Session 0032.0 — Transcript

App: vscode-cowriting-plugin Start: 2026-06-12T01-20 (PST) End: 2026-06-12T03-05 (PST) Type: planning-and-executing Posture: autonomous (yolo) Status: FINALIZED

Launch prompt

"What's next?" → operator chose: tidy loose ends, then plan-and-execute #31. Then "keep going" → continued into #34, then #33.

Pre-state

On main, but the baseline was not clean: local main behind origin/main by 3 (session-transcript commits — this app keeps sessions/ in the code repo), an untracked specs/ dir, an abandoned worktree pedantic-brahmagupta-472309 (106 commits behind), and two merged-but-undeleted remote branches. Memory pointed to plan-and-execute #31 next.

Arc

1. Loose-ends tidy

Fast-forwarded main; synced the 0032 claim.
F10 spec coauthoring-interactive-review.md was missing from the content repo — placed it in the content repo working tree (left uncommitted; that repo has operator-owned capture drafts + a diff-view.md edit pending the operator's publish).
Removed the stray code-repo specs/ (one dup of content, one now-placed).
Removed the abandoned worktree (untracked prototype/ + .claude/ snapshotted to ~/.wgl/abandoned-worktree-snapshots/pedantic-brahmagupta-472309/).
Deleted the two merged remote branches.
Correction: the "0024 unfinalized" loose end carried in prior memory is FALSE — 0024 has a finalized transcript. Dropped from memory.

2. #31 — inline-at-anchor proposals (PR #36, merged; issue closed)

TDD. renderReview now associates each resolved proposal with the current-side block its anchorStart falls in and emits the cw-proposal block right after that block; same-block order by anchorStart then id; unresolved/unplaceable still trail (INV-33/34). Implements the placement the F10 spec §2/§6.2 already specified (the #29 trailing-block was a recorded v1 deferral). +5 unit tests, +1 E2E in-place assertion. One pre-existing F7 E2E flake (fixed-timeout settle() race) passed on re-run — unrelated to the change (different code path).

3. #34 — delete F6 dead two-pane view (PR #37, merged; issue closed)

Removed the dead vscode.diff VIEW: DiffViewController.toggle/findDiffTab/ epochLabel/isDiffOpen, the cowriting-baseline: content provider + BASELINE_SCHEME + baselineUri + content-provider emitter, the toggleDiffView command + ctrl+alt+d keybinding. Kept the baseline DATA layer fully intact (ensureBaseline/advance/pin/capture, getBaseline, onDidChangeBaseline, persistence INV-19, machine-landing advance INV-18). Rewrote the diffView E2E suite to the baseline-data-layer tests; flipped F10 + no-workspace assertions to "toggleDiffView absent."

4. #33 — intra-emphasis sentinel hardening (characterized, DEFERRED)

Reproduced two failure modes with the real renderer (recorded as issue #33 comment). Operator chose to defer to its own session. No code changed.

Cut state

main clean and synced; 0 open PRs. #31 + #34 shipped and closed. 194 unit + 49 E2E green; typecheck + build clean. No deploy pipeline (VS Code extension, no flotilla/PPE).

Deferred decisions

Kept pinDiffBaseline in #34 against the issue's literal acceptance. Alternative: remove it as the issue listed. Why: the canonical Solution Design (spec §6.7) scopes the removal to the two-pane VIEW only ("keep the controller + baseline store"); pin() is a §6.4 baseline-lifecycle op, never touches vscode.diff, and is exercised by live F7 baseline-reset tests. Spec wins over the P3 capture draft (documentation-leads-automation). Logged for operator awareness.
F10 spec left UNCOMMITTED in the content repo working tree rather than committed/pushed. Alternative: push it. Why: the content repo has operator-owned pending work (capture issue-drafts + a diff-view.md edit); content publishing is the Author's gesture (per wgl-capture). Surfaced to the operator.
Discarded the abandoned worktree's untracked files (prototype/index.html + .claude config). Snapshot-and-proceed: copied to ~/.wgl/abandoned-worktree-snapshots/ before git worktree remove --force.

Next /goal

/goal plan-and-execute #33 (intra-emphasis sentinel hardening) via the token-aware HTML-post-process approach recommended in the issue #33 comment, per specs/coauthoring-interactive-review.md §1.7/§9

(Alternatives in the backlog: #32 scroll-sync needs a Solution Design first (brainstorming); #35 repo rename is an outward admin gesture awaiting operator timing.)

4.5 KiB Raw Blame History