Splits the original §22 two-tier model (deployment → project=corpus) into
three tiers (deployment → project → RFC collection). Project owns one
content repo; collections are typed subfolders declared by .collection.yaml
manifests (git-truth). Reconciles the accumulated role vocabulary onto one
{owner, contributor} enum attached at {global, project, collection}, with
downward additive inheritance and no negative override. Adds BDD scenarios
(Part C) for role usage, invitation, and empty states. Re-slots the roadmap
to fold the tier into the not-yet-shipped Plan B (mig 028) + M3-frontend.
Session 0072 (spec). Revises docs/design/multi-project-spec.md §22.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Lands the table rebuilds migration 026 deferred until a second project exists,
shipped separately from per-project serving for migration hygiene. No behavior
change (deployments stay single-project 'default').
- migration 028_project_scoped_keys.sql: folds project_id into the slug-keyed
PK/UNIQUE of 13 tables (cached_rfcs PK (slug)->(project_id,slug); the
UNIQUE/PK on cached_branches, branch_visibility, branch_contribute_grants,
stars, watches, pr_seen, branch_chat_seen, funder_consents, rfc_collaborators,
contribution_requests, proposed_use_cases gain project_id) and makes the FKs
to cached_rfcs on rfc_invitations/rfc_collaborators/contribution_requests
composite (project_id, rfc_slug) -> cached_rfcs(project_id, slug).
- db.run_migrations: a `-- migrate:no-foreign-keys` migration runs with
PRAGMA foreign_keys toggled OFF around it (required by SQLite's table-rebuild
procedure) + foreign_key_check after, failing loudly on dangling refs.
- ON CONFLICT upsert targets for the rebuilt tables gain project_id so they
match the new composite indexes (value still defaults to 'default').
- test_migration_028_project_scoped_keys.py: proves two-project same-slug
coexistence, within-project uniqueness, composite-FK enforcement. 442 pass.
- design doc §2 marked shipped.
Per docs/superpowers/specs/2026-06-04-m3-backend-planb-design.md.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The blueprint for the next §22 slice after M3-frontend (v0.35.0): make a
second project's corpus actually serve + render. Pins the three things that
land together — the default-project-id re-stamp (§22.13 step 1), the deferred
slug-keyed PK/UNIQUE rebuilds (migration 026 header, 12 tables), and
per-project RFC serving (path-scoped endpoints + per-project cache/bot/webhook
dispatch + scoped frontend calls + guard removal). Notes the Tier-1 registry
seed as the shared unblock for both this slice's and M3-frontend's deferred
e2e. Target v0.36.0 (possibly split B-1 read / B-2 write).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Frontend half of §22 M3, paired with the M3-backend spec. /p/<project>/ routing
(BrowserRouter + nested Routes + DeploymentProvider/ProjectLayout), N=1 redirect,
the VITE_APP_NAME->runtime hard cut (brandTitle fallback), per-project theme
overlay, real server-side 308 redirects, deployment directory + project switcher.
Scope boundary: corpus calls stay unscoped (default project only) with a guard
placeholder for non-served projects; second-project content is gated on Plan B.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds the bite-sized TDD implementation plan for Plan A (registry mirror +
runtime-config APIs + initial_state/unreviewed semantics; additive only).
Refines the spec with two planning discoveries: the re-stamp must be a
Python startup step (pure SQL can't read DEFAULT_PROJECT_ID), and the
PK-rebuild blast radius justifies splitting M3-backend into Plan A (this)
and Plan B (rebuild + project_id threading + re-stamp, before M4).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Bite-sized TDD plan for the Tier-1 local-Docker test foundation: Vitest
frontend-unit setup, a four-service docker compose stack (seeded real
disposable Gitea + backend + nginx SPA + Mailpit), and a Playwright e2e
harness (BASE_URL + Mailpit mail-sink) with one OTC-login smoke spec.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Bite-sized TDD plan for the Tier-1 local-Docker test foundation: Vitest
frontend-unit setup, a four-service docker compose stack (seeded real
disposable Gitea + backend + nginx SPA + Mailpit), and a Playwright e2e
harness (BASE_URL + Mailpit mail-sink) with one OTC-login smoke spec.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Brainstormed design for the backend half of §22 slice M3, split at the
backend/frontend seam. Covers migration 027 (type/initial_state columns,
the 12-table PK rebuilds, default→slug re-stamp), the app/registry.py
mirror over REGISTRY_REPO, GET /api/deployment + /api/projects/:id, and
the initial_state/unreviewed review semantics. Routing, runtime branding,
directory, and switcher are deferred to a later M3-frontend spec.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Brainstormed design for §22 slice M3 (registry mirror + routing + runtime
branding). Decomposes M3 into a §10.3 Tier-1 test/local-env foundation
(M3-0) plus four sequential feature sub-plans (M3a migration+restamp, M3b
registry mirror, M3c routing+redirects+branding, M3d landing-state/review).
Records resolved decisions: hard-cut branding, §4.1 reconciler pattern,
Stage-1 forward-only migration latitude with a future expand/contract note.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Integrates the multi-project work so far — the §22 design drafts, M1 (the
schema spine), and M2 (project-scoped authorization + the §22.7 resolver) —
on top of the v0.32.0 retire/§13 changes that landed on main meanwhile.
Integration decisions:
- Renumbered the M1 projects migration 025_projects.sql -> 026_projects.sql.
v0.32.0 shipped 025_retired_state.sql, which rebuilds cached_rfcs and
predates the project_id column; running projects *after* the retire rebuild
is required so project_id survives on a fresh database (the runner applies
*.sql in filename order). Comment/doc references bumped to match.
- Resolved the get_rfc conflict in api.py by composing both gates: compute the
viewer once, apply the §22.5 visibility gate, then v0.32.0's §13.7
retired-entry owner-only check.
- api_graduation.py / api_discussion.py auto-merged cleanly (M2's threaded
viewer/visibility gate coexists with the new retire endpoints + retired
state).
Full suite 401 passed on a fresh DB.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Builds the three-tier authorization resolver on M1's schema spine: the
most-permissive union of deployment role (§6.1), project role (§22.6), and
per-RFC authority (§6.3/§12), with the §22.5 visibility gate subtractive on
top (§22.7). Pure app-layer — no migration (M1 shipped the tables), no
behavior change on the public default project. Verifiable on the single
default project by flipping its visibility and granting/revoking roles.
- app/auth.py: the §22.7 resolver primitives — project_visibility,
project_member_role, project_of_rfc, is_project_superuser, can_read_project,
effective write/discuss standing (can_contribute_in_project /
can_discuss_in_project), require_project_readable, visible_project_ids.
The three per-RFC capability helpers (can_discuss_rfc / can_contribute_to_rfc
/ can_invite_to_rfc) now compose all three tiers, so the ~20 call sites
inherit M2 unchanged.
- Read pass: the §22.5 visibility gate (404 to non-members) threaded into
every RFC-resolution helper across api.py / api_branches / api_prs /
api_graduation / api_discussion / api_contributions / api_invitations, plus
the catalog + proposals listings filtered by visible_project_ids.
- Write pass: the deep gates (branch read/contribute/owner, PR merge/withdraw/
edit, graduation, discussion resolve) fold in project_admin via
is_project_superuser; the "any-contributor" branch mode routes through
can_contribute_in_project; propose + claim gate on project contribute
standing. Deployment-level surfaces (admin idea-PR merge/decline, account
notification-mute) stay deployment-scoped.
- Operator decisions: implicit-on-public (a granted deployment contributor
keeps its pre-M2 write baseline on a public project, no membership row, so
the N=1 case stays whole) and preserve-curation (that baseline does not
override per-RFC owner curation — only an explicit project grant or a
deployment owner/admin does), keeping the v0.16.0 per-RFC invite contract
intact on public.
- tests: test_multi_project_authz_vertical.py — 9 vertical assertions on the
resolver tiers, public-unchanged regression, the gated 404 read gate, the
gated contribution gate, union + subtractive visibility, and revocation.
Full suite 390 passed.
- docs: mark Part C M2 "(landed)" with the two operator decisions.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Default project id: config-derived slug (DEFAULT_PROJECT_ID > slug of
deployment name > 'default'); M1's 'default' bootstrap is re-stamped in M3
before any /p/ URL is public, so it's meaningful (/p/ohm/) and never renamed
live. §22.13.
- Entry-noun in URLs: generic /p/<project>/e/<slug> for every type; the noun
(RFC/Spec/Feature) is a type-driven UI label, not in the path. §22.10.
- Existing RFC-NNNN: kept as a frozen, read-only legacy display label in
frontmatter id (preserves citations); never used for lookup, never assigned
to new entries. §22.4, §2.3 amended.
Threads through §22.4/22.10/22.13, the §2.3 amendment, and the M3 slice.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Extends the §22 multi-project draft along four axes decided this session:
- Project type — each project declares document | specification | bdd
(immutable, registry-set). One shared propose→branch→PR→graduate engine;
type only layers entry schema, terminology, and type-specific surfaces
(spec release-planning, BDD scenarios/coverage). §22.4a.
- Slug-only identity — an entry is (project_id, slug); the per-project
RFC-NNNN numbering and its allocator are retired. §22.4, §2.3/§13 amended.
- initial_state — per-project landing state for a new entry: super-draft
(document/spec default) or active (bdd default). §22.4b.
- unreviewed flag — entries that skip straight to active land unreviewed;
graduation implies review so the normal path is never flagged. Owner
mark-reviewed clears it; §7 catalog gains an unreviewed filter; mirrored
into cached_rfcs. §22.4c.
Slicing plan re-sliced six→seven: type/initial_state/unreviewed config ride
M3, type surfaces become M5, membership→M6, hardening→M7.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Lays the additive foundation for hosting N projects per deployment, with
today's single corpus as the N=1 case. No behavior change: the app runs
exactly as before, single project, with the spine underneath.
- migration 025: `projects` + `project_members` tables; seed the `default`
project (visibility=public, preserving open-by-default); thread
`project_id NOT NULL DEFAULT 'default'` onto all 19 slug-bearing tables,
backfilling existing rows. Additive — no table rebuilds; the slug-keyed
uniqueness/PK rework is enumerated in the migration header and deferred to
the slice that activates project #2.
- app/projects.py: §22.13 startup backfill of the default project's
content_repo from META_REPO (idempotent — never clobbers a value the
future registry mirror sets).
- config: REGISTRY_REPO wired (optional through M1; consumed by the M3
mirror), documented in .env.example as META_REPO's successor.
- tests: 6 vertical assertions on the spine (seed, backfill, column shape,
role CHECK, idempotency, config). Full suite 381 passed.
- docs: align Part C M1/M3 boundaries with the landed code (registry mirror
+ redirect move to M3).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Design for hosting N projects (corpora) per deployment, with today's
single-corpus deployment as the N=1 case. Captures the locked decisions
(git registry, gated-by-default visibility, per-project RFC numbering),
the three-tier role model (deployment / project / per-RFC), and the
forced runtime-branding shift off VITE_APP_NAME.
- multi-project.md: rationale, decisions, operator (flotilla) integration.
- multi-project-spec.md: draft binding §22, in-place amendments to
§§1,2,5,6,7,8,13,14,17,18,20, and a six-slice (M1-M6) build plan.
Registry lives in a deployment-side repo the framework reads via a new
REGISTRY_REPO env var (META_REPO's multi-project successor); confirmed
against the ohm-rfc-app-flotilla spec — no operator-tooling change needed.
Not yet merged into SPEC.md or versioned; folds in when M1 lands.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds an email allowlist (toggleable per deployment) that restricts
OAuth sign-in to listed emails while keeping read paths public.
Anonymous visitors now see the full app shell in read-only mode
instead of the §14.1 landing wall. Empty allowlist = gate off, so
deployments that don't enable it behave exactly as 0.2.3.
Also fixes single-finger scroll on /philosophy and other .chrome-pane
views on iOS Safari (.app: 100vh → 100dvh).
Renames deploy/nginx/rfc.wiggleverse.org.conf →
ohm.wiggleverse.org.conf to match the deployed-domain rename
(rfc.wiggleverse.org deprovisioned 2026-05-27).
See CHANGELOG.md for full details + upgrade steps.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Fix §13.3 step 4 race against Gitea's async mergeability
computation: gitea.wait_for_mergeable polls the mergeable
field before calling merge, and bot._merge_with_retry rides
out the transient 'Please try again later' response.
- Frontend now requires VITE_APP_NAME at build time
(frontend/vite.config.js fails the build if unset). Header
brand, landing H1, and browser title read the deployment's
configured name.
- Establish framework versioning: VERSION (canonical) +
frontend/package.json#version mirror; CHANGELOG.md as the
release log with RFC 2119 / 8174 normative-language
upgrade-steps; SPEC.md §20 as the binding policy; CLAUDE.md
capturing the separation-of-concerns rule; docs/DEPLOYMENTS.md
as the downstream operating manual; docs/QUICKSTART-VISION.md
staking the future one-command-deploy capability.
- Surgical fix to SPEC.md opening so the spec no longer asserts
OHM is the corpus the framework produces.
- SPEC.md §19.2 gains the 'Deployment-supplied subject framing'
candidate that drives the 0.3.0 release.
SPEC, DEV docs, and code comments still talked about the codebase as
a rewrite-in-progress against an external prototype. With v1 shipped
the framing reads oddly — it implies code is provisional when it's
the production thing. Recast §18 as "the technical stack," strip
"carryover from the prototype" comments across backend (api.py,
chat.py, providers.py) and frontend (DiffView, PromptBar,
SelectionTooltip, modelStyles), and rework SPEC §1 / §18 to introduce
OHM up front rather than as a follow-on to a prototype reference.
Also:
- RUNBOOK: bump Python prereq to 3.11+ to match the production VM
(was 3.13).
- Remove IMPLEMENTATION-PROMPT.md — the original implementation brief
is no longer load-bearing.
- Add deploy/DEPLOY-NEW-SESSION-PROMPT.md as the durable
deploy-handoff prompt for new sessions.
Second §19.2 settlement after v1. New §6.7 alongside §6.6: optional
`funder:` frontmatter field names a single gitea_login; a
`funder_consents` app-db row records funder-side opt-in; both halves
required for the binding to activate (two-key rule). Funder universe
replaces — does not augment — the operator universe per-RFC for
attribution-clean resolution. Funder role grants zero §6.1/§6.3
authority. Three revocation paths each restore the operator-credentials
status quo.
§19.2's credential-delegation entry is split: lighter half marked
settled with a pointer to §6.7; operational-realities half (mid-call
failure, rotation, billing, rate-limit attribution) lives on as its
own entry. Test suite is 125/125 green (106 prior + 19 new).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
First §19.2 candidate settled after v1. The heavier per-RFC-model
topic subdivided into UX (this) and credential delegation + funder
role (still §19.2). New §6.6 carries the rule: an optional `models:`
frontmatter field on the meta-repo RFC entry; absent inherits the
operator universe, populated narrows the picker to the intersection
with provisioned providers, `[]` opts the RFC out of AI entirely.
The first resolved entry is the RFC default. §18's ENABLED_MODELS is
reframed as the operator universe.
Code: migration 009 adds nullable cached_rfcs.models_json (NULL ≠ []
is load-bearing); entry.py grows the optional field with absent-vs-
empty round-tripping in parse/serialize; new models_resolver module
holds the rule; api_branches replaces /api/models with the slug-aware
/api/rfcs/{slug}/models and threads the chat + reask paths through
the resolver; api_prs §10.2 uses the resolver and extends the stub
fallback to the opt-out case; frontend passes slug to listModels.
Tests 106/106 green (96 prior + 10 in test_per_rfc_models.py). No
behavioral change for entries without `models:` — operator universe
preserved as default.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Five new integration test files raise the suite from 75 to 96 green:
test_hygiene_vertical (7), test_branch_path_routing (4),
test_metadata_pr_merge (3), test_cache_bootstrap (4), test_e2e_smoke
(3). The smoke test walks propose → super-draft → edit branch →
body-edit PR → graduate → active-RFC PR → merge → notification →
hygiene-sweep deletion end-to-end.
- deploy/RUNBOOK.md replaces the prior DEPLOY.md stub as a real
runbook: prerequisites, first-time bring-up, day-2 ops (logs, DB
backup, secret rotation, the §12 hygiene cadence), rollback shape,
troubleshooting table.
- backend/.env.example grows the SMTP block, HYGIENE_TICK_SECONDS,
and WEBHOOK_EMAIL_BOUNCE_SECRET with inline commentary.
- README points to RUNBOOK.md; the "what the build lets you do"
section adds Slices 7 and 8.
- docs/DEV.md gets a Slice 8 — shipped section; the "Next slice"
footer becomes the v1-complete epitaph.
- SPEC corrections per the §19.3 working agreement: §10.7 names the
shared §12 sweep; §12 names the bot as actuator and the per-user
branch_chat_seen preservation contract; §19.1 marks v1 complete
and records Slice 8; the five §19.2 candidates Slice 8 folded in
are marked settled with pointers at the resolution.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
§14.1 richer landing, §14.2 /philosophy route (disk-backed), §14.3
persistent About link. /settings/notifications surfaces Slice 6's
preferences/quiet-hours/mute/watches endpoints. /admin home base
consolidates role management, the §6.2 write-mute, the audit-log
viewer, the permission-events log, and the §13.2 graduation queue.
Backend: backend/app/philosophy.py, backend/app/api_admin.py (seven
admin endpoints + user-search), GET /api/users/me/notification-mutes.
Frontend: Landing.jsx (deck), Philosophy.jsx, NotificationSettings.jsx,
Admin.jsx, App.jsx routing for the chrome surfaces.
Tests: backend/tests/test_chrome_vertical.py — 13 cases. Full suite
75/75 green.
Spec corrections: §14.2 (PHILOSOPHY.md source is a deployment-time
decision), §17 (admin block extended to name the seven new endpoints
+ user-search and notification-mutes read). §19.1 rewritten for
Slice 8 hardening; §19.2 grew four candidates (owner succession,
mute-from-actor, the "Following since <date>" disclosure, audit-log
row prose).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The §13.3 transactional sequence flips a super-draft to active —
five steps with paired undoes, an in-process orchestrator fed by
an asyncio.Queue, the §17 SSE endpoint streaming step transitions
to the dialog. Each step is a new bot primitive that logs an
`actions` row, bracketed by `graduate_start` / `graduate_complete`
for the linkable audit sequence. Rollback runs the undoes in
reverse from the last completed step; merge_pr has no undo by
design per §13.5.
The §9.8 precondition gate is enforced server-side at the top of
POST /graduate so the §13.3 rollback complexity does not grow.
The §13.4 chat migration is a database semantic no-op — the
(slug, branch_name='main') threads keep their identity, only the
interpretation changes. The §9.8 pre-graduation history surfaces
via a new _is_meta_target(rfc, branch) dispatch helper and lands
as pre_graduation_history on /main.
§13.1 claim flow landed alongside since it's the prerequisite for
non-admin graduation — bot.open_claim_pr plus broadening
api_prs._require_pr to accept meta_claim.
45/45 tests green; ten new integration tests cover the validator,
the §9.8 precondition refusal, happy path with audit verification,
mid-sequence rollback at steps 2 and 3, concurrent refusal,
chat-survives-without-data-movement, pre-graduation history, and
the §13.1 claim PR cycle.
SPEC.md §19.1 rewritten for Slice 6 (notifications); §19.2 grew
four candidates surfaced during the slice.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The §17 routing-collapse rule lands in api_branches.py and
api_prs.py — every branches/<branch>/... and prs/<n>/... route
dispatches on the entry's state to pick the right Gitea repo, and
the body extracted from the entry's frontmatter envelope is what
the editor and the diff see. The bot grows open_metadata_pr;
cache grows refresh_meta_branches. Two §17 routes added:
start-edit-branch and metadata. The §9.4 super-draft view replaces
RFCView.jsx's Slice 2 placeholder; a metadata pane modal opens
from the breadcrumb. Branch naming uses edit-<slug>-<6hex> to
dodge the §19.2 path-routing candidate while preserving §9.5's
structural shape.
Covered by tests/test_super_draft_vertical.py (10 tests). The
full Slices 1-4 suite is 35/35 green.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Per the §19.1 brief: the three-column shape (§8.1) opens on main
in discuss mode (§8.2), supports the §8.3 discuss-vs-contribute
flip on non-main branches, hosts §8.4's per-branch chat with AI
participation (§18's <change> protocol → §8.14 changes rows), the
§8.8 change-card panel with §8.9 accept/decline/edit-before-accept,
the §8.10 tracked-change markup + DiffView toggle, the §8.11
manual-edit flushes with the stale-change mechanic, the §8.12
range and paragraph sub-threads, the §8.13 flag affordance, and
the §8.14 discuss-mode buffer.
Backend: bot.py grew per-RFC-repo write ops (cut_branch_from_main,
commit_accepted_change with the structured original/proposed/reason
body and Change-Id + Source-Message-Id + On-behalf-of trailers,
commit_manual_flush, ensure_rfc_repo_seed). cache.py grew
refresh_rfc_repo and the webhook dispatches on repository.full_name.
providers.py and chat.py port the §18 carryovers — multi-provider
LLM abstraction and SSE-streaming chat against the §5 threads /
thread_messages / changes schema. api_branches.py mounts the §17
branches/<branch>/* and threads/<thread_id>/* routes with the §6
/ §11 permission checks inline.
Frontend: RFCView.jsx rebuilt as the §8 surface; Editor.jsx,
ChatPanel.jsx, ChangePanel.jsx, PromptBar.jsx, SelectionTooltip.jsx,
DiffView.jsx, ModelPicker.jsx, modelStyles.js lifted from the
prototype and adapted to the canonical schema.
Covered by `backend/tests/test_rfc_view_vertical.py` — eleven new
integration tests against an extended FakeGitea (PUT contents,
POST orgs/{org}/repos, seed_rfc_repo): main-view read,
promote-to-branch, accept (with and without edit-before-accept),
decline, manual flush + system message, flag creation, visibility
flip, anonymous read-but-no-contribute, stale-change refusal, and
the chat-streaming path with a fake provider injected. The 5
Slice 1 tests continue to pass alongside.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Brings the §1 bot wrapper, the §4 cache (webhook + reconciler), the
§5 schema (six numbered migrations), Gitea OAuth + §6 user
provisioning, the §7 catalog left pane, and the propose-to-merge
vertical: propose modal opens an idea PR against the meta repo, an
owner merges from the pending-idea view, the cache picks it up via
webhook or reconciler sweep, and the catalog renders the new
super-draft.
Per §1 the bot is the only Git writer; every commit, branch
creation, and PR merge carries the §6.5 On-behalf-of: trailer and
an `actions` audit row. Per §4 the cache is never written from a
user action — it's webhook+reconciler only.
Covered by `backend/tests/test_propose_vertical.py` against an
in-process Gitea simulator.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Ben Stull
Ben Stull