Release 0.17.0: admin-create user + invite email (+ #21 Part C Amplitude wiring)

Wave 5. Roadmap item #16. Folds in #21 Part C Amplitude wiring inline.

From the v0.9.0 /admin/users surface, an admin can create a fresh
users row, assign a role (admin/owner/granted-beta-user), include
an optional custom message, and dispatch an invite email carrying
a single-use opaque claim token (256-bit CSPRNG, bcrypt-at-rest,
7-day TTL). The invitee clicks through, lands at /invites/claim,
optionally checks "trust this device for 30 days", and is signed
in without going through OTC (the token in the email is itself
proof of email control).

Backend: migration 019_user_invite_tokens.sql (auto-applied);
backend/app/invites.py (create + claim + list module);
backend/app/email_invite.py (sibling of email_otc); POST
/api/admin/users + GET /api/admin/users/invites in api_admin;
POST /api/invites/claim in main.py's oauth_router (shares
trust-device cookie helper with /auth/otc/verify). 15 new tests in
test_admin_create_user_invite_vertical.py. permission_events row
with event_kind='user_invited' for the audit trail.

Frontend: Admin.jsx Create-user-invite modal + (pending invite)
badge in UserRow; InviteClaim.jsx /invites/claim landing page.
App.jsx route registration. api.js helpers.

Design choices documented in the CHANGELOG: immediate-send (no
admin-review queue); no bulk-invite (deferred); OTC skipped on
first sign-in (token = proof of email control); no users table
changes (discriminator is active user_invite_tokens row, not a
new first_sign_in_at column); refusal cases (self-invite 422,
duplicate email 409, non-owner admin granting owner 422).

Amplitude wiring (inline, #21 Part C):
  - USER_INVITED from CreateUserInviteModal { target_user_id,
    initial_role, custom_message_chars }
  - INVITE_CLAIMED from InviteClaim { invited_by_admin_id,
    initial_role, needs_passcode, trust_device }
  - identify() BEFORE the claim event with properties:
    claim_method 'admin-invite', invited_at (setOnce),
    invited_by_admin_id (setOnce), initial_role (setOnce) —
    so the Amplitude user record is created with the OHM
    user_id from the very first event the invitee fires

Subagent ο shipped the feature on feature/v0.17.0-admin-create-user
(41b0c6a). Driver-side integration squash-merged into main,
hand-resolved 5 files (VERSION, package.json, CHANGELOG —
strict-descending to 0.17.0 → 0.16.0 → 0.15.0; App.jsx — both
new routes kept; api_admin.py — both per-user additive fields
+ pending-invite query both kept). Added inline Amplitude wiring
in CreateUserInviteModal + InviteClaim. 252 backend tests pass
(33 new across #12 + #16 surfaces). Frontend build verified green.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Ben Stull
2026-05-28 05:10:52 -07:00
parent ee4925b6ac
commit 1456c8b73f
13 changed files with 2326 additions and 3 deletions
+265 -1
View File
@@ -11,6 +11,8 @@ The endpoints in this module:
- `GET /api/admin/users` — list users with role + mute
- `POST /api/admin/users/<id>/role` — set role per §6.1
- `POST /api/admin/users/<id>/mute` — set the §6.2 write-mute
- `POST /api/admin/users` — v0.17.0: create user + invite
- `GET /api/admin/users/invites` — v0.17.0: pending invites
- `GET /api/admin/audit` — paged `actions` log
- `GET /api/admin/permission-events` — paged `permission_events` log
- `GET /api/admin/graduation-queue` — super-drafts ready to graduate
@@ -33,8 +35,9 @@ from typing import Any
from fastapi import APIRouter, HTTPException, Query, Request
from pydantic import BaseModel, Field
from . import auth, db
from . import auth, db, email_invite, invites
from .config import Config
from .email import EmailConfig
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -65,6 +68,32 @@ class AllowlistAddBody(BaseModel):
note: str | None = Field(default=None, max_length=200)
class CreateUserInviteBody(BaseModel):
"""v0.17.0 / roadmap item #16 — admin-create user + invite email.
The admin types these fields on the "Create user + invite" modal on
`/admin/users`. The email + role are required; first/last name and
the optional custom message round out the body.
Bounds mirror the rest of the codebase:
* `email`: 320 chars — RFC 5321 envelope limit, same as
`OtcRequestBody` / `BetaRequestBody` / `AllowlistAddBody`.
* `first_name` / `last_name`: 120 chars — same as the v0.8.0
`BetaRequestBody` capture form.
* `role`: pydantic regex pinned to the §6.1 set so an unknown
role fails at the body bound (422) instead of landing as a
CHECK constraint violation in the migration.
* `custom_message`: 500 chars — the brief calls this out as
the max. The frontend modal shows a "remaining chars"
counter to match.
"""
email: str = Field(min_length=3, max_length=320)
first_name: str = Field(default="", max_length=120)
last_name: str = Field(default="", max_length=120)
role: str = Field(pattern="^(owner|admin|contributor)$")
custom_message: str = Field(default="", max_length=500)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Router
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -156,6 +185,32 @@ def make_router(config: Config) -> APIRouter:
"inviter_login": ir["inviter_login"],
"inviter_display": ir["inviter_display"],
})
# v0.17.0 / roadmap item #16: a user row whose `last_seen_at`
# is NULL is one of two things — a brand-new row that was just
# provisioned (rare, and the v0.7.0 OTC verify path stamps
# last_seen_at on the same call that creates the row), or an
# admin-created invite-pending row (v0.17.0 — created by
# `POST /api/admin/users`). We surface a `pending_invite_id`
# field by joining through `user_invite_tokens` so the
# Users tab can render a "(pending invite)" badge alongside
# the role/state controls. Filters to invites that are
# neither expired nor claimed — once the invitee clicks
# through, the badge clears (and `last_seen_at` populates).
pending_invite_rows = db.conn().execute(
"""
SELECT invited_user_id, id AS invite_id, expires_at
FROM user_invite_tokens
WHERE claimed_at IS NULL
AND datetime(expires_at) > datetime('now')
"""
).fetchall()
pending_invites = {
r["invited_user_id"]: {
"invite_id": r["invite_id"],
"expires_at": r["expires_at"],
}
for r in pending_invite_rows
}
return {
"items": [
{
@@ -176,6 +231,215 @@ def make_router(config: Config) -> APIRouter:
"permission_decided_by_display": r["decided_by_display"],
# v0.16.0 additive — never null, always an array.
"rfc_invitations": per_user_invites.get(r["id"], []),
# v0.17.0: present iff the row is invited-but-not-
# claimed-yet. The frontend renders a "(pending
# invite)" badge when this is non-null.
"pending_invite": pending_invites.get(r["id"]),
}
for r in rows
]
}
# ----- Create user + invite (v0.17.0 / roadmap item #16) -----
@router.post("/api/admin/users")
async def create_user_with_invite(
body: CreateUserInviteBody, request: Request,
) -> dict[str, Any]:
"""Provision a fresh `users` row with a pre-assigned role + send
an invite email carrying a claim link.
Refusals:
* `422` — the admin tries to invite their own email (no
self-invite; symmetric to `set_permission`'s self-flip
refusal and `set_role`'s self-downgrade refusal). Use
the existing role-change channel for self-edits.
* `422` — the admin tries to grant `owner` without being
owner themselves. §6.1: owner-zero is the only owner
bootstrap path; new owners come from a sitting owner's
hand. A 422 here matches the message shape; a 403 would
also be defensible, but staying with 422 keeps the
"your input is bad" framing.
* `409` — the email already maps to a `users` row. The
admin should use the existing role / grant gestures on
the existing user, not create a duplicate.
* `422` — pydantic-level: malformed email, role outside
the §6.1 set, custom_message over 500 chars.
On success:
1. The invitee `users` row lands with the chosen role and
`permission_state='granted'` (admin's hand is the grant)
and `last_seen_at IS NULL` (the "(pending invite)"
discriminator the listing surface joins through).
2. The `user_invite_tokens` row lands with the bcrypt-
hashed opaque token; the raw token rides only in the
email link.
3. The invite email dispatches with subject "You're
invited to <app> by <admin>" and the custom message
embedded in a clearly-delimited block if present.
4. A `permission_events` row records the admin-create
gesture so the §6.5 / `permissions` admin tab carries
the audit trail alongside the existing grant/revoke
flips.
"""
viewer = auth.require_admin(request)
email_clean = body.email.strip().lower()
if "@" not in email_clean or len(email_clean.split("@")[-1]) < 2:
raise HTTPException(422, "Email looks malformed")
# Self-invite refusal. Compare the admin's own email
# case-insensitively against the invite target.
viewer_row = db.conn().execute(
"SELECT email FROM users WHERE id = ?", (viewer.user_id,)
).fetchone()
viewer_email = (viewer_row["email"] or "").strip().lower() if viewer_row else ""
if viewer_email and viewer_email == email_clean:
raise HTTPException(
422,
"You cannot invite yourself — use the role-change channel "
"if you need to edit your own row",
)
# Owner-grant refusal: §6.1 says only a sitting owner can mint
# a new owner. An admin trying to invite-as-owner is refused
# at 422; the admin should ask the owner to issue the invite,
# or invite as `admin` and let the owner promote later.
if body.role == "owner" and viewer.role != "owner":
raise HTTPException(
422,
"Only an owner can invite a new owner — invite as admin and "
"ask the owner to promote, or have the owner issue this invite",
)
# Duplicate-email refusal. A pre-existing row (regardless of
# permission_state) means the admin should use the existing
# role / grant gestures, not create a parallel user.
existing = db.conn().execute(
"SELECT id FROM users WHERE email = ? COLLATE NOCASE LIMIT 1",
(email_clean,),
).fetchone()
if existing is not None:
raise HTTPException(409, "A user with this email already exists")
# Create the invitee row + token row + send the email.
outcome = invites.create_invite(
email=email_clean,
first_name=body.first_name,
last_name=body.last_name,
role=body.role,
custom_message=body.custom_message,
created_by_admin_id=viewer.user_id,
)
# Audit row in permission_events so the admin Permissions tab
# carries the gesture. The before-state is "n/a" (the row
# did not exist); the after-state is the granted role. We
# use a new `event_kind='user_invited'` so the existing
# grant/revoke kinds stay scoped to their flip surface.
db.conn().execute(
"""
INSERT INTO permission_events
(actor_user_id, subject_user_id, event_kind, details)
VALUES (?, ?, 'user_invited', ?)
""",
(
viewer.user_id,
outcome.invited_user_id,
json.dumps({
"email": email_clean,
"role": body.role,
"invite_id": outcome.invite_id,
"custom_message_chars": len(body.custom_message or ""),
}),
),
)
# Build the claim URL using the same APP_URL the email module
# reads. The token rides as a query-string param to the
# frontend route `/invites/claim?token=…`; the frontend POSTs
# it back to `/api/invites/claim` which consumes the row.
cfg = EmailConfig.from_env()
from urllib.parse import urlencode
claim_url = f"{cfg.app_url}/invites/claim?{urlencode({'token': outcome.raw_token})}"
# Fetch the inviter display so the email body can render
# "Ben Stull (ben@example.com) has invited you to …". We
# read off the row fresh rather than trusting the session
# cookie's cached display_name.
inviter_row = db.conn().execute(
"SELECT display_name, email FROM users WHERE id = ?",
(viewer.user_id,),
).fetchone()
inviter_display = (
(inviter_row["display_name"] if inviter_row else "") or viewer.display_name or "An admin"
)
inviter_email_for_body = (inviter_row["email"] if inviter_row else "") or viewer.email or ""
email_invite.send_invite_email(
to_address=email_clean,
claim_url=claim_url,
inviter_display=inviter_display,
inviter_email=inviter_email_for_body,
custom_message=body.custom_message,
)
return {
"ok": True,
"invite_id": outcome.invite_id,
"invited_user_id": outcome.invited_user_id,
"email": email_clean,
"role": body.role,
}
@router.get("/api/admin/users/invites")
async def list_user_invites(request: Request) -> dict[str, Any]:
"""List active (not claimed, not expired) admin-issued invites.
Powers the admin's "I sent these but they haven't been claimed
yet" view. The frontend uses this alongside `list_users` —
the user-listing's `pending_invite` field carries the per-row
flag; this endpoint carries the full invite shape for a
dedicated drill-in surface.
"""
auth.require_admin(request)
rows = invites.list_pending_invites()
# Join through to the admin display names so the surface can
# render "invited by @ben" without a second client call.
admin_ids = {r.created_by_admin_id for r in rows}
admin_lookup: dict[int, dict[str, str]] = {}
if admin_ids:
placeholders = ",".join("?" * len(admin_ids))
admin_rows = db.conn().execute(
f"SELECT id, gitea_login, display_name FROM users "
f"WHERE id IN ({placeholders})",
tuple(admin_ids),
).fetchall()
admin_lookup = {
ar["id"]: {
"gitea_login": ar["gitea_login"] or "",
"display_name": ar["display_name"] or "",
}
for ar in admin_rows
}
return {
"items": [
{
"id": r.id,
"email": r.email,
"role": r.role,
"first_name": r.first_name,
"last_name": r.last_name,
"custom_message": r.custom_message,
"created_at": r.created_at,
"expires_at": r.expires_at,
"invited_user_id": r.invited_user_id,
"created_by_admin_id": r.created_by_admin_id,
"created_by_login": admin_lookup.get(
r.created_by_admin_id, {}
).get("gitea_login", ""),
"created_by_display": admin_lookup.get(
r.created_by_admin_id, {}
).get("display_name", ""),
}
for r in rows
]
+136
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
"""Outbound admin-invite email — a thin wrapper over the existing SMTP layer.
v0.17.0 / roadmap item #16: when an admin uses `POST /api/admin/users` to
create-with-invite, this module composes and sends the invite envelope.
Structurally distinct from:
* `email_otc.py` (v0.7.0) that one carries a credential the user
just requested; this one carries a credential the admin is sending
unsolicited.
* `email.py` (§15.4 notification mailer) that one is inbox-driven,
bundled, with category opt-outs; this one is a single transactional
outbound to a person who does not yet have an inbox.
* v0.9.0's `new_beta_request` admin notification — that one is
invitee-to-admin (an existing pending user asking to be let in);
this one is admin-to-invitee (an admin reaching out to seed access).
So this module reuses `EmailConfig.from_env()` for the SMTP plumbing
and the From identity, but writes its own envelope. In dev (no
SMTP_HOST set), the envelope is logged at INFO level and pushed to
the same `_SENT` buffer the notification mailer uses, so the
integration tests can assert on the outbound shape without standing
up an SMTP server.
The send is synchronous. The admin endpoint returns 200 on the
create-row half regardless of send outcome a transient SMTP
failure should not roll back the invite (an admin can re-send via a
future "resend invite" gesture, deferred to a follow-up release).
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import logging
import smtplib
from email.message import EmailMessage
from email.utils import formataddr
from .email import EmailConfig, _SENT
log = logging.getLogger(__name__)
def send_invite_email(
*,
to_address: str,
claim_url: str,
inviter_display: str,
inviter_email: str,
custom_message: str = "",
) -> bool:
"""Compose and send the admin-invite email. Returns True on the
happy path; False on SMTP failure. The notifier-side buffer
`_SENT` is appended either way so tests can assert on content.
The body names the inviting admin, embeds the optional custom
message in a clearly delimited block if present, and ships the
claim link. The subject names the inviter so the recipient can
recognize the sender at a glance in their inbox preview.
"""
cfg = EmailConfig.from_env()
subject = _subject(inviter_display, cfg)
body = _body(claim_url, inviter_display, inviter_email, custom_message, cfg)
envelope = {
"to": to_address,
"from": formataddr((cfg.from_name, cfg.from_address)),
"subject": subject,
"body": body,
"kind": "invite",
}
_SENT.append(envelope)
if not cfg.enabled:
log.info("invite email disabled (EMAIL_ENABLED=0): to=%s", to_address)
return True
if not cfg.smtp_host:
# Dev fallback: surface the claim URL at INFO so the operator can
# complete a claim flow without an SMTP relay. In production
# SMTP_HOST is always set per OHM's overlay.
log.info("invite email (stdout fallback): to=%s claim_url=%s", to_address, claim_url)
return True
try:
msg = EmailMessage()
msg["From"] = envelope["from"]
msg["To"] = to_address
msg["Subject"] = subject
msg.set_content(body)
smtp = smtplib.SMTP(cfg.smtp_host, cfg.smtp_port, timeout=30)
try:
if cfg.smtp_starttls:
smtp.starttls()
if cfg.smtp_user:
smtp.login(cfg.smtp_user, cfg.smtp_password)
smtp.send_message(msg)
finally:
smtp.quit()
return True
except Exception:
log.exception("invite email send failed: to=%s", to_address)
return False
def _subject(inviter_display: str, cfg: EmailConfig) -> str:
"""e.g. "You're invited to Wiggleverse by Ben Stull"."""
inviter = inviter_display or "an admin"
return f"You're invited to {cfg.from_name} by {inviter}"
def _body(
claim_url: str,
inviter_display: str,
inviter_email: str,
custom_message: str,
cfg: EmailConfig,
) -> str:
inviter = inviter_display or "An admin"
inviter_suffix = f" ({inviter_email})" if inviter_email else ""
message_block = ""
if custom_message.strip():
# Indent the custom message so it reads as a clearly-delimited
# quote rather than running together with the framework's
# framing text. Per-line indent keeps multi-line messages
# visually grouped in plain-text mail clients.
indented = "\n".join(f" {line}" for line in custom_message.strip().splitlines())
message_block = f"\nA personal note from {inviter}:\n\n{indented}\n"
return (
f"{inviter}{inviter_suffix} has invited you to {cfg.from_name}.\n"
f"{message_block}\n"
f"Click the link below to claim your account and sign in.\n"
f"This link is single-use and expires in 7 days.\n\n"
f" {claim_url}\n\n"
f"If you weren't expecting this invitation, you can ignore this\n"
f"email — no account becomes active until you click the link.\n\n"
f"---\n"
f"{cfg.from_name} · {cfg.app_url}\n"
)
+425
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,425 @@
"""§6.1 / v0.17.0: admin-create user with role + invite email (roadmap item #16).
Distinguishes from the v0.8.0 self-serve beta-access flow:
* **Self-serve (v0.8.0)** anyone with an email can request OTC sign-in;
a fresh `users` row lands in `permission_state='pending'`; an admin
grants or revokes via the v0.9.0 user-management page.
* **Admin-create (v0.17.0)** an admin types first/last/email/role
*before* the invitee has signed in. The framework provisions the
`users` row with the chosen role and `permission_state='granted'`
(the admin's hand is the grant) and `last_seen_at IS NULL` as the
"invited but not yet arrived" discriminator. An invite-token row
lands in `user_invite_tokens`; the admin's chosen `custom_message`
(if any) rides in the email body alongside the claim link.
* **Claim flow** the invitee clicks the link, which lands them at
`/invites/claim?token=`. The page POSTs `/api/invites/claim` with
the token. The framework verifies the token (not expired, not
claimed, hash matches), marks the row claimed, signs the user in,
and returns a payload telling the frontend whether to route to
passcode-set (if v0.10.0 passcode flow is in play and the user has
no passcode yet) or to `/`. **No OTC roundtrip** clicking the
unique token in the email is itself proof of email control, per
the roadmap. This is the intentional UX shortcut for first
sign-in; subsequent sign-ins use the standard OTC / passcode
paths.
The shape:
* `create_invite(...)` provision the invitee `users` row + the
`user_invite_tokens` row, return the raw token for the admin
endpoint to put in the outbound email link.
* `claim(raw_token)` validate the token, mark it claimed, return
the `SessionUser` the endpoint signs in. Distinguishes the failure
modes (`expired`, `claimed`, `unknown`, `invalid`) so the endpoint
can map them to HTTP 410 vs HTTP 404 cleanly.
* `list_pending_invites()` return active invites for the admin
listing surface. Filters out claimed + expired rows so the surface
only shows live invites.
Token shape: opaque DB token (256 bits of CSPRNG entropy via
`secrets.token_urlsafe(32)`), bcrypt-hashed at rest. Opaque chosen
over JWT because revocation is then a single SQL UPDATE a JWT
would be stateless but harder to invalidate, and admin-issued
invites are exactly the kind of thing an admin should be able to
yank back. The raw token only ever lives in the outbound email link
and the inbound claim body; server-side storage is the hash.
TTL: hard-coded to 7 days via `INVITE_TOKEN_TTL_DAYS`. Env-var
configurability is a §19.2 candidate the constant is exposed
here as a single point of edit if a deployment wants to override.
The 500-char ceiling on `custom_message` is enforced at the
Pydantic body level in `api_admin.py`; this module trusts what
the endpoint hands it.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import logging
import secrets
from dataclasses import dataclass
import bcrypt
from . import db
from .auth import SessionUser
log = logging.getLogger(__name__)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Tunables — intentionally hard-coded in v0.17.0 (§19.2 candidate to env-ify).
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
INVITE_TOKEN_TTL_DAYS = 7
# 256 bits of CSPRNG entropy. `secrets.token_urlsafe(32)` yields ~43
# URL-safe characters; the bcrypt hash is what's stored, so the raw
# token only ever lives in the outbound email link.
TOKEN_BYTES = 32
# Free-text ceiling for the admin's optional custom message. Matched
# at the Pydantic body bound in `api_admin.py`; mentioned here so the
# bound is documented in one place.
CUSTOM_MESSAGE_MAX_LENGTH = 500
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Token + hash helpers (mirror device_trust.py shape)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def _new_token() -> str:
return secrets.token_urlsafe(TOKEN_BYTES)
def _hash(token: str) -> str:
return bcrypt.hashpw(token.encode("utf-8"), bcrypt.gensalt()).decode("ascii")
def _check(token: str, token_hash: str) -> bool:
try:
return bcrypt.checkpw(token.encode("utf-8"), token_hash.encode("ascii"))
except (ValueError, TypeError):
return False
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Create
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
@dataclass
class CreateOutcome:
"""The shape returned from `create_invite`.
`raw_token` is what the admin endpoint puts in the outbound email
link; it never appears in storage. `invite_id` is the surrogate
key for the admin's "invites I've sent" listing. `invited_user_id`
is the freshly-provisioned `users` row id so the admin surface can
join through to the user-management page.
"""
raw_token: str
invite_id: int
invited_user_id: int
def create_invite(
*,
email: str,
first_name: str,
last_name: str,
role: str,
custom_message: str,
created_by_admin_id: int,
) -> CreateOutcome:
"""Provision the invitee `users` row + the `user_invite_tokens` row.
Caller (`api_admin.py`) is responsible for the admin-only auth check,
the self-email refusal (422), and the duplicate-email refusal (409).
This function trusts what it's handed and writes both rows
transactionally the v0.10.0 `passcode.py` / v0.11.0 `device_trust.py`
helpers follow the same separation-of-concerns pattern.
The invitee `users` row is provisioned with:
* `permission_state='granted'` the admin's hand is the grant;
the v0.8.0 self-serve `pending` queue is for the other path.
* `last_seen_at = NULL` the discriminator for "invited but
not yet arrived" per the §16 / roadmap design. Every sign-in
path stamps `last_seen_at` to now, so a NULL value means the
invited user has not clicked through yet.
* `gitea_id = NULL`, `gitea_login = NULL` same as a v0.7.0
OTC-provisioned user; the OAuth identity is grandfathered if
the user ever lands through that path.
* `display_name` defaults to "<first> <last>" (or local-part of
email if both are empty) so the user-management page reads a
sensible label before the user has signed in.
* `first_name` / `last_name` / `beta_request_reason` the
first two from the admin's typed values; reason stays blank
(this user did not self-request access).
"""
email_clean = email.strip()
first_clean = (first_name or "").strip()
last_clean = (last_name or "").strip()
display = " ".join(p for p in (first_clean, last_clean) if p).strip()
if not display:
display = email_clean.split("@", 1)[0] or email_clean
# 1. Provision the invitee users row. The grant is the admin's
# hand; no permission_events row is necessary for the grant itself
# (we are not transitioning from pending → granted, we are landing
# a fresh row directly into granted).
#
# Note on the "pending invite" discriminator: the brief floated
# `first_sign_in_at NULL` / `last_seen_at NULL` as the marker the
# admin user-management page reads off the row to render the
# "(pending invite)" badge. The schema didn't cooperate — the
# existing `users.last_seen_at` column is NOT NULL with a
# `datetime('now')` default (see `migrations/001_users_and_audit.sql`),
# and there is no `first_sign_in_at` column. Rather than introduce
# a schema migration to add one (the brief explicitly said "likely
# no `users` table changes"), the discriminator is the existence of
# an active row in `user_invite_tokens` joined on `invited_user_id`.
# The admin listing's `pending_invite` field joins through that
# table; the claim flow stamps `claimed_at` on the invite row,
# which clears the badge naturally. This shape keeps the
# discriminator scoped to the v0.17.0 surface and avoids
# double-tracking against an existing column.
cur = db.conn().execute(
"""
INSERT INTO users (
gitea_id, gitea_login, email, display_name, avatar_url,
role, permission_state, first_name, last_name
)
VALUES (NULL, NULL, ?, ?, '', ?, 'granted', ?, ?)
""",
(email_clean, display, role, first_clean, last_clean),
)
invited_user_id = cur.lastrowid
# 2. Mint the token, hash it, write the invite row.
raw = _new_token()
h = _hash(raw)
cur = db.conn().execute(
f"""
INSERT INTO user_invite_tokens (
email, role, first_name, last_name, custom_message,
token_hash, expires_at, created_by_admin_id, invited_user_id
)
VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, datetime('now', '+{INVITE_TOKEN_TTL_DAYS} days'), ?, ?)
""",
(
email_clean,
role,
first_clean,
last_clean,
(custom_message or "").strip(),
h,
created_by_admin_id,
invited_user_id,
),
)
invite_id = cur.lastrowid
return CreateOutcome(
raw_token=raw,
invite_id=invite_id,
invited_user_id=invited_user_id,
)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Claim
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
@dataclass
class ClaimOutcome:
"""The result of `claim`.
`user` is populated only on success. `reason` distinguishes the
failure modes so the endpoint can return distinct HTTP statuses
(HTTP 410 for expired/claimed the token is dead; HTTP 400 for
unknown/invalid the request shape is wrong).
"""
ok: bool
user: SessionUser | None
reason: str # 'ok' | 'invalid' | 'unknown' | 'expired' | 'claimed'
invite_id: int | None = None
def claim(raw_token: str) -> ClaimOutcome:
"""Validate the presented token and consume it.
Walks the active invite rows looking for a bcrypt hash match.
Mirrors `device_trust.lookup`: bcrypt's per-row salt means we
cannot SELECT by hash, but the set is small (a deployment's
outstanding invites at any moment) and bcrypt is cheap on the
order of milliseconds.
On a hit:
* Mark the row claimed (stamp `claimed_at = now`,
`claimed_by_user_id = invited_user_id` the admin's
pre-provisioned row is the claimant).
* Stamp `last_seen_at = now` on the user row so the v0.9.0
admin user-management page no longer shows "(pending invite)".
* Return a populated `SessionUser` for the endpoint to sign in.
On a miss:
* `unknown` no row matched. The token may have been forged or
the invite was admin-revoked.
* `expired` row matched but `expires_at` is in the past.
* `claimed` row matched but `claimed_at` is non-NULL. The
token was already consumed; the user must contact the admin
for a fresh invite.
* `invalid` the token string itself was empty or unparseable.
"""
raw = (raw_token or "").strip()
if not raw:
return ClaimOutcome(ok=False, user=None, reason="invalid")
rows = db.conn().execute(
"""
SELECT id, token_hash, expires_at, claimed_at, invited_user_id, role
FROM user_invite_tokens
ORDER BY id DESC
"""
).fetchall()
matched = None
for row in rows:
if _check(raw, row["token_hash"]):
matched = row
break
if matched is None:
return ClaimOutcome(ok=False, user=None, reason="unknown")
if matched["claimed_at"] is not None:
return ClaimOutcome(
ok=False, user=None, reason="claimed", invite_id=matched["id"],
)
expired = db.conn().execute(
"SELECT datetime(?) < datetime('now') AS expired",
(matched["expires_at"],),
).fetchone()["expired"]
if expired:
return ClaimOutcome(
ok=False, user=None, reason="expired", invite_id=matched["id"],
)
# Consume the row before signing in so a parallel claim of the same
# token cannot double-sign-in. (Mirrors `otc.verify_code`'s consume-
# before-provision shape.)
db.conn().execute(
"""
UPDATE user_invite_tokens
SET claimed_at = datetime('now'),
claimed_by_user_id = invited_user_id
WHERE id = ?
""",
(matched["id"],),
)
# Stamp last_seen_at on the user row so the user's activity stamp
# is current after the claim (mirroring otc.verify_code's
# last-seen update on the provision path). The "(pending invite)"
# badge's clear is driven by the invite row's `claimed_at`
# transition above; this update is for the general user-listing's
# recency ordering.
db.conn().execute(
"UPDATE users SET last_seen_at = datetime('now') WHERE id = ?",
(matched["invited_user_id"],),
)
user_row = db.conn().execute(
"""
SELECT id, gitea_id, gitea_login, email, display_name, avatar_url,
role, permission_state
FROM users
WHERE id = ?
""",
(matched["invited_user_id"],),
).fetchone()
if user_row is None:
# The invitee user row was deleted between create_invite and
# claim (shouldn't happen under the FK ON DELETE CASCADE — the
# cascade would drop the invite row too — be defensive anyway).
return ClaimOutcome(
ok=False, user=None, reason="unknown", invite_id=matched["id"],
)
return ClaimOutcome(
ok=True,
user=SessionUser(
user_id=user_row["id"],
gitea_id=user_row["gitea_id"] or 0,
gitea_login=user_row["gitea_login"] or "",
display_name=user_row["display_name"],
email=user_row["email"] or "",
avatar_url=user_row["avatar_url"] or "",
role=user_row["role"],
permission_state=user_row["permission_state"] or "granted",
),
reason="ok",
invite_id=matched["id"],
)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# List pending invites — for the admin's review surface
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
@dataclass
class PendingInviteRow:
"""The shape the `GET /api/admin/users/invites` endpoint returns.
Note the absence of `token_hash` the hash is structurally private,
and the surface has no use for it. The raw token is also not on
the listing; it lives only in the email link.
"""
id: int
email: str
role: str
first_name: str
last_name: str
custom_message: str
created_at: str
expires_at: str
created_by_admin_id: int
invited_user_id: int
def list_pending_invites() -> list[PendingInviteRow]:
"""Active invites (not claimed, not expired), freshest first.
The admin's "I sent these but they haven't been claimed yet" view.
Filters mirror the `device_trust.list_for_user` shape: the surface
only shows live records the framework would actually accept on a
presented token.
"""
rows = db.conn().execute(
"""
SELECT id, email, role, first_name, last_name, custom_message,
created_at, expires_at, created_by_admin_id, invited_user_id
FROM user_invite_tokens
WHERE claimed_at IS NULL
AND datetime(expires_at) > datetime('now')
ORDER BY created_at DESC, id DESC
"""
).fetchall()
return [
PendingInviteRow(
id=row["id"],
email=row["email"],
role=row["role"],
first_name=row["first_name"] or "",
last_name=row["last_name"] or "",
custom_message=row["custom_message"] or "",
created_at=row["created_at"],
expires_at=row["expires_at"],
created_by_admin_id=row["created_by_admin_id"],
invited_user_id=row["invited_user_id"],
)
for row in rows
]
+109
View File
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ from . import (
digest,
email_otc,
hygiene,
invites as invites_mod,
otc,
passcode as passcode_mod,
providers as providers_mod,
@@ -72,6 +73,25 @@ class PasscodeVerifyBody(BaseModel):
trust_device: bool = False
class InviteClaimBody(BaseModel):
"""v0.17.0 / roadmap item #16 — claim an admin-issued invite token.
The frontend `/invites/claim?token=` page reads the token from
the URL and POSTs it here. The body bound matches the
`secrets.token_urlsafe(32)` output shape (~43 URL-safe chars);
the upper bound stays generous in case `TOKEN_BYTES` is ever
raised. The token-shape is opaque to this layer `invites.claim`
bcrypt-checks it against the active candidate set.
"""
token: str = Field(min_length=1, max_length=512)
# v0.11.0-style opt-in: the claim flow's "trust this device" gesture
# is bundled here so the invitee can land trusted on first sign-in
# without an extra roundtrip. Defaults to false so the gesture is
# explicit (the frontend modal renders a checkbox alongside the
# claim CTA).
trust_device: bool = False
@asynccontextmanager
async def lifespan(app: FastAPI):
config = load_config()
@@ -382,6 +402,95 @@ def _oauth_router(config) -> APIRouter:
},
}
# ---------------------------------------------------------------
# v0.17.0: admin-create user + invite claim (§6.1, roadmap item #16).
#
# The admin-create surface lives at POST /api/admin/users (see
# api_admin.py); this endpoint is the corresponding claim path the
# invitee hits when they click the link in their invite email.
# The frontend route `/invites/claim?token=…` reads the token from
# the URL and POSTs it here.
#
# The claim itself is the first-sign-in for the invitee: clicking
# the unique token in the email is proof of email control per the
# roadmap, so this endpoint skips the OTC step entirely on first
# sign-in. The session cookie lands; the response tells the
# frontend whether to route to passcode-set (if v0.10.0 passcode
# flow is in play and the user has not yet set a passcode) or to
# home.
#
# The endpoint is anonymous-reachable: the entire point is to
# establish the session, so we do not gate it on `require_user`.
# The trust-device opt-in mirrors the v0.11.0 OTC/passcode verify
# contract (the body's `trust_device` flag, when true, mints a
# fresh device-trust row on the same response so the invitee
# lands trusted on their first device).
# ---------------------------------------------------------------
@router.post("/api/invites/claim")
async def invites_claim(body: InviteClaimBody, request: Request, response: Response):
result = invites_mod.claim(body.token)
if result.reason == "expired":
# The token's TTL window passed without a claim. HTTP 410
# (Gone) so the frontend can render a "this invite has
# expired — please contact the admin for a fresh one"
# message distinct from the generic invalid-token shape.
raise HTTPException(410, "This invite has expired")
if result.reason == "claimed":
# The token was already consumed. HTTP 410 for the same
# reason — the row is dead either way.
raise HTTPException(410, "This invite has already been claimed")
if not result.ok or result.user is None:
# 'unknown' / 'invalid' — the token does not match any
# active invite row. HTTP 400 so it reads distinct from
# the dead-token shape above.
raise HTTPException(400, "Invalid invite token")
# Establish the session. From here on the invitee is signed
# in as the pre-provisioned user row carrying their
# pre-assigned role.
auth.store_session(request, result.user)
# v0.11.0 — opt-in device trust on the claim response. Same
# contract as OTC/passcode verify: when the body's flag is
# true, the server mints a fresh device-trust row and sets
# the long-lived cookie, so the invitee skips the email step
# on subsequent visits to the same browser.
if body.trust_device:
ua = request.headers.get("user-agent", "")
outcome = device_trust_mod.issue(result.user.user_id, ua)
_set_device_trust_cookie(response, outcome.raw_token)
# Has the user already set a passcode? (Could only happen via
# an admin pre-population path that doesn't exist yet, but
# the response shape mirrors `/api/auth/me` so the frontend
# can read it without a second call.) If `needs_passcode` is
# true and v0.10.0 passcode flow is in play, the frontend
# routes to /settings/notifications#sign-in to set a passcode
# immediately; otherwise it routes to /.
row = db.conn().execute(
"SELECT passcode_hash FROM users WHERE id = ?",
(result.user.user_id,),
).fetchone()
has_passcode = bool(row and row["passcode_hash"])
return {
"ok": True,
"user": {
"id": result.user.user_id,
"display_name": result.user.display_name,
"email": result.user.email,
"role": result.user.role,
"permission_state": result.user.permission_state,
},
# Roadmap §16: the claim flow skips OTC entirely; the
# natural next step is passcode-set (so the invitee can
# sign back in without needing an email roundtrip on their
# second visit). The frontend uses this hint to decide
# whether to route to the passcode-set screen or to home.
"needs_passcode": not has_passcode,
}
# ---------------------------------------------------------------
# v0.11.0: trust device for 30 days (§6.2, roadmap item #9).
#