins/owners also can (they have the maximal
+--     per-RFC capability by construction).
+--
+-- Storage shape — `rfc_invitations`:
+--
+--   * `id` — surrogate key; the revoke-by-id surface addresses a
+--     single row without leaking the token shape.
+--
+--   * `rfc_slug` — TEXT NOT NULL; the RFC the invitation scopes to.
+--     We FK against `cached_rfcs(slug)` so a withdrawn/deleted RFC
+--     cascades its invitations away cleanly. The §4 cache contract
+--     says cached_rfcs is rebuildable from Gitea; per the same
+--     contract, invitations are app-truth (no Git substrate), so
+--     the cascade is the right direction.
+--
+--   * `inviter_user_id` — the owner who issued the invite. ON
+--     DELETE SET NULL because losing the inviter's user row should
+--     not cascade-delete invitations they sent (the row stays as
+--     audit; the UI renders "by (deleted user)" the same way the
+--     audit log does for orphaned actors).
+--
+--   * `invitee_email` — TEXT NOT NULL; the email the invitation
+--     was sent to. Stored verbatim (case-preserved) so the email
+--     body can address the invitee in their original shape; the
+--     accept path matches case-insensitively.
+--
+--   * `role_in_rfc` — CHECK in {'contributor' | 'discussant'}.
+--     `contributor` lets the user open PRs against the RFC AND
+--     post in its discussion (PR-permission strictly includes
+--     discussion-permission); `discussant` only lets them post
+--     in discussion. Future roles (e.g., 'arbiter') would be
+--     additions; v0.16.0 ships the two.
+--
+--   * `status` — CHECK in {'pending' | 'accepted' | 'revoked' |
+--     'expired'}. Default 'pending'. `accepted` flips on the
+--     accept endpoint; `revoked` on the owner's revoke gesture;
+--     `expired` lazily on read (the accept endpoint refuses a
+--     row whose expires_at has passed, regardless of the column
+--     value).
+--
+--   * `token` — opaque high-entropy string the email link
+--     encodes. Stored verbatim (not hashed) because the
+--     invitation token is single-use and lower-stakes than a
+--     session token: it grants per-RFC role only, and is bounded
+--     by expires_at. Hashing the token here is a §19.2 candidate
+--     if/when the threat model demands it. UNIQUE so the accept
+--     path is a single-row lookup.
+--
+--   * `expires_at` — TEXT timestamp. Set to `created_at + 30 days`
+--     at insert time by the application layer. Accept refuses past
+--     this point; the row can still be revoked or re-issued.
+--
+--   * `created_at` — when the invitation was issued.
+--
+--   * `accepted_at` — when the invitee accepted (NULL until then).
+--
+--   * `accepted_by_user_id` — the user row that accepted. NULL
+--     until acceptance. On a fresh email (no platform user yet)
+--     the accept endpoint requires the invitee to sign in first
+--     via the v0.7.0 OTC path; that path provisions the user row,
+--     after which the accept call lands the user_id here.
+--
+-- Indexing:
+--
+--   * UNIQUE on `token` so the accept lookup is a primary-key-shape
+--     hit and accidental collisions are detectable at insert time.
+--   * (rfc_slug, status) for the owner's "list pending/accepted for
+--     this RFC" surface — the most frequent query.
+--   * (invitee_email, status) for a future cross-RFC "show me my
+--     pending invites" inbox; v0.16.0 doesn't ship that surface but
+--     the index slot is cheap and aligned with the data shape.
+--
+-- Storage shape — `rfc_collaborators`:
+--
+--   * `id` — surrogate key.
+--   * `rfc_slug` — TEXT NOT NULL FK cached_rfcs(slug) ON DELETE CASCADE.
+--   * `user_id` — INTEGER NOT NULL FK users(id) ON DELETE CASCADE.
+--     A deleted user loses every per-RFC role automatically (mirrors
+--     the device_trust / passcode cascade shape).
+--   * `role_in_rfc` — same CHECK as the invitation table.
+--   * `invitation_id` — INTEGER FK rfc_invitations(id) ON DELETE
+--     SET NULL. Audit pointer to the row that minted this
+--     collaborator; NULL is allowed so a future admin-direct grant
+--     path (a §19.2 candidate) can mint a collaborator with no
+--     originating invitation. v0.16.0 always populates this.
+--   * `created_at` — when the collaborator row was minted.
+--
+-- Indexing on collaborators:
+--   * UNIQUE on (rfc_slug, user_id) — a single user can hold at most
+--     one role per RFC. Re-accepting an invitation upgrades the row
+--     (discussant → contributor) but never duplicates.
+--   * (user_id) for "what RFCs am I a collaborator on?" reads.
+
+CREATE TABLE rfc_invitations (
+    id                      INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,
+    rfc_slug                TEXT NOT NULL REFERENCES cached_rfcs(slug) ON DELETE CASCADE,
+    inviter_user_id         INTEGER REFERENCES users(id) ON DELETE SET NULL,
+    invitee_email           TEXT NOT NULL,
+    role_in_rfc             TEXT NOT NULL CHECK (role_in_rfc IN ('contributor', 'discussant')),
+    status                  TEXT NOT NULL DEFAULT 'pending'
+        CHECK (status IN ('pending', 'accepted', 'revoked', 'expired')),
+    token                   TEXT NOT NULL,
+    expires_at              TEXT NOT NULL,
+    created_at              TEXT NOT NULL DEFAULT (datetime('now')),
+    accepted_at             TEXT,
+    accepted_by_user_id     INTEGER REFERENCES users(id) ON DELETE SET NULL
+);
+
+CREATE UNIQUE INDEX idx_rfc_invitations_token ON rfc_invitations (token);
+CREATE INDEX idx_rfc_invitations_rfc_status ON rfc_invitations (rfc_slug, status);
+CREATE INDEX idx_rfc_invitations_email_status ON rfc_invitations (invitee_email, status);
+
+CREATE TABLE rfc_collaborators (
+    id              INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,
+    rfc_slug        TEXT NOT NULL REFERENCES cached_rfcs(slug) ON DELETE CASCADE,
+    user_id         INTEGER NOT NULL REFERENCES users(id) ON DELETE CASCADE,
+    role_in_rfc     TEXT NOT NULL CHECK (role_in_rfc IN ('contributor', 'discussant')),
+    invitation_id   INTEGER REFERENCES rfc_invitations(id) ON DELETE SET NULL,
+    created_at      TEXT NOT NULL DEFAULT (datetime('now'))
+);
+
+CREATE UNIQUE INDEX idx_rfc_collaborators_unique ON rfc_collaborators (rfc_slug, user_id);
+CREATE INDEX idx_rfc_collaborators_user ON rfc_collaborators (user_id);

backend/migrations/019_user_invite_tokens.sql

@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+-- §6.1 / v0.17.0: admin-create user with role + invite email (roadmap item #16).
+--
+-- Distinguishes from the v0.8.0 / v0.9.0 self-serve beta-access shape:
+-- here an *admin* creates a `users` row *before* the invited person has
+-- ever signed in, assigns them a role at creation time, and sends them
+-- an invite email carrying a claim link. The invitee clicks the link,
+-- the claim flow consumes the token (which is itself proof of email
+-- control), the row is marked claimed, and the user is signed in
+-- inheriting the pre-set role.
+--
+-- Migration slot 019 is allocated to this release. Slot 018 is reserved
+-- for the parallel #12 release (per-RFC invitation, owner-only) shipping
+-- in the same wave; the two features live in distinct tables
+-- (`user_invite_tokens` here vs. `rfc_invitations` there) so they
+-- coexist cleanly. Slot 016 was reserved+skipped by Session K during
+-- v0.9.0 integration; slot 017 is the v0.11.0 device-trust table.
+--
+-- Open-question decisions settled in this release (see CHANGELOG):
+--   * No `users` table changes — the brief floated `first_sign_in_at`
+--     / `last_seen_at IS NULL` as the "(pending invite)" discriminator,
+--     but the existing `users.last_seen_at` is NOT NULL with a
+--     `datetime('now')` default (migrations/001) and there is no
+--     `first_sign_in_at` column. Rather than land a schema migration to
+--     introduce one, the discriminator is the existence of an active
+--     (not-claimed, not-expired) row in `user_invite_tokens` joined on
+--     `invited_user_id`. The admin user-listing carries a
+--     `pending_invite` field populated via that join; on claim, the
+--     invite row's `claimed_at` populates and the badge clears.
+--     No new `permission_state` value is introduced either.
+--   * The token is opaque (random URL-safe string, bcrypt-hashed at
+--     rest), not a JWT, so admin revocation by row UPDATE works
+--     without distributing a key-rotation gesture.
+--   * The TTL is a constant (`INVITE_TOKEN_TTL_DAYS = 7` in
+--     `backend/app/invites.py`); env-var configurability is a follow-up.
+--   * Immediate-send (no admin-review-then-send queue) ships in this
+--     release; admin-preview is a future enhancement.
+--   * Bulk-invite (CSV paste) is deferred to a follow-up release;
+--     v0.17.0 is one-at-a-time.
+--
+-- Storage shape:
+--
+--   * `id` — surrogate key. Lets the admin "pending invites" listing
+--     address a row without leaking the token shape.
+--   * `email` — the address the invite was sent to (case-insensitive
+--     match at claim time, persisted verbatim for the audit trail).
+--   * `role` — the role the invitee inherits on first sign-in. Pinned
+--     via CHECK to the same set the §6.1 role flip accepts
+--     (`owner` / `admin` / `contributor`) so a future role-set drift
+--     fails loudly at insert rather than provisioning a ghost role.
+--   * `first_name` / `last_name` — captured at create time so the
+--     invitee skips the v0.8.0 capture-form step on first sign-in.
+--   * `custom_message` — optional free-text from the admin (max 500
+--     chars enforced at the API layer); embedded verbatim in the
+--     email body if present.
+--   * `token_hash` — bcrypt hash of the random opaque token. The
+--     raw token only ever lives in the outbound email link and the
+--     inbound claim body; server-side storage is the hash.
+--   * `expires_at` — `created_at + 7 days` (default at the app layer
+--     via `INVITE_TOKEN_TTL_DAYS`). A row past this stamp is dead;
+--     the claim path refuses with HTTP 410.
+--   * `created_at` — when the admin issued the invite.
+--   * `created_by_admin_id` — FK into users(id) for the admin who
+--     created the invite (no cascade; if the admin's row is deleted
+--     the invite history stays so the audit trail survives).
+--   * `claimed_at` — non-NULL once the invitee successfully claims.
+--     A second claim attempt against an already-claimed row returns
+--     HTTP 410.
+--   * `claimed_by_user_id` — FK into users(id) for the user row
+--     that consumed the token. In the common case this equals the
+--     freshly-provisioned row that was created at invite time; the
+--     FK lets the admin's "claimed" list join through.
+--   * `invited_user_id` — FK into users(id) for the pre-provisioned
+--     row. Created at invite time with `last_seen_at IS NULL` so the
+--     v0.9.0 admin user-management page can render a "(pending
+--     invite)" badge alongside existing users.
+--
+-- Indexing:
+--   * Unique index on `token_hash` documents the no-collision
+--     invariant (256 bits of CSPRNG entropy; collision is
+--     structurally impossible, the unique constraint catches a
+--     bug at insert time).
+--   * Index on `(email, claimed_at)` so the "is this email already
+--     invited?" pre-check the admin endpoint runs is a covering walk.
+--   * Index on `(created_by_admin_id, created_at DESC)` for the
+--     admin's "invites I've sent" listing.
+
+CREATE TABLE user_invite_tokens (
+    id                   INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT,
+    email                TEXT NOT NULL,
+    role                 TEXT NOT NULL CHECK (role IN ('owner', 'admin', 'contributor')),
+    first_name           TEXT NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
+    last_name            TEXT NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
+    custom_message       TEXT NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
+    token_hash           TEXT NOT NULL,
+    expires_at           TEXT NOT NULL,
+    created_at           TEXT NOT NULL DEFAULT (datetime('now')),
+    created_by_admin_id  INTEGER NOT NULL REFERENCES users(id),
+    claimed_at           TEXT,
+    claimed_by_user_id   INTEGER REFERENCES users(id),
+    invited_user_id      INTEGER NOT NULL REFERENCES users(id) ON DELETE CASCADE
+);
+
+CREATE UNIQUE INDEX idx_user_invite_tokens_hash ON user_invite_tokens (token_hash);
+CREATE INDEX idx_user_invite_tokens_email ON user_invite_tokens (email, claimed_at);
+CREATE INDEX idx_user_invite_tokens_admin ON user_invite_tokens (created_by_admin_id, created_at DESC);

backend/tests/test_admin_create_user_invite_vertical.py

@@ -0,0 +1,649 @@
+"""End-to-end integration tests for v0.17.0's admin-create user +
+invite-email + claim-flow vertical (roadmap item #16, §6.1).
+
+The release lands three halves of the same surface:
+
+  * **Admin-create user** at `POST /api/admin/users`. The admin types
+    email, first/last name, role, and an optional custom message. The
+    framework provisions the invitee `users` row (granted, with the
+    chosen role) and writes a `user_invite_tokens` row carrying the
+    bcrypt-hashed opaque token. The "pending invite" discriminator is
+    the active `user_invite_tokens` row joined on `invited_user_id`,
+    not a NULL column on `users` (the existing `last_seen_at` column
+    is NOT NULL). An invite email dispatches via the existing SMTP
+    relay.
+
+  * **Pending-invite admin listing** at `GET /api/admin/users/invites`.
+    Lists active (not claimed, not expired) invites for the admin's
+    "I sent these but they haven't been claimed yet" view.
+
+  * **Claim** at `POST /api/invites/claim`. The invitee POSTs the token
+    they got via email; the framework verifies, marks the row claimed,
+    signs them in (skipping OTC on first sign-in per the roadmap), and
+    returns a `needs_passcode` hint for the frontend to route to the
+    passcode-set screen.
+
+The tests prove:
+
+  * The happy path: admin creates → invite row + email envelope land →
+    invitee claims with the token → session is established.
+  * Non-admin caller is refused 403.
+  * Self-invite is refused 422.
+  * Duplicate email is refused 409.
+  * Owner-grant by non-owner is refused 422.
+  * Malformed role is refused 422 (pydantic regex).
+  * Custom message over 500 chars is refused 422 (pydantic max_length).
+  * Claim with valid token: signs in + marks row claimed.
+  * Claim with expired token: HTTP 410.
+  * Claim with already-claimed token: HTTP 410.
+  * Claim with unknown token: HTTP 400.
+  * The admin-create gesture writes a `permission_events` row with
+    event_kind='user_invited'.
+  * The user listing surfaces the `pending_invite` field for invited-
+    but-not-yet-claimed users, and clears it after claim.
+"""
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import json
+
+from test_propose_vertical import (  # noqa: F401 — fixtures land via import
+    FakeGitea,
+    app_with_fake_gitea,
+    provision_user_row,
+    sign_in_as,
+    tmp_env,
+)
+
+
+def _reset_outbound():
+    from app import email as email_mod
+    email_mod.reset_sent_envelopes()
+
+
+def _outbound_invite_envelopes(to_address: str | None = None) -> list[dict]:
+    """Pull the invite-kind envelopes off the shared notifier buffer.
+
+    Mirrors the OTC code-extraction helper in
+    test_admin_users_vertical.py — invite emails land in the same
+    `_SENT` buffer with `kind='invite'`.
+    """
+    from app import email as email_mod
+    out = []
+    for env in email_mod.sent_envelopes():
+        if env.get("kind") != "invite":
+            continue
+        if to_address is not None and env["to"] != to_address:
+            continue
+        out.append(env)
+    return out
+
+
+def _extract_claim_url(envelope: dict) -> str:
+    """Pull the claim URL out of the invite email body."""
+    for line in envelope["body"].splitlines():
+        line = line.strip()
+        if line.startswith("http") and "/invites/claim" in line:
+            return line
+    raise AssertionError(f"no claim URL in envelope body: {envelope['body']!r}")
+
+
+def _extract_claim_token(envelope: dict) -> str:
+    """Pull the `token` query-string param out of the claim URL."""
+    from urllib.parse import urlparse, parse_qs
+    url = _extract_claim_url(envelope)
+    qs = parse_qs(urlparse(url).query)
+    return qs["token"][0]
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Admin create + invite — happy path
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+def test_admin_create_user_invite_happy_path(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    """Admin creates → user row + invite-token row + email envelope all
+    land; the response carries the created ids and the inviter is the
+    admin who issued the gesture."""
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+    from app import db
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        provision_user_row(user_id=100, login="adminzero", role="admin")
+        sign_in_as(
+            client, user_id=100, gitea_login="adminzero",
+            display_name="Admin Zero", role="admin",
+            email="adminzero@test",
+        )
+        _reset_outbound()
+
+        r = client.post(
+            "/api/admin/users",
+            json={
+                "email": "invitee@example.com",
+                "first_name": "Inv",
+                "last_name": "Tee",
+                "role": "contributor",
+                "custom_message": "We chatted at the conference — welcome!",
+            },
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
+        body = r.json()
+        assert body["ok"] is True
+        assert body["email"] == "invitee@example.com"
+        assert body["role"] == "contributor"
+        assert body["invite_id"] > 0
+        assert body["invited_user_id"] > 0
+
+        # User row exists with the chosen role + granted. The "pending
+        # invite" discriminator is the active `user_invite_tokens` row,
+        # not a NULL column on `users` — see the invites.create_invite
+        # docstring for the reasoning.
+        row = db.conn().execute(
+            "SELECT role, permission_state, first_name, last_name "
+            "FROM users WHERE email = ? COLLATE NOCASE",
+            ("invitee@example.com",),
+        ).fetchone()
+        assert row is not None
+        assert row["role"] == "contributor"
+        assert row["permission_state"] == "granted"
+        assert row["first_name"] == "Inv"
+        assert row["last_name"] == "Tee"
+
+        # Invite-token row exists with the matching ids and the custom
+        # message persisted verbatim.
+        invite = db.conn().execute(
+            "SELECT email, role, custom_message, created_by_admin_id, "
+            "invited_user_id, claimed_at FROM user_invite_tokens WHERE id = ?",
+            (body["invite_id"],),
+        ).fetchone()
+        assert invite is not None
+        assert invite["email"] == "invitee@example.com"
+        assert invite["role"] == "contributor"
+        assert invite["custom_message"] == "We chatted at the conference — welcome!"
+        assert invite["created_by_admin_id"] == 100
+        assert invite["invited_user_id"] == body["invited_user_id"]
+        assert invite["claimed_at"] is None
+
+        # Email envelope landed with the invite kind and embeds the
+        # custom message + claim URL. The inviter display name comes
+        # off the DB row (which provision_user_row sets to
+        # login.capitalize()), not the sign_in_as cookie payload.
+        envelopes = _outbound_invite_envelopes(to_address="invitee@example.com")
+        assert len(envelopes) == 1
+        env = envelopes[0]
+        assert "Adminzero" in env["subject"] or "Adminzero" in env["body"]
+        assert "We chatted at the conference — welcome!" in env["body"]
+        # Claim URL is well-formed.
+        url = _extract_claim_url(env)
+        assert "/invites/claim?token=" in url
+
+        # `permission_events` row landed with event_kind='user_invited'.
+        ev = db.conn().execute(
+            "SELECT actor_user_id, subject_user_id, event_kind, details "
+            "FROM permission_events WHERE event_kind = 'user_invited'"
+        ).fetchall()
+        assert len(ev) == 1
+        assert ev[0]["actor_user_id"] == 100
+        assert ev[0]["subject_user_id"] == body["invited_user_id"]
+        details = json.loads(ev[0]["details"])
+        assert details["email"] == "invitee@example.com"
+        assert details["role"] == "contributor"
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Refusals on the admin-create endpoint
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+def test_admin_create_user_invite_refuses_non_admin(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    """A contributor caller is refused 403; an anonymous caller 401."""
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        provision_user_row(user_id=110, login="contrib", role="contributor")
+        sign_in_as(
+            client, user_id=110, gitea_login="contrib",
+            display_name="Contrib", role="contributor",
+        )
+        r = client.post(
+            "/api/admin/users",
+            json={"email": "x@y.com", "role": "contributor"},
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 403, r.text
+
+        client.cookies.clear()
+        r = client.post(
+            "/api/admin/users",
+            json={"email": "x@y.com", "role": "contributor"},
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 401
+
+
+def test_admin_create_user_invite_refuses_self_email(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    """An admin trying to invite their own email is refused 422 —
+    self-invite is the wrong channel; the role-change endpoint exists
+    for self-edits."""
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        provision_user_row(user_id=120, login="adm", role="admin")
+        # Manually set the admin's email since provision_user_row's
+        # fixture uses login@test; this is what we'll try to self-invite.
+        from app import db
+        db.conn().execute(
+            "UPDATE users SET email = ? WHERE id = ?",
+            ("selfinviter@example.com", 120),
+        )
+        sign_in_as(
+            client, user_id=120, gitea_login="adm",
+            display_name="Adm", role="admin",
+            email="selfinviter@example.com",
+        )
+        r = client.post(
+            "/api/admin/users",
+            json={
+                "email": "selfinviter@example.com",
+                "role": "contributor",
+            },
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 422, r.text
+        assert "yourself" in r.json()["detail"].lower()
+
+
+def test_admin_create_user_invite_refuses_duplicate_email(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    """An admin trying to invite an email that already maps to a users
+    row is refused 409 — the existing role / grant gestures are the
+    right surface for an existing user."""
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        provision_user_row(user_id=130, login="adminD", role="admin")
+        provision_user_row(user_id=131, login="existingone", role="contributor")
+        sign_in_as(
+            client, user_id=130, gitea_login="adminD",
+            display_name="Admin D", role="admin",
+        )
+        # provision_user_row sets email to <login>@test, so:
+        r = client.post(
+            "/api/admin/users",
+            json={
+                "email": "existingone@test",
+                "role": "contributor",
+            },
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 409, r.text
+
+
+def test_admin_create_user_invite_owner_grant_refused_for_non_owner(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    """An admin (not owner) trying to invite a fresh user as `owner` is
+    refused 422 — §6.1's owner-zero is the only bootstrap path."""
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        provision_user_row(user_id=140, login="adminNoOwner", role="admin")
+        sign_in_as(
+            client, user_id=140, gitea_login="adminNoOwner",
+            display_name="Admin", role="admin",
+        )
+        r = client.post(
+            "/api/admin/users",
+            json={
+                "email": "wouldbeowner@example.com",
+                "role": "owner",
+            },
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 422, r.text
+
+
+def test_admin_create_user_invite_owner_can_invite_as_owner(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    """A sitting owner can invite a fresh user as `owner` — the §6.1
+    role-grant channel. Sanity check that the owner-grant path itself
+    works, paired with the refusal above."""
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+    from app import db
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        provision_user_row(user_id=150, login="ownerzero", role="owner")
+        sign_in_as(
+            client, user_id=150, gitea_login="ownerzero",
+            display_name="Owner Zero", role="owner",
+        )
+        r = client.post(
+            "/api/admin/users",
+            json={
+                "email": "newowner@example.com",
+                "role": "owner",
+            },
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
+        row = db.conn().execute(
+            "SELECT role FROM users WHERE email = ? COLLATE NOCASE",
+            ("newowner@example.com",),
+        ).fetchone()
+        assert row["role"] == "owner"
+
+
+def test_admin_create_user_invite_refuses_malformed_role(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    """The pydantic regex refuses any role outside the §6.1 set."""
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        provision_user_row(user_id=160, login="adminR", role="admin")
+        sign_in_as(
+            client, user_id=160, gitea_login="adminR",
+            display_name="Admin R", role="admin",
+        )
+        r = client.post(
+            "/api/admin/users",
+            json={
+                "email": "ok@example.com",
+                "role": "superuser",
+            },
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 422
+
+
+def test_admin_create_user_invite_refuses_long_custom_message(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    """Custom message over the 500-char ceiling is refused 422."""
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        provision_user_row(user_id=170, login="adminM", role="admin")
+        sign_in_as(
+            client, user_id=170, gitea_login="adminM",
+            display_name="Admin M", role="admin",
+        )
+        r = client.post(
+            "/api/admin/users",
+            json={
+                "email": "ok@example.com",
+                "role": "contributor",
+                "custom_message": "x" * 501,
+            },
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 422
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Claim flow
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+def test_claim_with_valid_token_signs_in_and_marks_claimed(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    """End-to-end: admin creates → invitee posts the token to
+    /api/invites/claim → session lands + row marked claimed +
+    last_seen_at stamps on the user row (the pending-invite
+    discriminator clears)."""
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+    from app import db
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        provision_user_row(user_id=200, login="adminC", role="admin")
+        sign_in_as(
+            client, user_id=200, gitea_login="adminC",
+            display_name="Admin C", role="admin",
+        )
+        _reset_outbound()
+
+        r = client.post(
+            "/api/admin/users",
+            json={
+                "email": "claimant@example.com",
+                "first_name": "Clai",
+                "last_name": "Mant",
+                "role": "contributor",
+            },
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 200
+        invite_id = r.json()["invite_id"]
+        invited_user_id = r.json()["invited_user_id"]
+
+        env = _outbound_invite_envelopes("claimant@example.com")[0]
+        token = _extract_claim_token(env)
+
+        # The invitee's request is anonymous (they have no session
+        # yet). We clear the admin's session cookie to simulate this.
+        client.cookies.clear()
+
+        r = client.post(
+            "/api/invites/claim",
+            json={"token": token},
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
+        body = r.json()
+        assert body["ok"] is True
+        assert body["user"]["id"] == invited_user_id
+        assert body["user"]["role"] == "contributor"
+        assert body["user"]["permission_state"] == "granted"
+        # The user has no passcode set yet → frontend should route to
+        # passcode-set per the roadmap.
+        assert body["needs_passcode"] is True
+
+        # Row marked claimed; last_seen_at populated.
+        invite = db.conn().execute(
+            "SELECT claimed_at, claimed_by_user_id FROM user_invite_tokens "
+            "WHERE id = ?",
+            (invite_id,),
+        ).fetchone()
+        assert invite["claimed_at"] is not None
+        assert invite["claimed_by_user_id"] == invited_user_id
+
+        user_row = db.conn().execute(
+            "SELECT last_seen_at FROM users WHERE id = ?",
+            (invited_user_id,),
+        ).fetchone()
+        assert user_row["last_seen_at"] is not None
+
+
+def test_claim_with_expired_token_returns_410(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    """A token whose `expires_at` has passed surfaces as HTTP 410."""
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+    from app import db, invites
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        provision_user_row(user_id=210, login="adminE", role="admin")
+        sign_in_as(
+            client, user_id=210, gitea_login="adminE",
+            display_name="Admin E", role="admin",
+        )
+        _reset_outbound()
+
+        # Create the invite, then back-date the expires_at to the past.
+        r = client.post(
+            "/api/admin/users",
+            json={
+                "email": "expired@example.com",
+                "role": "contributor",
+            },
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 200
+        invite_id = r.json()["invite_id"]
+        db.conn().execute(
+            "UPDATE user_invite_tokens SET expires_at = datetime('now', '-1 day') "
+            "WHERE id = ?",
+            (invite_id,),
+        )
+        env = _outbound_invite_envelopes("expired@example.com")[0]
+        token = _extract_claim_token(env)
+
+        client.cookies.clear()
+        r = client.post("/api/invites/claim", json={"token": token})
+        assert r.status_code == 410, r.text
+        assert "expired" in r.json()["detail"].lower()
+
+
+def test_claim_with_already_claimed_token_returns_410(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    """Re-claiming an already-consumed token surfaces as HTTP 410."""
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        provision_user_row(user_id=220, login="adminA", role="admin")
+        sign_in_as(
+            client, user_id=220, gitea_login="adminA",
+            display_name="Admin A", role="admin",
+        )
+        _reset_outbound()
+
+        r = client.post(
+            "/api/admin/users",
+            json={
+                "email": "twice@example.com",
+                "role": "contributor",
+            },
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 200
+        env = _outbound_invite_envelopes("twice@example.com")[0]
+        token = _extract_claim_token(env)
+
+        client.cookies.clear()
+        # First claim succeeds.
+        r = client.post("/api/invites/claim", json={"token": token})
+        assert r.status_code == 200
+        # Second claim, with the same token, refuses with 410.
+        client.cookies.clear()
+        r = client.post("/api/invites/claim", json={"token": token})
+        assert r.status_code == 410, r.text
+        assert "already" in r.json()["detail"].lower()
+
+
+def test_claim_with_unknown_token_returns_400(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    """A token that doesn't match any active invite is HTTP 400."""
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        # No invite ever created; the token is whatever the attacker
+        # types in. The endpoint should refuse without disclosing
+        # whether the token "looked" right.
+        r = client.post(
+            "/api/invites/claim",
+            json={"token": "totally-made-up-token-string-that-is-not-real"},
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 400, r.text
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Pending-invite admin listing
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+def test_pending_invites_listing_shows_active_invites_only(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    """The `GET /api/admin/users/invites` listing filters to active
+    invites — claimed and expired rows do not surface here (the admin
+    user-listing carries the per-row pending-invite badge for the
+    living rows; once claimed, the badge clears)."""
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        provision_user_row(user_id=300, login="adminL", role="admin")
+        sign_in_as(
+            client, user_id=300, gitea_login="adminL",
+            display_name="Admin L", role="admin",
+        )
+        _reset_outbound()
+
+        # Create three invites: one stays pending, one we'll claim, one
+        # we'll back-date to expired.
+        for email in ("alive@ex.co", "claimed@ex.co", "expired@ex.co"):
+            r = client.post(
+                "/api/admin/users",
+                json={"email": email, "role": "contributor"},
+            )
+            assert r.status_code == 200
+
+        # Claim the middle one.
+        env = _outbound_invite_envelopes("claimed@ex.co")[0]
+        token_claim = _extract_claim_token(env)
+
+        # Expire the third one.
+        from app import db
+        db.conn().execute(
+            "UPDATE user_invite_tokens SET expires_at = datetime('now', '-1 day') "
+            "WHERE email = 'expired@ex.co'"
+        )
+
+        # The admin's session is still on the cookie. Claim works
+        # anonymously; we clear and restore.
+        admin_cookie = client.cookies.get("rfc_session")
+        client.cookies.clear()
+        r = client.post("/api/invites/claim", json={"token": token_claim})
+        assert r.status_code == 200
+        client.cookies.set("rfc_session", admin_cookie)
+
+        r = client.get("/api/admin/users/invites")
+        assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
+        items = r.json()["items"]
+        emails = sorted(i["email"] for i in items)
+        assert emails == ["alive@ex.co"]
+
+
+def test_pending_invite_badge_clears_after_claim(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    """The `/api/admin/users` listing surfaces `pending_invite` while
+    the invite is unclaimed; after the invitee claims, the row's
+    pending_invite is null."""
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        provision_user_row(user_id=310, login="adminB", role="admin")
+        sign_in_as(
+            client, user_id=310, gitea_login="adminB",
+            display_name="Admin B", role="admin",
+        )
+        _reset_outbound()
+
+        r = client.post(
+            "/api/admin/users",
+            json={"email": "badgey@ex.co", "role": "contributor"},
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 200
+        invited_id = r.json()["invited_user_id"]
+
+        # Before claim — pending_invite is populated.
+        r = client.get("/api/admin/users")
+        assert r.status_code == 200
+        row = next(u for u in r.json()["items"] if u["id"] == invited_id)
+        assert row["pending_invite"] is not None
+        assert row["pending_invite"]["invite_id"] > 0
+
+        # Claim.
+        env = _outbound_invite_envelopes("badgey@ex.co")[0]
+        token = _extract_claim_token(env)
+        admin_cookie = client.cookies.get("rfc_session")
+        client.cookies.clear()
+        r = client.post("/api/invites/claim", json={"token": token})
+        assert r.status_code == 200
+        client.cookies.set("rfc_session", admin_cookie)
+
+        # After claim — pending_invite is null.
+        r = client.get("/api/admin/users")
+        assert r.status_code == 200
+        row = next(u for u in r.json()["items"] if u["id"] == invited_id)
+        assert row["pending_invite"] is None
+
+
+def test_pending_invites_listing_admin_only(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    """The listing requires admin/owner; contributor gets 403."""
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        provision_user_row(user_id=320, login="contribL", role="contributor")
+        sign_in_as(
+            client, user_id=320, gitea_login="contribL",
+            display_name="Contrib L", role="contributor",
+        )
+        r = client.get("/api/admin/users/invites")
+        assert r.status_code == 403

backend/tests/test_admin_users_vertical.py

@@ -0,0 +1,425 @@
+"""End-to-end integration tests for v0.9.0's admin user-management page
+and new-beta-request notifications (roadmap item #7, §6.1 / §15).
+
+The release lands two halves of the same surface:
+
+  * **Admin notification on new beta request.** When a pending user
+    submits `POST /api/auth/me/beta-request`, every owner/admin
+    receives a `new_beta_request` notification (the §15 substrate
+    insert lands the row; the §15.4 email path dispatches subject to
+    the recipient's `email_admin_actionable` toggle).
+
+  * **Admin user-management surface** at `/admin/users`. The
+    `GET /api/admin/users` listing carries every user with their
+    permission_state, profile fields, sign-up reason, and decision
+    audit. The new `POST /api/admin/users/<id>/permission` endpoint
+    flips the column and writes a `permission_events` row.
+
+The tests prove:
+
+  * The first beta-request submission fans a `new_beta_request`
+    row out to every admin/owner (and not to the requester
+    themselves). The row carries the captured profile in
+    `payload.extras`.
+  * Re-submitting the form from the same pending user doesn't
+    re-fan (we only notify on the row's first complete state).
+  * `GET /api/admin/users` carries the v0.9.0 columns
+    (permission_state, first/last/reason, decided_by).
+  * `POST /api/admin/users/<id>/permission` flips the state,
+    stamps decided_by/at, and writes a `permission_events` row.
+  * The endpoint refuses self-flip (422) and refuses non-admin
+    callers (403).
+  * The endpoint accepts only the three valid states (422 on
+    anything else).
+"""
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+from test_propose_vertical import (  # noqa: F401 — fixtures land via import
+    FakeGitea,
+    app_with_fake_gitea,
+    provision_user_row,
+    sign_in_as,
+    tmp_env,
+)
+
+
+def _reset_outbound():
+    from app import email as email_mod
+    email_mod.reset_sent_envelopes()
+
+
+def _outbound_otc_codes(to_address: str | None = None) -> list[str]:
+    from app import email as email_mod
+    out = []
+    for env in email_mod.sent_envelopes():
+        if env.get("kind") != "otc":
+            continue
+        if to_address is not None and env["to"] != to_address:
+            continue
+        for line in env["body"].splitlines():
+            tok = line.strip()
+            if tok.isdigit() and len(tok) == 6:
+                out.append(tok)
+                break
+    return out
+
+
+def _provision_pending_user(client, email: str) -> int:
+    """Sign in a fresh OTC user (lands `pending`) and return their user_id."""
+    from app import db
+    _reset_outbound()
+    client.post("/auth/otc/request", json={"email": email})
+    code = _outbound_otc_codes(email)[-1]
+    client.post("/auth/otc/verify", json={"email": email, "code": code})
+    row = db.conn().execute(
+        "SELECT id FROM users WHERE email = ? COLLATE NOCASE", (email,)
+    ).fetchone()
+    return row["id"]
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Admin notification on beta-request submission
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+def test_beta_request_submission_notifies_every_admin(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    """First-time submission of a beta-request fans a notification out
+    to every owner and admin. The requester themselves never receives
+    a row (filtered out by user_id even if they happened to be in the
+    admin set, which they aren't in practice — fresh OTC users are
+    `contributor`+`pending`)."""
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+    from app import db
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        # Provision two admins and one owner so the fan-out has multiple
+        # targets. The OWNER_GITEA_LOGIN-derived ownership doesn't fire
+        # here (no OAuth round-trip in this path); we seed the role
+        # directly.
+        provision_user_row(user_id=10, login="ownerzero", role="owner")
+        provision_user_row(user_id=11, login="admin_one", role="admin")
+        provision_user_row(user_id=12, login="admin_two", role="admin")
+        provision_user_row(user_id=13, login="contrib_one", role="contributor")
+
+        # Sign in a fresh OTC user → permission_state='pending'.
+        requester_id = _provision_pending_user(client, "newbie@example.com")
+
+        # Capture-form submit.
+        r = client.post(
+            "/api/auth/me/beta-request",
+            json={
+                "first_name": "Newt",
+                "last_name": "Newcomer",
+                "beta_request_reason": "I want to write the Human RFC.",
+            },
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
+
+        # Every owner + admin gets a `new_beta_request` notification.
+        # The contributor (id=13) does not. The requester (whoever id
+        # they got) does not.
+        rows = db.conn().execute(
+            """
+            SELECT recipient_user_id, event_kind, actor_user_id, payload
+              FROM notifications
+             WHERE event_kind = 'new_beta_request'
+            """
+        ).fetchall()
+        recipients = sorted(r["recipient_user_id"] for r in rows)
+        assert recipients == [10, 11, 12], f"unexpected recipients: {recipients}"
+        # Actor is the requester (§15.9: never the bot).
+        for r in rows:
+            assert r["actor_user_id"] == requester_id
+            import json as _json
+            extras = _json.loads(r["payload"])
+            assert extras["requester_first_name"] == "Newt"
+            assert extras["requester_last_name"] == "Newcomer"
+            assert extras["requester_email"] == "newbie@example.com"
+
+
+def test_beta_request_resubmit_does_not_re_notify(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    """Once a user has completed the capture form, re-submitting it
+    (the endpoint is idempotent for pending users) must not re-fan a
+    fresh notification to every admin — that would carpet-bomb the
+    inbox on every typo correction."""
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+    from app import db
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        provision_user_row(user_id=20, login="adminzero", role="admin")
+        _provision_pending_user(client, "carpet@example.com")
+
+        body = {
+            "first_name": "Carpet",
+            "last_name": "Bomb",
+            "beta_request_reason": "first draft",
+        }
+        r1 = client.post("/api/auth/me/beta-request", json=body)
+        assert r1.status_code == 200
+
+        # Re-submit with edited reason — endpoint accepts (idempotent
+        # update), but the admin inbox stays at one row.
+        body2 = dict(body, beta_request_reason="cleaner final draft")
+        r2 = client.post("/api/auth/me/beta-request", json=body2)
+        assert r2.status_code == 200
+
+        rows = db.conn().execute(
+            "SELECT COUNT(*) AS n FROM notifications WHERE event_kind = 'new_beta_request'"
+        ).fetchone()
+        assert rows["n"] == 1
+
+
+def test_beta_request_notification_is_admin_actionable_category(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    """The §15.4 category mapping must route `new_beta_request` to the
+    admin-actionable bucket so the email gate consults
+    `email_admin_actionable` (and skips for non-admin recipients).
+    """
+    from app import email as email_mod
+
+    assert email_mod.category_for("new_beta_request", "structural") == "admin-actionable"
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# /api/admin/users — listing carries the v0.9.0 columns
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+def test_admin_users_listing_carries_permission_columns(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    """The Users tab consumes this shape — confirm every required
+    column is on the response."""
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+    from app import db
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        # Seed an admin and a pending user with all the v0.8.0 columns
+        # populated. Direct-DB insert avoids the OTC dance (which would
+        # overwrite the cookie); the test above proves the capture
+        # pathway end-to-end and this one just exercises the listing
+        # surface's shape.
+        provision_user_row(user_id=30, login="ben", role="owner")
+        db.conn().execute(
+            """
+            INSERT INTO users (id, gitea_id, gitea_login, email,
+                               display_name, avatar_url, role,
+                               permission_state, first_name, last_name,
+                               beta_request_reason)
+            VALUES (31, NULL, NULL, 'pendinguser@example.com',
+                    'pendinguser', '', 'contributor',
+                    'pending', 'Penn', 'Ding', 'I want in.')
+            """
+        )
+
+        sign_in_as(
+            client, user_id=30, gitea_login="ben",
+            display_name="Ben", role="owner",
+        )
+
+        r = client.get("/api/admin/users")
+        assert r.status_code == 200
+        items = r.json()["items"]
+        assert isinstance(items, list)
+        pending = next(
+            (i for i in items if i["email"] == "pendinguser@example.com"), None,
+        )
+        assert pending is not None
+        assert pending["permission_state"] == "pending"
+        assert pending["first_name"] == "Penn"
+        assert pending["last_name"] == "Ding"
+        assert pending["beta_request_reason"] == "I want in."
+        assert pending["permission_decided_at"] is None
+        assert pending["permission_decided_by_login"] is None
+        # Pending bucket is listed first (sort order).
+        assert items[0]["permission_state"] == "pending"
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# /api/admin/users/<id>/permission — the flip endpoint
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+def test_permission_flip_grant_promotes_pending_to_granted(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    """The end-to-end gesture: a fresh OTC user lands pending, an admin
+    flips them to granted via the endpoint, the row reflects the new
+    state + decided_by/at, and a `permission_events` audit row lands."""
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+    from app import db
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        # Pending user.
+        pending_id = _provision_pending_user(client, "flip@example.com")
+
+        # Admin acting on them.
+        provision_user_row(user_id=40, login="adminflipper", role="admin")
+        sign_in_as(
+            client, user_id=40, gitea_login="adminflipper",
+            display_name="Admin Flipper", role="admin",
+        )
+
+        r = client.post(
+            f"/api/admin/users/{pending_id}/permission",
+            json={"state": "granted"},
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
+        body = r.json()
+        assert body["permission_state"] == "granted"
+        assert body["changed"] is True
+
+        # Row reflects the new state + decision stamp.
+        row = db.conn().execute(
+            "SELECT permission_state, permission_decided_by, permission_decided_at "
+            "FROM users WHERE id = ?",
+            (pending_id,),
+        ).fetchone()
+        assert row["permission_state"] == "granted"
+        assert row["permission_decided_by"] == 40
+        assert row["permission_decided_at"] is not None
+
+        # Audit row landed in permission_events.
+        events = db.conn().execute(
+            """
+            SELECT actor_user_id, subject_user_id, event_kind
+              FROM permission_events
+             WHERE event_kind = 'permission_granted'
+            """
+        ).fetchall()
+        assert len(events) == 1
+        assert events[0]["actor_user_id"] == 40
+        assert events[0]["subject_user_id"] == pending_id
+
+
+def test_permission_flip_revoke_promotes_granted_to_revoked(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    """Revoke is the symmetric gesture. Used when an account earned a
+    grant then later lost it (§6.1 / `revoked` state)."""
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+    from app import db
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        provision_user_row(user_id=50, login="goner", role="contributor")
+        # Default permission_state is 'granted' via the column default.
+        provision_user_row(user_id=51, login="adminrevoker", role="admin")
+        sign_in_as(
+            client, user_id=51, gitea_login="adminrevoker",
+            display_name="Admin Revoker", role="admin",
+        )
+
+        r = client.post(
+            "/api/admin/users/50/permission",
+            json={"state": "revoked"},
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
+
+        row = db.conn().execute(
+            "SELECT permission_state FROM users WHERE id = 50"
+        ).fetchone()
+        assert row["permission_state"] == "revoked"
+
+        events = db.conn().execute(
+            "SELECT event_kind FROM permission_events "
+            "WHERE event_kind = 'permission_revoked' AND subject_user_id = 50"
+        ).fetchall()
+        assert len(events) == 1
+
+
+def test_permission_flip_refuses_self(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    """Symmetric to set_mute / set_role: an admin can't self-flip.
+    The state-change channel for one's own grant is somebody else's
+    hand."""
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        provision_user_row(user_id=60, login="selfflipper", role="admin")
+        sign_in_as(
+            client, user_id=60, gitea_login="selfflipper",
+            display_name="Self Flipper", role="admin",
+        )
+        r = client.post(
+            "/api/admin/users/60/permission",
+            json={"state": "revoked"},
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 422
+
+
+def test_permission_flip_refuses_non_admin(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    """The endpoint is admin-only (§17 admin/* requires require_admin).
+    A contributor caller is refused 403; an anonymous caller 401."""
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        provision_user_row(user_id=70, login="target", role="contributor")
+        provision_user_row(user_id=71, login="contrib", role="contributor")
+        sign_in_as(
+            client, user_id=71, gitea_login="contrib",
+            display_name="Contrib", role="contributor",
+        )
+        r = client.post(
+            "/api/admin/users/70/permission",
+            json={"state": "granted"},
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 403
+
+        client.cookies.clear()
+        r = client.post(
+            "/api/admin/users/70/permission",
+            json={"state": "granted"},
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 401
+
+
+def test_permission_flip_refuses_invalid_state(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    """Pydantic regex pattern refuses anything outside the three
+    canonical states with 422."""
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        provision_user_row(user_id=80, login="targetx", role="contributor")
+        provision_user_row(user_id=81, login="adminx", role="admin")
+        sign_in_as(
+            client, user_id=81, gitea_login="adminx",
+            display_name="Admin X", role="admin",
+        )
+        r = client.post(
+            "/api/admin/users/80/permission",
+            json={"state": "banished"},
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 422
+
+
+def test_permission_flip_no_op_when_state_already_matches(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    """An admin flipping a granted user to granted gets 200 with
+    `changed: false` — no audit row, no decided_at update."""
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+    from app import db
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        provision_user_row(user_id=90, login="alreadygranted", role="contributor")
+        provision_user_row(user_id=91, login="adminN", role="admin")
+        sign_in_as(
+            client, user_id=91, gitea_login="adminN",
+            display_name="Admin N", role="admin",
+        )
+
+        before_events = db.conn().execute(
+            "SELECT COUNT(*) AS n FROM permission_events"
+        ).fetchone()["n"]
+
+        r = client.post(
+            "/api/admin/users/90/permission",
+            json={"state": "granted"},
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 200
+        body = r.json()
+        assert body["changed"] is False
+
+        after_events = db.conn().execute(
+            "SELECT COUNT(*) AS n FROM permission_events"
+        ).fetchone()["n"]
+        assert after_events == before_events

backend/tests/test_beta_access_vertical.py

@@ -0,0 +1,390 @@
+"""End-to-end integration tests for v0.8.0's open beta-access request
+flow (§6.1 / §14.1, roadmap item #6).
+
+The release replaces v0.3.0's `allowed_emails` allowlist as the
+admission gate. Any valid email can sign in via the v0.7.0 OTC flow;
+a fresh user lands in `permission_state='pending'` until an admin
+grants access. The first-OTC flow captures first name, last name,
+and a free-text "why I should be included in the beta" via a new
+`POST /api/auth/me/beta-request` endpoint.
+
+The tests prove:
+
+  * A fresh OTC user lands `permission_state='pending'` with empty
+    profile fields, and the verify-response carries `needs_profile=true`.
+  * `POST /api/auth/me/beta-request` populates the three fields and
+    leaves the row in `pending`.
+  * A pending user is refused write endpoints (representative
+    samples: propose RFC, post discussion thread). The refusal is
+    403 (not 401 — they're authenticated, just not granted).
+  * An admin-grant flow promotes pending → granted. v0.8.0 doesn't
+    ship an admin UI for this (deferred to item #7 / v0.9.0), so
+    the test flips the column directly via DB and asserts that
+    `require_contributor` now admits the user.
+  * A grandfathered user (existing row pre-migration, default
+    `permission_state='granted'`) is unaffected — write endpoints
+    accept them.
+  * The `/auth/otc/request` endpoint accepts any email — the
+    v0.7.0 allowlist gate is gone from this path. The `allowed_emails`
+    table stays in the schema; the admin UI from v0.3.0 continues to
+    manage it for the fast-path bypass deployments may use.
+"""
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import pytest
+
+from test_propose_vertical import (  # noqa: F401 — fixtures land via import
+    FakeGitea,
+    app_with_fake_gitea,
+    provision_user_row,
+    sign_in_as,
+    tmp_env,
+)
+
+
+def _reset_outbound():
+    from app import email as email_mod
+    email_mod.reset_sent_envelopes()
+
+
+def _outbound_otc_codes(to_address: str | None = None) -> list[str]:
+    """Pluck the code line from every OTC envelope in the test buffer."""
+    from app import email as email_mod
+    out = []
+    for env in email_mod.sent_envelopes():
+        if env.get("kind") != "otc":
+            continue
+        if to_address is not None and env["to"] != to_address:
+            continue
+        for line in env["body"].splitlines():
+            tok = line.strip()
+            if tok.isdigit() and len(tok) == 6:
+                out.append(tok)
+                break
+    return out
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Fresh OTC sign-in lands pending with empty fields
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+def test_fresh_otc_user_lands_pending_with_empty_profile(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+    from app import db
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        _reset_outbound()
+
+        # Request + verify the OTC.
+        r = client.post("/auth/otc/request", json={"email": "newcomer@example.com"})
+        assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
+        code = _outbound_otc_codes("newcomer@example.com")[-1]
+
+        r = client.post("/auth/otc/verify", json={"email": "newcomer@example.com", "code": code})
+        assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
+        body = r.json()
+        # The verify response carries the new fields v0.8.0 added.
+        assert body["needs_profile"] is True
+        assert body["user"]["permission_state"] == "pending"
+
+        # The row reflects the same: pending state, no profile yet.
+        row = db.conn().execute(
+            "SELECT permission_state, first_name, last_name, beta_request_reason FROM users WHERE email = ? COLLATE NOCASE",
+            ("newcomer@example.com",),
+        ).fetchone()
+        assert row is not None
+        assert row["permission_state"] == "pending"
+        assert row["first_name"] is None
+        assert row["last_name"] is None
+        assert row["beta_request_reason"] is None
+
+        # /api/auth/me surfaces the same shape.
+        me = client.get("/api/auth/me").json()
+        assert me["authenticated"] is True
+        assert me["user"]["permission_state"] == "pending"
+        assert me["user"]["needs_profile"] is True
+        assert me["user"]["first_name"] == ""
+        assert me["user"]["last_name"] == ""
+        assert me["user"]["beta_request_reason"] == ""
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# beta-request endpoint captures the fields and leaves state pending
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+def test_beta_request_populates_fields_keeps_state_pending(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+    from app import db
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        _reset_outbound()
+        # Sign in the fresh user via the full OTC flow.
+        client.post("/auth/otc/request", json={"email": "alice@example.com"})
+        code = _outbound_otc_codes("alice@example.com")[-1]
+        client.post("/auth/otc/verify", json={"email": "alice@example.com", "code": code})
+
+        # Submit the capture form.
+        r = client.post(
+            "/api/auth/me/beta-request",
+            json={
+                "first_name": "Alice",
+                "last_name": "Liddell",
+                "beta_request_reason": "I want to help write the RFCs.",
+            },
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
+
+        # The row reflects the captured fields; state stays pending.
+        row = db.conn().execute(
+            "SELECT permission_state, first_name, last_name, beta_request_reason FROM users WHERE email = ? COLLATE NOCASE",
+            ("alice@example.com",),
+        ).fetchone()
+        assert row["permission_state"] == "pending"
+        assert row["first_name"] == "Alice"
+        assert row["last_name"] == "Liddell"
+        assert row["beta_request_reason"] == "I want to help write the RFCs."
+
+        # /api/auth/me now reports needs_profile=false (fields are set).
+        me = client.get("/api/auth/me").json()
+        assert me["user"]["permission_state"] == "pending"
+        assert me["user"]["needs_profile"] is False
+        assert me["user"]["first_name"] == "Alice"
+
+
+def test_beta_request_refuses_anonymous(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    """The endpoint requires authentication — an anonymous caller can't
+    file a request without first signing in via OTC."""
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        client.cookies.clear()
+        r = client.post(
+            "/api/auth/me/beta-request",
+            json={"first_name": "A", "last_name": "B", "beta_request_reason": "Hi"},
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 401
+
+
+def test_beta_request_refuses_granted_user(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    """A grandfathered (already granted) user has no business filing a
+    beta request. The endpoint refuses with 409 so the client can
+    distinguish the failure from "we don't know you" (401)."""
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        provision_user_row(user_id=1, login="grandfathered", role="contributor")
+        sign_in_as(
+            client,
+            user_id=1,
+            gitea_login="grandfathered",
+            display_name="Grandfathered",
+            role="contributor",
+        )
+        r = client.post(
+            "/api/auth/me/beta-request",
+            json={"first_name": "G", "last_name": "F", "beta_request_reason": "x"},
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 409
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Pending user is refused write endpoints; admin grant promotes them
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+def test_pending_user_is_refused_write_endpoints(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    """A pending user can read everything anonymous can read, but every
+    write-shaped endpoint refuses with 403. The refusal shape mirrors
+    the v0.6.0 / item #4 audit's anon-401 — both are "no contributor
+    capability"; pending is the authenticated-but-ungranted variant.
+
+    Representative samples: propose RFC, post discussion thread.
+    """
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        _reset_outbound()
+        # Sign in via fresh OTC — lands pending.
+        client.post("/auth/otc/request", json={"email": "pending@example.com"})
+        code = _outbound_otc_codes("pending@example.com")[-1]
+        client.post("/auth/otc/verify", json={"email": "pending@example.com", "code": code})
+
+        # Reads work — every anonymous surface stays reachable.
+        assert client.get("/api/health").status_code == 200
+        assert client.get("/api/rfcs").status_code == 200
+        assert client.get("/api/philosophy").status_code == 200
+
+        # Propose — write-shaped, refused with 403.
+        r = client.post(
+            "/api/rfcs/propose",
+            json={"title": "T", "slug": "t", "pitch": "p", "tags": []},
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 403
+        # The error body mentions the review state so a UI surface can
+        # render the right message — but the test asserts only on the
+        # status code (the body shape is the FastAPI default detail).
+
+
+def test_admin_grant_promotes_pending_to_granted(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    """v0.8.0 doesn't ship an admin UI for this — it's deferred to
+    item #7 / v0.9.0. For this release, an admin gesture is an
+    `UPDATE users SET permission_state='granted' WHERE email=?`. The
+    test flips the column directly via DB and asserts the
+    `require_contributor` gate now admits the user.
+    """
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+    from app import db
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        _reset_outbound()
+        # Sign in a fresh OTC user — lands pending.
+        client.post("/auth/otc/request", json={"email": "promoted@example.com"})
+        code = _outbound_otc_codes("promoted@example.com")[-1]
+        client.post("/auth/otc/verify", json={"email": "promoted@example.com", "code": code})
+
+        # Before the grant: propose refused with 403.
+        r = client.post(
+            "/api/rfcs/propose",
+            json={"title": "T", "slug": "t-pre", "pitch": "p", "tags": []},
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 403
+
+        # The admin gesture (v0.8.0 shape — direct UPDATE; v0.9.0 will
+        # ship a UI). The test stamps `permission_decided_by` and
+        # `permission_decided_at` as the v0.9.0 admin UI will, so the
+        # column population exercises the schema slot. user_id=99 is
+        # a placeholder admin row — provision it so the FK resolves.
+        provision_user_row(user_id=99, login="adminuser", role="admin")
+        db.conn().execute(
+            """
+            UPDATE users
+               SET permission_state = 'granted',
+                   permission_decided_by = 99,
+                   permission_decided_at = datetime('now')
+             WHERE email = ?
+            """,
+            ("promoted@example.com",),
+        )
+
+        # The next request reads the fresh column from the DB. The
+        # propose endpoint reaches the route body now (it then refuses
+        # for a different reason — the slug 't-prop' will fail
+        # the slug-format check or hit a mock-gitea path — but the
+        # status code is _not_ 403/401, which is the v0.8.0 assertion).
+        r = client.post(
+            "/api/rfcs/propose",
+            json={"title": "Title", "slug": "tprop", "pitch": "Pitch text.", "tags": []},
+        )
+        assert r.status_code != 403, r.text
+        assert r.status_code != 401, r.text
+
+
+def test_grandfathered_user_is_unaffected_by_migration(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    """An existing `users` row at migration time has
+    `permission_state='granted'` via the column default. The
+    grandfathered user passes write endpoints without filing a
+    beta request and without the admin UI. v0.6.0 (anon-write
+    audit) is the v0.6.0 contract; v0.8.0 widens the gate but
+    does not break this case.
+    """
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+    from app import db
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        provision_user_row(user_id=5, login="oldhand", role="contributor")
+        # provision_user_row uses INSERT OR REPLACE INTO users with
+        # the column list it knows; permission_state is not in that
+        # list, so it picks up the column default ('granted') on
+        # insert. Confirm directly.
+        row = db.conn().execute(
+            "SELECT permission_state FROM users WHERE id = 5"
+        ).fetchone()
+        assert row["permission_state"] == "granted"
+
+        sign_in_as(
+            client,
+            user_id=5,
+            gitea_login="oldhand",
+            display_name="Old Hand",
+            role="contributor",
+        )
+
+        # Propose is write-shaped; the call should not refuse on
+        # the permission_state gate. (Subsequent failure modes —
+        # e.g. mock-gitea wiring — are not the v0.8.0 concern; this
+        # test asserts on the gate, not the propose body's success.)
+        r = client.post(
+            "/api/rfcs/propose",
+            json={"title": "Title", "slug": "gf-slug", "pitch": "Pitch.", "tags": []},
+        )
+        assert r.status_code != 403, r.text
+        assert r.status_code != 401, r.text
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# /auth/otc/request accepts any email — the v0.7.0 allowlist gate is gone
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+def test_otc_request_accepts_any_email_regardless_of_allowlist(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    """v0.7.0 silently dropped OTC requests for emails not on the
+    `allowed_emails` table. v0.8.0 reverses this: the request
+    endpoint sends a code to any valid email; admission gates at
+    `permission_state` post-verify instead. The `allowed_emails`
+    table stays in the schema as a fast-path bypass for
+    deployments that want to pre-mark known-good emails (the v0.9.0
+    admin user-management page will collapse the two surfaces).
+    """
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+    from app import db
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        _reset_outbound()
+        # Populate the allowlist with one specific email so the v0.7.0
+        # gate would have engaged. v0.8.0 ignores it for the request
+        # path.
+        db.conn().execute("INSERT INTO allowed_emails (email) VALUES (?)", ("known@example.com",))
+
+        # An email NOT on the allowlist still gets a code under v0.8.0.
+        r = client.post("/auth/otc/request", json={"email": "stranger@example.com"})
+        assert r.status_code == 200
+        codes = _outbound_otc_codes("stranger@example.com")
+        assert len(codes) == 1, "OTC code must be sent regardless of allowlist state"
+
+        # The row is there and the user can complete sign-in (and will
+        # land in 'pending' per the other tests).
+        row = db.conn().execute(
+            "SELECT 1 FROM otc_codes WHERE email = ?",
+            ("stranger@example.com",),
+        ).fetchone()
+        assert row is not None
+
+
+def test_allowlist_table_still_present_in_schema(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    """The schema migration leaves the `allowed_emails` table in
+    place — the admin UI from v0.3.0 still manages it for the
+    fast-path bypass deployments may use. This is a regression net
+    for "did the v0.8.0 cleanup accidentally drop the table"."""
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+    from app import db
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app):
+        # The table accepts inserts (i.e. it exists) — no schema check
+        # gymnastics needed.
+        db.conn().execute("INSERT INTO allowed_emails (email) VALUES (?)", ("kept@example.com",))
+        row = db.conn().execute(
+            "SELECT email FROM allowed_emails WHERE email = ?",
+            ("kept@example.com",),
+        ).fetchone()
+        assert row is not None

backend/tests/test_device_trust_vertical.py

@@ -0,0 +1,494 @@
+"""End-to-end integration tests for the v0.11.0 trust-device vertical
+(§6.2, roadmap item #9).
+
+After a successful OTC or passcode sign-in with `trust_device=true`
+on the body, the server mints a fresh `device_trust` row and sets the
+`rfc_device_trust` cookie. On a subsequent visit, the cookie carries
+a session re-established by `POST /auth/device-trust/start`. The
+tests below prove:
+
+  * `trust_device=false` (default, including omitted) on OTC verify
+    does NOT set the device-trust cookie and does NOT insert a row.
+  * `trust_device=true` on OTC verify DOES set the cookie (HttpOnly +
+    Secure + SameSite=Lax + 30-day Max-Age) and DOES insert a row.
+    The row's hash is NOT the raw token; only the hash lives in the
+    database.
+  * Same shape for passcode verify.
+  * On a returning visit with the cookie, `POST /auth/device-trust/start`
+    re-establishes the session — `GET /api/auth/me` reads the right
+    user without an OTC roundtrip.
+  * `last_seen_at` refreshes on a successful lookup.
+  * `POST /auth/device-trust/start` with no cookie returns 401.
+  * `POST /auth/device-trust/start` with a forged / unknown cookie
+    returns 401 + clears the cookie.
+  * A revoked row refuses the cookie (401) and clears it.
+  * An expired row refuses the cookie (401) and clears it.
+  * `GET /api/auth/me/devices` lists the user's active rows.
+  * `DELETE /api/auth/me/devices/{id}` revokes a single row.
+  * `DELETE /api/auth/me/devices/{id}` for another user's row reads 404.
+  * `DELETE /api/auth/me/devices` revokes every active row.
+  * Constant-time path: bcrypt.checkpw guards lookup; the raw token
+    is never written to logs or to the DB.
+
+The fakes from `test_propose_vertical` give us a working app harness.
+The OTC envelope buffer from `test_otc_vertical` is reused for the
+OTC roundtrips this suite needs.
+"""
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import pytest
+
+from test_propose_vertical import (  # noqa: F401
+    FakeGitea,
+    app_with_fake_gitea,
+    provision_user_row,
+    tmp_env,
+)
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Helpers — mirror the OTC suite's outbound-buffer helpers.
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+COOKIE_NAME = "rfc_device_trust"
+
+# The device-trust cookie is set with Secure=True, which httpx (the
+# TestClient's underlying transport) will only return on an https
+# scheme. We use a `base_url="https://testserver"` so the cookie
+# roundtrips faithfully — that mirrors how production deployments
+# serve the framework (per the v0.11.0 upgrade-step requiring HTTPS).
+HTTPS_BASE = "https://testserver"
+
+
+def _reset_outbound():
+    from app import email as email_mod
+    email_mod.reset_sent_envelopes()
+
+
+def _outbound_otc_codes(to_address: str | None = None) -> list[str]:
+    from app import email as email_mod
+    out = []
+    for env in email_mod.sent_envelopes():
+        if env.get("kind") != "otc":
+            continue
+        if to_address is not None and env["to"] != to_address:
+            continue
+        for line in env["body"].splitlines():
+            tok = line.strip()
+            if tok.isdigit() and len(tok) == 6:
+                out.append(tok)
+                break
+    return out
+
+
+def _sign_in_via_otc(client, email: str, *, trust_device: bool = False) -> None:
+    r = client.post("/auth/otc/request", json={"email": email})
+    assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
+    code = _outbound_otc_codes(email)[-1]
+    body = {"email": email, "code": code, "trust_device": trust_device}
+    r = client.post("/auth/otc/verify", json=body)
+    assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
+
+
+def _device_rows_for_email(email: str) -> list[dict]:
+    from app import db
+    rows = db.conn().execute(
+        """
+        SELECT dt.*
+          FROM device_trust dt
+          JOIN users u ON u.id = dt.user_id
+         WHERE u.email = ? COLLATE NOCASE
+         ORDER BY dt.id
+        """,
+        (email,),
+    ).fetchall()
+    return [dict(r) for r in rows]
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# trust_device flag controls cookie issuance
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+def test_otc_verify_without_trust_device_does_not_issue_cookie(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app, base_url=HTTPS_BASE) as client:
+        _reset_outbound()
+        _sign_in_via_otc(client, "alice@example.com", trust_device=False)
+        # No cookie set on the response.
+        assert COOKIE_NAME not in {c.name for c in client.cookies.jar}
+        # No row inserted.
+        assert _device_rows_for_email("alice@example.com") == []
+
+
+def test_otc_verify_with_trust_device_issues_cookie_and_row(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app, base_url=HTTPS_BASE) as client:
+        _reset_outbound()
+        r = client.post("/auth/otc/request", json={"email": "alice@example.com"})
+        assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
+        code = _outbound_otc_codes("alice@example.com")[-1]
+        r = client.post(
+            "/auth/otc/verify",
+            json={"email": "alice@example.com", "code": code, "trust_device": True},
+            headers={"User-Agent": "Mozilla/5.0 (TestBrowser)"},
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
+
+        # Cookie present on the response.
+        set_cookie = r.headers.get("set-cookie", "")
+        assert COOKIE_NAME in set_cookie
+        # Cookie attribute set asserts the spec'd shape. Starlette emits
+        # the attribute names case-insensitively (`samesite=lax`,
+        # `httponly`); we normalize when asserting.
+        lower = set_cookie.lower()
+        assert "httponly" in lower
+        assert "secure" in lower
+        assert "samesite=lax" in lower
+        assert "max-age=" in lower
+
+        # Row inserted; hash is not the raw token.
+        rows = _device_rows_for_email("alice@example.com")
+        assert len(rows) == 1
+        row = rows[0]
+        assert row["revoked_at"] is None
+        assert row["user_agent"] == "Mozilla/5.0 (TestBrowser)"
+        cookie_token = client.cookies.get(COOKIE_NAME)
+        assert cookie_token
+        assert cookie_token != row["device_token_hash"]
+        # bcrypt hash shape (starts with $2)
+        assert row["device_token_hash"].startswith("$2")
+
+
+def test_passcode_verify_with_trust_device_issues_cookie(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app, base_url=HTTPS_BASE) as client:
+        _reset_outbound()
+        _sign_in_via_otc(client, "alice@example.com")
+
+        # Set a passcode.
+        r = client.post("/auth/passcode/set", json={"passcode": "secret123"})
+        assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
+
+        # Sign out so the passcode verify path is the active sign-in.
+        client.cookies.clear()
+
+        # Passcode verify with trust_device=true issues a row.
+        r = client.post(
+            "/auth/passcode/verify",
+            json={"email": "alice@example.com", "passcode": "secret123", "trust_device": True},
+            headers={"User-Agent": "Test/Phone"},
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
+        set_cookie = r.headers.get("set-cookie", "")
+        assert COOKIE_NAME in set_cookie
+
+        rows = _device_rows_for_email("alice@example.com")
+        assert len(rows) == 1
+        assert rows[0]["user_agent"] == "Test/Phone"
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# /auth/device-trust/start
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+def test_device_trust_start_with_no_cookie_returns_401(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app, base_url=HTTPS_BASE) as client:
+        r = client.post("/auth/device-trust/start")
+        assert r.status_code == 401
+
+
+def test_device_trust_start_with_valid_cookie_establishes_session(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app, base_url=HTTPS_BASE) as client:
+        _reset_outbound()
+        # Trust the device.
+        r = client.post("/auth/otc/request", json={"email": "alice@example.com"})
+        assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
+        code = _outbound_otc_codes("alice@example.com")[-1]
+        r = client.post(
+            "/auth/otc/verify",
+            json={"email": "alice@example.com", "code": code, "trust_device": True},
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
+        trust_cookie = client.cookies.get(COOKIE_NAME)
+        assert trust_cookie
+
+        # Clear the session cookie so only the device-trust cookie is in
+        # play. We keep `rfc_device_trust` and drop `rfc_session`.
+        for cookie in list(client.cookies.jar):
+            if cookie.name != COOKIE_NAME:
+                client.cookies.jar.clear(cookie.domain, cookie.path, cookie.name)
+
+        # The session cookie is gone — /api/auth/me reads anonymous.
+        me = client.get("/api/auth/me").json()
+        assert me["authenticated"] is False
+
+        # Hit the trust-start endpoint; the cookie re-establishes the session.
+        r = client.post("/auth/device-trust/start")
+        assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
+        assert r.json()["user"]["email"] == "alice@example.com"
+
+        # /api/auth/me now reads authenticated.
+        me = client.get("/api/auth/me").json()
+        assert me["authenticated"] is True
+        assert me["user"]["email"] == "alice@example.com"
+
+
+def test_device_trust_start_refreshes_last_seen_at(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+    from app import db
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app, base_url=HTTPS_BASE) as client:
+        _reset_outbound()
+        r = client.post("/auth/otc/request", json={"email": "alice@example.com"})
+        assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
+        code = _outbound_otc_codes("alice@example.com")[-1]
+        r = client.post(
+            "/auth/otc/verify",
+            json={"email": "alice@example.com", "code": code, "trust_device": True},
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
+
+        # Force the existing row's last_seen_at into the past so we can
+        # assert the refresh moved it forward.
+        db.conn().execute(
+            """
+            UPDATE device_trust
+               SET last_seen_at = datetime('now', '-7 days')
+            """
+        )
+
+        # Hit the start endpoint.
+        r = client.post("/auth/device-trust/start")
+        assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
+
+        # last_seen_at is now recent (within the last minute).
+        row = db.conn().execute(
+            "SELECT last_seen_at, datetime('now') >= datetime(last_seen_at, '-1 minute') AS fresh FROM device_trust LIMIT 1"
+        ).fetchone()
+        assert row["fresh"] == 1
+
+
+def test_device_trust_start_with_revoked_row_refuses_and_clears(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+    from app import db
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app, base_url=HTTPS_BASE) as client:
+        _reset_outbound()
+        r = client.post("/auth/otc/request", json={"email": "alice@example.com"})
+        assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
+        code = _outbound_otc_codes("alice@example.com")[-1]
+        r = client.post(
+            "/auth/otc/verify",
+            json={"email": "alice@example.com", "code": code, "trust_device": True},
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
+
+        # Revoke the row out-of-band.
+        db.conn().execute(
+            "UPDATE device_trust SET revoked_at = datetime('now')"
+        )
+
+        # Now the start endpoint refuses + clears the cookie.
+        r = client.post("/auth/device-trust/start")
+        assert r.status_code == 401
+        # The cookie is cleared via a Set-Cookie header with Max-Age=0
+        # (Starlette's `delete_cookie` shape).
+        set_cookie = r.headers.get("set-cookie", "")
+        assert COOKIE_NAME in set_cookie
+        assert "Max-Age=0" in set_cookie or 'expires=Thu, 01 Jan 1970' in set_cookie.lower().replace("expires=thu", "expires=Thu")
+
+
+def test_device_trust_start_with_expired_row_refuses_and_clears(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+    from app import db
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app, base_url=HTTPS_BASE) as client:
+        _reset_outbound()
+        r = client.post("/auth/otc/request", json={"email": "alice@example.com"})
+        assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
+        code = _outbound_otc_codes("alice@example.com")[-1]
+        r = client.post(
+            "/auth/otc/verify",
+            json={"email": "alice@example.com", "code": code, "trust_device": True},
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
+
+        # Backdate the expiry into the past.
+        db.conn().execute(
+            "UPDATE device_trust SET expires_at = datetime('now', '-1 day')"
+        )
+
+        r = client.post("/auth/device-trust/start")
+        assert r.status_code == 401
+        set_cookie = r.headers.get("set-cookie", "")
+        assert COOKIE_NAME in set_cookie
+
+
+def test_device_trust_start_with_forged_cookie_refuses_and_clears(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app, base_url=HTTPS_BASE) as client:
+        # No real row; just paste a cookie value.
+        client.cookies.set(COOKIE_NAME, "definitely-not-a-real-token-value-xxx")
+        r = client.post("/auth/device-trust/start")
+        assert r.status_code == 401
+        set_cookie = r.headers.get("set-cookie", "")
+        assert COOKIE_NAME in set_cookie
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# /api/auth/me/devices — list + revoke
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+def test_list_devices_requires_session(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app, base_url=HTTPS_BASE) as client:
+        r = client.get("/api/auth/me/devices")
+        assert r.status_code == 401
+
+
+def test_list_devices_returns_active_rows_only(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+    from app import db
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app, base_url=HTTPS_BASE) as client:
+        _reset_outbound()
+        _sign_in_via_otc(client, "alice@example.com", trust_device=True)
+
+        # Add a second trusted device by re-running the verify flow.
+        # OTC has a per-email cooldown, so drop the cooldown rather
+        # than waiting it out.
+        db.conn().execute("UPDATE otc_codes SET consumed_at = datetime('now', '-1 hour'), created_at = datetime('now', '-1 hour')")
+        r = client.post("/auth/otc/request", json={"email": "alice@example.com"})
+        assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
+        code = _outbound_otc_codes("alice@example.com")[-1]
+        r = client.post(
+            "/auth/otc/verify",
+            json={"email": "alice@example.com", "code": code, "trust_device": True},
+            headers={"User-Agent": "Test/Tablet"},
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
+
+        # Revoke one row directly.
+        db.conn().execute(
+            "UPDATE device_trust SET revoked_at = datetime('now') WHERE id = 1"
+        )
+
+        # /api/auth/me/devices returns only the un-revoked one.
+        r = client.get("/api/auth/me/devices")
+        assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
+        items = r.json()["items"]
+        assert len(items) == 1
+        assert items[0]["user_agent"] == "Test/Tablet"
+
+
+def test_revoke_single_device_kills_the_row(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+    from app import db
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app, base_url=HTTPS_BASE) as client:
+        _reset_outbound()
+        _sign_in_via_otc(client, "alice@example.com", trust_device=True)
+
+        r = client.get("/api/auth/me/devices")
+        assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
+        items = r.json()["items"]
+        assert len(items) == 1
+        device_id = items[0]["id"]
+
+        # Revoke it.
+        r = client.delete(f"/api/auth/me/devices/{device_id}")
+        assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
+
+        # List is empty.
+        r = client.get("/api/auth/me/devices")
+        assert r.json()["items"] == []
+
+        # The row in the table has revoked_at populated.
+        row = db.conn().execute(
+            "SELECT revoked_at FROM device_trust WHERE id = ?", (device_id,)
+        ).fetchone()
+        assert row["revoked_at"] is not None
+
+
+def test_revoke_other_users_device_reads_404(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+    from app import db
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app, base_url=HTTPS_BASE) as client:
+        _reset_outbound()
+        # Alice trusts a device.
+        _sign_in_via_otc(client, "alice@example.com", trust_device=True)
+        alice_device_id = client.get("/api/auth/me/devices").json()["items"][0]["id"]
+
+        # Bob signs in (without a trusted device of his own).
+        client.cookies.clear()
+        db.conn().execute("UPDATE otc_codes SET consumed_at = datetime('now', '-1 hour'), created_at = datetime('now', '-1 hour')")
+        _sign_in_via_otc(client, "bob@example.com", trust_device=False)
+
+        # Bob tries to revoke Alice's row by id.
+        r = client.delete(f"/api/auth/me/devices/{alice_device_id}")
+        assert r.status_code == 404
+
+        # Alice's row is still active.
+        row = db.conn().execute(
+            "SELECT revoked_at FROM device_trust WHERE id = ?", (alice_device_id,)
+        ).fetchone()
+        assert row["revoked_at"] is None
+
+
+def test_revoke_all_devices_kills_every_active_row(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+    from app import db
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app, base_url=HTTPS_BASE) as client:
+        _reset_outbound()
+        _sign_in_via_otc(client, "alice@example.com", trust_device=True)
+
+        # Add a second device.
+        db.conn().execute("UPDATE otc_codes SET consumed_at = datetime('now', '-1 hour'), created_at = datetime('now', '-1 hour')")
+        r = client.post("/auth/otc/request", json={"email": "alice@example.com"})
+        assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
+        code = _outbound_otc_codes("alice@example.com")[-1]
+        r = client.post(
+            "/auth/otc/verify",
+            json={"email": "alice@example.com", "code": code, "trust_device": True},
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
+
+        # Two active rows.
+        assert len(client.get("/api/auth/me/devices").json()["items"]) == 2
+
+        # Revoke all.
+        r = client.delete("/api/auth/me/devices")
+        assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
+        assert r.json()["revoked"] == 2
+
+        # List is empty.
+        assert client.get("/api/auth/me/devices").json()["items"] == []

backend/tests/test_e2e_smoke.py

@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ import pytest
 from test_propose_vertical import (  # noqa: F401
     FakeGitea,
     app_with_fake_gitea,
+    grant_rfc_collaborator,
     provision_user_row,
     sign_in_as,
     tmp_env,
@@ -131,6 +132,11 @@ def test_full_user_lifecycle_propose_through_hygiene(app_with_fake_gitea):
         assert d["repo"] == "wiggleverse/rfc-0001-ohm"
 
         # --- 8. Alice opens a PR on the now-active RFC's per-RFC repo. ---
+        # v0.16.0 (item #12): ben is the RFC owner now; alice needs a
+        # per-RFC contributor invitation to cut a branch. In the
+        # production flow, ben would invite her via /invitations and
+        # she'd accept; we shortcut to the same end-state.
+        grant_rfc_collaborator(user_id=2, rfc_slug="ohm", role_in_rfc="contributor")
         sign_in_as(client, user_id=2, gitea_login="alice",
                    display_name="Alice", role="contributor", email="alice@test")
         r = client.post("/api/rfcs/ohm/branches/main/promote-to-branch", json={})

backend/tests/test_graduation_vertical.py

@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ import pytest
 from test_propose_vertical import (  # noqa: F401
     FakeGitea,
     app_with_fake_gitea,
+    grant_rfc_collaborator,
     provision_user_row,
     sign_in_as,
     tmp_env,
@@ -248,6 +249,9 @@ def test_graduate_refuses_when_body_edit_pr_open(app_with_fake_gitea):
         provision_user_row(user_id=2, login="alice", role="contributor")
         seed_owned_super_draft(fake, slug="ohm", title="OHM",
                                pitch=PITCH, owners=["ben"])
+        # v0.16.0 (item #12): ben is the RFC owner; alice needs a per-RFC
+        # contributor invitation to cut an edit branch on the super-draft.
+        grant_rfc_collaborator(user_id=2, rfc_slug="ohm", role_in_rfc="contributor")
         sign_in_as(client, user_id=2, gitea_login="alice",
                    display_name="Alice", role="contributor")
 
@@ -497,6 +501,8 @@ def test_pre_graduation_history_surfaces_edit_branch_threads(app_with_fake_gitea
         provision_user_row(user_id=2, login="alice", role="contributor")
         seed_owned_super_draft(fake, slug="ohm", title="OHM",
                                pitch=PITCH, owners=["ben"])
+        # v0.16.0 (item #12): alice needs per-RFC contributor access.
+        grant_rfc_collaborator(user_id=2, rfc_slug="ohm", role_in_rfc="contributor")
 
         # Alice cuts an edit branch and starts chatting on it.
         sign_in_as(client, user_id=2, gitea_login="alice",

backend/tests/test_otc_vertical.py

@@ -13,9 +13,13 @@ sign-in path. The tests prove:
   * Expired codes refuse with 400.
   * Already-consumed codes refuse with 400 on re-use.
   * Wrong codes refuse with 400.
-  * Allowlist gate: when `allowed_emails` is populated and the email
-    isn't on it, the response is still 202 (no leak), but no email
-    lands in the outbound buffer and verify finds no matching code.
+  * Allowlist gate (v0.8.0 update): v0.7.0 silently dropped requests
+    for emails not on `allowed_emails`. v0.8.0 (item #6) removed
+    that gate from the request path; the admission gate is now
+    `permission_state` on the freshly-provisioned `users` row,
+    asserted in test_beta_access_vertical.py. The tests below
+    confirm v0.8.0's open-request shape for both on-list and
+    off-list emails.
   * Migration link: an existing OAuth-era user (with a `users.email`
     row) is linked by email on first OTC sign-in — `gitea_id` is
     preserved.
@@ -201,33 +205,45 @@ def test_otc_request_cooldown_is_per_email_not_global(app_with_fake_gitea):
 
 
 # ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-# Allowlist gate
+# Allowlist gate — v0.8.0 update
+#
+# v0.7.0 gated the OTC request endpoint on the `allowed_emails` table:
+# emails not on the list got a silent drop (still 202, but no code).
+# v0.8.0 (roadmap item #6) reverses this: the request endpoint
+# accepts any valid email and sends a code. The admission gate moves
+# to `permission_state` on the freshly-provisioned `users` row,
+# which the next-tier tests in test_beta_access_vertical.py cover.
+# The `allowed_emails` table stays in the schema as a fast-path
+# bypass for admin convenience.
 # ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
 
-def test_otc_request_silently_drops_when_email_not_on_allowlist(app_with_fake_gitea):
+def test_otc_request_admits_emails_regardless_of_allowlist_population(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    """v0.8.0: the OTC request path no longer consults `allowed_emails`.
+    Whether the allowlist is empty or populated, every valid email
+    receives a code; admission gates at `permission_state` post-verify.
+    """
     from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
     from app import db
 
     app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
     with TestClient(app) as client:
         _reset_outbound()
-        # Populate the allowlist so the gate turns on.
+        # Populate the allowlist with one specific email; the v0.7.0
+        # gate would have engaged here.
         db.conn().execute("INSERT INTO allowed_emails (email) VALUES (?)", ("invited@example.com",))
 
+        # The not-on-list email still gets a code under v0.8.0.
         r = client.post("/auth/otc/request", json={"email": "stranger@example.com"})
-        # Still 202 — the allowlist's state is not leaked to callers.
         assert r.status_code == 200
-        # But no email was sent, and no row landed in otc_codes.
-        assert _outbound_otc_codes("stranger@example.com") == []
-        row = db.conn().execute(
-            "SELECT 1 FROM otc_codes WHERE email = ?",
-            ("stranger@example.com",),
-        ).fetchone()
-        assert row is None
+        assert len(_outbound_otc_codes("stranger@example.com")) == 1
 
 
 def test_otc_request_admits_allowlisted_email(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    """v0.8.0: still works for emails that happen to be on the legacy
+    allowlist — the table is no longer consulted at request time but
+    populated rows are admitted alongside everyone else (since the
+    gate is now open at the request surface)."""
     from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
     from app import db
 

backend/tests/test_passcode_vertical.py

@@ -0,0 +1,532 @@
+"""End-to-end integration tests for the v0.10.0 user-set passcode
+vertical (§6.2, roadmap item #8).
+
+After a successful OTC sign-in the user can set a passcode and use
+email + passcode for subsequent sign-ins. OTC remains the structural
+fallback — these tests prove:
+
+  * `/auth/passcode/set` requires an active session.
+  * `/auth/passcode/check` returns `has_passcode` without leaking the
+    hash, the set-at stamp, or the lockout state.
+  * Happy path: OTC sign-in → set passcode → sign out → email +
+    passcode signs in (no OTC roundtrip).
+  * Wrong passcode increments the failure counter without locking.
+  * Five consecutive failures lock the passcode path (HTTP 423) and
+    persist `passcode_locked_until` on the user row.
+  * The lockout expires after `passcode_locked_until`; a verify
+    attempt past the window succeeds again and clears the counter.
+  * The OTC path is unaffected by the passcode lockout — a user
+    whose passcode is locked can still request and verify a fresh
+    OTC to sign in.
+  * Clearing the passcode wipes the hash; subsequent verify refuses
+    with the no-passcode failure shape.
+  * Setting a new passcode replaces the prior one (and resets the
+    failure counter / lockout state).
+  * `passcode_set_at` updates on every set call.
+  * The validation denylist refuses obvious patterns (e.g. `0000`,
+    `1234`).
+  * Passcode length is enforced (4-20).
+
+The fakes from `test_propose_vertical` give us a working app harness.
+The OTC envelope buffer from `test_otc_vertical` is reused for the
+OTC roundtrips this suite needs.
+"""
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import pytest
+
+from test_propose_vertical import (  # noqa: F401
+    FakeGitea,
+    app_with_fake_gitea,
+    provision_user_row,
+    tmp_env,
+)
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Helpers — mirror the OTC suite's outbound-buffer helpers.
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+def _reset_outbound():
+    from app import email as email_mod
+    email_mod.reset_sent_envelopes()
+
+
+def _outbound_otc_codes(to_address: str | None = None) -> list[str]:
+    from app import email as email_mod
+    out = []
+    for env in email_mod.sent_envelopes():
+        if env.get("kind") != "otc":
+            continue
+        if to_address is not None and env["to"] != to_address:
+            continue
+        for line in env["body"].splitlines():
+            tok = line.strip()
+            if tok.isdigit() and len(tok) == 6:
+                out.append(tok)
+                break
+    return out
+
+
+def _sign_in_via_otc(client, email: str) -> None:
+    """Run an OTC request+verify so the client carries an authenticated
+    session. The cooldown is irrelevant on a fresh email; we don't
+    need to drop it."""
+    r = client.post("/auth/otc/request", json={"email": email})
+    assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
+    code = _outbound_otc_codes(email)[-1]
+    r = client.post("/auth/otc/verify", json={"email": email, "code": code})
+    assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Set passcode — auth-required, happy path
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+def test_set_passcode_requires_session(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        r = client.post("/auth/passcode/set", json={"passcode": "secret123"})
+        assert r.status_code == 401
+
+
+def test_set_passcode_after_otc_landing_persists_hash(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+    from app import db
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        _reset_outbound()
+        _sign_in_via_otc(client, "alice@example.com")
+
+        r = client.post("/auth/passcode/set", json={"passcode": "secret123"})
+        assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
+
+        row = db.conn().execute(
+            "SELECT passcode_hash, passcode_set_at FROM users WHERE email = ? COLLATE NOCASE",
+            ("alice@example.com",),
+        ).fetchone()
+        assert row is not None
+        assert row["passcode_hash"] is not None
+        # Not the plaintext.
+        assert row["passcode_hash"] != "secret123"
+        assert row["passcode_set_at"] is not None
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Check endpoint — leak-free shape
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+def test_check_endpoint_returns_false_for_unknown_email(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        r = client.get("/auth/passcode/check", params={"email": "nobody@example.com"})
+        assert r.status_code == 200
+        assert r.json() == {"has_passcode": False}
+
+
+def test_check_endpoint_returns_false_for_user_without_passcode(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        _reset_outbound()
+        _sign_in_via_otc(client, "bob@example.com")
+
+        r = client.get("/auth/passcode/check", params={"email": "bob@example.com"})
+        assert r.status_code == 200
+        assert r.json() == {"has_passcode": False}
+
+
+def test_check_endpoint_returns_true_after_set(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        _reset_outbound()
+        _sign_in_via_otc(client, "carol@example.com")
+        client.post("/auth/passcode/set", json={"passcode": "letmein9"})
+
+        # Drop the session so the check is read in the anonymous shape.
+        client.cookies.clear()
+        r = client.get("/auth/passcode/check", params={"email": "carol@example.com"})
+        assert r.status_code == 200
+        assert r.json() == {"has_passcode": True}
+        # The response carries ONLY the boolean — no hash, no stamp.
+        assert set(r.json().keys()) == {"has_passcode"}
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Verify path — happy path
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+def test_verify_passcode_signs_in_user(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        _reset_outbound()
+        _sign_in_via_otc(client, "dave@example.com")
+        client.post("/auth/passcode/set", json={"passcode": "secret123"})
+        client.cookies.clear()
+
+        r = client.post(
+            "/auth/passcode/verify",
+            json={"email": "dave@example.com", "passcode": "secret123"},
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
+        me = client.get("/api/auth/me").json()
+        assert me["authenticated"] is True
+        assert me["user"]["email"] == "dave@example.com"
+        assert me["user"]["has_passcode"] is True
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Verify path — failure modes
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+def test_verify_passcode_wrong_increments_counter_without_locking(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+    from app import db
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        _reset_outbound()
+        _sign_in_via_otc(client, "erin@example.com")
+        client.post("/auth/passcode/set", json={"passcode": "secret123"})
+        client.cookies.clear()
+
+        # Three bad attempts — under the lockout threshold.
+        for _ in range(3):
+            r = client.post(
+                "/auth/passcode/verify",
+                json={"email": "erin@example.com", "passcode": "wrongwrong"},
+            )
+            assert r.status_code == 400
+
+        row = db.conn().execute(
+            "SELECT passcode_failed_attempts, passcode_locked_until FROM users WHERE email = ?",
+            ("erin@example.com",),
+        ).fetchone()
+        assert row["passcode_failed_attempts"] == 3
+        assert row["passcode_locked_until"] is None
+
+
+def test_verify_passcode_locks_after_five_failures(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+    from app import db
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        _reset_outbound()
+        _sign_in_via_otc(client, "frank@example.com")
+        client.post("/auth/passcode/set", json={"passcode": "secret123"})
+        client.cookies.clear()
+
+        # Five bad attempts — the last crosses the threshold and the
+        # response shape flips to 423.
+        statuses = []
+        for _ in range(5):
+            r = client.post(
+                "/auth/passcode/verify",
+                json={"email": "frank@example.com", "passcode": "wrongwrong"},
+            )
+            statuses.append(r.status_code)
+        # First four are 400, the fifth (threshold-crossing) is 423.
+        assert statuses == [400, 400, 400, 400, 423]
+
+        row = db.conn().execute(
+            "SELECT passcode_failed_attempts, passcode_locked_until FROM users WHERE email = ?",
+            ("frank@example.com",),
+        ).fetchone()
+        assert row["passcode_failed_attempts"] >= 5
+        assert row["passcode_locked_until"] is not None
+
+        # Sixth attempt — still locked, still 423, even with the correct
+        # passcode (lockout overrides the verify).
+        r = client.post(
+            "/auth/passcode/verify",
+            json={"email": "frank@example.com", "passcode": "secret123"},
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 423
+
+
+def test_verify_passcode_lockout_expires(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+    from app import db
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        _reset_outbound()
+        _sign_in_via_otc(client, "gina@example.com")
+        client.post("/auth/passcode/set", json={"passcode": "secret123"})
+        client.cookies.clear()
+
+        for _ in range(5):
+            client.post(
+                "/auth/passcode/verify",
+                json={"email": "gina@example.com", "passcode": "wrongwrong"},
+            )
+
+        # Backdate the lockout to the past so the next attempt clears it.
+        db.conn().execute(
+            """
+            UPDATE users
+               SET passcode_locked_until = datetime('now', '-1 minute')
+             WHERE email = ?
+            """,
+            ("gina@example.com",),
+        )
+
+        r = client.post(
+            "/auth/passcode/verify",
+            json={"email": "gina@example.com", "passcode": "secret123"},
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
+
+        # Lockout cleared, counter reset.
+        row = db.conn().execute(
+            "SELECT passcode_failed_attempts, passcode_locked_until FROM users WHERE email = ?",
+            ("gina@example.com",),
+        ).fetchone()
+        assert row["passcode_failed_attempts"] == 0
+        assert row["passcode_locked_until"] is None
+
+
+def test_otc_path_unaffected_by_passcode_lockout(app_with_fake_gitea, monkeypatch):
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+
+    # Drop the OTC cooldown so the second request lands without a 429.
+    # The cooldown is re-read from env on every `request_code` call so
+    # this takes effect mid-process.
+    monkeypatch.setenv("OTC_REQUEST_COOLDOWN_SECONDS", "0")
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        _reset_outbound()
+        _sign_in_via_otc(client, "harvey@example.com")
+        client.post("/auth/passcode/set", json={"passcode": "secret123"})
+        client.cookies.clear()
+
+        # Lock the passcode path.
+        for _ in range(5):
+            client.post(
+                "/auth/passcode/verify",
+                json={"email": "harvey@example.com", "passcode": "wrongwrong"},
+            )
+
+        # The OTC path is unaffected by the passcode lockout: the user
+        # can still request and verify a fresh code to sign in.
+        r = client.post("/auth/otc/request", json={"email": "harvey@example.com"})
+        assert r.status_code == 200
+        code = _outbound_otc_codes("harvey@example.com")[-1]
+        r = client.post("/auth/otc/verify", json={"email": "harvey@example.com", "code": code})
+        assert r.status_code == 200
+
+        # The user is now signed in via OTC even though the passcode
+        # path is locked. The /api/auth/me payload reflects this.
+        me = client.get("/api/auth/me").json()
+        assert me["authenticated"] is True
+        assert me["user"]["email"] == "harvey@example.com"
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Clear + replace
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+def test_clear_passcode_wipes_the_hash(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+    from app import db
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        _reset_outbound()
+        _sign_in_via_otc(client, "ivy@example.com")
+        client.post("/auth/passcode/set", json={"passcode": "secret123"})
+
+        r = client.delete("/auth/passcode")
+        assert r.status_code == 200
+
+        row = db.conn().execute(
+            "SELECT passcode_hash, passcode_set_at FROM users WHERE email = ?",
+            ("ivy@example.com",),
+        ).fetchone()
+        assert row["passcode_hash"] is None
+        assert row["passcode_set_at"] is None
+
+        # Verify against the cleared passcode refuses (no-passcode shape
+        # collapses to a generic 400).
+        client.cookies.clear()
+        r = client.post(
+            "/auth/passcode/verify",
+            json={"email": "ivy@example.com", "passcode": "secret123"},
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 400
+
+
+def test_setting_new_passcode_replaces_old(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        _reset_outbound()
+        _sign_in_via_otc(client, "jane@example.com")
+        client.post("/auth/passcode/set", json={"passcode": "secret123"})
+        # Replace.
+        r = client.post("/auth/passcode/set", json={"passcode": "newsecret9"})
+        assert r.status_code == 200
+
+        client.cookies.clear()
+
+        # Old passcode refuses.
+        r = client.post(
+            "/auth/passcode/verify",
+            json={"email": "jane@example.com", "passcode": "secret123"},
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 400
+
+        # New passcode signs in.
+        r = client.post(
+            "/auth/passcode/verify",
+            json={"email": "jane@example.com", "passcode": "newsecret9"},
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 200
+
+
+def test_setting_new_passcode_resets_lockout(app_with_fake_gitea, monkeypatch):
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+    from app import db
+
+    monkeypatch.setenv("OTC_REQUEST_COOLDOWN_SECONDS", "0")
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        _reset_outbound()
+        _sign_in_via_otc(client, "kate@example.com")
+        client.post("/auth/passcode/set", json={"passcode": "secret123"})
+
+        # Lock the passcode path with bad attempts (drop session first).
+        client.cookies.clear()
+        for _ in range(5):
+            client.post(
+                "/auth/passcode/verify",
+                json={"email": "kate@example.com", "passcode": "wrongwrong"},
+            )
+
+        row = db.conn().execute(
+            "SELECT passcode_locked_until FROM users WHERE email = ?",
+            ("kate@example.com",),
+        ).fetchone()
+        assert row["passcode_locked_until"] is not None
+
+        # Sign back in via OTC and reset the passcode.
+        r = client.post("/auth/otc/request", json={"email": "kate@example.com"})
+        assert r.status_code == 200
+        code = _outbound_otc_codes("kate@example.com")[-1]
+        r = client.post("/auth/otc/verify", json={"email": "kate@example.com", "code": code})
+        assert r.status_code == 200
+
+        r = client.post("/auth/passcode/set", json={"passcode": "freshcode9"})
+        assert r.status_code == 200
+
+        # Lockout cleared on set.
+        row = db.conn().execute(
+            "SELECT passcode_locked_until, passcode_failed_attempts FROM users WHERE email = ?",
+            ("kate@example.com",),
+        ).fetchone()
+        assert row["passcode_locked_until"] is None
+        assert row["passcode_failed_attempts"] == 0
+
+
+def test_passcode_set_at_updates_on_each_set(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+    from app import db
+    import time
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        _reset_outbound()
+        _sign_in_via_otc(client, "luke@example.com")
+
+        client.post("/auth/passcode/set", json={"passcode": "secret123"})
+        first_stamp = db.conn().execute(
+            "SELECT passcode_set_at FROM users WHERE email = ?",
+            ("luke@example.com",),
+        ).fetchone()["passcode_set_at"]
+        assert first_stamp is not None
+
+        # SQLite's datetime('now') has second precision; sleep so the
+        # stamp visibly advances on the next set.
+        time.sleep(1.1)
+
+        client.post("/auth/passcode/set", json={"passcode": "newcode99"})
+        second_stamp = db.conn().execute(
+            "SELECT passcode_set_at FROM users WHERE email = ?",
+            ("luke@example.com",),
+        ).fetchone()["passcode_set_at"]
+        assert second_stamp is not None
+        assert second_stamp >= first_stamp
+        # Lexicographic compare on ISO-8601 datetime strings works for
+        # the SQLite shape.
+        assert second_stamp > first_stamp
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Validation
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+def test_set_passcode_refuses_too_short(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        _reset_outbound()
+        _sign_in_via_otc(client, "mia@example.com")
+        r = client.post("/auth/passcode/set", json={"passcode": "abc"})
+        assert r.status_code == 422
+
+
+def test_set_passcode_refuses_denylist_pattern(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        _reset_outbound()
+        _sign_in_via_otc(client, "nick@example.com")
+        for bad in ["0000", "1234", "aaaa", "qwerty", "password"]:
+            r = client.post("/auth/passcode/set", json={"passcode": bad})
+            assert r.status_code == 422, f"expected 422 for {bad!r}, got {r.status_code}"
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Auth me payload
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+def test_auth_me_carries_has_passcode_flag(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        _reset_outbound()
+        _sign_in_via_otc(client, "olga@example.com")
+
+        me = client.get("/api/auth/me").json()
+        assert me["user"]["has_passcode"] is False
+        assert me["user"]["passcode_set_at"] is None
+
+        client.post("/auth/passcode/set", json={"passcode": "secret123"})
+        me = client.get("/api/auth/me").json()
+        assert me["user"]["has_passcode"] is True
+        assert me["user"]["passcode_set_at"] is not None

backend/tests/test_pr_flow_vertical.py

@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ import pytest
 from test_propose_vertical import (  # noqa: F401
     FakeGitea,
     app_with_fake_gitea,
+    grant_rfc_collaborator,
     provision_user_row,
     sign_in_as,
     tmp_env,
@@ -140,6 +141,9 @@ def test_get_pr_returns_three_column_payload(app_with_fake_gitea):
         provision_user_row(user_id=3, login="bob", role="contributor")
         seed_active_rfc(fake, slug="ohm", title="OHM", body=SEED_BODY)
         # Bob is the non-arbiter contributor — alice is seeded as an RFC owner.
+        # v0.16.0 (item #12): bob needs an accepted per-RFC contributor
+        # invitation to cut branches and open PRs on alice's RFC.
+        grant_rfc_collaborator(user_id=3, rfc_slug="ohm", role_in_rfc="contributor")
         sign_in_as(client, user_id=3, gitea_login="bob", display_name="Bob", role="contributor")
         branch, _ = _cut_branch_and_accept_change(
             client, fake, slug="ohm",
@@ -292,6 +296,9 @@ def test_merge_by_arbiter_advances_main_and_marks_pr_merged(app_with_fake_gitea)
         provision_user_row(user_id=1, login="ben", role="owner")
         seed_active_rfc(fake, slug="ohm", title="OHM", body=SEED_BODY)
         # Bob is neither owner nor arbiter — the non-merge baseline.
+        # v0.16.0 (item #12): bob still needs an accepted contributor
+        # invitation to cut the branch + open the PR.
+        grant_rfc_collaborator(user_id=3, rfc_slug="ohm", role_in_rfc="contributor")
         sign_in_as(client, user_id=3, gitea_login="bob", display_name="Bob", role="contributor")
         branch, _ = _cut_branch_and_accept_change(
             client, fake, slug="ohm",
@@ -364,6 +371,10 @@ def test_resolution_branch_replays_clean_and_supersedes_on_merge(app_with_fake_g
         provision_user_row(user_id=3, login="bob", role="contributor")
         provision_user_row(user_id=1, login="ben", role="owner")
         seed_active_rfc(fake, slug="ohm", title="OHM", body=SEED_BODY)
+        # v0.16.0 (item #12): bob (a non-owner contributor) needs an
+        # accepted per-RFC invitation to cut a branch on alice's RFC.
+        # Alice is the seeded RFC owner so she doesn't need one.
+        grant_rfc_collaborator(user_id=3, rfc_slug="ohm", role_in_rfc="contributor")
 
         # Alice cuts a branch and accepts a change on it.
         sign_in_as(client, user_id=2, gitea_login="alice", display_name="Alice", role="contributor")

backend/tests/test_propose_vertical.py

@@ -395,6 +395,28 @@ def provision_user_row(*, user_id: int, login: str, role: str) -> None:
     )
 
 
+def grant_rfc_collaborator(*, user_id: int, rfc_slug: str, role_in_rfc: str = "contributor") -> None:
+    """v0.16.0 / item #12 test seam: directly insert an accepted-
+    invitation collaborator row so a non-owner contributor can pass
+    the per-RFC write gate without going through the email round-trip.
+
+    Equivalent in effect to the invitation→accept dance the production
+    code drives; lets v0.5.0/v0.6.0/v0.8.0 era tests preserve their
+    "alice owns OHM, bob contributes" shape without rewriting the
+    setup. The invitation_id is left NULL — collaborators minted via
+    a direct admin gesture (a §19.2 candidate) carry the same shape.
+    """
+    from app import db
+    db.conn().execute(
+        """
+        INSERT OR REPLACE INTO rfc_collaborators
+            (rfc_slug, user_id, role_in_rfc, invitation_id)
+        VALUES (?, ?, ?, NULL)
+        """,
+        (rfc_slug, user_id, role_in_rfc),
+    )
+
+
 # ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 # Fixtures
 # ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

backend/tests/test_rfc_invitations_vertical.py

@@ -0,0 +1,658 @@
+"""End-to-end integration tests for v0.16.0's owner-only invite for
+per-RFC PR or PR-less discussion (roadmap item #12, §6 / §10).
+
+The release lands a per-RFC membership layer:
+
+  * `rfc_invitations` — issued by the RFC's owner, addressed to an
+    email, granting one of two roles ('contributor' or 'discussant').
+  * `rfc_collaborators` — the accepted-invitation substrate; the
+    table the per-RFC write gate consults.
+
+The tests prove:
+
+  * Only the RFC's owner (or a platform admin/owner) can invite —
+    a platform-granted but non-owner user gets 403.
+  * Creating an invitation lands a row, mints a token, and queues
+    an envelope on the SMTP buffer.
+  * Re-inviting the same (email, role) on the same RFC returns 409.
+  * The accept endpoint requires the accepting user's email to match
+    the invitee_email (case-insensitive).
+  * Acceptance lands a rfc_collaborators row and flips the
+    invitation to 'accepted'.
+  * Re-accepting the same invitation is idempotent (200, changed=false).
+  * An expired invitation refuses 409 even if the row's column status
+    is still 'pending'.
+  * A revoked invitation refuses 409.
+  * The owner's listing carries pending + accepted in one response.
+  * The per-RFC discussion-write gate refuses a non-invited
+    platform-granted user 403 (was previously 200 before v0.16.0).
+  * The same gate admits a user who holds an accepted 'discussant'
+    invitation.
+  * The same gate admits a user who holds an accepted 'contributor'
+    invitation (contributor strictly includes discussion).
+  * The platform admin/owner is admitted regardless of per-RFC
+    membership (the platform-level capability path).
+  * The /api/admin/users listing carries `rfc_invitations` per-user
+    after an acceptance — the §17 admin surface hook.
+"""
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+# Reuse fixtures and helpers from the propose / RFC-view harnesses.
+from test_propose_vertical import (  # noqa: F401 — fixtures land via import
+    FakeGitea,
+    app_with_fake_gitea,
+    provision_user_row,
+    sign_in_as,
+    tmp_env,
+)
+from test_rfc_view_vertical import seed_active_rfc, SEED_BODY
+
+
+def _reset_outbound():
+    from app import email as email_mod
+    email_mod.reset_sent_envelopes()
+
+
+def _invitation_envelopes(to_address: str | None = None) -> list[dict]:
+    """Pluck v0.16.0 invitation envelopes out of the shared _SENT buffer.
+    Same access pattern as the OTC tests use for `kind='otc'`."""
+    from app import email as email_mod
+    out = []
+    for env in email_mod.sent_envelopes():
+        if env.get("kind") != "rfc_invitation":
+            continue
+        if to_address is not None and env["to"] != to_address:
+            continue
+        out.append(env)
+    return out
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Create / list / revoke (owner-side)
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+def test_owner_can_invite_creates_row_and_sends_email(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    """The end-to-end create gesture: RFC owner posts an invitation,
+    a row lands, the token comes back in the response, and an
+    `rfc_invitation`-kind envelope hits the SMTP buffer."""
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+    from app import db
+
+    app, fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        _reset_outbound()
+        # The frontmatter owner of the seeded RFC is "alice" (per
+        # seed_active_rfc's default), so we sign in as that user.
+        provision_user_row(user_id=1, login="alice", role="contributor")
+        seed_active_rfc(fake, slug="ohm", title="OHM", body=SEED_BODY)
+        sign_in_as(
+            client, user_id=1, gitea_login="alice",
+            display_name="Alice", role="contributor",
+        )
+
+        r = client.post(
+            "/api/rfcs/ohm/invitations",
+            json={"invitee_email": "newperson@example.com", "role_in_rfc": "contributor"},
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
+        body = r.json()
+        assert body["rfc_slug"] == "ohm"
+        assert body["invitee_email"] == "newperson@example.com"
+        assert body["role_in_rfc"] == "contributor"
+        assert body["status"] == "pending"
+        assert body["token"] and len(body["token"]) > 16
+
+        # Row landed.
+        row = db.conn().execute(
+            "SELECT * FROM rfc_invitations WHERE id = ?", (body["id"],),
+        ).fetchone()
+        assert row["rfc_slug"] == "ohm"
+        assert row["invitee_email"] == "newperson@example.com"
+        assert row["inviter_user_id"] == 1
+        assert row["status"] == "pending"
+
+        # Email envelope went out.
+        envs = _invitation_envelopes("newperson@example.com")
+        assert len(envs) == 1
+        assert "OHM" in envs[0]["subject"]
+        assert body["token"] in envs[0]["body"]
+
+
+def test_non_owner_cannot_invite(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    """A platform-granted user who isn't in the RFC's frontmatter
+    owners list cannot invite — 403. Distinct from the
+    require_contributor gate (which would be 401 for anonymous)."""
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+
+    app, fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        # alice is the RFC owner per the seed; bob is a regular
+        # platform-granted contributor with no per-RFC role.
+        provision_user_row(user_id=1, login="alice", role="contributor")
+        provision_user_row(user_id=2, login="bob", role="contributor")
+        seed_active_rfc(fake, slug="ohm", title="OHM", body=SEED_BODY)
+        sign_in_as(
+            client, user_id=2, gitea_login="bob",
+            display_name="Bob", role="contributor",
+        )
+        r = client.post(
+            "/api/rfcs/ohm/invitations",
+            json={"invitee_email": "ignored@example.com", "role_in_rfc": "discussant"},
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 403
+
+
+def test_platform_admin_can_invite_to_any_rfc(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    """Per §6.1 the platform admin/owner role carries the maximal
+    per-RFC capability, so admins can invite on any RFC even if
+    they're not in its owners list."""
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+
+    app, fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        _reset_outbound()
+        provision_user_row(user_id=1, login="alice", role="contributor")
+        provision_user_row(user_id=99, login="adminzero", role="admin")
+        seed_active_rfc(fake, slug="ohm", title="OHM", body=SEED_BODY)
+        sign_in_as(
+            client, user_id=99, gitea_login="adminzero",
+            display_name="Admin Zero", role="admin",
+        )
+        r = client.post(
+            "/api/rfcs/ohm/invitations",
+            json={"invitee_email": "another@example.com", "role_in_rfc": "discussant"},
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
+
+
+def test_anonymous_cannot_invite(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+
+    app, fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        seed_active_rfc(fake, slug="ohm", title="OHM", body=SEED_BODY)
+        r = client.post(
+            "/api/rfcs/ohm/invitations",
+            json={"invitee_email": "x@example.com", "role_in_rfc": "discussant"},
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 401
+
+
+def test_re_invite_same_email_and_role_returns_409(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    """Refuse a duplicate pending invitation for the same (email, role)
+    on the same RFC. A different role on the same email is allowed
+    (the owner may want to upgrade discussant → contributor)."""
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+
+    app, fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        _reset_outbound()
+        provision_user_row(user_id=1, login="alice", role="contributor")
+        seed_active_rfc(fake, slug="ohm", title="OHM", body=SEED_BODY)
+        sign_in_as(
+            client, user_id=1, gitea_login="alice",
+            display_name="Alice", role="contributor",
+        )
+
+        r1 = client.post(
+            "/api/rfcs/ohm/invitations",
+            json={"invitee_email": "dup@example.com", "role_in_rfc": "discussant"},
+        )
+        assert r1.status_code == 200
+        r2 = client.post(
+            "/api/rfcs/ohm/invitations",
+            json={"invitee_email": "dup@example.com", "role_in_rfc": "discussant"},
+        )
+        assert r2.status_code == 409
+
+        # Same email, different role is allowed.
+        r3 = client.post(
+            "/api/rfcs/ohm/invitations",
+            json={"invitee_email": "dup@example.com", "role_in_rfc": "contributor"},
+        )
+        assert r3.status_code == 200
+
+
+def test_owner_can_list_invitations(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+
+    app, fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        _reset_outbound()
+        provision_user_row(user_id=1, login="alice", role="contributor")
+        seed_active_rfc(fake, slug="ohm", title="OHM", body=SEED_BODY)
+        sign_in_as(
+            client, user_id=1, gitea_login="alice",
+            display_name="Alice", role="contributor",
+        )
+
+        client.post("/api/rfcs/ohm/invitations",
+                    json={"invitee_email": "a@example.com", "role_in_rfc": "discussant"})
+        client.post("/api/rfcs/ohm/invitations",
+                    json={"invitee_email": "b@example.com", "role_in_rfc": "contributor"})
+
+        r = client.get("/api/rfcs/ohm/invitations")
+        assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
+        items = r.json()["items"]
+        emails = sorted(i["invitee_email"] for i in items)
+        assert emails == ["a@example.com", "b@example.com"]
+        assert all(i["status"] == "pending" for i in items)
+        # The inviter is named.
+        assert all(i["inviter_login"] == "alice" for i in items)
+
+
+def test_revoke_pending_invitation_works_already_accepted_refuses(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    """Revoke flips a pending invitation to 'revoked'. An already-
+    accepted invitation refuses 409 — accepted membership is removed
+    via a different (future) surface; the v0.16.0 revoke only lifts
+    the pending link."""
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+    from app import db
+
+    app, fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        _reset_outbound()
+        provision_user_row(user_id=1, login="alice", role="contributor")
+        seed_active_rfc(fake, slug="ohm", title="OHM", body=SEED_BODY)
+        sign_in_as(
+            client, user_id=1, gitea_login="alice",
+            display_name="Alice", role="contributor",
+        )
+
+        r = client.post(
+            "/api/rfcs/ohm/invitations",
+            json={"invitee_email": "revokee@example.com", "role_in_rfc": "discussant"},
+        )
+        invitation_id = r.json()["id"]
+
+        r = client.post(f"/api/rfcs/ohm/invitations/{invitation_id}/revoke")
+        assert r.status_code == 200
+        assert r.json()["status"] == "revoked"
+
+        # Re-revoke refuses 409.
+        r2 = client.post(f"/api/rfcs/ohm/invitations/{invitation_id}/revoke")
+        assert r2.status_code == 409
+
+        row = db.conn().execute(
+            "SELECT status FROM rfc_invitations WHERE id = ?", (invitation_id,),
+        ).fetchone()
+        assert row["status"] == "revoked"
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Accept (invitee-side)
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+def test_accept_invitation_lands_collaborator_row(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    """The end-to-end accept gesture: the invitee signs in, posts the
+    token, and an rfc_collaborators row lands at the issued role."""
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+    from app import db
+
+    app, fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        _reset_outbound()
+        provision_user_row(user_id=1, login="alice", role="contributor")
+        # provision_user_row sets the email to "<login>@test", so the
+        # invitee row we'll create needs the same email shape.
+        provision_user_row(user_id=2, login="newbie", role="contributor")
+        seed_active_rfc(fake, slug="ohm", title="OHM", body=SEED_BODY)
+
+        # alice (owner) invites newbie@test.
+        sign_in_as(
+            client, user_id=1, gitea_login="alice",
+            display_name="Alice", role="contributor",
+        )
+        r = client.post(
+            "/api/rfcs/ohm/invitations",
+            json={"invitee_email": "newbie@test", "role_in_rfc": "contributor"},
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
+        token = r.json()["token"]
+
+        # Switch to newbie, accept.
+        sign_in_as(
+            client, user_id=2, gitea_login="newbie",
+            display_name="Newbie", role="contributor",
+            email="newbie@test",
+        )
+        r = client.post("/api/invitations/accept", json={"token": token})
+        assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
+        body = r.json()
+        assert body["ok"] is True
+        assert body["changed"] is True
+        assert body["rfc_slug"] == "ohm"
+        assert body["role_in_rfc"] == "contributor"
+
+        # Collaborator row landed; invitation flipped.
+        collab = db.conn().execute(
+            "SELECT role_in_rfc FROM rfc_collaborators WHERE rfc_slug = 'ohm' AND user_id = 2",
+        ).fetchone()
+        assert collab is not None
+        assert collab["role_in_rfc"] == "contributor"
+
+        inv = db.conn().execute(
+            "SELECT status, accepted_by_user_id FROM rfc_invitations WHERE token = ?",
+            (token,),
+        ).fetchone()
+        assert inv["status"] == "accepted"
+        assert inv["accepted_by_user_id"] == 2
+
+
+def test_accept_refuses_when_email_does_not_match(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    """The accepting user's email must match the invitation's
+    invitee_email (case-insensitive)."""
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+
+    app, fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        _reset_outbound()
+        provision_user_row(user_id=1, login="alice", role="contributor")
+        provision_user_row(user_id=2, login="mallory", role="contributor")
+        seed_active_rfc(fake, slug="ohm", title="OHM", body=SEED_BODY)
+
+        sign_in_as(client, user_id=1, gitea_login="alice",
+                   display_name="Alice", role="contributor")
+        r = client.post(
+            "/api/rfcs/ohm/invitations",
+            json={"invitee_email": "intended@example.com", "role_in_rfc": "discussant"},
+        )
+        token = r.json()["token"]
+
+        # mallory's email is "mallory@test", not "intended@example.com".
+        sign_in_as(client, user_id=2, gitea_login="mallory",
+                   display_name="Mallory", role="contributor",
+                   email="mallory@test")
+        r = client.post("/api/invitations/accept", json={"token": token})
+        assert r.status_code == 403
+
+
+def test_accept_refuses_revoked_invitation(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+
+    app, fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        _reset_outbound()
+        provision_user_row(user_id=1, login="alice", role="contributor")
+        provision_user_row(user_id=2, login="newbie", role="contributor")
+        seed_active_rfc(fake, slug="ohm", title="OHM", body=SEED_BODY)
+
+        sign_in_as(client, user_id=1, gitea_login="alice",
+                   display_name="Alice", role="contributor")
+        r = client.post(
+            "/api/rfcs/ohm/invitations",
+            json={"invitee_email": "newbie@test", "role_in_rfc": "discussant"},
+        )
+        invitation_id = r.json()["id"]
+        token = r.json()["token"]
+
+        client.post(f"/api/rfcs/ohm/invitations/{invitation_id}/revoke")
+
+        sign_in_as(client, user_id=2, gitea_login="newbie",
+                   display_name="Newbie", role="contributor",
+                   email="newbie@test")
+        r = client.post("/api/invitations/accept", json={"token": token})
+        assert r.status_code == 409
+
+
+def test_accept_refuses_expired_invitation(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    """An invitation past its `expires_at` is refused 409 even if
+    the row's column status is still 'pending'. We backdate the
+    expires_at directly to model the elapsed-window state."""
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+    from app import db
+
+    app, fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        _reset_outbound()
+        provision_user_row(user_id=1, login="alice", role="contributor")
+        provision_user_row(user_id=2, login="newbie", role="contributor")
+        seed_active_rfc(fake, slug="ohm", title="OHM", body=SEED_BODY)
+
+        sign_in_as(client, user_id=1, gitea_login="alice",
+                   display_name="Alice", role="contributor")
+        r = client.post(
+            "/api/rfcs/ohm/invitations",
+            json={"invitee_email": "newbie@test", "role_in_rfc": "discussant"},
+        )
+        token = r.json()["token"]
+        invitation_id = r.json()["id"]
+
+        # Backdate.
+        db.conn().execute(
+            "UPDATE rfc_invitations SET expires_at = datetime('now', '-1 day') WHERE id = ?",
+            (invitation_id,),
+        )
+
+        sign_in_as(client, user_id=2, gitea_login="newbie",
+                   display_name="Newbie", role="contributor",
+                   email="newbie@test")
+        r = client.post("/api/invitations/accept", json={"token": token})
+        assert r.status_code == 409
+
+
+def test_accept_is_idempotent_on_re_accept(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    """Re-accepting the same already-accepted invitation reads as a
+    200 no-op with `changed=false`. The collaborator row is unchanged."""
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+    from app import db
+
+    app, fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        _reset_outbound()
+        provision_user_row(user_id=1, login="alice", role="contributor")
+        provision_user_row(user_id=2, login="newbie", role="contributor")
+        seed_active_rfc(fake, slug="ohm", title="OHM", body=SEED_BODY)
+
+        sign_in_as(client, user_id=1, gitea_login="alice",
+                   display_name="Alice", role="contributor")
+        r = client.post(
+            "/api/rfcs/ohm/invitations",
+            json={"invitee_email": "newbie@test", "role_in_rfc": "discussant"},
+        )
+        token = r.json()["token"]
+
+        sign_in_as(client, user_id=2, gitea_login="newbie",
+                   display_name="Newbie", role="contributor",
+                   email="newbie@test")
+        r1 = client.post("/api/invitations/accept", json={"token": token})
+        assert r1.status_code == 200
+        assert r1.json()["changed"] is True
+
+        r2 = client.post("/api/invitations/accept", json={"token": token})
+        assert r2.status_code == 200
+        assert r2.json()["changed"] is False
+
+        # Still exactly one collaborator row.
+        rows = db.conn().execute(
+            "SELECT COUNT(*) AS n FROM rfc_collaborators WHERE rfc_slug = 'ohm' AND user_id = 2"
+        ).fetchone()
+        assert rows["n"] == 1
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Discussion-write gate enforcement
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+def test_non_invited_user_cannot_post_to_discussion(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    """v0.16.0 narrows the discussion-write gate: a platform-granted
+    user with no per-RFC role gets 403 when posting to the
+    discussion. (v0.6.0 left the gate at require_contributor only;
+    item #12 layers can_discuss_rfc on top.)"""
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+
+    app, fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        provision_user_row(user_id=1, login="alice", role="contributor")
+        provision_user_row(user_id=2, login="bob", role="contributor")
+        seed_active_rfc(fake, slug="ohm", title="OHM", body=SEED_BODY)
+
+        # bob is platform-granted but not in OHM's owners list and has
+        # no invitation. The thread-create surface refuses 403.
+        sign_in_as(client, user_id=2, gitea_login="bob",
+                   display_name="Bob", role="contributor")
+        r = client.post(
+            "/api/rfcs/ohm/discussion/threads",
+            json={"label": "Question", "message": "Should I be allowed?"},
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 403
+
+
+def test_invited_discussant_can_post_to_discussion(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+
+    app, fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        _reset_outbound()
+        provision_user_row(user_id=1, login="alice", role="contributor")
+        provision_user_row(user_id=2, login="newbie", role="contributor")
+        seed_active_rfc(fake, slug="ohm", title="OHM", body=SEED_BODY)
+
+        # alice invites newbie as a discussant.
+        sign_in_as(client, user_id=1, gitea_login="alice",
+                   display_name="Alice", role="contributor")
+        r = client.post(
+            "/api/rfcs/ohm/invitations",
+            json={"invitee_email": "newbie@test", "role_in_rfc": "discussant"},
+        )
+        token = r.json()["token"]
+
+        # newbie accepts.
+        sign_in_as(client, user_id=2, gitea_login="newbie",
+                   display_name="Newbie", role="contributor",
+                   email="newbie@test")
+        client.post("/api/invitations/accept", json={"token": token})
+
+        # newbie can now post to the discussion.
+        r = client.post(
+            "/api/rfcs/ohm/discussion/threads",
+            json={"label": "Question", "message": "Now I can speak."},
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
+
+
+def test_contributor_role_includes_discussion(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    """A 'contributor' per-RFC role strictly includes discussion
+    permission — accepting a contributor invitation admits the user
+    to the discussion endpoint too."""
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+
+    app, fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        _reset_outbound()
+        provision_user_row(user_id=1, login="alice", role="contributor")
+        provision_user_row(user_id=2, login="newbie", role="contributor")
+        seed_active_rfc(fake, slug="ohm", title="OHM", body=SEED_BODY)
+
+        sign_in_as(client, user_id=1, gitea_login="alice",
+                   display_name="Alice", role="contributor")
+        r = client.post(
+            "/api/rfcs/ohm/invitations",
+            json={"invitee_email": "newbie@test", "role_in_rfc": "contributor"},
+        )
+        token = r.json()["token"]
+
+        sign_in_as(client, user_id=2, gitea_login="newbie",
+                   display_name="Newbie", role="contributor",
+                   email="newbie@test")
+        client.post("/api/invitations/accept", json={"token": token})
+
+        r = client.post(
+            "/api/rfcs/ohm/discussion/threads",
+            json={"label": "Q", "message": "Hello."},
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 200
+
+
+def test_platform_admin_can_post_to_discussion_without_invitation(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    """Per §6.1 / item #12's permission shape: platform admins/owners
+    can write to any RFC's discussion regardless of per-RFC
+    membership."""
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+
+    app, fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        provision_user_row(user_id=1, login="alice", role="contributor")
+        provision_user_row(user_id=99, login="adminzero", role="admin")
+        seed_active_rfc(fake, slug="ohm", title="OHM", body=SEED_BODY)
+
+        sign_in_as(client, user_id=99, gitea_login="adminzero",
+                   display_name="Admin Zero", role="admin")
+        r = client.post(
+            "/api/rfcs/ohm/discussion/threads",
+            json={"label": "Admin chime", "message": "Drive-by from admin."},
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 200
+
+
+def test_rfc_owner_can_post_to_discussion(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    """The frontmatter RFC owner is admitted by virtue of being on
+    the owners list — they don't need to invite themselves."""
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+
+    app, fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        provision_user_row(user_id=1, login="alice", role="contributor")
+        seed_active_rfc(fake, slug="ohm", title="OHM", body=SEED_BODY)
+        sign_in_as(client, user_id=1, gitea_login="alice",
+                   display_name="Alice", role="contributor")
+        r = client.post(
+            "/api/rfcs/ohm/discussion/threads",
+            json={"label": "Owner thought", "message": "Kicking off the conversation."},
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 200
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Admin-page hook (additive on /api/admin/users)
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+def test_admin_users_listing_surfaces_per_rfc_invitations(app_with_fake_gitea):
+    """v0.16.0 hook into the v0.9.0 admin user-management surface:
+    each user row carries an `rfc_invitations` array listing the
+    per-RFC roles they hold. Empty array for users without any."""
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+
+    app, fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        _reset_outbound()
+        provision_user_row(user_id=1, login="alice", role="contributor")
+        provision_user_row(user_id=2, login="newbie", role="contributor")
+        provision_user_row(user_id=99, login="adminzero", role="admin")
+        seed_active_rfc(fake, slug="ohm", title="OHM", body=SEED_BODY)
+
+        # alice invites newbie; newbie accepts.
+        sign_in_as(client, user_id=1, gitea_login="alice",
+                   display_name="Alice", role="contributor")
+        r = client.post(
+            "/api/rfcs/ohm/invitations",
+            json={"invitee_email": "newbie@test", "role_in_rfc": "contributor"},
+        )
+        token = r.json()["token"]
+
+        sign_in_as(client, user_id=2, gitea_login="newbie",
+                   display_name="Newbie", role="contributor",
+                   email="newbie@test")
+        client.post("/api/invitations/accept", json={"token": token})
+
+        # Admin lists.
+        sign_in_as(client, user_id=99, gitea_login="adminzero",
+                   display_name="Admin Zero", role="admin")
+        r = client.get("/api/admin/users")
+        assert r.status_code == 200
+        items = r.json()["items"]
+        newbie_row = next(i for i in items if i["gitea_login"] == "newbie")
+        assert isinstance(newbie_row["rfc_invitations"], list)
+        assert len(newbie_row["rfc_invitations"]) == 1
+        invite = newbie_row["rfc_invitations"][0]
+        assert invite["rfc_slug"] == "ohm"
+        assert invite["role_in_rfc"] == "contributor"
+        assert invite["inviter_login"] == "alice"
+
+        # Users with no invitations carry an empty array, not null.
+        alice_row = next(i for i in items if i["gitea_login"] == "alice")
+        assert alice_row["rfc_invitations"] == []

backend/tests/test_turnstile_vertical.py

@@ -0,0 +1,220 @@
+"""End-to-end integration tests for the v0.12.0 CloudFlare Turnstile
+gate on `/auth/otc/request` (§6.2 / roadmap item #10).
+
+The release gates the OTC request endpoint behind a one-step
+browser-side Turnstile challenge before the bcrypt hash + SMTP send.
+The tests prove:
+
+  * Happy path: with the secret set, a valid token admits the request
+    and the OTC envelope lands.
+  * Failure path: with the secret set, a token siteverify rejects
+    refuses the request with 400 and produces no envelope.
+  * Missing-token: with the secret set, a request without a token
+    refuses with 400.
+  * Missing-secret-soft: with the secret unset AND
+    `TURNSTILE_REQUIRED=false` (the v0.12.0 default), the request
+    admits — this is the dev / "operator hasn't wired it yet" path.
+  * Missing-secret-hard: with the secret unset AND
+    `TURNSTILE_REQUIRED=true`, the request refuses with 500
+    "auth misconfigured" — the production fail-closed path once
+    the operator has flipped the policy.
+
+The Turnstile siteverify call is mocked at the `httpx.post` boundary
+inside `app.turnstile` so no real keys are needed and no real
+CloudFlare call is made. The Gitea fakes from `test_propose_vertical`
+remain in scope so the rest of the app boots cleanly.
+"""
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+from types import SimpleNamespace
+
+import pytest
+
+from test_propose_vertical import (  # noqa: F401
+    FakeGitea,
+    app_with_fake_gitea,
+    tmp_env,
+)
+
+
+def _reset_outbound():
+    from app import email as email_mod
+    email_mod.reset_sent_envelopes()
+
+
+def _outbound_otc_envelopes(to_address: str | None = None) -> list[dict]:
+    from app import email as email_mod
+    out = []
+    for env in email_mod.sent_envelopes():
+        if env.get("kind") != "otc":
+            continue
+        if to_address is not None and env["to"] != to_address:
+            continue
+        out.append(env)
+    return out
+
+
+def _patch_siteverify(monkeypatch, *, success: bool, error_codes: list[str] | None = None):
+    """Replace `httpx.post` inside `app.turnstile` with a stub that
+    returns the requested success shape. The stub does not touch the
+    real CloudFlare endpoint and never sees a real secret.
+    """
+    captured = {}
+
+    def fake_post(url, *, data=None, timeout=None, **kwargs):
+        captured["url"] = url
+        captured["data"] = data
+        body = {"success": bool(success)}
+        if error_codes is not None:
+            body["error-codes"] = error_codes
+        return SimpleNamespace(json=lambda: body)
+
+    from app import turnstile as turnstile_mod
+    monkeypatch.setattr(turnstile_mod.httpx, "post", fake_post)
+    return captured
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Happy path: secret set, token valid → admit + OTC envelope lands
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+def test_otc_request_admits_when_turnstile_token_is_valid(app_with_fake_gitea, monkeypatch):
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+
+    monkeypatch.setenv("CLOUDFLARE_TURNSTILE_SECRET", "test-secret-not-real")
+    monkeypatch.setenv("TURNSTILE_REQUIRED", "true")
+    captured = _patch_siteverify(monkeypatch, success=True)
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        _reset_outbound()
+        r = client.post(
+            "/auth/otc/request",
+            json={"email": "alice@example.com", "turnstile_token": "fake-token-abc"},
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
+        # The siteverify call was made with the secret + the token we sent.
+        assert captured["data"]["secret"] == "test-secret-not-real"
+        assert captured["data"]["response"] == "fake-token-abc"
+        # And the OTC dispatch ran — exactly one envelope to the address.
+        envs = _outbound_otc_envelopes("alice@example.com")
+        assert len(envs) == 1
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Failure path: secret set, siteverify says success=false → 400 + no envelope
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+def test_otc_request_refuses_when_turnstile_siteverify_fails(app_with_fake_gitea, monkeypatch):
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+
+    monkeypatch.setenv("CLOUDFLARE_TURNSTILE_SECRET", "test-secret-not-real")
+    monkeypatch.setenv("TURNSTILE_REQUIRED", "true")
+    _patch_siteverify(monkeypatch, success=False, error_codes=["invalid-input-response"])
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        _reset_outbound()
+        r = client.post(
+            "/auth/otc/request",
+            json={"email": "alice@example.com", "turnstile_token": "fake-bad-token"},
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 400, r.text
+        # The OTC bcrypt + SMTP path did not run — no envelope was buffered.
+        assert _outbound_otc_envelopes("alice@example.com") == []
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Missing-token: secret set, no token → 400 + no envelope
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+def test_otc_request_refuses_when_turnstile_token_is_missing(app_with_fake_gitea, monkeypatch):
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+
+    monkeypatch.setenv("CLOUDFLARE_TURNSTILE_SECRET", "test-secret-not-real")
+    monkeypatch.setenv("TURNSTILE_REQUIRED", "true")
+    # Even though we patch httpx.post, the missing-token check fires
+    # before the siteverify call — so the patch is here only as a
+    # safety net in case the implementation regresses to making the
+    # network call anyway.
+    _patch_siteverify(monkeypatch, success=False)
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        _reset_outbound()
+        r = client.post(
+            "/auth/otc/request",
+            json={"email": "alice@example.com"},  # no turnstile_token field at all
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 400, r.text
+        assert _outbound_otc_envelopes("alice@example.com") == []
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Missing-secret-soft: no secret, TURNSTILE_REQUIRED=false (default) → admit
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+def test_otc_request_admits_when_secret_unset_and_not_required(app_with_fake_gitea, monkeypatch):
+    """v0.12.0 default: the operator has not yet wired the Turnstile
+    secret and has not enabled `TURNSTILE_REQUIRED`. The gate stays
+    open — this is the dev / test / pre-rollout path. Once the
+    operator confirms the secret is in place and flips
+    `TURNSTILE_REQUIRED=true`, missing-secret becomes fail-closed
+    (covered in test_otc_request_refuses_when_required_but_secret_unset).
+    """
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+
+    monkeypatch.delenv("CLOUDFLARE_TURNSTILE_SECRET", raising=False)
+    monkeypatch.delenv("TURNSTILE_REQUIRED", raising=False)
+    # The httpx.post inside turnstile must not be called in this path —
+    # patch it to a sentinel that explodes if it ever runs.
+    from app import turnstile as turnstile_mod
+
+    def must_not_be_called(*a, **kw):
+        raise AssertionError("siteverify should not run when no secret is configured")
+
+    monkeypatch.setattr(turnstile_mod.httpx, "post", must_not_be_called)
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        _reset_outbound()
+        r = client.post(
+            "/auth/otc/request",
+            json={"email": "alice@example.com"},
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 200, r.text
+        # The OTC path ran end-to-end — one envelope to the address.
+        assert len(_outbound_otc_envelopes("alice@example.com")) == 1
+
+
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Missing-secret-hard: no secret, TURNSTILE_REQUIRED=true → 500 "misconfigured"
+# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+def test_otc_request_refuses_when_required_but_secret_unset(app_with_fake_gitea, monkeypatch):
+    """Once the operator has flipped `TURNSTILE_REQUIRED=true` to lock
+    down production, a missing secret stops being a soft-fail and
+    becomes a fail-closed 500. This is the regression-detection shape
+    the §20.4 upgrade-steps MAY block calls out — flip the flag once
+    the secret is wired so a future config drift fails loudly instead
+    of silently disabling abuse defense.
+    """
+    from fastapi.testclient import TestClient
+
+    monkeypatch.delenv("CLOUDFLARE_TURNSTILE_SECRET", raising=False)
+    monkeypatch.setenv("TURNSTILE_REQUIRED", "true")
+
+    app, _fake = app_with_fake_gitea
+    with TestClient(app) as client:
+        _reset_outbound()
+        r = client.post(
+            "/auth/otc/request",
+            json={"email": "alice@example.com", "turnstile_token": "doesnt-matter"},
+        )
+        assert r.status_code == 500, r.text
+        assert _outbound_otc_envelopes("alice@example.com") == []

frontend/.env.example

@@ -49,3 +49,39 @@ VITE_PRIVACY_POLICY_URL=
 # Examples:
 #   VITE_COOKIES_POLICY_URL=https://wiggleverse.org/cookies
 VITE_COOKIES_POLICY_URL=
+
+# v0.12.0 / roadmap item #10: CloudFlare Turnstile site key (public).
+# Provision a Turnstile site at dash.cloudflare.com → Turnstile → Add
+# site. The site key (this var) is embedded into the frontend bundle at
+# build time and rendered by the Turnstile widget on the /login email-
+# entry step. The secret key (private) lives in the backend env as
+# CLOUDFLARE_TURNSTILE_SECRET — see backend/.env.example. Leave unset
+# in dev to skip the widget; the backend's TURNSTILE_REQUIRED policy
+# decides what happens to a tokenless request.
+#
+# Examples:
+#   VITE_TURNSTILE_SITE_KEY=0x4AAAAAAA...
+VITE_TURNSTILE_SITE_KEY=
+
+# v0.15.0 / roadmap item #13: Amplitude project API key (public).
+# Embedded in the frontend bundle at build time and used by the
+# analytics wrapper (`frontend/src/lib/analytics.js`) — which loads
+# `@amplitude/unified` (Analytics + Session Replay) when the user
+# has granted analytics consent (v0.13.0 cookie banner). Provision
+# an Amplitude project at app.amplitude.com → Projects → New, copy
+# the API key.
+#
+# Public by design: Amplitude browser keys are bundle-embedded
+# (visible in dev tools), same nature as VITE_TURNSTILE_SITE_KEY
+# (also public; the truly-secret half of that Turnstile pair is
+# CLOUDFLARE_TURNSTILE_SECRET on the backend). For deployments
+# behind flotilla, bind via `flotilla overlay set <deployment>
+# VITE_AMPLITUDE_API_KEY=<key>` — NOT `flotilla secret set`. The
+# vendor's installation wizard shows the key inline as a literal
+# string in the init call, confirming the public framing. Leave
+# unset in dev; the wrapper logs one console warning and no-ops
+# (the app continues to work).
+#
+# Examples:
+#   VITE_AMPLITUDE_API_KEY=01234567890abcdef01234567890abcd
+VITE_AMPLITUDE_API_KEY=

frontend/package-lock.json

@@ -1,13 +1,14 @@
 {
   "name": "rfc-app-frontend",
-  "version": "0.13.0",
+  "version": "0.15.0",
   "lockfileVersion": 3,
   "requires": true,
   "packages": {
     "": {
       "name": "rfc-app-frontend",
-      "version": "0.13.0",
+      "version": "0.15.0",
       "dependencies": {
+        "@amplitude/unified": "^1.1.9",
         "@codemirror/commands": "^6.10.3",
         "@codemirror/lang-markdown": "^6.5.0",
         "@codemirror/language": "^6.12.3",
@@ -30,6 +31,360 @@
         "vite": "^8.0.12"
       }
     },
+    "node_modules/@amplitude/analytics-browser": {
+      "version": "2.42.4",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@amplitude/analytics-browser/-/analytics-browser-2.42.4.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-q1XUlaKQkLq2CFx8xsVEc+uekOwHlnDYyaMBzlQDf2vcEaPaQDb7LzJ7z4CFs4Jn9FyBGDNo4w3IYjv9L6xjGA==",
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "@amplitude/analytics-core": "2.48.2",
+        "@amplitude/plugin-autocapture-browser": "1.27.2",
+        "@amplitude/plugin-custom-enrichment-browser": "0.1.9",
+        "@amplitude/plugin-event-property-attribution-browser": "0.2.1",
+        "@amplitude/plugin-network-capture-browser": "1.10.1",
+        "@amplitude/plugin-page-url-enrichment-browser": "0.7.11",
+        "@amplitude/plugin-page-view-tracking-browser": "2.11.1",
+        "@amplitude/plugin-web-vitals-browser": "1.1.33",
+        "tslib": "^2.4.1"
+      }
+    },
+    "node_modules/@amplitude/analytics-client-common": {
+      "version": "2.4.48",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@amplitude/analytics-client-common/-/analytics-client-common-2.4.48.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-jdRvu8ux3aIf74FvTDZuSFR1mutzdrIg1ebXYqpKizs9upXz1AJnHClkldSw9i4yu924AJ2wudxq6dccHWlNiA==",
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "@amplitude/analytics-connector": "^1.4.8",
+        "@amplitude/analytics-core": "2.48.2",
+        "@amplitude/analytics-types": "2.11.1",
+        "tslib": "^2.4.1"
+      }
+    },
+    "node_modules/@amplitude/analytics-connector": {
+      "version": "1.6.4",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@amplitude/analytics-connector/-/analytics-connector-1.6.4.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-SpIv0IQMNIq6SH3UqFGiaZyGSc7PBZwRdq7lvP0pBxW8i4Ny+8zwI0pV+VMfMHQwWY3wdIbWw5WQphNjpdq1/Q==",
+      "license": "MIT"
+    },
+    "node_modules/@amplitude/analytics-core": {
+      "version": "2.48.2",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@amplitude/analytics-core/-/analytics-core-2.48.2.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-r9O+hsTnTsDa1p6QdyC0KbBPXupzoWz9053RQB9XQz8078LM+5KCMbCKYOrSYniH4DH/OM2kOUEdJlwdxIl/IA==",
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "@amplitude/analytics-connector": "^1.6.4",
+        "@types/zen-observable": "0.8.3",
+        "safe-json-stringify": "1.2.0",
+        "tslib": "^2.4.1",
+        "zen-observable": "0.10.0"
+      }
+    },
+    "node_modules/@amplitude/analytics-types": {
+      "version": "2.11.1",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@amplitude/analytics-types/-/analytics-types-2.11.1.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-wFEgb0t99ly2uJKm5oZ28Lti0Kh5RecR5XBkwfUpDzn84IoCIZ8GJTsMw/nThu8FZFc7xFDA4UAt76zhZKrs9A==",
+      "license": "MIT"
+    },
+    "node_modules/@amplitude/engagement-browser": {
+      "version": "1.0.9",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@amplitude/engagement-browser/-/engagement-browser-1.0.9.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-zvPr0L5aLlOS3nG8scIkEEDMVK2y3MaMbgjYhMfYruhMpfsC/U0apov22nEc1RRrTwve2awEXruPRKf1TysqrQ==",
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "@amplitude/analytics-types": "^2.0.0"
+      }
+    },
+    "node_modules/@amplitude/experiment-core": {
+      "version": "0.13.1",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@amplitude/experiment-core/-/experiment-core-0.13.1.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-ZHvR0dxTltasp8MiMcQ6qKsY20mWnODoy3oebGad6qaRR1ywpUi8IuLf5AwLTM35ZwgzEUTn9TEIWKLHpDwHMw==",
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "js-base64": "^3.7.5"
+      }
+    },
+    "node_modules/@amplitude/experiment-js-client": {
+      "version": "1.21.1",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@amplitude/experiment-js-client/-/experiment-js-client-1.21.1.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-chE/4qQG/5Cgl93Wqj1NEdgOL5LkqySLlfk1EN0f+7bJa52HpkGFALA2FeCNYf31Z5CglEeKX6dUMgL7y33SIw==",
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "@amplitude/analytics-connector": "^1.6.4",
+        "@amplitude/experiment-core": "^0.13.1",
+        "@amplitude/ua-parser-js": "^0.7.31",
+        "base64-js": "1.5.1",
+        "unfetch": "4.1.0"
+      }
+    },
+    "node_modules/@amplitude/plugin-autocapture-browser": {
+      "version": "1.27.2",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@amplitude/plugin-autocapture-browser/-/plugin-autocapture-browser-1.27.2.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-UTA/0IDw/f2nnK+S1XILqoI5pgUgMTEZokDS6+pC4wuYtmOS9uNAgKuyajzjW12uobybMHRpv7xLjCJ5khKGAg==",
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "@amplitude/analytics-core": "2.48.2",
+        "tslib": "^2.4.1"
+      }
+    },
+    "node_modules/@amplitude/plugin-custom-enrichment-browser": {
+      "version": "0.1.9",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@amplitude/plugin-custom-enrichment-browser/-/plugin-custom-enrichment-browser-0.1.9.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-wemh2Tw3zgQ7sa7MUNyMGz9OR6VjTG4tlAMrLlDKbQ4tVkgNI3oAwOF7+0BA8qzgeMXX6iw+CEKaE+EC/okkuQ==",
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "@amplitude/analytics-core": "2.48.2",
+        "tslib": "^2.4.1"
+      }
+    },
+    "node_modules/@amplitude/plugin-event-property-attribution-browser": {
+      "version": "0.2.1",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@amplitude/plugin-event-property-attribution-browser/-/plugin-event-property-attribution-browser-0.2.1.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-xqBCZe0DYsKyQ1eELN2LM8adXwRE2eOi3SnvSu9SkS0GDXBYWinuPCuLqyc/3uD5hY2FLACWvakpU0tr7GDJgg==",
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "@amplitude/analytics-core": "2.48.2",
+        "tslib": "^2.4.1"
+      }
+    },
+    "node_modules/@amplitude/plugin-experiment-browser": {
+      "version": "1.0.0-beta.28",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@amplitude/plugin-experiment-browser/-/plugin-experiment-browser-1.0.0-beta.28.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-NQz267zLi7vl2G2lx10yUrEoGOCe5K9iqcPSIjbTavGu/XGvsmqLDqBHhg+EkdEMAPwypoXnmtPEs3RMhX+1MA==",
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "@amplitude/analytics-core": "2.48.2",
+        "@amplitude/experiment-js-client": "^1.15.5"
+      }
+    },
+    "node_modules/@amplitude/plugin-network-capture-browser": {
+      "version": "1.10.1",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@amplitude/plugin-network-capture-browser/-/plugin-network-capture-browser-1.10.1.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-jROIAkUDPd25A/t8W5MpmsTiBat2qoJbCMoNBKKxLMNEaE8VYbheflByWLkm4enbHgWS7OveWy0i3Oc7uPCfAg==",
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "@amplitude/analytics-core": "2.48.2",
+        "tslib": "^2.4.1"
+      }
+    },
+    "node_modules/@amplitude/plugin-page-url-enrichment-browser": {
+      "version": "0.7.11",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@amplitude/plugin-page-url-enrichment-browser/-/plugin-page-url-enrichment-browser-0.7.11.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-u9JhUP/VenJifCSbdTz2YZZiXAphs3efzd+qx1SRAIU6d1swPh0g/GVw3sTwvH+4MZtw3SwVC1OFxmz+f2QVyA==",
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "@amplitude/analytics-core": "2.48.2",
+        "tslib": "^2.4.1"
+      }
+    },
+    "node_modules/@amplitude/plugin-page-view-tracking-browser": {
+      "version": "2.11.1",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@amplitude/plugin-page-view-tracking-browser/-/plugin-page-view-tracking-browser-2.11.1.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-tfXg6Uir6X1XuWsOOXE/EgZ9NvM7i2ktDdagydSrFN6OyVkMvqdjPKUZSSUPuHtOoomboi3WaZsTUfq1jkWP3w==",
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "@amplitude/analytics-core": "2.48.2",
+        "tslib": "^2.4.1"
+      }
+    },
+    "node_modules/@amplitude/plugin-session-replay-browser": {
+      "version": "1.31.0",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@amplitude/plugin-session-replay-browser/-/plugin-session-replay-browser-1.31.0.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-b7kyYVEdW3EMR6cPXCfld+h8nQsuAR5o6vum8Glu+ofhFDfG4wj/mTJ0ITEaNbsJCfXniKQ3kFgTe6hTtxSFGQ==",
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "@amplitude/analytics-client-common": "2.4.48",
+        "@amplitude/analytics-core": "2.48.2",
+        "@amplitude/analytics-types": "2.11.1",
+        "@amplitude/rrweb-plugin-console-record": "2.0.0-alpha.40",
+        "@amplitude/rrweb-record": "2.0.0-alpha.40",
+        "@amplitude/session-replay-browser": "1.44.0",
+        "idb-keyval": "^6.2.1",
+        "tslib": "^2.4.1"
+      }
+    },
+    "node_modules/@amplitude/plugin-web-vitals-browser": {
+      "version": "1.1.33",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@amplitude/plugin-web-vitals-browser/-/plugin-web-vitals-browser-1.1.33.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-33FzxMH1Lr2lhvr5DDy3xD1HHWEI4KPLQsMUXqDTldkLl/ENNeBWcsljQTTDJipmRdS32I79KJhuHRNaoXd6fg==",
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "@amplitude/analytics-core": "2.48.2",
+        "tslib": "^2.4.1",
+        "web-vitals": "5.1.0"
+      }
+    },
+    "node_modules/@amplitude/rrdom": {
+      "version": "2.1.0",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@amplitude/rrdom/-/rrdom-2.1.0.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-2dAtxXL02usBV2CSOnScLd3WoVqWaeiGpxN8LuXJ0r/NpLJkW1k876v2tRKAz5NrxPwSdjihsMmwCIXHpJhHfA==",
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "@amplitude/rrweb-snapshot": "^2.1.0"
+      }
+    },
+    "node_modules/@amplitude/rrweb": {
+      "version": "2.1.1",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@amplitude/rrweb/-/rrweb-2.1.1.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-6uA+5VE/VHumaXPXTTLGRogd/K9MDwd01jGteppeLzsX0PvqlDyY5aIi35yh9+q1iS6ciPBn/2NRg0lg4cFIlw==",
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "@amplitude/rrdom": "^2.1.0",
+        "@amplitude/rrweb-snapshot": "^2.1.0",
+        "@amplitude/rrweb-types": "^2.1.0",
+        "@amplitude/rrweb-utils": "^2.1.0",
+        "@types/css-font-loading-module": "0.0.7",
+        "@xstate/fsm": "^1.4.0",
+        "base64-arraybuffer": "^1.0.1",
+        "mitt": "^3.0.0"
+      }
+    },
+    "node_modules/@amplitude/rrweb-packer": {
+      "version": "2.0.0-alpha.40",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@amplitude/rrweb-packer/-/rrweb-packer-2.0.0-alpha.40.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-Btb6b9pS1IvDMbvyYxpUdTk9NRJugSoJjRCl7R6jP/iSlPWXoveJIwHaNFAS9ZmWUEK7HhyBJ8bKGFN3giUsDg==",
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "@amplitude/rrweb-types": "^2.0.0-alpha.40",
+        "fflate": "^0.4.4"
+      }
+    },
+    "node_modules/@amplitude/rrweb-plugin-console-record": {
+      "version": "2.0.0-alpha.40",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@amplitude/rrweb-plugin-console-record/-/rrweb-plugin-console-record-2.0.0-alpha.40.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-vtY7T/kGFl62nC1u7ZUXQvU7ulB70cZGVHPRN/SO9fzVfsY7y6rCmBfoc2jS5KmISdlgkVzMjY2r/EE2Gk9AQA==",
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "peerDependencies": {
+        "@amplitude/rrweb": "^2.0.0-alpha.40"
+      }
+    },
+    "node_modules/@amplitude/rrweb-record": {
+      "version": "2.0.0-alpha.40",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@amplitude/rrweb-record/-/rrweb-record-2.0.0-alpha.40.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-5cJhQwzhymJWX5/XOtpWK0h2NLq9+t2YiO6ub0cdZ9F5AZizaRbsVH88int07DfX0YiXTKWbISezVuduCLqgSQ==",
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "@amplitude/rrweb": "^2.0.0-alpha.40",
+        "@amplitude/rrweb-types": "^2.0.0-alpha.40"
+      }
+    },
+    "node_modules/@amplitude/rrweb-snapshot": {
+      "version": "2.1.0",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@amplitude/rrweb-snapshot/-/rrweb-snapshot-2.1.0.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-xYQvOW73ig+5M7caqilA8j0S6MHWUULLeJNK+2VVvUqv8mr4FMT2DUAQiVBGCImNlb9Gu2rLUfCScMnVxn+EDg==",
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "postcss": "^8.4.38"
+      }
+    },
+    "node_modules/@amplitude/rrweb-types": {
+      "version": "2.1.0",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@amplitude/rrweb-types/-/rrweb-types-2.1.0.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-S73tBI/04A6HCHgnrUNeeVOvnDTEoQnNrmZGyrZncJwRlTIX+6BQSYtBFofMag8GnAy9gA+NtC0TL0CnluOWBw==",
+      "license": "MIT"
+    },
+    "node_modules/@amplitude/rrweb-utils": {
+      "version": "2.1.0",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@amplitude/rrweb-utils/-/rrweb-utils-2.1.0.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-dTCDnSiMMHZ10utYHJ8dSd/xkjFgdF67y74PkOzAPcCKW1rLxyJYcFOA3uPL2b7cIVVmoel/5NTp5eflaUaJfQ==",
+      "license": "MIT"
+    },
+    "node_modules/@amplitude/session-replay-browser": {
+      "version": "1.44.0",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@amplitude/session-replay-browser/-/session-replay-browser-1.44.0.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-8Ruep2TTDMcfVMKurSpBbVclBK/v8Lb3aSHFsYd/xOQ1E3CaKoAu39pplli28NWoUcW7unyVE7khkOa2zzn0Lw==",
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "@amplitude/analytics-client-common": "2.4.48",
+        "@amplitude/analytics-core": "2.48.2",
+        "@amplitude/analytics-types": "2.11.1",
+        "@amplitude/experiment-core": "0.7.2",
+        "@amplitude/rrweb-packer": "2.0.0-alpha.40",
+        "@amplitude/rrweb-plugin-console-record": "2.0.0-alpha.40",
+        "@amplitude/rrweb-record": "2.0.0-alpha.40",
+        "@amplitude/rrweb-types": "2.0.0-alpha.40",
+        "@amplitude/rrweb-utils": "2.0.0-alpha.40",
+        "@amplitude/targeting": "0.2.0",
+        "@rollup/plugin-replace": "^6.0.1",
+        "idb": "8.0.0",
+        "tslib": "^2.4.1"
+      }
+    },
+    "node_modules/@amplitude/session-replay-browser/node_modules/@amplitude/experiment-core": {
+      "version": "0.7.2",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@amplitude/experiment-core/-/experiment-core-0.7.2.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-Wc2NWvgQ+bLJLeF0A9wBSPIaw0XuqqgkPKsoNFQrmS7r5Djd56um75In05tqmVntPJZRvGKU46pAp8o5tdf4mA==",
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "js-base64": "^3.7.5"
+      }
+    },
+    "node_modules/@amplitude/session-replay-browser/node_modules/@amplitude/rrweb-types": {
+      "version": "2.0.0-alpha.40",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@amplitude/rrweb-types/-/rrweb-types-2.0.0-alpha.40.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-rP7CBDkzXupxOA7ukvC+zDYLuCtsz54TuJKC4+5O72Jsz4YdokLznKZRG34P6zXozfhGU0261qckk87lLY6mKQ==",
+      "license": "MIT"
+    },
+    "node_modules/@amplitude/session-replay-browser/node_modules/@amplitude/rrweb-utils": {
+      "version": "2.0.0-alpha.40",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@amplitude/rrweb-utils/-/rrweb-utils-2.0.0-alpha.40.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-i1CCt6MCjlqoeNc+1Hse5bz+ZbASaWaIJ0WdJZvnQjUCHH29Xy/QFouyOuor73RZ+UWX4s2tYSrUIdmBepXk3w==",
+      "license": "MIT"
+    },
+    "node_modules/@amplitude/targeting": {
+      "version": "0.2.0",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@amplitude/targeting/-/targeting-0.2.0.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-/50ywTrC4hfcfJVBbh5DFbqMPPfaIOivZeb5Gb+OGM03QrA+lsUqdvtnKLNuWtceD4H6QQ2KFzPJ5aAJLyzVDA==",
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "@amplitude/analytics-client-common": ">=1 <3",
+        "@amplitude/analytics-core": ">=1 <3",
+        "@amplitude/analytics-types": ">=1 <3",
+        "@amplitude/experiment-core": "0.7.2",
+        "idb": "^8.0.0",
+        "tslib": "^2.4.1"
+      }
+    },
+    "node_modules/@amplitude/targeting/node_modules/@amplitude/experiment-core": {
+      "version": "0.7.2",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@amplitude/experiment-core/-/experiment-core-0.7.2.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-Wc2NWvgQ+bLJLeF0A9wBSPIaw0XuqqgkPKsoNFQrmS7r5Djd56um75In05tqmVntPJZRvGKU46pAp8o5tdf4mA==",
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "js-base64": "^3.7.5"
+      }
+    },
+    "node_modules/@amplitude/ua-parser-js": {
+      "version": "0.7.33",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@amplitude/ua-parser-js/-/ua-parser-js-0.7.33.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-wKEtVR4vXuPT9cVEIJkYWnlF++Gx3BdLatPBM+SZ1ztVIvnhdGBZR/mn9x/PzyrMcRlZmyi6L56I2J3doVBnjA==",
+      "funding": [
+        {
+          "type": "opencollective",
+          "url": "https://opencollective.com/ua-parser-js"
+        },
+        {
+          "type": "paypal",
+          "url": "https://paypal.me/faisalman"
+        }
+      ],
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "engines": {
+        "node": "*"
+      }
+    },
+    "node_modules/@amplitude/unified": {
+      "version": "1.1.9",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@amplitude/unified/-/unified-1.1.9.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-YPgQbp/vDQ92GshHs2hfUxoeRnR3rRBWCoQ6wXgFjXQ1uiJf2tP0CBZWdrCStSDuhcpo2rsCz/Ek2LGq5J6SIQ==",
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "@amplitude/analytics-browser": "2.42.4",
+        "@amplitude/analytics-core": "2.48.2",
+        "@amplitude/engagement-browser": "^1.0.3",
+        "@amplitude/plugin-experiment-browser": "1.0.0-beta.28",
+        "@amplitude/plugin-session-replay-browser": "1.31.0"
+      }
+    },
     "node_modules/@antfu/install-pkg": {
       "version": "1.1.0",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@antfu/install-pkg/-/install-pkg-1.1.0.tgz",
@@ -264,6 +619,12 @@
         "import-meta-resolve": "^4.2.0"
       }
     },
+    "node_modules/@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec": {
+      "version": "1.5.5",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec/-/sourcemap-codec-1.5.5.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-cYQ9310grqxueWbl+WuIUIaiUaDcj7WOq5fVhEljNVgRfOUhY9fy2zTvfoqWsnebh8Sl70VScFbICvJnLKB0Og==",
+      "license": "MIT"
+    },
     "node_modules/@lezer/common": {
       "version": "1.5.2",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@lezer/common/-/common-1.5.2.tgz",
@@ -657,6 +1018,49 @@
       "dev": true,
       "license": "MIT"
     },
+    "node_modules/@rollup/plugin-replace": {
+      "version": "6.0.3",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@rollup/plugin-replace/-/plugin-replace-6.0.3.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-J4RZarRvQAm5IF0/LwUUg+obsm+xZhYnbMXmXROyoSE1ATJe3oXSb9L5MMppdxP2ylNSjv6zFBwKYjcKMucVfA==",
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "@rollup/pluginutils": "^5.0.1",
+        "magic-string": "^0.30.3"
+      },
+      "engines": {
+        "node": ">=14.0.0"
+      },
+      "peerDependencies": {
+        "rollup": "^1.20.0||^2.0.0||^3.0.0||^4.0.0"
+      },
+      "peerDependenciesMeta": {
+        "rollup": {
+          "optional": true
+        }
+      }
+    },
+    "node_modules/@rollup/pluginutils": {
+      "version": "5.3.0",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@rollup/pluginutils/-/pluginutils-5.3.0.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-5EdhGZtnu3V88ces7s53hhfK5KSASnJZv8Lulpc04cWO3REESroJXg73DFsOmgbU2BhwV0E20bu2IDZb3VKW4Q==",
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "@types/estree": "^1.0.0",
+        "estree-walker": "^2.0.2",
+        "picomatch": "^4.0.2"
+      },
+      "engines": {
+        "node": ">=14.0.0"
+      },
+      "peerDependencies": {
+        "rollup": "^1.20.0||^2.0.0||^3.0.0||^4.0.0"
+      },
+      "peerDependenciesMeta": {
+        "rollup": {
+          "optional": true
+        }
+      }
+    },
     "node_modules/@tiptap/core": {
       "version": "3.23.6",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@tiptap/core/-/core-3.23.6.tgz",
@@ -1109,6 +1513,12 @@
         "tslib": "^2.4.0"
       }
     },
+    "node_modules/@types/css-font-loading-module": {
+      "version": "0.0.7",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@types/css-font-loading-module/-/css-font-loading-module-0.0.7.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-nl09VhutdjINdWyXxHWN/w9zlNCfr60JUqJbd24YXUuCwgeL0TpFSdElCwb6cxfB6ybE19Gjj4g0jsgkXxKv1Q==",
+      "license": "MIT"
+    },
     "node_modules/@types/d3": {
       "version": "7.4.3",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@types/d3/-/d3-7.4.3.tgz",
@@ -1362,6 +1772,12 @@
         "@types/d3-selection": "*"
       }
     },
+    "node_modules/@types/estree": {
+      "version": "1.0.9",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@types/estree/-/estree-1.0.9.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-GhdPgy1el4/ImP05X05Uw4cw2/M93BCUmnEvWZNStlCzEKME4Fkk+YpoA5OiHNQmoS7Cafb8Xa3Pya8m1Qrzeg==",
+      "license": "MIT"
+    },
     "node_modules/@types/geojson": {
       "version": "7946.0.16",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@types/geojson/-/geojson-7946.0.16.tgz",
@@ -1399,6 +1815,12 @@
       "integrity": "sha512-zFDAD+tlpf2r4asuHEj0XH6pY6i0g5NeAHPn+15wk3BV6JA69eERFXC1gyGThDkVa1zCyKr5jox1+2LbV/AMLg==",
       "license": "MIT"
     },
+    "node_modules/@types/zen-observable": {
+      "version": "0.8.3",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@types/zen-observable/-/zen-observable-0.8.3.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-fbF6oTd4sGGy0xjHPKAt+eS2CrxJ3+6gQ3FGcBoIJR2TLAyCkCyI8JqZNy+FeON0AhVgNJoUumVoZQjBFUqHkw==",
+      "license": "MIT"
+    },
     "node_modules/@upsetjs/venn.js": {
       "version": "2.0.0",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@upsetjs/venn.js/-/venn.js-2.0.0.tgz",
@@ -1435,6 +1857,41 @@
         }
       }
     },
+    "node_modules/@xstate/fsm": {
+      "version": "1.6.5",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@xstate/fsm/-/fsm-1.6.5.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-b5o1I6aLNeYlU/3CPlj/Z91ybk1gUsKT+5NAJI+2W4UjvS5KLG28K9v5UvNoFVjHV8PajVZ00RH3vnjyQO7ZAw==",
+      "license": "MIT"
+    },
+    "node_modules/base64-arraybuffer": {
+      "version": "1.0.2",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/base64-arraybuffer/-/base64-arraybuffer-1.0.2.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-I3yl4r9QB5ZRY3XuJVEPfc2XhZO6YweFPI+UovAzn+8/hb3oJ6lnysaFcjVpkCPfVWFUDvoZ8kmVDP7WyRtYtQ==",
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "engines": {
+        "node": ">= 0.6.0"
+      }
+    },
+    "node_modules/base64-js": {
+      "version": "1.5.1",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/base64-js/-/base64-js-1.5.1.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-AKpaYlHn8t4SVbOHCy+b5+KKgvR4vrsD8vbvrbiQJps7fKDTkjkDry6ji0rUJjC0kzbNePLwzxq8iypo41qeWA==",
+      "funding": [
+        {
+          "type": "github",
+          "url": "https://github.com/sponsors/feross"
+        },
+        {
+          "type": "patreon",
+          "url": "https://www.patreon.com/feross"
+        },
+        {
+          "type": "consulting",
+          "url": "https://feross.org/support"
+        }
+      ],
+      "license": "MIT"
+    },
     "node_modules/commander": {
       "version": "7.2.0",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/commander/-/commander-7.2.0.tgz",
@@ -2021,6 +2478,12 @@
         "benchmarks"
       ]
     },
+    "node_modules/estree-walker": {
+      "version": "2.0.2",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/estree-walker/-/estree-walker-2.0.2.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-Rfkk/Mp/DL7JVje3u18FxFujQlTNR2q6QfMSMB7AvCBx91NGj/ba3kCfza0f6dVDbw7YlRf/nDrn7pQrCCyQ/w==",
+      "license": "MIT"
+    },
     "node_modules/fast-equals": {
       "version": "5.4.0",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/fast-equals/-/fast-equals-5.4.0.tgz",
@@ -2048,6 +2511,12 @@
         }
       }
     },
+    "node_modules/fflate": {
+      "version": "0.4.8",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/fflate/-/fflate-0.4.8.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-FJqqoDBR00Mdj9ppamLa/Y7vxm+PRmNWA67N846RvsoYVMKB4q3y/de5PA7gUmRMYK/8CMz2GDZQmCRN1wBcWA==",
+      "license": "MIT"
+    },
     "node_modules/fsevents": {
       "version": "2.3.3",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/fsevents/-/fsevents-2.3.3.tgz",
@@ -2081,6 +2550,18 @@
         "node": ">=0.10.0"
       }
     },
+    "node_modules/idb": {
+      "version": "8.0.0",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/idb/-/idb-8.0.0.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-l//qvlAKGmQO31Qn7xdzagVPPaHTxXx199MhrAFuVBTPqydcPYBWjkrbv4Y0ktB+GmWOiwHl237UUOrLmQxLvw==",
+      "license": "ISC"
+    },
+    "node_modules/idb-keyval": {
+      "version": "6.2.4",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/idb-keyval/-/idb-keyval-6.2.4.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-D/NzHWUmYJGXi++z67aMSrnisb9A3621CyRK5G89JyTlN13C8xf0g04DLxUKMufPem3e3L2JAXR6Z00OWy183Q==",
+      "license": "Apache-2.0"
+    },
     "node_modules/import-meta-resolve": {
       "version": "4.2.0",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/import-meta-resolve/-/import-meta-resolve-4.2.0.tgz",
@@ -2100,6 +2581,12 @@
         "node": ">=12"
       }
     },
+    "node_modules/js-base64": {
+      "version": "3.7.8",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/js-base64/-/js-base64-3.7.8.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-hNngCeKxIUQiEUN3GPJOkz4wF/YvdUdbNL9hsBcMQTkKzboD7T/q3OYOuuPZLUE6dBxSGpwhk5mwuDud7JVAow==",
+      "license": "BSD-3-Clause"
+    },
     "node_modules/katex": {
       "version": "0.16.47",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/katex/-/katex-0.16.47.tgz",
@@ -2421,6 +2908,15 @@
       "integrity": "sha512-J8xewKD/Gk22OZbhpOVSwcs60zhd95ESDwezOFuA3/099925PdHJ7OFHNTGtajL3AlZkykD32HykiMo+BIBI8A==",
       "license": "MIT"
     },
+    "node_modules/magic-string": {
+      "version": "0.30.21",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/magic-string/-/magic-string-0.30.21.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-vd2F4YUyEXKGcLHoq+TEyCjxueSeHnFxyyjNp80yg0XV4vUhnDer/lvvlqM/arB5bXQN5K2/3oinyCRyx8T2CQ==",
+      "license": "MIT",
+      "dependencies": {
+        "@jridgewell/sourcemap-codec": "^1.5.5"
+      }
+    },
     "node_modules/marked": {
       "version": "18.0.4",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/marked/-/marked-18.0.4.tgz",
@@ -2474,11 +2970,16 @@
         "node": ">= 20"
       }
     },
+    "node_modules/mitt": {
+      "version": "3.0.1",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/mitt/-/mitt-3.0.1.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-vKivATfr97l2/QBCYAkXYDbrIWPM2IIKEl7YPhjCvKlG3kE2gm+uBo6nEXK3M5/Ffh/FLpKExzOQ3JJoJGFKBw==",
+      "license": "MIT"
+    },
     "node_modules/nanoid": {
       "version": "3.3.12",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/nanoid/-/nanoid-3.3.12.tgz",
       "integrity": "sha512-ZB9RH/39qpq5Vu6Y+NmUaFhQR6pp+M2Xt76XBnEwDaGcVAqhlvxrl3B2bKS5D3NH3QR76v3aSrKaF/Kiy7lEtQ==",
-      "dev": true,
       "funding": [
         {
           "type": "github",
@@ -2515,14 +3016,12 @@
       "version": "1.1.1",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/picocolors/-/picocolors-1.1.1.tgz",
       "integrity": "sha512-xceH2snhtb5M9liqDsmEw56le376mTZkEX/jEb/RxNFyegNul7eNslCXP9FDj/Lcu0X8KEyMceP2ntpaHrDEVA==",
-      "dev": true,
       "license": "ISC"
     },
     "node_modules/picomatch": {
       "version": "4.0.4",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/picomatch/-/picomatch-4.0.4.tgz",
       "integrity": "sha512-QP88BAKvMam/3NxH6vj2o21R6MjxZUAd6nlwAS/pnGvN9IVLocLHxGYIzFhg6fUQ+5th6P4dv4eW9jX3DSIj7A==",
-      "dev": true,
       "license": "MIT",
       "engines": {
         "node": ">=12"
@@ -2551,7 +3050,6 @@
       "version": "8.5.15",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/postcss/-/postcss-8.5.15.tgz",
       "integrity": "sha512-FfR8sjd4em2T6fb3I2MwAJU7HWVMr9zba+enmQeeWFfCbm+UOC/0X4DS8XtpUTMwWMGbjKYP7xjfNekzyGmB3A==",
-      "dev": true,
       "funding": [
         {
           "type": "opencollective",
@@ -2828,6 +3326,12 @@
       "integrity": "sha512-PdhdWy89SiZogBLaw42zdeqtRJ//zFd2PgQavcICDUgJT5oW10QCRKbJ6bg4r0/UY2M6BWd5tkxuGFRvCkgfHQ==",
       "license": "BSD-3-Clause"
     },
+    "node_modules/safe-json-stringify": {
+      "version": "1.2.0",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/safe-json-stringify/-/safe-json-stringify-1.2.0.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-gH8eh2nZudPQO6TytOvbxnuhYBOvDBBLW52tz5q6X58lJcd/tkmqFR+5Z9adS8aJtURSXWThWy/xJtJwixErvg==",
+      "license": "MIT"
+    },
     "node_modules/safer-buffer": {
       "version": "2.1.2",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/safer-buffer/-/safer-buffer-2.1.2.tgz",
@@ -2850,7 +3354,6 @@
       "version": "1.2.1",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/source-map-js/-/source-map-js-1.2.1.tgz",
       "integrity": "sha512-UXWMKhLOwVKb728IUtQPXxfYU+usdybtUrK/8uGE8CQMvrhOpwvzDBwj0QhSL7MQc7vIsISBG8VQ8+IDQxpfQA==",
-      "dev": true,
       "license": "BSD-3-Clause",
       "engines": {
         "node": ">=0.10.0"
@@ -2907,9 +3410,13 @@
       "version": "2.8.1",
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/tslib/-/tslib-2.8.1.tgz",
       "integrity": "sha512-oJFu94HQb+KVduSUQL7wnpmqnfmLsOA/nAh6b6EH0wCEoK0/mPeXU6c3wKDV83MkOuHPRHtSXKKU99IBazS/2w==",
-      "dev": true,
-      "license": "0BSD",
-      "optional": true
+      "license": "0BSD"
+    },
+    "node_modules/unfetch": {
+      "version": "4.1.0",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/unfetch/-/unfetch-4.1.0.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-crP/n3eAPUJxZXM9T80/yv0YhkTEx2K1D3h7D1AJM6fzsWZrxdyRuLN0JH/dkZh1LNH8LxCnBzoPFCPbb2iGpg==",
+      "license": "MIT"
     },
     "node_modules/use-sync-external-store": {
       "version": "1.6.0",
@@ -3016,6 +3523,18 @@
       "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/w3c-keyname/-/w3c-keyname-2.2.8.tgz",
       "integrity": "sha512-dpojBhNsCNN7T82Tm7k26A6G9ML3NkhDsnw9n/eoxSRlVBB4CEtIQ/KTCLI2Fwf3ataSXRhYFkQi3SlnFwPvPQ==",
       "license": "MIT"
+    },
+    "node_modules/web-vitals": {
+      "version": "5.1.0",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/web-vitals/-/web-vitals-5.1.0.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-ArI3kx5jI0atlTtmV0fWU3fjpLmq/nD3Zr1iFFlJLaqa5wLBkUSzINwBPySCX/8jRyjlmy1Volw1kz1g9XE4Jg==",
+      "license": "Apache-2.0"
+    },
+    "node_modules/zen-observable": {
+      "version": "0.10.0",
+      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/zen-observable/-/zen-observable-0.10.0.tgz",
+      "integrity": "sha512-iI3lT0iojZhKwT5DaFy2Ce42n3yFcLdFyOh01G7H0flMY60P8MJuVFEoJoNwXlmAyQ45GrjL6AcZmmlv8A5rbw==",
+      "license": "MIT"
     }
   }
 }

frontend/package.json

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 {
   "name": "rfc-app-frontend",
   "private": true,
-  "version": "0.13.0",
+  "version": "0.17.0",
   "type": "module",
   "scripts": {
     "dev": "vite",
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
     "preview": "vite preview"
   },
   "dependencies": {
+    "@amplitude/unified": "^1.1.9",
     "@codemirror/commands": "^6.10.3",
     "@codemirror/lang-markdown": "^6.5.0",
     "@codemirror/language": "^6.12.3",

frontend/src/App.css

@@ -410,6 +410,26 @@
   cursor: pointer; padding: 0;
 }
 .otc-login .btn-link-quiet:hover { color: #1a1a1a; text-decoration: underline; }
+/* v0.8.0 — labels + textarea for the first-OTC profile capture step. */
+.otc-field-label {
+  font-size: 12px; color: #666;
+  margin: 8px 0 -4px;
+  font-weight: 600;
+}
+.otc-login textarea {
+  width: 100%;
+  padding: 10px 12px;
+  font-size: 15px;
+  border: 1px solid #ddd;
+  border-radius: 6px;
+  box-sizing: border-box;
+  font-family: inherit;
+  resize: vertical;
+}
+.otc-login textarea:focus {
+  outline: none;
+  border-color: #1a1a1a;
+}
 .otc-shortcut-hint {
   color: #888; font-size: 12px; margin: 4px 0 0;
 }
@@ -435,6 +455,65 @@
 .otc-fallback a:hover { color: #1a1a1a; text-decoration: underline; }
 .otc-fallback-sep { color: #ccc; }
 
+/* v0.11.0 — "trust this device for 30 days" checkbox on the verify
+   step. Sits above the action row, padded so it doesn't crowd the
+   passcode/code input. */
+.otc-trust-device {
+  display: flex; align-items: center; gap: 8px;
+  font-size: 13px; color: #444;
+  margin: 8px 0 4px;
+  cursor: pointer;
+  user-select: none;
+}
+.otc-trust-device input[type="checkbox"] {
+  width: auto; margin: 0; cursor: pointer;
+}
+
+/* v0.11.0 — /settings/devices revoke-device UI. */
+.device-list {
+  list-style: none; padding: 0; margin: 12px 0 0;
+}
+.device-list-item {
+  display: flex; align-items: center; justify-content: space-between;
+  gap: 12px;
+  border: 1px solid #eee; border-radius: 6px;
+  padding: 10px 12px; margin: 0 0 8px;
+  background: #fafafa;
+}
+.device-list-item .device-meta {
+  flex: 1; min-width: 0;
+}
+.device-list-item .device-ua {
+  font-size: 13px; color: #1a1a1a;
+  white-space: nowrap; overflow: hidden; text-overflow: ellipsis;
+}
+.device-list-item .device-stamps {
+  font-size: 12px; color: #777;
+  margin-top: 2px;
+}
+.device-list-item button {
+  font-size: 12px; padding: 4px 10px;
+  border: 1px solid #ccc; border-radius: 4px;
+  background: white; cursor: pointer;
+}
+.device-list-item button:hover:not(:disabled) {
+  background: #f5f5f5;
+}
+.device-revoke-all {
+  margin-top: 8px;
+  font-size: 13px; padding: 6px 12px;
+  border: 1px solid #cb6a6a; border-radius: 4px;
+  background: white; color: #cb6a6a; cursor: pointer;
+}
+.device-revoke-all:hover:not(:disabled) {
+  background: #fff5f5;
+}
+.device-empty {
+  font-size: 13px; color: #777;
+  background: #fafafa; border: 1px solid #eee; border-radius: 6px;
+  padding: 12px;
+}
+
 /* --- Beta-pending page (post-OAuth-rejection) --- */
 
 .beta-pending {
@@ -466,6 +545,22 @@
 .btn-link-quiet { color: #666; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13px; }
 .btn-link-quiet:hover { color: #1a1a1a; text-decoration: underline; }
 
+/* v0.8.0 — thin "your beta access is in review" banner. Shown on every
+   page (other than /beta-pending itself, which carries the larger
+   form of the message). Sits just under the app header so it doesn't
+   compete with the catalog rail. */
+.pending-access-banner {
+  background: #fff8e0;
+  border-bottom: 1px solid #e6dca0;
+  color: #4a3f00;
+  font-size: 13px;
+  padding: 8px 16px;
+  text-align: center;
+}
+.pending-access-banner a {
+  color: #4a3f00; text-decoration: underline;
+}
+
 /* ── §8 RFC view: three-column shape ─────────────────────────────────── */
 
 .main-pane {
@@ -1853,6 +1948,54 @@
   display: inline-flex; align-items: center; gap: 6px;
   font-size: 13px; cursor: pointer;
 }
+
+/* v0.9.0 — admin user-management surface (roadmap item #7). */
+.admin-filter-chips {
+  display: flex; gap: 6px; margin-bottom: 16px; flex-wrap: wrap;
+}
+.admin-chip {
+  display: inline-flex; align-items: center; gap: 6px;
+  background: #fff; border: 1px solid #d1d5db; border-radius: 999px;
+  padding: 4px 12px; font-size: 12px; color: #374151; cursor: pointer;
+}
+.admin-chip:hover { background: #f9fafb; }
+.admin-chip.active {
+  background: #111; color: #fff; border-color: #111;
+}
+.admin-chip-count {
+  font-size: 11px; opacity: 0.7;
+}
+.admin-users-table td { vertical-align: top; padding-top: 10px; padding-bottom: 10px; }
+.permission-cell { display: flex; flex-direction: column; gap: 4px; }
+.permission-actions { display: flex; gap: 6px; }
+.permission-badge {
+  display: inline-block;
+  font-size: 11px; font-weight: 600;
+  padding: 2px 8px; border-radius: 999px;
+  text-transform: uppercase; letter-spacing: 0.04em;
+  width: max-content;
+}
+.permission-badge-pending {
+  background: #fef3c7; color: #92400e;
+}
+.permission-badge-granted {
+  background: #dcfce7; color: #166534;
+}
+.permission-badge-revoked {
+  background: #fee2e2; color: #991b1b;
+}
+.permission-decided { font-size: 11px; }
+.user-row-reason td {
+  background: #fffbeb; border-top: none !important;
+  padding: 0 16px 12px !important;
+}
+.user-reason-block {
+  border-left: 3px solid #f59e0b;
+  padding: 8px 12px; font-size: 13px;
+  background: #fffbeb;
+}
+.user-reason-block strong { display: block; margin-bottom: 4px; color: #92400e; }
+.user-reason-block p { margin: 0; white-space: pre-wrap; color: #374151; }
 .grad-queue { list-style: none; padding: 0; margin: 8px 0 24px; }
 .grad-queue li { padding: 8px 0; border-bottom: 1px solid #f3f4f6; }
 .grad-queue-link { color: #111; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14px; }

frontend/src/App.jsx

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
-import { useEffect, useState } from 'react'
-import { Routes, Route, Link, useNavigate } from 'react-router-dom'
+import { useEffect, useRef, useState } from 'react'
+import { Routes, Route, Link, useLocation, useNavigate } from 'react-router-dom'
 import { getMe, subscribeToNotifications } from './api'
+import { anonymize, EVENTS, identify, track } from './lib/analytics'
 import Catalog from './components/Catalog.jsx'
 import Inbox from './components/Inbox.jsx'
 import RFCView from './components/RFCView.jsx'
@@ -11,8 +12,11 @@ import Landing from './components/Landing.jsx'
 import Login from './components/Login.jsx'
 import BetaPending from './components/BetaPending.jsx'
 import Philosophy from './components/Philosophy.jsx'
+import Docs from './components/Docs.jsx'
 import NotificationSettings from './components/NotificationSettings.jsx'
 import Admin from './components/Admin.jsx'
+import AcceptInvitation from './components/AcceptInvitation.jsx'
+import InviteClaim from './components/InviteClaim.jsx'
 import ToastHost, { showToast } from './components/ToastHost.jsx'
 import CookieConsentBanner from './components/CookieConsentBanner.jsx'
 import Privacy from './pages/Privacy.jsx'
@@ -33,6 +37,56 @@ export default function App() {
   // event that bumps this.
   const [consentReopenTick, setConsentReopenTick] = useState(0)
   const navigate = useNavigate()
+  const location = useLocation()
+  // v0.15.0 — Page Viewed event taxonomy. We fire on every
+  // route change; the analytics wrapper itself decides whether
+  // anything ships out (consent + key check). The first fire is
+  // also covered because `location` is set on mount.
+  const lastPathRef = useRef(null)
+  useEffect(() => {
+    const path = location.pathname + (location.search || '')
+    if (lastPathRef.current === path) return
+    lastPathRef.current = path
+    track(EVENTS.PAGE_VIEWED, { path: location.pathname })
+  }, [location.pathname, location.search])
+
+  // v0.15.0 + #21 Part C — bind the authenticated user id AND
+  // durable user properties to the analytics session when sign-in
+  // lands; reset on sign-out (viewer flips to null). The wrapper
+  // queues these calls until consent + init resolve, so the order
+  // is safe even on a cold load.
+  //
+  // Property bag passed to identify (set vs setOnce per #21 Part C):
+  //   set:     role, permission_state, passcode_set, device_trusted
+  //            (these can change mid-account-life — refresh each sign-in)
+  //   setOnce: first_sign_in_at, account_created_at
+  //            (immutable user-history markers — set on the first
+  //            sign-in that observes them, never overwritten)
+  //
+  // PII discipline: NO email, NO display_name, NO gitea_login passed
+  // through — Amplitude only sees opaque ids + enums + timestamps +
+  // booleans.
+  const lastUserIdRef = useRef(null)
+  useEffect(() => {
+    const uid = me?.authenticated ? me.user?.id : null
+    const viewer = me?.authenticated ? me.user : null
+    if (uid != null && lastUserIdRef.current !== uid) {
+      lastUserIdRef.current = uid
+      const props = {}
+      if (viewer?.role != null) props.role = viewer.role
+      if (viewer?.permission_state != null) props.permission_state = viewer.permission_state
+      if (viewer?.passcode_set != null) props.passcode_set = !!viewer.passcode_set
+      if (viewer?.device_trusted != null) props.device_trusted = !!viewer.device_trusted
+      if (viewer?.first_sign_in_at) props.first_sign_in_at = ['__setOnce__', viewer.first_sign_in_at]
+      if (viewer?.created_at) props.account_created_at = ['__setOnce__', viewer.created_at]
+      identify({ user_id: String(uid), properties: props })
+    } else if (uid == null && lastUserIdRef.current != null) {
+      // Sign-out edge — App-level reset is handled separately by the
+      // sign-out gesture that fires User Signed Out. Clear our local
+      // memo so a fresh sign-in re-fires identify.
+      lastUserIdRef.current = null
+    }
+  }, [me?.authenticated, me?.user?.id, me?.user?.role, me?.user?.permission_state, me?.user?.passcode_set, me?.user?.device_trusted])
 
   useEffect(() => {
     const handler = () => setConsentReopenTick(t => t + 1)
@@ -87,11 +141,15 @@ export default function App() {
   // The deployment is in private beta: anonymous visitors get the full
   // app in read-only mode (viewer = null is passed through to every
   // component), and write affordances are hidden at the component
-  // level. /beta-pending is the post-OAuth-rejection page reachable by
-  // anyone. The original §14.1 Landing surface is retained for the
-  // `/welcome` URL only, in case a deployment wants to link to it.
+  // level. v0.8.0 (§6.1 / item #6): authenticated users with
+  // `permission_state='pending'` also pass through as `viewer` with
+  // their state attached — every write-gated affordance reads the
+  // state and treats pending the same as anonymous, while reads
+  // remain open. The /beta-pending page is the home root for a
+  // pending user.
   const viewer = me?.authenticated ? me.user : null
   const isAdmin = viewer && (viewer.role === 'owner' || viewer.role === 'admin')
+  const isPending = viewer && viewer.permission_state === 'pending'
 
   return (
     <div className="app">
@@ -107,6 +165,9 @@ export default function App() {
           <Link to="/philosophy" className="header-about" title="Why this exists (§14)">
             About
           </Link>
+          <Link to="/docs" className="header-about" title="User guide">
+            Docs
+          </Link>
           {viewer && (
             <Link to="/settings/notifications" className="header-settings" title="Notification settings (§15)">
               Settings
@@ -133,7 +194,20 @@ export default function App() {
             <>
               <span className="user-name">{viewer.display_name}</span>
               <span className={`user-role-badge role-${viewer.role}`}>{viewer.role}</span>
-              <a className="btn-link" href="/auth/logout">Sign out</a>
+              <a
+                className="btn-link"
+                href="/auth/logout"
+                onClick={() => {
+                  // v0.15.0 — fire the sign-out event before the
+                  // hard nav. The wrapper's track() is sync-enqueue;
+                  // the underlying SDK flush is best-effort across
+                  // navigation. anonymize() clears the user binding
+                  // so any post-nav anonymous events on the next
+                  // page aren't attributed to the prior user.
+                  track(EVENTS.USER_SIGNED_OUT)
+                  anonymize()
+                }}
+              >Sign out</a>
             </>
           ) : (
             <Link className="btn-signin-header" to="/login" title="Private beta — only invited emails can sign in">
@@ -142,12 +216,24 @@ export default function App() {
           )}
         </div>
       </header>
+      {isPending && <PendingAccessBanner />}
       <div className="app-body">
         <Routes>
           <Route path="/welcome" element={<Landing />} />
           <Route path="/login" element={<Login />} />
-          <Route path="/beta-pending" element={<BetaPending />} />
+          <Route path="/beta-pending" element={<BetaPending viewer={viewer} />} />
+          {/* v0.16.0 (item #12): per-RFC invitation acceptance landing.
+              Anonymous viewers see a sign-in prompt; signed-in users
+              see the preview + accept gesture. */}
+          <Route path="/invitations/accept" element={
+            <PolicyShell><AcceptInvitation viewer={viewer} /></PolicyShell>
+          } />
+          {/* v0.17.0 — roadmap item #16. The claim landing page for
+              admin-issued invites. Anonymous-reachable; the call
+              itself establishes the session on success. */}
+          <Route path="/invites/claim" element={<InviteClaim />} />
           <Route path="/philosophy" element={<PhilosophyWithSidebar viewer={viewer} />} />
+          <Route path="/docs" element={<DocsWithSidebar viewer={viewer} />} />
           {/* §14.5 / §14.6: cookie-consent companions to /philosophy.
               Available to anonymous and authenticated viewers alike. */}
           <Route path="/privacy" element={<PolicyShell><Privacy /></PolicyShell>} />
@@ -216,6 +302,14 @@ function PhilosophyWithSidebar({ viewer }) {
   )
 }
 
+function DocsWithSidebar({ viewer }) {
+  return (
+    <main className="chrome-pane">
+      <Docs authenticated={!!viewer} />
+    </main>
+  )
+}
+
 function NotificationSettingsWithSidebar({ viewer }) {
   return (
     <main className="chrome-pane">
@@ -232,7 +326,26 @@ function AdminWithSidebar({ viewer }) {
   )
 }
 
+function PendingAccessBanner() {
+  // v0.8.0 — thin banner shown on every page (other than /beta-pending
+  // itself, which carries the same message in larger form) when the
+  // signed-in user's `permission_state='pending'`. Sign-out works
+  // normally via the header affordance.
+  return (
+    <div className="pending-access-banner">
+      Your beta access request is in review.{' '}
+      <Link to="/beta-pending">Learn more →</Link>
+    </div>
+  )
+}
+
 function Welcome({ viewer }) {
+  // v0.8.0 — a pending user landing on "/" gets the same page they'd
+  // see at /beta-pending, inline. This is the post-OTC home root for
+  // a user awaiting admin grant.
+  if (viewer && viewer.permission_state === 'pending') {
+    return <BetaPending viewer={viewer} />
+  }
   if (!viewer) {
     return (
       <div className="welcome">

frontend/src/api.js

@@ -31,24 +31,125 @@ export async function getMe() {
 // migration — the new UI just no longer points at it primarily. These
 // two helpers drive the Login.jsx surface.
 
-export async function requestOtc(email) {
+export async function requestOtc(email, { turnstileToken } = {}) {
+  // v0.12.0 / roadmap item #10: when the Turnstile widget has produced
+  // a token, send it alongside the email so the backend can siteverify
+  // before the OTC dispatch. The backend treats a missing token as
+  // either soft-fail (no secret wired AND TURNSTILE_REQUIRED=false)
+  // or hard-fail (verification required) — the frontend stays
+  // uninvolved in the policy.
+  const body = { email }
+  if (turnstileToken) body.turnstile_token = turnstileToken
   const res = await fetch('/auth/otc/request', {
     method: 'POST',
     headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' },
-    body: JSON.stringify({ email }),
+    body: JSON.stringify(body),
   })
   return jsonOrThrow(res)
 }
 
-export async function verifyOtc(email, code) {
+export async function verifyOtc(email, code, { trustDevice = false } = {}) {
+  // v0.11.0 — `trustDevice` is the "trust this device for 30 days"
+  // checkbox on the Login.jsx OTC step. When true, the server mints
+  // a fresh device-trust row and sets the long-lived cookie; on
+  // subsequent visits, the cookie skips the OTC roundtrip via
+  // `startDeviceTrust()`.
   const res = await fetch('/auth/otc/verify', {
     method: 'POST',
     headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' },
-    body: JSON.stringify({ email, code }),
+    body: JSON.stringify({ email, code, trust_device: !!trustDevice }),
   })
   return jsonOrThrow(res)
 }
 
+// ── v0.8.0: open beta-access request flow (§6.1 / §14.1) ─────────────────
+//
+// On the first OTC sign-in, the user lands in `permission_state='pending'`
+// and `/api/auth/me` reports `needs_profile=true`. The Login.jsx surface
+// then prompts for first/last/why and POSTs them here. After this lands,
+// the user sees the /beta-pending page until an admin grants access.
+
+export async function submitBetaRequest({ first_name, last_name, beta_request_reason }) {
+  const res = await fetch('/api/auth/me/beta-request', {
+    method: 'POST',
+    headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' },
+    body: JSON.stringify({ first_name, last_name, beta_request_reason }),
+  })
+  return jsonOrThrow(res)
+}
+
+// ── v0.10.0: user-set passcodes after OTC (§6.2, roadmap item #8) ─────────
+//
+// After a successful OTC sign-in, a contributor may set a passcode and
+// use email + passcode for subsequent sign-ins. OTC remains the
+// forgot-passcode fallback — 5 consecutive verify failures locks the
+// passcode path for 15 minutes (HTTP 423); the OTC path is unaffected.
+
+export async function checkPasscode(email) {
+  // Anonymous endpoint. Returns `{has_passcode: boolean}` so the
+  // Login.jsx flow can decide whether to render a passcode input or
+  // fall back to OTC. We URL-encode the email so addresses with '+'
+  // round-trip cleanly.
+  const params = new URLSearchParams({ email })
+  const res = await fetch(`/auth/passcode/check?${params}`)
+  return jsonOrThrow(res)
+}
+
+export async function verifyPasscode(email, passcode, { trustDevice = false } = {}) {
+  // v0.11.0 — same trust-device opt-in as `verifyOtc`.
+  const res = await fetch('/auth/passcode/verify', {
+    method: 'POST',
+    headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' },
+    body: JSON.stringify({ email, passcode, trust_device: !!trustDevice }),
+  })
+  return jsonOrThrow(res)
+}
+
+// ── v0.11.0: trust device for 30 days (§6.2, roadmap item #9) ─────────────
+//
+// On a returning visit with a valid device-trust cookie, `startDeviceTrust`
+// re-establishes the session without an OTC / passcode roundtrip. The
+// cookie is HttpOnly so the client cannot read it; the call is a pure POST
+// that the browser attaches the cookie to automatically.
+//
+// `listMyDevices`, `revokeMyDevice`, and `revokeAllMyDevices` drive the
+// /settings/devices revoke-device UI. The signed-in user is the implicit
+// subject; the cookie carries the session.
+
+export async function startDeviceTrust() {
+  const res = await fetch('/auth/device-trust/start', { method: 'POST' })
+  return jsonOrThrow(res)
+}
+
+export async function listMyDevices() {
+  return jsonOrThrow(await fetch('/api/auth/me/devices'))
+}
+
+export async function revokeMyDevice(deviceId) {
+  return jsonOrThrow(await fetch(`/api/auth/me/devices/${deviceId}`, { method: 'DELETE' }))
+}
+
+export async function revokeAllMyDevices() {
+  return jsonOrThrow(await fetch('/api/auth/me/devices', { method: 'DELETE' }))
+}
+
+export async function setPasscode(passcode) {
+  // Requires an active session — the server returns 401 if not signed
+  // in. The signed-in user is the implicit subject; the body carries
+  // only the new passcode.
+  const res = await fetch('/auth/passcode/set', {
+    method: 'POST',
+    headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' },
+    body: JSON.stringify({ passcode }),
+  })
+  return jsonOrThrow(res)
+}
+
+export async function clearPasscode() {
+  const res = await fetch('/auth/passcode', { method: 'DELETE' })
+  return jsonOrThrow(res)
+}
+
 export async function listRFCs() {
   return jsonOrThrow(await fetch('/api/rfcs'))
 }
@@ -221,6 +322,48 @@ export async function resolveThread(slug, branch, threadId) {
   return jsonOrThrow(res)
 }
 
+// ── v0.16.0: owner-only invite for per-RFC PR or PR-less discussion ──────
+//
+// roadmap item #12 / §6 / §10. The RFC's owner invites specific emails
+// to one of two per-RFC roles ('contributor' or 'discussant'); the
+// invitee accepts via the email-encoded token after signing in. The
+// platform-level grant remains the admin's decision (per item #6 /
+// v0.8.0) — these endpoints control per-RFC membership only.
+
+export async function listRFCInvitations(slug) {
+  return jsonOrThrow(await fetch(`/api/rfcs/${slug}/invitations`))
+}
+
+export async function createRFCInvitation(slug, { inviteeEmail, roleInRFC }) {
+  const res = await fetch(`/api/rfcs/${slug}/invitations`, {
+    method: 'POST',
+    headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' },
+    body: JSON.stringify({ invitee_email: inviteeEmail, role_in_rfc: roleInRFC }),
+  })
+  return jsonOrThrow(res)
+}
+
+export async function revokeRFCInvitation(slug, invitationId) {
+  const res = await fetch(`/api/rfcs/${slug}/invitations/${invitationId}/revoke`, {
+    method: 'POST',
+  })
+  return jsonOrThrow(res)
+}
+
+export async function previewInvitation(token) {
+  const params = new URLSearchParams({ token })
+  return jsonOrThrow(await fetch(`/api/invitations/accept?${params}`))
+}
+
+export async function acceptInvitation(token) {
+  const res = await fetch('/api/invitations/accept', {
+    method: 'POST',
+    headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' },
+    body: JSON.stringify({ token }),
+  })
+  return jsonOrThrow(res)
+}
+
 // ── v0.5.0: PR-less per-RFC discussion (§5 / §10) ────────────────────────
 //
 // The substrate is `threads.branch_name IS NULL` — the same threads
@@ -573,6 +716,10 @@ export async function getPhilosophy() {
   return jsonOrThrow(await fetch('/api/philosophy'))
 }
 
+export async function getDocs() {
+  return jsonOrThrow(await fetch('/api/docs'))
+}
+
 // ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 // Slice 7: admin neighborhood (§17 admin/* + user search for the §15.8 mute
 // typeahead).
@@ -598,6 +745,19 @@ export async function setUserMute(userId, muted) {
   }))
 }
 
+// v0.9.0 — roadmap item #7. Flip a user's permission_state between
+// 'pending', 'granted', and 'revoked'. The Users tab on the admin
+// page wires Grant / Revoke buttons against this endpoint; the
+// returned `changed` flag is false when the requested state already
+// matched the row.
+export async function setUserPermission(userId, state) {
+  return jsonOrThrow(await fetch(`/api/admin/users/${userId}/permission`, {
+    method: 'POST',
+    headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' },
+    body: JSON.stringify({ state }),
+  }))
+}
+
 export async function listAuditLog({ actionKind, actorUserId, rfcSlug, beforeId, limit } = {}) {
   const params = new URLSearchParams()
   if (actionKind) params.set('action_kind', actionKind)
@@ -639,6 +799,53 @@ export async function removeAllowlistEmail(email) {
   }))
 }
 
+// v0.17.0 — roadmap item #16. Admin-create user + invite email with
+// optional custom message. The frontend modal on /admin/users wires
+// these two helpers; the claim helper drives the /invites/claim page
+// that the invitee lands on when they click the email link.
+//
+// `createUserInvite` returns `{ ok, invite_id, invited_user_id, email,
+// role }`. The 409 path (duplicate email) and 422 path (self-invite,
+// owner-grant-by-non-owner, malformed input) surface as thrown errors
+// via `jsonOrThrow` so the modal can render the server's message.
+//
+// `listUserInvites` returns the active-invites list for the admin's
+// "I sent these but they haven't been claimed yet" view. Active means
+// not claimed and not expired; once the invitee clicks through, the
+// row clears here and the user-listing's `pending_invite` badge
+// vanishes alongside.
+
+export async function createUserInvite({ email, first_name, last_name, role, custom_message }) {
+  return jsonOrThrow(await fetch('/api/admin/users', {
+    method: 'POST',
+    headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' },
+    body: JSON.stringify({
+      email,
+      first_name: first_name || '',
+      last_name: last_name || '',
+      role,
+      custom_message: custom_message || '',
+    }),
+  }))
+}
+
+export async function listUserInvites() {
+  return jsonOrThrow(await fetch('/api/admin/users/invites'))
+}
+
+// Claim an admin-issued invite token. Anonymous endpoint — the invitee
+// is not yet signed in; this call establishes the session on success.
+// `trustDevice` mirrors the v0.11.0 OTC/passcode opt-in: when true,
+// the server mints a fresh device-trust row + sets the long-lived
+// cookie so the invitee skips OTC on their next visit.
+export async function claimInvite(token, { trustDevice = false } = {}) {
+  return jsonOrThrow(await fetch('/api/invites/claim', {
+    method: 'POST',
+    headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' },
+    body: JSON.stringify({ token, trust_device: !!trustDevice }),
+  }))
+}
+
 export async function searchUsers(q) {
   const params = new URLSearchParams()
   if (q) params.set('q', q)

frontend/src/components/AcceptInvitation.jsx

@@ -0,0 +1,207 @@
+// AcceptInvitation.jsx — v0.16.0 / roadmap item #12.
+//
+// The /invitations/accept?token=... landing page the invitation email
+// links to. The page:
+//
+//   1. Reads `?token=...` from the URL.
+//   2. Calls GET /api/invitations/accept?token=... to preview what the
+//      invitation grants (RFC title, role-in-RFC, expiry, whether the
+//      currently-signed-in user's email matches the invitee's).
+//   3. Renders a confirmation surface — name the RFC, name the role,
+//      and either show "Accept" (when the email matches and the
+//      invitation is still pending) or a refusal message (expired,
+//      revoked, email mismatch).
+//   4. On accept, POST /api/invitations/accept lands the
+//      rfc_collaborators row and the page redirects to the RFC's view.
+//
+// For an anonymous viewer who lands here without signing in, the
+// preview call 401s and the page tells them to sign in. After
+// signing in (via the existing OTC/passcode surface at /login) they
+// can return to the same URL — the token is stable.
+
+import { useEffect, useState } from 'react'
+import { Link, useNavigate, useSearchParams } from 'react-router-dom'
+import { acceptInvitation, previewInvitation } from '../api'
+import { EVENTS, identify, track } from '../lib/analytics'
+
+export default function AcceptInvitation({ viewer }) {
+  const [searchParams] = useSearchParams()
+  const navigate = useNavigate()
+  const token = searchParams.get('token') || ''
+
+  const [preview, setPreview] = useState(null)
+  const [previewError, setPreviewError] = useState(null)
+  const [accepting, setAccepting] = useState(false)
+  const [acceptError, setAcceptError] = useState(null)
+
+  useEffect(() => {
+    if (!token) {
+      setPreviewError('No invitation token in the URL.')
+      return
+    }
+    if (!viewer) {
+      // Not signed in — the preview endpoint will 401. We surface a
+      // sign-in prompt without making the request.
+      return
+    }
+    previewInvitation(token)
+      .then(setPreview)
+      .catch(err => setPreviewError(err.message || 'Could not load invitation.'))
+  }, [token, viewer])
+
+  async function handleAccept() {
+    setAccepting(true)
+    setAcceptError(null)
+    try {
+      const result = await acceptInvitation(token)
+      // v0.16.0 + #21 Part C — re-identify with per-RFC invite
+      // properties on accept, BEFORE the track event fires, so the
+      // Amplitude user record carries the invite context from the
+      // moment of acceptance. setOnce on invited_at preserves the
+      // first-accepted timestamp if the same user accepts multiple
+      // RFC invitations.
+      if (viewer?.id != null) {
+        identify({
+          user_id: String(viewer.id),
+          properties: {
+            invited_at: ['__setOnce__', new Date().toISOString()],
+            last_invited_to_rfc: result.rfc_slug,
+            last_invite_role_in_rfc: result.role_in_rfc || preview?.role_in_rfc,
+            claim_method: 'rfc-invite',
+          },
+        })
+      }
+      track(EVENTS.INVITATION_ACCEPTED, {
+        rfc_slug: result.rfc_slug,
+        role_in_rfc: result.role_in_rfc || preview?.role_in_rfc,
+      })
+      navigate(`/rfc/${result.rfc_slug}`)
+    } catch (err) {
+      setAcceptError(err.message || 'Could not accept invitation.')
+    } finally {
+      setAccepting(false)
+    }
+  }
+
+  if (!token) {
+    return (
+      <div className="accept-invitation">
+        <h1>Invitation link is malformed</h1>
+        <p>No <code>token</code> parameter was found. Ask the person who
+          invited you to re-send the link.</p>
+        <p><Link to="/">Return to the catalog</Link></p>
+      </div>
+    )
+  }
+
+  if (!viewer) {
+    return (
+      <div className="accept-invitation">
+        <h1>Sign in to accept your invitation</h1>
+        <p>
+          You've been invited to collaborate on an RFC. Sign in first so we
+          can attach the membership to your account, then return to this
+          link.
+        </p>
+        <p>
+          <Link to="/login" className="btn-primary">Sign in</Link>
+        </p>
+      </div>
+    )
+  }
+
+  if (previewError) {
+    return (
+      <div className="accept-invitation">
+        <h1>Invitation unavailable</h1>
+        <p>{previewError}</p>
+        <p><Link to="/">Return to the catalog</Link></p>
+      </div>
+    )
+  }
+
+  if (!preview) {
+    return <div className="accept-invitation">Loading invitation…</div>
+  }
+
+  const { rfc_title, rfc_slug, role_in_rfc, status, invitee_email, email_matches_you } = preview
+
+  if (status === 'revoked') {
+    return (
+      <div className="accept-invitation">
+        <h1>Invitation revoked</h1>
+        <p>
+          The owner of <strong>{rfc_title}</strong> revoked this invitation.
+          Ask them to re-issue it if you should still have access.
+        </p>
+        <p><Link to={`/rfc/${rfc_slug}`}>Read the RFC anyway</Link></p>
+      </div>
+    )
+  }
+  if (status === 'expired') {
+    return (
+      <div className="accept-invitation">
+        <h1>Invitation expired</h1>
+        <p>
+          This invitation to <strong>{rfc_title}</strong> has expired. Ask
+          the RFC's owner to issue a fresh one.
+        </p>
+        <p><Link to={`/rfc/${rfc_slug}`}>Read the RFC anyway</Link></p>
+      </div>
+    )
+  }
+  if (status === 'accepted') {
+    return (
+      <div className="accept-invitation">
+        <h1>Already accepted</h1>
+        <p>
+          You've already accepted this invitation. You can{' '}
+          <Link to={`/rfc/${rfc_slug}`}>open {rfc_title}</Link> now.
+        </p>
+      </div>
+    )
+  }
+
+  if (!email_matches_you) {
+    return (
+      <div className="accept-invitation">
+        <h1>This invitation is for a different account</h1>
+        <p>
+          This invitation was sent to <strong>{invitee_email}</strong>. You're
+          currently signed in as <strong>{viewer.email || viewer.gitea_login}</strong>.
+          Sign out and sign back in with the invited address to accept.
+        </p>
+        <p><a className="btn-link" href="/auth/logout">Sign out</a></p>
+      </div>
+    )
+  }
+
+  return (
+    <div className="accept-invitation">
+      <h1>Join {rfc_title}</h1>
+      <p>
+        You've been invited to <strong>{rfc_title}</strong> as a{' '}
+        <strong>{role_in_rfc}</strong>.
+      </p>
+      <p style={{ color: '#666' }}>
+        {role_in_rfc === 'contributor'
+          ? 'Contributors can open PRs against this RFC and join its discussion.'
+          : 'Discussants can post in this RFC\'s discussion.'}
+      </p>
+      {acceptError && <div className="error-banner">{acceptError}</div>}
+      <p>
+        <button
+          type="button"
+          className="btn-primary"
+          onClick={handleAccept}
+          disabled={accepting}
+        >
+          {accepting ? 'Accepting…' : `Accept and open ${rfc_title}`}
+        </button>
+      </p>
+      <p>
+        <Link to={`/rfc/${rfc_slug}`}>or just read the RFC without accepting</Link>
+      </p>
+    </div>
+  )
+}

frontend/src/components/Admin.jsx

@@ -16,13 +16,22 @@ import {
   listAdminUsers,
   setUserRole,
   setUserMute,
+  setUserPermission,
   listAuditLog,
   listPermissionEvents,
   listGraduationQueue,
   listAllowlist,
   addAllowlistEmail,
   removeAllowlistEmail,
+  createUserInvite,
 } from '../api.js'
+import { EVENTS, track } from '../lib/analytics.js'
+
+// v0.17.0 — roadmap item #16. The max length the backend enforces
+// (Pydantic body bound + `invites.CUSTOM_MESSAGE_MAX_LENGTH`); kept
+// here so the modal's "remaining chars" counter stays in lockstep
+// with the server-side bound.
+const CUSTOM_MESSAGE_MAX_LENGTH = 500
 
 const TABS = [
   { path: 'users', label: 'Users' },
@@ -68,12 +77,30 @@ export default function Admin({ viewer }) {
   )
 }
 
-// ── Users + role + write-mute (§6.1 / §6.2) ────────────────────────────────
+// ── Users + role + write-mute + permission grant/revoke (§6.1 / §6.2) ──────
+//
+// v0.9.0 (roadmap item #7) lands the user-management surface. The table
+// shows every user with their permission_state, sign-up reason (when
+// pending), role, write-mute, and Grant / Revoke controls. State filter
+// chips above the table narrow to one bucket — the "Pending" chip is the
+// admin's daily inbox shape.
+
+const STATE_CHIPS = [
+  { value: 'all', label: 'All' },
+  { value: 'pending', label: 'Pending' },
+  { value: 'granted', label: 'Granted' },
+  { value: 'revoked', label: 'Revoked' },
+]
 
 function UsersTab() {
   const [users, setUsers] = useState(null)
   const [busy, setBusy] = useState({})
   const [error, setError] = useState(null)
+  const [stateFilter, setStateFilter] = useState('all')
+  // v0.17.0 — roadmap item #16. The "Create user + invite" modal's
+  // open/closed state. The modal is local to UsersTab (it only opens
+  // from the header button) and refreshes the listing on success.
+  const [inviteModalOpen, setInviteModalOpen] = useState(false)
 
   async function refresh() {
     setError(null)
@@ -113,68 +140,400 @@ function UsersTab() {
     }
   }
 
+  async function flipPermission(userId, state) {
+    setBusy(b => ({ ...b, [userId]: true }))
+    setError(null)
+    try {
+      await setUserPermission(userId, state)
+      // v0.15.0 — analytics: fire on a successful §6.1 grant/revoke.
+      // action collapses the {pending → granted, revoked → granted}
+      // edges onto `grant`, and `granted → revoked` onto `revoke`,
+      // matching the roadmap's two-arm taxonomy.
+      const action = state === 'granted' ? 'grant' : 'revoke'
+      track(EVENTS.ADMIN_PERMISSION_DECISION, { action, target_user_id: String(userId) })
+      // Refresh the full row so permission_decided_{at,by_*} update too.
+      await refresh()
+    } catch (e) {
+      setError(e.message)
+    } finally {
+      setBusy(b => ({ ...b, [userId]: false }))
+    }
+  }
+
+  const counts = useMemo(() => {
+    const c = { all: 0, pending: 0, granted: 0, revoked: 0 }
+    if (users) {
+      c.all = users.length
+      for (const u of users) {
+        const s = u.permission_state || 'granted'
+        if (s in c) c[s] += 1
+      }
+    }
+    return c
+  }, [users])
+
   if (users == null) return <p className="muted">Loading users…</p>
 
+  const filtered = stateFilter === 'all'
+    ? users
+    : users.filter(u => (u.permission_state || 'granted') === stateFilter)
+
   return (
     <div className="admin-tab">
       <header className="admin-tab-header">
         <h2>Users</h2>
         <p className="muted">
-          Role changes write to <code>permission_events</code>. The §6.2
-          write-mute applies to contributors only — promote to admin to
-          remove a user's ability to write without silencing them.
+          The pending bucket is the beta-access review queue (§6.1 /
+          v0.8.0). Grant or revoke writes to <code>permission_events</code>
+          and stamps <code>permission_decided_by</code> +{' '}
+          <code>permission_decided_at</code>. Role and write-mute controls
+          retain their v0.7.0 semantics — promote to admin to remove a
+          user's ability to write without silencing them.
         </p>
+        {/* v0.17.0 — roadmap item #16. The "Create user + invite"
+            affordance opens a modal that provisions a fresh users row
+            with the chosen role and sends an invite email with a
+            single-use claim link. */}
+        <div className="admin-tab-actions">
+          <button
+            type="button"
+            className="btn-primary"
+            onClick={() => setInviteModalOpen(true)}
+          >Create user + invite</button>
+        </div>
       </header>
       {error && <p className="settings-note warning">{error}</p>}
-      <table className="admin-table">
-        <thead>
-          <tr>
-            <th>User</th>
-            <th>Role</th>
-            <th>Write-muted</th>
-            <th>Last seen</th>
-          </tr>
-        </thead>
-        <tbody>
-          {users.map(u => (
-            <tr key={u.id}>
-              <td>
-                <div className="user-cell">
-                  <span className="user-handle">@{u.gitea_login}</span>
-                  <span className="muted">{u.display_name}</span>
-                </div>
-              </td>
-              <td>
-                <select
-                  value={u.role}
-                  onChange={e => changeRole(u.id, e.target.value)}
-                  disabled={!!busy[u.id]}
-                >
-                  <option value="contributor">Contributor</option>
-                  <option value="admin">Admin</option>
-                  <option value="owner">Owner</option>
-                </select>
-              </td>
-              <td>
-                {u.role === 'contributor' ? (
-                  <label className="mute-toggle">
-                    <input
-                      type="checkbox"
-                      checked={!!u.muted}
-                      onChange={e => toggleMute(u.id, e.target.checked)}
-                      disabled={!!busy[u.id]}
-                    />
-                    {u.muted ? 'Muted' : 'Active'}
-                  </label>
-                ) : (
-                  <span className="muted">N/A</span>
-                )}
-              </td>
-              <td className="muted">{u.last_seen_at}</td>
+      {inviteModalOpen && (
+        <CreateUserInviteModal
+          onClose={() => setInviteModalOpen(false)}
+          onSuccess={async () => {
+            setInviteModalOpen(false)
+            await refresh()
+          }}
+        />
+      )}
+
+      <div className="admin-filter-chips">
+        {STATE_CHIPS.map(chip => (
+          <button
+            key={chip.value}
+            type="button"
+            className={`admin-chip${stateFilter === chip.value ? ' active' : ''}`}
+            onClick={() => setStateFilter(chip.value)}
+          >
+            {chip.label} <span className="admin-chip-count">{counts[chip.value] ?? 0}</span>
+          </button>
+        ))}
+      </div>
+
+      {filtered.length === 0 ? (
+        <p className="muted">No users in this bucket.</p>
+      ) : (
+        <table className="admin-table admin-users-table">
+          <thead>
+            <tr>
+              <th>User</th>
+              <th>State</th>
+              <th>Role</th>
+              <th>Write-muted</th>
+              <th>Signed up</th>
+              <th>Last seen</th>
             </tr>
-          ))}
-        </tbody>
-      </table>
+          </thead>
+          <tbody>
+            {filtered.map(u => (
+              <UserRow
+                key={u.id}
+                user={u}
+                busy={!!busy[u.id]}
+                onChangeRole={role => changeRole(u.id, role)}
+                onToggleMute={muted => toggleMute(u.id, muted)}
+                onFlipPermission={state => flipPermission(u.id, state)}
+              />
+            ))}
+          </tbody>
+        </table>
+      )}
+    </div>
+  )
+}
+
+function UserRow({ user: u, busy, onChangeRole, onToggleMute, onFlipPermission }) {
+  const state = u.permission_state || 'granted'
+  const fullName = [u.first_name, u.last_name].filter(Boolean).join(' ').trim()
+  const handle = u.gitea_login ? `@${u.gitea_login}` : (u.email || u.display_name)
+  // v0.17.0 — roadmap item #16. The user's row may also be the
+  // "(pending invite)" shape: admin-created via POST /api/admin/users,
+  // not yet claimed via /api/invites/claim. The backend's user-listing
+  // surfaces this via `pending_invite` (object with invite_id +
+  // expires_at) or null. The badge sits inline next to the handle so
+  // the admin sees at a glance which rows are real users vs. unclaimed
+  // invites.
+  const pendingInvite = u.pending_invite
+  return (
+    <>
+      <tr>
+        <td>
+          <div className="user-cell">
+            <span className="user-handle">{handle}</span>
+            {pendingInvite && (
+              <span
+                className="invite-badge"
+                title={`Admin-created invite; expires ${pendingInvite.expires_at}`}
+              >(pending invite)</span>
+            )}
+            <span className="muted">
+              {fullName || u.display_name}
+              {u.email ? ` · ${u.email}` : ''}
+            </span>
+          </div>
+        </td>
+        <td>
+          <PermissionCell user={u} busy={busy} onFlipPermission={onFlipPermission} />
+        </td>
+        <td>
+          <select
+            value={u.role}
+            onChange={e => onChangeRole(e.target.value)}
+            disabled={busy}
+          >
+            <option value="contributor">Contributor</option>
+            <option value="admin">Admin</option>
+            <option value="owner">Owner</option>
+          </select>
+        </td>
+        <td>
+          {u.role === 'contributor' ? (
+            <label className="mute-toggle">
+              <input
+                type="checkbox"
+                checked={!!u.muted}
+                onChange={e => onToggleMute(e.target.checked)}
+                disabled={busy}
+              />
+              {u.muted ? 'Muted' : 'Active'}
+            </label>
+          ) : (
+            <span className="muted">N/A</span>
+          )}
+        </td>
+        <td className="muted">{u.created_at || '—'}</td>
+        <td className="muted">{u.last_seen_at || '—'}</td>
+      </tr>
+      {state === 'pending' && u.beta_request_reason ? (
+        <tr className="user-row-reason">
+          <td colSpan={6}>
+            <div className="user-reason-block">
+              <strong>Why they want access:</strong>
+              <p>{u.beta_request_reason}</p>
+            </div>
+          </td>
+        </tr>
+      ) : null}
+    </>
+  )
+}
+
+function PermissionCell({ user: u, busy, onFlipPermission }) {
+  const state = u.permission_state || 'granted'
+  const decidedSuffix = u.permission_decided_at
+    ? ` · by ${u.permission_decided_by_login ? '@' + u.permission_decided_by_login : '—'} at ${u.permission_decided_at}`
+    : ''
+  return (
+    <div className="permission-cell">
+      <span className={`permission-badge permission-badge-${state}`}>{state}</span>
+      <div className="permission-actions">
+        {state !== 'granted' && (
+          <button
+            type="button"
+            className="btn-link-quiet"
+            disabled={busy}
+            onClick={() => onFlipPermission('granted')}
+          >Grant</button>
+        )}
+        {state === 'granted' && (
+          <button
+            type="button"
+            className="btn-link-quiet"
+            disabled={busy}
+            onClick={() => {
+              if (confirm(`Revoke access for ${u.display_name || u.email}?`)) {
+                onFlipPermission('revoked')
+              }
+            }}
+          >Revoke</button>
+        )}
+      </div>
+      {decidedSuffix && (
+        <div className="permission-decided muted">{decidedSuffix.replace(/^ · /, '')}</div>
+      )}
+    </div>
+  )
+}
+
+// ── Create user + invite modal (v0.17.0 / roadmap item #16) ────────────────
+//
+// The "Create user + invite" affordance on the Users tab opens this
+// modal. Admin types email, first name, last name, role, and (optionally)
+// a custom message to embed in the invite email. On submit, calls
+// `POST /api/admin/users` which provisions the row + sends the email.
+// The 409 path (duplicate email) and 422 path (self-invite, owner-
+// grant-by-non-owner, malformed input) surface the server's message
+// inline; the success path closes the modal and refreshes the listing.
+//
+// The modal lives in this file rather than a separate component
+// because it has one caller (UsersTab), reuses the existing modal
+// stylesheet from /admin's chrome, and shares the
+// CUSTOM_MESSAGE_MAX_LENGTH constant defined at the top of the file.
+
+function CreateUserInviteModal({ onClose, onSuccess }) {
+  const [email, setEmail] = useState('')
+  const [firstName, setFirstName] = useState('')
+  const [lastName, setLastName] = useState('')
+  const [role, setRole] = useState('contributor')
+  const [customMessage, setCustomMessage] = useState('')
+  const [busy, setBusy] = useState(false)
+  const [error, setError] = useState(null)
+  const [success, setSuccess] = useState(null)
+
+  const remaining = CUSTOM_MESSAGE_MAX_LENGTH - customMessage.length
+
+  async function handleSubmit(event) {
+    event.preventDefault()
+    const trimmedEmail = email.trim()
+    if (!trimmedEmail) {
+      setError('Email is required')
+      return
+    }
+    setBusy(true)
+    setError(null)
+    setSuccess(null)
+    try {
+      const result = await createUserInvite({
+        email: trimmedEmail,
+        first_name: firstName.trim(),
+        last_name: lastName.trim(),
+        role,
+        custom_message: customMessage,
+      })
+      // v0.17.0 + #21 Part C — Amplitude wiring. target_user_id is
+      // the OHM user id the invite-create gesture provisioned;
+      // initial_role is what the invitee inherits on claim.
+      // custom_message_chars is a coarse signal of admin effort
+      // (0 = template-only, 1+ = personalized). No PII.
+      track(EVENTS.USER_INVITED, {
+        target_user_id: result.invited_user_id != null
+          ? String(result.invited_user_id) : null,
+        initial_role: result.role,
+        custom_message_chars: (customMessage || '').length,
+      })
+      setSuccess(`Invite sent to ${result.email} (${result.role}).`)
+      // Brief delay so the admin sees the success state, then close
+      // and let the parent refresh the listing.
+      setTimeout(() => { onSuccess?.() }, 600)
+    } catch (e) {
+      setError(e.message || 'Unable to send invite')
+    } finally {
+      setBusy(false)
+    }
+  }
+
+  return (
+    <div className="modal-backdrop" onClick={onClose}>
+      <div className="modal-panel" onClick={e => e.stopPropagation()}>
+        <header className="modal-header">
+          <h3>Create user + invite</h3>
+          <button
+            type="button"
+            className="btn-link-quiet"
+            onClick={onClose}
+            disabled={busy}
+            aria-label="Close"
+          >×</button>
+        </header>
+        <p className="muted">
+          Provisions a fresh user row with the chosen role and sends an
+          invite email carrying a single-use claim link. The link
+          expires in 7 days. The invitee clicks through to claim
+          their account — no OTC roundtrip is required on first sign-in.
+        </p>
+        <form onSubmit={handleSubmit} className="create-user-invite-form">
+          <label>
+            <span>Email</span>
+            <input
+              type="email"
+              value={email}
+              onChange={e => setEmail(e.target.value)}
+              required
+              disabled={busy}
+              autoFocus
+              maxLength={320}
+            />
+          </label>
+          <div className="form-row">
+            <label>
+              <span>First name</span>
+              <input
+                type="text"
+                value={firstName}
+                onChange={e => setFirstName(e.target.value)}
+                disabled={busy}
+                maxLength={120}
+              />
+            </label>
+            <label>
+              <span>Last name</span>
+              <input
+                type="text"
+                value={lastName}
+                onChange={e => setLastName(e.target.value)}
+                disabled={busy}
+                maxLength={120}
+              />
+            </label>
+          </div>
+          <label>
+            <span>Role</span>
+            <select
+              value={role}
+              onChange={e => setRole(e.target.value)}
+              disabled={busy}
+            >
+              <option value="contributor">Contributor</option>
+              <option value="admin">Admin</option>
+              <option value="owner">Owner (owner-only)</option>
+            </select>
+          </label>
+          <label>
+            <span>
+              Custom message (optional){' '}
+              <span className={`muted${remaining < 0 ? ' warning' : ''}`}>
+                {remaining} chars left
+              </span>
+            </span>
+            <textarea
+              value={customMessage}
+              onChange={e => setCustomMessage(e.target.value)}
+              disabled={busy}
+              rows={4}
+              maxLength={CUSTOM_MESSAGE_MAX_LENGTH}
+              placeholder="Optional — embedded in the invite email."
+            />
+          </label>
+          {error && <p className="settings-note warning">{error}</p>}
+          {success && <p className="settings-note success">{success}</p>}
+          <div className="modal-actions">
+            <button type="button" onClick={onClose} disabled={busy}>Cancel</button>
+            <button
+              type="submit"
+              className="btn-primary"
+              disabled={busy || !email.trim() || remaining < 0}
+            >
+              {busy ? 'Sending…' : 'Send invite'}
+            </button>
+          </div>
+        </form>
+      </div>
     </div>
   )
 }

frontend/src/components/BetaPending.jsx

@@ -1,38 +1,62 @@
-// BetaPending.jsx — the post-OAuth-rejection page.
+// BetaPending.jsx — the "your request is in review" page (§6.1 / §14.1).
 //
-// When a deployment is in private-beta mode (i.e. its `allowed_emails`
-// table has any rows), the OAuth callback redirects unrecognised users
-// here instead of provisioning them. The framework cannot know the
-// deployment operator's preferred contact channel — so the deployment
-// supplies one via VITE_BETA_CONTACT (an email, URL, or short
-// instruction). If unset, we render a generic ask-the-operator line.
+// v0.3.0 introduced this surface as the post-OAuth-rejection page (a
+// user whose email wasn't on the `allowed_emails` table bounced here).
+// v0.8.0 (roadmap item #6) repurposes it as the post-OTC pending-grant
+// page: any authenticated user whose `permission_state='pending'` lands
+// here on root visits, after a fresh-OTC profile capture, or via the
+// header "Your beta access is in review" affordance.
+//
+// The deployment supplies a contact channel via VITE_BETA_CONTACT (an
+// email, URL, or short instruction). If unset, we render a generic
+// ask-the-operator line.
 
 import { Link } from 'react-router-dom'
 
-export default function BetaPending() {
+export default function BetaPending({ viewer }) {
   const contact = import.meta.env.VITE_BETA_CONTACT || ''
+  const isPending = viewer?.permission_state === 'pending'
   return (
     <div className="beta-pending">
       <div className="beta-pending-inner">
-        <h1>{import.meta.env.VITE_APP_NAME} is in private Beta.</h1>
-        <p>
-          Discussion and contribution are gated to invited emails for now.
-          Reading is open — every super-draft, every active RFC, and every
-          public conversation is visible without signing in.
-        </p>
+        <h1>
+          {isPending
+            ? 'Your request is in review.'
+            : `${import.meta.env.VITE_APP_NAME} is in private Beta.`}
+        </h1>
+        {isPending ? (
+          <>
+            <p>
+              Thanks for telling us a bit about yourself. The deployment's
+              admins are notified by email as soon as a request lands;
+              we don't commit to a fixed SLA — turnaround depends on
+              operator availability — and the deployment operator is
+              the right person to ask if a wait runs long.
+            </p>
+            <p>
+              While you wait, the catalog on the left lists every super-draft
+              and active RFC in the framework — reading is open. Discussion
+              and contribution unlock once your access is granted.
+            </p>
+          </>
+        ) : (
+          <p>
+            Discussion and contribution are gated to invited contributors for
+            now. Reading is open — every super-draft, every active RFC, and
+            every public conversation is visible without signing in.
+          </p>
+        )}
         {contact ? (
           <p className="beta-pending-contact">
-            To request access, contact <strong>{contact}</strong> with the
-            email address you'd like to sign in with.
+            Questions? Contact <strong>{contact}</strong>.
           </p>
         ) : (
           <p className="beta-pending-contact">
-            To request access, contact the deployment operator with the email
-            address you'd like to sign in with.
+            Questions? Contact the deployment operator.
           </p>
         )}
         <div className="beta-pending-actions">
-          <Link className="btn-primary" to="/">Browse as a guest</Link>
+          <Link className="btn-primary" to="/">Browse the catalog</Link>
           <Link className="btn-link-quiet" to="/philosophy">Read the philosophy →</Link>
         </div>
       </div>

frontend/src/components/Docs.jsx

@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+// `/docs` — the user-facing guide.
+//
+// Sibling of Philosophy.jsx: same chrome, same data path, different
+// source file. Renders DOCS.md verbatim with light chrome around it.
+// Reachable anonymously, same as `/philosophy`, so a visitor can read
+// the guide before deciding to sign in.
+
+import { useEffect, useState } from 'react'
+import { Link, useNavigate } from 'react-router-dom'
+import MarkdownPreview from './MarkdownPreview.jsx'
+import { getDocs } from '../api.js'
+
+export default function Docs({ authenticated }) {
+  const [body, setBody] = useState('')
+  const [error, setError] = useState(null)
+  const [loading, setLoading] = useState(true)
+  const navigate = useNavigate()
+
+  useEffect(() => {
+    let active = true
+    getDocs()
+      .then(r => { if (active) setBody(r.body || '') })
+      .catch(e => { if (active) setError(e.message || String(e)) })
+      .finally(() => { if (active) setLoading(false) })
+    return () => { active = false }
+  }, [])
+
+  return (
+    <div className="philosophy-page">
+      <header className="philosophy-header">
+        <button
+          className="philosophy-back"
+          onClick={() => (history.length > 1 ? navigate(-1) : navigate('/'))}
+        >
+          ← Back
+        </button>
+        <span className="philosophy-title">User guide</span>
+        {!authenticated && (
+          <Link className="philosophy-signin" to="/">Home</Link>
+        )}
+      </header>
+      <article className="philosophy-body">
+        {loading && <p className="muted">Loading…</p>}
+        {error && <p className="error">Could not load the guide: {error}</p>}
+        {!loading && !error && (
+          <MarkdownPreview content={body} />
+        )}
+      </article>
+    </div>
+  )
+}

frontend/src/components/InvitationsModal.jsx

@@ -0,0 +1,202 @@
+// InvitationsModal.jsx — v0.16.0 / roadmap item #12.
+//
+// The RFC owner's surface for issuing per-RFC invitations and watching
+// who has accepted. Opens from the RFC view's header strip when the
+// viewer is the RFC's owner (or a platform admin/owner). Non-owner
+// viewers never see the trigger.
+//
+// The modal shows two stacked sections:
+//
+//   1. "Invite someone" — email input + role picker
+//      (contributor | discussant) + Send. The send goes through the
+//      backend's POST /api/rfcs/<slug>/invitations, which both writes
+//      the row and dispatches the email to the invitee. Success
+//      refreshes the list below and clears the input.
+//
+//   2. "Existing invitations" — every invitation (pending +
+//      accepted + revoked + expired) on this RFC, with revoke
+//      buttons on the pending ones. The status of each row is the
+//      effective status (the backend recomputes expired-from-pending
+//      at read time so an unattended cron isn't required).
+//
+// No custom-message field — that belongs to item #16's platform-
+// level surface, not here. No bulk-invite — one email at a time
+// keeps the gesture deliberate.
+
+import { useEffect, useState } from 'react'
+import {
+  createRFCInvitation,
+  listRFCInvitations,
+  revokeRFCInvitation,
+} from '../api'
+import { EVENTS, track } from '../lib/analytics'
+
+const ROLE_OPTIONS = [
+  { value: 'contributor', label: 'Contributor — can open PRs and join discussion' },
+  { value: 'discussant', label: 'Discussant — can join discussion only' },
+]
+
+export default function InvitationsModal({ slug, rfcTitle, onClose }) {
+  const [invitations, setInvitations] = useState(null)
+  const [loadError, setLoadError] = useState(null)
+  const [inviteeEmail, setInviteeEmail] = useState('')
+  const [roleInRFC, setRoleInRFC] = useState('contributor')
+  const [submitting, setSubmitting] = useState(false)
+  const [submitError, setSubmitError] = useState(null)
+  const [submitSuccess, setSubmitSuccess] = useState(null)
+  const [revokingId, setRevokingId] = useState(null)
+
+  async function refresh() {
+    setLoadError(null)
+    try {
+      const r = await listRFCInvitations(slug)
+      setInvitations(r.items || [])
+    } catch (e) {
+      setLoadError(e.message)
+    }
+  }
+
+  useEffect(() => { refresh() /* eslint-disable-line react-hooks/exhaustive-deps */ }, [slug])
+
+  async function handleSend(e) {
+    e.preventDefault()
+    const email = inviteeEmail.trim()
+    if (!email) return
+    setSubmitting(true)
+    setSubmitError(null)
+    setSubmitSuccess(null)
+    try {
+      await createRFCInvitation(slug, { inviteeEmail: email, roleInRFC })
+      // v0.16.0 + #21 Part C — Amplitude wiring. No PII (the email
+      // is the inviter's input, not the invitee's identity in our
+      // analytics; we record the rfc_slug + role_in_rfc so a future
+      // invite→accept correlation has both halves).
+      track(EVENTS.INVITATION_SENT, { rfc_slug: slug, role_in_rfc: roleInRFC })
+      setSubmitSuccess(`Invitation sent to ${email}.`)
+      setInviteeEmail('')
+      await refresh()
+    } catch (err) {
+      setSubmitError(err.message || 'Failed to send invitation.')
+    } finally {
+      setSubmitting(false)
+    }
+  }
+
+  async function handleRevoke(invitationId) {
+    setRevokingId(invitationId)
+    try {
+      await revokeRFCInvitation(slug, invitationId)
+      await refresh()
+    } catch (err) {
+      setSubmitError(err.message || 'Failed to revoke invitation.')
+    } finally {
+      setRevokingId(null)
+    }
+  }
+
+  return (
+    <div className="modal-overlay" onClick={e => { if (e.target === e.currentTarget) onClose() }}>
+      <div className="modal" style={{ maxWidth: 640 }}>
+        <div className="modal-header">
+          <h2>Invitations — {rfcTitle || slug}</h2>
+          <button className="modal-close" onClick={onClose}>×</button>
+        </div>
+        <div className="modal-body">
+          <p style={{ marginTop: 0, color: '#666' }}>
+            Invite people by email to contribute PRs against this RFC or to
+            join its discussion. Anyone with the link can read this RFC;
+            this surface controls who can <em>write</em>.
+          </p>
+
+          <form onSubmit={handleSend} className="invitations-form" style={{ marginTop: 16 }}>
+            <label htmlFor="invitee-email">Invitee email</label>
+            <input
+              id="invitee-email"
+              type="email"
+              value={inviteeEmail}
+              onChange={e => setInviteeEmail(e.target.value)}
+              placeholder="someone@example.com"
+              autoFocus
+              required
+            />
+            <label htmlFor="invitee-role" style={{ marginTop: 10 }}>Role on this RFC</label>
+            <select
+              id="invitee-role"
+              value={roleInRFC}
+              onChange={e => setRoleInRFC(e.target.value)}
+            >
+              {ROLE_OPTIONS.map(opt => (
+                <option key={opt.value} value={opt.value}>{opt.label}</option>
+              ))}
+            </select>
+            <div style={{ marginTop: 12, display: 'flex', gap: 8, alignItems: 'center' }}>
+              <button type="submit" className="btn-primary" disabled={submitting}>
+                {submitting ? 'Sending…' : 'Send invitation'}
+              </button>
+              {submitError && <span style={{ color: '#c33' }}>{submitError}</span>}
+              {submitSuccess && <span style={{ color: '#383' }}>{submitSuccess}</span>}
+            </div>
+          </form>
+
+          <hr style={{ margin: '20px 0' }} />
+
+          <h3 style={{ margin: '0 0 8px' }}>Existing invitations</h3>
+          {loadError && <div className="error-banner">{loadError}</div>}
+          {invitations === null && <div>Loading…</div>}
+          {invitations !== null && invitations.length === 0 && (
+            <div style={{ color: '#666' }}>No invitations have been sent yet.</div>
+          )}
+          {invitations !== null && invitations.length > 0 && (
+            <table style={{ width: '100%', borderCollapse: 'collapse' }}>
+              <thead>
+                <tr>
+                  <th style={{ textAlign: 'left', padding: 4 }}>Email</th>
+                  <th style={{ textAlign: 'left', padding: 4 }}>Role</th>
+                  <th style={{ textAlign: 'left', padding: 4 }}>Status</th>
+                  <th style={{ textAlign: 'left', padding: 4 }}>Sent</th>
+                  <th style={{ padding: 4 }}></th>
+                </tr>
+              </thead>
+              <tbody>
+                {invitations.map(inv => (
+                  <tr key={inv.id} style={{ borderTop: '1px solid #eee' }}>
+                    <td style={{ padding: 4 }}>{inv.invitee_email}</td>
+                    <td style={{ padding: 4 }}>{inv.role_in_rfc}</td>
+                    <td style={{ padding: 4 }}>
+                      <span className={`invitation-status status-${inv.status}`}>
+                        {inv.status}
+                      </span>
+                      {inv.status === 'accepted' && inv.accepted_by_display && (
+                        <span style={{ color: '#666', marginLeft: 6 }}>
+                          by {inv.accepted_by_display}
+                        </span>
+                      )}
+                    </td>
+                    <td style={{ padding: 4, color: '#666' }}>
+                      {inv.created_at?.slice(0, 10) || ''}
+                    </td>
+                    <td style={{ padding: 4, textAlign: 'right' }}>
+                      {inv.status === 'pending' && (
+                        <button
+                          type="button"
+                          className="btn-link"
+                          onClick={() => handleRevoke(inv.id)}
+                          disabled={revokingId === inv.id}
+                        >
+                          {revokingId === inv.id ? 'Revoking…' : 'Revoke'}
+                        </button>
+                      )}
+                    </td>
+                  </tr>
+                ))}
+              </tbody>
+            </table>
+          )}
+        </div>
+        <div className="modal-footer">
+          <button type="button" className="btn-link" onClick={onClose}>Close</button>
+        </div>
+      </div>
+    </div>
+  )
+}

frontend/src/components/InviteClaim.jsx

@@ -0,0 +1,173 @@
+// v0.17.0 — roadmap item #16. The claim flow's landing page.
+//
+// The admin's invite email carries a link to /invites/claim?token=…;
+// the invitee clicks through and lands here. The page reads the
+// token from the URL, posts it to /api/invites/claim, and on success
+// routes either to the passcode-set screen (if v0.10.0 passcode flow
+// is in play and the user has no passcode yet) or to home.
+//
+// Anonymous-reachable: the entire point of the call is to establish
+// the session; we do not pre-check authentication.
+//
+// Failure modes the backend distinguishes:
+//   * 410 — token is expired or already claimed (the row is dead).
+//   * 400 — token doesn't match any active invite (forged, revoked,
+//     or wiped).
+//
+// We surface both as the same "this invite link isn't valid" shape
+// for the invitee — the detail message from the server reads
+// distinctively enough that the admin can debug from logs, and the
+// invitee just needs to know they should contact the admin for a
+// fresh link.
+
+import { useEffect, useState } from 'react'
+import { useLocation, useNavigate } from 'react-router-dom'
+import { claimInvite } from '../api.js'
+import { EVENTS, identify, track } from '../lib/analytics.js'
+
+export default function InviteClaim() {
+  const location = useLocation()
+  const navigate = useNavigate()
+  const [status, setStatus] = useState('working') // 'working' | 'ok' | 'failed'
+  const [error, setError] = useState(null)
+  const [trustDevice, setTrustDevice] = useState(false)
+  const [submitted, setSubmitted] = useState(false)
+  const [user, setUser] = useState(null)
+  const [needsPasscode, setNeedsPasscode] = useState(false)
+
+  const params = new URLSearchParams(location.search)
+  const token = params.get('token') || ''
+
+  async function performClaim() {
+    if (!token) {
+      setStatus('failed')
+      setError('No invite token in the URL.')
+      return
+    }
+    setSubmitted(true)
+    setStatus('working')
+    setError(null)
+    try {
+      const result = await claimInvite(token, { trustDevice })
+      setUser(result.user)
+      setNeedsPasscode(!!result.needs_passcode)
+      // v0.17.0 + #21 Part C — identify the new user with their OHM
+      // user_id BEFORE firing any track() event, so the Amplitude
+      // user record is created with the OHM id from the first event
+      // rather than as an anonymous device that retroactively links.
+      // setOnce on invited_at + invited_by_admin_id + initial_role so
+      // these are immutable user-history markers on the Amplitude
+      // record.
+      if (result.user?.id != null) {
+        const setOnceProps = {
+          claim_method: 'admin-invite',
+        }
+        if (result.invited_at) setOnceProps.invited_at = ['__setOnce__', result.invited_at]
+        if (result.invited_by_admin_id != null) {
+          setOnceProps.invited_by_admin_id = ['__setOnce__', String(result.invited_by_admin_id)]
+        }
+        if (result.user.role) setOnceProps.initial_role = ['__setOnce__', result.user.role]
+        identify({
+          user_id: String(result.user.id),
+          properties: setOnceProps,
+        })
+      }
+      track(EVENTS.INVITE_CLAIMED, {
+        invited_by_admin_id: result.invited_by_admin_id != null
+          ? String(result.invited_by_admin_id) : null,
+        initial_role: result.user?.role,
+        needs_passcode: !!result.needs_passcode,
+        trust_device: trustDevice,
+      })
+      setStatus('ok')
+    } catch (e) {
+      setStatus('failed')
+      setError(e.message || 'Unable to claim invite')
+    }
+  }
+
+  // Pre-flight: if the URL has no token at all, fail fast so the
+  // invitee sees the missing-token shape immediately rather than
+  // an empty form.
+  useEffect(() => {
+    if (!token) {
+      setStatus('failed')
+      setError('This claim link is missing its token.')
+    }
+  }, [token])
+
+  // On a successful claim, route the user onward. The brief calls
+  // this out: route to passcode-set if v0.10.0 passcode flow is in
+  // play and the user has no passcode yet; otherwise route to home.
+  useEffect(() => {
+    if (status !== 'ok') return
+    const timeout = setTimeout(() => {
+      if (needsPasscode) {
+        navigate('/settings/notifications#sign-in', { replace: true })
+      } else {
+        navigate('/', { replace: true })
+      }
+    }, 1200)
+    return () => clearTimeout(timeout)
+  }, [status, needsPasscode, navigate])
+
+  return (
+    <div className="invite-claim-page">
+      <div className="invite-claim-panel">
+        <h1>Claim your account</h1>
+        {!submitted && status === 'working' && token && (
+          <>
+            <p>
+              You've been invited to this deployment. Click the button below
+              to claim your account and sign in. This link is single-use and
+              expires 7 days after it was sent.
+            </p>
+            <label className="claim-trust-toggle">
+              <input
+                type="checkbox"
+                checked={trustDevice}
+                onChange={e => setTrustDevice(e.target.checked)}
+              />
+              {' '}Trust this device for 30 days (skip the email step on
+              your next visit from this browser).
+            </label>
+            <div className="claim-actions">
+              <button
+                type="button"
+                className="btn-primary"
+                onClick={performClaim}
+              >Claim my account</button>
+            </div>
+          </>
+        )}
+        {submitted && status === 'working' && (
+          <p>Claiming…</p>
+        )}
+        {status === 'ok' && (
+          <>
+            <p className="settings-note success">
+              Welcome{user?.display_name ? `, ${user.display_name}` : ''}!
+              You're signed in.
+            </p>
+            <p className="muted">
+              {needsPasscode
+                ? 'Redirecting you to set a passcode so you can sign in without an email roundtrip next time…'
+                : 'Redirecting you to the home page…'}
+            </p>
+          </>
+        )}
+        {status === 'failed' && (
+          <>
+            <p className="settings-note warning">
+              {error || "This invite link isn't valid."}
+            </p>
+            <p className="muted">
+              If you believe this is a mistake, contact the admin who
+              sent you the invite — they can issue a fresh link.
+            </p>
+          </>
+        )}
+      </div>
+    </div>
+  )
+}

frontend/src/components/Login.jsx

@@ -1,43 +1,169 @@
-// Login.jsx — v0.7.0's primary sign-in surface (§6.2).
+// Login.jsx — the composed sign-in surface (§6.2) after the v0.12.0
+// (CloudFlare Turnstile gate on OTC dispatch, roadmap item #10) /
+// v0.10.0 (passcodes, roadmap item #8) rebase onto v0.8.0
+// (beta-access-request capture, §6.1 / §14.1, roadmap item #6). v0.7.0
+// (roadmap item #5) established the email + OTC scaffolding the later
+// releases extended.
 //
-// Two-step:
-//   1. Enter email → POST /auth/otc/request → on 200, advance.
-//      On 429 (rate-limit), surface a "wait a moment" hint and keep
-//      the user on step 1.
-//   2. Enter the six-digit code from the email → POST /auth/otc/verify
-//      → on 200, redirect to the post-login landing. Cmd/Ctrl+Enter
-//      on the code field is the keyboard shortcut.
+// v0.12.0: the email-entry step renders a Turnstile widget. The token
+// it produces is sent to `/auth/otc/request` alongside the email. The
+// passcode step also renders a widget for the "Use a code instead"
+// fallback dispatch (same backend endpoint, same gate). When the
+// `VITE_TURNSTILE_SITE_KEY` build var is unset, the widget renders
+// nothing — the form still submits and the backend's TURNSTILE_REQUIRED
+// policy decides admission.
 //
-// Server-side, /auth/otc/request always returns 202 for an unrecognized
-// email (so the allowlist gate doesn't leak), so this surface never
-// distinguishes "we couldn't reach you" from "we don't know you" —
-// it just advances to step 2. If a user is genuinely blocked, the
-// code never arrives.
+// Four-to-six-step flow (most users see three; the longest path is
+// pending-user with no passcode, who never sees the passcode steps):
 //
-// The legacy Gitea OAuth callback remains at /auth/login → /auth/callback
-// during the v0.7.0 migration; we surface a "Sign in with Gitea" link
-// as a fallback in the footer so users with active OAuth sessions or
-// older invite emails still have a path.
+//   1. 'email'           Enter email → GET /auth/passcode/check.
+//                        * has_passcode=true  → step 'passcode'.
+//                        * has_passcode=false → POST /auth/otc/request,
+//                                               step 'code'.
+//                        429 on either dispatch surfaces a "wait a
+//                        moment" hint and keeps the user on step 1.
+//
+//   2a. 'passcode'       Enter passcode → POST /auth/passcode/verify.
+//                        * 200 → redirect to "/".
+//                        * 423 (lockout, 5 consecutive failures) →
+//                          auto-fall back to OTC by requesting a fresh
+//                          code and advancing to step 'code'.
+//                        * 400 → wrong passcode; user can retry or
+//                          click "Use a code instead" to fall back
+//                          manually.
+//
+//   2b. 'code'           Enter the six-digit code → POST /auth/otc/verify.
+//                        On 200, fetch /api/auth/me and branch:
+//                          * needs_profile === true  → 'capture-profile'
+//                          * has_passcode  === false → 'offer-passcode'
+//                          * otherwise               → redirect to "/".
+//                        needs_profile WINS over has_passcode — a
+//                        pending user goes through the §6.1 capture
+//                        flow first; setting a passcode while waiting
+//                        for admin grant gains them nothing.
+//                        Cmd/Ctrl+Enter on the code field is the
+//                        keyboard shortcut.
+//
+//   3. 'capture-profile' (v0.8.0, §6.1) First name, last name, and "why
+//                        I should be included in the beta" → POST
+//                        /api/auth/me/beta-request → redirect to
+//                        /beta-pending. The user's row stays
+//                        permission_state='pending' until an admin
+//                        grants access; they can set a passcode later
+//                        from settings, or on a future sign-in once
+//                        granted.
+//
+//   4a. 'offer-passcode' (v0.10.0) "Set a passcode for faster sign-in
+//                        next time?" Yes → 'set-passcode'. Skip → "/".
+//
+//   4b. 'set-passcode'   Pick a passcode (4–20 chars) → POST
+//                        /auth/passcode/set → redirect to "/". A
+//                        "Skip for now" link also redirects to "/".
+//
+// Server-side, /auth/otc/request returns 202 uniformly and
+// /auth/passcode/check returns has_passcode=false for an unknown
+// email, so this surface never distinguishes "we couldn't reach you"
+// from "we don't know you" — an unknown email always lands in the
+// OTC path with no account-enumeration signal.
+//
+// The legacy Gitea OAuth callback remains at /auth/login →
+// /auth/callback during the v0.7.0 migration; we surface a "Sign in
+// with Gitea" link as a fallback in the footer so users with active
+// OAuth sessions or older invite emails still have a path. We hide
+// the fallback on 'capture-profile' so a half-captured pending user
+// doesn't bail out into the OAuth path mid-form.
 
 import { useEffect, useRef, useState } from 'react'
 import { useNavigate, Link } from 'react-router-dom'
-import { requestOtc, verifyOtc } from '../api'
+import {
+  requestOtc,
+  verifyOtc,
+  submitBetaRequest,
+  checkPasscode,
+  verifyPasscode,
+  setPasscode as apiSetPasscode,
+  startDeviceTrust,
+} from '../api'
+import TurnstileWidget, { turnstileEnabled } from './TurnstileWidget'
+import { EVENTS, track } from '../lib/analytics'
 
 export default function Login() {
+  // Steps: 'email' → 'passcode' or 'code' → (on the OTC path, after
+  // verify) one of: 'capture-profile' (pending user), 'offer-passcode'
+  // (no passcode yet), or straight to "/". 'set-passcode' is reached
+  // from 'offer-passcode'.
   const [step, setStep] = useState('email')
   const [email, setEmail] = useState('')
   const [code, setCode] = useState('')
+  const [passcode, setPasscode] = useState('')
+  const [newPasscode, setNewPasscode] = useState('')
+  // v0.11.0 — "trust this device for 30 days" checkbox, shared by the
+  // OTC and passcode verify steps. The flag rides on the verify POST;
+  // a checked box mints a device-trust row server-side and sets the
+  // long-lived `rfc_device_trust` cookie. Defaults off so the user
+  // makes an explicit choice — auth credentials shouldn't persist by
+  // default.
+  const [trustDevice, setTrustDevice] = useState(false)
+  // v0.8.0 — capture-profile fields.
+  const [firstName, setFirstName] = useState('')
+  const [lastName, setLastName] = useState('')
+  const [reason, setReason] = useState('')
   const [status, setStatus] = useState('')
   const [busy, setBusy] = useState(false)
+  // v0.12.0: Turnstile token captured by the widget. `null` means no
+  // challenge solved yet (or the site key is unset, in which case the
+  // widget surfaces null on mount). The token is single-use; we clear
+  // it back to null right after we send it so a second request on the
+  // same form remount re-challenges. `turnstileReady` is true once the
+  // widget has produced a token OR the widget is not configured at
+  // build time (no site key) — the submit button reads from it so the
+  // form locks up when the operator has wired Turnstile but the user
+  // hasn't solved the challenge yet.
+  const [turnstileToken, setTurnstileToken] = useState(null)
+  const turnstileOn = turnstileEnabled()
+  const turnstileReady = !turnstileOn || !!turnstileToken
   const emailRef = useRef(null)
   const codeRef = useRef(null)
+  const passcodeRef = useRef(null)
+  const newPasscodeRef = useRef(null)
+  const firstNameRef = useRef(null)
   const navigate = useNavigate()
 
   useEffect(() => {
     if (step === 'email') emailRef.current?.focus()
-    else codeRef.current?.focus()
+    else if (step === 'code') codeRef.current?.focus()
+    else if (step === 'passcode') passcodeRef.current?.focus()
+    else if (step === 'capture-profile') firstNameRef.current?.focus()
+    else if (step === 'set-passcode') newPasscodeRef.current?.focus()
   }, [step])
 
+  // v0.11.0 — on mount, try the device-trust cookie path. If the
+  // browser still carries a valid `rfc_device_trust` cookie from a
+  // prior "trust this device" gesture, the server re-establishes the
+  // session without any user input and we redirect home. The cookie
+  // is HttpOnly so we can't peek at it; we just call the endpoint and
+  // see whether it returns 200. 401 (no cookie / invalid / revoked)
+  // is the structural-silent case — the user proceeds to the email
+  // step normally. We do not surface any UI about the attempt; a
+  // failure should be invisible.
+  useEffect(() => {
+    let cancelled = false
+    ;(async () => {
+      try {
+        await startDeviceTrust()
+        if (!cancelled) {
+          // v0.15.0 — analytics: device-trust cookie path is one of
+          // three sign-in methods the taxonomy distinguishes.
+          track(EVENTS.USER_SIGNED_IN, { method: 'trust-device' })
+          window.location.assign('/')
+        }
+      } catch (_) {
+        // No trusted device — fall through to the email step.
+      }
+    })()
+    return () => { cancelled = true }
+  }, [])
+
   async function submitEmail(e) {
     e.preventDefault()
     if (!email.trim() || !email.includes('@')) {
@@ -47,20 +173,97 @@ export default function Login() {
     setBusy(true)
     setStatus('')
     try {
-      await requestOtc(email.trim())
-      setStep('code')
-      setStatus('Check your inbox — a six-digit code is on the way.')
+      const { has_passcode } = await checkPasscode(email.trim())
+      if (has_passcode) {
+        setStep('passcode')
+        setStatus('')
+      } else {
+        await requestOtc(email.trim(), { turnstileToken })
+        // v0.12.0: the token is single-use; drop it so a re-request
+        // from the code step (via "Use a different email" → back to
+        // email) starts with a fresh challenge.
+        setTurnstileToken(null)
+        setStep('code')
+        setStatus('Check your inbox — a six-digit code is on the way.')
+      }
     } catch (err) {
+      // Any failure consumes the token from CloudFlare's side; clear
+      // so the widget re-renders a fresh challenge on retry.
+      setTurnstileToken(null)
       if (err.status === 429) {
         setStatus('Slow down — wait a minute before requesting another code.')
+      } else if (err.status === 400) {
+        setStatus("Couldn't verify you're human. Please retry the challenge.")
       } else {
-        setStatus(err.message || 'Could not request a code. Try again.')
+        setStatus(err.message || 'Could not start sign-in. Try again.')
       }
     } finally {
       setBusy(false)
     }
   }
 
+  async function submitPasscode(e) {
+    if (e) e.preventDefault()
+    if (!passcode.trim()) {
+      setStatus('Enter your passcode.')
+      return
+    }
+    setBusy(true)
+    setStatus('')
+    try {
+      await verifyPasscode(email.trim(), passcode.trim(), { trustDevice })
+      // v0.15.0 — analytics: passcode is the second of three
+      // sign-in methods. trust-device gets credited separately when
+      // the cookie-driven path fires above.
+      track(EVENTS.USER_SIGNED_IN, { method: 'passcode' })
+      // Reload so App.jsx's getMe() picks up the fresh session. A
+      // returning passcode user is by definition already past the
+      // §6.1 capture step (they couldn't have set a passcode while
+      // pending), so we go straight to "/".
+      window.location.assign('/')
+    } catch (err) {
+      if (err.status === 423) {
+        // Lockout — auto-fall back to OTC. The OTC request endpoint
+        // is independent of the passcode lockout, so this lands a
+        // fresh code in the user's inbox immediately.
+        setPasscode('')
+        try {
+          // v0.12.0: pass whatever token the widget on the passcode
+          // step has produced. If the operator has Turnstile required
+          // and the user hasn't solved the passcode-step widget, the
+          // backend refuses and we bounce them back to email-entry
+          // with a clear status (see catch below).
+          await requestOtc(email.trim(), { turnstileToken })
+          setTurnstileToken(null)
+          setStep('code')
+          setStatus(
+            'Too many failed attempts. We sent a one-time code to your email — use it to sign in.',
+          )
+        } catch (e2) {
+          setTurnstileToken(null)
+          if (e2.status === 429) {
+            setStep('code')
+            setStatus(
+              'Too many failed attempts. Wait a minute, then request a one-time code to sign in.',
+            )
+          } else if (e2.status === 400) {
+            setStep('email')
+            setStatus(
+              'Too many failed attempts. Solve the challenge below to receive a one-time code.',
+            )
+          } else {
+            setStatus(
+              'Too many failed attempts. Use the "Use a code instead" link to sign in via email.',
+            )
+          }
+        }
+      } else {
+        setStatus('Wrong passcode. Try again, or use a one-time code instead.')
+      }
+      setBusy(false)
+    }
+  }
+
   async function submitCode(e) {
     if (e) e.preventDefault()
     if (!code.trim() || code.trim().length !== 6) {
@@ -70,10 +273,44 @@ export default function Login() {
     setBusy(true)
     setStatus('')
     try {
-      await verifyOtc(email.trim(), code.trim())
-      // Reload so App.jsx's getMe() picks up the fresh session. We
-      // navigate to "/" via a hard load so any cached "anonymous"
-      // view state in memory is dropped cleanly.
+      await verifyOtc(email.trim(), code.trim(), { trustDevice })
+      // v0.15.0 — analytics: OTC is the third sign-in method.
+      // We fire it here regardless of whether the user then lands
+      // in capture-profile or offer-passcode — sign-in has happened
+      // server-side either way.
+      track(EVENTS.USER_SIGNED_IN, { method: 'otc' })
+      // OTC verified — the server has signed in the user. Fetch the
+      // canonical /api/auth/me to decide where to land:
+      //   * needs_profile  → §6.1 capture (then /beta-pending).
+      //   * no passcode    → §6.2 offer-passcode (then /).
+      //   * otherwise      → /.
+      // needs_profile wins over has_passcode: a pending user can't yet
+      // do anything that benefits from faster sign-in, so we don't
+      // distract them with the passcode offer mid-admission.
+      const meResp = await fetch('/api/auth/me', { credentials: 'include' })
+      let me = null
+      if (meResp.ok) {
+        try {
+          me = await meResp.json()
+        } catch (_) {
+          me = null
+        }
+      }
+      if (me?.needs_profile === true) {
+        setStep('capture-profile')
+        setStatus('')
+        setBusy(false)
+        return
+      }
+      if (me?.has_passcode === false) {
+        setStep('offer-passcode')
+        setStatus('')
+        setBusy(false)
+        return
+      }
+      // Either /me returned the granted-with-passcode shape, or the
+      // call failed but the session cookie is set — fall through to
+      // a hard reload so App.jsx re-fetches and renders accordingly.
       window.location.assign('/')
     } catch (err) {
       setStatus('That code is invalid or expired. Try again, or request a new code.')
@@ -81,6 +318,59 @@ export default function Login() {
     }
   }
 
+  async function submitProfile(e) {
+    if (e) e.preventDefault()
+    const fn = firstName.trim()
+    const ln = lastName.trim()
+    const why = reason.trim()
+    if (!fn || !ln || !why) {
+      setStatus('All three fields are required.')
+      return
+    }
+    setBusy(true)
+    setStatus('')
+    try {
+      await submitBetaRequest({
+        first_name: fn,
+        last_name: ln,
+        beta_request_reason: why,
+      })
+      // v0.15.0 — analytics: a successful capture-profile submit is
+      // the moment a beta-access request lands. No PII in the event
+      // body (no name, no reason text); the count + timestamp is
+      // what the funnel needs.
+      track(EVENTS.BETA_ACCESS_REQUESTED)
+      // Hard-load so App.jsx re-fetches /api/auth/me and picks up
+      // the captured fields. The user stays permission_state='pending'
+      // until an admin grants access — the next thing they should
+      // see is the "your request is in review" page.
+      window.location.assign('/beta-pending')
+    } catch (err) {
+      setStatus(err.message || 'Could not submit your request. Try again.')
+      setBusy(false)
+    }
+  }
+
+  async function submitNewPasscode(e) {
+    if (e) e.preventDefault()
+    const pc = newPasscode.trim()
+    if (pc.length < 4) {
+      setStatus('Passcode must be at least 4 characters.')
+      return
+    }
+    setBusy(true)
+    setStatus('')
+    try {
+      await apiSetPasscode(pc)
+      window.location.assign('/')
+    } catch (err) {
+      // 422 carries the validation message verbatim (denylist /
+      // length); surface it as-is so the user knows what to change.
+      setStatus(err.message || 'Could not set passcode. Try a different one.')
+      setBusy(false)
+    }
+  }
+
   function onCodeKey(e) {
     // §6.2 ergonomic: Cmd/Ctrl+Enter submits from the code field.
     if ((e.metaKey || e.ctrlKey) && e.key === 'Enter') {
@@ -88,12 +378,69 @@ export default function Login() {
     }
   }
 
+  function onPasscodeKey(e) {
+    if ((e.metaKey || e.ctrlKey) && e.key === 'Enter') {
+      submitPasscode(e)
+    }
+  }
+
+  function onReasonKey(e) {
+    // §6.1 ergonomic: Cmd/Ctrl+Enter submits the capture form from
+    // the reason textarea (the multi-line input that would otherwise
+    // swallow Enter as a newline).
+    if ((e.metaKey || e.ctrlKey) && e.key === 'Enter') {
+      submitProfile(e)
+    }
+  }
+
+  function onNewPasscodeKey(e) {
+    if ((e.metaKey || e.ctrlKey) && e.key === 'Enter') {
+      submitNewPasscode(e)
+    }
+  }
+
   function backToEmail() {
     setStep('email')
     setCode('')
+    setPasscode('')
     setStatus('')
   }
 
+  async function fallbackToOtc() {
+    // Manual "Use a code instead" from the passcode step. Same shape
+    // as the email-step OTC dispatch. v0.12.0: pass through whatever
+    // Turnstile token the passcode-step widget has produced (or null
+    // when the widget is disabled at build time).
+    setBusy(true)
+    setStatus('')
+    try {
+      await requestOtc(email.trim(), { turnstileToken })
+      setTurnstileToken(null)
+      setPasscode('')
+      setStep('code')
+      setStatus('Check your inbox — a six-digit code is on the way.')
+    } catch (err) {
+      setTurnstileToken(null)
+      if (err.status === 429) {
+        setStatus('Slow down — wait a minute before requesting another code.')
+      } else if (err.status === 400) {
+        // v0.12.0: the widget rejected or no token was sent. Bounce
+        // the user back to the email step so they get a fresh
+        // challenge alongside the email input.
+        setStep('email')
+        setStatus("Couldn't verify you're human. Please retry the challenge.")
+      } else {
+        setStatus(err.message || 'Could not request a code. Try again.')
+      }
+    } finally {
+      setBusy(false)
+    }
+  }
+
+  function skipPasscodeOffer() {
+    window.location.assign('/')
+  }
+
   return (
     <div className="otc-login">
       <div className="otc-login-inner">
@@ -101,7 +448,8 @@ export default function Login() {
         {step === 'email' && (
           <form onSubmit={submitEmail}>
             <p className="otc-hint">
-              Enter your email. We'll send you a one-time code.
+              Enter your email. If you've set a passcode, you'll enter that
+              next; otherwise we'll send a one-time code.
             </p>
             <input
               ref={emailRef}
@@ -113,11 +461,85 @@ export default function Login() {
               required
               disabled={busy}
             />
-            <button type="submit" disabled={busy || !email.trim()}>
-              {busy ? 'Sending…' : 'Send code'}
+            {/*
+              v0.12.0: CloudFlare Turnstile widget. Renders nothing
+              when VITE_TURNSTILE_SITE_KEY is unset (and turnstileReady
+              defaults to true in that case so the submit gate doesn't
+              lock up). On every challenge the widget calls onToken
+              with the fresh token; we feed it to /auth/otc/request.
+            */}
+            <TurnstileWidget onToken={setTurnstileToken} />
+            <button
+              type="submit"
+              disabled={busy || !email.trim() || !turnstileReady}
+            >
+              {busy ? 'Checking…' : 'Continue'}
             </button>
           </form>
         )}
+        {step === 'passcode' && (
+          <form onSubmit={submitPasscode}>
+            <p className="otc-hint">
+              Enter the passcode for <strong>{email}</strong>.
+            </p>
+            <input
+              ref={passcodeRef}
+              type="password"
+              autoComplete="current-password"
+              value={passcode}
+              onChange={e => setPasscode(e.target.value)}
+              onKeyDown={onPasscodeKey}
+              placeholder="Your passcode"
+              required
+              disabled={busy}
+            />
+            {/* v0.11.0 — trust device for 30 days. The checkbox lives
+                on the verify step so the user makes the trust gesture
+                in the same breath as signing in. Off by default; the
+                user opts in deliberately. */}
+            <label className="otc-trust-device">
+              <input
+                type="checkbox"
+                checked={trustDevice}
+                onChange={e => setTrustDevice(e.target.checked)}
+                disabled={busy}
+              />
+              <span>Trust this device for 30 days</span>
+            </label>
+            {/*
+              v0.12.0: a second Turnstile widget for the
+              "Use a code instead" fallback dispatch. The passcode
+              verify path does not consume a Turnstile token (it has
+              its own 5-attempt lockout shape from v0.10.0), but if
+              the user falls back to OTC the same /auth/otc/request
+              endpoint runs and needs a token. We render the widget
+              on this step too so the fallback works without bouncing
+              back to email-entry first.
+            */}
+            <TurnstileWidget onToken={setTurnstileToken} />
+            <div className="otc-actions">
+              <button type="submit" disabled={busy || !passcode.trim()}>
+                {busy ? 'Signing in…' : 'Sign in'}
+              </button>
+              <button
+                type="button"
+                className="btn-link-quiet"
+                onClick={fallbackToOtc}
+                disabled={busy || !turnstileReady}
+              >
+                Use a code instead
+              </button>
+              <button
+                type="button"
+                className="btn-link-quiet"
+                onClick={backToEmail}
+                disabled={busy}
+              >
+                Use a different email
+              </button>
+            </div>
+          </form>
+        )}
         {step === 'code' && (
           <form onSubmit={submitCode}>
             <p className="otc-hint">
@@ -137,6 +559,17 @@ export default function Login() {
               required
               disabled={busy}
             />
+            {/* v0.11.0 — trust device for 30 days. Same shape as the
+                passcode step; the user opts in deliberately. */}
+            <label className="otc-trust-device">
+              <input
+                type="checkbox"
+                checked={trustDevice}
+                onChange={e => setTrustDevice(e.target.checked)}
+                disabled={busy}
+              />
+              <span>Trust this device for 30 days</span>
+            </label>
             <div className="otc-actions">
               <button type="submit" disabled={busy || code.length !== 6}>
                 {busy ? 'Signing in…' : 'Sign in'}
@@ -155,12 +588,126 @@ export default function Login() {
             </p>
           </form>
         )}
+        {step === 'capture-profile' && (
+          <form onSubmit={submitProfile}>
+            <p className="otc-hint">
+              You're signed in. {import.meta.env.VITE_APP_NAME} is in private
+              beta — tell us a bit about yourself and an admin will review
+              your request.
+            </p>
+            <label className="otc-field-label">First name</label>
+            <input
+              ref={firstNameRef}
+              type="text"
+              autoComplete="given-name"
+              value={firstName}
+              onChange={e => setFirstName(e.target.value)}
+              required
+              disabled={busy}
+              maxLength={120}
+            />
+            <label className="otc-field-label">Last name</label>
+            <input
+              type="text"
+              autoComplete="family-name"
+              value={lastName}
+              onChange={e => setLastName(e.target.value)}
+              required
+              disabled={busy}
+              maxLength={120}
+            />
+            <label className="otc-field-label">
+              Why you'd like to be included in the beta
+            </label>
+            <textarea
+              value={reason}
+              onChange={e => setReason(e.target.value)}
+              onKeyDown={onReasonKey}
+              required
+              disabled={busy}
+              rows={5}
+              maxLength={4000}
+              placeholder="A sentence or two is plenty."
+            />
+            <div className="otc-actions">
+              <button
+                type="submit"
+                disabled={busy || !firstName.trim() || !lastName.trim() || !reason.trim()}
+              >
+                {busy ? 'Submitting…' : 'Submit request'}
+              </button>
+            </div>
+            <p className="otc-shortcut-hint">
+              Tip: <kbd>⌘</kbd>+<kbd>Enter</kbd> (or <kbd>Ctrl</kbd>+<kbd>Enter</kbd>) to submit.
+            </p>
+          </form>
+        )}
+        {step === 'offer-passcode' && (
+          <div className="otc-offer-passcode">
+            <p className="otc-hint">
+              You're signed in. Want to set a passcode for faster sign-in
+              next time? You can always use a one-time code instead — and
+              you can change or remove the passcode from your settings.
+            </p>
+            <div className="otc-actions">
+              <button
+                type="button"
+                onClick={() => { setStep('set-passcode'); setStatus('') }}
+              >
+                Set a passcode
+              </button>
+              <button
+                type="button"
+                className="btn-link-quiet"
+                onClick={skipPasscodeOffer}
+              >
+                Skip for now
+              </button>
+            </div>
+          </div>
+        )}
+        {step === 'set-passcode' && (
+          <form onSubmit={submitNewPasscode}>
+            <p className="otc-hint">
+              Pick a passcode (4–20 characters). You'll use it with your
+              email to sign in next time.
+            </p>
+            <input
+              ref={newPasscodeRef}
+              type="password"
+              autoComplete="new-password"
+              value={newPasscode}
+              onChange={e => setNewPasscode(e.target.value)}
+              onKeyDown={onNewPasscodeKey}
+              placeholder="New passcode"
+              required
+              disabled={busy}
+              minLength={4}
+              maxLength={20}
+            />
+            <div className="otc-actions">
+              <button type="submit" disabled={busy || newPasscode.trim().length < 4}>
+                {busy ? 'Saving…' : 'Save passcode'}
+              </button>
+              <button
+                type="button"
+                className="btn-link-quiet"
+                onClick={skipPasscodeOffer}
+                disabled={busy}
+              >
+                Skip for now
+              </button>
+            </div>
+          </form>
+        )}
         {status && <p className="otc-status">{status}</p>}
-        <p className="otc-fallback">
-          <Link to="/philosophy">Read the philosophy →</Link>
-          <span className="otc-fallback-sep">·</span>
-          <a href="/auth/login">Sign in with Gitea (fallback)</a>
-        </p>
+        {step !== 'capture-profile' && (
+          <p className="otc-fallback">
+            <Link to="/philosophy">Read the philosophy →</Link>
+            <span className="otc-fallback-sep">·</span>
+            <a href="/auth/login">Sign in with Gitea (fallback)</a>
+          </p>
+        )}
       </div>
     </div>
   )

frontend/src/components/NotificationSettings.jsx

@@ -29,6 +29,12 @@ import {
   muteUser,
   searchUsers,
   getCookieConsent,
+  getMe,
+  setPasscode,
+  clearPasscode,
+  listMyDevices,
+  revokeMyDevice,
+  revokeAllMyDevices,
 } from '../api.js'
 import { getConsent, onConsentChange, hydrateFromServer } from '../lib/consent.js'
 
@@ -50,11 +56,282 @@ export default function NotificationSettings({ viewer }) {
       <QuietHoursSection />
       <WatchesSection />
       <MutesSection viewer={viewer} />
+      <SignInSection />
+      <DevicesSection />
       <PrivacyCookiesSection />
     </div>
   )
 }
 
+// ── v0.11.0: trusted devices (§6.2, roadmap item #9) ──────────────────────
+//
+// Lists the user's active device-trust rows and lets them revoke any
+// or all. A revoke marks the row dead server-side; the matching
+// device's next visit will be refused and the cookie cleared. The
+// surface intentionally does not single out the row whose cookie the
+// current request carries — every row reads identically, so the user
+// can revoke "this device" alongside any other from a single page.
+
+function DevicesSection() {
+  const [devices, setDevices] = useState(null)
+  const [error, setError] = useState(null)
+  const [busy, setBusy] = useState(false)
+
+  useEffect(() => {
+    refresh()
+  }, [])
+
+  async function refresh() {
+    try {
+      const { items } = await listMyDevices()
+      setDevices(items || [])
+      setError(null)
+    } catch (e) {
+      setError(e.message || 'Could not load trusted devices.')
+    }
+  }
+
+  async function onRevoke(deviceId) {
+    setBusy(true)
+    try {
+      await revokeMyDevice(deviceId)
+      await refresh()
+    } catch (e) {
+      setError(e.message || 'Could not revoke device.')
+    } finally {
+      setBusy(false)
+    }
+  }
+
+  async function onRevokeAll() {
+    if (!confirm('Revoke trust on every device, including this one? You will be asked to sign in via email next time.')) {
+      return
+    }
+    setBusy(true)
+    try {
+      await revokeAllMyDevices()
+      await refresh()
+    } catch (e) {
+      setError(e.message || 'Could not revoke devices.')
+    } finally {
+      setBusy(false)
+    }
+  }
+
+  return (
+    <SectionShell
+      title="Trusted devices"
+      subtitle="Devices where you've checked “Trust this device for 30 days.” Sign-in is automatic on these devices until the trust expires or you revoke it."
+    >
+      {devices === null && <p className="settings-note">Loading…</p>}
+      {devices !== null && devices.length === 0 && (
+        <p className="device-empty">
+          No trusted devices. Sign in and check “Trust this device for 30 days”
+          to add the device you're on now.
+        </p>
+      )}
+      {devices !== null && devices.length > 0 && (
+        <>
+          <ul className="device-list">
+            {devices.map(d => (
+              <li key={d.id} className="device-list-item">
+                <div className="device-meta">
+                  <div className="device-ua">{d.user_agent || 'Unknown device'}</div>
+                  <div className="device-stamps">
+                    Trusted {formatStamp(d.created_at)} · last seen {formatStamp(d.last_seen_at)} · expires {formatStamp(d.expires_at)}
+                  </div>
+                </div>
+                <button
+                  type="button"
+                  onClick={() => onRevoke(d.id)}
+                  disabled={busy}
+                  title="Revoke trust on this device"
+                >
+                  Revoke
+                </button>
+              </li>
+            ))}
+          </ul>
+          <button
+            type="button"
+            className="device-revoke-all"
+            onClick={onRevokeAll}
+            disabled={busy}
+          >
+            Revoke all devices
+          </button>
+        </>
+      )}
+      {error && <p className="settings-note warning">{error}</p>}
+    </SectionShell>
+  )
+}
+
+function formatStamp(stamp) {
+  // The server emits SQLite `datetime('now')` strings (UTC, no
+  // timezone marker). Parse defensively; fall back to the raw stamp
+  // if Date can't make sense of it.
+  if (!stamp) return '—'
+  const d = new Date(stamp.replace(' ', 'T') + 'Z')
+  if (Number.isNaN(d.getTime())) return stamp
+  return d.toLocaleString()
+}
+
+// ── §6.2 sign-in (v0.10.0 / roadmap item #8): passcode management ──────────
+
+function SignInSection() {
+  // Source of truth for `has_passcode` and `passcode_set_at` is the
+  // /api/auth/me payload (v0.10.0 added both fields). We re-read after
+  // every mutation so the surface reflects what just landed.
+  const [me, setMe] = useState(null)
+  const [error, setError] = useState(null)
+  const [mode, setMode] = useState('idle') // 'idle' | 'set' | 'change'
+  const [draft, setDraft] = useState('')
+  const [busy, setBusy] = useState(false)
+  const [savedNote, setSavedNote] = useState('')
+
+  useEffect(() => {
+    getMe()
+      .then(payload => setMe(payload.user || null))
+      .catch(e => setError(e.message))
+  }, [])
+
+  async function refresh() {
+    const payload = await getMe()
+    setMe(payload.user || null)
+  }
+
+  async function save(e) {
+    if (e) e.preventDefault()
+    const pc = draft.trim()
+    if (pc.length < 4) {
+      setError('Passcode must be at least 4 characters.')
+      return
+    }
+    setBusy(true)
+    setError(null)
+    setSavedNote('')
+    try {
+      await setPasscode(pc)
+      setDraft('')
+      setMode('idle')
+      setSavedNote('Passcode saved.')
+      await refresh()
+    } catch (err) {
+      // 422 carries the validation message verbatim (denylist /
+      // length); surface it as-is so the user knows what to change.
+      setError(err.message || 'Could not save passcode. Try a different one.')
+    } finally {
+      setBusy(false)
+      setTimeout(() => setSavedNote(''), 2000)
+    }
+  }
+
+  async function remove() {
+    if (!confirm('Remove your passcode? You will sign in with a one-time code next time.')) {
+      return
+    }
+    setBusy(true)
+    setError(null)
+    setSavedNote('')
+    try {
+      await clearPasscode()
+      setSavedNote('Passcode removed.')
+      await refresh()
+    } catch (err) {
+      setError(err.message || 'Could not remove passcode.')
+    } finally {
+      setBusy(false)
+      setTimeout(() => setSavedNote(''), 2000)
+    }
+  }
+
+  if (!me) return <SectionShell title="Sign-in" subtitle={error || 'Loading…'} />
+
+  const hasPasscode = !!me.has_passcode
+
+  return (
+    <SectionShell
+      title="Sign-in"
+      subtitle="How you sign in. A passcode lets you skip the one-time-code email; the one-time-code path is always available as a fallback (and as the recovery path if you forget your passcode)."
+    >
+      <div className="settings-row">
+        <span className="settings-note">
+          <strong>Passcode:</strong>{' '}
+          {hasPasscode ? 'Set.' : 'Not set — you sign in with a one-time code each time.'}
+        </span>
+      </div>
+      {hasPasscode && me.passcode_set_at && (
+        <p className="settings-note muted">Set on {me.passcode_set_at}.</p>
+      )}
+
+      {mode === 'idle' && (
+        <div className="settings-row">
+          {hasPasscode ? (
+            <>
+              <button
+                className="btn-primary"
+                onClick={() => { setMode('change'); setDraft(''); setError(null) }}
+                disabled={busy}
+              >
+                Change passcode
+              </button>
+              <button
+                className="btn-link-muted"
+                onClick={remove}
+                disabled={busy}
+              >
+                Remove passcode
+              </button>
+            </>
+          ) : (
+            <button
+              className="btn-primary"
+              onClick={() => { setMode('set'); setDraft(''); setError(null) }}
+              disabled={busy}
+            >
+              Set passcode
+            </button>
+          )}
+        </div>
+      )}
+
+      {(mode === 'set' || mode === 'change') && (
+        <form className="settings-row" onSubmit={save}>
+          <label>
+            {mode === 'change' ? 'New passcode' : 'Passcode'}
+            <input
+              type="password"
+              autoComplete="new-password"
+              value={draft}
+              onChange={e => setDraft(e.target.value)}
+              placeholder="4–20 characters"
+              minLength={4}
+              maxLength={20}
+              required
+              disabled={busy}
+            />
+          </label>
+          <button className="btn-primary" type="submit" disabled={busy || draft.trim().length < 4}>
+            {busy ? 'Saving…' : 'Save'}
+          </button>
+          <button
+            type="button"
+            className="btn-link-muted"
+            onClick={() => { setMode('idle'); setDraft(''); setError(null) }}
+            disabled={busy}
+          >
+            Cancel
+          </button>
+        </form>
+      )}
+
+      {savedNote && <p className="settings-note">{savedNote}</p>}
+      {error && <p className="settings-note warning">{error}</p>}
+    </SectionShell>
+  )
+}
+
 // ── §14.5 cookie / privacy consent (v0.13.0 / roadmap item #11) ────────────
 
 function PrivacyCookiesSection() {

frontend/src/components/PRModal.jsx

@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
 
 import { useEffect, useState } from 'react'
 import { draftPRText, openPR } from '../api'
+import { EVENTS, track } from '../lib/analytics'
 
 export default function PRModal({ slug, branch, branchIsPrivate, onClose, onOpened }) {
   const [title, setTitle] = useState('')
@@ -39,6 +40,9 @@ export default function PRModal({ slug, branch, branchIsPrivate, onClose, onOpen
     setError(null)
     try {
       const { pr_number } = await openPR(slug, branch, { title: title.trim(), description: description.trim() })
+      // v0.15.0 — analytics: fire on §10.2 PR-open success. slug
+      // and pr_number are the join keys; title/description stay out.
+      track(EVENTS.PR_OPENED, { rfc_slug: slug, pr_number })
       onOpened?.(pr_number)
     } catch (e) {
       setError(e.message)

frontend/src/components/PRView.jsx

@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ import {
   startResolutionBranch,
   withdrawPR,
 } from '../api'
+import { EVENTS, track } from '../lib/analytics'
 
 export default function PRView({ viewer }) {
   const { slug, prNumber: prNumberParam } = useParams()
@@ -135,6 +136,10 @@ export default function PRView({ viewer }) {
         anchorPayload: reviewDraft?.anchorPayload || {},
         quote: reviewDraft?.quote || null,
       })
+      // v0.15.0 — analytics: fire on §10.4 review-comment success.
+      // surface=pr distinguishes this from RFC discussion comments.
+      // No body text or quote material in the event.
+      track(EVENTS.COMMENT_POSTED, { rfc_slug: slug, pr_number: prNumber, surface: 'pr' })
       setReviewText('')
       setReviewDraft(null)
       await refresh()

frontend/src/components/ProposeModal.jsx

@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
 
 import { useEffect, useState } from 'react'
 import { proposeRFC } from '../api'
+import { EVENTS, track } from '../lib/analytics'
 
 function slugify(title) {
   return title
@@ -52,6 +53,10 @@ export default function ProposeModal({ viewer, onClose, onSubmitted }) {
         pitch: pitch.trim(),
         tags,
       })
+      // v0.15.0 — analytics: fire on the §9.1 propose-RFC submit.
+      // Slug is a stable, low-cardinality identifier (kebab-case
+      // ascii); title and pitch stay out of the event body.
+      track(EVENTS.RFC_PROPOSED, { rfc_slug: slug })
       onSubmitted?.(result)
     } catch (err) {
       setError(err.message || 'Submission failed.')

frontend/src/components/RFCDiscussionPanel.jsx

@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ import {
   postDiscussionMessage,
   resolveDiscussionThread,
 } from '../api'
+import { EVENTS, track } from '../lib/analytics'
 
 export default function RFCDiscussionPanel({ slug, viewer }) {
   const [threads, setThreads] = useState([])
@@ -100,6 +101,10 @@ export default function RFCDiscussionPanel({ slug, viewer }) {
         void message_id
       }
       setComposer('')
+      // v0.15.0 — analytics: fire on a successful discussion post.
+      // surface=discussion distinguishes this from PR review comments
+      // which fire from PRView with surface=pr. No body text.
+      track(EVENTS.COMMENT_POSTED, { rfc_slug: slug, surface: 'discussion' })
     } catch (err) {
       setError(err.message)
     } finally {

frontend/src/components/RFCView.jsx

@@ -43,7 +43,9 @@ import RFCDiscussionPanel from './RFCDiscussionPanel.jsx'
 import ChangePanel, { diffWords } from './ChangePanel.jsx'
 import PRModal from './PRModal.jsx'
 import GraduateDialog from './GraduateDialog.jsx'
+import InvitationsModal from './InvitationsModal.jsx'
 import { claimOwnership } from '../api'
+import { EVENTS, track } from '../lib/analytics'
 
 const MANUAL_IDLE_MS = 5 * 60 * 1000   // §8.6 idle window; exact value is impl detail.
 const MANUAL_DEBOUNCE_MS = 800
@@ -121,7 +123,15 @@ export default function RFCView({ viewer }) {
   const [drawerOpen, setDrawerOpen] = useState(false)
 
   useEffect(() => {
-    getRFC(slug).then(setEntry).catch(err => setError(err.message))
+    getRFC(slug).then(entry => {
+      setEntry(entry)
+      // v0.15.0 — analytics: fire RFC Viewed once per slug load.
+      // We key on the slug param rather than the loaded entry so a
+      // re-render doesn't double-fire; the slug is the stable
+      // identifier. id is included for join-friendliness in the
+      // Amplitude dashboard.
+      track(EVENTS.RFC_VIEWED, { rfc_slug: slug, rfc_id: entry?.id })
+    }).catch(err => setError(err.message))
     listModels(slug)
       .then(({ models, default: def }) => {
         setModels(models || [])
@@ -139,6 +149,11 @@ export default function RFCView({ viewer }) {
   const [showMetadataPane, setShowMetadataPane] = useState(false)
   const [showGraduateDialog, setShowGraduateDialog] = useState(false)
   const [claimError, setClaimError] = useState(null)
+  // v0.16.0 (item #12): the per-RFC invitations modal. Visible only to
+  // RFC owners (frontmatter) and platform admin/owner — the backend
+  // gates the underlying endpoints regardless, so a leaked toggle
+  // can't actually leak anything.
+  const [showInvitationsModal, setShowInvitationsModal] = useState(false)
 
   // Load main view + branch view whenever slug/branch changes.
   useEffect(() => {
@@ -624,6 +639,20 @@ export default function RFCView({ viewer }) {
               Graduate to RFC repo
             </button>
           )}
+          {/* v0.16.0 (item #12): owner-only invitations affordance.
+              Shown when the viewer is named in the RFC's frontmatter
+              `owners` list or holds a platform admin/owner role.
+              Available on both super-drafts and active RFCs. */}
+          {viewer && (viewer.role === 'owner' || viewer.role === 'admin' || (entry?.owners || []).includes(viewer.gitea_login)) && (
+            <button
+              type="button"
+              className="btn-link"
+              onClick={() => setShowInvitationsModal(true)}
+              title="Invite collaborators to this RFC"
+            >
+              Invitations
+            </button>
+          )}
         </div>
       </div>
       {claimError && (
@@ -856,6 +885,14 @@ export default function RFCView({ viewer }) {
         />
       )}
 
+      {showInvitationsModal && (
+        <InvitationsModal
+          slug={slug}
+          rfcTitle={entry?.title}
+          onClose={() => setShowInvitationsModal(false)}
+        />
+      )}
+
       {showMetadataPane && (
         <MetadataPaneModal
           slug={slug}

frontend/src/components/TurnstileWidget.jsx

@@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
+// TurnstileWidget.jsx — v0.12.0 / roadmap item #10.
+//
+// Renders the CloudFlare Turnstile JS widget on the email-entry step of
+// `/login`. Reads the site key from `import.meta.env.VITE_TURNSTILE_SITE_KEY`
+// (Vite convention — VITE_* prefix is build-time embedded). When the
+// site key is unset/empty, this component renders nothing and reports
+// a `null` token through `onToken` so the parent form can still submit.
+// The backend's `TURNSTILE_REQUIRED` policy decides what happens to a
+// request that arrives without a token; the frontend is intentionally
+// not in that loop. See `backend/app/turnstile.py` for the matrix.
+//
+// The CloudFlare script is loaded once per page on first widget mount.
+// Subsequent mounts (e.g. user goes back to email-entry after a failed
+// OTC request) reuse the script tag and re-render the widget on the
+// fresh container `div`. Unmounting removes the widget instance via
+// `turnstile.remove(widgetId)` so a remount produces a new challenge
+// rather than reusing a stale, already-consumed token.
+//
+// Turnstile contract:
+//   * `data-callback` fires with the token string on a successful
+//     challenge; the token is single-use and expires after ~5 minutes.
+//   * `data-error-callback` fires on a failed challenge (network,
+//     blocked, etc.); we surface a `null` token so the parent shows
+//     a retry hint.
+//   * `data-expired-callback` fires when the token times out before
+//     submission; we also drop to `null` and re-render so the user
+//     gets a fresh challenge on retry.
+//
+// We do **not** import the CloudFlare script at build time; loading it
+// dynamically here keeps the bundle clean of an external request the
+// page may not need (anonymous viewers reading RFCs never see Login).
+
+import { useEffect, useRef } from 'react'
+
+const TURNSTILE_SCRIPT_URL = 'https://challenges.cloudflare.com/turnstile/v0/api.js'
+const SITE_KEY = import.meta.env.VITE_TURNSTILE_SITE_KEY || ''
+
+// Promise-keyed: only one script tag, only one resolution chain.
+let scriptLoadPromise = null
+
+function loadTurnstileScript() {
+  if (typeof window === 'undefined') return Promise.resolve(null)
+  if (window.turnstile) return Promise.resolve(window.turnstile)
+  if (scriptLoadPromise) return scriptLoadPromise
+
+  scriptLoadPromise = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
+    const existing = document.querySelector(`script[src="${TURNSTILE_SCRIPT_URL}"]`)
+    if (existing) {
+      existing.addEventListener('load', () => resolve(window.turnstile))
+      existing.addEventListener('error', reject)
+      return
+    }
+    const script = document.createElement('script')
+    script.src = TURNSTILE_SCRIPT_URL
+    script.async = true
+    script.defer = true
+    script.addEventListener('load', () => resolve(window.turnstile))
+    script.addEventListener('error', reject)
+    document.head.appendChild(script)
+  })
+  return scriptLoadPromise
+}
+
+export function turnstileEnabled() {
+  return !!SITE_KEY
+}
+
+export default function TurnstileWidget({ onToken, theme = 'auto' }) {
+  const containerRef = useRef(null)
+  const widgetIdRef = useRef(null)
+
+  useEffect(() => {
+    if (!SITE_KEY) {
+      // No site key configured → surface a null token immediately so
+      // the parent form's submit-disabled gate doesn't lock up
+      // waiting on a challenge that will never arrive. The backend
+      // decides whether a tokenless request is admitted.
+      onToken?.(null)
+      return undefined
+    }
+
+    let cancelled = false
+    loadTurnstileScript()
+      .then(turnstile => {
+        if (cancelled || !turnstile || !containerRef.current) return
+        widgetIdRef.current = turnstile.render(containerRef.current, {
+          sitekey: SITE_KEY,
+          theme,
+          callback: token => onToken?.(token),
+          'error-callback': () => onToken?.(null),
+          'expired-callback': () => onToken?.(null),
+        })
+      })
+      .catch(() => {
+        // Script load failure — surface null so the parent can decide
+        // what to do (today: still let submit through; the backend
+        // policy decides admission).
+        if (!cancelled) onToken?.(null)
+      })
+
+    return () => {
+      cancelled = true
+      if (widgetIdRef.current && window.turnstile) {
+        try {
+          window.turnstile.remove(widgetIdRef.current)
+        } catch (_) {
+          // Already gone or never registered — nothing to clean up.
+        }
+        widgetIdRef.current = null
+      }
+    }
+    // We intentionally do not list `onToken` in the dependency array;
+    // a parent re-rendering with a fresh closure should not tear down
+    // and rebuild the widget (which would consume a fresh challenge).
+    // eslint-disable-next-line react-hooks/exhaustive-deps
+  }, [])
+
+  if (!SITE_KEY) return null
+  return <div ref={containerRef} className="turnstile-widget" />
+}

frontend/src/lib/analytics.js

@@ -0,0 +1,384 @@
+// analytics.js — v0.15.0 / roadmap item #13.
+//
+// Wrapper around `@amplitude/unified` (Amplitude Analytics +
+// Session Replay) that gates SDK initialization on the user's
+// cookie/privacy consent (v0.13.0, `frontend/src/lib/consent.js`,
+// SPEC §14.5). The wrapper presents a stable surface to the rest
+// of the app:
+//
+//     import { track, identify, anonymize } from './lib/analytics'
+//
+//     track('RFC Viewed', { rfc_slug: 'open-human-model' })
+//     identify({ user_id: 'u_123' })
+//     anonymize()  // call on sign-out
+//
+// At first import the wrapper:
+//   1. Calls `bootstrap()` once, which reads `getConsent()` and
+//      subscribes to `onConsentChange()`. If consent.analytics is
+//      true, it lazily imports the Amplitude SDK and calls
+//      `amplitude.initAll(API_KEY, { analytics: { autocapture: true },
+//                                     sessionReplay: { sampleRate: 1 } })`.
+//      If consent.analytics is false (or undecided), the SDK is
+//      not loaded — no network request, no cookies, no session
+//      replay recording. A later consent change to `true` triggers
+//      init at that moment.
+//   2. The wrapper queues `track()` and `identify()` calls made
+//      before init finishes (lazy import + consent grant), and
+//      drains the queue when init completes.
+//   3. If the user later flips consent from granted → denied, the
+//      wrapper calls `amplitude.setOptOut(true)` so subsequent
+//      events are dropped client-side and session replay stops
+//      recording (the SDK is still loaded — we cannot unload a
+//      script — but it stops firing).
+//
+// Consent precedence ladder:
+//
+//     consent.analytics === true   → init + track
+//     consent.analytics === false  → no init; or if already init,
+//                                    setOptOut(true)
+//     consent.recorded_at === null → treat as denied (banner is up;
+//                                    the user has not yet chosen)
+//
+// Session replay scope: this release ships session replay at
+// `sampleRate: 1` (100% of sessions are recorded for full-DOM
+// playback). That is the vendor-recommended default for new
+// Amplitude deployments. The v0.13.0 consent banner's single
+// "analytics" toggle gates both events and session replay together —
+// a separate consent category for session-replay specifically is a
+// §19.2 follow-up.
+//
+// API key resolution:
+//
+//     The build-time env var `VITE_AMPLITUDE_API_KEY` carries the
+//     Amplitude project's API key. When it is unset/empty, the
+//     wrapper logs one console warning and no-ops — every public
+//     function becomes a deterministic no-op so dev environments
+//     (and deployments that intentionally don't ship analytics)
+//     keep working. The deploy gesture wires the key via flotilla's
+//     `overlay set` verb (see CHANGELOG for the operator gesture):
+//     Amplitude browser keys are bundle-embedded by design (visible
+//     to anyone with dev tools, same nature as the v0.12.0
+//     `VITE_TURNSTILE_SITE_KEY`), so the binding is overlay, not
+//     secret.
+//
+// PII discipline:
+//
+//     `identify({ user_id })` SHOULD pass only the opaque server-
+//     side user id (the `viewer.id` integer or string). DO NOT pass
+//     email, display name, IP, or any other PII through the SDK.
+//     Event properties SHOULD likewise stay limited to ids and
+//     enums; free-text fields (titles, comment bodies) MUST NOT be
+//     sent.
+//
+// Event taxonomy: defined in `EVENTS` below. Callers SHOULD use
+// one of these names rather than firing arbitrary strings — that
+// keeps the Amplitude dashboard coherent over time.
+
+import { getConsent, onConsentChange } from './consent.js'
+
+const API_KEY = import.meta.env.VITE_AMPLITUDE_API_KEY || ''
+
+// Public taxonomy. Keep this short and stable — new entries should
+// land via a release, not ad-hoc. The strings match the Amplitude
+// dashboard names exactly (Title Case, spaces, no punctuation).
+export const EVENTS = Object.freeze({
+  PAGE_VIEWED: 'Page Viewed',
+  RFC_VIEWED: 'RFC Viewed',
+  USER_SIGNED_IN: 'User Signed In',
+  USER_SIGNED_OUT: 'User Signed Out',
+  RFC_PROPOSED: 'RFC Proposed',
+  PR_OPENED: 'PR Opened',
+  COMMENT_POSTED: 'Comment Posted',
+  BETA_ACCESS_REQUESTED: 'Beta Access Requested',
+  ADMIN_PERMISSION_DECISION: 'Admin Permission Decision',
+  // v0.16.0 / item #12 — per-RFC owner invites.
+  INVITATION_SENT: 'Invitation Sent',
+  INVITATION_ACCEPTED: 'Invitation Accepted',
+  // v0.17.0 / item #16 — admin-create user + invite email.
+  USER_INVITED: 'User Invited',
+  INVITE_CLAIMED: 'Invite Claimed',
+})
+
+// Internal state.
+let _bootstrapped = false
+let _amplitude = null       // The dynamically imported SDK module.
+let _initPromise = null     // Pending init (lazy import + sdk.init).
+let _initialized = false    // True after sdk.init has resolved.
+let _warnedNoKey = false
+let _pendingUserId = null   // identify() called before init resolves.
+let _pendingProperties = null  // identify({ properties }) or
+                               // setUserProperties() before init.
+const _queue = []           // {kind: 'track'|'identify'|'anonymize'|
+                            //  'setUserProperties', ...}
+
+function warnNoKey() {
+  if (_warnedNoKey) return
+  _warnedNoKey = true
+  // eslint-disable-next-line no-console
+  console.warn(
+    '[analytics] VITE_AMPLITUDE_API_KEY is unset; analytics events ' +
+    'and session replay will not be sent. This is expected in dev; ' +
+    'in production it means the operator has not yet run ' +
+    '`flotilla overlay set <deployment> VITE_AMPLITUDE_API_KEY=<key>`.',
+  )
+}
+
+function consentGranted() {
+  const c = getConsent()
+  return !!(c && c.recorded_at && c.analytics)
+}
+
+// Apply a {key: value} property bag as an Amplitude Identify event.
+// Used by both `identify({ properties })` and `setUserProperties`.
+function applyProperties(props) {
+  if (!_initialized || !_amplitude || !props) return
+  try {
+    const id = new _amplitude.Identify()
+    for (const [k, v] of Object.entries(props)) {
+      if (v === undefined || v === null) continue
+      if (Array.isArray(v) && v.length === 2 && v[0] === '__setOnce__') {
+        id.setOnce(k, v[1])
+      } else {
+        id.set(k, v)
+      }
+    }
+    _amplitude.identify(id)
+  } catch (_) {
+    // SDK errors are non-fatal; analytics is best-effort.
+  }
+}
+
+// Drain the queue. Called once init resolves.
+function drainQueue() {
+  if (!_initialized || !_amplitude) return
+  if (_pendingUserId != null) {
+    try { _amplitude.setUserId(_pendingUserId) } catch (_) {}
+    _pendingUserId = null
+  }
+  if (_pendingProperties != null) {
+    applyProperties(_pendingProperties)
+    _pendingProperties = null
+  }
+  while (_queue.length > 0) {
+    const item = _queue.shift()
+    try {
+      if (item.kind === 'track') {
+        _amplitude.track(item.name, item.props || {})
+      } else if (item.kind === 'identify') {
+        if (item.user_id != null) _amplitude.setUserId(item.user_id)
+        if (item.properties != null) applyProperties(item.properties)
+      } else if (item.kind === 'setUserProperties') {
+        applyProperties(item.properties)
+      } else if (item.kind === 'anonymize') {
+        _amplitude.reset()
+      }
+    } catch (_) {
+      // SDK errors are non-fatal; analytics is best-effort.
+    }
+  }
+}
+
+// Lazy import + init. Resolves once the SDK is ready to take events.
+// Idempotent: subsequent calls return the same promise.
+async function initSdk() {
+  if (_initPromise) return _initPromise
+  if (!API_KEY) {
+    warnNoKey()
+    // Resolve immediately with a no-op shape; the wrapper's public
+    // functions check API_KEY and short-circuit, so this never
+    // actually runs SDK code.
+    _initPromise = Promise.resolve(null)
+    return _initPromise
+  }
+  _initPromise = (async () => {
+    try {
+      const mod = await import('@amplitude/unified')
+      // The unified package exposes `initAll`, `track`,
+      // `setUserId`, `reset`, `setOptOut` as named functions.
+      // We hold the module so the queue drainer can call them
+      // by name.
+      _amplitude = mod
+      // initAll wires up both Analytics and Session Replay in one
+      // call. Vendor-recommended init shape from the Amplitude
+      // installation wizard:
+      //   - analytics.autocapture: true — auto-instruments page
+      //     views, session start/end, clicks, and form interactions.
+      //     Our explicit `track('Page Viewed', …)` etc. layer on top
+      //     for app-specific names that survive renames.
+      //   - sessionReplay.sampleRate: 1 — record 100% of sessions
+      //     for full-DOM playback. Gated by the v0.13.0 consent
+      //     banner just like the rest of the SDK; never starts
+      //     recording without explicit analytics opt-in.
+      const ret = mod.initAll(API_KEY, {
+        analytics: { autocapture: true },
+        sessionReplay: { sampleRate: 1 },
+      })
+      // initAll returns an AmplitudeReturn with a `.promise` accessor
+      // (consistent with the legacy `init`). Some unified builds
+      // resolve synchronously; await defensively.
+      if (ret && ret.promise) await ret.promise
+      _initialized = true
+      drainQueue()
+    } catch (err) {
+      // Init failure is non-fatal; keep the wrapper alive so future
+      // calls no-op. Log once for the operator.
+      // eslint-disable-next-line no-console
+      console.warn('[analytics] Amplitude init failed:', err)
+      _initialized = false
+    }
+    return _amplitude
+  })()
+  return _initPromise
+}
+
+// Bootstrap is called lazily on first track/identify. It wires the
+// consent subscription so a later flip from denied→granted triggers
+// init at that moment, and granted→denied flips the opt-out.
+function bootstrap() {
+  if (_bootstrapped) return
+  _bootstrapped = true
+  if (consentGranted()) {
+    // Fire-and-forget; the queue catches any events that arrive
+    // before init resolves.
+    initSdk()
+  }
+  onConsentChange(snapshot => {
+    const allowed = !!(snapshot && snapshot.recorded_at && snapshot.analytics)
+    if (allowed && !_initPromise) {
+      initSdk()
+    } else if (allowed && _initialized && _amplitude) {
+      // Re-enable in case we previously opted out.
+      try { _amplitude.setOptOut(false) } catch (_) {}
+    } else if (!allowed && _initialized && _amplitude) {
+      // Granted → denied. Stop firing. We cannot unload the script
+      // tag; setOptOut is the SDK's contract for "drop subsequent
+      // events client-side".
+      try { _amplitude.setOptOut(true) } catch (_) {}
+    }
+  })
+}
+
+/** Fire a track event. Safe to call before consent / init resolve;
+ *  the call is queued and drained once both are true. Drops the
+ *  event silently if API_KEY is empty (with a one-shot warn) or
+ *  consent.analytics is false. */
+export function track(name, props) {
+  if (!API_KEY) { warnNoKey(); return }
+  bootstrap()
+  if (!consentGranted()) return
+  if (_initialized && _amplitude) {
+    try { _amplitude.track(name, props || {}) } catch (_) {}
+    return
+  }
+  _queue.push({ kind: 'track', name, props })
+}
+
+/** Attach an authenticated user id and optional durable properties.
+ *  Pass `{ user_id: '<opaque-id>', properties?: { role, first_sign_in_at, … } }`.
+ *  DO NOT pass email, display name, or other PII as user_id or in
+ *  properties. Idempotent — subsequent calls with the same id are
+ *  cheap; properties are merged into the Amplitude user record.
+ *
+ *  To mark a property as setOnce (immutable after first write),
+ *  pass `properties: { first_sign_in_at: ['__setOnce__', '2026-05-28T…'] }`.
+ *  Bare values use Amplitude's `.set()` (mutable).
+ *
+ *  Pattern (per #21 Part C):
+ *    - On sign-in success in App.jsx: identify with viewer.id + the
+ *      durable property bag (role, permission_state, first_sign_in_at
+ *      setOnce, passcode_set, device_trusted_count, account_created_at
+ *      setOnce).
+ *    - On invite-claim success in InviteClaim.jsx / AcceptInvitation.jsx:
+ *      identify with the new viewer.id + invitation-derived properties
+ *      (invited_by_admin_id, invited_at setOnce, initial_role, claim_method)
+ *      BEFORE firing any track() — so the Amplitude user record is
+ *      created with the OHM user_id from the first event, not as an
+ *      anonymous device that retroactively links. */
+export function identify({ user_id, properties } = {}) {
+  if (!API_KEY) { warnNoKey(); return }
+  if (user_id == null && properties == null) return
+  bootstrap()
+  if (!consentGranted()) {
+    // Hold for when consent lands; identify-on-sign-in is a common
+    // race with the consent banner choice.
+    if (user_id != null) _pendingUserId = user_id
+    if (properties != null) {
+      _pendingProperties = { ..._pendingProperties, ...properties }
+    }
+    return
+  }
+  if (_initialized && _amplitude) {
+    try {
+      if (user_id != null) _amplitude.setUserId(user_id)
+      if (properties != null) applyProperties(properties)
+    } catch (_) {}
+    return
+  }
+  if (user_id != null) _pendingUserId = user_id
+  if (properties != null) {
+    _pendingProperties = { ..._pendingProperties, ...properties }
+  }
+  _queue.push({ kind: 'identify', user_id, properties })
+}
+
+/** Update durable user properties on the current Amplitude user
+ *  record mid-session — for state changes that shouldn't wait for the
+ *  next sign-in to surface (role grant/revoke, passcode set, device
+ *  trusted, etc.). Same property shape as `identify({ properties })`.
+ *  setOnce values use the `['__setOnce__', value]` sentinel pattern.
+ *  Has no effect if no identify has happened yet — set the user_id
+ *  via `identify()` first.
+ *
+ *  Per #21 Part C: call this from any surface where the user's
+ *  Amplitude-relevant state changes mid-session, so the dashboard
+ *  stays current. */
+export function setUserProperties(properties) {
+  if (!API_KEY) { warnNoKey(); return }
+  if (properties == null) return
+  bootstrap()
+  if (!consentGranted()) {
+    _pendingProperties = { ..._pendingProperties, ...properties }
+    return
+  }
+  if (_initialized && _amplitude) {
+    applyProperties(properties)
+    return
+  }
+  _pendingProperties = { ..._pendingProperties, ...properties }
+  _queue.push({ kind: 'setUserProperties', properties })
+}
+
+/** Reset the user binding. Call this on sign-out so the next page
+ *  navigations are attributed to a fresh anonymous device id. Has
+ *  no effect when analytics is disabled.
+ *
+ *  Per #21 Part C: clears both the user_id binding AND the pending
+ *  property cache, so a subsequent sign-in as a different user
+ *  starts with a fully fresh slate (no carry-over properties from
+ *  the previous user). */
+export function anonymize() {
+  if (!API_KEY) { warnNoKey(); return }
+  _pendingUserId = null
+  _pendingProperties = null
+  bootstrap()
+  if (!consentGranted()) return
+  if (_initialized && _amplitude) {
+    try { _amplitude.reset() } catch (_) {}
+    return
+  }
+  _queue.push({ kind: 'anonymize' })
+}
+
+/** Test helper — exposed for unit tests, not for app code.
+ *  Resets module-level state so a fresh bootstrap cycle can be
+ *  exercised. */
+export function __resetForTests() {
+  _bootstrapped = false
+  _amplitude = null
+  _initPromise = null
+  _initialized = false
+  _warnedNoKey = false
+  _pendingUserId = null
+  _pendingProperties = null
+  _queue.length = 0
+}