§22 S6 (last item): spec pass for per-type surfaces (§22.4a items 1 & 3)

The per-type frontmatter schemas (item 1) and type-specific surfaces (item 3:
specification release-planning; bdd scenario/coverage views) were flagged at
v0.45.0 as wanting a discovery/spec pass first (they lacked BDD scenarios in
Part C). This is that pass — a design doc specifying the schemas, the surfaces,
their data model / API / frontend shape, BDD-style acceptance scenarios, and a
three-slice delivery plan (S7a schemas, S7b releases, S7c bdd surfaces), all
additive and engine-preserving per §22.4a. Doc-only; no code, no version bump.

- docs/design/2026-06-06-per-type-surfaces.md — the new spec pass.
- three-tier design doc S6 bullet: forward-pointer + S6 shipped/spec'd status.

Leaves implementation to the S7a–S7c coding slices; S7a (schemas) is unblocked,
S7b/S7c carry open product questions for the operator/discovery to settle.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Ben Stull
2026-06-06 02:15:45 -07:00
parent 1c17fecea3
commit 281dd29e62
2 changed files with 361 additions and 0 deletions
@@ -614,6 +614,15 @@ means the deployment runs and either gains a capability or provably loses none
place). **Usable end-state:** the model is fully realized and merged into
`SPEC.md`. **Completes:** type-specific scenarios (added in S6, beyond Part C's
role focus).
- *Shipped in S6 core (v0.45.0):* the SPEC merge, per-collection
`enabled_models`, the type-driven entry noun (§22.4a item 2).
- *Shipped as the S6 remainder (v0.46.0):* request-to-join + the
cross-collection inbox (§22.8).
- *Spec'd, not yet built — the last S6 item:* the per-type **frontmatter
schemas** (§22.4a item 1) and **surfaces** (§22.4a item 3, the
`specification` release-planning + `bdd` scenario/coverage views). The
discovery/spec pass + BDD scenarios + slicing (S7aS7c) are in
[`2026-06-06-per-type-surfaces.md`](./2026-06-06-per-type-surfaces.md).
### Slice → scenario index (the inverse of the `@S<n>` tags)