Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Ben Stull fb9b4fa422 v0.24.0: Claude Haiku tag suggestions on propose-RFC (roadmap #27)
The §9.1 Slice-2 AI-suggested tag chips, deferred since the propose
modal landed, now wired up. As the propose-RFC draft fills in, the
backend asks Claude Haiku for tags drawn ONLY from the corpus's
existing tag set (the de-facto taxonomy — v1 tags are free-form chip
input, there is no curated list), surfaced as clickable suggestion
chips. Nothing auto-applies; the user clicks to add.

Backend:
- tag_suggest.py: universe gather (distinct corpus tags, most-common
  first), Haiku prompt + tolerant reply parser (drops invented tags,
  dedupes, clamps confidence), in-process per-user rate limit.
- providers.construct_haiku(): dedicated Haiku provider from the
  operator key, independent of ENABLED_MODELS — tag suggestion always
  uses the cheap+fast model. No RFC slug at propose time, so the §6.7
  funder path does not apply.
- POST /api/rfcs/suggest-tags: contributor-gated, rate-limited.
  Degrades to an empty list (never an error) when no Anthropic key is
  bound, the corpus has no tags, or the draft is empty.

Frontend:
- ProposeModal: debounced suggestion fetch (700ms, stale-response
  guarded), clickable suggestion chips, and the required inline
  disclosure that the draft text is sent to Anthropic.
- api.suggestTags(): forgiving — any non-OK resolves to [].

Tests: 11 new (vertical contributor-gating / filtering / no-key /
empty-corpus / 429, plus units for gather, parser tolerance, max,
short-circuit, provider-failure). Full suite 351 green.

New secret on deploy: ANTHROPIC_API_KEY (see CHANGELOG Upgrade steps).
Disclosure copy wants a counsel pass before deploy, per #22 discipline.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-28 13:25:39 -07:00
Ben Stull b3f1b15f65 Release 0.12.0: CloudFlare Turnstile on OTC email-entry 2026-05-28 03:52:45 -07:00
Ben Stull f8e797ab09 Release 0.7.0: email/OTC sign-in (Gitea OAuth retained as fallback)
Replaces the Gitea OAuth gesture as the primary human-auth path
(roadmap item #5, SPEC §6.2). Users sign in by entering their email,
receiving a six-digit code via the existing SMTP layer, and entering
the code on a two-step /login surface. The Gitea OAuth callback
remains functional during migration — the new UI links to it as a
fallback for users with active OAuth sessions or older invite paths
— and is scheduled for removal in a future release once OTC adoption
is universal. Existing users are linked by email on first OTC sign-
in (gitea_id preserved); new users are provisioned with NULL
gitea_id and rely on email as the identity key. The migration
introduces backend/migrations/012_otc.sql (otc_codes table + users
schema rebuild for nullable gitea_id and a partial unique index on
email), two new endpoints (POST /auth/otc/request, POST /auth/otc/verify),
bcrypt as a new backend dependency for code hashing, and 11 new
tests in test_otc_vertical.py covering the happy path, expired and
consumed and wrong codes, the per-email rate limit, the allowlist
gate, the OAuth-era link path, fresh provisioning, and prior-code
invalidation on re-request. No new secrets are required — the
existing SECRET_KEY signs sessions and bcrypt's per-row salt covers
the code hashes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-28 01:03:18 -07:00
Ben Stull 36635049c7 Slice 8: v1 ships — integration coverage, runbook, spec corrections
- Five new integration test files raise the suite from 75 to 96 green:
  test_hygiene_vertical (7), test_branch_path_routing (4),
  test_metadata_pr_merge (3), test_cache_bootstrap (4), test_e2e_smoke
  (3). The smoke test walks propose → super-draft → edit branch →
  body-edit PR → graduate → active-RFC PR → merge → notification →
  hygiene-sweep deletion end-to-end.
- deploy/RUNBOOK.md replaces the prior DEPLOY.md stub as a real
  runbook: prerequisites, first-time bring-up, day-2 ops (logs, DB
  backup, secret rotation, the §12 hygiene cadence), rollback shape,
  troubleshooting table.
- backend/.env.example grows the SMTP block, HYGIENE_TICK_SECONDS,
  and WEBHOOK_EMAIL_BOUNCE_SECRET with inline commentary.
- README points to RUNBOOK.md; the "what the build lets you do"
  section adds Slices 7 and 8.
- docs/DEV.md gets a Slice 8 — shipped section; the "Next slice"
  footer becomes the v1-complete epitaph.
- SPEC corrections per the §19.3 working agreement: §10.7 names the
  shared §12 sweep; §12 names the bot as actuator and the per-user
  branch_chat_seen preservation contract; §19.1 marks v1 complete
  and records Slice 8; the five §19.2 candidates Slice 8 folded in
  are marked settled with pointers at the resolution.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-25 04:14:50 -07:00
Ben Stull 779ba6db59 Slice 1: scaffolding + propose-to-super-draft vertical
Brings the §1 bot wrapper, the §4 cache (webhook + reconciler), the
§5 schema (six numbered migrations), Gitea OAuth + §6 user
provisioning, the §7 catalog left pane, and the propose-to-merge
vertical: propose modal opens an idea PR against the meta repo, an
owner merges from the pending-idea view, the cache picks it up via
webhook or reconciler sweep, and the catalog renders the new
super-draft.

Per §1 the bot is the only Git writer; every commit, branch
creation, and PR merge carries the §6.5 On-behalf-of: trailer and
an `actions` audit row. Per §4 the cache is never written from a
user action — it's webhook+reconciler only.

Covered by `backend/tests/test_propose_vertical.py` against an
in-process Gitea simulator.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-24 04:31:11 -07:00