add sessions/0030/SESSION-0030.0-TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-11T23-48--2026-06-12T00-42.md + replace placeholder/variant SESSION-0030.0-TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-11T23-48--INPROGRESS.md

sessions/0030/SESSION-0030.0-TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-11T23-48--2026-06-12T00-42.md

@@ -0,0 +1,141 @@
+# Session 0030.0 — Transcript
+
+> App: vscode-cowriting-plugin
+> Start: 2026-06-11T23-48 (PST)
+> End: 2026-06-12T00-42 (PST)
+> Type: planning-and-executing
+> Posture: autonomous (yolo)
+> Status: **FINALIZED**
+> Outcome: **F10 (#29) shipped to `main`** via PR #30; issue #29 closed.
+
+## Launch prompt
+
+```
+/goal next → plan-and-execute #29 (F10 — interactive markdown review).
+Spec: specs/coauthoring-interactive-review.md (graduated in brainstorming session 0029).
+Markdown preview as the single interactive review surface: clean zero-annotation
+editor + annotated preview with on/off toggle (green=human / blue=LLM / strikethrough),
+✓/✗ accept-reject for LLM-only changes in the webview. LLM changes surfaced as pending
+F4 proposals (✓=F4 accept, ✗=F4 reject). One pure renderReview overlay; reverses F9
+INV-26; INV-32..34; 4 slices.
+```
+
+`/goal next` resolved the `Next /goal:` field recorded by session 0029's finalize
+to "plan-and-execute #29 (F10)".
+
+## Pre-state
+
+- On `main`, clean (origin/main behind 1 — fast-forwarded). Anchor #29 is
+  `type/feature` with a **graduated** Solution Design
+  (`specs/coauthoring-interactive-review.md`) → R2/R3 gate satisfied.
+- F2–F9 + F7.1 shipped; F10 is "mostly assembly" of F3 (attribution `spansFor`),
+  F4 (propose/accept seam), F6 (baseline), F7/F9 (render engine) + 3 new pieces:
+  strip editor decorations, collapse F9's two modes to one on/off toggle, make the
+  preview interactive.
+
+## Plan
+
+Goal: plan-and-execute F10 (#29). "Write left, review right" — clean editor, the
+rendered preview as the single interactive review surface. 4 slices (spec §7.2),
+14 tasks; plan written via `superpowers:writing-plans`, archived to the content
+repo `plans/` at finalize. Executed via `superpowers:subagent-driven-development`
+(fresh implementer per slice + spec-compliance and code-quality review each).
+
+**Code reconciliations (spec vs. actual), discovered by reading the code first:**
+public seams are `acceptById(docPath,id)`/`rejectById(docPath,id)` (not private
+`accept`/`reject`); `Proposal` carries `anchorId` resolved via `artifact.anchors`
+→ `resolve(text, fp)` (not literal offsets); no `onDidChangeProposals` existed (added);
+`trackChangesPreview` already took `AttributionController` (F9), added `ProposalController`;
+`extension.ts` constructed the preview BEFORE the proposal controller — reordered.
+
+## Session arc (turn-by-turn)
+
+1. **Init.** `/goal next` → routed to `wgl-planning-and-executing`. Claimed session
+   0030 (peek: nothing in flight). Fast-forwarded `main`. Read the F10 spec + mapped
+   the 8 files F10 touches via 3 parallel Explore agents (exact signatures), then
+   read the central bodies (`trackChangesModel.ts`, `trackChangesPreview.ts`,
+   `proposalController.ts`, `extension.ts`) for ground truth.
+2. **Plan.** Wrote `docs/superpowers/plans/2026-06-11-f10-interactive-review.md`
+   (4 slices, 14 tasks, TDD on the pure engine, host-E2E for the vscode layer).
+   Branch `f10-interactive-review`; committed the plan.
+3. **SLICE-1 (clean editor, INV-32).** Implementer stripped F3 attribution
+   decorations (kept `spansFor`), removed F4 in-editor comment threads + pending
+   decoration (refactored bookkeeping to `state.live`/`state.unresolved`), hid the
+   F6 diff command/`ctrl+alt+d` + attribution toggle. Spec review ✅. **Code-quality
+   review found** the `visible`/`toggle`/`isVisible`/`toggleAttribution` toggle was
+   now dead/misleading → fixed directly (retired it; spec §6.2 says so). 189 unit green.
+4. **SLICE-2 (combined render engine, INV-33).** Strict TDD. Extracted
+   `colorByAuthor` from the F9 sentinels; added `renderPlain` + `renderReview`
+   (+ `ProposalView`). Deferred removing public `renderAuthorship` to SLICE-3 (kept
+   the slice green). Spec ✅. **Code-quality review found a real correctness bug:**
+   `renderReview` matched a block's source range by raw-string equality →
+   misaligned author coloring for duplicate paragraphs. Fixed (TDD, positional
+   range pointer) + collapsed a redundant branch + escaped the proposal id. 41 model
+   / 198 total green.
+5. **SLICE-3 (interactive controller + webview, INV-34).** Removed public
+   `renderAuthorship`; added `ProposalController.listProposals`/`onDidChangeProposals`/
+   `keyFor`; collapsed the preview to an on/off toggle taking `ProposalController`;
+   routed ✓/✗/setMode webview messages through `acceptById`/`rejectById` (webview
+   never mutates the doc); status-bar indicator (PUC-6); rebuilt the webview asset
+   (on/off checkbox + ✓/✗ click→postMessage + CSS); reordered `extension.ts`. Spec ✅
+   (INV-34 traced end-to-end). Code-quality ✅ with one polish: renamed the webview
+   panel title "Track changes" → "Review" (fixed directly).
+6. **SLICE-4 (tests & docs).** Updated obsolete suites (F9 authorship-mode +
+   retired-toggle), added `test/e2e/suite/f10Review.test.ts`, wrote
+   `docs/MANUAL-SMOKE-F10.md` + README F10 section. Found + fixed one real seam bug:
+   `statusText()` returned stale text after `hide()` → added `hideStatus()` clearing
+   the text. **E2E green: 46 + 5 passing.** Spec ✅, code-quality ✅.
+7. **Final review + verification.** Whole-implementation review = ready to merge
+   (all invariants verified across slice seams). Ran the full suite myself:
+   189 unit + 51 E2E + clean build, tree clean.
+8. **Ship.** Pushed branch; created PR #30 (Gitea API); merged to `main` (HTTP 200);
+   synced `main`, deleted the branch (local + remote); commented + closed #29;
+   post-merge sanity (build + 189 unit) green.
+9. **Finalize.** Archived the plan to the content repo `plans/`; updated memory;
+   published this transcript.
+
+## Cut state (final)
+
+- **`main`** carries F10 (merge commit `4160890`, PR #30). Working tree clean
+  except the pre-existing untracked `specs/` dir.
+- **Tests:** 189 unit (vitest, vscode-free) + 51 host E2E + clean esbuild build.
+- **Tracker:** issue #29 closed; **no open issues remain** (Epic #1 closed).
+- **No deploy pipeline** — VS Code extension, no flotilla/PPE/prod stage; "done" =
+  merge to `main` per spec §7.3. Manual webview smoke (`docs/MANUAL-SMOKE-F10.md`)
+  is the only step not automatable (sealed sandbox) — left for the operator.
+
+## Deferred decisions
+
+- **Proposal placement: trailing blocks vs. inline-at-anchor.** Spec §2/§6.2
+  describes pending proposals "rendered **inline at its resolved anchor**." The
+  implemented `renderReview` instead appends ALL proposals as trailing
+  `cw-proposal` blocks (anchored before unanchored), per the plan's explicit
+  Task-6 v1 design note (determinism + simplicity; inline-injection into the
+  block-level diff body is materially more complex). INV-34 holds (proposals are
+  visible, carry ✓/✗, never dropped); the deviation is purely positional. The
+  final whole-impl review judged it defensible and non-blocking. **Deferred:**
+  inline-at-anchor placement of resolved proposals → candidate follow-up issue,
+  alongside the spec §9 open items (preview→source scroll-sync, intra-emphasis
+  sentinel hardening, deleting F6's dead two-pane view code, the repo rename).
+  Worth confirming with the operator whether to file these.
+
+## Loose ends
+
+- Stray untracked `specs/` dir in the code repo (F8 + F10 design working copies;
+  they belong in the content repo `specs/` collection and were already submitted
+  there) — left untouched (carried from sessions 0024/0027).
+- Stray worktree `.claude/worktrees/pedantic-brahmagupta-472309/` from a prior
+  session — not cleaned up here.
+- Session 0024 still unfinalized (carried).
+
+## Next-session prompt
+
+The F10 follow-ups are not filed as issues and the tracker has no open anchor, so
+the next move is a **capture** session to file them (issue-anchored discipline, R2):
+
+```
+/goal capture the F10 follow-ups as Gitea issues — lead: inline-at-anchor placement of resolved proposals in the review preview (per specs/coauthoring-interactive-review.md §2/§6.2; today they render as trailing cw-proposal blocks); plus the §9 open items — preview→source scroll-sync, intra-emphasis sentinel hardening, deleting F6's dead two-pane view code, and the repo rename to vscode-markdown-cowriting-plugin
+```
+
+Read [[f10-interactive-review-shipped]] first. Then a follow-up
+planning-and-executing session can take whichever filed issue the operator picks.

sessions/0030/SESSION-0030.0-TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-11T23-48--INPROGRESS.md

@@ -1,29 +0,0 @@
-# Session 0030.0 — Transcript
-
-> App: vscode-cowriting-plugin
-> Start: 2026-06-11T23-48 (PST)
-> Type: planning-and-executing
-> Status: **PLACEHOLDER — claimed at session start; finalized at session end.**
->
-> This file reserves session ID 0030 for vscode-cowriting-plugin. The driver replaces this
-> body with the full transcript and renames the file to its final
-> SESSION-0030.0-TRANSCRIPT-2026-06-11T23-48--<end>.md form at session end.
-
-## Launch prompt
-
-```
-/goal next → plan-and-execute #29 (F10 — interactive markdown review).
-Spec: specs/coauthoring-interactive-review.md (graduated in brainstorming session 0029).
-Markdown preview as the single interactive review surface: clean zero-annotation
-editor + annotated preview with on/off toggle (green=human / blue=LLM / strikethrough),
-✓/✗ accept-reject for LLM-only changes in the webview. LLM changes surfaced as pending
-F4 proposals (✓=F4 accept, ✗=F4 reject). One pure renderReview overlay; reverses F9
-INV-26; INV-32..34; 4 slices.
-
-```
-
-## Deferred decisions
-
-_Autonomous-mode low-confidence calls the driver made and would have
-liked operator input on. Appended as the session runs; surfaced at
-finalize. Empty if none._