Release 0.17.0: admin-create user + invite email (custom message; claim-link claim flow)

Roadmap item #16 / §6.1. From the v0.9.0 /admin/users surface, an
admin can now create a user record before that person has ever
signed in — typing first name, last name, email, role, and an
optional custom message — and the framework sends an invite email
carrying a single-use claim link. The invitee clicks through to
/invites/claim?token=…, the token is consumed, the session is
established, and the user is routed to the passcode-set screen on
first sign-in.

New endpoints:
  * POST /api/admin/users — admin-only; provisions the users row +
    user_invite_tokens row + sends the invite email + writes a
    permission_events row with event_kind='user_invited'.
  * GET  /api/admin/users/invites — admin-only; lists active
    (not-claimed, not-expired) invites with the issuing admin.
  * POST /api/invites/claim — anonymous-reachable; validates the
    token, consumes the row, signs the invitee in (skipping OTC
    per the roadmap — clicking the email link is itself proof of
    email control), returns needs_passcode for the frontend's
    route-onward decision.

Schema: migration slot 019 — user_invite_tokens (id, email, role,
first/last name, custom_message, bcrypt token_hash, expires_at,
created_at, created_by_admin_id, claimed_at, claimed_by_user_id,
invited_user_id). Slot 018 reserved for the parallel #12 release
(per-RFC invitation) shipping in the same wave; distinct table
(rfc_invitations there vs. user_invite_tokens here) so they
coexist cleanly. No users-table changes — the brief floated a
NULL-column discriminator for "(pending invite)" but the existing
users.last_seen_at is NOT NULL with a datetime('now') default, so
the discriminator is the active user_invite_tokens row joined on
invited_user_id; the admin user-listing carries a pending_invite
field populated via that join.

Claim route: frontend /invites/claim?token=… (new
InviteClaim.jsx). Anonymous-reachable; renders "Claim my account"
CTA with an optional v0.11.0-style "trust this device" checkbox,
calls the claim endpoint, routes onward.

Token shape: opaque DB token (256 bits CSPRNG via
secrets.token_urlsafe(32), bcrypt-at-rest), not JWT. Opaque
chosen because admin revocation is then a single SQL UPDATE — JWT
would be stateless but harder to invalidate.

Open-question decisions: immediate-send (no admin-review-then-
send queue; future enhancement), no bulk-invite (deferred to
follow-up; v0.17.0 is one-at-a-time), 7-day expiry as a constant
(INVITE_TOKEN_TTL_DAYS in backend/app/invites.py; env-var
configurability is a §19.2 candidate), OTC skipped on first
sign-in (the token in the email is itself proof of email control;
subsequent sign-ins go through OTC / passcode unchanged).

Refusals on POST /api/admin/users:
  * 422 self-invite (use the role-change channel for self-edits)
  * 409 duplicate email (use the existing grant/role gestures)
  * 422 owner-grant by non-owner admin (§6.1 owner-zero is the
    only owner bootstrap path)
  * 422 pydantic — malformed email / unknown role /
    custom_message > 500 chars
  * 403 non-admin caller / 401 anonymous

15 new backend tests in test_admin_create_user_invite_vertical.py
(happy path, all four refusals, claim with valid / expired /
already-claimed / unknown token, pending-invite badge before and
after claim, listing admin-only). 234 total backend tests pass;
frontend build succeeds.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Ben Stull
2026-05-28 04:48:02 -07:00
parent b3f1b15f65
commit 41b0c6af99
13 changed files with 2268 additions and 4 deletions
+136
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
"""Outbound admin-invite email — a thin wrapper over the existing SMTP layer.
v0.17.0 / roadmap item #16: when an admin uses `POST /api/admin/users` to
create-with-invite, this module composes and sends the invite envelope.
Structurally distinct from:
* `email_otc.py` (v0.7.0) — that one carries a credential the user
just requested; this one carries a credential the admin is sending
unsolicited.
* `email.py` (§15.4 notification mailer) — that one is inbox-driven,
bundled, with category opt-outs; this one is a single transactional
outbound to a person who does not yet have an inbox.
* v0.9.0's `new_beta_request` admin notification — that one is
invitee-to-admin (an existing pending user asking to be let in);
this one is admin-to-invitee (an admin reaching out to seed access).
So this module reuses `EmailConfig.from_env()` for the SMTP plumbing
and the From identity, but writes its own envelope. In dev (no
SMTP_HOST set), the envelope is logged at INFO level and pushed to
the same `_SENT` buffer the notification mailer uses, so the
integration tests can assert on the outbound shape without standing
up an SMTP server.
The send is synchronous. The admin endpoint returns 200 on the
create-row half regardless of send outcome — a transient SMTP
failure should not roll back the invite (an admin can re-send via a
future "resend invite" gesture, deferred to a follow-up release).
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import logging
import smtplib
from email.message import EmailMessage
from email.utils import formataddr
from .email import EmailConfig, _SENT
log = logging.getLogger(__name__)
def send_invite_email(
*,
to_address: str,
claim_url: str,
inviter_display: str,
inviter_email: str,
custom_message: str = "",
) -> bool:
"""Compose and send the admin-invite email. Returns True on the
happy path; False on SMTP failure. The notifier-side buffer
`_SENT` is appended either way so tests can assert on content.
The body names the inviting admin, embeds the optional custom
message in a clearly delimited block if present, and ships the
claim link. The subject names the inviter so the recipient can
recognize the sender at a glance in their inbox preview.
"""
cfg = EmailConfig.from_env()
subject = _subject(inviter_display, cfg)
body = _body(claim_url, inviter_display, inviter_email, custom_message, cfg)
envelope = {
"to": to_address,
"from": formataddr((cfg.from_name, cfg.from_address)),
"subject": subject,
"body": body,
"kind": "invite",
}
_SENT.append(envelope)
if not cfg.enabled:
log.info("invite email disabled (EMAIL_ENABLED=0): to=%s", to_address)
return True
if not cfg.smtp_host:
# Dev fallback: surface the claim URL at INFO so the operator can
# complete a claim flow without an SMTP relay. In production
# SMTP_HOST is always set per OHM's overlay.
log.info("invite email (stdout fallback): to=%s claim_url=%s", to_address, claim_url)
return True
try:
msg = EmailMessage()
msg["From"] = envelope["from"]
msg["To"] = to_address
msg["Subject"] = subject
msg.set_content(body)
smtp = smtplib.SMTP(cfg.smtp_host, cfg.smtp_port, timeout=30)
try:
if cfg.smtp_starttls:
smtp.starttls()
if cfg.smtp_user:
smtp.login(cfg.smtp_user, cfg.smtp_password)
smtp.send_message(msg)
finally:
smtp.quit()
return True
except Exception:
log.exception("invite email send failed: to=%s", to_address)
return False
def _subject(inviter_display: str, cfg: EmailConfig) -> str:
"""e.g. "You're invited to Wiggleverse by Ben Stull"."""
inviter = inviter_display or "an admin"
return f"You're invited to {cfg.from_name} by {inviter}"
def _body(
claim_url: str,
inviter_display: str,
inviter_email: str,
custom_message: str,
cfg: EmailConfig,
) -> str:
inviter = inviter_display or "An admin"
inviter_suffix = f" ({inviter_email})" if inviter_email else ""
message_block = ""
if custom_message.strip():
# Indent the custom message so it reads as a clearly-delimited
# quote rather than running together with the framework's
# framing text. Per-line indent keeps multi-line messages
# visually grouped in plain-text mail clients.
indented = "\n".join(f" {line}" for line in custom_message.strip().splitlines())
message_block = f"\nA personal note from {inviter}:\n\n{indented}\n"
return (
f"{inviter}{inviter_suffix} has invited you to {cfg.from_name}.\n"
f"{message_block}\n"
f"Click the link below to claim your account and sign in.\n"
f"This link is single-use and expires in 7 days.\n\n"
f" {claim_url}\n\n"
f"If you weren't expecting this invitation, you can ignore this\n"
f"email — no account becomes active until you click the link.\n\n"
f"---\n"
f"{cfg.from_name} · {cfg.app_url}\n"
)