Undo in the editor rendered wrong marks in the F10 review preview: restored
baseline text (and reverted Claude text) was colored as human-authored. Root
cause — attributionController.onDidChange attributed every non-seam document
change to currentAuthor() (always human) and ignored e.reason, so an undo/redo
that re-inserts text created a fresh human span over it. renderReview is pure;
the wrong marks came from these false author spans.
Fix: on e.reason === Undo|Redo, reconcile span geometry but do NOT attribute the
re-inserted chars — an undo is history navigation, not authorship, so restored
text stays neutral (unattributed) rather than falsely claimed by the human.
applyChange gains an `attributeInserted` flag (default true; false on undo/redo);
seam matching is also skipped on undo/redo (the seam only applies forward edits).
Restored text becomes neutral rather than recovering its exact prior provenance
(e.g. undoing a deletion of Claude's text shows it unattributed, not blue) —
perfect restoration would need an attribution history stack synced to the editor
undo stack (fragile due to edit coalescing); filed mentally as a follow-up. The
neutral behavior removes the misleading marks, which is the reported defect.
Tests: E2E reproduces the mid-edit-undo case (buffer stays dirty so the disk-sync
guard doesn't mask it) and asserts restored text is unattributed; +3 unit tests
for the geometric-only applyChange path. 197 unit + 50 E2E green; typecheck clean.
Closes#38
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
F10 (#29) made the rendered preview the single review surface and hid the F6
two-pane vscode.diff view (command + ctrl+alt+d set when:false). This removes
that now-unreachable view code:
- DiffViewController: drop toggle/findDiffTab/epochLabel/isDiffOpen, the
`cowriting-baseline:` TextDocumentContentProvider + BASELINE_SCHEME + baselineUri
+ the content-provider change emitter, and the toggleDiffView command. The
baseline DATA layer is fully intact — ensureBaseline/advance/pin/capture,
getBaseline, baselineFilePath, onDidChangeBaseline, persistence (INV-19), and
the machine-landing auto-advance (INV-18) that F7/F10 consume.
- package.json: remove the toggleDiffView command, its commandPalette entry, and
the ctrl+alt+d keybinding.
- E2E: diffView suite keeps the baseline-data-layer tests, drops the two-pane
view tests; the F10 + no-workspace suites assert toggleDiffView is now absent
(was: declared-but-hidden).
Deliberate deviation from the issue's literal acceptance: pinDiffBaseline is
KEPT. The canonical Solution Design (coauthoring-interactive-review.md §6.7)
scopes the removal to the two-pane VIEW only ("keep the controller + baseline
store"); pin() lives in the baseline lifecycle (§6.4), never touches vscode.diff,
and is exercised by live F7 baseline-reset tests. Where the P3 capture draft and
the approved spec conflict, the spec wins (documentation-leads-automation).
194 unit + 49 E2E green; typecheck + build clean. No F7/F10 behavior change.
Closes#34
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
In the F10 review preview, renderReview now emits each pending proposal whose
anchor resolves as a cw-proposal block immediately after the current-side block
its anchorStart falls in — answering "what is Claude proposing, and where?" by
position — instead of appending all proposals as trailing blocks. Proposals in
the same block are ordered by anchorStart then id (deterministic, INV-33); a
proposal whose anchor doesn't resolve (or precedes all blocks) still trails as a
cw-proposal-unanchored block, never dropped (INV-34).
This implements the inline-at-anchor placement the graduated F10 Solution Design
already specified (coauthoring-interactive-review.md §2/§6.2); the trailing-block
behavior shipped in #29 was a recorded v1 deferral.
Unit: mid-document placement, two proposals in distinct blocks, same-block
ordering determinism, anchored-before-trailing, mixed-set determinism.
E2E: the F10 propose test now asserts the proposal renders before the following
block (in place); accept still lands + clears.
194 unit + 51 E2E green; typecheck clean.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds test/e2e/suite/f10Review.test.ts covering the F10 flow: open preview
(mode "on", fresh baseline all-unchanged), type → cw-by-human span, propose →
cw-proposal block with ✓/✗, accept → lands + baseline advances + block clears,
reject → vanishes + doc untouched, toggle off → renderPlain has no cw- marks,
status-bar PUC-6 (indicator with no panel, hidden once opened), and the
clean-editor INV-32 facts (retired toggleAttribution, F6 ctrl+alt+d hidden).
Rewrites the obsolete F9 authorship-mode test as an F10 review test
(cw-by-claude in the on-state render; getMode defaults to "on"). Updates
attribution.test.ts (drops the retired isVisible/toggleAttribution toggle,
asserts the toggle is gone) and noWorkspace.test.ts (toggleAttribution +
acceptProposal/rejectProposal are retired, preview-only — INV-32).
Honesty fix in the status-bar seam: hideStatus() clears statusItem.text so
statusText() reports undefined when the indicator is hidden (it previously
returned its stale last value after a panel opened).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Migrate test surface to URI-string keys; add out-of-workspace file (persisted
in global storage) + untitled-buffer (in-memory, not persisted) cases; assert
F6 toggle works with no folder open. No LLM.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Playing with F4, the operator hit VS Code's default "Reply…" box on a
proposal thread: no submit command is wired for cowriting.proposals, so
typed text had nowhere to go. Proposals are decide-only (accept/reject in
the title bar); discussion belongs in a coauthoring thread. Set
canReply=false so the dead input never renders, and expose canReply on the
test-facing RenderedProposal with an E2E assertion.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The accept E2E exposed a latent F3 limitation: VS Code word-diffs one
applied WorkspaceEdit into several minimal hunks when old/new share
interior tokens, so the registry's per-hunk exact match missed and seam
edits fell through as fragmented human spans. PendingEditRegistry.match
is replaced by matchEvent (all hunks inside the registered full range +
equal net delta — one applyEdit is one change event). Plan AMENDMENT 1.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Drives the extension's returned ThreadController API + asserts the on-disk
sidecar and rendered Comments state (spec §6.8 fallback). All 4 host tests
green against VS Code 1.124.0.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Ben Stull