Integrates the multi-project work so far — the §22 design drafts, M1 (the
schema spine), and M2 (project-scoped authorization + the §22.7 resolver) —
on top of the v0.32.0 retire/§13 changes that landed on main meanwhile.
Integration decisions:
- Renumbered the M1 projects migration 025_projects.sql -> 026_projects.sql.
v0.32.0 shipped 025_retired_state.sql, which rebuilds cached_rfcs and
predates the project_id column; running projects *after* the retire rebuild
is required so project_id survives on a fresh database (the runner applies
*.sql in filename order). Comment/doc references bumped to match.
- Resolved the get_rfc conflict in api.py by composing both gates: compute the
viewer once, apply the §22.5 visibility gate, then v0.32.0's §13.7
retired-entry owner-only check.
- api_graduation.py / api_discussion.py auto-merged cleanly (M2's threaded
viewer/visibility gate coexists with the new retire endpoints + retired
state).
Full suite 401 passed on a fresh DB.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Builds the three-tier authorization resolver on M1's schema spine: the
most-permissive union of deployment role (§6.1), project role (§22.6), and
per-RFC authority (§6.3/§12), with the §22.5 visibility gate subtractive on
top (§22.7). Pure app-layer — no migration (M1 shipped the tables), no
behavior change on the public default project. Verifiable on the single
default project by flipping its visibility and granting/revoking roles.
- app/auth.py: the §22.7 resolver primitives — project_visibility,
project_member_role, project_of_rfc, is_project_superuser, can_read_project,
effective write/discuss standing (can_contribute_in_project /
can_discuss_in_project), require_project_readable, visible_project_ids.
The three per-RFC capability helpers (can_discuss_rfc / can_contribute_to_rfc
/ can_invite_to_rfc) now compose all three tiers, so the ~20 call sites
inherit M2 unchanged.
- Read pass: the §22.5 visibility gate (404 to non-members) threaded into
every RFC-resolution helper across api.py / api_branches / api_prs /
api_graduation / api_discussion / api_contributions / api_invitations, plus
the catalog + proposals listings filtered by visible_project_ids.
- Write pass: the deep gates (branch read/contribute/owner, PR merge/withdraw/
edit, graduation, discussion resolve) fold in project_admin via
is_project_superuser; the "any-contributor" branch mode routes through
can_contribute_in_project; propose + claim gate on project contribute
standing. Deployment-level surfaces (admin idea-PR merge/decline, account
notification-mute) stay deployment-scoped.
- Operator decisions: implicit-on-public (a granted deployment contributor
keeps its pre-M2 write baseline on a public project, no membership row, so
the N=1 case stays whole) and preserve-curation (that baseline does not
override per-RFC owner curation — only an explicit project grant or a
deployment owner/admin does), keeping the v0.16.0 per-RFC invite contract
intact on public.
- tests: test_multi_project_authz_vertical.py — 9 vertical assertions on the
resolver tiers, public-unchanged regression, the gated 404 read gate, the
gated contribution gate, union + subtractive visibility, and revocation.
Full suite 390 passed.
- docs: mark Part C M2 "(landed)" with the two operator decisions.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Wave 5 / Track B. Roadmap item #12. Folds in #21 Part C Amplitude
wiring inline (operator ask: "best practices from the very get-go").
RFC owners can invite specific users to one of two per-RFC roles:
contributor (open PRs + join discussion) or discussant (discussion
only). Non-invited users keep the v0.6.0 anonymous-read contract.
The per-RFC write gate layers on top of the existing
require_contributor gate; a super-draft with no owners yet falls
through to the platform-granted contract, preserving the
v0.6.0/v0.7.0/v0.8.0 contracts in their domains.
Backend: migration 018_rfc_invitations.sql (auto-applied — two
tables: rfc_invitations + rfc_collaborators); api_invitations.py
with five endpoints + transactional email; auth.py helpers
(is_rfc_owner / is_rfc_collaborator / can_discuss_rfc /
can_contribute_to_rfc / can_invite_to_rfc); api_discussion +
api_branches + api_prs gate composition; api_admin.py additive
rfc_invitations[] per user. 237 backend tests pass (18 new in
test_rfc_invitations_vertical.py).
Frontend: InvitationsModal.jsx (owner surface), AcceptInvitation.jsx
(/invitations/accept route), api.js helpers, RFCView.jsx
Invitations button, App.jsx route registration.
Amplitude wiring (inline, #21 Part C):
- INVITATION_SENT from InvitationsModal { rfc_slug, role_in_rfc }
- INVITATION_ACCEPTED from AcceptInvitation { rfc_slug, role_in_rfc }
- identify() BEFORE the accept event with properties: invited_at
(setOnce), last_invited_to_rfc, last_invite_role_in_rfc,
claim_method: 'rfc-invite'
- EVENTS taxonomy extended with INVITATION_SENT + INVITATION_ACCEPTED
No new secrets, no new overlay keys, no operator gesture beyond the
v0.15.0 overlay-set + restart. Frontend build verified green.
Subagent ν shipped the feature on feature/v0.16.0-owner-invite
(a51beec). Driver-side integration squash-merged into main,
hand-resolved VERSION + package.json + CHANGELOG (strict-descending
0.16.0 → 0.15.0), and added the inline Amplitude wiring.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Replaces the v0.3.0 / v0.7.0 allowed_emails admission gate with an
admin-grant flow (roadmap item #6, SPEC §6.1 / §6.2 / §14.1 / §17).
Any valid email can sign in via OTC; a fresh user lands in
permission_state='pending' with a captured first/last/why profile,
and an admin grant flips them to 'granted' before write endpoints
accept them. Grandfathered users pass through the migration with
the column default 'granted' so existing contributors are unaffected.
The allowed_emails table stays in the schema as a fast-path bypass
pending v0.9.0's admin user-management page (item #7).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Replaces the Gitea OAuth gesture as the primary human-auth path
(roadmap item #5, SPEC §6.2). Users sign in by entering their email,
receiving a six-digit code via the existing SMTP layer, and entering
the code on a two-step /login surface. The Gitea OAuth callback
remains functional during migration — the new UI links to it as a
fallback for users with active OAuth sessions or older invite paths
— and is scheduled for removal in a future release once OTC adoption
is universal. Existing users are linked by email on first OTC sign-
in (gitea_id preserved); new users are provisioned with NULL
gitea_id and rely on email as the identity key. The migration
introduces backend/migrations/012_otc.sql (otc_codes table + users
schema rebuild for nullable gitea_id and a partial unique index on
email), two new endpoints (POST /auth/otc/request, POST /auth/otc/verify),
bcrypt as a new backend dependency for code hashing, and 11 new
tests in test_otc_vertical.py covering the happy path, expired and
consumed and wrong codes, the per-email rate limit, the allowlist
gate, the OAuth-era link path, fresh provisioning, and prior-code
invalidation on re-request. No new secrets are required — the
existing SECRET_KEY signs sessions and bcrypt's per-row salt covers
the code hashes.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds an email allowlist (toggleable per deployment) that restricts
OAuth sign-in to listed emails while keeping read paths public.
Anonymous visitors now see the full app shell in read-only mode
instead of the §14.1 landing wall. Empty allowlist = gate off, so
deployments that don't enable it behave exactly as 0.2.3.
Also fixes single-finger scroll on /philosophy and other .chrome-pane
views on iOS Safari (.app: 100vh → 100dvh).
Renames deploy/nginx/rfc.wiggleverse.org.conf →
ohm.wiggleverse.org.conf to match the deployed-domain rename
(rfc.wiggleverse.org deprovisioned 2026-05-27).
See CHANGELOG.md for full details + upgrade steps.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Brings the §1 bot wrapper, the §4 cache (webhook + reconciler), the
§5 schema (six numbered migrations), Gitea OAuth + §6 user
provisioning, the §7 catalog left pane, and the propose-to-merge
vertical: propose modal opens an idea PR against the meta repo, an
owner merges from the pending-idea view, the cache picks it up via
webhook or reconciler sweep, and the catalog renders the new
super-draft.
Per §1 the bot is the only Git writer; every commit, branch
creation, and PR merge carries the §6.5 On-behalf-of: trailer and
an `actions` audit row. Per §4 the cache is never written from a
user action — it's webhook+reconciler only.
Covered by `backend/tests/test_propose_vertical.py` against an
in-process Gitea simulator.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Ben Stull
Ben Stull