cbaba76345d28e639ac31424ca18864367e4df55
21 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
abd17a6cc8 |
feat(slice4): schema-driven metadata edit panel in RFCView (§22.4a PUC-1 §5.2)
MetadataFieldsPanel renders one control per declared field (enum→select, tags→chips, text→input), read-only without contribute access, saving changed values via saveEntryMeta (direct sidecar commit). Wired into the canonical main view, gated on the collection declaring fields (INV-5). saveEntryMeta API client added. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
9f548a340d |
§22 M3-backend Plan B (2/2, read path): per-project RFC serving (v0.37.0)
A second project's corpus now renders under /p/<id>/, isolated by its own
slug namespace. Completes step (1) "RFC app supports multiple projects" for
the read path.
- api.py: GET /api/projects/{pid}/rfcs (scoped catalog) + /{slug} (entry by
(project_id,slug)), behind the §22.5 read gate. Unscoped /api/rfcs stay as
default-project compat.
- cache.py: refresh_meta_repo iterates every projects row, mirroring each
content_repo into cached_rfcs stamped with its project_id (_upsert_cached_rfc
gains a project_id arg).
- frontend: api.listRFCs(projectId)/getRFC(projectId,slug); Catalog + RFCView
pass useProjectId(); ProjectLayout's NotServedPlaceholder guard removed (every
project serves), 404/not-readable branch kept; NotServedPlaceholder deleted.
- tests: test_project_scoped_serving.py (catalog scoping, entry isolation,
gated 404); ProjectLayout.test updated (non-default renders). 445 backend +
11 Vitest green; clean build.
Known limitation (next slice): write path + default-id re-stamp not yet scoped
(non-default project read-only); no live impact (no 2nd project in prod yet).
Per docs/superpowers/specs/2026-06-04-m3-backend-planb-design.md.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
|
999c4b65ef |
§22 M3 frontend: /p/<project>/ routing, runtime branding, directory, 308s (v0.35.0)
Implements the M3-frontend slice of the §22 multi-project track, per docs/superpowers/specs/2026-06-03-m3-frontend-design.md (design merged in #10). Completes the runtime-config cut 0.33.0 (M3-backend Plan A) began. Frontend: - DeploymentProvider boots GET /api/deployment → {name, tagline, defaultProjectId, projects}; brandTitle() neutral 'RFC' pre-fetch fallback. - /p/:projectId/* routing with generic /e/<slug> segment. ProjectLayout fetches /api/projects/:id, applies per-project theme (reset on switch), provides ProjectContext, guards the corpus (served only for the default; others get NotServedPlaceholder — decouples this slice from Plan B). - Directory at / (2+ projects) with N=1 redirect into the single project; ProjectSwitcher in deployment chrome; entry-noun by project type. - VITE_APP_NAME hard cut: removed from vite.config + index.html; the 6 brand reads now use deployment.name via context; static <title>RFC</title> + JS document.title. Internal /rfc·/proposals links → /p/<project>/e|proposals via lib/entryPaths. Backend: - GET /api/deployment returns default_project_id (the guard contract). - Server-side 308s: /rfc/<slug>, /rfc/<slug>/pr/<n>, /proposals/<n> → /p/<default>/… . nginx (testing + prod) routes /rfc/ and /proposals/ to the backend. Tests: 3 new backend redirect/deployment tests (438 pass); Vitest unit for DeploymentProvider, ProjectLayout (theme/guard/404), Directory (11 pass); clean build with no VITE_APP_NAME. Playwright e2e deferred until Tier-1 seeds a registry (see CHANGELOG 0.35.0 step 5). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
49ba06e0c2 |
§13: make graduation's RFC number optional; add retire (soft delete)
Optional number (§13.2/§13.3): GraduateBody.rfc_id is now optional.
A blank/absent id graduates to `active` with `id: null`, leaving the
slug as the canonical identifier (§2.3). /graduate/check treats a blank
id as valid (ok:true); /graduate only validates the RFC-NNNN regex +
collision check when a number is supplied. The Graduate dialog allows an
empty number and renders number-less entries by slug (no RFC-undefined).
Retire (§3, §3.1, §13.7): new `retired` soft-delete state. An RFC's own
owners (frontmatter) and site `owner`-role holders — not app admins —
retire via POST /api/rfcs/<slug>/retire, an auto-merged meta-repo flip
PR (graduation machinery reused). Retired entries leave every browsing
surface: catalog, get_rfc (404 except site owner), discussion/branch
reads. Un-retire is site-owner-only (POST .../unretire), discoverable
via the owner-gated GET /api/admin/retired-rfcs ("Retired" admin tab).
Migration 025 widens the cached_rfcs.state CHECK to include 'retired'
(table rebuild, all columns preserved).
Tests: graduation no-number cases (active+null id by slug; check accepts
blank) added to test_graduation_vertical.py; new test_retire_vertical.py
covers perms (owner/site-owner allowed, admin/contributor 403),
catalog/read exclusion, and a graduate→retire→unretire round-trip. Full
backend suite 386 passing; frontend builds clean. SPEC §3/§3.1/§13
updated; CHANGELOG + VERSION → 0.33.0.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
|
7c6c906db2 |
#26: optional proposed-use-case field on propose-RFC + propose-PR
Adds an optional "What will you be using this for?" capture as a sibling to the required justification on both propose surfaces, per roadmap #26. - propose-RFC modal (ProposeModal): optional textarea below the required "Why is this RFC needed?" pitch, labeled "What will you be using this RFC for? (optional)". - propose-PR modal (PRModal): optional textarea below the required description, labeled "What will you be using this change for?". - Backend: ProposeBody / OpenPRBody gain an optional `proposed_use_case` (NULL/omitted accepted, no min, 8000-char cap matching the existing free-text bound). Persisted to a new canonical side table `proposed_use_cases` keyed by PR number, mirrored onto the cache columns added by migration 021. Returned on the proposal list/detail, RFC detail (by slug), and PR detail endpoints. - Display: ProposalView, RFCView (main only), and PRView render the captured use case with a muted "left blank" treatment when NULL. - migration 021: nullable `proposed_use_case` on cached_rfcs/cached_prs plus the reconcile-proof `proposed_use_cases` truth table. - New vertical test_proposed_use_case_vertical: persists+returns when supplied, accepted as NULL/omitted, for both surfaces. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
ee4925b6ac |
Release 0.16.0: owner-only invite for per-RFC contribution + discussion (+ #21 Part C Amplitude wiring)
Wave 5 / Track B. Roadmap item #12. Folds in #21 Part C Amplitude
wiring inline (operator ask: "best practices from the very get-go").
RFC owners can invite specific users to one of two per-RFC roles:
contributor (open PRs + join discussion) or discussant (discussion
only). Non-invited users keep the v0.6.0 anonymous-read contract.
The per-RFC write gate layers on top of the existing
require_contributor gate; a super-draft with no owners yet falls
through to the platform-granted contract, preserving the
v0.6.0/v0.7.0/v0.8.0 contracts in their domains.
Backend: migration 018_rfc_invitations.sql (auto-applied — two
tables: rfc_invitations + rfc_collaborators); api_invitations.py
with five endpoints + transactional email; auth.py helpers
(is_rfc_owner / is_rfc_collaborator / can_discuss_rfc /
can_contribute_to_rfc / can_invite_to_rfc); api_discussion +
api_branches + api_prs gate composition; api_admin.py additive
rfc_invitations[] per user. 237 backend tests pass (18 new in
test_rfc_invitations_vertical.py).
Frontend: InvitationsModal.jsx (owner surface), AcceptInvitation.jsx
(/invitations/accept route), api.js helpers, RFCView.jsx
Invitations button, App.jsx route registration.
Amplitude wiring (inline, #21 Part C):
- INVITATION_SENT from InvitationsModal { rfc_slug, role_in_rfc }
- INVITATION_ACCEPTED from AcceptInvitation { rfc_slug, role_in_rfc }
- identify() BEFORE the accept event with properties: invited_at
(setOnce), last_invited_to_rfc, last_invite_role_in_rfc,
claim_method: 'rfc-invite'
- EVENTS taxonomy extended with INVITATION_SENT + INVITATION_ACCEPTED
No new secrets, no new overlay keys, no operator gesture beyond the
v0.15.0 overlay-set + restart. Frontend build verified green.
Subagent ν shipped the feature on feature/v0.16.0-owner-invite
(
|
||
|
|
72f8457933 |
Release 0.15.0: Amplitude Analytics + Session Replay (with #21 Part C identity lifecycle)
Wave 5 / Track A. Roadmap item #13. Folds in #21 Part C user-identity- lifecycle work inline rather than as a follow-up release (operator ask: "implement Amplitude best practices from the very get-go"). Wraps @amplitude/unified with: - consent-gated lazy init (v0.13.0 cookie banner; SDK never loads without explicit analytics opt-in) - amplitude.initAll(KEY, { analytics: { autocapture: true }, sessionReplay: { sampleRate: 1 } }) — vendor-recommended shape - identify({ user_id, properties? }) with set vs setOnce semantics - setUserProperties(properties) for mid-session state changes - anonymize() clears both user_id binding AND property cache Wired into App.jsx (identify on me.user with role / permission_state / passcode_set / device_trusted as set; first_sign_in_at / account_created_at as setOnce; Page Viewed on route change; Sign-out fires User Signed Out + anonymize), Login.jsx (User Signed In + Beta Access Requested), and the per-feature surfaces (ProposeModal, PRModal, RFCView, RFCDiscussionPanel, PRView, Admin). Binding: VITE_AMPLITUDE_API_KEY via `flotilla overlay set` (bundle-embedded public key like VITE_TURNSTILE_SITE_KEY — not secret). Mid-Session-L correction: original dispatch brief specified secret-set; vendor guidance + bundle visibility settled it as overlay. PII discipline: no email, no display_name, no gitea_login, no free-text fields ever sent. Properties are opaque ids + enums + timestamps + booleans only. Subagent ξ shipped the wrapper structure + nine-event taxonomy on feature/v0.15.0-amplitude ( |
||
|
|
c92730a737 |
Release 0.5.0: PR-less per-RFC discussion (contribution still requires PR)
Roadmap item #3. An RFC's main view now carries a discussion surface distinct from PR comments and from branch chat. The substrate is the existing threads/thread_messages tables — rows with branch_name IS NULL scope to the RFC's main view; the schema already permitted that shape, v0.5.0 is the first build to write it. Five new endpoints under /api/rfcs/<slug>/discussion/..., a new RFCDiscussionPanel right-column component used when branchParam === main, SPEC §10.10 settling discussion-vs-contribution, and §17 listing the new routes. Notification routing reuses the existing chat_message_in_participated_thread / chat_reply_to_my_message event kinds with branch_name=null on the fan-out row; a distinct event_kind is a §19.2 candidate. Anonymous viewers can read; writes require contributor — v0.6.0's item #4 will harden adjacent gates. No schema migration; minor bump, no operator action required beyond rebuild and restart. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
21fcbc92d4 |
Release 0.3.0: private-beta gate + anonymous read mode
Adds an email allowlist (toggleable per deployment) that restricts OAuth sign-in to listed emails while keeping read paths public. Anonymous visitors now see the full app shell in read-only mode instead of the §14.1 landing wall. Empty allowlist = gate off, so deployments that don't enable it behave exactly as 0.2.3. Also fixes single-finger scroll on /philosophy and other .chrome-pane views on iOS Safari (.app: 100vh → 100dvh). Renames deploy/nginx/rfc.wiggleverse.org.conf → ohm.wiggleverse.org.conf to match the deployed-domain rename (rfc.wiggleverse.org deprovisioned 2026-05-27). See CHANGELOG.md for full details + upgrade steps. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
46049d296b |
Contribute rewrite Phase 7: retire DiffView
The Phase 3 preview-pane inline overlay and Phase 4 raw-pane gutter accent together cover the review affordance DiffView was the interim home for, so the toolbar toggle collapses and the surface goes. - frontend/src/components/DiffView.jsx deleted. - RFCView.jsx: drop the DiffView + marked imports, the reviewMode / reviewHTML state, the toggleReviewMode callback, the "Review changes" toolbar button, and the reviewMode ternary in render. editorEditable simplifies to mode === 'contribute' && canContribute. File-header docstring updated: "DiffView" → "preview-pane tracked-change overlay (§8.10)". - App.css: remove the .diff-view-wrapper and .diff-view-empty rules; relabel the DiffView section header as ChangeTooltip (which lives on as the Phase 3 overlay's hover affordance). Drop the dead .editor- content .tiptap rules — Tiptap had no remaining consumers after DiffView's deletion. The Contribute toolbar still renders the accepted/pending hint + Phase 6 Chat toggle; only the Review-changes button is removed. - MarkdownPreview.jsx: comment updated to drop the DiffView mention from the scoped-Marked-instance rationale. - SPEC.md: §8.10 retitled "Tracked-change markup" (was "...and the review-mode toggle"); the legacy-DiffView paragraph rewritten as a one-sentence retirement note. §8.1, §8.15, §9.4, §9.5 references to DiffView / review-mode cleaned up. §19.2's persistent-accepted-change candidate updated to point at the preview-pane overlay rather than DiffView. No DiffView orphans remain (grep confirms .btn-review-toggle is still the Discuss-mode "Show tracked changes" toggle, ChangeTooltip and trackedOverlay carry historical comments only, PRView's §19.2 comment is unrelated). Frontend reload shows no console errors. Backend integration suite: 125 passed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
49e91f8829 |
Contribute rewrite Phase 6: narrow-viewport right-panel drawer
Below 1280px the right-panel (chat + change-card panel) collapses into an off-canvas drawer toggled from a Chat button in the editor toolbar. Above 1280px the inline three-column layout is unchanged. Replaces the Phase 2 narrow-viewport-banner stopgap. - drawerOpen useState in RFCView; per-session, default closed; tied to a .rfc-body.drawer-open class plus .right-panel.drawer-open and the backdrop's data-open attribute. - ChatDrawerToggleButton in each editor-toolbar branch (Contribute, Discuss-with-accepted-changes, and a narrow-only fallback toolbar for the default state). Badge mirrors change-panel-header: pending AI changes + the buffered manual card. Hidden above 1280px via CSS. - .right-panel becomes position: fixed; top: 48px; right: 0; width: min(420px, 92vw); transform: translateX(100%) by default; slides in with .drawer-open. Backdrop sibling with opacity transition handles click-to-close. - Escape closes the drawer when open (useEffect listener gated on drawerOpen, so it's a no-op when closed). - Toolbar gets padding-right shifted to drawer-width when the drawer is open at narrow widths so the toggle stays clickable to close (otherwise it'd sit under the open drawer). - @media (min-width: 1280px) restores .right-panel to inline flex (360px, position: static), hides the backdrop, hides the toggle button, and hides the narrow-only toolbar fallback. - Removes the .narrow-viewport-banner JSX + its CSS block + its @media display:none rule. SPEC.md §8.1 gains a paragraph noting the narrow-viewport drawer collapse — explicit acknowledgment that the three-column shape adapts below ~1280px without re-architecting around responsive primitives. Verified in Vite preview sandbox at 1024px (drawer offscreen, backdrop opacity 0, toggle visible) and 1440px (inline three-column, drawer fixed-positioning reset, toggle hidden, backdrop display:none). Backend was down this session (proxy 502 on /api/me) so the cumulative Phase 2–5 end-to-end verification gap is still open; sandbox proof only, as called out in the phase prompt. Backend integration suite: 125 passed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
4afb018bb0 |
Contribute rewrite Phase 5: inline word-diff in manual pending card
The §8.11 manual-edit card was a stub — "{N} paragraphs edited
directly" plus a countdown and a Save-now button. The spec says the
card should grow one inline word-diff per touched paragraph as the
contributor types, in the same green/red register the Phase 3 accepted
overlay uses. Phase 5 lands that.
In RFCView.jsx, the 800ms-debounced handleEditorUpdate now computes a
per-paragraph token diff alongside the existing paragraph count and
stores both on manualPending. Baseline is the same Phase 4 gutter
source — originalSourceLinesRef.current, the last server-confirmed
body split on blank lines — so the card resets to empty the same
moment the gutter clears (accept/decline/manualFlush/branch-switch).
In ChangePanel.jsx, diffWords is exported (it was already the AI
card's inline-diff engine — token-level LCS over a whitespace-
preserving /(\\s+)/ split, ~30 lines, no runtime dep). The manual
card consumes the same tokens. Wholly-inserted paragraphs render as
all-insert blocks; wholly-deleted paragraphs as all-delete blocks.
Visual register is intentionally shared with Phase 3's preview
overlay: same #dcfce7/#166534 inserts, same #fee2e2/#991b1b
strike-through deletes. Selectors are scoped under .change-manual-diff
rather than reusing .markdown-preview .tracked-* since the card lives
outside the preview surface.
Pre-fancy stance, matching Phase 4's gutter: the diff is index-aligned
against the baseline, so adding a paragraph in the middle lights up
the rest of the doc. Tolerated as the "you've touched stuff below this
point" cue. An LCS-anchored future pass can fix it.
Verification gap matching Phases 2/3/4: backend was not running this
session, so the live RFCView → real-branch flow wasn't exercised.
Drove the Vite preview sandbox instead — mounted ChangePanel with a
hand-built diffs payload, confirmed three blocks render (mixed edit,
wholly-inserted, wholly-deleted), inserts/deletes carry the expected
computed colors, no console errors. Backend integration suite still
green (125 passed).
|
||
|
|
2a7c099a33 |
Contribute rewrite Phase 3: tracked-change overlay in MarkdownPreview
Reintroduces the §8.10 inline tracked-change layer Phase 1 dropped when
Tiptap left, this time anchored to the rendered preview rather than a
writable editor. Each accepted change on the branch decorates the
preview DOM with a `<span class="tracked-insert">` at the proposed text
and a `<span class="tracked-delete">` strikethrough for the original;
hover surfaces the same ChangeTooltip DiffView uses (badge + prompt +
quote + reason), now extracted to its own file so both surfaces share
the affordance.
Design calls per the Phase 3 prompt's open list:
• Contribute pane: default-on. The pane exists for editorial review
of your own work; the overlay reinforces that.
• Discuss pane: opt-in via a new "Show tracked changes" toolbar
toggle on non-main branches. Clean prose stays the default.
• DiffView's "Review changes" toolbar is untouched — DiffView dies in
Phase 7 and overloading its toggle now creates surface to unwind.
Pre-fancy stance on the known overlay subtleties:
• Drift — if `proposed` no longer appears verbatim (later manual
edit touched it) we skip the decoration rather than mis-anchor.
• Overlap — decorate in `acted_at` ascending order; later spans win
on whatever text is still un-wrapped.
• Mermaid — text nodes inside `.mermaid-block` are skipped; a tracked
span that intersects diagram source drops silently. Flagged as a
known limitation rather than worked around.
• Code — `<pre>`/`<code>` parents skipped too; matching inside
verbatim code produced noisy false positives in fixtures.
Backend tests: 125 passed. Helper verified via Vite preview sandbox
eval across eight cases (single-paragraph match, distinct-original
strike, no-match skip, mermaid skip, two-change overlap ordering,
declined/pending ignored, whitespace-normalized cross-newline match,
code-block skip), plus computed-style proof for the new
`.markdown-preview .tracked-insert` / `.tracked-delete` rules. The
end-to-end CM6 → accept → overlay flow against a live branch wasn't
exercised (backend not running this session); the simpler unit-level
verification looked clean, but a future session with the backend up
should drive that golden path before Phase 4 piles on top.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
|
7c3b8fc133 |
Contribute rewrite Phase 2: split-pane preview with mermaid
Add a rendered preview pane and split the Contribute-mode center
column. Discuss mode is now a single rendered preview (no more
read-only Tiptap mount); Contribute mode renders the CM6 raw editor
on the left and a live-updating preview on the right at 50/50, with
the existing chat + change-card panels untouched on the right.
The new MarkdownPreview component renders markdown via marked and
lazy-loads mermaid on the first encounter of a ```mermaid fence in
any rendered doc. Mermaid (~200 KB gzipped, plus dagre/graphlib
subchunks) stays out of the main bundle and is fetched only when a
diagram actually appears in the rendered content. The marked
renderer is scoped via a per-component Marked instance so the
mermaid-fence behavior does not leak to Editor.jsx / DiffView.
XSS hardening on mermaid: securityLevel: 'strict' is set explicitly
in mermaid.initialize. Verified end-to-end via a sandbox eval — a
hostile `<script>window.X=true</script>` payload inside a mermaid
fence is neutralized (no script tags in the rendered SVG, no global
side-effect, diagram still renders with the offending node label
empty).
The §8.12 selection tooltip is now sourced from window.getSelection()
inside the preview surface rather than Tiptap PM positions. The
SelectionTooltip's existing `{text, coords}` contract is unchanged;
coords come from the selection range's bounding rect. Anchor payloads
for flag threads now carry just the quote text — the PM-position
from/to fields that the Tiptap-era code attached are dropped (they
were never meaningful as durable anchors anyway; quote is what §8.12
and §8.13 specify).
Design decisions confirmed before coding (all defaults):
- PromptBar spans both panes at the bottom of the center column; it
operates on the document, not on either pane individually.
- Start-Contributing is a hard cut — no transition animation. Phase
6's chat-drawer collapse will redo the layout machinery anyway.
- Mermaid lazy-loads on first ```mermaid fence detected, not on
Contribute-mode entry. Keeps the gzipped cost off any doc that has
no diagrams.
- Below 1280px viewport, a narrow-viewport banner surfaces in
Contribute mode. The drawer collapse that fixes this properly is
Phase 6.
Mermaid integration is kept loose for the future authoring tool: the
placeholder DOM node carries the source as a data attribute, the
renderer takes (source) → SVG via mermaid.render, and per-block
memoization keys on source. A future authoring pane can intercept
the placeholder before SVG render without restructuring.
SPEC §8.3 updated to reflect the split-pane Contribute layout — the
smallest edit that captures the new shape.
Verification notes:
- Vite preview on :5180 — sandbox mount of MarkdownPreview confirms
rendering, mermaid SVG output, securityLevel:'strict' XSS
neutralization, and the window.getSelection → {text, coords}
bridge end to end.
- Network log confirms mermaid + sub-chunks are absent from initial
load and fetched only after first ```mermaid encounter.
- Backend was not running this session, so the manual-debounce
save-now / accept / decline / live-preview-mirror pathways were
not driven against a real branch; they remain verified by
inspection. Phase 1's verification gap therefore carries forward.
- 125 backend integration tests still green.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
|
13d59b5d26 |
Contribute rewrite Phase 1: CM6 markdown source editor
Swap the Contribute-mode editing surface from Tiptap WYSIWYG to a CodeMirror 6 markdown source editor. Discuss mode and any read-only viewing continues to render through Tiptap. The §8.11 manual-edit debounce now reads the raw markdown source via CodeMirror's doc, eliminating the lossy `editor.getText()` round-trip that RFCView.jsx flagged as a §19.2 candidate; what the contributor typed is exactly what gets POSTed to manual flush. The §8.10 paragraph-margin gutter accent on Tiptap is dropped — it was dead in read-only Discuss anyway, and Phase 4 of the Contribute rewrite adds a change-anchored gutter against the CM6 raw pane. The Tiptap-side accept-time injection of <span class="tracked-*"> markup also drops out — CM6 can't render those spans, and Phase 3's preview pane is the proper home for tracked changes. The reviewMode / DiffView toggle still works against marked-rendered HTML in the interim until Phase 7 retires it. Notes: - Bundle gzipped grows ~50KB for CM6 modules (state/view/commands/ language/lang-markdown). Mermaid in Phase 2 will be the larger lift and should lazy-load. - Verified the CM6 editor mounts cleanly via Vite dev preview: ref handle (`view/getDoc/setDoc`) is wired, `onUpdate` fires on doc changes, gutter / line-numbers / active-line all render, and the source round-trips verbatim. Could not drive the full RFCView Contribute flow end-to-end without a running backend; the manual countdown + save-now + accept/decline pathways are verified by inspection only. - 125 backend integration tests still green. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
a255429e57 |
Post-v1: per-RFC model availability (UX half) folded into §6.6
First §19.2 candidate settled after v1. The heavier per-RFC-model
topic subdivided into UX (this) and credential delegation + funder
role (still §19.2). New §6.6 carries the rule: an optional `models:`
frontmatter field on the meta-repo RFC entry; absent inherits the
operator universe, populated narrows the picker to the intersection
with provisioned providers, `[]` opts the RFC out of AI entirely.
The first resolved entry is the RFC default. §18's ENABLED_MODELS is
reframed as the operator universe.
Code: migration 009 adds nullable cached_rfcs.models_json (NULL ≠ []
is load-bearing); entry.py grows the optional field with absent-vs-
empty round-tripping in parse/serialize; new models_resolver module
holds the rule; api_branches replaces /api/models with the slug-aware
/api/rfcs/{slug}/models and threads the chat + reask paths through
the resolver; api_prs §10.2 uses the resolver and extends the stub
fallback to the opt-out case; frontend passes slug to listModels.
Tests 106/106 green (96 prior + 10 in test_per_rfc_models.py). No
behavioral change for entries without `models:` — operator universe
preserved as default.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
|
1b0968a9a2 |
Slice 5: graduation per §13
The §13.3 transactional sequence flips a super-draft to active — five steps with paired undoes, an in-process orchestrator fed by an asyncio.Queue, the §17 SSE endpoint streaming step transitions to the dialog. Each step is a new bot primitive that logs an `actions` row, bracketed by `graduate_start` / `graduate_complete` for the linkable audit sequence. Rollback runs the undoes in reverse from the last completed step; merge_pr has no undo by design per §13.5. The §9.8 precondition gate is enforced server-side at the top of POST /graduate so the §13.3 rollback complexity does not grow. The §13.4 chat migration is a database semantic no-op — the (slug, branch_name='main') threads keep their identity, only the interpretation changes. The §9.8 pre-graduation history surfaces via a new _is_meta_target(rfc, branch) dispatch helper and lands as pre_graduation_history on /main. §13.1 claim flow landed alongside since it's the prerequisite for non-admin graduation — bot.open_claim_pr plus broadening api_prs._require_pr to accept meta_claim. 45/45 tests green; ten new integration tests cover the validator, the §9.8 precondition refusal, happy path with audit verification, mid-sequence rollback at steps 2 and 3, concurrent refusal, chat-survives-without-data-movement, pre-graduation history, and the §13.1 claim PR cycle. SPEC.md §19.1 rewritten for Slice 6 (notifications); §19.2 grew four candidates surfaced during the slice. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
4565a6cb95 |
Slice 4: super-draft body editing per §9.5 + §9.6
The §17 routing-collapse rule lands in api_branches.py and api_prs.py — every branches/<branch>/... and prs/<n>/... route dispatches on the entry's state to pick the right Gitea repo, and the body extracted from the entry's frontmatter envelope is what the editor and the diff see. The bot grows open_metadata_pr; cache grows refresh_meta_branches. Two §17 routes added: start-edit-branch and metadata. The §9.4 super-draft view replaces RFCView.jsx's Slice 2 placeholder; a metadata pane modal opens from the breadcrumb. Branch naming uses edit-<slug>-<6hex> to dodge the §19.2 path-routing candidate while preserving §9.5's structural shape. Covered by tests/test_super_draft_vertical.py (10 tests). The full Slices 1-4 suite is 35/35 green. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
a2bf89e90b |
Slice 3: the PR flow
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
3bc8fe92af |
Slice 2: the §8 active-RFC view in full
Per the §19.1 brief: the three-column shape (§8.1) opens on main
in discuss mode (§8.2), supports the §8.3 discuss-vs-contribute
flip on non-main branches, hosts §8.4's per-branch chat with AI
participation (§18's <change> protocol → §8.14 changes rows), the
§8.8 change-card panel with §8.9 accept/decline/edit-before-accept,
the §8.10 tracked-change markup + DiffView toggle, the §8.11
manual-edit flushes with the stale-change mechanic, the §8.12
range and paragraph sub-threads, the §8.13 flag affordance, and
the §8.14 discuss-mode buffer.
Backend: bot.py grew per-RFC-repo write ops (cut_branch_from_main,
commit_accepted_change with the structured original/proposed/reason
body and Change-Id + Source-Message-Id + On-behalf-of trailers,
commit_manual_flush, ensure_rfc_repo_seed). cache.py grew
refresh_rfc_repo and the webhook dispatches on repository.full_name.
providers.py and chat.py port the §18 carryovers — multi-provider
LLM abstraction and SSE-streaming chat against the §5 threads /
thread_messages / changes schema. api_branches.py mounts the §17
branches/<branch>/* and threads/<thread_id>/* routes with the §6
/ §11 permission checks inline.
Frontend: RFCView.jsx rebuilt as the §8 surface; Editor.jsx,
ChatPanel.jsx, ChangePanel.jsx, PromptBar.jsx, SelectionTooltip.jsx,
DiffView.jsx, ModelPicker.jsx, modelStyles.js lifted from the
prototype and adapted to the canonical schema.
Covered by `backend/tests/test_rfc_view_vertical.py` — eleven new
integration tests against an extended FakeGitea (PUT contents,
POST orgs/{org}/repos, seed_rfc_repo): main-view read,
promote-to-branch, accept (with and without edit-before-accept),
decline, manual flush + system message, flag creation, visibility
flip, anonymous read-but-no-contribute, stale-change refusal, and
the chat-streaming path with a fake provider injected. The 5
Slice 1 tests continue to pass alongside.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
|
779ba6db59 |
Slice 1: scaffolding + propose-to-super-draft vertical
Brings the §1 bot wrapper, the §4 cache (webhook + reconciler), the §5 schema (six numbered migrations), Gitea OAuth + §6 user provisioning, the §7 catalog left pane, and the propose-to-merge vertical: propose modal opens an idea PR against the meta repo, an owner merges from the pending-idea view, the cache picks it up via webhook or reconciler sweep, and the catalog renders the new super-draft. Per §1 the bot is the only Git writer; every commit, branch creation, and PR merge carries the §6.5 On-behalf-of: trailer and an `actions` audit row. Per §4 the cache is never written from a user action — it's webhook+reconciler only. Covered by `backend/tests/test_propose_vertical.py` against an in-process Gitea simulator. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |