Reframe the Open Human Model in SPEC.md and PHILOSOPHY.md from "the
first RFC the framework will produce" to "the corpus of RFCs the
framework produces, of which the first defines *human*." Earlier
phrasing collapsed the project (OHM) and the first entry into one
name; this teases them apart.
Also surface the OpenXML APIs / UX downstream-consumer point: OHM is
English-first by design — the markdown bodies are canonical, and the
structured artifacts downstream systems need to actually let humans
and machines interact are derived from that English source, not
authored alongside it. This is part of why markdown round-trip
fidelity matters structurally (cf. the Phase 1 CM6 swap).
Updates the obvious example renames — slug `open-human-model` →
`human`, title "Open Human Model" → "Human", PR-list / breadcrumb /
notification examples — so the SPEC's worked-example consistently
shows OHM-as-corpus with Human as a member. Test fixtures and the
README seed-script invocation still carry the old slug; those are
left for a separate pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Brings the §1 bot wrapper, the §4 cache (webhook + reconciler), the
§5 schema (six numbered migrations), Gitea OAuth + §6 user
provisioning, the §7 catalog left pane, and the propose-to-merge
vertical: propose modal opens an idea PR against the meta repo, an
owner merges from the pending-idea view, the cache picks it up via
webhook or reconciler sweep, and the catalog renders the new
super-draft.
Per §1 the bot is the only Git writer; every commit, branch
creation, and PR merge carries the §6.5 On-behalf-of: trailer and
an `actions` audit row. Per §4 the cache is never written from a
user action — it's webhook+reconciler only.
Covered by `backend/tests/test_propose_vertical.py` against an
in-process Gitea simulator.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Ben Stull