The `POST /api/webhooks/email-bounce` body accepts a new optional
`message_id` field. When supplied, the handler looks up the
matching row in `outbound_emails` and stamps status='bounced' +
appends "bounce (<kind>)" to the error column. The response
gains a `correlated_id` field (nullable: null when no
message_id was provided or no row matched).
Hard-bounce -> `email_opt_out_all = 1` still fires regardless
(the v1 contract from api_notifications.py:486-498); Slice 5
just adds the per-message audit trail on top.
Providers that don't surface Message-ID get the legacy v1
behavior — match by email, flip the global opt-out, leave
correlated_id null. Providers that replay an old bounce with a
message_id the framework no longer has log an INFO line but
still 200 (the bounce path can't refuse just because a row was
pruned).
Test update: `test_bounce_webhook_refuses_unsigned_when_secret_configured`
in test_e2e_smoke.py was asserting on the exact response shape
{ok, matched}; v0.18.0 adds `correlated_id`. The test now asserts
on the new shape; documented in CHANGELOG.
4 new tests covering: bounce with message_id stamps the row;
unknown message_id is logged + does not crash; bounce without
message_id still flips opt-out (backward compat); bounced rows
surface in the admin endpoint with `?status=bounced`.
Full suite: 295 passed.
Wave 5 / Track B. Roadmap item #12. Folds in #21 Part C Amplitude
wiring inline (operator ask: "best practices from the very get-go").
RFC owners can invite specific users to one of two per-RFC roles:
contributor (open PRs + join discussion) or discussant (discussion
only). Non-invited users keep the v0.6.0 anonymous-read contract.
The per-RFC write gate layers on top of the existing
require_contributor gate; a super-draft with no owners yet falls
through to the platform-granted contract, preserving the
v0.6.0/v0.7.0/v0.8.0 contracts in their domains.
Backend: migration 018_rfc_invitations.sql (auto-applied — two
tables: rfc_invitations + rfc_collaborators); api_invitations.py
with five endpoints + transactional email; auth.py helpers
(is_rfc_owner / is_rfc_collaborator / can_discuss_rfc /
can_contribute_to_rfc / can_invite_to_rfc); api_discussion +
api_branches + api_prs gate composition; api_admin.py additive
rfc_invitations[] per user. 237 backend tests pass (18 new in
test_rfc_invitations_vertical.py).
Frontend: InvitationsModal.jsx (owner surface), AcceptInvitation.jsx
(/invitations/accept route), api.js helpers, RFCView.jsx
Invitations button, App.jsx route registration.
Amplitude wiring (inline, #21 Part C):
- INVITATION_SENT from InvitationsModal { rfc_slug, role_in_rfc }
- INVITATION_ACCEPTED from AcceptInvitation { rfc_slug, role_in_rfc }
- identify() BEFORE the accept event with properties: invited_at
(setOnce), last_invited_to_rfc, last_invite_role_in_rfc,
claim_method: 'rfc-invite'
- EVENTS taxonomy extended with INVITATION_SENT + INVITATION_ACCEPTED
No new secrets, no new overlay keys, no operator gesture beyond the
v0.15.0 overlay-set + restart. Frontend build verified green.
Subagent ν shipped the feature on feature/v0.16.0-owner-invite
(a51beec). Driver-side integration squash-merged into main,
hand-resolved VERSION + package.json + CHANGELOG (strict-descending
0.16.0 → 0.15.0), and added the inline Amplitude wiring.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Five new integration test files raise the suite from 75 to 96 green:
test_hygiene_vertical (7), test_branch_path_routing (4),
test_metadata_pr_merge (3), test_cache_bootstrap (4), test_e2e_smoke
(3). The smoke test walks propose → super-draft → edit branch →
body-edit PR → graduate → active-RFC PR → merge → notification →
hygiene-sweep deletion end-to-end.
- deploy/RUNBOOK.md replaces the prior DEPLOY.md stub as a real
runbook: prerequisites, first-time bring-up, day-2 ops (logs, DB
backup, secret rotation, the §12 hygiene cadence), rollback shape,
troubleshooting table.
- backend/.env.example grows the SMTP block, HYGIENE_TICK_SECONDS,
and WEBHOOK_EMAIL_BOUNCE_SECRET with inline commentary.
- README points to RUNBOOK.md; the "what the build lets you do"
section adds Slices 7 and 8.
- docs/DEV.md gets a Slice 8 — shipped section; the "Next slice"
footer becomes the v1-complete epitaph.
- SPEC corrections per the §19.3 working agreement: §10.7 names the
shared §12 sweep; §12 names the bot as actuator and the per-user
branch_chat_seen preservation contract; §19.1 marks v1 complete
and records Slice 8; the five §19.2 candidates Slice 8 folded in
are marked settled with pointers at the resolution.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Ben Stull