The §9.1 Slice-2 AI-suggested tag chips, deferred since the propose
modal landed, now wired up. As the propose-RFC draft fills in, the
backend asks Claude Haiku for tags drawn ONLY from the corpus's
existing tag set (the de-facto taxonomy — v1 tags are free-form chip
input, there is no curated list), surfaced as clickable suggestion
chips. Nothing auto-applies; the user clicks to add.
Backend:
- tag_suggest.py: universe gather (distinct corpus tags, most-common
first), Haiku prompt + tolerant reply parser (drops invented tags,
dedupes, clamps confidence), in-process per-user rate limit.
- providers.construct_haiku(): dedicated Haiku provider from the
operator key, independent of ENABLED_MODELS — tag suggestion always
uses the cheap+fast model. No RFC slug at propose time, so the §6.7
funder path does not apply.
- POST /api/rfcs/suggest-tags: contributor-gated, rate-limited.
Degrades to an empty list (never an error) when no Anthropic key is
bound, the corpus has no tags, or the draft is empty.
Frontend:
- ProposeModal: debounced suggestion fetch (700ms, stale-response
guarded), clickable suggestion chips, and the required inline
disclosure that the draft text is sent to Anthropic.
- api.suggestTags(): forgiving — any non-OK resolves to [].
Tests: 11 new (vertical contributor-gating / filtering / no-key /
empty-corpus / 429, plus units for gather, parser tolerance, max,
short-circuit, provider-failure). Full suite 351 green.
New secret on deploy: ANTHROPIC_API_KEY (see CHANGELOG Upgrade steps).
Disclosure copy wants a counsel pass before deploy, per #22 discipline.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds an optional "What will you be using this for?" capture as a sibling
to the required justification on both propose surfaces, per roadmap #26.
- propose-RFC modal (ProposeModal): optional textarea below the required
"Why is this RFC needed?" pitch, labeled "What will you be using this
RFC for? (optional)".
- propose-PR modal (PRModal): optional textarea below the required
description, labeled "What will you be using this change for?".
- Backend: ProposeBody / OpenPRBody gain an optional `proposed_use_case`
(NULL/omitted accepted, no min, 8000-char cap matching the existing
free-text bound). Persisted to a new canonical side table
`proposed_use_cases` keyed by PR number, mirrored onto the cache
columns added by migration 021. Returned on the proposal list/detail,
RFC detail (by slug), and PR detail endpoints.
- Display: ProposalView, RFCView (main only), and PRView render the
captured use case with a muted "left blank" treatment when NULL.
- migration 021: nullable `proposed_use_case` on cached_rfcs/cached_prs
plus the reconcile-proof `proposed_use_cases` truth table.
- New vertical test_proposed_use_case_vertical: persists+returns when
supplied, accepted as NULL/omitted, for both surfaces.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Wave 5 / Track A. Roadmap item #13. Folds in #21 Part C user-identity-
lifecycle work inline rather than as a follow-up release (operator
ask: "implement Amplitude best practices from the very get-go").
Wraps @amplitude/unified with:
- consent-gated lazy init (v0.13.0 cookie banner; SDK never loads
without explicit analytics opt-in)
- amplitude.initAll(KEY, { analytics: { autocapture: true },
sessionReplay: { sampleRate: 1 } }) — vendor-recommended shape
- identify({ user_id, properties? }) with set vs setOnce semantics
- setUserProperties(properties) for mid-session state changes
- anonymize() clears both user_id binding AND property cache
Wired into App.jsx (identify on me.user with role / permission_state /
passcode_set / device_trusted as set; first_sign_in_at / account_created_at
as setOnce; Page Viewed on route change; Sign-out fires User Signed
Out + anonymize), Login.jsx (User Signed In + Beta Access Requested),
and the per-feature surfaces (ProposeModal, PRModal, RFCView,
RFCDiscussionPanel, PRView, Admin).
Binding: VITE_AMPLITUDE_API_KEY via `flotilla overlay set`
(bundle-embedded public key like VITE_TURNSTILE_SITE_KEY — not
secret). Mid-Session-L correction: original dispatch brief specified
secret-set; vendor guidance + bundle visibility settled it as overlay.
PII discipline: no email, no display_name, no gitea_login, no free-text
fields ever sent. Properties are opaque ids + enums + timestamps +
booleans only.
Subagent ξ shipped the wrapper structure + nine-event taxonomy on
feature/v0.15.0-amplitude (0fd8c52 + 6cfbf69 post-correction).
Driver-side integration extended the wrapper with setUserProperties
+ identify properties for the #21 Part C identity-lifecycle work.
Frontend build verified green.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Brings the §1 bot wrapper, the §4 cache (webhook + reconciler), the
§5 schema (six numbered migrations), Gitea OAuth + §6 user
provisioning, the §7 catalog left pane, and the propose-to-merge
vertical: propose modal opens an idea PR against the meta repo, an
owner merges from the pending-idea view, the cache picks it up via
webhook or reconciler sweep, and the catalog renders the new
super-draft.
Per §1 the bot is the only Git writer; every commit, branch
creation, and PR merge carries the §6.5 On-behalf-of: trailer and
an `actions` audit row. Per §4 the cache is never written from a
user action — it's webhook+reconciler only.
Covered by `backend/tests/test_propose_vertical.py` against an
in-process Gitea simulator.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Ben Stull