# Session 0030.0 — Transcript > App: vscode-cowriting-plugin > Start: 2026-06-11T23-48 (PST) > End: 2026-06-12T00-42 (PST) > Type: planning-and-executing > Posture: autonomous (yolo) > Status: **FINALIZED** > Outcome: **F10 (#29) shipped to `main`** via PR #30; issue #29 closed. ## Launch prompt ``` /goal next → plan-and-execute #29 (F10 — interactive markdown review). Spec: specs/coauthoring-interactive-review.md (graduated in brainstorming session 0029). Markdown preview as the single interactive review surface: clean zero-annotation editor + annotated preview with on/off toggle (green=human / blue=LLM / strikethrough), ✓/✗ accept-reject for LLM-only changes in the webview. LLM changes surfaced as pending F4 proposals (✓=F4 accept, ✗=F4 reject). One pure renderReview overlay; reverses F9 INV-26; INV-32..34; 4 slices. ``` `/goal next` resolved the `Next /goal:` field recorded by session 0029's finalize to "plan-and-execute #29 (F10)". ## Pre-state - On `main`, clean (origin/main behind 1 — fast-forwarded). Anchor #29 is `type/feature` with a **graduated** Solution Design (`specs/coauthoring-interactive-review.md`) → R2/R3 gate satisfied. - F2–F9 + F7.1 shipped; F10 is "mostly assembly" of F3 (attribution `spansFor`), F4 (propose/accept seam), F6 (baseline), F7/F9 (render engine) + 3 new pieces: strip editor decorations, collapse F9's two modes to one on/off toggle, make the preview interactive. ## Plan Goal: plan-and-execute F10 (#29). "Write left, review right" — clean editor, the rendered preview as the single interactive review surface. 4 slices (spec §7.2), 14 tasks; plan written via `superpowers:writing-plans`, archived to the content repo `plans/` at finalize. Executed via `superpowers:subagent-driven-development` (fresh implementer per slice + spec-compliance and code-quality review each). **Code reconciliations (spec vs. actual), discovered by reading the code first:** public seams are `acceptById(docPath,id)`/`rejectById(docPath,id)` (not private `accept`/`reject`); `Proposal` carries `anchorId` resolved via `artifact.anchors` → `resolve(text, fp)` (not literal offsets); no `onDidChangeProposals` existed (added); `trackChangesPreview` already took `AttributionController` (F9), added `ProposalController`; `extension.ts` constructed the preview BEFORE the proposal controller — reordered. ## Session arc (turn-by-turn) 1. **Init.** `/goal next` → routed to `wgl-planning-and-executing`. Claimed session 0030 (peek: nothing in flight). Fast-forwarded `main`. Read the F10 spec + mapped the 8 files F10 touches via 3 parallel Explore agents (exact signatures), then read the central bodies (`trackChangesModel.ts`, `trackChangesPreview.ts`, `proposalController.ts`, `extension.ts`) for ground truth. 2. **Plan.** Wrote `docs/superpowers/plans/2026-06-11-f10-interactive-review.md` (4 slices, 14 tasks, TDD on the pure engine, host-E2E for the vscode layer). Branch `f10-interactive-review`; committed the plan. 3. **SLICE-1 (clean editor, INV-32).** Implementer stripped F3 attribution decorations (kept `spansFor`), removed F4 in-editor comment threads + pending decoration (refactored bookkeeping to `state.live`/`state.unresolved`), hid the F6 diff command/`ctrl+alt+d` + attribution toggle. Spec review ✅. **Code-quality review found** the `visible`/`toggle`/`isVisible`/`toggleAttribution` toggle was now dead/misleading → fixed directly (retired it; spec §6.2 says so). 189 unit green. 4. **SLICE-2 (combined render engine, INV-33).** Strict TDD. Extracted `colorByAuthor` from the F9 sentinels; added `renderPlain` + `renderReview` (+ `ProposalView`). Deferred removing public `renderAuthorship` to SLICE-3 (kept the slice green). Spec ✅. **Code-quality review found a real correctness bug:** `renderReview` matched a block's source range by raw-string equality → misaligned author coloring for duplicate paragraphs. Fixed (TDD, positional range pointer) + collapsed a redundant branch + escaped the proposal id. 41 model / 198 total green. 5. **SLICE-3 (interactive controller + webview, INV-34).** Removed public `renderAuthorship`; added `ProposalController.listProposals`/`onDidChangeProposals`/ `keyFor`; collapsed the preview to an on/off toggle taking `ProposalController`; routed ✓/✗/setMode webview messages through `acceptById`/`rejectById` (webview never mutates the doc); status-bar indicator (PUC-6); rebuilt the webview asset (on/off checkbox + ✓/✗ click→postMessage + CSS); reordered `extension.ts`. Spec ✅ (INV-34 traced end-to-end). Code-quality ✅ with one polish: renamed the webview panel title "Track changes" → "Review" (fixed directly). 6. **SLICE-4 (tests & docs).** Updated obsolete suites (F9 authorship-mode + retired-toggle), added `test/e2e/suite/f10Review.test.ts`, wrote `docs/MANUAL-SMOKE-F10.md` + README F10 section. Found + fixed one real seam bug: `statusText()` returned stale text after `hide()` → added `hideStatus()` clearing the text. **E2E green: 46 + 5 passing.** Spec ✅, code-quality ✅. 7. **Final review + verification.** Whole-implementation review = ready to merge (all invariants verified across slice seams). Ran the full suite myself: 189 unit + 51 E2E + clean build, tree clean. 8. **Ship.** Pushed branch; created PR #30 (Gitea API); merged to `main` (HTTP 200); synced `main`, deleted the branch (local + remote); commented + closed #29; post-merge sanity (build + 189 unit) green. 9. **Finalize.** Archived the plan to the content repo `plans/`; updated memory; published this transcript. ## Cut state (final) - **`main`** carries F10 (merge commit `4160890`, PR #30). Working tree clean except the pre-existing untracked `specs/` dir. - **Tests:** 189 unit (vitest, vscode-free) + 51 host E2E + clean esbuild build. - **Tracker:** issue #29 closed; **no open issues remain** (Epic #1 closed). - **No deploy pipeline** — VS Code extension, no flotilla/PPE/prod stage; "done" = merge to `main` per spec §7.3. Manual webview smoke (`docs/MANUAL-SMOKE-F10.md`) is the only step not automatable (sealed sandbox) — left for the operator. ## Deferred decisions - **Proposal placement: trailing blocks vs. inline-at-anchor.** Spec §2/§6.2 describes pending proposals "rendered **inline at its resolved anchor**." The implemented `renderReview` instead appends ALL proposals as trailing `cw-proposal` blocks (anchored before unanchored), per the plan's explicit Task-6 v1 design note (determinism + simplicity; inline-injection into the block-level diff body is materially more complex). INV-34 holds (proposals are visible, carry ✓/✗, never dropped); the deviation is purely positional. The final whole-impl review judged it defensible and non-blocking. **Deferred:** inline-at-anchor placement of resolved proposals → candidate follow-up issue, alongside the spec §9 open items (preview→source scroll-sync, intra-emphasis sentinel hardening, deleting F6's dead two-pane view code, the repo rename). Worth confirming with the operator whether to file these. ## Loose ends - Stray untracked `specs/` dir in the code repo (F8 + F10 design working copies; they belong in the content repo `specs/` collection and were already submitted there) — left untouched (carried from sessions 0024/0027). - Stray worktree `.claude/worktrees/pedantic-brahmagupta-472309/` from a prior session — not cleaned up here. - Session 0024 still unfinalized (carried). ## Next-session prompt The F10 follow-ups are not filed as issues and the tracker has no open anchor, so the next move is a **capture** session to file them (issue-anchored discipline, R2): ``` /goal capture the F10 follow-ups as Gitea issues — lead: inline-at-anchor placement of resolved proposals in the review preview (per specs/coauthoring-interactive-review.md §2/§6.2; today they render as trailing cw-proposal blocks); plus the §9 open items — preview→source scroll-sync, intra-emphasis sentinel hardening, deleting F6's dead two-pane view code, and the repo rename to vscode-markdown-cowriting-plugin ``` Read [[f10-interactive-review-shipped]] first. Then a follow-up planning-and-executing session can take whichever filed issue the operator picks.