# Session 0011.0 — Transcript > App: vscode-cowriting-plugin > Start: 2026-06-10T21-41 (PST) · End: 2026-06-10T21-52 (PST) > Type: brainstorming > Goal: spec Feature #12 (F4 — propose/accept) — leg 2 of the `/goal F4` arc > (session 0010 captured #12; this session designs it). > Outcome: **Solution Design graduated** — content > `specs/coauthoring-propose-accept.md` (`c55a681`); all five design forks > resolved. ## Launch prompt ``` Brainstorm the Solution Design spec for Feature #12 (F4 — propose/accept diff flow: inline diff + keep/reject on the applyAgentEdit seam) on benstull/vscode-cowriting-plugin, resolving the five design forks routed there by the capture (proposals[] shape; rendering primitive; propose-by-default vs. direct mode; multi-range seam growth; accept/reject granularity), then graduate it to vscode-cowriting-plugin-content/specs/. (Continuation of /goal F4, session 0010 capture → this spec session.) ``` ## Plan 1. Orient: anchor Feature #12 (non-epic — R1 gate passes); inputs = the F3/F2 graduated specs (`coauthoring-attribution.md`, `coauthoring-inner-loop.md`), the shipped F3 code (seam, store, anchorer, decorations), Epic #1, the F2/F3 spec precedents as templates. No BDD corpus registered for this app. 2. Explore the five design forks routed by #12, grounded in the actual F3 code. 3. Write the Solution Design (local draft; Mermaid; host-E2E tasks first-class; Claude Design vs Claude Code recorded). 4. Finalize via wgl-session-finalize (brainstorming addendum): artifact guard → submit-spec.sh → content `specs/` (autonomous → `--status graduated`). ## Pre-session state Clean pushed `main` (`f21a6fd` after this session's claim). Feature #12 freshly filed by session 0010 (same conversation). F3 shipped (#6, PR #7) with the `applyAgentEdit` seam as the single machine-edit ingress and `proposals: unknown[]` reserved in the sidecar at `SCHEMA_VERSION` 1. ## Turn-by-turn arc 1. **Init.** Claimed 0011 (`--type brainstorming`); clean pushed `main` baseline; anchor #12 is `type/feature` → R1 gate passes. 2. **Context.** Explore-agent map of the shipped F3 machinery (model.ts `proposals: unknown[]` reserved at SCHEMA_VERSION 1; `applyAgentEdit` signature/behavior incl. version guard + diff-minimize + pending-edit consume; store prune TODO at store.ts:65; Anchorer ladder; decorations + Comments API patterns; liveTurn flow with the exact proposal insertion point between turn completion and seam call; E2E ingress patterns). Read the F3 spec end-to-end as the structural template. 3. **Forks resolved** (full alternatives in spec §6.7): (a) `proposals[]` pending-only on shared anchors/Provenance; (b) rendering = second Comments controller (fenced-diff thread + ✓/✗ actions) + amber range decoration; (c) propose-by-default wholesale, no user-facing direct mode, seam unchanged as accept path; (d) seam stays single-range — N proposals per turnId; (e) whole-proposal granularity, hunk-splitting additive later. Bonus: staleness guard = the existing fingerprint exact-text resolve at decision time (INV-11); persistence at propose time (paid-turn loss argument). 4. **Spec written** locally (`docs/superpowers/specs/2026-06-10-f4-propose-accept-design.md`). New invariants INV-10..13; 5 slices; host E2E first-class; Claude-Code-not-Claude-Design recorded in §5 (native surfaces only). 5. **Self-review** passed (no placeholders; husk/stale semantics consistent; F3 E2E untouched by the propose-by-default flip). 6. **Finalize.** Artifact guard satisfied; submitted graduated as content `specs/coauthoring-propose-accept.md` (`c55a681`); local draft removed (F3 precedent: content copy is canonical, no local spec in the plugin repo); local content clone fast-forwarded; memory updated (`f4-propose-accept-spec-graduated` + index; stale Next /goal in the F3 memory redirected). ## Deferred decisions - **Skipped interactive section-by-section design review** (superpowers brainstorming gates) under autonomous posture + the standing `/goal F4` directive; the spec graduated without operator review per the autonomous default (`submit-spec.sh --status graduated`). The operator can downgrade / amend post-hoc; all five fork resolutions are logged with alternatives in §6.7. - **No user-facing direct-apply mode retained** (fork c) — chose the wholesale propose-by-default flip on YAGNI grounds; if review friction shows up in practice, a `cowriting.machineEdits` setting is a small follow-up. - **Proposal counter-edits** (human amends proposed text before accepting) deferred to OPEN→later — today's answer is reject + re-instruct; flagged in spec §9 rather than designed now. ## Cut state (end of session) | Item | State | | --- | --- | | Spec `coauthoring-propose-accept.md` | **Graduated** in content repo at `c55a681` | | Plugin repo `main` | Clean, pushed (no code changes this session) | | Content repo working tree | Two pre-existing uncommitted issue drafts (`f3-live-attribution.md`, `f4-propose-accept.md`) — Author's plate, unchanged | | Feature #12 | Open, now spec-backed — eligible R2 anchor for planning-and-executing | | Memory | `f4-propose-accept-spec-graduated` written; carries the current Next /goal | ## What lands on the operator's plate - Review the graduated spec at `vscode-cowriting-plugin-content/specs/coauthoring-propose-accept.md` — it graduated without interactive review (autonomous posture); §6.7 + §9 hold every fork resolution and alternative if anything warrants re-litigating. - The two uncommitted content-repo issue drafts remain yours to publish or discard. ## Prompt the operator can paste into the next session ``` /goal Implement Feature #12 (F4 propose/accept) per the graduated spec vscode-cowriting-plugin-content/specs/coauthoring-propose-accept.md — plan just-in-time from its §7.2 slices, then execute; done = unit + host E2E green and the live smoke shows propose → accept → Claude-attributed. ```