Adds an optional "What will you be using this for?" capture as a sibling
to the required justification on both propose surfaces, per roadmap #26.
- propose-RFC modal (ProposeModal): optional textarea below the required
"Why is this RFC needed?" pitch, labeled "What will you be using this
RFC for? (optional)".
- propose-PR modal (PRModal): optional textarea below the required
description, labeled "What will you be using this change for?".
- Backend: ProposeBody / OpenPRBody gain an optional `proposed_use_case`
(NULL/omitted accepted, no min, 8000-char cap matching the existing
free-text bound). Persisted to a new canonical side table
`proposed_use_cases` keyed by PR number, mirrored onto the cache
columns added by migration 021. Returned on the proposal list/detail,
RFC detail (by slug), and PR detail endpoints.
- Display: ProposalView, RFCView (main only), and PRView render the
captured use case with a muted "left blank" treatment when NULL.
- migration 021: nullable `proposed_use_case` on cached_rfcs/cached_prs
plus the reconcile-proof `proposed_use_cases` truth table.
- New vertical test_proposed_use_case_vertical: persists+returns when
supplied, accepted as NULL/omitted, for both surfaces.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Wave 9 follow-up to roadmap item #30 (Session 0017.0 shipped #30 as v0.19.0;
v0.20.0 lands the operator-feedback follow-ups on top).
1. Specs on /docs/specs/<name> (backend docs_specs.py + frontend DocsSpec.jsx
+ DocsSpecsIndex.jsx). Configured via OHM_DOCS_SPECS; framework default
carries OHM's two specs (rfc-app/SPEC.md + flotilla SPEC.md). Runtime
fetch from gitea raw with 5-min TTL cache, mirroring docs_sessions.py.
2. Nested flyout nav hierarchy (DocsLayout.jsx). Sessions render as a tree
with transcripts nested under each session row (labeled by .N ordinal).
New Specs section between User Guide and Sessions.
3. /docs/sessions/<NNNN> body-list removed (DocsSessionIndex.jsx). Body
becomes a session-overview card; navigation lives in the left nav.
19 new pytest cases for docs_specs (332 backend total green). Frontend
build clean. Sync frontend/package-lock.json version drift (0.15.0 → 0.20.0)
alongside the VERSION + package.json bump.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Reorganizes the /docs surface from a single DOCS.md route into a hub
with a left-side flyout nav and three new sub-routes for the on-site
sessions browser (roadmap item #30):
/docs → redirect to /docs/user-guide
/docs/user-guide → existing DOCS.md content
/docs/sessions → redirect to /docs/sessions/about
/docs/sessions/about → README.md of ohm-session-history
/docs/sessions/<NNNN> → per-session transcript index
/docs/sessions/<NNNN>/<f> → per-transcript view
The flyout is a persistent left sidebar on desktop and a slide-out
drawer on mobile (toggled by a ☰ button in the docs header). Its
session list is driven by the /api/docs/sessions/manifest fetch —
loading shows a skeleton; 502 shows an inline retry; empty manifest
shows only the "About" row.
Each sub-route owns its own empty-state / error handling:
- 404 transcripts render "This transcript isn't published yet"
with a link back to the parent session index, no JS crash.
- 502 (gitea unreachable) renders a retry button.
- Manifest 404 is mapped to {} server-side so the flyout renders
cleanly with no error banner when no sessions are published yet.
Analytics (per SPEC §21):
- new EVENTS.DOC_VIEWED ("Doc Viewed") fires on each sub-route
mount with `section`: 'user-guide' | 'sessions/about' |
'sessions/<NNNN>' | 'sessions/<NNNN>/<filename>'.
- every interactive nav element carries aria-label +
data-amp-track-name so autocapture rows are readable.
The existing v0.14.0 Docs.jsx component is dropped — its content
moved verbatim into DocsUserGuide.jsx; the new layout subsumes the
back-button + signed-out home affordances it used to carry. All
four new sub-routes reuse the existing MarkdownPreview renderer
(marked + mermaid lazy-load) so no second markdown library lands.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Wave 5. Roadmap item #16. Folds in #21 Part C Amplitude wiring inline.
From the v0.9.0 /admin/users surface, an admin can create a fresh
users row, assign a role (admin/owner/granted-beta-user), include
an optional custom message, and dispatch an invite email carrying
a single-use opaque claim token (256-bit CSPRNG, bcrypt-at-rest,
7-day TTL). The invitee clicks through, lands at /invites/claim,
optionally checks "trust this device for 30 days", and is signed
in without going through OTC (the token in the email is itself
proof of email control).
Backend: migration 019_user_invite_tokens.sql (auto-applied);
backend/app/invites.py (create + claim + list module);
backend/app/email_invite.py (sibling of email_otc); POST
/api/admin/users + GET /api/admin/users/invites in api_admin;
POST /api/invites/claim in main.py's oauth_router (shares
trust-device cookie helper with /auth/otc/verify). 15 new tests in
test_admin_create_user_invite_vertical.py. permission_events row
with event_kind='user_invited' for the audit trail.
Frontend: Admin.jsx Create-user-invite modal + (pending invite)
badge in UserRow; InviteClaim.jsx /invites/claim landing page.
App.jsx route registration. api.js helpers.
Design choices documented in the CHANGELOG: immediate-send (no
admin-review queue); no bulk-invite (deferred); OTC skipped on
first sign-in (token = proof of email control); no users table
changes (discriminator is active user_invite_tokens row, not a
new first_sign_in_at column); refusal cases (self-invite 422,
duplicate email 409, non-owner admin granting owner 422).
Amplitude wiring (inline, #21 Part C):
- USER_INVITED from CreateUserInviteModal { target_user_id,
initial_role, custom_message_chars }
- INVITE_CLAIMED from InviteClaim { invited_by_admin_id,
initial_role, needs_passcode, trust_device }
- identify() BEFORE the claim event with properties:
claim_method 'admin-invite', invited_at (setOnce),
invited_by_admin_id (setOnce), initial_role (setOnce) —
so the Amplitude user record is created with the OHM
user_id from the very first event the invitee fires
Subagent ο shipped the feature on feature/v0.17.0-admin-create-user
(41b0c6a). Driver-side integration squash-merged into main,
hand-resolved 5 files (VERSION, package.json, CHANGELOG —
strict-descending to 0.17.0 → 0.16.0 → 0.15.0; App.jsx — both
new routes kept; api_admin.py — both per-user additive fields
+ pending-invite query both kept). Added inline Amplitude wiring
in CreateUserInviteModal + InviteClaim. 252 backend tests pass
(33 new across #12 + #16 surfaces). Frontend build verified green.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Wave 5 / Track B. Roadmap item #12. Folds in #21 Part C Amplitude
wiring inline (operator ask: "best practices from the very get-go").
RFC owners can invite specific users to one of two per-RFC roles:
contributor (open PRs + join discussion) or discussant (discussion
only). Non-invited users keep the v0.6.0 anonymous-read contract.
The per-RFC write gate layers on top of the existing
require_contributor gate; a super-draft with no owners yet falls
through to the platform-granted contract, preserving the
v0.6.0/v0.7.0/v0.8.0 contracts in their domains.
Backend: migration 018_rfc_invitations.sql (auto-applied — two
tables: rfc_invitations + rfc_collaborators); api_invitations.py
with five endpoints + transactional email; auth.py helpers
(is_rfc_owner / is_rfc_collaborator / can_discuss_rfc /
can_contribute_to_rfc / can_invite_to_rfc); api_discussion +
api_branches + api_prs gate composition; api_admin.py additive
rfc_invitations[] per user. 237 backend tests pass (18 new in
test_rfc_invitations_vertical.py).
Frontend: InvitationsModal.jsx (owner surface), AcceptInvitation.jsx
(/invitations/accept route), api.js helpers, RFCView.jsx
Invitations button, App.jsx route registration.
Amplitude wiring (inline, #21 Part C):
- INVITATION_SENT from InvitationsModal { rfc_slug, role_in_rfc }
- INVITATION_ACCEPTED from AcceptInvitation { rfc_slug, role_in_rfc }
- identify() BEFORE the accept event with properties: invited_at
(setOnce), last_invited_to_rfc, last_invite_role_in_rfc,
claim_method: 'rfc-invite'
- EVENTS taxonomy extended with INVITATION_SENT + INVITATION_ACCEPTED
No new secrets, no new overlay keys, no operator gesture beyond the
v0.15.0 overlay-set + restart. Frontend build verified green.
Subagent ν shipped the feature on feature/v0.16.0-owner-invite
(a51beec). Driver-side integration squash-merged into main,
hand-resolved VERSION + package.json + CHANGELOG (strict-descending
0.16.0 → 0.15.0), and added the inline Amplitude wiring.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Ships DOCS.md and the /docs route — a plain-prose translation of
SPEC.md for users, distinct from the binding spec. Originating need
was the admin-vs-owner role distinction on /admin/users (§6.1);
response is a single guide that covers the framework's user-facing
surfaces end-to-end (roles, proposing, branches, PRs, graduation,
notifications). Mirrors /philosophy: markdown file at repo root +
sibling backend loader + MarkdownPreview render. No schema migration.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
After a successful OTC sign-in, a contributor can set a passcode
(4-20 characters, bcrypt-hashed) and use email + passcode for
subsequent sign-ins. OTC remains the structural fallback: five
consecutive failed verifies lock the passcode path for 15 minutes
(HTTP 423), and a forgotten passcode is recovered by requesting a
fresh code. Migration 015_passcode.sql adds four nullable columns
to the users table; existing rows pass through as OTC-only and can
opt into a passcode from a new Sign-in tab in /settings/notifications.
The /login surface is extended to a five-step flow (email → either
passcode or OTC code → optional post-OTC passcode offer → optional
set-passcode). SPEC corrections per §19.3 rule 2: §6 names the
three auth paths, §14.1 documents the stepped login flow, §17 lists
the four new /auth/passcode/* endpoints, §19.2 surfaces four new
candidates and refreshes the cross-refs.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Replaces the v0.3.0 / v0.7.0 allowed_emails admission gate with an
admin-grant flow (roadmap item #6, SPEC §6.1 / §6.2 / §14.1 / §17).
Any valid email can sign in via OTC; a fresh user lands in
permission_state='pending' with a captured first/last/why profile,
and an admin grant flips them to 'granted' before write endpoints
accept them. Grandfathered users pass through the migration with
the column default 'granted' so existing contributors are unaffected.
The allowed_emails table stays in the schema as a fast-path bypass
pending v0.9.0's admin user-management page (item #7).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Roadmap item #11. Ships the non-modal bottom-of-page cookie consent
banner, the default /privacy and /cookies policy pages, the
`cookie_consent` table + two §17 endpoints for server-side persistence,
the localStorage fallback for anonymous viewers, the /settings
"Privacy & cookies" tab for revisiting the choice, and the
`frontend/src/lib/consent.js` helper that roadmap item #13's analytics
SDK (v0.15.0) will gate against. No analytics SDK ships in this release
— the consent infrastructure goes in first so the gate is already in
place. Adds SPEC §14.5 / §14.6, lists two new endpoints in §17, names
the new table in §5, and surfaces four §19.2 candidates (content-repo
file vs env-var policy, GPC / DNT headers, i18n, item-#13 dependency).
Two new optional env vars (`VITE_PRIVACY_POLICY_URL`,
`VITE_COOKIES_POLICY_URL`) — defaults render the framework's stub
pages.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Replaces the Gitea OAuth gesture as the primary human-auth path
(roadmap item #5, SPEC §6.2). Users sign in by entering their email,
receiving a six-digit code via the existing SMTP layer, and entering
the code on a two-step /login surface. The Gitea OAuth callback
remains functional during migration — the new UI links to it as a
fallback for users with active OAuth sessions or older invite paths
— and is scheduled for removal in a future release once OTC adoption
is universal. Existing users are linked by email on first OTC sign-
in (gitea_id preserved); new users are provisioned with NULL
gitea_id and rely on email as the identity key. The migration
introduces backend/migrations/012_otc.sql (otc_codes table + users
schema rebuild for nullable gitea_id and a partial unique index on
email), two new endpoints (POST /auth/otc/request, POST /auth/otc/verify),
bcrypt as a new backend dependency for code hashing, and 11 new
tests in test_otc_vertical.py covering the happy path, expired and
consumed and wrong codes, the per-email rate limit, the allowlist
gate, the OAuth-era link path, fresh provisioning, and prior-code
invalidation on re-request. No new secrets are required — the
existing SECRET_KEY signs sessions and bcrypt's per-row salt covers
the code hashes.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Roadmap item #3. An RFC's main view now carries a discussion surface
distinct from PR comments and from branch chat. The substrate is the
existing threads/thread_messages tables — rows with branch_name IS NULL
scope to the RFC's main view; the schema already permitted that shape,
v0.5.0 is the first build to write it. Five new endpoints under
/api/rfcs/<slug>/discussion/..., a new RFCDiscussionPanel right-column
component used when branchParam === main, SPEC §10.10 settling
discussion-vs-contribution, and §17 listing the new routes. Notification
routing reuses the existing chat_message_in_participated_thread /
chat_reply_to_my_message event kinds with branch_name=null on the
fan-out row; a distinct event_kind is a §19.2 candidate. Anonymous
viewers can read; writes require contributor — v0.6.0's item #4 will
harden adjacent gates. No schema migration; minor bump, no operator
action required beyond rebuild and restart.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds an email allowlist (toggleable per deployment) that restricts
OAuth sign-in to listed emails while keeping read paths public.
Anonymous visitors now see the full app shell in read-only mode
instead of the §14.1 landing wall. Empty allowlist = gate off, so
deployments that don't enable it behave exactly as 0.2.3.
Also fixes single-finger scroll on /philosophy and other .chrome-pane
views on iOS Safari (.app: 100vh → 100dvh).
Renames deploy/nginx/rfc.wiggleverse.org.conf →
ohm.wiggleverse.org.conf to match the deployed-domain rename
(rfc.wiggleverse.org deprovisioned 2026-05-27).
See CHANGELOG.md for full details + upgrade steps.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
First §19.2 candidate settled after v1. The heavier per-RFC-model
topic subdivided into UX (this) and credential delegation + funder
role (still §19.2). New §6.6 carries the rule: an optional `models:`
frontmatter field on the meta-repo RFC entry; absent inherits the
operator universe, populated narrows the picker to the intersection
with provisioned providers, `[]` opts the RFC out of AI entirely.
The first resolved entry is the RFC default. §18's ENABLED_MODELS is
reframed as the operator universe.
Code: migration 009 adds nullable cached_rfcs.models_json (NULL ≠ []
is load-bearing); entry.py grows the optional field with absent-vs-
empty round-tripping in parse/serialize; new models_resolver module
holds the rule; api_branches replaces /api/models with the slug-aware
/api/rfcs/{slug}/models and threads the chat + reask paths through
the resolver; api_prs §10.2 uses the resolver and extends the stub
fallback to the opt-out case; frontend passes slug to listModels.
Tests 106/106 green (96 prior + 10 in test_per_rfc_models.py). No
behavioral change for entries without `models:` — operator universe
preserved as default.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
§14.1 richer landing, §14.2 /philosophy route (disk-backed), §14.3
persistent About link. /settings/notifications surfaces Slice 6's
preferences/quiet-hours/mute/watches endpoints. /admin home base
consolidates role management, the §6.2 write-mute, the audit-log
viewer, the permission-events log, and the §13.2 graduation queue.
Backend: backend/app/philosophy.py, backend/app/api_admin.py (seven
admin endpoints + user-search), GET /api/users/me/notification-mutes.
Frontend: Landing.jsx (deck), Philosophy.jsx, NotificationSettings.jsx,
Admin.jsx, App.jsx routing for the chrome surfaces.
Tests: backend/tests/test_chrome_vertical.py — 13 cases. Full suite
75/75 green.
Spec corrections: §14.2 (PHILOSOPHY.md source is a deployment-time
decision), §17 (admin block extended to name the seven new endpoints
+ user-search and notification-mutes read). §19.1 rewritten for
Slice 8 hardening; §19.2 grew four candidates (owner succession,
mute-from-actor, the "Following since <date>" disclosure, audit-log
row prose).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The §13.3 transactional sequence flips a super-draft to active —
five steps with paired undoes, an in-process orchestrator fed by
an asyncio.Queue, the §17 SSE endpoint streaming step transitions
to the dialog. Each step is a new bot primitive that logs an
`actions` row, bracketed by `graduate_start` / `graduate_complete`
for the linkable audit sequence. Rollback runs the undoes in
reverse from the last completed step; merge_pr has no undo by
design per §13.5.
The §9.8 precondition gate is enforced server-side at the top of
POST /graduate so the §13.3 rollback complexity does not grow.
The §13.4 chat migration is a database semantic no-op — the
(slug, branch_name='main') threads keep their identity, only the
interpretation changes. The §9.8 pre-graduation history surfaces
via a new _is_meta_target(rfc, branch) dispatch helper and lands
as pre_graduation_history on /main.
§13.1 claim flow landed alongside since it's the prerequisite for
non-admin graduation — bot.open_claim_pr plus broadening
api_prs._require_pr to accept meta_claim.
45/45 tests green; ten new integration tests cover the validator,
the §9.8 precondition refusal, happy path with audit verification,
mid-sequence rollback at steps 2 and 3, concurrent refusal,
chat-survives-without-data-movement, pre-graduation history, and
the §13.1 claim PR cycle.
SPEC.md §19.1 rewritten for Slice 6 (notifications); §19.2 grew
four candidates surfaced during the slice.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The §17 routing-collapse rule lands in api_branches.py and
api_prs.py — every branches/<branch>/... and prs/<n>/... route
dispatches on the entry's state to pick the right Gitea repo, and
the body extracted from the entry's frontmatter envelope is what
the editor and the diff see. The bot grows open_metadata_pr;
cache grows refresh_meta_branches. Two §17 routes added:
start-edit-branch and metadata. The §9.4 super-draft view replaces
RFCView.jsx's Slice 2 placeholder; a metadata pane modal opens
from the breadcrumb. Branch naming uses edit-<slug>-<6hex> to
dodge the §19.2 path-routing candidate while preserving §9.5's
structural shape.
Covered by tests/test_super_draft_vertical.py (10 tests). The
full Slices 1-4 suite is 35/35 green.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Per the §19.1 brief: the three-column shape (§8.1) opens on main
in discuss mode (§8.2), supports the §8.3 discuss-vs-contribute
flip on non-main branches, hosts §8.4's per-branch chat with AI
participation (§18's <change> protocol → §8.14 changes rows), the
§8.8 change-card panel with §8.9 accept/decline/edit-before-accept,
the §8.10 tracked-change markup + DiffView toggle, the §8.11
manual-edit flushes with the stale-change mechanic, the §8.12
range and paragraph sub-threads, the §8.13 flag affordance, and
the §8.14 discuss-mode buffer.
Backend: bot.py grew per-RFC-repo write ops (cut_branch_from_main,
commit_accepted_change with the structured original/proposed/reason
body and Change-Id + Source-Message-Id + On-behalf-of trailers,
commit_manual_flush, ensure_rfc_repo_seed). cache.py grew
refresh_rfc_repo and the webhook dispatches on repository.full_name.
providers.py and chat.py port the §18 carryovers — multi-provider
LLM abstraction and SSE-streaming chat against the §5 threads /
thread_messages / changes schema. api_branches.py mounts the §17
branches/<branch>/* and threads/<thread_id>/* routes with the §6
/ §11 permission checks inline.
Frontend: RFCView.jsx rebuilt as the §8 surface; Editor.jsx,
ChatPanel.jsx, ChangePanel.jsx, PromptBar.jsx, SelectionTooltip.jsx,
DiffView.jsx, ModelPicker.jsx, modelStyles.js lifted from the
prototype and adapted to the canonical schema.
Covered by `backend/tests/test_rfc_view_vertical.py` — eleven new
integration tests against an extended FakeGitea (PUT contents,
POST orgs/{org}/repos, seed_rfc_repo): main-view read,
promote-to-branch, accept (with and without edit-before-accept),
decline, manual flush + system message, flag creation, visibility
flip, anonymous read-but-no-contribute, stale-change refusal, and
the chat-streaming path with a fake provider injected. The 5
Slice 1 tests continue to pass alongside.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Brings the §1 bot wrapper, the §4 cache (webhook + reconciler), the
§5 schema (six numbered migrations), Gitea OAuth + §6 user
provisioning, the §7 catalog left pane, and the propose-to-merge
vertical: propose modal opens an idea PR against the meta repo, an
owner merges from the pending-idea view, the cache picks it up via
webhook or reconciler sweep, and the catalog renders the new
super-draft.
Per §1 the bot is the only Git writer; every commit, branch
creation, and PR merge carries the §6.5 On-behalf-of: trailer and
an `actions` audit row. Per §4 the cache is never written from a
user action — it's webhook+reconciler only.
Covered by `backend/tests/test_propose_vertical.py` against an
in-process Gitea simulator.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Ben Stull