Commit Graph

2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Ben Stull a117fbb521 §22 M3-backend Plan B (1/2): slug-keyed PK rebuilds activate project #2 (v0.36.0)
Lands the table rebuilds migration 026 deferred until a second project exists,
shipped separately from per-project serving for migration hygiene. No behavior
change (deployments stay single-project 'default').

- migration 028_project_scoped_keys.sql: folds project_id into the slug-keyed
  PK/UNIQUE of 13 tables (cached_rfcs PK (slug)->(project_id,slug); the
  UNIQUE/PK on cached_branches, branch_visibility, branch_contribute_grants,
  stars, watches, pr_seen, branch_chat_seen, funder_consents, rfc_collaborators,
  contribution_requests, proposed_use_cases gain project_id) and makes the FKs
  to cached_rfcs on rfc_invitations/rfc_collaborators/contribution_requests
  composite (project_id, rfc_slug) -> cached_rfcs(project_id, slug).
- db.run_migrations: a `-- migrate:no-foreign-keys` migration runs with
  PRAGMA foreign_keys toggled OFF around it (required by SQLite's table-rebuild
  procedure) + foreign_key_check after, failing loudly on dangling refs.
- ON CONFLICT upsert targets for the rebuilt tables gain project_id so they
  match the new composite indexes (value still defaults to 'default').
- test_migration_028_project_scoped_keys.py: proves two-project same-slug
  coexistence, within-project uniqueness, composite-FK enforcement. 442 pass.
- design doc §2 marked shipped.

Per docs/superpowers/specs/2026-06-04-m3-backend-planb-design.md.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-04 06:30:37 -07:00
Ben Stull 779ba6db59 Slice 1: scaffolding + propose-to-super-draft vertical
Brings the §1 bot wrapper, the §4 cache (webhook + reconciler), the
§5 schema (six numbered migrations), Gitea OAuth + §6 user
provisioning, the §7 catalog left pane, and the propose-to-merge
vertical: propose modal opens an idea PR against the meta repo, an
owner merges from the pending-idea view, the cache picks it up via
webhook or reconciler sweep, and the catalog renders the new
super-draft.

Per §1 the bot is the only Git writer; every commit, branch
creation, and PR merge carries the §6.5 On-behalf-of: trailer and
an `actions` audit row. Per §4 the cache is never written from a
user action — it's webhook+reconciler only.

Covered by `backend/tests/test_propose_vertical.py` against an
in-process Gitea simulator.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-24 04:31:11 -07:00