Release 0.16.0: owner-only invite for per-RFC contribution + discussion (+ #21 Part C Amplitude wiring)
Wave 5 / Track B. Roadmap item #12. Folds in #21 Part C Amplitude
wiring inline (operator ask: "best practices from the very get-go").
RFC owners can invite specific users to one of two per-RFC roles:
contributor (open PRs + join discussion) or discussant (discussion
only). Non-invited users keep the v0.6.0 anonymous-read contract.
The per-RFC write gate layers on top of the existing
require_contributor gate; a super-draft with no owners yet falls
through to the platform-granted contract, preserving the
v0.6.0/v0.7.0/v0.8.0 contracts in their domains.
Backend: migration 018_rfc_invitations.sql (auto-applied — two
tables: rfc_invitations + rfc_collaborators); api_invitations.py
with five endpoints + transactional email; auth.py helpers
(is_rfc_owner / is_rfc_collaborator / can_discuss_rfc /
can_contribute_to_rfc / can_invite_to_rfc); api_discussion +
api_branches + api_prs gate composition; api_admin.py additive
rfc_invitations[] per user. 237 backend tests pass (18 new in
test_rfc_invitations_vertical.py).
Frontend: InvitationsModal.jsx (owner surface), AcceptInvitation.jsx
(/invitations/accept route), api.js helpers, RFCView.jsx
Invitations button, App.jsx route registration.
Amplitude wiring (inline, #21 Part C):
- INVITATION_SENT from InvitationsModal { rfc_slug, role_in_rfc }
- INVITATION_ACCEPTED from AcceptInvitation { rfc_slug, role_in_rfc }
- identify() BEFORE the accept event with properties: invited_at
(setOnce), last_invited_to_rfc, last_invite_role_in_rfc,
claim_method: 'rfc-invite'
- EVENTS taxonomy extended with INVITATION_SENT + INVITATION_ACCEPTED
No new secrets, no new overlay keys, no operator gesture beyond the
v0.15.0 overlay-set + restart. Frontend build verified green.
Subagent ν shipped the feature on feature/v0.16.0-owner-invite
(a51beec). Driver-side integration squash-merged into main,
hand-resolved VERSION + package.json + CHANGELOG (strict-descending
0.16.0 → 0.15.0), and added the inline Amplitude wiring.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ import pytest
|
||||
from test_propose_vertical import ( # noqa: F401
|
||||
FakeGitea,
|
||||
app_with_fake_gitea,
|
||||
grant_rfc_collaborator,
|
||||
provision_user_row,
|
||||
sign_in_as,
|
||||
tmp_env,
|
||||
@@ -131,6 +132,11 @@ def test_full_user_lifecycle_propose_through_hygiene(app_with_fake_gitea):
|
||||
assert d["repo"] == "wiggleverse/rfc-0001-ohm"
|
||||
|
||||
# --- 8. Alice opens a PR on the now-active RFC's per-RFC repo. ---
|
||||
# v0.16.0 (item #12): ben is the RFC owner now; alice needs a
|
||||
# per-RFC contributor invitation to cut a branch. In the
|
||||
# production flow, ben would invite her via /invitations and
|
||||
# she'd accept; we shortcut to the same end-state.
|
||||
grant_rfc_collaborator(user_id=2, rfc_slug="ohm", role_in_rfc="contributor")
|
||||
sign_in_as(client, user_id=2, gitea_login="alice",
|
||||
display_name="Alice", role="contributor", email="alice@test")
|
||||
r = client.post("/api/rfcs/ohm/branches/main/promote-to-branch", json={})
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user