Commit Graph

2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Ben Stull 7c6c906db2 #26: optional proposed-use-case field on propose-RFC + propose-PR
Adds an optional "What will you be using this for?" capture as a sibling
to the required justification on both propose surfaces, per roadmap #26.

- propose-RFC modal (ProposeModal): optional textarea below the required
  "Why is this RFC needed?" pitch, labeled "What will you be using this
  RFC for? (optional)".
- propose-PR modal (PRModal): optional textarea below the required
  description, labeled "What will you be using this change for?".
- Backend: ProposeBody / OpenPRBody gain an optional `proposed_use_case`
  (NULL/omitted accepted, no min, 8000-char cap matching the existing
  free-text bound). Persisted to a new canonical side table
  `proposed_use_cases` keyed by PR number, mirrored onto the cache
  columns added by migration 021. Returned on the proposal list/detail,
  RFC detail (by slug), and PR detail endpoints.
- Display: ProposalView, RFCView (main only), and PRView render the
  captured use case with a muted "left blank" treatment when NULL.
- migration 021: nullable `proposed_use_case` on cached_rfcs/cached_prs
  plus the reconcile-proof `proposed_use_cases` truth table.
- New vertical test_proposed_use_case_vertical: persists+returns when
  supplied, accepted as NULL/omitted, for both surfaces.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-28 12:28:52 -07:00
Ben Stull 779ba6db59 Slice 1: scaffolding + propose-to-super-draft vertical
Brings the §1 bot wrapper, the §4 cache (webhook + reconciler), the
§5 schema (six numbered migrations), Gitea OAuth + §6 user
provisioning, the §7 catalog left pane, and the propose-to-merge
vertical: propose modal opens an idea PR against the meta repo, an
owner merges from the pending-idea view, the cache picks it up via
webhook or reconciler sweep, and the catalog renders the new
super-draft.

Per §1 the bot is the only Git writer; every commit, branch
creation, and PR merge carries the §6.5 On-behalf-of: trailer and
an `actions` audit row. Per §4 the cache is never written from a
user action — it's webhook+reconciler only.

Covered by `backend/tests/test_propose_vertical.py` against an
in-process Gitea simulator.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-24 04:31:11 -07:00