fix(§22/G-15): make the branch/edit/body subsystem three-tier aware (v0.53.0)
§22 migrated the READ/catalog path to the three-tier (project/collection)
model but the WRITE/branch/body subsystem still hardcoded the default
project's default collection — resolving every meta-resident entry to the
default content repo at rfcs/<slug>.md, ignoring the entry's project (its own
content repo) and collection (a <subfolder>/rfcs/ prefix). An entry outside
the default collection rendered a blank canonical body and every edit/PR/
body-write path hit the wrong file.
- New single resolver: projects.content_repo_for_collection() +
projects.entry_location(config, cid, slug) -> (org, repo, md_path)
(collection -> project -> content_repo + subfolder; falls back to the
default repo for a legacy/unknown collection).
- Every entry write/read path resolves via it: api_branches (body GET + all
branch write paths), api_prs (pr-draft/open/merge/withdraw/review/
resolution-branch), api_graduation (graduate/claim/retire/unretire +
orchestrator + state-flip), api.py mark-reviewed + idea-PR merge/decline/
withdraw + proposal preview, api_metadata. bot.open_metadata_pr and
bot.mark_entry_reviewed gained a file_path param. refresh_meta_branches,
the webhook corpus-refresh dispatch, and the hygiene branch-delete now
span every project's content repo, not just the default.
- New additive collection-scoped body-read routes:
GET /api/projects/{pid}/collections/{cid}/rfcs/{slug}/main and
.../branches/{branch} disambiguate a slug across collections (G-5) and read
the entry's own repo. Slug-only routes kept (now collection-aware via the
cached row). Frontend getRFCMain/getBranch take optional pid+cid; RFCView
threads them (mirrors the v0.52.1 entry-detail fix).
No migration, no config change. Existing default-collection entries
unaffected. Tests: backend resolver + collection-scoped branch/body + graduate-
in-subfolder write path; frontend api unit. backend 677 / frontend 60 green.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
+65
-53
@@ -426,73 +426,85 @@ async def refresh_meta_branches(config: Config, gitea: Gitea) -> None:
|
||||
of slashes per the §19.2 path-routing candidate.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
org = config.gitea_org
|
||||
repo = projects_mod.default_content_repo(config)
|
||||
if not repo:
|
||||
log.warning("refresh_meta_branches: default project has no content_repo yet; skipping")
|
||||
return
|
||||
try:
|
||||
branches = await gitea.list_branches(org, repo)
|
||||
except GiteaError as e:
|
||||
log.warning("refresh_meta_branches: %s", e)
|
||||
# §22/G-15: scan EVERY project's content_repo (not just the default), so an
|
||||
# entry in a non-default project gets its edit branches + synthesized `main`
|
||||
# row cached and its branch dropdown / has-commits-ahead check work. Mirrors
|
||||
# refresh_meta_pulls' per-project loop.
|
||||
prows = db.conn().execute(
|
||||
"SELECT id, content_repo FROM projects WHERE content_repo IS NOT NULL AND content_repo != ''"
|
||||
).fetchall()
|
||||
if not prows:
|
||||
log.warning("refresh_meta_branches: no projects with a content_repo yet; skipping")
|
||||
return
|
||||
|
||||
meta_main_sha = ""
|
||||
meta_main_ts = None
|
||||
edit_keys_seen: set[tuple[str, str]] = set()
|
||||
for b in branches:
|
||||
name = b.get("name") or ""
|
||||
head_sha = (b.get("commit") or {}).get("id") or ""
|
||||
last_commit_at = (b.get("commit") or {}).get("timestamp")
|
||||
if name == "main":
|
||||
meta_main_sha = head_sha
|
||||
meta_main_ts = last_commit_at
|
||||
for prow in prows:
|
||||
repo = prow["content_repo"]
|
||||
try:
|
||||
branches = await gitea.list_branches(org, repo)
|
||||
except GiteaError as e:
|
||||
log.warning("refresh_meta_branches: %s (%s)", e, repo)
|
||||
continue
|
||||
slug = _slug_from_branch_name(name)
|
||||
if not slug:
|
||||
continue
|
||||
rfc = db.conn().execute(
|
||||
"SELECT state, repo FROM cached_rfcs WHERE slug = ?", (slug,)
|
||||
).fetchone()
|
||||
# Meta-only topology (§1): edit branches live on the meta repo for
|
||||
# every meta-resident entry — super-drafts and active RFCs alike
|
||||
# (active RFCs are graduated in place and keep editing here, §13).
|
||||
# A legacy per-RFC repo (repo set) is the only thing excluded.
|
||||
if not rfc or rfc["repo"] or rfc["state"] not in ("super-draft", "active"):
|
||||
continue
|
||||
edit_keys_seen.add((slug, name))
|
||||
db.conn().execute(
|
||||
"""
|
||||
INSERT INTO cached_branches (rfc_slug, branch_name, head_sha, state, last_commit_at)
|
||||
VALUES (?, ?, ?, 'open', ?)
|
||||
ON CONFLICT(collection_id, rfc_slug, branch_name) DO UPDATE SET
|
||||
head_sha = excluded.head_sha,
|
||||
state = CASE WHEN cached_branches.state = 'closed' THEN 'closed' ELSE 'open' END,
|
||||
last_commit_at = excluded.last_commit_at
|
||||
""",
|
||||
(slug, name, head_sha, last_commit_at),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Synthesize a per-slug `main` row for every super-draft entry, so the
|
||||
# §10.1 has-commits-ahead check in api_prs.py works uniformly. The
|
||||
# head_sha is the meta-repo main's tip — every super-draft edit branch
|
||||
# diverges from this single point.
|
||||
if meta_main_sha:
|
||||
super_drafts = db.conn().execute(
|
||||
"SELECT slug FROM cached_rfcs "
|
||||
"WHERE repo IS NULL AND state IN ('super-draft', 'active')"
|
||||
).fetchall()
|
||||
for r in super_drafts:
|
||||
meta_main_sha = ""
|
||||
meta_main_ts = None
|
||||
for b in branches:
|
||||
name = b.get("name") or ""
|
||||
head_sha = (b.get("commit") or {}).get("id") or ""
|
||||
last_commit_at = (b.get("commit") or {}).get("timestamp")
|
||||
if name == "main":
|
||||
meta_main_sha = head_sha
|
||||
meta_main_ts = last_commit_at
|
||||
continue
|
||||
slug = _slug_from_branch_name(name)
|
||||
if not slug:
|
||||
continue
|
||||
rfc = db.conn().execute(
|
||||
"SELECT state, repo FROM cached_rfcs WHERE slug = ?", (slug,)
|
||||
).fetchone()
|
||||
# Meta-only topology (§1): edit branches live on the content repo for
|
||||
# every meta-resident entry — super-drafts and active RFCs alike
|
||||
# (active RFCs are graduated in place and keep editing here, §13).
|
||||
# A legacy per-RFC repo (repo set) is the only thing excluded.
|
||||
if not rfc or rfc["repo"] or rfc["state"] not in ("super-draft", "active"):
|
||||
continue
|
||||
edit_keys_seen.add((slug, name))
|
||||
db.conn().execute(
|
||||
"""
|
||||
INSERT INTO cached_branches (rfc_slug, branch_name, head_sha, state, last_commit_at)
|
||||
VALUES (?, 'main', ?, 'open', ?)
|
||||
VALUES (?, ?, ?, 'open', ?)
|
||||
ON CONFLICT(collection_id, rfc_slug, branch_name) DO UPDATE SET
|
||||
head_sha = excluded.head_sha,
|
||||
state = CASE WHEN cached_branches.state = 'closed' THEN 'closed' ELSE 'open' END,
|
||||
last_commit_at = excluded.last_commit_at
|
||||
""",
|
||||
(r["slug"], meta_main_sha, meta_main_ts),
|
||||
(slug, name, head_sha, last_commit_at),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Synthesize a per-slug `main` row for this project's super-draft/active
|
||||
# entries, so the §10.1 has-commits-ahead check works uniformly. The
|
||||
# head_sha is this content repo's main tip — every edit branch in the
|
||||
# project diverges from that single point.
|
||||
if meta_main_sha:
|
||||
super_drafts = db.conn().execute(
|
||||
"SELECT r.slug AS slug FROM cached_rfcs r "
|
||||
"JOIN collections c ON c.id = r.collection_id "
|
||||
"WHERE r.repo IS NULL AND r.state IN ('super-draft', 'active') "
|
||||
" AND c.project_id = ?",
|
||||
(prow["id"],),
|
||||
).fetchall()
|
||||
for r in super_drafts:
|
||||
db.conn().execute(
|
||||
"""
|
||||
INSERT INTO cached_branches (rfc_slug, branch_name, head_sha, state, last_commit_at)
|
||||
VALUES (?, 'main', ?, 'open', ?)
|
||||
ON CONFLICT(collection_id, rfc_slug, branch_name) DO UPDATE SET
|
||||
head_sha = excluded.head_sha,
|
||||
last_commit_at = excluded.last_commit_at
|
||||
""",
|
||||
(r["slug"], meta_main_sha, meta_main_ts),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Mark previously-known edit branches that disappeared as deleted per
|
||||
# §11.5 / §12. Keep the row so chat history survives the branch's
|
||||
# deletion in Gitea.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user